OSFair2017 Workshop | Fear and loathing in Open Peer Review

•

1 like•195 views

Jon Tennant talks about barriers to Open Peer Review | OSFair2017 Workshop Workshop title: Peer review at the crossroads Workshop overview: The workshop builds on the results of the OpenUp landscape scan and the OpenAIRE report on open peer review. The workshop has multiple purposes including (1) assessing existing and evolving methods and functions of alternative peer review mechanisms, (2) breaking down peer review into the basic processes to identify the benefits and challenges, and (3) identifying questions and issues that need further investigation. Group discussions will also touch upon issues such as the sustainability, long-term availability of alternative review tools, and their uptake by researchers, and the incorporation of these methods into institutional, national, funders’ and publishers’ policies. OpenUP and OpenAIRE are dedicated to engage with different (disciplinary, inter-disciplinary) research communities from the social sciences, life sciences, energy, arts and humanities to identify the requirements from the emerging trends as posed by Open Science and e-infrastructural interconnected environments. Both projects aim at developing a sustainable framework that is relevant for and responsive to the Open Science needs. DAY 3 - PARALLEL SESSION 6

Science

FEAR AND LOATHING IN
OPEN PEER REVIEW?
JonTennant

No one really knows what it is
• Open identities
• Open reports
• Open participation
• Open interaction
• Open pre-review manuscripts
• Open final-version commenting
• Open platforms
https://f1000research.com/articles/6-588/v1
122
COMPETING
DEFINITIONS

Peer review changed your relationship status
to “It’s complicated.”
https://f1000research.com/articles/6-1151/v1

The debate
1. How can referees receive credit or recognition for their work, and what
form should this take.
2. Should referee reports be published alongside manuscripts.
3. Should referees remain anonymous or have their identities disclosed.
4. Should peer review occur prior or subsequent to the publication process
(i.e., publish then filter).

Fear governs all
• Refusal to perform peer review.
• Appearing confrontational in public.
• Abuse of power dynamics and intimidation.
• Backlash from senior researchers.
• Empowerment of bad actors.
• Marginalisation of those with less power.
• Researchers won’t be honest or critical.

Solutions I
• Built-in accountability processes.
• Transparency by default to level the playing field.
• Assholes gonna asshole, so let’s find ways to deal
with that (e.g., COPE).
• Increase quality through accountability and
identification.
• Attach CC BY license and DOIs to peer reviews –
make them citable.
• Make peer reviews valued and part of permanent
academic records.
https://f1000research.com/articles/6-1151/v1

Solutions II
• Make sure arguments and policies are evidence-
based.
• No, seriously. No evidence, no case.That includes
your anecdata.Take it elsewhere.
• Because we’re not talking about individuals here –
we’re talking about systems comprising millions of
individuals.
• So you have to remain flexible. No one-size fits all.
• Account for social and cultural norms and differences.

https://f1000research.com/articles/6-1151/v1

More from Open Science Fair

Matthew Dovey & Jessica Parland-von Essen present EOSC governance & objectives. Workshop title: Open Science policy in the context of EOSC governance framework Workshop overview: The challenge of EOSC governance is how to construct a framework allowing varied and disparate stakeholders to work together. The EOSCPilot project has established a Governance Development Forum (EGDF) so that all stakeholders can contribute to the development of a governance framework to inform the establishment of EOSC and its governance structure. In this workshop we will discuss how Open Science should manifest in the EOSC governance framework. When: DAY 2 - PARALLEL SESSION 4

OSFair2017 Workshop | EOSCpilot governance

Open Science Fair

Stefano Nativi presents the RDA. Workshop title: Organising high-quality research data management services Workshop abstract: Open science needs high quality data management where researchers can create, use and share data according to well defined standards and practices. this is one of the pillars of Open Science. In the data management landscape we find quite a few organisations that aim at achieving this, however to get it right, a collaboration is called for where all can play a suitable role and present this in a consistent way to the researcher. The proposed workshop brings together representatives of standard organisation (RDA), eInfrastructures (EUDAT) and Libraries (LIBER) that together can organise the high quality data management for research. DAY 1 - PARALLEL SESSION 2 http://opensciencefair.eu/workshops/organising-high-quality-research-data-management-services

OSFair2017 Workshop | Brokering services facilitating interoperability and da...

