ΑΝΑΔΗΜΟΣΙΕΥΣΗ ΑΠΟ ΤΟ ΣΗΜΕΡΑ ΑΝΕΝΕΡΓΟ ΜΠΛΟΓΚ “ΟΙ ΡΩΜΙΟΙ ΤΗΣ ΑΝΑΤΟΛΗΣ” Το κείμενο του κ. Νίκου Μπαϋρακτάρη είχε αρχικά δημοσιευθεί την 14η Φεβρουαρίου 2019

1. Εγκληματίες
Οριενταλιστές
Αποικιοκράτες κι
Αμόρφωτοι
Μεροληπτικοί
Αναγεννησιακοί: ο κ.
Μεγαλομμάτης τινάζει
στον Αέρα τα Σάπια
Θεμέλια της
Νεώτερης Δύσης
https://greeksoftheorient.wordpress.com/2019/0
2/14/εγκληματίες-οριενταλιστές-αποικιοκρ/
===============

2. Οι Ρωμιοί της Ανατολής –
Greeks of the Orient
Ρωμιοσύνη, Ρωμανία, Ανατολική Ρωμαϊκή
Αυτοκρατορία
Εγκληματίες
Οριενταλιστές
Αποικιοκράτες κι
Αμόρφωτοι
Μεροληπτικοί
Αναγεννησιακοί: ο κ.
Μεγαλομμάτης τινάζει
στον Αέρα τα Σάπια

3. Θεμέλια της
Νεώτερης Δύσης
Οι αναγεννησιακοί διανοητές, φιλόλογοι,
καλλιτέχνες, αρχιτέκτονες, φιλόσοφοι κι
ιστορικοί ήταν εντελώς αμόρφωτοι σχετικά
με την ιστορία, τις γλώσσες και τους
πολιτισμούς σχεδόν όλων των αρχαίων
ανατολικών εθνών κι αυτοκρατοριών, όλων
των χριστιανικών εθνών, και των
μουσουλμανικών λαών της εποχής
τους. Και μέσα στη θλιβερή αυτή
αμορφωσιά τους νόμισαν ότι με λίγα
λατινικά κι αρχαία ελληνικά θα μπορούσαν
να ανασυνθέσουν την Ιστορία της
Ανθρωπότητας.
Χωρίς να γνωρίζουν αρχαίες (νεκρές)
γλώσσες και γραφές των μεγάλων αρχαίων
ανατολικών πολιτισμών και χωρίς να
ενδιαφέρονται να μάθουν σύγχρονές τους

4. γλώσσες και γραφές των χριστιανικών,
μουσουλμανικών κι άλλων εθνών, οι
αναγεννησιακοί διανοητές,
φιλόλογοι, καλλιτέχνες, αρχιτέκτονες,
φιλόσοφοι κι ιστορικοί είχαν όλη την
απροσμέτρητη αλαζονεία ενός αμόρφωτου
ξερόλα, την άρρωστη νοοτροπία
ενός θρασύδειλου απατεώνα, και την
διανοητική ανωμαλία ενός ημιμαθούς
καυχησιάρη.
Διαβάζοντας λατινικά κι αρχαία ελληνικά
νόμιζαν οι γελοίοι αναγεννησιακοί ότι
μαθαίνουν επίσης και για άλλους λαούς και
πολιτισμούς, επειδή αρχαίοι Έλληνες και
Ρωμαίοι είχαν προσπαθήσει να πάρουν τα
φώτα των μεγάλων αρχαίων ανατολικών
πολιτισμών και να μορφωθούν από
εκείνους, αφήνοντας έτσι πολλές αναφορές
για την Αίγυπτο, την Μεσοποταμία, την
Φοινίκη, την Ανατολία, την Περσία κι
άλλες περιοχές όπου είχαν αναπτυχθεί
μεγαλύτεροι κι αρχαιότεροι πολιτισμοί.

