Presentation given by Ollie Lovell at ResearchED Melbourne in 2017. This presentation focusses on applications of Cognitive Science for Learning in the classroom, and how to implement with a whole department.
First Year as Senior Maths HoD: How evidence informed can I make it?
1. First year as Senior
Maths HoD
HOW EVIDENCE INFORMED CAN I MAKE IT?
@ollie_lovell www.ollielovell.com Education Research Reading Room (podcast on iTunes)
3. Where are we going?
@ollie_lovell www.ollielovell.com Education Research Reading Room (podcast on iTunes)
• Retrieval Practice
• Spaced Repetition
• Feedback
• Implementation
4. Before we start: Two key components of
the program
@ollie_lovell www.ollielovell.com Education Research Reading Room (podcast on iTunes)
Weekly Questions
•Given to students
(with worked
solutions) at the
start of each week.
Progress Checks
•A Weekly mini-
test.
5. Where are we going?
@ollie_lovell www.ollielovell.com Education Research Reading Room (podcast on iTunes)
• Retrieval Practice
• Spaced Repetition
• Feedback
• Implementation
6. Retrieval practice (aka: the testing effect)
“If you read a piece of text through twenty times, you will not learn it by
heart so easily as if you read it ten times while attempting to recite from
time to time and consulting the text when your memory fails” - Francis
Bacon, 1620
Key paper: Nunes, L. D., & Karpicke, J. D. (2015). Retrieval‐Based Learning: Research at the Interface between Cognitive Science and Education. Emerging Trends in the
Social and Behavioral Sciences: an Interdisciplinary, Searchable, and Linkable Resource. http://doi.org/10.1002/9781118900772
@ollie_lovell www.ollielovell.com Education Research Reading Room (podcast on iTunes)
“Retrieval-based learning is a prime example of how findings from basic cognitive science can
inform educational practice” (Nunes & Karpicke, 2015, p. 2).
7. Retrieval practice (Roediger & Karpicke, 2006)
Reference: Roediger, H. L., III, & Karpicke, J. D. (2006). Test-enhanced learning: Taking memory tests improves long-term retention. Psychological Science, 17(3),
249–255. (as presented in Nunes & Karpicke, 2015, p. 6)
@ollie_lovell www.ollielovell.com Education Research Reading Room (podcast on iTunes)
SSSS SSST STTT
8. Retrieval practice at SC
@ollie_lovell www.ollielovell.com Education Research Reading Room (podcast on iTunes)
=Progress Checks
What we’re listening for
• Weekly
• Short
• Impact?
9. Y12 Specialist Mathematics
Teacher G
Y12 Mathematics Methods
Teacher K
Y11 Mathematics Further
Teacher P
Y11 Mathematics Methods, Y11
Physics. Teachers R and Ollie
@ollie_lovell www.ollielovell.com Education Research Reading Room (podcast on iTunes)
Videos removed
10. Where are we going?
@ollie_lovell www.ollielovell.com Education Research Reading Room (podcast on iTunes)
• Retrieval Practice
• Spaced Repetition
• Feedback
• Implementation
11. Spaced Repetition (aka: Distributed Practice)
@ollie_lovell www.ollielovell.com Education Research Reading Room (podcast on iTunes)
12. performance on the four-week test
was virtually doubled when
students distributed 10 practice
problems across two sessions
instead of massing the same 10
problems in one session.
Question e.g.,
‘How many
combinations of
the letters abccc
exist? ‘
@ollie_lovell www.ollielovell.com Education Research Reading Room (podcast on iTunes)
Reference: Rohrer, D., & Taylor, K. (2006). The effects of overlearning and distributed practice on the retention of mathematics knowledge. Applied Cognitive
Psychology, 20, 1209–1224.
“In Experiment 1…performance on the four-week test was
virtually doubled when students distributed 10 practice
problems across two sessions instead of massing the same 10
problems in one session.
In Experiment 2, students solved 3 or 9 practice problems in a
single session, but this manipulation had no effect on either
the one-week or four-week test.
The results of both experiments suggest that the
organization of practice problems in most mathematics
textbooks is one that minimizes long-term retention.”
