Death Penalty Persuasive Speech

Death Penalty Persuasive Speech
"I'm going to heaven, I'll see you when I come," these are the last words of Dennis McGuire, a man sentenced to death row. Little did he know that
26–minutes after his lethal injection he would still be gasping for air. Dennis McGuire is just one of seven percent of death penalties that were
botched or messed up. Many others and I have one main goal; our goal is to stop these horrible death penalties.
Although many Americans probably think the death penalty is the right punishment for someone who has hurt people, but have they ever thought
about how inhumane it is. Well, I am here to prove that point by telling yet another story about a convicted inmate. Clayton Lockett was convicted to a
death sentence. He knew eventually how he was going to receive the death sentence, but he thought, just like his correctional officer, he was going to
die painlessly and quickly. Clayton did not die by lethal injection, but of a heart attack. According to the Washington Post, Clayton did not he until 43
minutes after 3 injectable drugs,of a heart attack. The same article An Inhumane Death explains that they said it took the man this long due to an
exploded vein. This and 7% of death...show more content...
President Obama had this to say about the death penalty, ""The application of the death penalty in this country, we have seen significant problems––
racial bias, uneven application of the death penalty, you know, situations in which there were individuals ondeath row who later on were discovered to
have been innocent because of exculpatory evidence." To support this No Death Penalty Organization has said since 1900, 102 people in 25 states
have been released from death row with evidence of their innocence. Also, since 1900–according to the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) –there
have been 4 cases each year of convicts convicted of murder are actually
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

Persuasive Essay On The Death Penalty
Despite public support, the United States death penalty is a senseless waste of money
The majority of the American public continues to support the use of the death penalty despite the fact that it appears to be losing popularity in
statehouses and courthouses nationwide. Support for capital punishment runs higher among white people who view individual responsibility as a
narrative for "true" Americans. Racial prejudice is part of that support due mainly in where they live. The more black people you interact with on a
regular basis the more it will reflect your racial attitude. As the numbers of Black and other minorities increase, that greatly impacts White support for
capital punishment.
Gallup's annual crime poll conducted in 2015 showed that about six in ten Americans favored the use of the death penalty for a person convicted of
murder. Additionally, 40% of Americans say the death penalty is not imposed enough. As of November 9, 2016, 31 U.S. states have the death penalty.
Nineteen states have either overturned it or abolished all together.
On the web site, deathpenaltyinfo.org, it projects that the United States has executed 1465 people since 1976. The state–by–state database keeps track
of anything related to capital punishment with resources and stats updated on a regular basis. At the top of the list, Texas leads the U.S. as a whole,
with 545 executions, the most recent one occurred in November of 2017. In 2017, counties throughout the 50 states imposed death

In 1996, 17 year old Kelly Anne Bates was murdered by her 49 year old boyfriend, James Smith, but it wasn't just any murder. She had over a
hundred injuries found on her body, with stab wounds by knives, forks and scissors equally including her mouth. Smith burned and scalded her
legs, and mutilated her ears, nose, eyebrows, mouth, lips and genitalia. Moreover, stab wounds were also found in Kelly's empty eye sockets.
Smith even gouged at her eyes while she lived. Kelly lost over 40 pounds through starvation, and had not received any water for several days
leading up to her death. Smith confessed the police that she drowned on her own, but police found blood in nearly every room. She did actually by
drown, although reports show she was beaten around the head with a shower head immediately beforehand. Smith was soon after sentenced to life in
prison ( Criminology in Oz "Anne Bates"). Kelly's parents, Tommy and Margaret, said after all the suffering that Smith put their daughter through, he
deserves to be put to death (Myall). No one can blame them, after thinking about all the suffering that Kelly was put through, it only makes sense that
her parents would want Smith dead. The death penalty is a sensitive topic, as it is a discussion of the government putting down a life, for a life.
However, when it comes to the point where the jury "was provided with professional counselling to help them deal with the distress of seeing the
photographs of Bates' injuries and the 'sickening

