Lisa Mattias talks about collaborative reading and continuous peer review | OSFair2017 Workshop Workshop title: Open Access Models & Platforms Workshop overview: What are the emerging models of Open Access for publications? Who should be involved? How are costs distributed over the stakeholders involved? How can OA platforms innovate further to embrace Open Science? This workshop will discuss and showcase the range of models available, including their costs and organisational aspects, to discuss their relative strengths and weaknesses in different academic contexts. When: DAY 1 - PARALLEL SESSION 1 & 2

1. collaborative reading and continuous peer review:
keeping academic literature alive

2. THE COWORKING HUB FOR RESEARCHERS
Read, discuss and annotate academic literature in collaboration

3. HOW DOES IT WORK? (1/2)
Readers click the PaperHive widget on the publisher or repository
article page...

4. HOW DOES IT WORK? (2/2)
Users benefit from the engagement with the content and the interaction
with other researchers

5. ● citable
● licensed under CC-BY
● support for LaTeX and Markdown
● following W3C Web Annotation standards
● archived
ANNOTATIONS
Аnnotations keep content alive and make it relevant at any point in time

6. Tool for lecturers and
students
* interactive seminars
* higher engagement with
required readings and
textbooks
Tool for editors, author, and
readers
* editorial updates
* post-publication peer review
* invited comments
* reader feedback & questions
WHY KEEP DOCUMENTS ALIVE?
The collaborative approach helps sustain the relevance and quality of
publications in the long-run

7. CASE STUDY: LANGUAGE SCIENCE PRESS
The open access publisher uses PaperHive for manuscript peer review,
community proofreading and post-publication outreach

8. CASE STUDY: (UNIVERSITY) REPOSITORIES
Authors can quickly collect feedback to improve their manuscripts and
attract attention to their results before the final publication

9. To learn more or
integrate your content with PaperHive,
write
info@paperhive.org