Open Science Fair

Daan Broeder presents the EUDAT community Workshop title: Organising high-quality research data management services Workshop abstract: Open science needs high quality data management where researchers can create, use and share data according to well defined standards and practices. this is one of the pillars of Open Science. In the data management landscape we find quite a few organisations that aim at achieving this, however to get it right, a collaboration is called for where all can play a suitable role and present this in a consistent way to the researcher. The proposed workshop brings together representatives of standard organisation (RDA), eInfrastructures (EUDAT) and Libraries (LIBER) that together can organise the high quality data management for research. DAY 1 - PARALLEL SESSION 2 http://opensciencefair.eu/workshops/organising-high-quality-research-data-management-services

OSFair2017 Workshop | Service provisioning for excellent sciences

Open Science Fair

Alexandros Koukovinis & Menelaos Sotiriou present the performance chapters. Workshop abstract: This workshop highlights the concept of a Support and Coordination H2020 action, namely NUCLEUS, which is targeted on Responsible Research and Innovation. It is aligned with the overall objective of the OSFair conference, answering to the impact of open science/novel ways of disseminating science. What NUCLEUS project introduces, is that based on a common understanding that science and innovation are driving forces of sustainable and inclusive societies around the world, it will develop new cultural and organisational approaches allowing universities to better respond and react to societal needs and challenges. To pursue this goal NUCLEUS will develop, support and implement inclusive and sustainable approaches to “Responsible Research and Innovation” (RRI) within the governance and culture of European universities and research organisations. A wide scale implementation roadmap and a future of science with and for the society will be presented in the most engaging way. Day 1 - 17.30 http://opensciencefair.eu/theatrical-workshop-are-you-ready-to-perform-in-the-rri-ecosystem

OSFair2017 Theatrical Workshop | Are you ready to perform in the rri ecosystem

Open Science Fair

Alexandros Koukovinis & Menelaos Sotiriou present the Nucleus H2020 project. Workshop abstract: This workshop highlights the concept of a Support and Coordination H2020 action, namely NUCLEUS, which is targeted on Responsible Research and Innovation. It is aligned with the overall objective of the OSFair conference, answering to the impact of open science/novel ways of disseminating science. What NUCLEUS project introduces, is that based on a common understanding that science and innovation are driving forces of sustainable and inclusive societies around the world, it will develop new cultural and organisational approaches allowing universities to better respond and react to societal needs and challenges. To pursue this goal NUCLEUS will develop, support and implement inclusive and sustainable approaches to “Responsible Research and Innovation” (RRI) within the governance and culture of European universities and research organisations. A wide scale implementation roadmap and a future of science with and for the society will be presented in the most engaging way. Day 1 - 17.30 http://opensciencefair.eu/theatrical-workshop-are-you-ready-to-perform-in-the-rri-ecosystem

OSFair2017 Theatrical Workshop | Nucleus H2020 EU project

Open Science Fair

Peter Kraker & Rainer Bachleitner make an introduction to Open Knowledge Maps Workshop abstract: This tutorial introduces participants to an innovative discovery tool that is built on top of the open science infrastructure. It showcases the value of open for all stakeholders beyond open access to research outputs. Participants will go on a scientific scavenger hunt in an unknown research field that is intended to improve their own discovery process, including ample time for feedback and discussion. DAY 3 - PARALLEL SESSION 8 http://opensciencefair.eu/training/parallel-day-3-3/visual-discovery-with-open-knowledge-maps

OSFair2017 Workshop | Open Knowledge Maps, A visual interface to the world's ...