Persuasive Essay Against Death Penalty
According to Amnesty International 31 states in North America are exercising death penalty whereas 19 states have banned the exercise. While some
states are contemplating whether they should away with death penalty, others are adamant they will not bow out. As such, American people are
divided on whether they should support it or not with a few undecided. In this paper I will look at the reasons why I feel it's not justified for any state
in North America to practice this form of sentencing. To begin with, not every inmate in a prison is guilty of the crimes he was accused of and
ultimately convicted by the court. Many people are behind bars spending years as prisoners as they serve their sentences for the crimes they never
committed. If a state decides to execute the wrongly convicted person then several months later new information or evidence arises the deceased wasn't
involved in the crimes he was charged with; isn't it right to say the state shed an innocent blood? The deceased's family will go through psychological
turmoil fully aware the state killed an innocent man. It would be better if the person was sentenced to life imprisonment. When the state receives new
information the imprisoned person didn't commit the crime, then they would release him with apology and compensate him. Furthermore, there is no
substantive evidence which firmly shows death penalty deters people from committing crimes. Criminals always have a systematic thought pattern they
will never be

Do you ever wonder what should happen to dangerous criminals? Watching the news just thinking "huh?" Well what do you think should happen to the
dangerous criminals? There are many opinions. Some people think the only option is the death penalty. I honestly agree and disagree with that because
there are some death penalties are justified and some are not .Listen to these two cases.
Thurgood Marshall was confirmed as the nation's first African–American Supreme Court Justice. Marshall's legacy is linked to his historic victory in
1954 as counsel in Brown v. Board of Education, breaking down the barriers of "separate but equal" segregated public education. But he is equally
associated with his representation of capital defendants in racially...show more content...
In 1941, Marshall represented W.D. Lyons, an illiterate 21–year–old black sharecropper beaten into confessing to murdering a white family and burning
down their home. Enduring racial epithets from an initially hostile white community, Marshall subjected the police who had framed Lyons to withering
cross–examination and showed that they had obviously lied on the stand. Lyons was convicted and–after the U.S. Supreme Court denied his
appeal–executed, but historians say the case awakened Marshall to the ability of lawyers to empower oppressed communities. Later, Marshall won
retrials for three young African–American men who had been falsely accused of raping a 17–year–old white woman in Lake County, Florida. Two of
the "Groveland Four" (a fourth young man charged in the case had been lynched by a white mob after escaping from custody) were wrongly sentenced
to death; one of them was murdered and the other shot several times by a sheriff while being transported to their retrial. The surviving defendant was
convicted and resentenced to death, but received a last–minute commutation. The third defendant–who was 16 at the time–received a life sentence. In
April 2017, the Florida legislature issued an apology for the killings and wrongful convictions and asked Governor Rick Scott to issue posthumous
pardons for the four. In November 1946, Marshall nearly was murdered. Tennessee law

Death Penalty Persuasive Essay
Andre Crawford killed 11 women on Chicago's South Side over the course of six years. He lured his victims to abandoned buildings, then strangled,
beat or stabbed them. As they lay dying, he raped them. Later he returned to have sex with the corpses (Andre Crawford). None of this was enough
for him to get the toughest punishment allowed under Illinois law: the death penalty. In some places, people receive the death penalty for killing one
person. So why shouldn't he for 11 murders? Since 1973, only 153 people have been exonerated from death row. Some states abolished the death
penalty so it can't be used. 31 states use the death penalty and 19 do not use it. In 2005, the U.S. Supreme Court struck down the death penalty for
juveniles. The U.S....show more content...
The upfront cost for a death penalty case is $1.26 million, and only $740,000 for a non–death penalty case. That is a big difference in price, obviously,
but over time, the death penalty cost is less than the life without parole price, $740,000 (Cost Of). That costs the people in the U.S. a lot of money,
just for people to go to jail or get put on death row. We as a country are in debt a lot of money, so we need to do everything we can from going into
debt more than we already are. It may not save us much, but it will show over time. That's a major pro of the death penalty because it could help our
country a