(Rohrer & Taylor, 2006, p. 1)
‘Massers’
‘Spacers’
‘Spacers’
‘Massers’
13. Spaced Repetition at SC
@ollie_lovell www.ollielovell.com Education Research Reading Room (podcast on iTunes)
=Progress Checks
What we’re listening for
• Content is drawn from the previous 3
weeks
• Impact?
14. Y12 Maths Further
Teacher P
Y12 Mathematics Further
Ollie
Y11 Mathematics Methods, Y11
Physics. Teachers R and Ollie
@ollie_lovell www.ollielovell.com Education Research Reading Room (podcast on iTunes)
Y11 Gen, Methods, Spec
Teachers J, R, G
Videos removed
15. Where are we going?
@ollie_lovell www.ollielovell.com Education Research Reading Room (podcast on iTunes)
• Retrieval Practice
• Spaced Repetition
• Feedback
• Implementation
16. Before we start: Two key components of
the program (a reminder)
@ollie_lovell www.ollielovell.com Education Research Reading Room (podcast on iTunes)
Weekly Questions
•Given to students
(with worked
solutions) at the
start of each week.
Progress Checks
•A Weekly mini-
test.
17. Feedback
@ollie_lovell www.ollielovell.com Education Research Reading Room (podcast on iTunes)
Where am I
going?
• Weekly
Questions
How am I going?
• Progress
Check with
Immediate
Feedback
Where to next?
• Progress
Check
Reflection
Key paper: Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The Power of Feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. http://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487
Also see: Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership. (2017). Reframing feedback to improve teaching and learning. Retrieved
from https://www.aitsl.edu.au/docs/default-source/feedback/documents/aitsl-feedback-spotlight.pdf?sfvrsn=8
20. Feedback
@ollie_lovell www.ollielovell.com Education Research Reading Room (podcast on iTunes)
Where am I
going?
• Weekly
Questions
How am I going?
• Progress
Check with
Immediate
Feedback
Where to next?
• Progress
Check
Reflection
Reference: Butler, A. C., Marsh, E. J., Slavinsky, J. P., & Baraniuk, R. G. (2014). Integrating cognitive science and technology improves learning in a STEM classroom.
Educational Psychology Review, 26(2), 331–340. p. 333
"Feedback provides learners with information that
enables them to correct errors and to improve
understanding (Hattie and Timperley 2007). Immediate
feedback is often more effective in the classroom (Kulik
and Kulik 1988)” (Butler et al., 2014)
23. @ollie_lovell www.ollielovell.com Education Research Reading Room (podcast on iTunes)
"In the standard approach, assessment is for or of
learning. In this approach, assessment is for teaching.”
(Griffin, 2014, p. 14)
24. Feedback
@ollie_lovell www.ollielovell.com Education Research Reading Room (podcast on iTunes)
Where am I
going?
• Weekly
Questions
How am I going?
• Progress
Check with
Immediate
Feedback
Where to next?
• Progress
Check
Reflection
Source: Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2010). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 92(1), 81-90.
"Tests and homework exercises can be an invaluable guide to learning, but the
exercises must be clear and relevant to learning aims. The feedback on them
should give each pupil guidance on how to improve, and each must be given
opportunity and help to work at the improvement.” (Black & Wiliam, 2010)
'the biggest effects on student learning occur when teachers become learners of their
own teaching, and when students become their own teachers.' (Hattie, 2009, p. 22)
25. @ollie_lovell www.ollielovell.com Education Research Reading Room (podcast on iTunes)
1.What was the question?
2.What concept did this
question address? Where am I
going? Prompting students to
categorise the question, better
organising it in their mental
planning
3.Which key concept did you get
incorrect? How am I going?
Students explicitly point out the
mistake made.
4.How to do it next time?
Where to next? Students provide
a pathway to a correct response.
