Gaza War Research Paper

Gaza War Research Paper
During the winter of 2008, Gaza came under an extensive aerial bombing campaign from the Israeli Defense Forces. This signaled the beginning of
the Gaza War, also known as Operation Cast Lead by the Israelis, the Gaza Massacre by the Palestinians, or simply the 2008 Gaza War as it became
widely known. The three–week conflict began on December 27th, 2008 and ended on January 18th, 2009. I lived that war and witnessed the insanity
of it. I am always reminded of the faces of those innocent children being pulled out from underneath the wreckage of obliterated homes. Gaza, the
place I called home for most of my life, is a small strip of Palestinian land, about three times the size of Miami. It is located along the Mediterranean
Sea and the epicenter...show more content...
That morning my husband got a call from the American Embassy in Jerusalem ordering evacuation of American citizens. They told him that he could
bring me with him. They told him that we had to evacuate quickly as we had little time. We gathered what we can and headed toward the border with
Egypt. Then we were transported to Cairo where we stayed for 10 days before we flew to Miami. We could not believe that we made alive through
this three–week of bloodshed when thousands of innocent people had perished. I have lived to tell the story of my experience and to speak of that
menacing war. Not a single day passes without being reminded of the horrific atrocities that I had witnessed during those three
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

The conflict between Israel and Palestine has tight roots in history, stretching thousands of years back to when the Israelites first forged their way into
the land, then known as Canaan. It came to its peak in 1948, the year Israel declared its independence (Beinin). Ever since then, the volatile area of
Palestine has become a battle ground for war, terrorism, and politics. The two nations have attempted to make agreements, but so far, none of them
have succeeded in creating long–lasting peace. Since it is unlikely that neither Israel nor Palestine would completely give up their land to the other
nation, a compromise needs to be forged between the two. The conflict between Israel and Palestine cannot stop unless Israel lifts the...show more
content...
These restrictions have not completely closed off trade into Gaza, however. With heavy border control on the surface, traders have turned to smuggling
goods through subterranean tunnels that burrow into Egypt. It is estimated that around 15,000 jobs are found in the tunnels, smuggling anything from
weapons and cement, to food and cigarettes. These jobs are very much high–risk, however, with cave–ins increasingly common. (Myre) If Israel
dropped their blockade and opened up more trading opportunities for the people of Gaza, there would be a significant decrease in accidents in these
smuggling tunnels, and their economy would be better off. Above all else, it would express to the Palestinians of Gaza that Israel was prepared to trust
them. The second step in ending this violent conflict in the Middle East is for Israel to lift their occupation and settlement on the Gaza Strip and the
West Bank. If Palestinians and Israelis had settled for the terms outlined in the original United Nations partition plan in 1947, history might have taken
a very different path. This plan would have split the land into two different states, an Arab state, and an Israeli state. Jerusalem and Bethlehem, for their
religious significance to many cultures, would have become international regions. (Beinin) Due to the likelihood of further Jewish immigration, this

How Did Arab And Israel Fight Over Gaza
Arab and Israel have been fighting over Gaza for decades. After the holocaust where six million Jews were killed, many Jewish people wanted their
own country. So they were given a large part of Palestine, which they though of their home but the Arabs in near by countries thought this was unfair
and didn't accept the new country. Because of this the two sides went to war and in the end Gaza was controlled by Egypt. It contained thousands of
Palestinians who fled the new Jewish home, Israel.