Persuasive Death Penalty
Persuasive Essay
Is the death penalty appropriate? Or should it be banned?
The death penalty is a very effective way of justice. It is appropriate for those who deserve it. It is often seen as a way of revenge even though it is a
punishment. The death penalty should be kept. Here are some reasons why.
The support of the death penalty has risen a lot during the past few years. North America's support rate is about 76%. The United States has a
percentage of 80%, Canada's 72%. With support rates that high, it seems as if everyone is all for justice. With high approval rate percentages from the
people why should the government get rid of it? While there are good things about the death penalty, there are also really bad things about it too....show
more content...
When the death penalty is used the Government and taxpayers have to pay higher taxes. The bad thing about putting someone in prison instead of the
death penalty is making space for those who did the crime. Most cases that don't end with the criminal/innocent being put to death cost about an
average of $740,000. You may think that this is a lot of money but the death penalty actually cost more. Cases that end with the criminal/innocent
receiving the death penalty cost about $1.26 million dollars. This causes taxpayers to pay about $90,000 more than just the criminal/innocent being put
in prison. This bad because there are 714 people on death row in just California. The supplies needed for the death penalty makes the cost go up more.
Some of the drugs needed for the death penalty cost a lot of money. Sodium thiopental, pancuronium bromide and potassium chloride, drugs needed for
the death penalty have went up to $83.55. Another drug called pentobarbital cost $1,286.86 per execution. So, when it comes to prices prison is
obviously the cheaper and smarter choice. So, the death penalty has a lot of good sides and a lot of negative sides to it but it should be kept. The price
is a lot but it's worth the cost if you think about it. Putting the person in jail comes with the possibility of them escaping. There should be other
punishments rather than the death penalty but until then the death penalty should be

There are diverse capital punishment, the death penalty is one of them. Considered as a deviant and barbaric act, the use of this method reflects
the opposite view or the wrong message of what the society teaches us. Encouraging the death penalty is not different from encouraging a murder
and by operating in such a way actually violates a fundamental law set forth by the federal government which is " Murder is an illegal crime". For
years, the death penalty has been seen as the best way to prevent assassination as it makes murderers reconsidering their ideas before they act.
However, this method will always be considered as barbaric since it takes someone's life. Moreover, we have learned through ages that death penalty
has, for a few times,taken innocent lives. Do not people deserve a second chance ? Anyone seeks for it.After all, the freedom of living is the most
basic human right that anyone dreams about. Nearly two–thirds of the countries throughout the world seem to understand how awful can this be for
death–row prisoners and their relatives.They decided to stop using the death penalty. It has been literally abolished. Many countries still using this
capital crime, as it is the case of the United States. The U.S government, the U.S military, and thirty–one States, including Indiana, have the death
penalty in their federal book. In Indiana, the death penalty is only imposed to whom the crime of murder has been attributed and if it violates at least
one of the