5. Όμως οι αναγεννησιακοί διανοητές,
φιλόλογοι, καλλιτέχνες, αρχιτέκτονες,
φιλόσοφοι κι ιστορικοί ούτε προς στιγμήν
διανοήθηκαν ότι τα αρχαία ελληνικά και
λατινικά κείμενα δεν αποτελούν τεκμήρια
αλήθειας παρά μόνον για την αρχαία Ελλάδα
και την Ρώμη, κι ότι δεν έχουν παρά μικρή
μόνον αξία ως δευτερεύουσες και
μεταγενέστερες πηγές για την Βαβυλώνα,
την Ασσυρία, την Αίγυπτο και το Ιράν.
Ανάξια λόγου συχνά, αληθινά αρκετές φορές,
λαθεμένα ως επί το πλείστον, τα αρχαία
ελληνικά και λατινικά κείμενα για τους
αρχαίους ανατολικούς πολιτισμούς δεν
ανασυστήνουν την Αρχαία Ιστορία της
Ανατολής και της Αρχής του Ανθρωπίνου
Γένους αλλά περιγράφουν μόνον τι από τους
αρχαίους πολιτισμούς κατάλαβαν οι Αρχαίοι
Έλληνες και Ρωμαίοι.
Οπότε, οι αναγεννησιακοί διανοητές,
φιλόλογοι, καλλιτέχνες, αρχιτέκτονες,
φιλόσοφοι κι ιστορικοί, παρασυρόμενοι από
την προχειρότητά τους και την μεγαλαυχία

6. τους, διαμόρφωσαν γνώμη σχετικά με τους
αρχαίους ανατολικούς πολιτισμούς, όταν δεν
είχαν τα κατάλληλα στοιχεία, τις
πρωτογενείς πηγές αποκρυπτογραφημένες,
για να διαμορφώσουν γνώμη.
Έτσι, προϊδεασμένες απόψεις και λάθος
γνώμες για το αντικείμενό τους
επικρατούσαν μέσα στα μυαλά των πρώτων
οριενταλιστών που προσπάθησαν να
ανεύρουν, να αποκρυπτογραφήσουν, και να
μελετήσουν τα υπολείμματα των αρχαίων
ανατολικών πολιτισμών 300 ολόκληρα
χρόνια μετά τους αναγεννησιακούς.
Πολλά προβλήματα που καθορίζουν
αρνητικά τις σημερινές παγκόσμιες
εξελίξεις έχουν την αρχή τους στα
αφετηριακά λάθη των οριενταλιστών του
18ου, του 19ου και του 20ου αιώνα. Και σ’
αυτά προστίθενται κι οι πολιτικές
σκοπιμότητες των αποικιοκρατικών
χωρών, κυρίως της Γαλλίας και της
Αγγλίας, στις οποίες οι πρώτοι
οριενταλιστές ως επί το πλείστον ανήκαν.

7. Αυτοί δεν είδαν στην Ανατολή παρά το τι
ήθελαν να δουν κι όχι την αληθινή
πραγματικότητα. Και δεν ανέπτυξαν τις
ανθρωπιστικές και τις ανατολιστικές
επιστήμες για να αναζητήσουν, ανεύρουν
και καταστήσουν γνωστή την αλήθεια αλλά
για να προωθήσουν τα αποικιοκρατικά
συμφέροντά τους, να επιβάλουν τις
διαστροφικές ιδέες τους και την άνομη κι
αντίχριστη εξουσία τους, και να βουλιάξουν
όλο τον υπόλοιπο κόσμο στην αμορφωσιά,
στον βαρβαρισμό, στην άγνοια, σε απώλεια
ιστορικής ταυτότητας, σε απεμπόληση
πολιτισμικής συνείδησης και σε μια
απερίγραπτη πολιτισμική διαστροφή.
Αλλού δημιούργησαν ανύπαρκτα έθνη,
αλλού έστησαν εξυπαρχής αποτυχημένα
κράτη, αλλού απέκρυψαν και προσπάθησαν
να καταστρέψουν πανάρχαια έθνη που
επιβίωσαν μέχρι τις μέρες μας, και σε
πολλές περιπτώσεις επέβαλαν ψευδέστατη
ταυτότητα και όνομα σε έθνη που τα
χρειάζονταν μόνον ως άβουλα πιόνια,

