SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 18
Download to read offline
Residency Determination Service
Data Analysis for the
NC Association of
Community College Presidents
Presentation
June 13, 2018
2
6.8.18
Key Definitions and Assumptions:
• This analysis includes all students requesting an Initial Consideration between January 1, 2017 and
January 1, 2018 whether applying to a North Carolina Community College (NCCCS), University of North
Carolina institution (UNC), or North Carolina private or independent college or university (NCICU).
• This analysis is based on a student’s Initial Consideration (first experience) through RDS. A student’s final
classification is not reflected in this report. Therefore, those students who initially received a non-
resident classification may have subsequently received a resident classification through a
Reconsideration or Appeal.
• Geographic region, age, gender, and student experience data were based on 289,142 students who
started an Online Interview.
• RDS does not ask a student to provide their race or ethnicity when completing a request for
classification therefore, ethnicity and race data was pulled from 125,448 NCCCS admission applications.
• Resident: Students classified as Resident completed the RDS Online Interview as presented to them and
received a Resident classification or qualified for the Active Duty Military benefit.
• Non-Resident: Students classified as Non-Resident included students who completed the RDS Online
Interview as presented to them and received a Non-Resident classification, and students who confirmed
they did not want to be considered for residency. NCCCS campuses require a student to complete RDS
even if they live outside of North Carolina and/or do not want to be considered for residency.
• Did Not Finish: Students classified as Did Not Finish (DNF) are students who began the Interview,
stopped at some point during the Interview, and never returned to finish.
3
6.8.18
The questions outlined in this document are the questions posed to the North Carolina State Education
Assistance Authority (NCSEAA) in the February 15, 2018 NCACCP Request for Data Analysis Memorandum.
1. What are the most common questions where people stop during the Interview (and do not return to
finish)?
RDS analyzed the user experience for 289,142 students who received classifications of Resident, Non-Resident,
and those who Did Not Finish (DNF) the RDS Online Interview between January 1, 2017 and January 1, 2018. Of
the 289,142 students, 6.31% of students Did Not Finish the RDS Online Interview.
RDS identified where each age group of students most commonly stopped in the Interview and therefore, did
not receive a classification. Student age was divided into three ranges: under 18, 18-23, and 24 and older. These
age ranges were used since the RDS Online Interview presents different questions to students depending on
these age ranges when completing the Interview.
The detailed breakdown for each age group is listed in Appendix B and reflects the top 10 questions on which
students stopped during the Online Interview and did not return. The top ten questions were not the same for
each age group; however, there were seven common stopping points across all three age groups. Three of the
seven common stopping points occur before a student is presented with specific domiciliary questions related to
tax, vehicle or employment information.
Table # 1
4
6.8.18
As noted in the table above, the largest percentage of students stopped when presented with dependency
status questions. Dependency status questions are similar across all age groups although students under age 18
have a few additional questions specific to their circumstances.
Dependency Questions - Under Age 18
• Are you a court appointed emancipated minor?
• Are you a ward of the state?
• Does someone other than your parent have legal guardianship of you?
• Are you married?
• Are one or both of your parents living?
• Do your parents provide 50% or more of your total cost of living? Total cost of living means the cost of
your food, clothing, shelter, transportation, school or college tuition, and other incidental costs of living
added together.
Dependency Questions – Ages 18-23
• Are you now, or have you ever been, a Ward of the State? If you were a Ward of the State but have
been adopted, select no.
• Are you married?
• Are one or both of your parents living?
• Do your parents provide 50% or more of your total cost of living? Total cost of living means the cost of
your food, clothing, shelter, transportation, school or college tuition, and other incidental costs of living
added together.
Dependency Questions – Ages 24+
• Are you married?
• Are one or both of your parents living?
• Do your parents provide 50% or more of your total cost of living? Total cost of living means the cost of
your food, clothing, shelter, transportation, school or college tuition, and other incidental costs of living
added together.
Also considered were the questions where most students (by volume) ended their RDS Online Interview. It is
important to note that some of the questions do not impact certain age groups. For example, any questions
regarding financial self-sufficiency are never asked of students ages 24 and older who are considered to be
independent.
The questions in the table (2) are listed as they are presented to the student. The data is summarized into three
defined sections where students end their Interview and do not return. Section 1 identifies that 48.62% of
students never complete the initial questions (1-3 in table) in the Online Interview. Section 2 indicates that
25.89% (4-7 in table) stop at some point during the domiciliary specific questions for either themselves or their
parents. Lastly, Section 3 indicates that 15.95% (8-10 in table) stop at some point after claiming to be financially
self-sufficient.
5
6.8.18
Table # 2
# Student stopped (DNF) – no return at these question(s): Count Percentage Section %
1 Do you claim to be a North Carolina resident? (first question) 874 5.18%
Section 1
48.62 %
2 Military involvement 534 3.17%
3 Dependency status 6,788 40.27%
4 Tax information 813 4.82%
Section 2
25.89%
5 Vehicle registration 2,202 13.06%
6 Driver’s license or State ID 840 4.98%
7 Employment 511 3.03%
8 # dependents in household (financial self-sufficiency question) 423 2.51%
Section 3
15.95%
9 Income (financial self-sufficiency) 1,261 7.48%
10 Unable to prove financial self-sufficiency; chose not to continue 1,004 5.96%
Total: 15,250 90.46%
2. What are the demographics of people who do not complete the Interview?
RDS reviewed age, gender, ethnicity, race and geographic region for students who Did Not Finish the RDS Online
Interview. Of the 6.31% who Did Not Finish the Interview, the majority of students were between the ages of 18
and 23 and female.
Table # 3
6.31% 4.77% 8.40% 4.65%
81.57% 86.35% 76.13% 77.66%
12.12% 8.88% 15.47% 17.69%
TOTAL < 18 (41,663) 18-23 (134,929) 24+ (112,550)
CLASSIFICATION AND DID NOT FINISH BY AGE
ALL STUDENTS (289,142)