Open Science Fair

Tom Pollard talks about reproducibility in critical care research & makes an introduction to MIMIC, the eICU Collaborative Research Database and datathons Workshop title: Datathons in Evidence-Based Medicine: Applying Open Science Principles to Support Cross-Disciplinary Education and Research Workshop abstract: In this interactive workshop, we explore how open science enables “datathons”, events that bring together teams of researchers to work together on unanswered clinical questions. We begin by outlining the datathon model and describe our experiences in holding these events internationally. We then offer an opportunity to participate in an interactice exercise, working together to analyse highly detailed information collected from patients admitted to critical care units at a large tertiary care hospital. Participants will learn about open science in clinical research and gain an overview of MIMIC-III, a freely-available critical care dataset collected from over >50,000 hospital stays. DAY 2 - PARALLEL SESSION 3 http://opensciencefair.eu/training/parallel-day-2-1/datathons-in-evidence-based-medicine-applying-open-science-principles-to-support-cross-disciplinary-education-and-research

OSFair2017 Training | Reproducibility in critical care research

Open Science Fair

Lefteris Thireos talks about big data and evidence-based medicine in Greece. Workshop title: Datathons in Evidence-Based Medicine: Applying Open Science Principles to Support Cross-Disciplinary Education and Research Workshop abstract: In this interactive workshop, we explore how open science enables “datathons”, events that bring together teams of researchers to work together on unanswered clinical questions. We begin by outlining the datathon model and describe our experiences in holding these events internationally. We then offer an opportunity to participate in an interactice exercise, working together to analyse highly detailed information collected from patients admitted to critical care units at a large tertiary care hospital. Participants will learn about open science in clinical research and gain an overview of MIMIC-III, a freely-available critical care dataset collected from over >50,000 hospital stays. DAY 2 - PARALLEL SESSION 3 http://opensciencefair.eu/training/parallel-day-2-1/datathons-in-evidence-based-medicine-applying-open-science-principles-to-support-cross-disciplinary-education-and-research

OSFair2017 Training | Big data and evidence-based medicine in Greece

Open Science Fair

Nancy Pontika talks about opening up science & implementation. Workshop title: Fostering the practical implementation of Open Science in Horizon 2020 and beyond Workshop overview: This workshop will showcase some of the elements required for the transition to Open Science: services and tools, policies as guidance for good practices, and the roles of the respective actors and their networks. DAY 2 - PARALLEL SESSION 4 & 5

OSFair2017 Training | What is Open Science and why should I care?

Open Science Fair

Pedro Principe presents OpenAIRE monitoring services. Workshop title: Fostering the practical implementation of Open Science in Horizon 2020 and beyond Workshop overview: This workshop will showcase some of the elements required for the transition to Open Science: services and tools, policies as guidance for good practices, and the roles of the respective actors and their networks. DAY 2 - PARALLEL SESSION 4 & 5

OSFair2017 Training | OpenAIRE monitoring services, EC FP7 & H2020 & other na...

Open Science Fair

Eloy Rodrigues, José Carvalho & Pedro Príncipe talk about designing & implementing Open Access, Open Data & Open Science policies. Workshop title: Fostering the practical implementation of Open Science in Horizon 2020 and beyond Workshop overview: This workshop will showcase some of the elements required for the transition to Open Science: services and tools, policies as guidance for good practices, and the roles of the respective actors and their networks. DAY 2 - PARALLEL SESSION 4 & 5

OSFair2017 Training | Designing & implementing open access, open data & open ...

Open Science Fair

Iryna Kuchma talks about best practices in Open Science. Workshop title: Fostering the practical implementation of Open Science in Horizon 2020 and beyond Workshop overview: This workshop will showcase some of the elements required for the transition to Open Science: services and tools, policies as guidance for good practices, and the roles of the respective actors and their networks. DAY 2 - PARALLEL SESSION 4 & 5

