Rapid Care Analysis
for development programs

Initial Findings and Methodology

Thalia Kidder

October 2013
WHY CARE?
Investing in care…
•

Has a widespread, long-term, positive impact on wellbeing and
development

•

Is critical to address inequality and vulnerability

Page 3
Our approach
•
•
•

•

Recognise* care work
Reduce difficult, inefficient tasks
Redistribute responsibility for care more
equitably - from women to men, and from
families to the State/employers
Representation of carers in decision-making

… as a precondition for achieving
women‟s political, social and
economic empowerment, and
addressing poverty and inequality

* “Three Rs of Unpaid Work” Prof. Diane Elson 2008
Page 4
Organisational challenges

“I don’t know
how to start”

“I‟m funded to
do something
else”

“It‟s hard to
show positive
impact”
“Care is a culturally
sensitive, private
issue”
“It‟s a long-term,
complicated
process”

?

“My manager and
the donor aren‟t
convinced”
“I want to do
advocacy work
but I have no
evidence”
“I have very
little time or
money…”
“Focus on a
women’s issue
in a mixed
group??”
Page 5
Principles and purpose
Rapid Care Analysis (RCA) is a 1-2 day exercise with focus groups of
12-20 women and men, a first step to addressing care in development.
RCA is designed to show that „care‟ is ….

•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•

Significant: Collects evidence of the problems;
quantitative data, stories and visual outputs
Relevant: Improves impact of wider initiatives
Feasible: Practical proposals for short term
Appealing: Men involved; addressing care is a
„societal issue‟ about well-being
Compelling: Leads to transformational change
Flexible: In a range of cultures/programmes
Workable: Simple, user-friendly exercises
Inspiring: RCA aims to „open the door‟ – get
more people and projects interested in care

RCA focus group in the
Philippines

Page 6
RAPID CARE ANALYSIS – WHAT DOES
IT LOOK LIKE?
STEP 1: Exploring relationships of care
•
•
•

What do we mean by „care work‟?
Whom do you care for?
Who cares for you and others?

Page 8
STEP 2: Unpaid & paid work activities
•
•

34

Identify work activities of women and men
Estimate average weekly hours spent on types of work
Housework and care of
family members: 31.3
h/wk

Care in others‟
homes: 2.9
h/wk

6.5

6.5 h/wk

Unpaid
agricultural
work for home
Agricultural
work for market

Unpaid
care work
Colombia:

Unpaid
community
work

Women’s 79-hr
average work
week

21 h/wk
Enterprise

9.5
Community activities
(village meetings,
volunteer health
work): 4.6 h/wk

Community service
(maintaining roads, water
ducts and collective
crops): 4.8 h/wk

29

8.3 h/wk

Page 9
STEP 3: Gender roles, changes & problems of care
Three focus groups – adapted to the context:
•

Gender and age analysis of care activities

•

Changes affecting care provision, e.g. migration, displacement,
drought, flood, conflict or government policy changes

•

Identify most „problematic‟ care activities, especially for women
Time burden

Limits
mobility

Affects carer’s
health

Preparing meals

lll

ll

lll

Providing moral
support

l

l

l

Cleaning House

ll

l

l

lll

lll

l

Nursing ill
people

Page 10
STEP 4: Options to reduce and redistribute
Community map of infrastructure and services that support care
Society provides care with „care diamond‟*: state, market, community, family
Examples:
• Water supply
• Electricity, fuel
• Washing facilities
• Health services
• Schools, childcare
• Grain mills, oil presses
• Shops
• Services for elderly, disabled or
HIV+ people
• Relatives
• Value of care in beliefs

* Shara Razavi 2007
Page 11
STEP 4: Options to reduce and redistribute care
•

Identify and prioritize options to address the problems of care provision

• Funding or
investment needed?
• External support?
• Social acceptance?
• Impact – how much
time saved for
women? Health
benefit? Mobility?