Did Not Finish Resident Non-Resident
6
6.8.18
Of the age 18-23 students who Did Not Finish RDS (11,073), 47.35% (5,245) ended their Interview before they
were presented with domiciliary specific questions, 20.98% (2,325) ended their Interview when asked
domiciliary specific questions, and 20.92% (2,648) ended their Interview when asked about income during
financial self-sufficiency.
Table # 4
The second demographic considered when analyzing students who Did Not Finish the RDS Online Interview was
gender. Gender showed minimal difference in terms of students who started the RDS Online Interview and did
not return.
Table # 5
Residents, 81.57%
Non-Residents, 12.12%
2,057 (11.28%)11,073 (60.70%)
5,113 (28.03%)
Did Not Finish,
6.31%
DID NOT FINISH DETAIL BY AGE GROUP
ALL STUDENTS (289,142)
DNF (<18) DNF (18-23) DNF (24+)
39.03%
60.97%
37.95%
62.05%
MALE FEMALE
STUDENTS WHO DID NOT FINISH (DNF)
BY GENDER (18,243 STUDENTS)
Total (289,142) Did Not Finish (18,243)
7
6.8.18
A third demographic considered was race and ethnicity for students who did not complete RDS. This set of data
is the only data in this document which is NCCCS specific. RDS does not ask a student to provide their race or
ethnicity when completing a request for classification therefore, ethnicity and race data was pulled from
125,448 NCCCS admission applications.
The total number of students who Did Not Finish RDS is 18,243. The total number of NCCCS admission
applications started by students who Did Not Finish RDS is 5,206. If a student submitted more than one
admission application, the student is included more than once in the count. The race listed as Multiple
recognizes students who identified with more than one race on their admission application(s).
Table # 6
Race Did Not Finish RDS % Did Not Finish
White 1,996 38.34%
Black or African American 1,781 34.21%
Did Not Specify 1,010 19.40%
Multiple 254 4.88%
Asian 84 1.61%
American Indian or Alaska Native 74 1.42%
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander 7 0.13%
Total: 5,206 4.16%
The NCCCS admission applications request ethnicity data only on Hispanic or Latino students. The question
posed is “Are you Hispanic or Latino?” Students have the option to not answer, indicate “yes” or indicate “no”.
No additional ethnicities are listed on the admission application for students to identify. Of the 125,448
admission applications, 10,787 applications identified with Hispanic or Latino ethnicity, 29,381 applications did
not specify, and 85,280 applications identified as Not Hispanic or Latino.
The total admission applications with students who identified as Hispanic or Latino (10,787) and Did Not Finish
RDS was 589 which amounted to 0.47% of all admission applications cross referenced with RDS and 5.46% of
those who identified as Hispanic or Latino.
8
6.8.18
The final demographic considered for students who Did Not Finish the RDS Online Interview was geographic
location. Students not finishing RDS varied across the State. For this analysis, the zip code the student provided
to RDS was organized by North Carolina county. There were five counties with 10% or higher non-completion
rates. These counties were Gates, Yancey, Swain, Pamlico, and Columbus. All but one of these counties had less
than 250 total students and less than 35 students not finishing RDS. Columbus County was an exception to this
rule with 117 students not finishing RDS Online Interview out of 1,143 total students.
A detailed listing of each North Carolina zip code and related classifications is included in Appendix A.
3. Based on the research from questions 1 and 2, what actions will be taken to simplify the questions or help
people answer the questions?
The primary stopping point evident in this data analysis is students leaving the RDS Online Interview when
presented with the dependency status questions. The dependency questions are different based on age, but this
stopping point was number one across all age groups. Recent feedback in student focus groups also identified
this area as a point of confusion. RDS will consider ways to allow students to better identify their unique
situation and continue in the Interview in a more directed manner.
The second primary stopping point evident in this data analysis is students leaving the RDS Online Interview
when presented with vehicle registration questions. RDS will research further why students are leaving this
section of questions and consider possibilities for reducing this percentage.
The Higher Education Collaborative Advisory Committee (HECAC) recently made a policy decision to allow
students who are married or have a dependent, regardless of age, to be considered as independents when
completing RDS. Across all age groups, 15.95% of students left their Interview at some point when completing
financial self-sufficiency questions. RDS will implementing this functionality in early summer.
9
6.8.18
4. Of those who are classified as in-state residents, what are the most common data points?
RDS identified, by age group, where students who received a Resident classification most commonly completed
the Online Interview as Resident. The questions were reviewed by age group since the RDS Online Interview
presents different questions to students depending on their age when they complete the Interview. Once the
most common data points within each age group were identified, these data points were compared across all
three age groups. Twelve common points emerged across all three age groups of the 289,142 total students. The
common data points in the chart are listed as they are presented to the student.
Table # 7
# Top Common Data Points for Residents Count Percentage
Cumulative
Percentage
1 Student identified self or parent as military 7,198 3.05%
2 Resident after vehicle registration (parent and independent) 187,719 79.63% 82.68%
3 Resident after driver’s license or State ID (parent and independent) 3,320 1.41% 84.09%
4 Resident after voter registration (parent and independent) 20,718 8.78% 92.87%
5 Resident after employment (parent and independent) 3,122 1.32% 94.19%
6 Resident after high school (parent and independent) 5,347 2.27% 96.46%
7 Resident after tax (for student as a dependent) 408 0.17% 96.63%
8 Resident after vehicle registration (for student as a dependent) 384 0.16% 96.79%
9
Resident after driver’s license or State ID (for student as a
dependent) 923 0.39% 97.19%
10 Resident after voter registration (for student as a dependent) 268 0.11% 97.29%
11 Resident after employment (for student as a dependent) 64 .03% 97.32%
12
Resident after student identified family as receiving social service
benefits (parent and independent) 5,722 2.43% 99.76%
Total: 235,293
There was minimal difference across the age groups in terms of residency classification. A total of 261 students
under age 18 identified as wards of the state. This was the only difference across all three age groups.
10
6.8.18
5. Of those who are classified as out-of-state residents, what are the most common data points?