8. ταπεινά σκλαβάκια, κι απλά εργαλεία της
απάνθρωπης διεθνούς πολιτικής τους.
Αυτά και πολύ περισσότερα καταλογίζει ο
διακεκριμένος Έλληνας ανατολιστής
ιστορικός και πολιτικός επιστήμονας καθ.
Μουχάμαντ Σαμσαντίν Μεγαλομμάτης στους
Γάλλους, Άγγλους κι Αμερικανούς
ανατολιστές κι αποικιοκράτες και στους
αναγεννησιακούς προκατόχους τους.
Κάνει μάλιστα λόγο και για απαγορευμένες
επιστήμες, όπως η Αραμαιολογία – ένας
κλάδος ανατολιστικών επιστημών που δεν
υπήρξε ποτέ επειδή οι αποικιοκρατικές
δυνάμεις της Δύσης απλά δεν επιθυμούσαν
να δημιουργηθεί στην Μέση Ανατολή ένα
ανεξάρτητο χριστιανικό αραμαϊκό κράτος.
Έτσι τα τμήματα / περιεχόμενα αυτού του
κλάδου μοιράστηκαν σε άλλες ειδικότητες
έτσι ώστε να μην υπάρξει Αραμαιολογία
όπως υπάρχουν Ιρανολογία, Τουρκολογία,
Αιγυπτιολογία, Κοπτολογία, κοκ.
Αναδημοσιεύω ολόκληρο το άρθρο του
Έλληνα ανατολιστή που δίνει μόνον ένα

9. γενικό πλαίσιο των πολιτιστικών
εγκλημάτων που έγιναν από τους Γάλλους,
Άγγλους κι Αμερικανούς αποικιοκράτες
ανατολιστές στο όνομα της επιστήμης. Η
φωτογραφία κι ο υπότιτλος είναι από το
άρθρο του κ. Μεγαλομμάτη.
Oblivious Colonial
Orientalists and
Aramaeology, a
Prohibited Science
https://www.aramnahrin.org/English/Ara
maeology_And_Colonialims_8_6_2007.htm

10. The modern disciplines of Humanities
emanated out of Renaissance intellectuals’
interest for the Antiquity, and the reason
they mainly evolved around Classical
Antiquity is the fact that Latin and
Ancient Greek were the traditionally
known and preserved, among scholars,
languages of the Antiquity.
The Orient, as the Epitome of the Other,
had to be murderous, as if the West was
not; that is why Alexandre Cabanel
deployed great effort to depict Cleopatra
testing poisons on her prisoners, as if the

11. murderous Frankish kings carried out less
appalling crimes…
The modern disciplines of Humanities, as
developed by European universities first,
and through successive stages since the
17th century (and more notably during
the last two centuries), were a model that
expanded in universities throughout all
continents. They emanated out of
Renaissance intellectuals’ interest for the
Antiquity, and the reason they mainly
evolved around Classical Antiquity is the
fact that Latin and Ancient Greek were
the traditionally known and preserved,
among scholars, languages of the
Antiquity.
European Renaissance: indifferent for
Ancient Hebrew, Coptic, Aramaic Syriac,
Armenian, Georgian, Old Slavic, and
Arabic