Page 12
FINDINGS FROM PROGRAMMES
USING RAPID CARE ANALYSIS
Where we’re doing Rapid Care Analysis
Honduras
Copan: OCDIH, Nuevo
Amanecer, beans and
cornflour marketing
project

Guatemala
Rural Women's
Alliance, food security
campaign

Colombia
Patugó: Women‟s
agricultural enterprise
project

UK
Bristol: Single Parents
Action Network, protecting
the rights and life chances
of single-parent families on
job-seeking benefits

Nicaragua
Chinandega,
Chontales, Leon:
Rural Women's
Coordination

Tanzania
Kishapu, Shinyanga:
Sustainable livelihoods
and sisal project

OPT
Gaza: Food processing
and ICT enterprise
development projects

Azerbaijan
Barda: „SMART‟
agricultural livelihoods
project and ending
violence against
women initiative
Bangladesh
Gaibandha: Gazaria
Union, sustainable
livelihoods in chillies

Philippines
Lanao del Sur,
Mindanao: Al Mujadilah
Development
Foundation (AMDF),
integral development

Sri Lanka
Omanthai and
Nedunkerney:
Sustainable livelihoods
in paddy and dairy
Page 14
Azerbaijan
Bangladesh
Colombia
Honduras

Page 15

Women's care work

Women's work

Men's care work

Women's care work

Men's work

Women's work

Men's care work

Women's care work

Women's work

Men's care work

Women's care work

Men's work

Women's work

Men's care work

Women's care work

Men's work

Women's work

Hours of (care) work per week – women and men
160

140

120

100

80

60

40

20

0

Tanzania
Tasks most impacting carers’ mobility, time, health

Childcare

Collecting Taking care Taking care Collecting
fuel and
of the
of husband
water;
preparing
elderly
/ extended
washing
meals
family
clothes

Cleaning

Protecting
the house
(staying at
home)

Azerbaijan
Bangladesh
Honduras
Nicaragua
OPT
Philippines
Sri Lanka
Tanzania
Page 16

Moving
during
flooding
Gaps identified in infrastructure and services

Water systems

Electricity

Childcare and
Health and
Transportation
play facilities social services and school
bus

Azerbaijan
Bangladesh
Colombia
Honduras

Nicaragua
OPT
Philippines
Sri Lanka
Tanzania
Page 17

Technology to
improve
cleaning and
cooking
How does care work affect programmes?
“Women have 8.5 hrs of care work a day;
men do only 1 hr. In the chilli harvest,
women work 2-3 hrs more, reducing
time for personal care and sleep –
usually only 6.5 hrs. If we don‟t reduce or
share care tasks, the project cuts into the
limited sleep and personal time of the
women we are trying to empower."Oxfam
staff, Bangladesh
“Having less care work for women
would definitely increase the
productivity of enterprises.
Women would be able to earn
more money and join activities
outside the house if there were
childcare available.” RCA
participants, OPT
Page 18
How does care work affect programmes?
“Most programmes lose
women’s participation because
of conflict with care activities. We
need to get more support from
the community and better
infrastructure from authorities.”
Oxfam staff, Sri Lanka
“Women have to collect water three
times a day walking 4km each
way, so while men can take sisal
harvest to the processing plant
twice a day, women can only go
once! We won't reach our desired
goals on economic and gender
justice if we ignore unequal care
work.” Oxfam staff, Tanzania
Page 19
Proposals and next steps – practical / quick
• Technology to decrease fuel and
time needed for meal preparation
and cooking (corn mill, dough
machine, improved/gas stoves,
refrigerators, pressure cooker ) –
Bangladesh, Colombia, Honduras,
OPT
• Household water systems –
Bangladesh, Philippines, Tanzania
• Technology to decrease time
cleaning and washing clothes
(drainage, washing machines, dryers,
vacuums) – Azerbaijan, Bangladesh,
Colombia, OPT, Sri Lanka
• Car to decrease time taken to buy
food shopping – OPT
• Recreational activities and psychosocial support from friends and
family to lower stress levels –
Colombia

RCA focus group in
Azerbaijan

Page 20
Proposals and next steps – gender relations

RCA focus group in
Tanzania

• Sharing care work with partners –
Bangladesh, OPT, Philippines, Sri
Lanka
• Sharing care work with other family
members – Colombia, Honduras,
OPT
• Cooking lessons for men –
Philippines
• Household discussions on sharing
care work – Colombia, Honduras,
Philippines, Sri Lanka
• Community discussions,
workshops and campaigns on
sharing care work – Honduras,
Philippines, Sri Lanka