Persuasive Essay Against Death Penalty
Some people think that self–defense is justified by trying to save your own life but if the murder is committed on purpose, the murderer obviously
does not value life; therefore, why should he/she be allowed to live when they deprived another human being of this privilege, life? Other people
disagree and think that since the murderer does not value life and commits a crime, the law should not be taking the same path and contradict itself
by sentencing the murderer to death. Why kill people who kill people to show killing is wrong. Putting people to death to prove that we are against
killing does not make any sense. That statement contradicts the country's belief method. Thus, death penalty is wrong. The death penalty has been a
controversial issue for a long time, and has its pros as well as its cons. The way it is applied varies from state to state and depends on different
variables. Some may argue that death penalty punishment is inhumane, against most common religious beliefs, does not reduce the crime, costs a lot
more than life in prison, and worst of all, executions of innocent people, while others are convinced that it is the most effective and inexpensive
way of eliminating dangerous people from the society. However, at the end of the day, as a society we need to move away from the "eye for an eye"
revenge simply because it will not solve any problem and will not prove anything, the obvious is that by striking back at the enemy, the only outcome
is an endless cycle of violence. Death penalty sends the wrong message.
First, let's explain what death penalty is and go over its history. Death penalty is an act to put a person to death by law and a legal system to punish
and make sure the person does not commit any future crimes. Death penalty is referred to as capital punishment because historically it meant losing
one's head. Back in the eighteenth century, people were put to death if they were stealing, did not follow the religion from where they belonged,
disobeyed their king or even were thought to be a witch. They were publicly burned, hung or their head would be cut off to set an example. Nowadays,
types of executions have changed; the modern world uses mostly execution by lethal injection, which

Death Penalty Persuasive Essay
It was brought over from the United Kingdom and evolved into many different forms. Has been credited with killing one thousand four hundred sixty
three people since 1976. No, I'm not talking about a disease such as the bubonic plague, measles, and tuberculosis but about the death penalty. Since the
reinstatement of the death penalty in 1975 a debate has begun on whether we should or shouldn't support the death penalty. (Sentence on why people
support it or not)
One reason why people either agree or disagree with the death penalty is because of the cost. Contrary to popular belief it is actually cheaper to
imprison inmates for life than to execute them. According to a series of recent studies housing inmate for life without parole is ten of millions of
dollars cheaper than executing them. The reason why it's cheaper to house the inmates instead of executing them is because of the unique status of
the death penalty within the US justice system. The Constitution requires a long and complex judicial process for capital cases, including several
levels of mandatory review after a death sentence is issued. These appeals process takes decades to complete. Since most of all states have had budget
cuts and funding has been decreased it is now harder for states to get the required necessities to execute prisoners. So an increasing number politicians
are now considering abolishing capital punishment in favor of life imprisonment, out of financial necessity. "It's 10 times more

The Controversy Surrounding The Death Penalty
Professor O
Putting people to death, judged to have committed certain extremely heinous crimes, is a practice that's been around for along time. In the later half of
the twentieth century, it has become a controversial issue. As a supporter of the death penalty, I consider this to be a good thing for my country and its
citizens. Capital punishment deters crime. Statistics prove consisted application of the death penalty deter crime. No executed murdered has ever killed
again. For many years, Criminologists have thought to believe the death penalty has no affect as deterrence to homicides. From 1972–1976, a
suspension was place on capital punishment. The United States had 9,140 murders in 1960 where 56 people were executed. Nine years...show more
content...
Abolitionists claim life in prison is a justifiable punishment for murder. They say it violates the eighth amendment right which forbids "Cruel and
Unusual Punishment". Let's examine the issue. Our founding fathers have never clearly defined the eighth amendment. According to the Justice of the
Supreme Court, They say the death penalty is not cruel and/or unusual and is an acceptable form of punishment. Capital Punishment is morally
justified. A crime is only as severe as the punishment that follows it. As Edward Koch wants said, "It is by exacting the highest penalty for the taking
of human life that we affirm the highest value of human life." Abolitionists use the bible as a source of all morality and have taken many quotations
from the bible out of context. One example abolitionists use is Matthews 7:1 Jesus said, "Judge not, that you be not judged" to say the death penalty
contradicts Christian values. In order for us to sentence someone to death we have to judge them. If you look at the whole picture, Jesus was saying
"Judge not, that you be judged. For with what judgment you judge, you will be judged; and with the measure you use, it will be measured back to
you. And why do you look at the speck in your brother's eye, but do not consider the plank in your own eye? Or how can you say to your brother, 'Let
me remove the speck from your eye'; and look, a plank is in your own eye?