My Identity In The Gaza Strip
I am an American Jew born 12 years after the end of WWII. Hebrew school, which I started attending at age 5 until 11, created a sense of difference
and specialty between myself and other non–Jews. Arabs, Palestinians and all anti–Semites were the enemy of the Jewish world community and were
to be despised. Consequently, 75 percent of my identity was held in place by my membership to the Jewish world community. Consequently, I lived the
next twenty years as a Defensive American Zionist Jew. I didn't questionIsrael for its military actions, for occupying other's lands, bulldozing houses
or refugee camps down, or committing other horrible acts. After all, Israel was only defending itself from terrorist factions that called for the
genocide of the Jewish people and whose intent was and still is to wipe Israel off the map....show more content...
Consequently, after hours of searches and reading articles published from each side on the middle east conflict and its issues two things became
undeniable clear to me, one, the Gaza Strip is an occupied territory and two, there really are terrorists in the Gaza Strip who want to exterminate the
Jewish population. Nonetheless, Israel, perhaps rightly so given its long history of being attacked and the continued philippic speeches by

The Pros And Cons Of Gaza Tunnels
Tunnel's Palestinian fighters scary for Israel Gaza–SP– Chairman of the security and foreign sector of Israeli Parliament, Avie Dekhtar said that Israel
make every effort to destroy tunnels Palestinians. Dekhtar added that currently the biggest project of Hamas is building underground tunnels
throughout the Gaza Strip. These tunnels are used to supply weapons for Hamas fighters. And today, about a thousand Palestinian youths go to Gaza
tunnel to see the real conditions in the tunnel because they believe that someday there will be a war against Israel and the tunnels were used to supply
weapons for Gaza militants who fought in the Gaza–Israel border. One of the Israeli military observer said that the Israeli army has set up a special force

The Conflicts Of Conflict In A Letter From Gaza
Can you imagine yourself reading a story without a conflict? A conflict is an essential part of plot; it is a struggle or problem that faces the character
in a story. Stories seem to plot less, if we take the conflict out of plot. Every story revolves around the opposition of the antagonist and protagonist.
Therefore, stories are interesting and have meaning. Stories usually have more than one kind of conflict in it. This conflict can be a struggle between a
man and nature, a struggle between man and another man and a struggle between man and his society. These struggles are external. Conflicts can also
be internal, as the struggle between different ideas and elements within a man. In this essay we will discuss the different types of conflict...show more
content...
However, I enjoyed the conflicts in the story "a letter from Gaza". This story is holding a deep meaning in it , and it teaches us several things: for one
thing, loyalty for your country, land and people is more important than anything else. It is our duty to protect our country from occupation, stay and
fight until your country becomes independent. For another thing, I most important moral lesson in this story is the act of bravery the thirteen– year
–old girl did. She could have saved herself and rescued her leg but her nobility drove her to sacrifice herself in order to protect her little brothers and
sisters from the bombs and flames that destroyed their

The Conflict Of The West Bank And Gaza Strip
One State, Two States Few, if any, modern conflicts are as complex as the Arab
–Israeli conflict. Specifically, the political situation in the West Bank
and Gaza Strip has led to bloodshed, political high wire acts, and cycles of hope and disappointment for decades. Consensus has generally leaned
towards advocated a two–state solution for the conflict, in which the Israel remains a Jewish state, and the Palestinian Arabs establish their own country
carved from currently Israeli–occupied territories. This solution has become more infeasible, not more attainable, efforts to find a lasting peace have
occurred. The main alternative, a one–state solution, in which one nation takes full control of the Israel, the West Bank, and the Gaza Strip,...show more
content...
While UN Security Council Resolution 242 called for Israel to remove itself from these areas and return to its pre–1967 War borders (Farsakh 2005),
Israel continued its presence in the region. In the years that have followed, numerous solutions have been proposed to solve the crisis and to bring a
lasting peace and sense of stability to the area. The solution most supported up to now has been the two–state solution. In this solution, parts of the
West Bank and the Gaza Strip (likely the full area in the latter) would become part of an independent, self–governing Palestinian state, while the rest of
the area would become Israeli territory. With this, Palestinians would have a nation–state and could chart their own political and cultural course. Most
nations and international organizations have lent their support to this idea, including the US, the UN, and Israel and Palestinian Authority (Sanger
2016), forming the basis for most peace talks aiming to resolve the conflict. The question that now remains is why has this solution not yet been
achieved? The disagreement on the borders of each state remains one of the primary roadblocks to achieving the two–state solution. There exists no
consensus on which land would belong to Israel and which to an independent Palestinian state. One complicating issue in