OSFair2017 Training | Best practice in Open Science

Open Science Fair

Peter Kraker, Michela Vignoli & Rainer Bachleitner give an overview of an innovative dissemination framework & present the OpenUP Innovative Dissemination Toolbox. Workshop title: Innovative dissemination practices & Altmetrics Workshop abstact: The goal of the workshop is to further the understanding of innovative dissemination practices in open science and their relationship with altmetrics. In the first part of the workshop, OpenUP project researchers will give an overview of an innovative dissemination framework. The framework describes good practices and gives recommendations on how to create a successful research dissemination strategy beyond traditional academic dissemination. A special focus will lie on how to reach target audiences beyond the research community (e.g. business or the general public). Participants will be able to test the framework and a toolbox based on their dissemination needs and to give feedback in a discussion that involves the perspective of all stakeholders of dissemination and assessment (researchers and research organizations, funders, policy makers, journalists, practitioners & businesses etc.). In the second part, we will present a taxonomy linking channels of dissemination and altmetrics indicators. In between, we will present best practice examples of innovative dissemination. DAY 2 - PARALLEL SESSION 3 http://opensciencefair.eu/workshops/parallel-day-2-1/innovative-dissemination-practices-and-altmetrics License: CC-BY, unless otherwise noted

OSFair2017 Worksop | Innovative dissemination practices & Altmetrics

Open Science Fair

Jon Tennant talks about barriers to open science for junior researchers Plenary: Open for all? Diversity & disparity in Open Science. Presentation Abstract: What are the barriers to Open Science, and how do they impact upon different demographics? Open Science is supposed to be about inclusivity, equality, and rigour. But is the way it is implemented meeting these ideals, or simply creating a new set of barriers to scholarship? Younger researchers are basically trying to survive within a hyper-competitive academic system. They are beset on all sides by systemic control and inertia, power dynamics, and fear. What they want to do for science is not always what is best for their career. This creates a system of social barriers that cannot be overcome by mandates and policies that do little to address these structural biases. Paywalls inflict a huge level of disparity on younger researchers. They may feel they cannot afford the exorbitant fees charged by some publishers for Open Access, even if their research funders provide support for it. The way OA is currently implemented has switched the barrier from the reader side to the author side, due in part to political broadsiding from commercial publishers. Unfunded or self-funded grad students, as well as those from emerging economies, are basically doomed when it comes to such high author-facing charges. More: http://opensciencefair.eu/speakers/jon-tennant DAY 2 - PLENARY

OSFair2017 | Barriers to Open Science for junior researchers

Open Science Fair

Maria Georgopoulou unfolds the role of women in exploring, understanding and archiving the past Plenary: Open for all? Diversity & disparity in Open Science. Presentation Abstract: Exploring the position of women in the American School of Classical Studies at Athens (founded in 1881) offers insights into the various roles that women have played as archaeologists, conservators, librarians and archivists in the twentieth and early twenty-first century. From the first woman to be accepted as a Member of the American School in 1885 to the installation of the first woman director of the School (Jenifer Neils) two months ago, a lot has changed. Yet, there is ample evidence to suggest that women today are still underpaid and lag behind men in the higher echelons of the academy. What can the history of women in the American School teach us about access to science? Often obscured in the shadow of their husbands, educated American women in the beginning of the 20th century had to reinvent themselves in order to find a worthy occupation that would befit their skills and aspirations. The first women archaeologists at the American School strove to gain a position worthy of the excellent training they had received in the American Women’s colleges. Stereotypes pushed them to the exploration of more “domestic” topics, minor objects like the cataloguing of small finds, as well as to administrative and organizational duties. It is instructive that the first woman ever to direct an excavation on mainland Greece, Hetty Goldman, believed that the only reason she had been allowed to excavate at Halae was to get her as far from Athens as possible; so hostile to women excavators was the tone at the American School in 1911. Twenty years later, despite the fact that women were outshining the men who took the exams to win fellowships at the American School, it was proposed to establish a fixed ratio of fellowships between men and women, one that would award many more to men. More: www.opensciencefair.eu/speakers/maria-georgopoulou DAY 2 - 09:15 PLENARY

OSFair2017 | The role of women in exploring, understanding and archiving the ...