Why the Death Penalty Should Be Abolished Essay
Why the Death Penalty Should Be Abolished
Why should the death penalty be abolished? The death penalty should be abolished because of many reasons. Many people believe the saying, 'an
eye for an eye'. But when will people realize that just because someone may have killed a loved one that the best thing for that person is to die also.
People don't realize that they are putting the blood of another person life on their hands. This makes them just as guilty as the person who committed
the crime: the only difference is that they didn't use weapon except their mouth to kill them. The death penalty should be abolished because it is racist,
punishes the poor, condemns those who are innocent to death, and is a cruel punishment....show more content...
A Georgia study found that killers of whites are 4.3 times more likely to receive a death sentence than killers of blacks. More than 75 percent of those
on federal death row are non–white. Of the 156 federal death penalty prosecutions approved by the Attorney General since 1988, 74 percent of the
defendants were non–white (governmentguide.com) . This shows that there is something definitely wrong with the judicial system. If this isn?t enough
to convince you that the death penalty is wrong. Then people may need to look at other reasons.
The death penalty, does not only show unequal rights, but it also punishes the poor. It shows in recent studies that if an inmate can afford good legal
representation, they might can get a lesser charge than death row. It also shows that ninety percent of defendants cannot afford to hire an experienced
criminal defense lawyer. Since they cannot afford to hire one, they are forced to use inexperienced court–appointed attorneys that are being underpaid
for their services. The less the court–appointed attorneys make, the less they want to make their defense so that they can get rid of this case, and start
back making their usual amount of money.
There has been many inmates sentenced to death row that innocent. Since 1973, more than 99 people have been released from prison after being
sentenced to death despite their innocence, The Social Psychology of Police Interrogation: The

Persuasive Speech On Death Penalty
I am here to talk to you today about why the death penalty should be abolished in the United States. The death penalty itself is a very controversial
topic because it violates the moral and ethical code most citizens of the United States share. Most other countries do not have the death penalty, and
only 31 states in the US administer the death penalty as a form of punishment for heinous crimes. I understand it is justified in the sense that criminals
are receiving what they inflicted on others, but is there really a fair process for deciding who gets the death penalty and who doesn't? Or in deciding
who waits on death row longer than someone else? I believe the death penalty should be abolished by the United States because it is biased, violates the
moral and ethical code of most people, and completely disregards certain amendments of the United States Constitution such as the fifth and eighth.
Traditionally, the justice system has been biased and skewed in more ways than one. The death penalty is a prime example of this racial injustice.
According to Amnesty International, "77% of death row inmates were executed for the killing of white victims, even though African Americans make
up half of all the homicide victims" ("Death Penalty and Race – Amnesty International USA"). An example of this claim is the story of George Stinney.
On June 16, 1944, in Columbia, South Carolina, a 14 year old African American boy named George Stinney was executed by electric chair after he
was convicted for the murder of two young white girls. Stinney was interrogated with no lawyer present and was believed to have been forced into
confessing, which now is apparent. He was convicted in less than ten minutes by an all white jury. 70 years after his execution, the state of South
Carolina exonerated him and issued an apology to his family for his wrongful conviction and execution (Bever 2014). The next point I am going to
talk about is how the federal government claims that deaths by the lethal injection are quick and painless. There are plenty of problems that could
occur with the administering of the drugs. For example, the mixture of drugs could be wrong; the direction of the flow of injection can be wrong if
those administering