The same methodology for the Residency classification analysis was followed for the Non-Resident analysis. RDS
identified by age group the points where students who received a Non-Resident classification most commonly
completed the Online Interview. Once the most common data points within each age group were identified,
these data points were compared across all three age groups. There were 10 common data points which
emerged across all three age groups. The common data points in the chart are listed as they are presented to
the student.
Table # 8
# Top Completion Points for Non-Residents Count Percentage
Total %
Complete
1 Non-Resident after selecting no to claiming residency (first question) 1,050 3.00% 3.00%
2 Non-Resident after not meeting the Active Duty Military benefit 669 1.91%
45.58%
3 Non-Resident due to ineligible non-US citizen status 2,997 8.55%
4
Non-Resident after being unable to prove financial self-sufficiency and
choosing to end the Online Interview 2,810 8.02%
5
Non-Resident after not providing information on parent (such as a
unique identifier) 3,228 9.21%
6 Non-Resident due to duration 4,627 13.21%
7 Non-Resident after confirming filed NC taxes as a Non-Resident 1,641 4.68%
8 Non-Resident after completing social services questions 9,270 26.46%
49.88%9 Non-Resident after identifying they had no additional parent 5,343 15.25%
10 Non-Resident after completing veteran questions 2,864 8.17%
Total: 34,499 98.46%
Unlike students with Resident classifications, students with Non-Resident classifications showed slight
differences across age groups and sectors. Students under age 18 and age 24 and older tended to complete the
full Interview before receiving a Non-Resident classification while students ages 18-23 received Non-Resident
classifications at the end of the Interview but also when not meeting the financial self-sufficiency threshold (70%
of federal poverty guidelines). Students age 24 and older had a larger percentage of students not meeting the
12-month duration requirement (19.84%) compared to students under age 18 (5.92%) and students ages 18-23
(8.06%).
11
6.8.18
6. Based on the research in questions 4 and 5, what questions can be eliminated from the Interview?
Since going live in December 2016, steps have been taken at both a policy and operational level to make the
Online Interview as user friendly as possible while staying within the guidelines of residency law. To date, RDS
has completed 22 releases to simplify and improve the RDS Online Interview experience. Some of the
enhancements include:
• Establishing policy to permit students over the age of 24 to be considered independent for completing
the Online Interview (May, 12, 2017)
• Removing the questions allowing students to identify with the “Five Year” residency rule and providing
them with an immediate classification (July 17, 2017)
• Removing detailed questions within the voting, vehicle, and marriage information sections. (May 4, 2017
and August 22, 2017)
• Add the ability for student to go directly from RDS back to their open CFNC admission application(s).
(August 2, 2017)
• Adding back buttons to various screens within the dependency section allowing a student to determine
which responses best address his or her personal situation (March 6, 2018)
• Added the Student Help Line on each page of the Online Interview (April 26, 2018)
• Modifying questions for clarity and adding or modifying help text (multiple releases)
Upcoming enhancements to be made include:
• The Higher Education Collaborative Advisory Committee (HECAC) recently made a policy decision to
allow students who are married or have a dependent, regardless of age, to be considered as
independents when completing RDS. RDS will modify the Online Interview to remove the financial self-
sufficiency questions for students in this demographic. This enhancement will be implemented in early
summer.
• Modifying the student status page(s) to notify a student of why they received a non-resident
determination.
• Providing students a historical record of their residency requests with RDS.
For the remainder of 2018, RDS will continue to enhance the Online Interview based upon feedback from
students, campuses and counselors, processing trends, and additional data analysis. HECAC will revisit this
analysis in early 2019 to evaluate the impact of the interim modifications with all undergraduate campuses
having participated for a full year.
12
6.8.18
Appendix A
Appendix A represents all students who started RDS between January 1, 2017 and January 1, 2018. This includes
students who may be applying to a NCCCS campus, UNC campus, or NCICU campus (for financial aid) within or
without of their county.
County
Resident Non-Resident Did Not Finish Total
UsersCount % Count % Count %
Alamance 4,432 74.93% 1,069 18.07% 414 7.00% 5,915
Alexander 505 82.79% 63 10.33% 42 6.89% 610
Alleghany 114 77.03% 25 16.89% 9 6.08% 148
Anson 338 75.45% 83 18.53% 27 6.03% 448
Ashe 319 80.56% 56 14.14% 21 5.30% 396
Avery 229 80.63% 40 14.08% 15 5.28% 284
Beaufort 831 76.45% 181 16.65% 75 6.90% 1,087
Bertie 355 72.75% 107 21.93% 26 5.33% 488
Bladen 697 69.84% 210 21.04% 91 9.12% 998
Brunswick 1,715 71.85% 501 20.99% 170 7.12% 2,387
Buncombe 3,889 75.96% 907 17.71% 324 6.33% 5,120
Burke 1,268 79.10% 202 12.60% 133 8.30% 1,603
Cabarrus 5,428 76.96% 1,217 17.26% 408 5.78% 7,053
Caldwell 1,102 79.00% 189 13.55% 104 7.46% 1,395
Camden 167 78.40% 31 14.55% 15 7.04% 213
Carteret 859 77.60% 184 16.62% 64 5.78% 1,107
Caswell 211 72.26% 60 20.55% 21 7.19% 292
Catawba 2,643 79.92% 443 13.40% 221 6.68% 3,307
Chatham 793 77.44% 160 15.63% 71 6.93% 1,024
Cherokee 318 75.89% 77 18.38% 24 5.73% 419
Chowan 215 71.67% 62 20.67% 23 7.67% 300
Clay 111 80.43% 23 16.67% 4 2.90% 138
Cleveland 1,696 79.40% 307 14.37% 133 6.23% 2,136
Columbus 815 71.30% 211 18.46% 117 10.24% 1,143
Craven 1,870 72.23% 558 21.55% 161 6.22% 2,589
Cumberland 7,206 67.79% 2,808 26.42% 616 5.79% 10,630
Currituck 291 75.39% 60 15.54% 35 9.07% 386
Dare 501 76.37% 118 17.99% 37 5.64% 656
Davidson 3,149 75.77% 728 17.52% 279 6.71% 4,156
Davie 973 80.21% 147 12.12% 93 7.67% 1,213
Duplin 925 72.66% 255 20.03% 93 7.31% 1,273
Durham 6,342 72.14% 1,894 21.54% 555 6.31% 8,791
Edgecombe 944 73.63% 259 20.20% 79 6.16% 1,282
Forsyth 10,717 74.77% 2,610 18.21% 1,005 7.01% 14,333
Franklin 986 80.23% 151 12.29% 92 7.49% 1,229
13
6.8.18
County
Resident Non-Resident Did Not Finish Total
UsersCount % Count % Count %
Gaston 3,732 77.25% 775 16.04% 324 6.71% 4,831
Gates 131 69.68% 34 18.09% 23 12.23% 188
Graham 123 81.46% 13 8.61% 15 9.93% 151
Granville 1,756 78.85% 329 14.77% 142 6.38% 2,227
Greene 249 71.35% 71 20.34% 29 8.31% 349
Guilford 15,225 72.31% 4,484 21.30% 1,343 6.38% 21,054
Halifax 907 75.46% 206 17.14% 89 7.40% 1,202
Harnett 1,233 75.69% 282 17.31% 114 7.00% 1,629
Haywood 808 78.91% 155 15.14% 61 5.96% 1,024
Henderson 1,330 75.87% 292 16.66% 131 7.47% 1,753
Hertford 509 71.99% 160 22.63% 38 5.37% 707
Hoke 851 67.06% 350 27.58% 68 5.36% 1,269
Hyde 47 77.05% 9 14.75% 5 8.20% 61
Iredell 3,151 79.43% 552 13.91% 264 6.65% 3,967