28. Feedback at SC
@ollie_lovell www.ollielovell.com Education Research Reading Room (podcast on iTunes)
=Progress Checks + Reflection
What we’re listening for
• Feedback on PCs is immediate (Kulik & Kulik, 1998)
• Solutions are teacher modelled (Rosenshine, 2012)
• Students self-mark (Black & Wiliam, 2010)
• Clear understanding of the PC Reflection process
29. Y12 Further Mathematics
Teacher P
Y12 Specialist & Methods
Teachers G and K
@ollie_lovell www.ollielovell.com Education Research Reading Room (podcast on iTunes)
Y11 General Mathematics
Teacher J
Y11 Methods &Physics.
Teachers R and Ollie
Videos removed
31. @ollie_lovell www.ollielovell.com Education Research Reading Room (podcast on iTunes)
Key paper: Coe, R., Aloisi, C., Higgins, S., & Major, L. E. (2014). What makes great teaching? Review of the underpinning research.
32. @ollie_lovell www.ollielovell.com Education Research Reading Room (podcast on iTunes)
Key paper: Coe, R., Aloisi, C., Higgins, S., & Major, L. E. (2014). What makes great teaching? Review of the underpinning research.
For a closer look go to
http://tiny.cc/olliestudentfeedback
34. @ollie_lovell www.ollielovell.com Education Research Reading Room (podcast on iTunes)
If you have any comments on this
teacher's knowledge of the content and
how to teach it, please write them
below.
very engaging ;) // Good knowledge and understanding of content // Method of demonstrating
and then allowing us to do a question similar to the demonstrating is very good.
If you have any comments on the
quality of this teacher's instruction,
please write them below.
Continue to provide prac exams and sacs // fix question 2.6, doesn't flow very well, maybe you're
missing a so behind 'that'. // Clear and concise, elobarates when needed. Great work! :) // Ankis
cards are amazing. I love them more than myself
If you have any comments on the
atmosphere of this teacher's classroom,
or their student relations, please write
them below.
it's alright // Music? Group chat needs improvement/ more mathematical purpose. It seems as
though students are missusing the chat. // Music pls. Chat is great for memes
If you have any comments on this
teacher's classroom management,
please write them below.
Great work! Listing topics students will be covering on the board allows students to complete
tasks in an orderly manner, or get ahead in terms of completeing and revising concepts. //
Detention is scary by effective ish.
If you have any further comments or
questions in relation to this teacher,
please feel free to share them below.
Incorporate some textbook materials to further help students // great job, keep up the work. first
teacher to use anki cards. ty ollie. first teacher to use google docs. niceu~~~ most engaging
teacher i've ever met, loves his students. love ur boots kuh. // The particular way this teacher
introduces their expression of teaching is indeed engaging but rules are not as strict as they
should be. We should also consider looking back on a few more weekly questions to maximise
our potential of success for our results in the final exam. [nonsensical sentence omitted)
35. Validity of student feedback? Maybe…
but it isn’t all about validity.
@ollie_lovell www.ollielovell.com Education Research Reading Room (podcast on iTunes)
“In the end, it all comes down to the relationship between the teacher and
the student. To give effective feedback, the teacher needs to know the
student—to understand what feedback the student needs right now. And to
receive feedback in a meaningful way, the student needs to trust the
teacher—to believe that the teacher knows what he or she is talking about
and has the student's best interests at heart. Without this trust, the student is
unlikely to invest the time and effort needed to absorb and use the feedback.”
(Wiliam, 2016, as quoted at http://evidenceforlearning.org.au/news/effective-feedback-in-action/)
36. Feedback: Students Teachers
@ollie_lovell www.ollielovell.com Education Research Reading Room (podcast on iTunes)
For an article describing this process in more detail:
http://tiny.cc/olliefbarticle
To see Ollie’s feedback from students in a more interactive way see:
http://tiny.cc/olliefb2017a
37. Where are we going?
@ollie_lovell www.ollielovell.com Education Research Reading Room (podcast on iTunes)
• Retrieval Practice
• Spaced Repetition
• Feedback
• Implementation
38. Implementation
@ollie_lovell www.ollielovell.com Education Research Reading Room (podcast on iTunes)
Plan + Listen for
ideas and
language
Adopt/shape
language and
share
Listen for
impressions
Refine and
implement
Review and
propose
changes
42. What’s different between, 2016 2017?
@ollie_lovell www.ollielovell.com Education Research Reading Room (podcast on iTunes)
Teacher J:
• Recording
• Excel sheet
• Progress Test-Reflection
• Resource Folder Sharing
43. What’s different between, 2016 2017?
@ollie_lovell www.ollielovell.com Education Research Reading Room (podcast on iTunes)
Teacher K:
• Weekly progress check
• Lesson plan Deliver average 10 minutes/concept then the
students work on their exercises.