Essay on The Six Day War
Outline
A.Jan–March 1967: 270 border incidents
B.May 13 1967: Sadat arrives from Moscow with misinformation about impending Israeli attack.
C.May 14, 1967: Israel learns that Egypt is reinforcing troops and are on alert and reinforcing on Sinai Peninsula.
D.May 16: Egypt Evicts UN Forces
E.May 22, 1967: Egypt closes the Straits of Tiran to Israel, cutting off their supply route to Asia and supply of oil. By international law this is an act of
war.
F.May 30, 1967: Jordan signs defense treaty with Egypt after Israel had repeatedly asked they remain neutral
G.June 3, 1967: Military Buildup
H.June 5, 1967 : Six Day War Begins
The Six Day War as it became known was the third conflict between Israel and Arab nations. It was...show more content...
On May 15, Anwar Sadat, the Speaker of the National Assembly would visit Moscow, where he would be told by the Soviets that Israel had
planned to invade Syria during the May 16 through May 22 time frame, all of this would prove to be false. Soviet intelligence cited the fact that
Israeli troops parading in western Jerusalem, for Israel's Independence Day, were doing so without heavy weapons, which they said were being
amassed along the northern border with Syria. The reason as it turns out they were devoid of weaponry during their parades is to ease Arab
tensions in the area. Sadat would pass this information along to Egypt and President Nasser, who would then parade Egypt's forces through Cairo
along its way to the Sinai Peninsula (Cleveland, 2009). On May 14, evidence that disputed Soviet information of an Israeli troop buildup along its
Northern border with Syria would be ignored. Gen. Muhammed Fawzi, would tour the area reportedly rife with Israeli troops, only to find none,
These findings would be confirmed by the head of Egyptian intelligence, the CIA and U.S. embassy in Cairo, but would be ignored by Nasser and
his buildup of troops would continue (www.sixdaywar.org,2010). Israel would put its troops on alert, but sent its diplomats in to service, trying to
avert war, or at least showing that they were not interested in a war. But to no avail as Egyptian and Palestinian forces would triple

The War of 1948 Essay examples
The War of 1948, also known as the War of Independence, was fought between Israel and its Arab neighbors. The war began May 15, 1948 when
units from the armies of Egypt, Syria, Lebanon, Jordan, and Iraq invaded Israel launching a war that lasted until December 1948.# The war resulted in
the defeat of the Arab forces and the success of Israel as a newly established state. It is evident that the Arab forces were not successful in the first
Arab–Israeli war because the Arab army lacked motivation, education, and proper equipment.# Despite the support from Arab states outside of
Palestine, the Arabs were unable to gain enough strength to overcome the Israeli forces. In contrast, the Israeli army was able to succeed because they
had...show more content...
The Haganah, the Israeli Defense Forces, had more than 35,000 people in the army. More so, the men and women in the army were trained and
were mostly made up of volunteers. By December of 1948 the Israeli army numbered more than 96,000.# Although a large number of soldiers does
not account for Israel's success in the War of 1948, it does play a significant role that cannot be ignored. A majority of the Arab population in the
territory that became Israel, around 700,000 people, became refugees.# During the first stages of war, many civilians temporarily evacuated from
zones of combat with plans to return once fighting had stopped. However, during the early summer of 1948 Palestinian Arabs began fleeing in mass
numbers, leaving behind their homes, businesses, and land. The Haganah saw the Arab flight as an opportunity to advance, and began encouraging
the evacuation of towns and cities. In April 1948 the Haganah authorized a plan known as Plan D.# The campaign "provided for the conquest and
permanent occupation, or leveling, of the Arab villages and towns."# The field officers of the Haganah interpreted Plan D as giving them the power to
expunge the Palestinian Arabs living in the area of the Jewish state as well as the Arabs living inside territory given to the Arab state. Plan D not only
intensified

