SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 45
Michael J. Econs, M.D.
Professor of Medicine
Indiana University School of Medicine
Indianapolis, IN 46202
Update on Management of Osteoporosis
Faculty Disclosure
It is the policy of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research
(ASBMR) and The France Foundation to ensure balance, independence,
objectivity, and scientific rigor in all its sponsored educational activities. All
faculty participating in this activity will disclose to the participants any
significant financial interest or other relationship with manufacturer(s) of any
commercial product(s)/device(s) and/or provider(s) of commercial services
included in this educational activity. The intent of this disclosure is not to
prevent a faculty member with a relevant financial or other relationship from
participating in the activity, but rather to provide participants with
information on which they can base their own judgments. The American
Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR) and The France Foundation
have identified and resolved any and all faculty conflicts of interest prior to
the release of this activity.
This activity is supported by an educational grant from Amgen Inc.
Learning Objectives
• Improve the ability to assess risk factors for osteoporosis
and apply evidence-based screening recommendations
to these at-risk patients within one’s practice
• Develop strategies to improve the treatment of patients
with osteoporosis
• Utilize the tools and other information in this initiative,
including patient education tools and systems-based
approaches, to facilitate improving the assessment and
care being provided to patients with osteoporosis
Agenda
20 minutes Slide lecture
20 minutes Case exercise in small groups
10 minutes Discussion
Resources
for you to
keep
Pretest Case
Worksheet
Posttest Evaluation
Tear off
now to
take home
Please
complete the
quick pretest
NOW
For the
small group
exercise later
Complete these
when the activity
is over
When we’re done, leave on your seat or pass to staff
Activity Packets
Everyone should have a packet
Primary Care Providers Are Critical
for Osteoporosis Management
Screening, Diagnosis, and Treatment
Osteoporosis is under-recognized
Fractures are not recognized as sentinel events
Osteoporosis is under-treated
American Society for
Bone and Mineral
Research (ASBMR)
and The France
Foundation
2013
2014
Education for PCPs
Live Meetings and
Online CME (free)
www.osteoCME.org
2000 NIH Consensus Development Conference
Definition of Osteoporosis
Normal Bone
Osteoporotic Bone
• A skeletal disorder characterized by
– Compromised bone strength predisposing to
– An increased risk of fracture
• Bone strength reflects the integration of
two main features:
– Bone density
– Bone quality
Osteoporosis Is a Serious
Public Health Problem
• Affects 10.2 million Americans (80% women)
• 2 million fractures yearly
• Direct cost $17 billion
Distribution of Fractures
Osteoporosis in Perspective
53 M
36 M
48 M
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Low Bone
Mass +/or
Osteoporosis
Uncontrolled
HT
Uncontrolled
LDL
Americans
with
Risk
Factors,
in
Millions
Identified Treatment Gap
NCQA HEDIS
HEDIS Measure % Compliance*
Beta-blocker persistence
after a heart attack
88.5%
Breast cancer screening 67.5%
Colorectal cancer screening 58.4%
Osteoporosis management for women
after a fracture
25.0%
NCQA The State of Health Care Quality 2013.
https://www.ncqa.org/ReportCards/HealthPlans/StateofHealthCareQuality.aspx. Accessed August 2014.
*2012 Medicare Rates
Patient Care Goals
• Identify patients at risk of fractures
• Reduce incidence of fractures
• Maintain quality of life
– Activity
– Independence
– Health
National Osteoporosis Foundation
2014 Guidelines
• Universal (risk, diet, vitamin D,
exercise, smoking, monitoring)
• Diagnosis (BMD, vertebral imaging,
causes of secondary osteoporosis)
• Monitoring (BMD)
• Treatment (initiation criteria, options,
duration)
Major clinical recommendations
http://www. http://nof.org/hcp/resources/913. Accessed August 2014.
2014 Universal Recommendations
http://www.nof.org/hcp/practice/tools. Accessed August 2014.
Counsel on the risk of fractures
Eat a diet rich in fruits and vegetables (supplemented if
necessary) to a total calcium intake of
• 1000 mg per day for men 50-70
• 1200 mg per day for women ≥ 51
• 1200 mg per day for men ≥ 71
Vitamin D intake should be 800-1000 IU per day (age ≥50),
supplemented if necessary
Regular weight-bearing and muscle-strengthening exercise
Fall prevention evaluation and training
Cessation of tobacco use and avoidance of excessive alcohol
intake
Who Should Have a Bone Density Test?
AAFP and NOF
AAFP: Sweet MG, et al. Am Fam Physician. 2009;79(3):193-200.
NOF: National Osteoporosis Foundation. Clinician’s Guide to Prevention and Treatment of Osteoporosis.
www.nof.org. Accessed August 2014.
Women age 65 and older
Men age 70 and older
Postmenopausal women and men ages 50–69
with clinical risk factors
Adults who have a fracture after age 50
Adults with a condition (e.g., rheumatoid arthritis)
or taking a medication (e.g., glucocorticoids)
associated with low bone mass or bone loss
WHO Criteria for
Postmenopausal Osteoporosis
The T-score compares an individual’s BMD with the
mean value for young adults and expresses
the difference as a standard deviation score
Category T-score
Normal -1.0 and above
Low bone mass
(osteopenia)
-1.0 to -2.5
Osteoporosis -2.5 and below
http://www.who.int/chp/topics/Osteoporosis.pdf. Accessed August 2014.
WHO Study Group. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser. 1994;843:1-129.
Web Version 3.4
http://www.shef.ac.uk/FRAX/. Accessed August 2014.
Benefits of FRAX
Derives 10-year probability of
clinical event
from measurable parameters
Internationally recognized and
validated
Based on data from multiple
cohorts
Easily accessible on the Internet or
DXA software
Helps identify patients who need
treatment
Can be used to reassure low-risk
patients
Not valid to monitor patients on
treatment
Only femoral neck BMD is considered
Risk is “yes/no” – there is no
consideration of “dose”
(e.g., fractures, glucocorticoids,
smoking, alcohol)
Not all risk factors are included (eg,
risk of falling)
Clinical judgment is required
Do patients with high FRAX scores
benefit from medication? (Unknown)
Limitations of FRAX
Watts NB, et al. J Bone Miner Res 2009;24:975-979.
Whom to Treat: NOF Guidelines 2014
Women ≥ 65 and men ≥ 70
(younger with risk factors)
T-score between -1.0 and -2.5
T-score ≤ -2.5 in the lumbar spine,
total hip, or femoral neck
or
Hip or spine fracture (clinical or radiographic)
DXA test
≥ 3% for hip fracture
or
≥ 20% for major osteoporotic fractures
FRAX
10-y fracture risk
Candidate for
TREATMENT
YES
YES
nof.org/hcp/resources/913. Accessed August 2014.
FDA-approved Medications
Osteoporosis
Post-
menopausal
Glucocorticoid-
induced Male
Drug Prevent Treat Prevent Treat
Estrogen 
Calcitonin* (Miacalcin®, Fortical®) 
Raloxifene (Evista®)  
Ibandronate (Boniva®)  
Alendronate (Fosamax®)    
Risedronate (Actonel®)     
Risedronate (Atelvia®) 
Zoledronate (Reclast®)     
Denosumab (Prolia™)  
Teriparatide (Forteo®)   
Diab DL, Watts NB. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 2013;42(2):305-317.
Drug
Vertebral
Fracture
Nonvertebral
Fracture
Hip
Fracture
Calcitonin 
Raloxifene 
Ibandronate 
Alendronate   
Risedronate   
Zoledronic acid   
Denosumab   
Teriparatide  
Evidence for Fracture Reduction
Diab DL, Watts NB. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 2013;42(2):305-317.
Choosing an Antiresorptive Agent
Efficacy
“broad spectrum” antifracture efficacy
(alendronate, risedronate, zoledronate,
denosumab)
Route of
administration
oral (fasting or with food) or parenteral
Frequency of
administration
daily, weekly, monthly, quarterly, twice yearly,
once yearly
Side
effects/tolerability
depends on agent and patient
Non-skeletal effects breast cancer reduction (raloxifene)
Cost/insurance
coverage
generic oral; drugs “administered by health
professional” covered by Medicare Part B
Factors That May Reduce Adherence
Etiology Possible Factors
Patient-related • Lack of understanding of condition or
potential treatment benefits
• Patient motivation for treatment
• Comorbid conditions
• Cognitive dysfunction/forgetfulness
• No fracture history or symptoms
• Dissatisfactions with healthcare professional
interaction
Medication-related • Cost
• Dosing regimen/frequency
• Side effects
• Safety misconceptions