Page 21
Proposals and next steps – advocacy
• Installing water pumps – Azerbaijan,
Philippines
• Installing electricity – Honduras,
Philippines, Sri Lanka
• Providing childcare services –
Azerbaijan, Colombia, Honduras, OPT,
Philippines
• Improving healthcare and sanitation
services – OPT, Philippines
• Providing public parks where children
can spend time safely – OPT
• Building capacity to improve and
enforce laws on labour and women’s
rights – OPT
• Providing a bus service to take children
to and from school – Sri Lanka
• Raising awareness on family planning
– Bangladesh

RCA focus group in
Colombia

Page 22
Participants’ comments on Rapid Care Analysis
“Women are really
overburdened; something
has to be done about this”
– Imam, Mindanao,
Philippines

“We are thankful to have seen
and understood the unequal
contribution of men and
women at household level.”
Men‟s group, Philippines

“We need to include young
people, boys and girls, in
the exercises.”
Bangladesh, Azerbaijan

“In the community map we
need to capture danger –
mobility is restricted due to
land mines, and from staying
in the house to avoid theft.”
Sri Lanka, Honduras

“Some participants have
managed to renegotiate
care activities with their
husbands and family
members.” Colombia

Page 23
Find out more…

www.oxfam.org.uk/care

Co-authors RCA Methodology & Guidance: Thalia Kidder and Carine Pionetti.
Communications: Imogen Davies
Contributors: Valeria Esquivel, Rosa Garwood, Nupur Kukrety, Roxanne Murrell, Hector Ortega, Catrina Pickering, Rosa Pasquier Urbina, Laura Phelps, Felipe Ramiro,
Lauren Ravon, Kate Raworth, Adriana Rodriguez, Jo Rowlands, Hugo Sintes, Ines Smyth, Caroline Sweetman, Jo Villanueva, Martin Walsh, and Phillipa Young.
For reports also thanks to: Norul Amin, Ala„a Eid, Sonali Gunasekera, Maite Matheu, Gunel Mehdiyeva, Celeste Molina, Zahria Mapandi, Shija Msikula, Jing Pura and
Shanmugaratnam Senthuran.
Page 24
Photo credits: Oxfam.
FOR A POWERPOINT VERSION OF
THIS PRESENTATION PLEASE EMAIL
THALIA KIDDER:
TKIDDER@OXFAM.ORG.UK

Rapid Care Analysis - Oxfam's practical tool for local development programmes. Methodology and initial findings.

