Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

OSFair2017 Workshop | Collaborative reading and continuous peer review with PaperHive: keeping academic literature alive


Published on

Lisa Mattias talks about collaborative reading and continuous peer review | OSFair2017 Workshop

Workshop title: Open Access Models & Platforms

Workshop overview:
What are the emerging models of Open Access for publications? Who should be involved? How are costs distributed over the stakeholders involved? How can OA platforms innovate further to embrace Open Science? This workshop will discuss and showcase the range of models available, including their costs and organisational aspects, to discuss their relative strengths and weaknesses in different academic contexts.


Published in: Science
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

OSFair2017 Workshop | Collaborative reading and continuous peer review with PaperHive: keeping academic literature alive

  1. 1. collaborative reading and continuous peer review: keeping academic literature alive
  2. 2. THE COWORKING HUB FOR RESEARCHERS Read, discuss and annotate academic literature in collaboration
  3. 3. HOW DOES IT WORK? (1/2) Readers click the PaperHive widget on the publisher or repository article page...
  4. 4. HOW DOES IT WORK? (2/2) Users benefit from the engagement with the content and the interaction with other researchers
  5. 5. ● citable ● licensed under CC-BY ● support for LaTeX and Markdown ● following W3C Web Annotation standards ● archived ANNOTATIONS Аnnotations keep content alive and make it relevant at any point in time
  6. 6. Tool for lecturers and students * interactive seminars * higher engagement with required readings and textbooks Tool for editors, author, and readers * editorial updates * post-publication peer review * invited comments * reader feedback & questions WHY KEEP DOCUMENTS ALIVE? The collaborative approach helps sustain the relevance and quality of publications in the long-run
  7. 7. CASE STUDY: LANGUAGE SCIENCE PRESS The open access publisher uses PaperHive for manuscript peer review, community proofreading and post-publication outreach
  8. 8. CASE STUDY: (UNIVERSITY) REPOSITORIES Authors can quickly collect feedback to improve their manuscripts and attract attention to their results before the final publication
  9. 9. To learn more or integrate your content with PaperHive, write