12. Other languages were also known and
continually studied in Medieval and
Renaissance Europe, such as Ancient
Hebrew, Coptic, Aramaic Syriac,
Armenian, Georgian, Old Slavic, and
Arabic. But all these ‘marginal’ – for the
Europeans – languages were the
communication means of cultures and
civilizations that were not at the
epicenter of the Renaissance Search for
Antiquity.
Ancient Hebrew pertained to the Biblical
Antiquity, being related to a mostly
religious state, that of Israel, and its
successor Judah. It was later used for
writing down the Talmud and the other
original sources of Judaism, a religion
that was constantly and severely
persecuted either in Western Europe or in
the Eastern Roman Empire. Only the
successive Islamic Caliphates tolerated
Judaism, and Jews were influential in
Baghdad, Cordoba, Kairwan, Cairo,

13. Samarqand and Istanbul. Of course, this
has to be interpreted as a genuine Persian
influence on the Islamic Caliphatic
politics and political ideology and
practice; it goes back to the favourable
position the Jews enjoyed within the
Achaemenidian Iranian, (550 – 330
BCE), Arsacid Parthian (250 BCE – 224
CE) and Sassanid Persian (224 – 651
BCE) courts.
Coptic, Aramaic Syriac, Armenian,
Georgian and Old Slavic were relevant to
various Christian states and cultures,
either Orthodox, Monophysitic (we
employ the term conventionally here, as
we do not accept its veracity) or Nestorian
(another pejorative term introduced by
Constantinople and Rome four centuries
before their Schism about the followers of
Nestorius, leading Christian philosopher,
theologian and ideologist, who like Arius
provided a far more accurate approach to
Jesus than official Christianity down to

14. our days). All these states and cultures
were religious of nature, and in addition
they were viewed inimically by the
Catholic political power of Medieval
Europe.
Arabic was the language of the Coran and
Prophet Muhammad, whom Dante had
denigrated in an unprecedented way; it
was the official language of Catholic
Europe’s worst enemy, especially from the
times of the Crusades onwards. Holy
language for the followers of a religion
repeatedly depicted by Christian authors
as the quintessence of the Antichrist,
Arabic could hardly be a matter of study,
when wars were engaged in Iberia,
Western Mediterranean and Central
Europe.
Above all, Latin and Ancient Greek were
viewed by the Renaissance and Classicism
intellectuals as key to understanding
historical sources with reference to states,
cultures and civilizations whereby

15. religion did not shape the society
exclusively, and religious authorities
were separate from the executive – or this
was what these Renaissance and
Classicism intellectuals had preconceived
in their minds due to lack of adequate
and abundant information…..
Were there other civilizations and
cultures whereby the religious authority
did not impose its norms and principles
on the judiciary, the legislative and the
executive? Possibly, but the Renaissance
and Classicism intellectuals had not
access to original sources about Ancient
Carthage, Anatolia (in today’s Turkey),
Egypt, Phoenicia, Syria, Yemen, Ethiopia
(in today’s Sudan), Mesopotamia, Persia,
and India. All they could know about
these cultures and civilizations was due
to posterior and obviously distorting
sources: Hebrew, Greek and Latin.

16. This is the reason, until the end of the
18th century, Humanities meant mostly
Classical Studies, and Biblical Studies.
The rise of the Orientalist Disciplines
With the colonial expansion of Spain and
Portugal to the Indies, the subsequent
Anglo-French rivalry for India, and the
French expedition to Egypt, a small
number of researchers, explorers,
academicians, agents and adventurers
started being versed into various old texts,
undeciphered inscriptions and
manuscripts, antiquities and antiques
gathered from any corner of the areas
they were traveling through! The
military, political, economic competition
was transferred to the academic level, and
within a century from the moment
Anquetil Duperron disembarked at
Pondicherry, several ancient writings
were already deciphered. The 19th
century attested the rise of the Orientalist