• Monitor treatment with DXA every 1–2 years
– Do not "over-interpret" change
– Be happy when BMD is stable OR increasing
• Why do some patients lose BMD on treatment?
– Adherence
– Drug pharmacokinetics
– Underlying disorders that need to be addressed
• Patients on treatment whose BMD remains low are at
high risk of fracture and may benefit from longer
treatment
Monitoring
Secondary Fracture Prevention
• A fracture is a sentinel event
• A fracture in a person over 50 is the most powerful risk factor
for a future fracture
• Many high risk patients have their fractures successfully
treated but do NOT receive assessment and treatment to
prevent the next fracture
• Fracture Liaison Service (FLS) is an emerging model for
secondary prevention
Fracture Liaison Services
• FLS coordinator orchestrates care following a minimal
trauma fracture
• Several models in use internationally
• Positive impact
– Increased BMD testing rates
– Therapy initiation rates
• Insufficient data
– Cost-effectiveness
– Secondary fracture reduction
Ganda K, et al. Osteoporos Int. 2013;24(2):393-406.
Dehamchia-Rehailia N, et al. Osteoporos Int. 2014;25(10):2409-2416.
Management Rates After Fracture
Women Men
DXA 19.0% 10.2%
Treatment 18.6% 9.6%
• Retrospective cohort study
• 2000-2009
• 88,571 women; 41,984 men
• Management within 1 year of frailty fracture:
Balasubramanian A, et al.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014;96(7):e52.
Treatment Rates Are Decreasing
Patients
Initiating
Treatment
Within
1
Year
of
Fracture
(%)
Balasubramanian A, et al.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014;96(7):e52.
Year
Women Men
Evaluation and Treatment for Osteoporosis:
Not Just One Quick Visit
Initial Evaluation
Order DXA
Assess Fx Risk
If Fx Risk is Low,
discuss calcium & Vit D,
Stop for Now
Reevaluate Later
If Fx Risk is
Borderline or High,
Schedule Second Visit
Second Visit
Review DXA/Fx Risk
Discuss Calcium and Vitamin D
Order Labs if Needed
Discuss Rx Options
Schedule Third Visit
Third Visit
Review Labs, Act if Needed
Select Rx
Schedule Follow Up
• CBC
• Calcium, kidney tests, liver
tests, and phosphorus
• 25-OH vitamin D
• 24 hour urine calcium
• Testosterone (in men)
Where Are We Now?
Improved awareness
Excellent diagnostic tools
available
FRAX is a quantitative risk
assessment
Safe and effective
individualized treatment
Better understanding of
pathogenesis
Federal initiatives to
improve care
The Good News
Under-recognition of patients at risk
for fracture
Decreasing access to DXA
Poor patient understanding of
risk/benefit
Increasing patient concerns
about side effects
Fewer patients on therapy
Poor adherence
• 30% of patients don’t pick up new
bisphosphonate prescriptions
• Risk of fracture increased 30–40%
Ross S, et al. Value Health. 2011;14(4):571-581.
Reynolds K, et al. Osteoporos Int. 2013; 24(9):2509-2517.
The Bad News
What Can I Do
as a PCP?
Practical Steps
Patient Dialog
• Risk/benefit discussion
• Shared decision making
Decision Aids
• Electronic records
• Checklist for risk
• Handouts/ Web sites
Engage the Care Team
• Counseling, follow-up
• ID high-risk patients
Manage Nonadherence
• Identify individual barriers
• Address barriers
Summary
What is
osteoporosis?
Decreased bone strength predisposing to an
increased risk of fracture
Why should
you care?
Common, significant cost, morbidity and
mortality
Whom to test
and how?
DXA for all women by age 65, higher risk
women earlier; FRAX is a useful tool
Whom to treat
and how?
Individuals at high risk of fracture; approved
agents are safe and effective; treatment
decisions must be individualized
Case Workshop: Small Group Exercise
Everyone should have a packet
We’re going to use the green sheet for this exercise.
1. I will present part of a case
2. Your small group will have 4 minutes to discuss it
3. After 4 minutes, I’ll present the next part of the case
4. You will have 4 minutes to discuss next steps
5. Finally, we will review the case for 10 minutes
Resources
for you to
keep
Pretest Case
Worksheet
Posttest Evaluation
Patient Presentation: “Emily”
• 73-year-old Caucasian woman
• Recent wrist fracture – fell in parking lot due
to uneven surface
Emily: Patient History 1
• Medical
− Hypertension
− Menopause at age 48, treated with estrogen
until age 61
− No prior fracture
• Family
− No history of osteoporosis or fracture
Emily: Patient History 2
• Social
− Married
− Tobacco: 20 pack year history; quit 1985
− Alcohol: 2 glasses of wine per week
− Caffeine: Coffee and tea, each 2 cups per day
− Calcium/Vitamin D: yogurt 1 serving/day, greens
regularly
− Exercise: none regularly
• Medications
− Multivitamin daily containing 400 mg calcium and
400 IU vitamin D
− Lisinopril: 10 mg daily
Other Data
• Review of systems
− No prior falls, no balance issues
− Nocturia 1-2 times per night
− Otherwise all negative
• Physical Examination
− Weight 117 pounds, Height 62”, BMI 21.4
− BP 120/74
− No significant findings. No dowager’s hump.
Please Break Into Work Groups
With your neighbor, turn
around and form a team
of 4 with the two
neighbors behind you
If you are not matched up
with a group, join a group
that is closest to you
Goal is groups of 3-4
0
4
0Minutes Seconds
Emily Small Group Discussion # 1
• Break into your groups
• Discuss your answers
• Record your answers on the
green sheet (your answers
help guide future education)
• Total time: 4 minutes
0
EMILY DISCUSSION # 1
What are Emily’s risk
factors for future
fracture?
______________________
______________________
What tests would you
order?
______________________
______________________
Further Patient Work-up
• DXA Results
− Lumbar spine T-score: -1.8
− Left total hip T-score: -1.1; left femoral neck T-score: -1.9
− Left 1/3 radius T-score: -1.4
− VFA T4-L4: normal
• FRAX 10 year risk of fracture: major: 19%; hip: 4.0%
• Lab Results
− CBC: normal
− CMP and phosphorus: normal
− 25-OH vitamin D: 22.4 ng/mL
− 24-hour urine calcium: 142.5 mg
− Creatinine: 0.76 mg/dL
Emily Small Group Discussion # 2
• Turn to part two of your
green sheet and discuss
your next steps
• Record your answers on
the green sheet (your
answers help guide future
education)
• Total time: 4 minutes
EMILY DISCUSSION # 2
Is Emily a candidate for
osteoporosis therapy?
Why or why
not?______________
__________________
If you need more
information to make a
recommendation, what
is it? _____________
0
4
0Minutes Seconds
0
Emily Discussion
Record Your Group Answers
DXA Results
− Lumbar spine T-score: -1.8
− Left total hip T-score: -1.1
− Left femoral neck T-score: -1.9
− Left 1/3 radius T-score: -1.4
− VFA T4-L4: normal
FRAX 10 year risk of fracture
− Major: 19%
− Hip: 4.0%
Lab Results
− CBC: normal
− CMP and
phosphorus: normal
− 25-OH vitamin D:
22.4 ng/mL
− 24-hour urine
calcium: normal
Group Review of Case
Emily’s risk factors
• Age
• Low body weight
• Personal history of low-trauma/fragility fracture
• Sedentary lifestyle
• Low calcium and vitamin D intake
• Vitamin D insufficiency
Evaluation for secondary causes
• Vitamin D insufficiency was discovered and addressed
• Calcium and vitamin D sufficiency are important for bone
health
VFA
• Proactive vertebral imaging is important and helps in risk stratification
• A vertebral compression fracture would have made her a candidate for
pharmacologic treatment regardless of bone density
FRAX
• Helpful in risk stratification
• Uses a combination of clinical risk factors and BMD to predict fracture risk
• Emily is at high risk of fracture and exceeds the threshold for recommended
treatment based on her FRAX risk and the NOF guidelines
Case resolution
• Should discuss vitamin D repletion, calcium intake, weight bearing/strength
exercises, fall risk reduction, etc
• Emily is certainly a candidate for pharmacologic treatment
Group Review of Case
Online Tools and Resources
• www.osteoCME.org
– Free online CME
– PQRSwizard®
• FRAX Tool
– www.shef.ac.uk/FRAX/
• AAFP guidelines
– Sweet MG, et al. Am
Fam Physician.
2009;79(3):193-200.
• www.nof.org
– Bone Health Basics
– Patient resources, support
– NOF Clinician’s Guide 2014
• ACP treatment guidelines
– Qaseem A, et al. Ann Intern Med.
2008;149(6):404-415.
• Fracture Liaison Services
– NBHA resource center: www.nbha.org
Please Leave Blue And Green Handouts
on your Chair or Hand to Meeting Staff
at the Door or Registration Desk
Please visit
www.OsteoCME.org
for more education
Resources
for you to
keep
Pretest
Case
Worksheet
Posttest
Evaluation
Keep the white page
(page 1)
For more education
and resources please
visit
www.osteoCME.org
Questions or
Comments?