Jackson 462 72.87% 125 19.72% 47 7.41% 634
Johnston 2,325 77.04% 484 16.04% 209 6.93% 3,018
Jones 151 71.23% 51 24.06% 10 4.72% 212
Lee 1,329 72.70% 363 19.86% 136 7.44% 1,828
Lenoir 1,042 76.06% 217 15.84% 111 8.10% 1,370
Lincoln 1,298 80.72% 205 12.75% 105 6.53% 1,608
Macon 330 73.01% 90 19.91% 32 7.08% 452
Madison 231 84.31% 25 9.12% 18 6.57% 274
Martin 416 78.20% 93 17.48% 23 4.32% 532
McDowell 660 78.95% 117 14.00% 59 7.06% 836
Mecklenburg 26,378 71.63% 7,970 21.64% 2,474 6.72% 36,824
Mitchell 192 81.36% 30 12.71% 14 5.93% 236
Montgomery 481 74.00% 115 17.69% 54 8.31% 650
Moore 1,761 72.89% 520 21.52% 135 5.59% 2,416
Nash 1,703 76.71% 358 16.13% 158 7.12% 2,220
New Hanover 5,620 71.18% 1,728 21.89% 546 6.92% 7,895
Northampton 289 73.54% 70 17.81% 34 8.65% 393
Onslow 3,455 65.58% 1,472 27.94% 341 6.47% 5,268
Orange 3,250 76.33% 760 17.85% 248 5.82% 4,258
Pamlico 145 73.23% 32 16.16% 21 10.61% 198
Pasquotank 688 72.34% 204 21.45% 59 6.20% 951
Pender 1,342 75.90% 312 17.65% 114 6.45% 1,768
Perquimans 175 71.43% 49 20.00% 21 8.57% 245
Person 461 78.14% 100 16.95% 29 4.92% 590
Pitt 3,606 73.86% 966 19.79% 310 6.35% 4,882
14
6.8.18
County
Resident Non-Resident Did Not Finish Total
UsersCount % Count % Count %
Polk 289 78.53% 59 16.03% 20 5.43% 368
Randolph 2,959 76.36% 618 15.95% 298 7.69% 3,875
Richmond 690 74.19% 157 16.88% 83 8.92% 930
Robeson 2,247 70.73% 665 20.93% 265 8.34% 3,177
Rockingham 1,434 74.49% 338 17.56% 153 7.95% 1,925
Rowan 2,982 76.07% 709 18.09% 229 5.84% 3,920
Rutherford 983 81.44% 155 12.84% 69 5.72% 1,207
Sampson 1,068 77.28% 235 17.00% 79 5.72% 1,382
Scotland 513 70.66% 168 23.14% 45 6.20% 726
Stanly 1,553 78.83% 302 15.33% 115 5.84% 1,970
Stokes 964 79.87% 143 11.85% 100 8.29% 1,207
Surry 1,209 80.60% 200 13.33% 91 6.07% 1,500
Swain 211 68.73% 62 20.20% 34 11.07% 307
Transylvania 369 82.00% 64 14.22% 17 3.78% 450
Tyrrell 56 80.00% 10 14.29% 4 5.71% 70
Union 5,012 81.92% 771 12.60% 334 5.46% 6,118
Vance 778 71.77% 215 19.83% 91 8.39% 1,084
Wake 22,657 79.07% 4,393 15.33% 1,604 5.60% 28,654
Warren 189 68.98% 73 26.64% 12 4.38% 274
Washington 192 71.91% 58 21.72% 17 6.37% 267
Watauga 653 71.84% 187 20.57% 69 7.59% 909
Wayne 2,054 75.18% 529 19.36% 149 5.45% 2,732
Wilkes 891 76.68% 177 15.23% 94 8.09% 1,162
Wilson 1,504 75.81% 349 17.59% 131 6.60% 1,984
Yadkin 642 79.75% 99 12.30% 64 7.95% 805
Yancey 234 78.26% 31 10.37% 34 11.37% 299
15
6.8.18
Appendix B
The top ten stopping points where students left RDS and did not return to finish is listed by age group. These
stopping points were not the same for each age group.
Age Group: Under 18
The top ten stopping points cover 95.14% of the students in this age bracket. Stopping points are organized in
the order in which they are asked in the Interview. The financial self-sufficiency module runs parallel to the
parent and independent path questions. Once the student passes financial self-sufficiency (if needed), the
student is then asked self-identifying questions as an independent and parent information is not requested.
#
Age Group: <18
Student stopped (DNF) – no return at these questions: Count Percentage
1 Do you claim to be a North Carolina resident? (first question) 104 5.05%
2 Confirming their address 22 1.07%
3 Military involvement 76 3.69%
4 Dependency status (independent or dependent) 1,117 54.25
5 Legal guardians (after identifying they have a legal guardian) 126 6.12%
6 Tax information 147 7.14%
7 Vehicle registration 212 10.30%
8 Driver’s license or State ID 83 4.03%
9 Employment 40 1.94%
10 Unable to prove financial self-sufficiency; chose not to continue 32 1.55%
Total: 1,959 95.14%
Age Group: 18-23
The top ten stopping points cover 92.26% of the students in this age bracket. Stopping points are organized in
the order in which they are asked in the Interview. The financial self-sufficiency module run parallel to the
parent and independent path questions. Once the student passed financial self-sufficiency (if needed), the
student is then asked self-identifying questions as an independent. Parent information is not needed.
#
Age Group: 18-23
Student stopped (DNF) – no return at these questions: Count Percentage
1 Do you claim to be a North Carolina resident? (first question) 372 3.36%
2 Military involvement 222 2.00%
3 Dependency status (independent or dependent) 4,651 41.99%
4 Tax information 423 3.82%
5 Vehicle registration 1,344 12.13%
6 Driver’s license or State ID 357 3.22%
7 Employment 201 1.81%
8 # dependents in household (financial self-sufficiency question) 419 3.78%
9 Income (financial self-sufficiency) 1,258 11.36%
10 Unable to prove financial self-sufficiency; chose not to continue 972 8.78%
Total: 10,219 92.26%
16
6.8.18
Age Group: 24+
The top ten stopping points cover 95.33% of the students in this age bracket. Stopping points are organized in
the order in which they are asked in the Interview. Students aged 24 or older and not presented with financial
self-sufficiency questions.
#
Age Group: 24+
Student stopped (DNF) – no return at these questions: Count Percentage
1 Do you claim to be a North Carolina resident? (first question) 398 10.69%
2 Confirming their address 60 1.61%
3 Military involvement 236 6.34%
4 Dependency status (independent or dependent) 1,020 27.40%
5 Tax information 243 6.53%
6 Vehicle registration 646 17.36%
7 Driver’s license or State ID 400 10.75%
8 Employment 270 7.25%
9 Voter registration 167 4.49%
10 Non-US citizen (if indicated as such in their profile) 108 2.90%
Total: 3,548 95.33%
17
6.8.18
Appendix C
Appendix C lists the RDS implementation schedule by date and campus.
Date Campus
December 5, 2016 All NC Independent and Private Colleges and Universities
February 20, 2017 Appalachian State University
Fayetteville State University
North Carolina A&T State University
North Carolina Central University
North Carolina State University
UNC Asheville
UNC Chapel Hill
UNC Charlotte
UNC Pembroke
UNC Wilmington
Western Carolina University
Randolph CC
February 22, 2017 UNC Greensboro
UNC School of Arts
February 23, 2017 Winston-Salem State University
February 27, 2017 Elizabeth City State University
March 2, 2017 East Carolina University
March 13, 2017 Alamance CC
Central Piedmont CC
Forsyth Technical CC
Guilford Technical CC
May 7, 2017 Bladen CC
Cape Fear CC
College of the Albemarle
Davidson County CC
Durham Technical CC
McDowell Technical CC
Roanoke-Chowan CC
Rowan-Cabarrus CC
Sampson CC
Stanly CC
June 26, 2017 Cleveland CC
Fayetteville Technical CC
Halifax CC
Martin CC
Mayland CC
Mitchell CC
Montgomery CC
Pamlico CC
Piedmont CC
Southeastern CC
Tri-County CC
18
6.8.18
Date Campus
September 6, 2017 Caldwell CC and Technical Institute
Central Carolina CC
Coastal Carolina CC
Haywood CC
Isothermal CC
Johnston CC
Nash CC
Pitt CC
Richmond CC
Wayne CC
Wilson CC
September 18, 2017 Brunswick CC
Edgecombe CC
James Sprunt CC
Robeson CC
Rockingham CC
Surry CC
Vance-Granville CC
Wake Tech CC
Western Piedmont CC
Wilkes CC
October 2, 2017 AB Technical CC
Beaufort CC
Blue Ridge CC
Carteret CC
Catawba CC
Craven CC
Gaston CC
Lenoir CC
Sandhills CC
South Piedmont CC

