Paper Writing Service - HelpWriting.net 👈

1. Anti-Death Penalty Essay
Anti–Death Penalty
History: The death penalty is not a new idea in our world. Its origins date back 3,700 years to the Babylonian civilization, where it was prescribed
for a variety of crimes (Kronenwetter p.10). It was also greatly used in the Greek and Roman empires. In ancient Roman and Mosaic Law they
believed in the rule of "eye for and eye." The most famous executions of the past included Socrates and Jesus (Wilson p.13). It continued into England
during the Middle Ages and then to the American colonies where it exist still today. In the colonies, death was a punishment for crimes of murder,
arson, and perjury. Although today the death penalty is used for murder.
Common ways of execution in the past where...show more content...
Georgia, (408 U.S. 238). This case was the first time the Supreme Court ruled against the death penalty (http://www.time.com/time/magagzine/archive
/1994/940523.crime.html). The rule was a vote of 5 to 4 by the jury. "The dissenting Justices argued that the courts had no right to challenge legislative
judgment on the effectiveness and justice of punishments. The majority however held that it was not the actual death penalty that was cruel and
unusual punishment, but rather the judicial process, which determined who would receive the death penalty sentence. This process violates the Eighth
and Fourteenth Amendment. They decided some factors should be considered before giving a criminal this sentences such as a separate trial for
sentencing, the viciousness of the crime, and environment factors like the criminal's background" (http://www.time.com/time/magagzine/archive/1994
/940523.crime.html). Due to the way this case was done it created three options for the use of the death penalty. The three options where, mandatory
death sentences for certain crimes, development of standardized guidelines for juries and outright abolition (http://www2.law.cornell.edu/cgi–bin
/foliocgi.exe/historic/query=[group+.../pageitems=[body]).
This was a stop to the death penalty until the case of Gregg Vs. Georgia, (428 U.S. 153). In this case the Georgia Supreme Court reviewed the rights of
constitution and how the
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

2. Is the Death Penalty Ethical? Essay examples
"More than 4,500 people have been executed in the United States since 1930. There is no way of knowing how many have been executed in U.S.
history because executions were often local affairs, with no central agency keeping track of them (Maloney, 1999)." Over 4,500 people were
executed and this doesn't even include the unreported deaths. Decades ago, death penalty cases were not even to be reported in many times. For
many years, people have been rationalize themselves for death penalty as " an eye for an eye"(2010).This "eye for an eye" statement is no longer
giving any excuses for killing humans. The controversial idea of whether humans are rational enough to decide someone's life or death has been
questioned. Humans absolutely don't have...show more content...
People who commit the crime should get imprisoned for what they did for how long ever it is given. Murderer who took away other's lives should
be imprisoned for what they did for the rest of their lives. Death penalty is absolutely not necessary because imprison itself will take away the whole
lives; they will not be allowed to have any life as human in society. We kill him, because he killed is simply how death penalty works. Death penalty
is only to take away people's life, not reasonable punishment for their sin. Of course, people think death penalty is not just about the punishment.
People who believe in death penalty show the reason why they do is that death penalty for sure is a deterrent to homicide. They also take this as a
justification of supporting death penalty system (2010). So people actually expect something out of this system other than just killing the murderers
simply for what they did. This is supposed to be a great solution to make better society by lessoning the potential crime. In theory, the fact that society
has a death penalty system should somewhat scares the potential murderer and prevents them from committing murder. But the percentage of murder
crime shows the otherwise. Do potential murderers consider the death penalty before they the murder? The answers are likely to be No. "Most
deterrence research has found that
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

3. Against the Death Penalty Essay
When you turn on the television, radio, or simply open the local newspaper, you are bombarded with news of arrests, murders, homicides, and other
tragedies. There are many things that I don't agree with in today's society but, out of all the wrong doing that takes place, I believe murder including
the death penalty is the worst of them. I am strongly against the death penalty because it violates God's rules, costs the tax payers too much money, and
possibly the "wrongly accused," may have to die because of the cruel and unusual punishment of the death penalty. How often do these concepts get into
the public's mind when it hears of our 'fair, trusty' government taking away someone's breathing rights? Do we honestly want people thinking of...show
more content...
I believe that religious beliefs are the corner stone for our law system, especially since our country was built to escape religious execution.
Executing someone should not be made an exception to God's rules. My next reason for being against the death penalty is the fact that taxpayers
waste too much of their money with the death penalty. The average death penalty case is appealed at least three times. This means that "we", the
taxpayers, must pay for the same trial to be heard at least three times. After a while this adds up and becomes expensive. Also, the average convicted
murderer spends 12 years on death row. If people who support the death penalty are positive enough to kill the person for committing the crime,
shouldn't the supporters be confident enough to execute them in right then? Why spend everyone else's money keeping these inmates in jail? Our
money should be spent to help better society, not to accommodate the prisoners that are going to end up dead anyways. There's always the chance of
an innocent person being in the wrong place at the wrong time. A little bit of evidence and a good lawyer could sentence someone to life in prison,
and maybe even the death penalty. Some innocent person could be spending and or possibly ending his life in captivity for just walking down the
wrong street on the wrong day. That person does not deserve to serve the time that's not rightfully his and take the needle that shouldn't
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

4. Ethos On Death Penalty
The death penalty has been a huge part of many political debates for the past few decades. There are two sides, those for and those against its
continued use and both have logical arguments. My research question is if it is ethical and or beneficial for the U.S. government to continue using the
death penalty? To gain the attention of my audience, I am going to share two stories that my sources have on those with experience in the debate. The
Forbes article, "Considering The Death Penalty: Your Tax Dollars At Work," is an anti
–death penalty piece explaining how an innocent man was on
death row and his opinion on whether or not it should be used. He said in the piece that living out a life sentence without parole is worse than being
executed....show more content...
One, saying it is inhumane and should not be done and the other side says that it is necessary in our society. Some of the non–biased sources go over
just the statistics of the death penalty. This includes "DEATH PENALTY INFORMATION CENTER Facts about the Death Penalty" and "Should
the Death Penalty Be Allowed?". The first article explains the costs associated with the punishment, how much it is used, states that use it, and
people on death row. The second piece gives unbiased statistics on the pros and cons on the death penalty. By providing this background, I hope
my audience will be more aware of the debate and have more information. I will then incorporate a few more factual based articles to try and
provide all the necessary details, such as "Death Penalty Pro Con" and a few more biased articles then to get opinions going. I feel that all my
sources work well together as even when the articles have different viewpoints, they do not contradict one another much. Basically, they highlight the
importance of their own arguments and do not really go after the other side. Overall, I feel that I have the sources necessary to write this piece.
However, I do feel that having a few more scholarly articles will only help my
Get more content on HelpWriting.net