  • 1.
    Rapid Care Analysis fordevelopment programs Initial Findings and Methodology Thalia Kidder October 2013
  • 2.
  • 3.
    Investing in care… • Hasa widespread, long-term, positive impact on wellbeing and development • Is critical to address inequality and vulnerability Page 3
  • 4.
    Our approach • • • • Recognise* carework Reduce difficult, inefficient tasks Redistribute responsibility for care more equitably - from women to men, and from families to the State/employers Representation of carers in decision-making … as a precondition for achieving women‟s political, social and economic empowerment, and addressing poverty and inequality * “Three Rs of Unpaid Work” Prof. Diane Elson 2008 Page 4
  • 5.
    Organisational challenges “I don’tknow how to start” “I‟m funded to do something else” “It‟s hard to show positive impact” “Care is a culturally sensitive, private issue” “It‟s a long-term, complicated process” ? “My manager and the donor aren‟t convinced” “I want to do advocacy work but I have no evidence” “I have very little time or money…” “Focus on a women’s issue in a mixed group??” Page 5
  • 6.
    Principles and purpose RapidCare Analysis (RCA) is a 1-2 day exercise with focus groups of 12-20 women and men, a first step to addressing care in development. RCA is designed to show that „care‟ is …. • • • • • • • • Significant: Collects evidence of the problems; quantitative data, stories and visual outputs Relevant: Improves impact of wider initiatives Feasible: Practical proposals for short term Appealing: Men involved; addressing care is a „societal issue‟ about well-being Compelling: Leads to transformational change Flexible: In a range of cultures/programmes Workable: Simple, user-friendly exercises Inspiring: RCA aims to „open the door‟ – get more people and projects interested in care RCA focus group in the Philippines Page 6
  • 7.
    RAPID CARE ANALYSIS– WHAT DOES IT LOOK LIKE?
  • 8.
    STEP 1: Exploringrelationships of care • • • What do we mean by „care work‟? Whom do you care for? Who cares for you and others? Page 8
  • 9.
    STEP 2: Unpaid& paid work activities • • 34 Identify work activities of women and men Estimate average weekly hours spent on types of work Housework and care of family members: 31.3 h/wk Care in others‟ homes: 2.9 h/wk 6.5 6.5 h/wk Unpaid agricultural work for home Agricultural work for market Unpaid care work Colombia: Unpaid community work Women’s 79-hr average work week 21 h/wk Enterprise 9.5 Community activities (village meetings, volunteer health work): 4.6 h/wk Community service (maintaining roads, water ducts and collective crops): 4.8 h/wk 29 8.3 h/wk Page 9
  • 10.
    STEP 3: Genderroles, changes & problems of care Three focus groups – adapted to the context: • Gender and age analysis of care activities • Changes affecting care provision, e.g. migration, displacement, drought, flood, conflict or government policy changes • Identify most „problematic‟ care activities, especially for women Time burden Limits mobility Affects carer’s health Preparing meals lll ll lll Providing moral support l l l Cleaning House ll l l lll lll l Nursing ill people Page 10
  • 11.
    STEP 4: Optionsto reduce and redistribute Community map of infrastructure and services that support care Society provides care with „care diamond‟*: state, market, community, family Examples: • Water supply • Electricity, fuel • Washing facilities • Health services • Schools, childcare • Grain mills, oil presses • Shops • Services for elderly, disabled or HIV+ people • Relatives • Value of care in beliefs * Shara Razavi 2007 Page 11
  • 12.
    STEP 4: Optionsto reduce and redistribute care • Identify and prioritize options to address the problems of care provision • Funding or investment needed? • External support? • Social acceptance? • Impact – how much time saved for women? Health benefit? Mobility? Page 12
  • 13.
    FINDINGS FROM PROGRAMMES USINGRAPID CARE ANALYSIS
  • 14.
    Where we’re doingRapid Care Analysis Honduras Copan: OCDIH, Nuevo Amanecer, beans and cornflour marketing project Guatemala Rural Women's Alliance, food security campaign Colombia Patugó: Women‟s agricultural enterprise project UK Bristol: Single Parents Action Network, protecting the rights and life chances of single-parent families on job-seeking benefits Nicaragua Chinandega, Chontales, Leon: Rural Women's Coordination Tanzania Kishapu, Shinyanga: Sustainable livelihoods and sisal project OPT Gaza: Food processing and ICT enterprise development projects Azerbaijan Barda: „SMART‟ agricultural livelihoods project and ending violence against women initiative Bangladesh Gaibandha: Gazaria Union, sustainable livelihoods in chillies Philippines Lanao del Sur, Mindanao: Al Mujadilah Development Foundation (AMDF), integral development Sri Lanka Omanthai and Nedunkerney: Sustainable livelihoods in paddy and dairy Page 14
  • 15.
    Azerbaijan Bangladesh Colombia Honduras Page 15 Women's carework Women's work Men's care work Women's care work Men's work Women's work Men's care work Women's care work Women's work Men's care work Women's care work Men's work Women's work Men's care work Women's care work Men's work Women's work Hours of (care) work per week – women and men 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 Tanzania