More Related Content

Similar to NCCCS Data Inquiry Presentation to State Board of Community Colleges

Voter Perceptions: Common Core State Standards and Assessments
Voter Perceptions:  Common Core State Standards and AssessmentsVoter Perceptions:  Common Core State Standards and Assessments
Voter Perceptions: Common Core State Standards and AssessmentsAchieve, Inc.
 
Adult Learners Who Are They And What Do They Want
Adult Learners   Who Are They And What Do They WantAdult Learners   Who Are They And What Do They Want
Adult Learners Who Are They And What Do They WantNiki Perkins
 
FINRA NFCS 2012 Overview-06-13-NJCFE-With NJ Data
FINRA NFCS 2012 Overview-06-13-NJCFE-With NJ DataFINRA NFCS 2012 Overview-06-13-NJCFE-With NJ Data
FINRA NFCS 2012 Overview-06-13-NJCFE-With NJ DataBarbara O'Neill
 
T. Rowe Price’s 10th Annual Parents, Kids & Money Survey
T. Rowe Price’s 10th Annual Parents, Kids & Money SurveyT. Rowe Price’s 10th Annual Parents, Kids & Money Survey
T. Rowe Price’s 10th Annual Parents, Kids & Money SurveyT. Rowe Price
 
10 20-2014 tamsa-overview
10 20-2014 tamsa-overview10 20-2014 tamsa-overview
10 20-2014 tamsa-overviewTAMSA
 
2 22-2015 tamsa-overview
2 22-2015 tamsa-overview2 22-2015 tamsa-overview
2 22-2015 tamsa-overviewTAMSA
 
Rockefeller Center WIBO Program Report
Rockefeller Center WIBO Program ReportRockefeller Center WIBO Program Report
Rockefeller Center WIBO Program ReportSteven Cheng
 
American Action Forum Higher Education National Survey
American Action Forum Higher Education National SurveyAmerican Action Forum Higher Education National Survey
American Action Forum Higher Education National SurveyAmericanActionNetwork
 
Online course ppt
Online course pptOnline course ppt
Online course pptskandersen
 
2 19-2015 tamsa-overview web-1
2 19-2015 tamsa-overview web-12 19-2015 tamsa-overview web-1
2 19-2015 tamsa-overview web-1TAMSA
 
NC Early Childhood Foundation: Attendance Counts
NC Early Childhood Foundation: Attendance CountsNC Early Childhood Foundation: Attendance Counts
NC Early Childhood Foundation: Attendance CountsAnalisa Sorrells
 
American Indians And Alaska Natives In Higher Education Promoting Access And...
American Indians And Alaska Natives In Higher Education  Promoting Access And...American Indians And Alaska Natives In Higher Education  Promoting Access And...
American Indians And Alaska Natives In Higher Education Promoting Access And...Kaela Johnson
 
2 22-2015 tamsa-overview web
2 22-2015 tamsa-overview web2 22-2015 tamsa-overview web
2 22-2015 tamsa-overview webTAMSA
 
Learning Objective Achievement Summary 12 15
Learning Objective Achievement Summary 12 15Learning Objective Achievement Summary 12 15
Learning Objective Achievement Summary 12 15Barbara O'Neill
 
10 #HigherEd Megatrends to Watch
10 #HigherEd Megatrends to Watch10 #HigherEd Megatrends to Watch
10 #HigherEd Megatrends to WatchHobsons
 
IntlSchoolAdmissionIndustryReportFINALloRes
IntlSchoolAdmissionIndustryReportFINALloResIntlSchoolAdmissionIndustryReportFINALloRes
IntlSchoolAdmissionIndustryReportFINALloResTK Ostrom
 

Similar to NCCCS Data Inquiry Presentation to State Board of Community Colleges (20)

Voter Perceptions: Common Core State Standards and Assessments
Voter Perceptions:  Common Core State Standards and AssessmentsVoter Perceptions:  Common Core State Standards and Assessments
Voter Perceptions: Common Core State Standards and Assessments
 
Adult Learners Who Are They And What Do They Want
Adult Learners   Who Are They And What Do They WantAdult Learners   Who Are They And What Do They Want
Adult Learners Who Are They And What Do They Want
 
FINRA NFCS 2012 Overview-06-13-NJCFE-With NJ Data
FINRA NFCS 2012 Overview-06-13-NJCFE-With NJ DataFINRA NFCS 2012 Overview-06-13-NJCFE-With NJ Data
FINRA NFCS 2012 Overview-06-13-NJCFE-With NJ Data
 
10 20-2014 tamsa-overview
10 20-2014 tamsa-overview10 20-2014 tamsa-overview
10 20-2014 tamsa-overview
 
TAMSA Slideshow
TAMSA SlideshowTAMSA Slideshow
TAMSA Slideshow
 
HCC Research Presentation
HCC Research PresentationHCC Research Presentation
HCC Research Presentation
 
T. Rowe Price’s 10th Annual Parents, Kids & Money Survey
T. Rowe Price’s 10th Annual Parents, Kids & Money SurveyT. Rowe Price’s 10th Annual Parents, Kids & Money Survey
T. Rowe Price’s 10th Annual Parents, Kids & Money Survey
 
10 20-2014 tamsa-overview
10 20-2014 tamsa-overview10 20-2014 tamsa-overview
10 20-2014 tamsa-overview
 
8 21-2014+tamsa-overview
8 21-2014+tamsa-overview8 21-2014+tamsa-overview
8 21-2014+tamsa-overview
 
2 22-2015 tamsa-overview
2 22-2015 tamsa-overview2 22-2015 tamsa-overview
2 22-2015 tamsa-overview
 
Rockefeller Center WIBO Program Report
Rockefeller Center WIBO Program ReportRockefeller Center WIBO Program Report
Rockefeller Center WIBO Program Report
 
American Action Forum Higher Education National Survey
American Action Forum Higher Education National SurveyAmerican Action Forum Higher Education National Survey
American Action Forum Higher Education National Survey
 
Online course ppt
Online course pptOnline course ppt
Online course ppt
 
2 19-2015 tamsa-overview web-1
2 19-2015 tamsa-overview web-12 19-2015 tamsa-overview web-1
2 19-2015 tamsa-overview web-1
 
NC Early Childhood Foundation: Attendance Counts
NC Early Childhood Foundation: Attendance CountsNC Early Childhood Foundation: Attendance Counts
NC Early Childhood Foundation: Attendance Counts
 
American Indians And Alaska Natives In Higher Education Promoting Access And...
American Indians And Alaska Natives In Higher Education  Promoting Access And...American Indians And Alaska Natives In Higher Education  Promoting Access And...
American Indians And Alaska Natives In Higher Education Promoting Access And...
 