Open Science Fair

Ahmed Oluwagbemi Ogunlaja presents the Global South perspective in Open Science Plenary: Open for all? Diversity & disparity in Open Science. Presentation abstract Some have expressed fears that Open Science may perpetuate rather than eliminate the inequalities in global research and innovation. Are these fears justified? How can we ensure diversity and combat the drivers of disparity in Open Science? How can we promote inclusion and ensure inclusive development through Open Science? "Never doubt that a small group of committed citizens can change the world; indeed, it is the only thing that ever has" - Margaret Mead. More: http://opensciencefair.eu/speakers/ahmed-ogunlaja DAY 2 - PLENARY

OSFair2017 | Open Science: A Global South Perspective

Open Science Fair

OSFair2017 Workshop overview | The roadmap to better food using ICT and open ...

Open Science Fair

Thomas Margoni presents Open Science check list for repositories and publishers Training title:TDM unlocking a goldmine of information Training overview: Text and Data Mining (TDM) is a natural ‘next step’ in open science. It can lead to new and unexpected discoveries and increase the impact of publications and repositories. This workshop showcases examples of successful TDM and infrastructural solutions for researchers. We will also discuss what is needed to make most of infrastructures and how publishers and repositories can open up their content. DAY 2 - PARALLEL SESSION 4 & 5

OSFair2017 training | Open Science check list for repositories and publishers

Open Science Fair

Petr Knoth talks about machine accessibility of Open Access scientific publications from publisher systems via ResourceSync Training title:TDM unlocking a goldmine of information Training overview: Text and Data Mining (TDM) is a natural ‘next step’ in open science. It can lead to new and unexpected discoveries and increase the impact of publications and repositories. This workshop showcases examples of successful TDM and infrastructural solutions for researchers. We will also discuss what is needed to make most of infrastructures and how publishers and repositories can open up their content. DAY 2 - PARALLEL SESSION 4 & 5

OSFair2017 training | Machine accessibility of Open Access scientific publica...

Open Science Fair

Natalia manola presents OpenAIRE analytics (using text & data mining) Training title:TDM unlocking a goldmine of information Training overview: Text and Data Mining (TDM) is a natural ‘next step’ in open science. It can lead to new and unexpected discoveries and increase the impact of publications and repositories. This workshop showcases examples of successful TDM and infrastructural solutions for researchers. We will also discuss what is needed to make most of infrastructures and how publishers and repositories can open up their content. DAY 2 - PARALLEL SESSION 4 & 5

OSFair2017 training | Explore, model, analyze and visualize systematic resear...

Open Science Fair

More from Open Science Fair (20)

OSFair2017 Workshop | EOSCpilot governance

OSFair2017 Workshop | Brokering services facilitating interoperability and da...

OSFair2017 Workshop | Service provisioning for excellent sciences

OSFair2017 Theatrical Workshop | Are you ready to perform in the rri ecosystem

OSFair2017 Theatrical Workshop | Nucleus H2020 EU project

OSFair2017 Workshop | Open Knowledge Maps, A visual interface to the world's ...

OSFair2017 Training | Reproducibility in critical care research

OSFair2017 Training | Big data and evidence-based medicine in Greece

OSFair2017 Training | What is Open Science and why should I care?

OSFair2017 Training | OpenAIRE monitoring services, EC FP7 & H2020 & other na...

OSFair2017 Training | Designing & implementing open access, open data & open ...

OSFair2017 Training | Best practice in Open Science

OSFair2017 Worksop | Innovative dissemination practices & Altmetrics

OSFair2017 | Barriers to Open Science for junior researchers

OSFair2017 | The role of women in exploring, understanding and archiving the ...

OSFair2017 | Open Science: A Global South Perspective

OSFair2017 Workshop overview | The roadmap to better food using ICT and open ...

OSFair2017 training | Open Science check list for repositories and publishers

OSFair2017 training | Machine accessibility of Open Access scientific publica...

OSFair2017 training | Explore, model, analyze and visualize systematic resear...