The Death penalty has been a part of society and its legal system for centuries; it became a necessary punishment to dangerous crimes and a way to
liberate the community from dangerous criminals. However, now this type of punishment is seen as crime against humanistic values by many, and is
questionable in the legal system. It has resulted in a range of inconsistency with the laws on this issue. Nations including China, the US, Iran, Belarus,
and others keep the death penalty as an option, while others like Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and almost all European nations have put an to capital
punishment. This paper will seeks to demonstrate that death penalty has been preserved as a valid means of preventing serious crimes. It will explore
...show more content...
Compared to 260 in China and 230 in Iran, becoming the runner–up with a total number of 159 (Wikipedia). For most nations, the death penalty is used
to punish war crimes or crimes resulting in physical injury. In Asia, the death penalty is used to punish drug–related crimes, even though these crimes
do not result in physical injury.
The anti–death penalty movement calls to repeal this measure that has been upheld by various international organizations. For instance, "the United
Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child, which among other things forbids capital punishment for juveniles, has been signed and ratified by all
countries except the USA and Somalia" (Wikipedia). Some international representative such as the Second Optional Protocol to the International
Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, and the Sixth Protocol to the European Convention on Human Rights have been accepted, although they only
bind nations that have endorse them. Organizations like the European Union require new members to prohibit the death penalty as a condition of entry.
There is a powerful movement with tremendous pressure on nations to cancel it. Currently there are two prominent organizations fighting against the
death penalty, they are the Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch.
The issues surrounding the discussion of death penalty focus on two main points. First, this punishment is assets from a purely utilitarian perspective.
In order to understand and

A Persuasive Speech On The Death Penalty
Persuasive Speech:
Why I Believe the Death Penalty Should Be Abolished Hello, everyone. My name is Devlin O'Connell and I am going to be speaking to you today
about why I believe the death penalty should be abolished. There are three factors that I base this argument off which surround ethics, efficiency, and
expenditure. In relationship to ethics, I would like to begin with a quote by human rights activist, Desmond Tutu, "To take a life when a life has been
lost is revenge, not justice." Capital Punishment, also known as the Death Penalty, is described as a government practice where a person is put to death
by the state as a punishment for crimes such as murder, treason, espionage, and genocide. While it may seem unlikely that many people would be
convicted of a few of the latter crimes, there were nearly 3,000 people on death row in the last year. Of those 3,000 people, 117 were found to be
innocent. It is predicted that at least 3% more of those sentenced would have been exonerated with enough time and resources. Let that sink in. An
untold number of innocent people have been executed. As it is, many relatives of victims have said that they do not wish for their relative's killer to be
put to death. Circling back to Tutu's quote, the government is not providing these families with justice – but with revenge.
We are "perpetuating a cycle of violence unworthy of a civilized society," to quote Bernice King, "retribution cannot light the way to the genuine
healing that

Ethos On Death Penalty
The death penalty has been a huge part of many political debates for the past few decades. There are two sides, those for and those against its
continued use and both have logical arguments. My research question is if it is ethical and or beneficial for the U.S. government to continue using the
death penalty? To gain the attention of my audience, I am going to share two stories that my sources have on those with experience in the debate. The
Forbes article, "Considering The Death Penalty: Your Tax Dollars At Work," is an anti
–death penalty piece explaining how an innocent man was on
death row and his opinion on whether or not it should be used. He said in the piece that living out a life sentence without parole is worse than being
executed....show more content...
One, saying it is inhumane and should not be done and the other side says that it is necessary in our society. Some of the non–biased sources go over
just the statistics of the death penalty. This includes "DEATH PENALTY INFORMATION CENTER Facts about the Death Penalty" and "Should
the Death Penalty Be Allowed?". The first article explains the costs associated with the punishment, how much it is used, states that use it, and
people on death row. The second piece gives unbiased statistics on the pros and cons on the death penalty. By providing this background, I hope
my audience will be more aware of the debate and have more information. I will then incorporate a few more factual based articles to try and
provide all the necessary details, such as "Death Penalty Pro Con" and a few more biased articles then to get opinions going. I feel that all my
sources work well together as even when the articles have different viewpoints, they do not contradict one another much. Basically, they highlight the
importance of their own arguments and do not really go after the other side. Overall, I feel that I have the sources necessary to write this piece.
However, I do feel that having a few more scholarly articles will only help my