44. What’s different between, 2016 2017?
@ollie_lovell www.ollielovell.com Education Research Reading Room (podcast on iTunes)
Teacher P:
• Learning a lot how to use and incorporate latest technology in
our teaching/pedagogySharing resources and thoughts
• Working as a strong team
• Teaching students exactly, keeping the end result in mind
(exams) and working backwards to achieve it. (‘UBD’)
• (Ollie) Helping us by sparing time from his work load
• Great way to conduct student feedback surveys
This slide was added after the presentation. Thanks to Lucy for suggesting its inclusion to help attendees to distinguish between these two parts of the program.
PRESENTER NOTES
Reference: Roediger, H. L., III, & Karpicke, J. D. (2006). Test-enhanced learning: Taking memory tests improves long-term retention. Psychological Science, 17(3), 249–255. (as presented in Nunes & Karpicke, 2015, p. 6)
Explain the study then, prior to showing the results, get attendees to have a discussion with the person next to them about what they expect to see.
Images, RHS, the numbers represent a mean rating based on a 7 point likert scale from 1=not very well to 7=very well.
-180 undergrad students, 18-24 yo.
Key point. This is WITHOUT feedback!
MATERIAL TO BE STUDIED
-Comprehension passages. Each passage covered a single topic (‘‘The Sun’’ and ‘‘Sea Otters’’), and each was divided into 30 idea units for scoring purposes. The pas- sages were 256 and 275 words in length, respectively.
PHASE 1
-Subjects in the SSSS condition read the passage during four 5- min study periods; subjects in the SSSR condition studied the passage during three periods and then took one recall test; those in the SRRR condition studied the passage during one period and then took three consecutive recall tests.
-During study periods, subjects had 5 min to study the passage
-During the test periods, subjects were given a blank sheet and were asked to recall as much of the material from the passage as they could remember, without concern for exact wording or correct order. Testing periods lasted for 10 minutes.
-Subjects solved multiplication problems for 2 min between periods and for 5 min after the final period in Phase 1.
-At the end of Phase 1, subjects were given a questionnaire asking them to answer three questions using a 7-point scale. They indicated how interesting they thought the passage was (1 = very boring, 7 = very interesting), how readable they thought it was (1 = very easy to read, 7 5=very difficult to read), and how well they thought they would remember the passage in 1 week (1 = not very well, 7 = very well).
PHASE 2
-During the test period, subjects were given a test sheet with the title of the to-be- recalled passage printed at the top and were asked to write down as much of the material from the passage as they could re- member, without concern for exact wording or correct order.. Each retention test lasted 10 min.
RESULTS
-The reading scores (in Table 1) illustrate that subjects read the passage many more times in the SSSS (M = 14.2) and SSST (M 5= 10.3) conditions than in the STTT (M = 3.4) condition.
Questions for students?
-What is a progress check?
-How often are progress checks?
-How long are progress checks?
-What is the impact on your learning of being tested every week?
Videos showed that all teachers are undertaking weekly progress checks. Success!
Rohrer, D., & Taylor, K. (2006). The effects of overlearning and distributed practice on the retention of mathematics knowledge. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20, 1209–1224.
TASK
In the experiments reported here, college students learned to calculate the number of unique orderings (or permutations) of a letter. sequence with at least one repeated letter. For example, the sequence abbbcc has 60 permutations, including abbcbc, abcbcb, bbacbc, and so forth. The solution is given by a formula
SAMPLE
116 undergraduates at the University of South Florida
DESIGN
There were two between-subjects variables: Strategy (Space or Mass) and Retention Interval (1 or 4 weeks). Thus, each student was randomly assigned to one of four groups: Spacers with 1-week RI, Spacers with 4- week RI, Massers with 1-week RI, and Massers with 4-week RI.