Recently uploaded

GBSN - Biochemistry (Unit 1)

Areesha Ahmad

Context. WASP-76 b has been a recurrent subject of study since the detection of a signature in high-resolution transit spectroscopy data indicating an asymmetry between the two limbs of the planet. The existence of this asymmetric signature has been confirmed by multiple studies, but its physical origin is still under debate. In addition, it contrasts with the absence of asymmetry reported in the infrared (IR) phase curve. Aims. We provide a more comprehensive dataset of WASP-76 b with the goal of drawing a complete view of the physical processes at work in this atmosphere. In particular, we attempt to reconcile visible high-resolution transit spectroscopy data and IR broadband phase curves. Methods. We gathered 3 phase curves, 20 occultations, and 6 transits for WASP-76 b in the visible with the CHEOPS space telescope. We also report the analysis of three unpublished sectors observed by the TESS space telescope (also in the visible), which represents 34 phase curves. Results. WASP-76 b displays an occultation of 260±11 and 152±10 ppm in TESS and CHEOPS bandpasses respectively. Depending on the composition assumed for the atmosphere and the data reduction used for the IR data, we derived geometric albedo estimates that range from 0.05 ± 0.023 to 0.146 ± 0.013 and from <0.13 to 0.189 ± 0.017 in the CHEOPS and TESS bandpasses, respectively. As expected from the IR phase curves, a low-order model of the phase curves does not yield any detectable asymmetry in the visible either. However, an empirical model allowing for sharper phase curve variations offers a hint of a flux excess before the occultation, with an amplitude of ∼40 ppm, an orbital offset of ∼−30◦ , and a width of ∼20◦ . We also constrained the orbital eccentricity of WASP-76 b to a value lower than 0.0067, with a 99.7% confidence level. This result contradicts earlier proposed scenarios aimed at explaining the asymmetry observed in high-resolution transit spectroscopy. Conclusions. In light of these findings, we hypothesise that WASP-76 b could have night-side clouds that extend predominantly towards its eastern limb. At this limb, the clouds would be associated with spherical droplets or spherically shaped aerosols of an unknown species, which would be responsible for a glory effect in the visible phase curves.

Asymmetry in the atmosphere of the ultra-hot Jupiter WASP-76 b

Sérgio Sacani

Use of mutants in understanding seedling development.pptx

RenuJangid3

Dr. E. Muralinath_ Blood indices_clinical aspects

muralinath2

www.whatsapp.com+917728919243 HOT & SEXY MODELS // COLLEGE GIRLS AVAILABLE FOR COMPLETE ENJOYMENT WITH HIGH PROFILE INDIAN MODEL AVAILABLE HOTEL & HOME ★ SAFE AND SECURE HIGH CLASS SERVICE AFFORDABLE RATE SATISFACTION,UNLIMITED ENJOYMENT. ★ All Meetings are confidential and no information is provided to any one at any cost. ★ EXCLUSIVE PROFILes Are Safe and Consensual with Most Limits Respected ★ Service Available In: - HOME *Star Hotel Service .In Call & Out call SeRvIcEs : ★ A-Level ★ Strip-tease ★ BBBJ (Bareback Blowjob)Receive advanced sexual techniques in different mode make their life more pleasurable. ★ Spending time in hotel rooms ★ BJ (Blowjob Without a Condom) ★ Completion (Oral to completion) ★ Covered (Covered blowjob Without a Condom)

Call Girls Ahmedabad +917728919243 call me Independent Escort Service

shivanisharma5244

module for grade 9 for distance learning

levieagacer

Module for Grade 9 for Asynchronous/Distance learning

levieagacer

Introduction of DNA analysis in Forensic's .pptx

rohankumarsinghrore1

fruit fly, this slide mainly made for pumpkin fruit fly, this is also known as drosophila melangastor, this type of fruit fly destroyed the mainly vegetables crops. if you want to known examples this types of fly which is destroy the pumpkin, tomato, brinjal, potato, bottle guard, ridge guard, bitter guard, cucumber, water melon, musk melon, bean, long bean and other many vegetables which has fruits. they distryed fruit fly. thank you...