17. disciplines, namely Egyptology,
Assyriology, Iranology, Indology, Sinology,
Islamology. This was not an easy process –
in any sense.
The Orientalist project went wrong from
the very beginning because of
preconceived ideas, concepts and schemes
that should have been eliminated first,
before the fresh discoveries determine the
historical truth in the most objective,
neutral and unbiased way it could be
possibly obtained. Because this was not
done, many discoveries have been kept for
more than 100 years under silence. The
average public in Europe and America,
and throughout the world, has not yet got
access to original sources discovered before
numerous decades, and their contents
have not been incorporated in Education
manuals as they should, if Truth and
True History of the Mankind are still
sought after. The world keeps living based
on erroneous descriptions, false (as

18. incomplete and mono-dimensional)
historical data, and even more disastrous
interpretations and fact perceptions. This
automatically guarantees ignorance,
wrong choices, and error repetition.
Even worse, there were numerous and
multifaceted political motivations and
shadowy ideological machinations
behind the Orientalist experiment; one of
them was the use of the discoveries in
order to shape the History model, and to
depict the course of the World History in
a way that would best suit the colonial
academia’s preconceived ideas and
undeniably biased concepts.
Another vast issue has been the political
use of the Orientalist discoveries in a way
to possibly corroborate the peremptory
division between West and East (which is
an artificial, Manichaean concept and a
ridiculous factoid) and, even more
strikingly, the fallacy of West’s
(Occident’s) superiority over the East

19. (Orient). ‘West’ meant mainly France and
England, whereas East was exclusively
the Ottoman Empire and Iran, as Mughal
India had already collapsed. It was a
sheer anti-Islamic action of deeply
preconceived and pre-arranged
machinations. It was only normal for it to
have political repercussions, cultural –
educational consequences, and economic
ramifications that sooner or later would
engulf the entire Mankind into a most
definite disaster.
A most inhuman machination and
practice consisted in the political decision
of the colonial powers to preserve the
unearthed and deciphered knowledge as a
hidden secret, far from the hands of the
political authorities of the areas where
the material record was collected. They
stored an incredible amount of
antiquities in the Paris and London
museums, therefore pulling a great
number of Europeans and Northern

20. Americans to compete and do the same,
although the real profit would go to the
Anglo-French colonial scheme. Even
worse, they deliberately caused vibrant
reactions among the most obscurantist and
extremist elements of those societies –
throughout the Ottoman Empire and Iran
– in order to further engulf the
populations and the elites of these
countries in deep and permanent
ignorance, perverse and unjustified
hatred, and definite weakness ensuing
precisely from the lack of knowledge, i.e.
the monuments and the associated data
that the Western explorers were first
unearthing and deciphering, and second
exploiting, altering and falsifying.
Thus, although Ancient Greek was
imposed as obligatory course in the
Secondary Education of the 1828 tiny
Greek state that was helped to separate
from the Ottoman Empire (according to
the Anglo-French plans for that state’s

21. further role), not a single Egyptian had
studied Egyptian Hieroglyphics 80 years
after Champollion deciphered that
writing, and never until today (2007) a
course of Egyptian Hieroglyphic was
introduced in the Egyptian Secondary
Education, contrarily to what has been
the common practice in Greece where
schoolchildren study, during the
Secondary Education, hundreds of pages
of Ancient Greek Literature.
The Orientalism of the criminal Anglo-
French colonials was the key tool used to
ensure the imposition of all sorts of false
dogmas and doctrines of History that have
been dictatorially imposed and widely
taught throughout all the former
Ottoman, Persian and Indian provinces
that became first colonized territories,
only to later turn to post-colonial
uneducated realms of Barbary, with the
only exception of Turkey, more recently
followed by India and Malaysia.