2 22-2015 tamsa-overview web
2 22-2015 tamsa-overview web2 22-2015 tamsa-overview web
2 22-2015 tamsa-overview web
 
Learning Objective Achievement Summary 12 15
Learning Objective Achievement Summary 12 15Learning Objective Achievement Summary 12 15
Learning Objective Achievement Summary 12 15
 
10 #HigherEd Megatrends to Watch
10 #HigherEd Megatrends to Watch10 #HigherEd Megatrends to Watch
10 #HigherEd Megatrends to Watch
 
IntlSchoolAdmissionIndustryReportFINALloRes
IntlSchoolAdmissionIndustryReportFINALloResIntlSchoolAdmissionIndustryReportFINALloRes
IntlSchoolAdmissionIndustryReportFINALloRes
 

More from Molly Osborne

Advocating for Inclusive Education: Latine Parents Navigating the Special Edu...
Advocating for Inclusive Education: Latine Parents Navigating the Special Edu...Advocating for Inclusive Education: Latine Parents Navigating the Special Edu...
Advocating for Inclusive Education: Latine Parents Navigating the Special Edu...Molly Osborne
 
UNC System Transfer Trends
UNC System Transfer TrendsUNC System Transfer Trends
UNC System Transfer TrendsMolly Osborne
 
The NASSP Principal Recovery Network Guide to Recovery
The NASSP Principal Recovery Network Guide to RecoveryThe NASSP Principal Recovery Network Guide to Recovery
The NASSP Principal Recovery Network Guide to RecoveryMolly Osborne
 
FBI School Shooter Reference Guide
FBI School Shooter Reference GuideFBI School Shooter Reference Guide
FBI School Shooter Reference GuideMolly Osborne
 
North Carolina State Action Plan for School Safety
North Carolina State Action Plan for School SafetyNorth Carolina State Action Plan for School Safety
North Carolina State Action Plan for School SafetyMolly Osborne
 
Resource Guide on School Safety
Resource Guide on School SafetyResource Guide on School Safety
Resource Guide on School SafetyMolly Osborne
 
North Carolina Community College System 2022 Performance Report
North Carolina Community College System 2022 Performance ReportNorth Carolina Community College System 2022 Performance Report
North Carolina Community College System 2022 Performance ReportMolly Osborne
 
Contact information for N.C. community college financial aid offices
Contact information for N.C. community college financial aid officesContact information for N.C. community college financial aid offices
Contact information for N.C. community college financial aid officesMolly Osborne
 
ApprenticeshipNC 2019-2020 Annual Report
ApprenticeshipNC 2019-2020 Annual ReportApprenticeshipNC 2019-2020 Annual Report
ApprenticeshipNC 2019-2020 Annual ReportMolly Osborne
 
Allocation for Governor's Emergency Education Relief (GEER) Fund
Allocation for Governor's Emergency Education Relief (GEER) FundAllocation for Governor's Emergency Education Relief (GEER) Fund
Allocation for Governor's Emergency Education Relief (GEER) FundMolly Osborne
 
Supreme Court DACA Opinion
Supreme Court DACA OpinionSupreme Court DACA Opinion
Supreme Court DACA OpinionMolly Osborne
 
Land of Sky Educational Attainment & Workforce Collaborative Preliminary Repo...
Land of Sky Educational Attainment & Workforce Collaborative Preliminary Repo...Land of Sky Educational Attainment & Workforce Collaborative Preliminary Repo...
Land of Sky Educational Attainment & Workforce Collaborative Preliminary Repo...Molly Osborne
 
Vance-Granville Community College CARES Act Guidelines
Vance-Granville Community College CARES Act GuidelinesVance-Granville Community College CARES Act Guidelines
Vance-Granville Community College CARES Act GuidelinesMolly Osborne
 
Resuming face-to-face instruction
Resuming face-to-face instructionResuming face-to-face instruction
Resuming face-to-face instructionMolly Osborne
 
Coronavirus Burden By State
Coronavirus Burden By StateCoronavirus Burden By State
Coronavirus Burden By StateMolly Osborne
 
CARES Act funding letter for higher education institutional costs
CARES Act funding letter for higher education institutional costsCARES Act funding letter for higher education institutional costs
CARES Act funding letter for higher education institutional costsMolly Osborne
 
Bridge 2019: A gathering for North Carolina's future
Bridge 2019: A gathering for North Carolina's futureBridge 2019: A gathering for North Carolina's future
Bridge 2019: A gathering for North Carolina's futureMolly Osborne
 
Peer pressure activity
Peer pressure activityPeer pressure activity
Peer pressure activityMolly Osborne
 
Bright Spots: Project SECURE (Wake County)
Bright Spots: Project SECURE (Wake County)Bright Spots: Project SECURE (Wake County)
Bright Spots: Project SECURE (Wake County)Molly Osborne
 
Bright Spots: STEP (Edgecombe & Nash Counties)
Bright Spots: STEP (Edgecombe & Nash Counties)Bright Spots: STEP (Edgecombe & Nash Counties)
Bright Spots: STEP (Edgecombe & Nash Counties)Molly Osborne
 

More from Molly Osborne (20)

Advocating for Inclusive Education: Latine Parents Navigating the Special Edu...
Advocating for Inclusive Education: Latine Parents Navigating the Special Edu...Advocating for Inclusive Education: Latine Parents Navigating the Special Edu...
Advocating for Inclusive Education: Latine Parents Navigating the Special Edu...
 