More Related Content

Similar to 2-Osteoporosis-Track-2.pptx

Efficacy,and safety of intravenous zoledronic acid in treatment+of+pediatric+...
Efficacy,and safety of intravenous zoledronic acid in treatment+of+pediatric+...Efficacy,and safety of intravenous zoledronic acid in treatment+of+pediatric+...
Efficacy,and safety of intravenous zoledronic acid in treatment+of+pediatric+...
Abdulmoein AlAgha
 
After Starting Therapy
After Starting TherapyAfter Starting Therapy
After Starting Therapy
demiss
 
Osteoporosis new horizons
Osteoporosis new horizonsOsteoporosis new horizons
Osteoporosis new horizons
Shambhu N
 
Osteoporosis
OsteoporosisOsteoporosis
Osteoporosis
asamosh
 

Similar to 2-Osteoporosis-Track-2.pptx (20)

Osteoporosis
OsteoporosisOsteoporosis
Osteoporosis
 
Efficacy,and safety of intravenous zoledronic acid in treatment+of+pediatric+...
Efficacy,and safety of intravenous zoledronic acid in treatment+of+pediatric+...Efficacy,and safety of intravenous zoledronic acid in treatment+of+pediatric+...
Efficacy,and safety of intravenous zoledronic acid in treatment+of+pediatric+...
 