22. This reality, the mere fact that all the
educational systems from Greece to Sudan
and from Morocco to Indonesia have
practically been of Anglo-French
machination and inspiration, makes of
all these realms permanently colonized,
bogus-states prone to manipulation, and
genuinely unable to conceive – let alone
defend – their real national identity and
interests. However, it is not our intention
to discuss in this article the political
repercussions and ramifications of
Western Orientalism.
Structural problems of the Orientalist
disciplines
At the end, we should add that there were
also structural difficulties in the
formation of the Orientalist disciplines. In
many cases, scholars embarked into the
effort of deciphering a writing the
identity of which they did not know. In
some cases, inscriptions were found in a

23. language the very existence of which was
unknown to the best scholars of the
period. Like this, specialists penetrated
from one sector to another, unveiling the
mysteries of great civilizations and
cultures far more elaborate, sophisticated
and advanced than the Ancient Greeks
and Romans 2500 years before
Epameinondas and Caesar. Then, the new
discipline (for instance Sumerology) could
not be included within the earlier
shaped discipline (Assyriology), as the two
civilizations, cultures and languages
(Sumerian and Assyrian – Babylonian)
were more different one from another
than the Ancient Greek civilization from
the Roman civilization!
To give another – comparative – example,
the decipherment of the Egyptian
Hieroglyphics led to the formation of
Egyptology, as the Orientalist discipline of
Humanities that focuses on all things
Egyptian before the Christianization of

24. Egypt and until the twilight of the
Ancient Egyptian Civilization. But due to
the decipherment of the Old Persian
Cuneiform (the scripture in use at the
Achaemenidian times of Cyrus, Cambyses,
Darius, Xerxes and their successors) we
were not helped only to form the basics of
Iranology but we were also empowered to
go ahead for the decipherment of Ancient
Babylonian and Assyrian Cuneiform, and
consequently establish Assyriology.
Although slightly similar in the writing
system, Ancient Iranian – as Indo-
European language – was far closer to
Greek than to Assyrian. Assyriology
turned out to be the mainstream
discipline of the Orientalist sector that
focalizes on Ancient – mainly but not
exclusively Semitic – Mesopotamia. As a
tit for tat, the decipherment of the
Assyrian Babylonian Cuneiform opened
the way for the discovery of the worlds of
the Ancient Hurrians, the Ancient Hittites

25. and Hatti of Anatolia, the Ancient Elam,
and above all the spectacular discovery of
Sumer, the world’s most ancient
civilization. Sumer was actually the first
organized Human Society, but its name
was completely unknown to either
Hebrew, Greek or Latin sources. This
development broke Assyriology to
numerous sections that were first kind of
‘branches’ but have been so far developed
into absolutely independent Orientalist
disciplines, Elamology, Hittitology and
Sumerology.
Then, the issue of Area Studies and the
historical representation of modern
nations’ past and identity came to surface.
It was understood that the best way for
anyone to study German civilization,
culture, language and literature was to
include Latin since the Ancient History of
Germany is mostly known due to Latin
sources. No matter what you opt for in a
French university, Lettres Classiques or

26. Lettres Modernes, you take some courses of
Latin and Vieux Français.
When it comes to Classical Studies,
universities – beyond the mainstream
syllabus – offer Aeolian, Doric and
Ionian dialects, Linear II (deciphered and
identified as the earlier form of Achaean
Greek), Alexandrian Greek Koine,
Papyrology, and Medieval Greek.
And when a student wants to pursue Area
Studies with focus on Greece in an
American university, the syllabus does
not only encompass Ancient, Medieval
and Modern Greek, but also comprises
various courses in Philosophy, Literature,
History, Art History and Archeology that
cover either Antiquity or Middle Ages and
Modern Times.
The same practice is attested in
Departments focused in Area Studies on
Italy, Spain, and Russia. Quite contrarily,
and for reasons pertaining to the nucleus
of the perfidious forgery of History as

27. carried out by the colonial machinations,
this practice did not apply to the
historically most important people of the
last 3000 years: the Aramaeans. Why this
happened, and how this academic forgery
will be contravened we will analyze in a
separate article.
Μπορείτε να κατεβάσετε το άρθρο του κ.
Μεγαλομμάτη σε Word doc εδώ:
https://www.academia.edu/34785813/Ob
livious_Colonial_Orientalists_and_Aramae
ology_a_Prohibited_Science