The First Intifada was the 1987 Palestinian revolution against Israel. It was an uprising that was sparked from decades of political and territorial
tension in the West Bank and Gaza. There were triggers immediately prior to the Intifada that sparked the heightened reaction however much focus
needs to be placed in the long term causes prior to December 1987 to explain the First Intifada.
Following the Six–Day War, Israeli settlement and presence in theWest Bank and Gaza Strip formed a constant tension and unrest between Israelis and
Palestinians. It is also important to recognise the climate of economic adversities and low quality of living conditions for the Palestinians due to Israeli
focused government policies. This essay will discuss the importance of land ownership in the West Bank and Gaza Strip as the source of mounting
frustration by Palestinians against the Israelis. It will also discuss the rekindling of Palestinian nationalism that was especially prominent throughout
the Intifada.
While specific events may have sparked the First Intifada, it was the overt and underlying tension between the Palestinians and Israelis that were the
foundation for the tension in 1987. This essay will focus specifically on the tension that was caused by Israeli land ownership in the West Bank and
Gaza Strip.
The dispute of land tenure and occupation was the most extensive and enduring cause of tensions surrounding the First Intifada. At the point of the
First Intifada there was a

Short story is like a river never stops and will keep on flowing.conflicts in the short story shows how deep the problem or the struggle facing the
character in the short story, it can be an internal conflict or external conflict.characters in short story are two types the protagonist which is the main
character and the antagonist which is the character opposes the protagonist in the short story.character in the short story can be a dynamic character
which can develops throw the story plot or it can be static which stay the same in the short story.
Different types of conflicts in the short story are man against man conflict and this is an external conflict, like the struggle between protagonist and
antagonist which is very common in the short stories.the second conflict in the short story is man...show more content...
In the short story " A letter from Gaza" by Ghassan Kanafani we have two types of conflicts.the first conflict is man against himself which explain the
narrator having a problem that he is having an opportunity to travel to a foreign country which will provide a safe community and well paid salaries,
but he refused to travel and he stayed in his country Gaza supporting his family and his country people.
The second conflict is man against society which explain how the narrator struggles the fact of his niece Nadia losing her leg because of the enemy's
bombing on innocent people.
In the short story "The Scarlet Ibis" we have all kind of conflicts.the first conflict is man against man which is between the main character who is the
older brother against his younger brother doodle which show how deep the struggle goes between a normal person and a sick person facing life
challenges in a daily

In 2005, the Israeli government decided to give up the Gaza Strip, including Gush Katif, in an effort to bring peace to the middle east. They did not
take into consideration much of the consequences of their actions. The attempt to create peace by giving Gush Katif to the Palestinians not only did
not have that effect, but the exact opposite effect, creating more violence between the Israelis and the Palestinians, as well as a lack of trust between
the government and some of the Israeli people. Gush Katif is a village in the Middle East that is a part of the Gaza Strip. In 2005, it was given to the
Palestinians by the Israeli government. Gush Katif was home to 1,800 religious Jewish families, 8,500 people, from both traditional and...show more
content...
Due to its close proximity to Palestinian land, Gush Katif was a constant location for terrorist attacks. The first main attack was by the Gaza
palestinians in December of 1987. The residents of Gush Katif did not know how to handle the conflict. Prime Minister Yitzchak Rabin said that they
will help Gush Katif and prove to the palestinians that they will not win through violence, no matter how long it takes. Another famous bombing in
Gush Katif was the November 20th 2000 school bus bombing. At 7:30am, a bomb blew up a school bus carrying children to school. Two children
were killed and nine were critically injured. Three siblings had to get amputations. There were also constant attacks to vehicles on Kissufim road,
most of which were suicide bombings on children's busses. Lots of people got hurt. Despite all the terrorism, the residents of Gush Katif were not
afraid of living there. They claimed that this land was given to them in the Torah and that all ofIsrael had their problems so they would not feel safer in
the center of Tel–Aviv. In 2004, Prime Minister Ariel Sharon announced The Disengagement Plan. This plan stated that the residents of Gush Katif and
other villages throughout Gaza would be expelled from their homes and their land would be given to the palestinians. The government hoped that this
would reduce fighting between the