Osteoporosis
OsteoporosisOsteoporosis
Osteoporosis
 
Verslag ASBMR 2011, San Diego, deel 1
Verslag ASBMR 2011, San Diego, deel 1Verslag ASBMR 2011, San Diego, deel 1
Verslag ASBMR 2011, San Diego, deel 1
 
After Starting Therapy
After Starting TherapyAfter Starting Therapy
After Starting Therapy
 
Guidelines for the management of Osteoporosis.pdf
Guidelines for the management of Osteoporosis.pdfGuidelines for the management of Osteoporosis.pdf
Guidelines for the management of Osteoporosis.pdf
 
Diagnosi e trattamento dell'osteoporosi
Diagnosi e trattamento dell'osteoporosiDiagnosi e trattamento dell'osteoporosi
Diagnosi e trattamento dell'osteoporosi
 
Building a translational team for impacting public policy Pre-Congress Worksh...
Building a translational team for impacting public policyPre-Congress Worksh...Building a translational team for impacting public policyPre-Congress Worksh...
Building a translational team for impacting public policy Pre-Congress Worksh...
 
USPSTF osteoporosis, vit d
USPSTF osteoporosis, vit d USPSTF osteoporosis, vit d
USPSTF osteoporosis, vit d
 
Facts and figures about osteoporosis in rural india11
Facts and figures about osteoporosis in rural india11Facts and figures about osteoporosis in rural india11
Facts and figures about osteoporosis in rural india11
 
Osteoporosis new horizons
Osteoporosis new horizonsOsteoporosis new horizons
Osteoporosis new horizons
 
Rheumatology Highlights 2012
Rheumatology Highlights 2012Rheumatology Highlights 2012
Rheumatology Highlights 2012
 
Nof
NofNof
Nof
 
Update on the 18th International Conference on Co-morbidities and Adverse Dru...
Update on the 18th International Conference on Co-morbidities and Adverse Dru...Update on the 18th International Conference on Co-morbidities and Adverse Dru...
Update on the 18th International Conference on Co-morbidities and Adverse Dru...
 
Osteoprosis
OsteoprosisOsteoprosis
Osteoprosis
 
Osteoporosis in Elderly People.pptx
Osteoporosis in Elderly People.pptxOsteoporosis in Elderly People.pptx
Osteoporosis in Elderly People.pptx
 
osteoporosis how to prevent
 osteoporosis how to prevent osteoporosis how to prevent
osteoporosis how to prevent
 
Osteoporosis
OsteoporosisOsteoporosis
Osteoporosis
 
Osteoporosis
OsteoporosisOsteoporosis
Osteoporosis
 
Osteoporosis & Menopause.pptx
Osteoporosis & Menopause.pptxOsteoporosis & Menopause.pptx
Osteoporosis & Menopause.pptx
 

More from MsccMohamed

More from MsccMohamed (20)

color doppler
color dopplercolor doppler
color doppler
 
fetal doppler
fetal dopplerfetal doppler
fetal doppler
 
The Doppler Effect.ppt
The Doppler Effect.pptThe Doppler Effect.ppt
The Doppler Effect.ppt
 
case presentation guide.ppt
case presentation guide.pptcase presentation guide.ppt
case presentation guide.ppt
 
osteoporosis - E-Ageing
osteoporosis - E-Ageingosteoporosis - E-Ageing
osteoporosis - E-Ageing
 
Familial Hypocalciureic Hypercalcaemia (FHH)
Familial Hypocalciureic Hypercalcaemia (FHH)Familial Hypocalciureic Hypercalcaemia (FHH)
Familial Hypocalciureic Hypercalcaemia (FHH)
 
Musculo-Skeletal Physiotherapy II
Musculo-Skeletal Physiotherapy IIMusculo-Skeletal Physiotherapy II
Musculo-Skeletal Physiotherapy II
 
thyroid cancer
thyroid cancerthyroid cancer
thyroid cancer
 
acute renal failure.ppt
acute renal failure.pptacute renal failure.ppt
acute renal failure.ppt
 
synovial chondrosarcoma Case directory
synovial chondrosarcoma Case directorysynovial chondrosarcoma Case directory
synovial chondrosarcoma Case directory
 
The Many Faces of Hyperparathyroidism & Advances in Treatment
The Many Faces of Hyperparathyroidism & Advances in TreatmentThe Many Faces of Hyperparathyroidism & Advances in Treatment
The Many Faces of Hyperparathyroidism & Advances in Treatment
 
Calcium metabolism disorders
Calcium metabolism disordersCalcium metabolism disorders
Calcium metabolism disorders
 
Pathologic Fractures orthopedics trauma
Pathologic Fractures orthopedics traumaPathologic Fractures orthopedics trauma
Pathologic Fractures orthopedics trauma
 
Acute Oncology Presentations Caused by Disease
Acute Oncology Presentations Caused by DiseaseAcute Oncology Presentations Caused by Disease
Acute Oncology Presentations Caused by Disease
 
Giant Cell Lesions
Giant Cell LesionsGiant Cell Lesions
Giant Cell Lesions
 
Case Presentation of a Practical Problem in Family
Case Presentation of a Practical Problem in FamilyCase Presentation of a Practical Problem in Family
Case Presentation of a Practical Problem in Family
 
disorders-of-the-parathyroid-glands
disorders-of-the-parathyroid-glandsdisorders-of-the-parathyroid-glands
disorders-of-the-parathyroid-glands
 
hyperparathyroidism
hyperparathyroidismhyperparathyroidism
hyperparathyroidism
 
cervix brachytherapy 2
cervix brachytherapy 2cervix brachytherapy 2
cervix brachytherapy 2
 
Cervix_NCI_Gaffney.ppt
Cervix_NCI_Gaffney.pptCervix_NCI_Gaffney.ppt
Cervix_NCI_Gaffney.ppt
 

Recently uploaded

Obat Aborsi Ampuh Usia 1,2,3,4,5,6,7 Bulan 081901222272 Obat Penggugur Kandu...
Obat Aborsi Ampuh Usia 1,2,3,4,5,6,7 Bulan  081901222272 Obat Penggugur Kandu...Obat Aborsi Ampuh Usia 1,2,3,4,5,6,7 Bulan  081901222272 Obat Penggugur Kandu...
Obat Aborsi Ampuh Usia 1,2,3,4,5,6,7 Bulan 081901222272 Obat Penggugur Kandu...
Halo Docter
 