pumpkin fruit fly, water melon fruit fly, cucumber fruit fly

PRADYUMMAURYA1

Human & Veterinary Respiratory Physilogy_DR.E.Muralinath_Associate Professor....

muralinath2

Velocity and Acceleration PowerPoint.ppt

RakeshMohan42

Theoretical predictions and observational data indicate a class of sub-Neptune exoplanets may have water-rich interiors covered by hydrogen-dominated atmospheres. Provided suitable climate conditions, such planets could host surface liquid oceans. Motivated by recent JWST observations of K2-18 b, we self-consistently model the photochemistry and potential detectability of biogenic sulfur gases in the atmospheres of temperate sub-Neptune waterworlds for the first time. On Earth today, organic sulfur compounds produced by marine biota are rapidly destroyed by photochemical processes before they can accumulate to significant levels. Domagal-Goldman et al. suggest that detectable biogenic sulfur signatures could emerge in Archean-like atmospheres with higher biological production or low UV flux. In this study, we explore biogenic sulfur across a wide range of biological fluxes and stellar UV environments. Critically, the main photochemical sinks are absent on the nightside of tidally locked planets. To address this, we further perform experiments with a 3D general circulation model and a 2D photochemical model (VULCAN 2D) to simulate the global distribution of biogenic gases to investigate their terminator concentrations as seen via transmission spectroscopy. Our models indicate that biogenic sulfur gases can rise to potentially detectable levels on hydrogen-rich water worlds, but only for enhanced global biosulfur flux (20 times modern Earth’s flux). We find that it is challenging to identify DMS at 3.4 μm where it strongly overlaps with CH4, whereas it is more plausible to detect DMS and companion byproducts, ethylene (C2H4) and ethane (C2H6), in the mid-infrared between 9 and 13 μm. Unified Astronomy Thesaurus concepts: Exoplanet atmospheres (487); Exoplanet

Biogenic Sulfur Gases as Biosignatures on Temperate Sub-Neptune Waterworlds

Sérgio Sacani

FAIRSpectra - Enabling the FAIRification of Analytical Science

Alex Henderson

GBSN - Microbiology (Unit 1)

Areesha Ahmad

Ultrasound color Doppler imaging has been routinely used for the diagnosis of cardiovascular diseases, enabling real-time flow visualization through the Doppler effect. Yet, its inability to provide true flow velocity vectors due to its one-dimensional detection limits its efficacy. To overcome this limitation, various VFI schemes, including multi-angle beams, speckle tracking, and transverse oscillation, have been explored, with some already available commercially. However, many of these methods still rely on autocorrelation, which poses inherent issues such as underestimation, aliasing, and the need for large ensemble sizes. Conversely, speckle-tracking-based VFI enables lateral velocity estimation but suffers from significantly lower accuracy compared to axial velocity measurements. To address these challenges, we have presented a speckle-tracking-based VFI approach utilizing multi-angle ultrafast plane wave imaging. Our approach involves estimating axial velocity components projected onto individual steered plane waves, which are then combined to derive the velocity vector. Additionally, we've introduced a VFI visualization technique with high spatial and temporal resolutions capable of tracking flow particle trajectories. Simulation and flow phantom experiments demonstrate that the proposed VFI method outperforms both speckle-tracking-based VFI and autocorrelation VFI counterparts by at least a factor of three. Furthermore, in vivo measurements on carotid arteries using the Prodigy ultrasound scanner demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach compared to existing methods, providing a more robust imaging tool for hemodynamic studies. Learning objectives: - Understand fundamental limitations of color Doppler imaging. - Understand principles behind advanced vector flow imaging techniques. - Familiarize with the ultrasound speckle tracking technique and its implications in flow imaging. - Explore experiments conducted using multi-angle plane wave ultrafast imaging, specifically utilizing the pulse-sequence mode on a 128-channel ultrasound research platform.