APPENDIX: The formula
Students were taught to calculate the number of unique orderings (or permutations) of a letter sequence with at least one repeated letter (e.g., abbbcc). For n items and k unique items, the number of permutations equals n! / (n1! n2! ... nk!), where ni = number of repetitions of item i. For example, abbbcc includes six letters (n = 6) and three unique letters (k = 3), and the letters a, b, and c appear 1, 3, and 2 times, respectively (n1 = 1, n2 = 3, n2 = 2). Thus, by the formula, the number of permutations equals
6! / (1! 3! 2!)
= (6Χ5Χ4Χ3Χ2Χ1) / [(1)Χ(3Χ2Χ1)Χ(2Χ1)] = (6Χ5Χ4) / (2)
= 60.
In case anyone wants more info on the question type that students were asked to learn.
Questions for students:
-If a progress check is held in week 10, from which weeks would the questions for that PC be drawn? (Answer should be ‘Weeks 7, 8 and 9.’)
-What’s the impact on your learning of having content from a number of previous weeks included?
Outcome demonstrated that only Ollie and one other teacher are incorporating spaced repetition into progress checks. This is something to work on next term!
Quick reminder prior to diving into some slides specifically relating to these to practices.
Example of weekly questions
Zoomed out image of the word file for Week 20 Weekly quesitons.
Butler, A. C., Marsh, E. J., Slavinsky, J. P., & Baraniuk, R. G. (2014). Integrating cognitive science and technology improves learning in a STEM classroom. Educational Psychology Review, 26(2), 331–340.
Example of pg 1 of a 2 pg weekly progress check.
Image of Ollie’s markbook tracking student progress as recorded through progress checks. Entering a class of 25 takes approx. 7 mins per progress check.
Griffin, P. (2014). Assessment for teaching., p. 14
Whilst handing back progress checks to students Ollie asks ‘which questions did you get wrong?’ then records quickly on a notepad. He then ensures that these questions are repeated in following weeks.
See a blog on this here: http://tiny.cc/howchoosequiz
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2010). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 92(1), 81-90.
Hattie, Visible Learning.
This is an example of a ‘progress check of the week’ that was awarded to students.
PC Reflections are submitted by email, saves marking time as is much easier to click through emails than collect up books, find relevant page, etc.
Ollie’s markbook showing progress check reflections completed. The boxes with a more solid boarder are PC reflections for which Ollie awarded ‘PC reflection of the week’.
See more on this in this blog post: http://evidenceforlearning.org.au/news/effective-feedback-in-action/
Students were asked: How is feedback given on your PCs?
How is your work marked?
What do you have to do if you didn’t get 100% on your PC reflections?
Videos revealed that all teachers except one are following the process of getting students to self-mark.
Feedback flows not just from teachers to students, but also from students to teachers.
Example of how Coe’s paper was decomposed into questions that comprised the student feedback form.
Read more on this here: www.ollielovell.com/olliesclassroom/improving-student-feedback-form/
Data from recent feedback form, 7 point Likert scale from 1=disagree strongly to 7=agree strongly.
Again, exact questions can be seen here: www.ollielovell.com/olliesclassroom/improving-student-feedback-form/
Student comments compiled and separated with ‘//’
There’s a massive positive impact on trust between students and teachers if teachers simply ask students for their opinons.
The process that Ollie has gone through in order to try to bring about change at Sunshine SC.
Slide not shown in original slideshow. This paper is a good and concise summary of how retrieval practice, spacing, and feedback can be incorporated into an instructional program. Highly recommended.
Interesting work by Guskey, well worth checking out! Slide also not shown.
Images from staff meeting.
Teachers helping each other learn tech (Dropbox)
Note the lolly jar!
Teacher comments.
A slide that Ollie produced for teacher K to help him more clearly distinguish between the different components of his instruction, and to make it clearer for students.