Difference Between Skeletal Smooth and Cardiac Muscles
Difference Between Skeletal Smooth and Cardiac MusclesDifference Between Skeletal Smooth and Cardiac Muscles
Difference Between Skeletal Smooth and Cardiac Muscles
MedicoseAcademics
 
Jual Obat Aborsi Di Dubai UAE Wa 0838-4800-7379 Obat Penggugur Kandungan Cytotec
Jual Obat Aborsi Di Dubai UAE Wa 0838-4800-7379 Obat Penggugur Kandungan CytotecJual Obat Aborsi Di Dubai UAE Wa 0838-4800-7379 Obat Penggugur Kandungan Cytotec
Jual Obat Aborsi Di Dubai UAE Wa 0838-4800-7379 Obat Penggugur Kandungan Cytotec
jualobat34
 
Physiologic Anatomy of Heart_AntiCopy.pdf
Physiologic Anatomy of Heart_AntiCopy.pdfPhysiologic Anatomy of Heart_AntiCopy.pdf
Physiologic Anatomy of Heart_AntiCopy.pdf
MedicoseAcademics
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Shazia Iqbal 2024 - Bioorganic Chemistry.pdf
Shazia Iqbal 2024 - Bioorganic Chemistry.pdfShazia Iqbal 2024 - Bioorganic Chemistry.pdf
Shazia Iqbal 2024 - Bioorganic Chemistry.pdf
 
Obat Aborsi Ampuh Usia 1,2,3,4,5,6,7 Bulan 081901222272 Obat Penggugur Kandu...
Obat Aborsi Ampuh Usia 1,2,3,4,5,6,7 Bulan  081901222272 Obat Penggugur Kandu...Obat Aborsi Ampuh Usia 1,2,3,4,5,6,7 Bulan  081901222272 Obat Penggugur Kandu...
Obat Aborsi Ampuh Usia 1,2,3,4,5,6,7 Bulan 081901222272 Obat Penggugur Kandu...
 
VIP ℂall Girls Arekere Bangalore 6378878445 WhatsApp: Me All Time Serviℂe Ava...
VIP ℂall Girls Arekere Bangalore 6378878445 WhatsApp: Me All Time Serviℂe Ava...VIP ℂall Girls Arekere Bangalore 6378878445 WhatsApp: Me All Time Serviℂe Ava...
VIP ℂall Girls Arekere Bangalore 6378878445 WhatsApp: Me All Time Serviℂe Ava...
 
MOTION MANAGEMANT IN LUNG SBRT BY DR KANHU CHARAN PATRO
MOTION MANAGEMANT IN LUNG SBRT BY DR KANHU CHARAN PATROMOTION MANAGEMANT IN LUNG SBRT BY DR KANHU CHARAN PATRO
MOTION MANAGEMANT IN LUNG SBRT BY DR KANHU CHARAN PATRO
 
See it and Catch it! Recognizing the Thought Traps that Negatively Impact How...
See it and Catch it! Recognizing the Thought Traps that Negatively Impact How...See it and Catch it! Recognizing the Thought Traps that Negatively Impact How...
See it and Catch it! Recognizing the Thought Traps that Negatively Impact How...
 
Top 10 Most Beautiful Chinese Pornstars List 2024
Top 10 Most Beautiful Chinese Pornstars List 2024Top 10 Most Beautiful Chinese Pornstars List 2024
Top 10 Most Beautiful Chinese Pornstars List 2024
 
7 steps How to prevent Thalassemia : Dr Sharda Jain & Vandana Gupta
7 steps How to prevent Thalassemia : Dr Sharda Jain & Vandana Gupta7 steps How to prevent Thalassemia : Dr Sharda Jain & Vandana Gupta
7 steps How to prevent Thalassemia : Dr Sharda Jain & Vandana Gupta
 
Dr. A Sumathi - LINEARITY CONCEPT OF SIGNIFICANCE.pdf
Dr. A Sumathi - LINEARITY CONCEPT OF SIGNIFICANCE.pdfDr. A Sumathi - LINEARITY CONCEPT OF SIGNIFICANCE.pdf
Dr. A Sumathi - LINEARITY CONCEPT OF SIGNIFICANCE.pdf
 
TEST BANK For Porth's Essentials of Pathophysiology, 5th Edition by Tommie L ...
TEST BANK For Porth's Essentials of Pathophysiology, 5th Edition by Tommie L ...TEST BANK For Porth's Essentials of Pathophysiology, 5th Edition by Tommie L ...
TEST BANK For Porth's Essentials of Pathophysiology, 5th Edition by Tommie L ...
 
Creeping Stroke - Venous thrombosis presenting with pc-stroke.pptx
Creeping Stroke - Venous thrombosis presenting with pc-stroke.pptxCreeping Stroke - Venous thrombosis presenting with pc-stroke.pptx
Creeping Stroke - Venous thrombosis presenting with pc-stroke.pptx
 
Circulatory Shock, types and stages, compensatory mechanisms
Circulatory Shock, types and stages, compensatory mechanismsCirculatory Shock, types and stages, compensatory mechanisms
Circulatory Shock, types and stages, compensatory mechanisms
 
VIP ℂall Girls Kothanur {{ Bangalore }} 6378878445 WhatsApp: Me 24/7 Hours Se...
VIP ℂall Girls Kothanur {{ Bangalore }} 6378878445 WhatsApp: Me 24/7 Hours Se...VIP ℂall Girls Kothanur {{ Bangalore }} 6378878445 WhatsApp: Me 24/7 Hours Se...
VIP ℂall Girls Kothanur {{ Bangalore }} 6378878445 WhatsApp: Me 24/7 Hours Se...
 
Difference Between Skeletal Smooth and Cardiac Muscles
Difference Between Skeletal Smooth and Cardiac MusclesDifference Between Skeletal Smooth and Cardiac Muscles
Difference Between Skeletal Smooth and Cardiac Muscles
 
TEST BANK For Guyton and Hall Textbook of Medical Physiology, 14th Edition by...
TEST BANK For Guyton and Hall Textbook of Medical Physiology, 14th Edition by...TEST BANK For Guyton and Hall Textbook of Medical Physiology, 14th Edition by...
TEST BANK For Guyton and Hall Textbook of Medical Physiology, 14th Edition by...
 