UNC System Transfer Trends
UNC System Transfer TrendsUNC System Transfer Trends
UNC System Transfer Trends
 
The NASSP Principal Recovery Network Guide to Recovery
The NASSP Principal Recovery Network Guide to RecoveryThe NASSP Principal Recovery Network Guide to Recovery
The NASSP Principal Recovery Network Guide to Recovery
 
FBI School Shooter Reference Guide
FBI School Shooter Reference GuideFBI School Shooter Reference Guide
FBI School Shooter Reference Guide
 
North Carolina State Action Plan for School Safety
North Carolina State Action Plan for School SafetyNorth Carolina State Action Plan for School Safety
North Carolina State Action Plan for School Safety
 
Resource Guide on School Safety
Resource Guide on School SafetyResource Guide on School Safety
Resource Guide on School Safety
 
North Carolina Community College System 2022 Performance Report
North Carolina Community College System 2022 Performance ReportNorth Carolina Community College System 2022 Performance Report
North Carolina Community College System 2022 Performance Report
 
Contact information for N.C. community college financial aid offices
Contact information for N.C. community college financial aid officesContact information for N.C. community college financial aid offices
Contact information for N.C. community college financial aid offices
 
ApprenticeshipNC 2019-2020 Annual Report
ApprenticeshipNC 2019-2020 Annual ReportApprenticeshipNC 2019-2020 Annual Report
ApprenticeshipNC 2019-2020 Annual Report
 
Allocation for Governor's Emergency Education Relief (GEER) Fund
Allocation for Governor's Emergency Education Relief (GEER) FundAllocation for Governor's Emergency Education Relief (GEER) Fund
Allocation for Governor's Emergency Education Relief (GEER) Fund
 
Supreme Court DACA Opinion
Supreme Court DACA OpinionSupreme Court DACA Opinion
Supreme Court DACA Opinion
 
Land of Sky Educational Attainment & Workforce Collaborative Preliminary Repo...
Land of Sky Educational Attainment & Workforce Collaborative Preliminary Repo...Land of Sky Educational Attainment & Workforce Collaborative Preliminary Repo...
Land of Sky Educational Attainment & Workforce Collaborative Preliminary Repo...
 
Vance-Granville Community College CARES Act Guidelines
Vance-Granville Community College CARES Act GuidelinesVance-Granville Community College CARES Act Guidelines
Vance-Granville Community College CARES Act Guidelines
 
Resuming face-to-face instruction
Resuming face-to-face instructionResuming face-to-face instruction
Resuming face-to-face instruction
 
Coronavirus Burden By State
Coronavirus Burden By StateCoronavirus Burden By State
Coronavirus Burden By State
 
CARES Act funding letter for higher education institutional costs
CARES Act funding letter for higher education institutional costsCARES Act funding letter for higher education institutional costs
CARES Act funding letter for higher education institutional costs
 
Bridge 2019: A gathering for North Carolina's future
Bridge 2019: A gathering for North Carolina's futureBridge 2019: A gathering for North Carolina's future
Bridge 2019: A gathering for North Carolina's future
 
Peer pressure activity
Peer pressure activityPeer pressure activity
Peer pressure activity
 
Bright Spots: Project SECURE (Wake County)
Bright Spots: Project SECURE (Wake County)Bright Spots: Project SECURE (Wake County)
Bright Spots: Project SECURE (Wake County)
 
Bright Spots: STEP (Edgecombe & Nash Counties)
Bright Spots: STEP (Edgecombe & Nash Counties)Bright Spots: STEP (Edgecombe & Nash Counties)
Bright Spots: STEP (Edgecombe & Nash Counties)
 

Recently uploaded

Introduction to AI in Higher Education_draft.pptx
Introduction to AI in Higher Education_draft.pptxIntroduction to AI in Higher Education_draft.pptx
Introduction to AI in Higher Education_draft.pptxpboyjonauth
 
Framing an Appropriate Research Question 6b9b26d93da94caf993c038d9efcdedb.pdf
Framing an Appropriate Research Question 6b9b26d93da94caf993c038d9efcdedb.pdfFraming an Appropriate Research Question 6b9b26d93da94caf993c038d9efcdedb.pdf
Framing an Appropriate Research Question 6b9b26d93da94caf993c038d9efcdedb.pdfUjwalaBharambe
 
EPANDING THE CONTENT OF AN OUTLINE using notes.pptx
EPANDING THE CONTENT OF AN OUTLINE using notes.pptxEPANDING THE CONTENT OF AN OUTLINE using notes.pptx
EPANDING THE CONTENT OF AN OUTLINE using notes.pptxRaymartEstabillo3
 
HỌC TỐT TIẾNG ANH 11 THEO CHƯƠNG TRÌNH GLOBAL SUCCESS ĐÁP ÁN CHI TIẾT - CẢ NĂ...
HỌC TỐT TIẾNG ANH 11 THEO CHƯƠNG TRÌNH GLOBAL SUCCESS ĐÁP ÁN CHI TIẾT - CẢ NĂ...HỌC TỐT TIẾNG ANH 11 THEO CHƯƠNG TRÌNH GLOBAL SUCCESS ĐÁP ÁN CHI TIẾT - CẢ NĂ...
HỌC TỐT TIẾNG ANH 11 THEO CHƯƠNG TRÌNH GLOBAL SUCCESS ĐÁP ÁN CHI TIẾT - CẢ NĂ...Nguyen Thanh Tu Collection
 
Romantic Opera MUSIC FOR GRADE NINE pptx
Romantic Opera MUSIC FOR GRADE NINE pptxRomantic Opera MUSIC FOR GRADE NINE pptx
Romantic Opera MUSIC FOR GRADE NINE pptxsqpmdrvczh
 
ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS PowerPoint Presentation
ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS PowerPoint PresentationROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS PowerPoint Presentation
ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS PowerPoint PresentationAadityaSharma884161
 
Earth Day Presentation wow hello nice great
Earth Day Presentation wow hello nice greatEarth Day Presentation wow hello nice great
Earth Day Presentation wow hello nice greatYousafMalik24
 
Crayon Activity Handout For the Crayon A
Crayon Activity Handout For the Crayon ACrayon Activity Handout For the Crayon A
Crayon Activity Handout For the Crayon AUnboundStockton
 
Field Attribute Index Feature in Odoo 17
Field Attribute Index Feature in Odoo 17Field Attribute Index Feature in Odoo 17
Field Attribute Index Feature in Odoo 17Celine George
 
ECONOMIC CONTEXT - LONG FORM TV DRAMA - PPT
ECONOMIC CONTEXT - LONG FORM TV DRAMA - PPTECONOMIC CONTEXT - LONG FORM TV DRAMA - PPT
ECONOMIC CONTEXT - LONG FORM TV DRAMA - PPTiammrhaywood
 
How to Configure Email Server in Odoo 17
How to Configure Email Server in Odoo 17How to Configure Email Server in Odoo 17
How to Configure Email Server in Odoo 17Celine George
 
Keynote by Prof. Wurzer at Nordex about IP-design
Keynote by Prof. Wurzer at Nordex about IP-designKeynote by Prof. Wurzer at Nordex about IP-design
Keynote by Prof. Wurzer at Nordex about IP-designMIPLM
 
DATA STRUCTURE AND ALGORITHM for beginners
DATA STRUCTURE AND ALGORITHM for beginnersDATA STRUCTURE AND ALGORITHM for beginners
DATA STRUCTURE AND ALGORITHM for beginnersSabitha Banu
 
Types of Journalistic Writing Grade 8.pptx
Types of Journalistic Writing Grade 8.pptxTypes of Journalistic Writing Grade 8.pptx
Types of Journalistic Writing Grade 8.pptxEyham Joco
 