  • 16.
    Tasks most impactingcarers’ mobility, time, health Childcare Collecting Taking care Taking care Collecting fuel and of the of husband water; preparing elderly / extended washing meals family clothes Cleaning Protecting the house (staying at home) Azerbaijan Bangladesh Honduras Nicaragua OPT Philippines Sri Lanka Tanzania Page 16 Moving during flooding
  • 17.
    Gaps identified ininfrastructure and services Water systems Electricity Childcare and Health and Transportation play facilities social services and school bus Azerbaijan Bangladesh Colombia Honduras Nicaragua OPT Philippines Sri Lanka Tanzania Page 17 Technology to improve cleaning and cooking
  • 18.
    How does carework affect programmes? “Women have 8.5 hrs of care work a day; men do only 1 hr. In the chilli harvest, women work 2-3 hrs more, reducing time for personal care and sleep – usually only 6.5 hrs. If we don‟t reduce or share care tasks, the project cuts into the limited sleep and personal time of the women we are trying to empower."Oxfam staff, Bangladesh “Having less care work for women would definitely increase the productivity of enterprises. Women would be able to earn more money and join activities outside the house if there were childcare available.” RCA participants, OPT Page 18
  • 19.
    How does carework affect programmes? “Most programmes lose women’s participation because of conflict with care activities. We need to get more support from the community and better infrastructure from authorities.” Oxfam staff, Sri Lanka “Women have to collect water three times a day walking 4km each way, so while men can take sisal harvest to the processing plant twice a day, women can only go once! We won't reach our desired goals on economic and gender justice if we ignore unequal care work.” Oxfam staff, Tanzania Page 19
  • 20.
    Proposals and nextsteps – practical / quick • Technology to decrease fuel and time needed for meal preparation and cooking (corn mill, dough machine, improved/gas stoves, refrigerators, pressure cooker ) – Bangladesh, Colombia, Honduras, OPT • Household water systems – Bangladesh, Philippines, Tanzania • Technology to decrease time cleaning and washing clothes (drainage, washing machines, dryers, vacuums) – Azerbaijan, Bangladesh, Colombia, OPT, Sri Lanka • Car to decrease time taken to buy food shopping – OPT • Recreational activities and psychosocial support from friends and family to lower stress levels – Colombia RCA focus group in Azerbaijan Page 20
  • 21.
    Proposals and nextsteps – gender relations RCA focus group in Tanzania • Sharing care work with partners – Bangladesh, OPT, Philippines, Sri Lanka • Sharing care work with other family members – Colombia, Honduras, OPT • Cooking lessons for men – Philippines • Household discussions on sharing care work – Colombia, Honduras, Philippines, Sri Lanka • Community discussions, workshops and campaigns on sharing care work – Honduras, Philippines, Sri Lanka Page 21
  • 22.
    Proposals and nextsteps – advocacy • Installing water pumps – Azerbaijan, Philippines • Installing electricity – Honduras, Philippines, Sri Lanka • Providing childcare services – Azerbaijan, Colombia, Honduras, OPT, Philippines • Improving healthcare and sanitation services – OPT, Philippines • Providing public parks where children can spend time safely – OPT • Building capacity to improve and enforce laws on labour and women’s rights – OPT • Providing a bus service to take children to and from school – Sri Lanka • Raising awareness on family planning – Bangladesh RCA focus group in Colombia Page 22
  • 23.
    Participants’ comments onRapid Care Analysis “Women are really overburdened; something has to be done about this” – Imam, Mindanao, Philippines “We are thankful to have seen and understood the unequal contribution of men and women at household level.” Men‟s group, Philippines “We need to include young people, boys and girls, in the exercises.” Bangladesh, Azerbaijan “In the community map we need to capture danger – mobility is restricted due to land mines, and from staying in the house to avoid theft.” Sri Lanka, Honduras “Some participants have managed to renegotiate care activities with their husbands and family members.” Colombia Page 23
  • 24.
    Find out more… www.oxfam.org.uk/care Co-authorsRCA Methodology & Guidance: Thalia Kidder and Carine Pionetti. Communications: Imogen Davies Contributors: Valeria Esquivel, Rosa Garwood, Nupur Kukrety, Roxanne Murrell, Hector Ortega, Catrina Pickering, Rosa Pasquier Urbina, Laura Phelps, Felipe Ramiro, Lauren Ravon, Kate Raworth, Adriana Rodriguez, Jo Rowlands, Hugo Sintes, Ines Smyth, Caroline Sweetman, Jo Villanueva, Martin Walsh, and Phillipa Young. For reports also thanks to: Norul Amin, Ala„a Eid, Sonali Gunasekera, Maite Matheu, Gunel Mehdiyeva, Celeste Molina, Zahria Mapandi, Shija Msikula, Jing Pura and Shanmugaratnam Senthuran. Page 24 Photo credits: Oxfam.
  • 25.
    FOR A POWERPOINTVERSION OF THIS PRESENTATION PLEASE EMAIL THALIA KIDDER: TKIDDER@OXFAM.ORG.UK