2. I
protect
water
quality
400
A
lot
Some
A
liEle
Not
at
all
350
300
Before
During
250
200
150
100
50
0
I
protect
water
quality.
A-er
A
lot
Some
3. I
help
restore
natural
habitats
and
protect
wildlife
300
250
Before
During
A-er
A
lot
Some
A
liEle
Not
at
all
A
lot
Some
200
150
100
50
0
I
help
restore
natural
habitats
and
protect
wildlife
4. I
know
about
local
plants
and
wildlife.
350
300
Before
During
A-er
A
lot
Some
A
liEle
Not
at
all
A
lot
Some
250
200
150
100
50
0
I
know
about
local
wildlife
and
na1ve
plants
5. I
pick
up
trash
and
recycle
at
school
and
at
home.
400
A
lot
Some
A
liEle
Not
at
all
350
300
Before
During
250
200
150
100
50
0
I
pick
up
trash
and
recycle
at
school
and
at
home
A-er
A
lot
Some
6. Spending
1me
in
nature
is
important
to
me.
400
A
lot
Some
A
liEle
Not
at
all
350
300
Before
During
250
200
150
100
50
0
Spending
1me
in
nature
is
important
to
me
A-er
A
lot
Some
7. I
talk
with
my
family
about
all
of
these
things.
250
Before
During
200
A-er
A
lot
Some
A
liEle
Not
at
all
A
lot
Some
150
100
50
0
I
talk
with
my
family
about
all
of
these
things
8. Teacher
results
–
Water
Quality
2012-‐2013
NREP
Water
Quality
Monitoring
Program
Number
of
Teachers
(Out
of
21)
25
20
15
Yes
10
No
5
0
Benefit
student
learning?
Helps
meet
state
standards?
Received
adequate
support
&
prep?
Include
a
pre-‐trip
Presenta1on?
Have
suppor1ng
curriculum?
Provide
a
meanigingful
experience
for
students?
9. Teacher
Results-‐
Habitat
Restora1on
2012-‐2013
NREP
Habitat
RestoraIon
Fieldtrips
12
NUmber
of
Teachers
(Out
of
11)
10
8
6
Yes
No
4
2
0
Benefit
student
learning?
Helps
meet
state
standards?
Received
adequate
support
&
prep?
Include
a
pre-‐trip
Presenta1on?
Have
suppor1ng
curriculum?
Provide
a
meanigingful
experience
for
students?
10. Teacher
Results
–
Salmon
Toss
2012-‐2013
NREP
Salmon
Toss
Fieldtrips
7
Numner
of
Teachers
(Out
of
6)
6
5
4
3
Yes
No
2
1
0
Benefit
student
learning?
Helps
meet
state
standards?
Received
adequate
support
&
prep?
Include
a
pre-‐trip
Presenta1on?
Have
suppor1ng
curriculum?
Provide
a
meanigingful
experience
for
students?
11. Teacher
Results-‐
Student
GREEN
Congress
2013
Student
GREEN
Congress
9
Number
of
Teachers
(Out
of
8)
8
7
6
5
4
Yes
No
3
2
1
0
Benefit
student
learning?
Helps
meet
state
standards?
Received
adequate
support
&
prep?
Include
a
pre-‐trip
Presenta1on?
Have
suppor1ng
curriculum?
Provide
a
meanigingful
experience
for
students?
12. Teacher
Results
–
Eye
on
Nature
2013
Eye
on
Nature
Field
Studies
7
Number
of
teachers
(Out
of
6)
6
5
4
3
Yes
No
2
1
0
Benefit
student
learning?
Helps
meet
state
standards?
Received
adequate
support
&
prep?
Include
a
pre-‐trip
Presenta1on?
Have
suppor1ng
curriculum?
Provide
a
meanigingful
experience
for
students?
13. Fun
Factoids
-‐
Teachers
• 21
Teachers
par1cipated
in
the
end-‐of-‐year
survey,
50%
of
the
2012-‐2013
NREP
par1cipants.
• 19%
par1cipated
in
only
Water
Quality
Monitoring
• 33%
par1cipated
in
WQM
and
at
least
one
other
NREP
ac1vity.
• 33%
par1cipated
in
WQM
and
at
two
other
NREP
ac1vi1es.
• 10%
par1cipated
in
WQM
and
three
other
ac1vi1es.
5%
par1cipated
in
WQM
and
four
other
ac1vi1es.
• 90%
of
teachers
will
be
par1cipa1ng
in
2013-‐2014
NREP
ac1vi1es
• 30%
of
NREP
teachers
aEended
(or
intended
to)
Summer
Teacher
Ins1tute.
• 24%
Intend
on
aEending
Fall's
Networking
Mee1ng.
• 57%
of
teachers
find
Networking
Mee1ngs
helpful.
• 81%
Believe
they
have
ample
volunteer
support
for
fieldtrips.
•
90%
are
up
to
date
with
their
WQM
Training.
• 81%
feel
that
they
are
supported
by
colleagues
and
prinicipals.
14. 2013-‐2014
Program
Evalua1on
• Working
with
South
Sound
GREEN,
Chehalis
Basin
Educa1on
Consor1um
and
NREP
• Todd
Johnson
ESD
113
o Merging
our
survey
approach
with
current
research
from
NOAA/
BWET/MWEE/original
GREEN
program
o Pilot
13-‐14
o Online
14-‐15