Essay on War
Essay on war
War has been a part of human culture since it's birth. It has led to a great many massacres and has shown us the evil that exists within the souls of
humanity. Some have even gone as far as saying that war is human nature. To better understand the reasons behind war and how it affects others, I've
examined several different societies and cultures so as to better understand the necessity of war and see the cause of their external war attitude. To do
so, different variables from two topics (military institutions and external war attitude) were matched up and crossed so as to look into the answers to
these questions. The variables were then calculated and through these graphs, I was able to find different societies in which...show more content...
Warfare to the Somalis was seen as a division of labor that was the principal means of acquiring cattle. In times of war, peasants would be taken
from /their/his/ home/s/ for months at a time. Warfare was organized by the chiefs on behalf of the kin and it was the duty of every able bodied man
to take part in it (pg 133 Philip)." In order for one to become wealthy within a society, they must earn it through the privilege of authority. This comes
from the reward of conduct pleasing to one's superiors. For the most part, the wealth of a man comes from the exercise of poetical virtues, obedience to
authority, wisdom in council, and courage in war.
During battle, leadership among the Somalis is led by a general who the king feels will be the right one only after having a consultation with the
appropriate spirits. He also selected the people of certain sazas "to guard the king." These people did so simply by staying home. The leaders of the
armies were forceful during wartime. "Every able bodied man was expected to turn out, but though the penalty for cowardice in the field was instant
death by burning, people who simply stayed at home were merely fined on their chief's return (P. 193 Philips)."
The generals were important as a moral rallying–point. It is said that the army would lose heart if their general is killed in battle , but as soon as his
successor is found, their courage would return. The decision to engage in war was made mainly by the king and his orders

Essay Death in Gaza
With Israel receiving three billion dollars in aid annually from the United States of America, the Israeli–Palestinian conflict is an issue that is relevant
to life in the U.S. However, to many it is no more than a distant battle fought in a land few will ever see. The documentary film Death in Gaza attempts
to humanize the conflict through the everyday lives and voices of young children living in the war–stricken area. While the documentary is relatively
one–sided, showing only the Palestinian viewpoint, it does serve the purpose of shedding light and interest on an issue that is unimaginable to those not
living in the region, yet is fought and survived by people no different than ourselves. The documentary begins by showing the...show more content...
These are children who have seen so many friends and relatives lose their lives in the battle for an independent Palestine that death is an everyday
aspect of life. Funerals are as common to these children as mealtimes in other countries. The streets are lined with pictures of the deceased, or
martyrs as the Palestinians call them. In fact, these deaths are no longer mourned, but rather celebrated as furthering of the cause, so much so that
children look forward to martyrdom. Many have already written letters to their families in case they are killed, including a boy, Abdul Sattar, who is
only eleven years old. Others quickly join Palestinian insurgent groups and militias, acting as lookouts and assembling hand grenades when they are
not throwing stones at Israeli tanks and bulldozers. Despite the vivid and brutal scenes of Gaza the film captures, the documentary delves into a much
deeper issue, the mentality of these children. It is surprising to see that these children can speak with an innocence so characteristic of childhood
about things such as friends and school, but in only seconds can exude developed, adult hatred and abhorrence towards Israelis. One of the boys, only
twelve years old, tells the interviewer that he hates fighting and wants to be friends with everyone, the way he is with his best friend, except with the
Jews. This mentality is blatantly obvious in a young girl named Ayyah, who is no more than