Jual Obat Aborsi Di Dubai UAE Wa 0838-4800-7379 Obat Penggugur Kandungan Cytotec
Jual Obat Aborsi Di Dubai UAE Wa 0838-4800-7379 Obat Penggugur Kandungan CytotecJual Obat Aborsi Di Dubai UAE Wa 0838-4800-7379 Obat Penggugur Kandungan Cytotec
Jual Obat Aborsi Di Dubai UAE Wa 0838-4800-7379 Obat Penggugur Kandungan Cytotec
 
Top 10 Most Beautiful Russian Pornstars List 2024
Top 10 Most Beautiful Russian Pornstars List 2024Top 10 Most Beautiful Russian Pornstars List 2024
Top 10 Most Beautiful Russian Pornstars List 2024
 
Part I - Anticipatory Grief: Experiencing grief before the loss has happened
Part I - Anticipatory Grief: Experiencing grief before the loss has happenedPart I - Anticipatory Grief: Experiencing grief before the loss has happened
Part I - Anticipatory Grief: Experiencing grief before the loss has happened
 
Face and Muscles of facial expression.pptx
Face and Muscles of facial expression.pptxFace and Muscles of facial expression.pptx
Face and Muscles of facial expression.pptx
 
HISTORY, CONCEPT AND ITS IMPORTANCE IN DRUG DEVELOPMENT.pptx
HISTORY, CONCEPT AND ITS IMPORTANCE IN DRUG DEVELOPMENT.pptxHISTORY, CONCEPT AND ITS IMPORTANCE IN DRUG DEVELOPMENT.pptx
HISTORY, CONCEPT AND ITS IMPORTANCE IN DRUG DEVELOPMENT.pptx
 
Physiologic Anatomy of Heart_AntiCopy.pdf
Physiologic Anatomy of Heart_AntiCopy.pdfPhysiologic Anatomy of Heart_AntiCopy.pdf
Physiologic Anatomy of Heart_AntiCopy.pdf
 