(May 9, 2024) Enhanced Ultrafast Vector Flow Imaging (VFI) Using Multi-Angle ...

Scintica Instrumentation

Pulmonary drug delivery system M.pharm -2nd sem P'ceutics

sakshisoni2385

Factory Acceptance Test( FAT).pptx .

Poonam Aher Patil

Locating and isolating a gene, FISH, GISH, Chromosome walking and jumping, te...

Silpa

Porella : features, morphology, anatomy, reproduction etc.

Silpa

Chemistry 5th semester paper 1st Notes.pdf

Sumit Kumar yadav

Recently uploaded (20)

GBSN - Biochemistry (Unit 1)

Asymmetry in the atmosphere of the ultra-hot Jupiter WASP-76 b

Use of mutants in understanding seedling development.pptx

Dr. E. Muralinath_ Blood indices_clinical aspects

Call Girls Ahmedabad +917728919243 call me Independent Escort Service

module for grade 9 for distance learning

Module for Grade 9 for Asynchronous/Distance learning

Introduction of DNA analysis in Forensic's .pptx

pumpkin fruit fly, water melon fruit fly, cucumber fruit fly

Human & Veterinary Respiratory Physilogy_DR.E.Muralinath_Associate Professor....

Velocity and Acceleration PowerPoint.ppt

Biogenic Sulfur Gases as Biosignatures on Temperate Sub-Neptune Waterworlds

FAIRSpectra - Enabling the FAIRification of Analytical Science

GBSN - Microbiology (Unit 1)

(May 9, 2024) Enhanced Ultrafast Vector Flow Imaging (VFI) Using Multi-Angle ...

Pulmonary drug delivery system M.pharm -2nd sem P'ceutics

Factory Acceptance Test( FAT).pptx .

Locating and isolating a gene, FISH, GISH, Chromosome walking and jumping, te...

Porella : features, morphology, anatomy, reproduction etc.

Chemistry 5th semester paper 1st Notes.pdf

OSFair2017 Workshop | Fear and loathing in Open Peer Review

1. FEAR AND LOATHING IN OPEN PEER REVIEW? JonTennant

2. No one really knows what it is • Open identities • Open reports • Open participation • Open interaction • Open pre-review manuscripts • Open final-version commenting • Open platforms https://f1000research.com/articles/6-588/v1 122 COMPETING DEFINITIONS

3. Peer review changed your relationship status to “It’s complicated.” https://f1000research.com/articles/6-1151/v1

4. The debate 1. How can referees receive credit or recognition for their work, and what form should this take. 2. Should referee reports be published alongside manuscripts. 3. Should referees remain anonymous or have their identities disclosed. 4. Should peer review occur prior or subsequent to the publication process (i.e., publish then filter).

5. Fear governs all • Refusal to perform peer review. • Appearing confrontational in public. • Abuse of power dynamics and intimidation. • Backlash from senior researchers. • Empowerment of bad actors. • Marginalisation of those with less power. • Researchers won’t be honest or critical.

6. Solutions I • Built-in accountability processes. • Transparency by default to level the playing field. • Assholes gonna asshole, so let’s find ways to deal with that (e.g., COPE). • Increase quality through accountability and identification. • Attach CC BY license and DOIs to peer reviews – make them citable. • Make peer reviews valued and part of permanent academic records. https://f1000research.com/articles/6-1151/v1

7. Solutions II • Make sure arguments and policies are evidence- based. • No, seriously. No evidence, no case.That includes your anecdata.Take it elsewhere. • Because we’re not talking about individuals here – we’re talking about systems comprising millions of individuals. • So you have to remain flexible. No one-size fits all. • Account for social and cultural norms and differences.

8. https://f1000research.com/articles/6-1151/v1

OSFair2017 Workshop | Fear and loathing in Open Peer Review

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Open Science Fair

More from Open Science Fair (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

OSFair2017 Workshop | Fear and loathing in Open Peer Review