Little did Israel know that the Six Day War would turn into a fifty year occupation of Gaza and the West Bank? During this occupation the Israeli
Government placed settlement and settlers in the disputed territory for the purpose of keeping a buffer between Israel and the Palestinians as well as
using the settlements and settlers as a means to keeping Gaza and the West Bank. During 2005 the Israeli government began removing settlers and
turning the land back over to the Palestinian's with the thought that holding on to it had become too big of a problem and it had become to taxing to
the Israeli government (Monitor, 2015).
With the peace process stalled Israel would best serve its National interests by leaving the settlers and settlements in Gaza and the West Bank. Without a
Palestinian peace deal the financial cost and man hours and loss of strategic lands would leave them more vulnerable to Palestinian attack.
By staying they can keep the status quo and to a degree keep the Palestinian's in...show more content...
Without a Palestinian peace deal the financial cost and man hours and loss of strategic lands would leave them more vulnerable to Palestinian
attack. The Israeli's began moving out of settlements in Gaza and West Bank but abruptly reversed course in 2000 after violence broke out again.
Many road blocks have arisen which have made it more difficult for the Israeli's to believe that the two parties will ever come to a peace agreement.
60% percent of Israeli's believe that Israel should relinquish the West Bank and Gaza. Even though that number is high many Israeli's believe that
Israel would be relinquishing land that were promised to their people in the Bible. With all things considered Israel could best serve its interest by
remaining in the disputed lands until an expectable peace plan is completed. There are no guarantees for peace without it (Monitor,

Summary Of A Child's View From Gaza
Critical Analysis Description The item that I chose for my critical analysis is a drawing from "A Child's View from Gaza: Palestinian Children's
Art and The Fight against Censorship". The book is a collection of drawings created by Gazan children that was supposed to be showcased at the
Museum of Children's Art in Oakland, California until it was censored. The artwork was created by children who were living in Gaza during
Operation Cast Lead, which lasted from December 2008 to January 2009. It was a 3 week armed conflict between Hamas and Israel which ended
with a ceasefire. Israel claims that it wanted to stop illegal weapon smuggling into Gaza and stop militants from sending more rocket fire into Israel.
The conflict raged for 3 weeks,...show more content...
The art was a part of the therapy that the children receive for their PTSD, which has developed as a result of the conflict. It highlights how the
proximity of the children to the conflict has impacted their lives. These children have witnessed violence and suffering throughout their whole
childhood, and have had their innocence seized from them. The children are not responsible for the attacks that are executed by Hamas or other
militants, but they have to deal with the repercussions of it. Innocent children who have hopes and dreams of a better future were watching their
world fall apart during this war. It leads them to think that the future is bleak, grim and unsafe. The image of the tanks chasing after the women
and children points out the grim reality of what children faced during Operation Cast Lead. They saw the soldiers entering their homes and
causing mass destruction, leading to them feeling unsafe. These children have fear, deeply embedded into their souls, and are afraid of living in
their own homes. I don't think that that is very fair, because a child is supposed to feel loved and safe in their land. They shouldn't feel petrified or
have to suffer, but this is not the case for Palestinian children. Palestinian children are trapped in an endless cycle of war, trauma, suffering, and
healing. The never ending cycle is detrimental to their mental health and morale as a people, but they still hold onto a twinge of hope. So while
Palestinian children can be seen as an oppressed group, at the same time they can also be considered to be one of the strongest groups of peoples to
exist. They have dealt with negativity and suffering, and yet still prevail at the end of the