2-Osteoporosis-Track-2.pptx

  • 1. Michael J. Econs, M.D. Professor of Medicine Indiana University School of Medicine Indianapolis, IN 46202 Update on Management of Osteoporosis
  • 2. Faculty Disclosure It is the policy of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR) and The France Foundation to ensure balance, independence, objectivity, and scientific rigor in all its sponsored educational activities. All faculty participating in this activity will disclose to the participants any significant financial interest or other relationship with manufacturer(s) of any commercial product(s)/device(s) and/or provider(s) of commercial services included in this educational activity. The intent of this disclosure is not to prevent a faculty member with a relevant financial or other relationship from participating in the activity, but rather to provide participants with information on which they can base their own judgments. The American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR) and The France Foundation have identified and resolved any and all faculty conflicts of interest prior to the release of this activity. This activity is supported by an educational grant from Amgen Inc.
  • 3. Learning Objectives • Improve the ability to assess risk factors for osteoporosis and apply evidence-based screening recommendations to these at-risk patients within one’s practice • Develop strategies to improve the treatment of patients with osteoporosis • Utilize the tools and other information in this initiative, including patient education tools and systems-based approaches, to facilitate improving the assessment and care being provided to patients with osteoporosis
  • 4. Agenda 20 minutes Slide lecture 20 minutes Case exercise in small groups 10 minutes Discussion Resources for you to keep Pretest Case Worksheet Posttest Evaluation Tear off now to take home Please complete the quick pretest NOW For the small group exercise later Complete these when the activity is over When we’re done, leave on your seat or pass to staff Activity Packets Everyone should have a packet
  • 5. Primary Care Providers Are Critical for Osteoporosis Management Screening, Diagnosis, and Treatment Osteoporosis is under-recognized Fractures are not recognized as sentinel events Osteoporosis is under-treated American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR) and The France Foundation 2013 2014 Education for PCPs Live Meetings and Online CME (free) www.osteoCME.org
  • 6. 2000 NIH Consensus Development Conference Definition of Osteoporosis Normal Bone Osteoporotic Bone • A skeletal disorder characterized by – Compromised bone strength predisposing to – An increased risk of fracture • Bone strength reflects the integration of two main features: – Bone density – Bone quality
  • 7. Osteoporosis Is a Serious Public Health Problem • Affects 10.2 million Americans (80% women) • 2 million fractures yearly • Direct cost $17 billion Distribution of Fractures
  • 8. Osteoporosis in Perspective 53 M 36 M 48 M 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Low Bone Mass +/or Osteoporosis Uncontrolled HT Uncontrolled LDL Americans with Risk Factors, in Millions
  • 9. Identified Treatment Gap NCQA HEDIS HEDIS Measure % Compliance* Beta-blocker persistence after a heart attack 88.5% Breast cancer screening 67.5% Colorectal cancer screening 58.4% Osteoporosis management for women after a fracture 25.0% NCQA The State of Health Care Quality 2013. https://www.ncqa.org/ReportCards/HealthPlans/StateofHealthCareQuality.aspx. Accessed August 2014. *2012 Medicare Rates
  • 10. Patient Care Goals • Identify patients at risk of fractures • Reduce incidence of fractures • Maintain quality of life – Activity – Independence – Health
  • 11. National Osteoporosis Foundation 2014 Guidelines • Universal (risk, diet, vitamin D, exercise, smoking, monitoring) • Diagnosis (BMD, vertebral imaging, causes of secondary osteoporosis) • Monitoring (BMD) • Treatment (initiation criteria, options, duration) Major clinical recommendations http://www. http://nof.org/hcp/resources/913. Accessed August 2014.
  • 12. 2014 Universal Recommendations http://www.nof.org/hcp/practice/tools. Accessed August 2014. Counsel on the risk of fractures Eat a diet rich in fruits and vegetables (supplemented if necessary) to a total calcium intake of • 1000 mg per day for men 50-70 • 1200 mg per day for women ≥ 51 • 1200 mg per day for men ≥ 71 Vitamin D intake should be 800-1000 IU per day (age ≥50), supplemented if necessary Regular weight-bearing and muscle-strengthening exercise Fall prevention evaluation and training Cessation of tobacco use and avoidance of excessive alcohol intake
  • 13. Who Should Have a Bone Density Test? AAFP and NOF AAFP: Sweet MG, et al. Am Fam Physician. 2009;79(3):193-200. NOF: National Osteoporosis Foundation. Clinician’s Guide to Prevention and Treatment of Osteoporosis. www.nof.org. Accessed August 2014. Women age 65 and older Men age 70 and older Postmenopausal women and men ages 50–69 with clinical risk factors Adults who have a fracture after age 50 Adults with a condition (e.g., rheumatoid arthritis) or taking a medication (e.g., glucocorticoids) associated with low bone mass or bone loss
  • 14. WHO Criteria for Postmenopausal Osteoporosis The T-score compares an individual’s BMD with the mean value for young adults and expresses the difference as a standard deviation score Category T-score Normal -1.0 and above Low bone mass (osteopenia) -1.0 to -2.5 Osteoporosis -2.5 and below http://www.who.int/chp/topics/Osteoporosis.pdf. Accessed August 2014. WHO Study Group. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser. 1994;843:1-129.
  • 16.
  • 17. Benefits of FRAX Derives 10-year probability of clinical event from measurable parameters Internationally recognized and validated Based on data from multiple cohorts Easily accessible on the Internet or DXA software Helps identify patients who need treatment Can be used to reassure low-risk patients Not valid to monitor patients on treatment Only femoral neck BMD is considered Risk is “yes/no” – there is no consideration of “dose” (e.g., fractures, glucocorticoids, smoking, alcohol) Not all risk factors are included (eg, risk of falling) Clinical judgment is required Do patients with high FRAX scores benefit from medication? (Unknown) Limitations of FRAX Watts NB, et al. J Bone Miner Res 2009;24:975-979.
  • 18. Whom to Treat: NOF Guidelines 2014 Women ≥ 65 and men ≥ 70 (younger with risk factors) T-score between -1.0 and -2.5 T-score ≤ -2.5 in the lumbar spine, total hip, or femoral neck or Hip or spine fracture (clinical or radiographic) DXA test ≥ 3% for hip fracture or ≥ 20% for major osteoporotic fractures FRAX 10-y fracture risk Candidate for TREATMENT YES YES nof.org/hcp/resources/913. Accessed August 2014.
  • 19. FDA-approved Medications Osteoporosis Post- menopausal Glucocorticoid- induced Male Drug Prevent Treat Prevent Treat Estrogen  Calcitonin* (Miacalcin®, Fortical®)  Raloxifene (Evista®)   Ibandronate (Boniva®)   Alendronate (Fosamax®)     Risedronate (Actonel®)      Risedronate (Atelvia®)  Zoledronate (Reclast®)      Denosumab (Prolia™)   Teriparatide (Forteo®)    Diab DL, Watts NB. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 2013;42(2):305-317.
  • 20. Drug Vertebral Fracture Nonvertebral Fracture Hip Fracture Calcitonin  Raloxifene  Ibandronate  Alendronate    Risedronate    Zoledronic acid    Denosumab    Teriparatide   Evidence for Fracture Reduction Diab DL, Watts NB. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 2013;42(2):305-317.
  • 21. Choosing an Antiresorptive Agent Efficacy “broad spectrum” antifracture efficacy (alendronate, risedronate, zoledronate, denosumab) Route of administration oral (fasting or with food) or parenteral Frequency of administration daily, weekly, monthly, quarterly, twice yearly, once yearly Side effects/tolerability depends on agent and patient Non-skeletal effects breast cancer reduction (raloxifene) Cost/insurance coverage generic oral; drugs “administered by health professional” covered by Medicare Part B
  • 22. Factors That May Reduce Adherence Etiology Possible Factors Patient-related • Lack of understanding of condition or potential treatment benefits • Patient motivation for treatment • Comorbid conditions • Cognitive dysfunction/forgetfulness • No fracture history or symptoms • Dissatisfactions with healthcare professional interaction Medication-related • Cost • Dosing regimen/frequency • Side effects • Safety misconceptions