Persuasive Essay Pro Death Penalty
The death penalty is a form of punishment, which is given to a felon that has committed a major crime and requires for the criminal to be sentenced to
death. Capital punishment was a custom of the government and society for thousands of years as a way to "justify" the crimes of felons and is
unfortunately is still present in communities around the world. The death penalty is frequently a form of punishment in asian and middle eastern
countries and still resides in parts of the USA also.
Capital punishment affects many lives including the very criminals who are sentenced to death. Not only is the death penalty an immoral way to pay
for a crime, but the very method is inhumane. Lethal injection is the most popular form of execution in the...show more content...
This punishment is given as a consequence to a person who has committed a major felony and the government feels that the only way to condone the
crime is to pay the forfeit of his life. Capital punishment is believed to act like a deterrence to criminals, but according to the US Census in 2006,
South Carolina, which inhabits the punishment is number one in violent crime rates, with 766 crimes per every 100,000 people, while the state of
Maine that does not have the death penalty ranks 50th in all the states with an outstanding 116 violent crimes per every 100,000 population. In addition,
a recent study of the United States top criminologists proved that the death penalty does not deter violent crimes. The study in the Journal of Criminal
Law and Criminology states that 88% of the US' most prestigious criminologist believed that the death penalty did not prevent homicide and 75% of the
experts surveyed agreed that "debates about the death penalty distract Congress and state legislatures from focusing on real solutions to crime
problems". This demonstrates that despite the death penalty, crimes are still present and not only does it remain to make an impact on these felonies, it
shows that the places without the penalty are much more prosperous with their crime

Persuasive Essay On Death Penalty
Cody Johnson
10/15/2017
death penalty essay
The death penalty
The death penalty is a prosecute that is used to kill criminals that have committed crimes that are so bad they should not be left alive. The idea of
putting another human to death is hard to completely fathom. The physical mechanics involved in the act of execution are easy to grasp, but the
emotions involved in carrying out a death sentence on another person, regardless of how much they deserve it, is beyond my understanding. Knowing
that it must be painful, dehumanizing, and sickening. The Eight Amendment says" Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed,
nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted" (Constitutions). And for the article Changing Views one rate has gone down at a steady from the 1990
to now and that they death penalty is sometimes necessary, and it is our responsibility as a society to see that it is done.
In the death penalty, they way that you get put to trial for the death penalty you must have
As a result of the research, the death penalty should be stopped and the states money should be used for other things.
Problem paragraph
The problem with the death penalty is that it is a big waste of money. Yes, in some cases it can make people feel better, like they are getting revenge
on the people that did the crime to their loved one or someone they know but that is really cruel. In the article, The Price of Justice it shows how the
price were a few years ago and it can only of up from there "in 1988, The Miami Herald reported that the cost of the death penalty in Florida was
$3.2 million per execution compared to $600,000 for life imprisonment.103 Similarly, The Dallas Morning News reported in 1992 that the trials
and appeals of a capital case alone cost Texas $2.3 million per case on average". Making the criminal sit in a jail cell that is not that big with other
bad people is more of a punishment then just killing them. And it is a lot cheaper to do it that way as well. The cost of the death penalty is not
reasonable because the state can't even perform the death penalty the right way. And we can use the money for better things for our states and for our
society so we can improve our comity's so

Persuasive Essay Pro Death Penalty
The death penalty is a punishment given to criminals who the jury find worthy of the death penalty. There are many different ways to earn the penalty
and it can be taken to trial multiple times before actually occurring to the person. While some people are brought to great stress at this charge, There
are many people who have been given peace from this punishment. A benefit to having theDeath Penalty is that once the criminal is disposed of, they
will no longer be a threat to the world, they will no longer be able to commit to their crimes to do the world around them harm. If the criminal had
raped and murdered 15 victims, it would be safer for the world around the victims families, and the communities around them if the person committed

Death Penalty Persuasive Speech

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Featured

Featured (20)

Death Penalty Persuasive Speech