The Underground War in Gaza by Joe Sacco
In our American society, newspapers are very important they provide a lot of solid information of what is happening in national and international
level. Newspapers are usually written to expose conflicts, peace, knowledge, lost, and other cultural media. These articles can be written in different
forms such as of multiple paragraph, photos, and comics; such as the one that the New York Times newspaper releases from their journalist, Joe
Sacco the author of the comic book "The Underground War in Gaza" on July 6, 2003. In his comic he exposes the conflicts betweenIsrael and Palestine
. Sacco then illustrates the attacks that are happening in Palestinian territories, where the Israeli army attempts to maintain control with the excuse of
...show more content...
Throughout Sacco's comic he chooses to draw himself as part of the comic, in doing so he shows how his charter is the only one that has an actual
communication with the upper level of the Israeli army, demonstrating that Palestinians have no way of communication with the opposing side.
In addition to Sacco strategies, the first perspective Sacco shows in his comic book is protection. Even when protection happens in both sides of
conflict, Palestine is illustrated as a more protective community, since the invaders are located within their territories. He shows how protection is
within the Palestinian and Israeli families and pride. Sacco adds that families began to leave their houses, in page 24, he presents, "his family was
chased out by constant Israeli gunfire," in this quote Sacco draws himself also in the frame next to Mr. T. a man who is looking after his family's
security. This man has to make a life decision of leaving their "secure home," to find an actual secure place for his family. Sacco points out those guns
are in the hands of Israeli army, but also in Palestinians hands. He chooses to not make the clear connection but the constant firing happens when there
are two different parties attacking. This attack is seen as a protection for both countries lives. In the other hand Israelis are protecting their families that
live in the other side of the borders; they don't want their families to live through what is happening in Palestine for this same reason

The term intifada properly translates as shaking off and in this literal sense the first two uprisings in 1987–1993 and 2000–2003 failed to achieve the
goal of Palestinian autonomy or eventual independence. The First Intifada took place on the 8th of December 1987. This protest was against Israeli's
occupation of the West Bank, Gaza Strip and East Jerusalem. At the crowded checkpoint Israeli truck swerved and killed four The Palestinians.
Palestinians in revenge swept across the Gaza Strip, spread to the World Bank and set into motion a blaze of nationalist resistance to occupation.
Intifada began unpredictably spontaneous actions such as stone–throwing were happening, but later on Intifada became more organized. Students,
women, workers, agriculture started to grow food in gardens and at home to replace Israeli goods. Clinics were providing emergency help to people
who were in need. Palestinians always have seen themselves as occupied, that what made them economically depend on Israel. Palestinian's work,
wages were half of what Israeli workers would get paid, their taxes were high and another thing was that they didn't have any kind of job security,
because Israeli security denied them any rights within Israel. In this case, position of Palestine is understandable, they are like any other people
wanted to be free from being heavily dependent on the Israeli's rules and resist the force that has been used against them.
Another thing that made Palestine angry was that

The Israeli and Palestinian Gaza Conflict Essay
Broad international consensus regarding the political and legal controversies of the Israeli and Palestinian Gaza conflict has been minimal at best. At
its worst it has fueled the controversies created by the United Nations Fact Finding Mission, through which, both sides maintain their positions and
justification for their actions. In ordered to obtain an opinion on this issue one must examine the factual historical background of the Gaza Conflict. By
identifying the major legal and political discrepancies, observing the perspectives of those who defend Israeli actions, and those who have a strong
critique against those actions we can grasp the complexity of this issue and make an assessment of actions on both sides. In 2005 Israel...show more
content...
International outcry caused the creation of the United Nations Fact Finding Mission on the Gaza Conflict. This conflict has brought about legal and
political controversies pertaining to the use of force, obligations of Palestinian and Israeli forces to use precaution pertaining to civilian population
and infrastructure, illegality of the blockade, and human rights abuses by Israeli defense forces which still elude full resolution and clarity. Based on
the United Nations Fact Finding Missions on the Gaza Conflict (aka the Goldstone Report) defenders of Israeli actions such as Golda Begin would
start by arguing that the fact finding mission came in with pre–conceived biases against Israel. Alan Dershowitz believes the fact finding mission is "far
more accusatory of Israeli actions, far less balanced in its criticism of Hamas, far less honest in its evaluation of evidence, far less responsible in
drawing its conclusions, far more biased against Israeli than Palestinian witnesses, and far more willing to draw adverse inferences of intentionally from
Israeli conduct and statements than from comparable Palestinian conduct and statements." (Dershowitz, pg.1) A common theme in the report is the
accusation that Israel instituted military policies which led to the intentional death of Palestinian civilians. Dershowitz believes that this is the reason
the Goldstone Report chose to ignore

Gaza War Research Paper

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Featured

Featured (20)

Gaza War Research Paper