  • 23. • Monitor treatment with DXA every 1–2 years – Do not "over-interpret" change – Be happy when BMD is stable OR increasing • Why do some patients lose BMD on treatment? – Adherence – Drug pharmacokinetics – Underlying disorders that need to be addressed • Patients on treatment whose BMD remains low are at high risk of fracture and may benefit from longer treatment Monitoring
  • 24. Secondary Fracture Prevention • A fracture is a sentinel event • A fracture in a person over 50 is the most powerful risk factor for a future fracture • Many high risk patients have their fractures successfully treated but do NOT receive assessment and treatment to prevent the next fracture • Fracture Liaison Service (FLS) is an emerging model for secondary prevention
  • 25. Fracture Liaison Services • FLS coordinator orchestrates care following a minimal trauma fracture • Several models in use internationally • Positive impact – Increased BMD testing rates – Therapy initiation rates • Insufficient data – Cost-effectiveness – Secondary fracture reduction Ganda K, et al. Osteoporos Int. 2013;24(2):393-406. Dehamchia-Rehailia N, et al. Osteoporos Int. 2014;25(10):2409-2416.
  • 26. Management Rates After Fracture Women Men DXA 19.0% 10.2% Treatment 18.6% 9.6% • Retrospective cohort study • 2000-2009 • 88,571 women; 41,984 men • Management within 1 year of frailty fracture: Balasubramanian A, et al.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014;96(7):e52.
  • 27. Treatment Rates Are Decreasing Patients Initiating Treatment Within 1 Year of Fracture (%) Balasubramanian A, et al.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014;96(7):e52. Year Women Men
  • 28. Evaluation and Treatment for Osteoporosis: Not Just One Quick Visit Initial Evaluation Order DXA Assess Fx Risk If Fx Risk is Low, discuss calcium & Vit D, Stop for Now Reevaluate Later If Fx Risk is Borderline or High, Schedule Second Visit Second Visit Review DXA/Fx Risk Discuss Calcium and Vitamin D Order Labs if Needed Discuss Rx Options Schedule Third Visit Third Visit Review Labs, Act if Needed Select Rx Schedule Follow Up • CBC • Calcium, kidney tests, liver tests, and phosphorus • 25-OH vitamin D • 24 hour urine calcium • Testosterone (in men)
  • 29. Where Are We Now? Improved awareness Excellent diagnostic tools available FRAX is a quantitative risk assessment Safe and effective individualized treatment Better understanding of pathogenesis Federal initiatives to improve care The Good News Under-recognition of patients at risk for fracture Decreasing access to DXA Poor patient understanding of risk/benefit Increasing patient concerns about side effects Fewer patients on therapy Poor adherence • 30% of patients don’t pick up new bisphosphonate prescriptions • Risk of fracture increased 30–40% Ross S, et al. Value Health. 2011;14(4):571-581. Reynolds K, et al. Osteoporos Int. 2013; 24(9):2509-2517. The Bad News
  • 30. What Can I Do as a PCP? Practical Steps Patient Dialog • Risk/benefit discussion • Shared decision making Decision Aids • Electronic records • Checklist for risk • Handouts/ Web sites Engage the Care Team • Counseling, follow-up • ID high-risk patients Manage Nonadherence • Identify individual barriers • Address barriers
  • 31. Summary What is osteoporosis? Decreased bone strength predisposing to an increased risk of fracture Why should you care? Common, significant cost, morbidity and mortality Whom to test and how? DXA for all women by age 65, higher risk women earlier; FRAX is a useful tool Whom to treat and how? Individuals at high risk of fracture; approved agents are safe and effective; treatment decisions must be individualized
  • 32. Case Workshop: Small Group Exercise Everyone should have a packet We’re going to use the green sheet for this exercise. 1. I will present part of a case 2. Your small group will have 4 minutes to discuss it 3. After 4 minutes, I’ll present the next part of the case 4. You will have 4 minutes to discuss next steps 5. Finally, we will review the case for 10 minutes Resources for you to keep Pretest Case Worksheet Posttest Evaluation
  • 33. Patient Presentation: “Emily” • 73-year-old Caucasian woman • Recent wrist fracture – fell in parking lot due to uneven surface Emily: Patient History 1 • Medical − Hypertension − Menopause at age 48, treated with estrogen until age 61 − No prior fracture • Family − No history of osteoporosis or fracture
  • 34. Emily: Patient History 2 • Social − Married − Tobacco: 20 pack year history; quit 1985 − Alcohol: 2 glasses of wine per week − Caffeine: Coffee and tea, each 2 cups per day − Calcium/Vitamin D: yogurt 1 serving/day, greens regularly − Exercise: none regularly • Medications − Multivitamin daily containing 400 mg calcium and 400 IU vitamin D − Lisinopril: 10 mg daily
  • 35. Other Data • Review of systems − No prior falls, no balance issues − Nocturia 1-2 times per night − Otherwise all negative • Physical Examination − Weight 117 pounds, Height 62”, BMI 21.4 − BP 120/74 − No significant findings. No dowager’s hump.
  • 36. Please Break Into Work Groups With your neighbor, turn around and form a team of 4 with the two neighbors behind you If you are not matched up with a group, join a group that is closest to you Goal is groups of 3-4
  • 37. 0 4 0Minutes Seconds Emily Small Group Discussion # 1 • Break into your groups • Discuss your answers • Record your answers on the green sheet (your answers help guide future education) • Total time: 4 minutes 0 EMILY DISCUSSION # 1 What are Emily’s risk factors for future fracture? ______________________ ______________________ What tests would you order? ______________________ ______________________
  • 38. Further Patient Work-up • DXA Results − Lumbar spine T-score: -1.8 − Left total hip T-score: -1.1; left femoral neck T-score: -1.9 − Left 1/3 radius T-score: -1.4 − VFA T4-L4: normal • FRAX 10 year risk of fracture: major: 19%; hip: 4.0% • Lab Results − CBC: normal − CMP and phosphorus: normal − 25-OH vitamin D: 22.4 ng/mL − 24-hour urine calcium: 142.5 mg − Creatinine: 0.76 mg/dL
  • 39. Emily Small Group Discussion # 2 • Turn to part two of your green sheet and discuss your next steps • Record your answers on the green sheet (your answers help guide future education) • Total time: 4 minutes EMILY DISCUSSION # 2 Is Emily a candidate for osteoporosis therapy? Why or why not?______________ __________________ If you need more information to make a recommendation, what is it? _____________
  • 40. 0 4 0Minutes Seconds 0 Emily Discussion Record Your Group Answers DXA Results − Lumbar spine T-score: -1.8 − Left total hip T-score: -1.1 − Left femoral neck T-score: -1.9 − Left 1/3 radius T-score: -1.4 − VFA T4-L4: normal FRAX 10 year risk of fracture − Major: 19% − Hip: 4.0% Lab Results − CBC: normal − CMP and phosphorus: normal − 25-OH vitamin D: 22.4 ng/mL − 24-hour urine calcium: normal
  • 41. Group Review of Case Emily’s risk factors • Age • Low body weight • Personal history of low-trauma/fragility fracture • Sedentary lifestyle • Low calcium and vitamin D intake • Vitamin D insufficiency Evaluation for secondary causes • Vitamin D insufficiency was discovered and addressed • Calcium and vitamin D sufficiency are important for bone health
  • 42. VFA • Proactive vertebral imaging is important and helps in risk stratification • A vertebral compression fracture would have made her a candidate for pharmacologic treatment regardless of bone density FRAX • Helpful in risk stratification • Uses a combination of clinical risk factors and BMD to predict fracture risk • Emily is at high risk of fracture and exceeds the threshold for recommended treatment based on her FRAX risk and the NOF guidelines Case resolution • Should discuss vitamin D repletion, calcium intake, weight bearing/strength exercises, fall risk reduction, etc • Emily is certainly a candidate for pharmacologic treatment Group Review of Case
  • 43. Online Tools and Resources • www.osteoCME.org – Free online CME – PQRSwizard® • FRAX Tool – www.shef.ac.uk/FRAX/ • AAFP guidelines – Sweet MG, et al. Am Fam Physician. 2009;79(3):193-200. • www.nof.org – Bone Health Basics – Patient resources, support – NOF Clinician’s Guide 2014 • ACP treatment guidelines – Qaseem A, et al. Ann Intern Med. 2008;149(6):404-415. • Fracture Liaison Services – NBHA resource center: www.nbha.org
  • 44. Please Leave Blue And Green Handouts on your Chair or Hand to Meeting Staff at the Door or Registration Desk Please visit www.OsteoCME.org for more education Resources for you to keep Pretest Case Worksheet Posttest Evaluation Keep the white page (page 1)
  • 45. For more education and resources please visit www.osteoCME.org Questions or Comments?