Influencing policy (training slides from Fast Track Impact)
Influencing policy (training slides from Fast Track Impact)Influencing policy (training slides from Fast Track Impact)
Influencing policy (training slides from Fast Track Impact)Mark Reed
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Introduction to AI in Higher Education_draft.pptx
Introduction to AI in Higher Education_draft.pptxIntroduction to AI in Higher Education_draft.pptx
Introduction to AI in Higher Education_draft.pptx
 
Rapple "Scholarly Communications and the Sustainable Development Goals"
Rapple "Scholarly Communications and the Sustainable Development Goals"Rapple "Scholarly Communications and the Sustainable Development Goals"
Rapple "Scholarly Communications and the Sustainable Development Goals"
 
Model Call Girl in Bikash Puri Delhi reach out to us at 🔝9953056974🔝
Model Call Girl in Bikash Puri  Delhi reach out to us at 🔝9953056974🔝Model Call Girl in Bikash Puri  Delhi reach out to us at 🔝9953056974🔝
Model Call Girl in Bikash Puri Delhi reach out to us at 🔝9953056974🔝
 
OS-operating systems- ch04 (Threads) ...
OS-operating systems- ch04 (Threads) ...OS-operating systems- ch04 (Threads) ...
OS-operating systems- ch04 (Threads) ...
 
9953330565 Low Rate Call Girls In Rohini Delhi NCR
9953330565 Low Rate Call Girls In Rohini  Delhi NCR9953330565 Low Rate Call Girls In Rohini  Delhi NCR
9953330565 Low Rate Call Girls In Rohini Delhi NCR
 
Framing an Appropriate Research Question 6b9b26d93da94caf993c038d9efcdedb.pdf
Framing an Appropriate Research Question 6b9b26d93da94caf993c038d9efcdedb.pdfFraming an Appropriate Research Question 6b9b26d93da94caf993c038d9efcdedb.pdf
Framing an Appropriate Research Question 6b9b26d93da94caf993c038d9efcdedb.pdf
 
EPANDING THE CONTENT OF AN OUTLINE using notes.pptx
EPANDING THE CONTENT OF AN OUTLINE using notes.pptxEPANDING THE CONTENT OF AN OUTLINE using notes.pptx
EPANDING THE CONTENT OF AN OUTLINE using notes.pptx
 
HỌC TỐT TIẾNG ANH 11 THEO CHƯƠNG TRÌNH GLOBAL SUCCESS ĐÁP ÁN CHI TIẾT - CẢ NĂ...
HỌC TỐT TIẾNG ANH 11 THEO CHƯƠNG TRÌNH GLOBAL SUCCESS ĐÁP ÁN CHI TIẾT - CẢ NĂ...HỌC TỐT TIẾNG ANH 11 THEO CHƯƠNG TRÌNH GLOBAL SUCCESS ĐÁP ÁN CHI TIẾT - CẢ NĂ...
HỌC TỐT TIẾNG ANH 11 THEO CHƯƠNG TRÌNH GLOBAL SUCCESS ĐÁP ÁN CHI TIẾT - CẢ NĂ...
 
Romantic Opera MUSIC FOR GRADE NINE pptx
Romantic Opera MUSIC FOR GRADE NINE pptxRomantic Opera MUSIC FOR GRADE NINE pptx
Romantic Opera MUSIC FOR GRADE NINE pptx
 
ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS PowerPoint Presentation
ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS PowerPoint PresentationROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS PowerPoint Presentation
ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS PowerPoint Presentation
 
Earth Day Presentation wow hello nice great
Earth Day Presentation wow hello nice greatEarth Day Presentation wow hello nice great
Earth Day Presentation wow hello nice great
 
Crayon Activity Handout For the Crayon A
Crayon Activity Handout For the Crayon ACrayon Activity Handout For the Crayon A
Crayon Activity Handout For the Crayon A
 
Field Attribute Index Feature in Odoo 17
Field Attribute Index Feature in Odoo 17Field Attribute Index Feature in Odoo 17
Field Attribute Index Feature in Odoo 17
 
ECONOMIC CONTEXT - LONG FORM TV DRAMA - PPT
ECONOMIC CONTEXT - LONG FORM TV DRAMA - PPTECONOMIC CONTEXT - LONG FORM TV DRAMA - PPT
ECONOMIC CONTEXT - LONG FORM TV DRAMA - PPT
 
How to Configure Email Server in Odoo 17
How to Configure Email Server in Odoo 17How to Configure Email Server in Odoo 17
How to Configure Email Server in Odoo 17
 
Keynote by Prof. Wurzer at Nordex about IP-design
Keynote by Prof. Wurzer at Nordex about IP-designKeynote by Prof. Wurzer at Nordex about IP-design
Keynote by Prof. Wurzer at Nordex about IP-design
 
Model Call Girl in Tilak Nagar Delhi reach out to us at 🔝9953056974🔝
Model Call Girl in Tilak Nagar Delhi reach out to us at 🔝9953056974🔝Model Call Girl in Tilak Nagar Delhi reach out to us at 🔝9953056974🔝
Model Call Girl in Tilak Nagar Delhi reach out to us at 🔝9953056974🔝
 
DATA STRUCTURE AND ALGORITHM for beginners
DATA STRUCTURE AND ALGORITHM for beginnersDATA STRUCTURE AND ALGORITHM for beginners
DATA STRUCTURE AND ALGORITHM for beginners
 
Types of Journalistic Writing Grade 8.pptx
Types of Journalistic Writing Grade 8.pptxTypes of Journalistic Writing Grade 8.pptx
Types of Journalistic Writing Grade 8.pptx
 
Influencing policy (training slides from Fast Track Impact)
Influencing policy (training slides from Fast Track Impact)Influencing policy (training slides from Fast Track Impact)
Influencing policy (training slides from Fast Track Impact)
 

NCCCS Data Inquiry Presentation to State Board of Community Colleges

  • 1. Residency Determination Service Data Analysis for the NC Association of Community College Presidents Presentation June 13, 2018
  • 2. 2 6.8.18 Key Definitions and Assumptions: • This analysis includes all students requesting an Initial Consideration between January 1, 2017 and January 1, 2018 whether applying to a North Carolina Community College (NCCCS), University of North Carolina institution (UNC), or North Carolina private or independent college or university (NCICU). • This analysis is based on a student’s Initial Consideration (first experience) through RDS. A student’s final classification is not reflected in this report. Therefore, those students who initially received a non- resident classification may have subsequently received a resident classification through a Reconsideration or Appeal. • Geographic region, age, gender, and student experience data were based on 289,142 students who started an Online Interview. • RDS does not ask a student to provide their race or ethnicity when completing a request for classification therefore, ethnicity and race data was pulled from 125,448 NCCCS admission applications. • Resident: Students classified as Resident completed the RDS Online Interview as presented to them and received a Resident classification or qualified for the Active Duty Military benefit. • Non-Resident: Students classified as Non-Resident included students who completed the RDS Online Interview as presented to them and received a Non-Resident classification, and students who confirmed they did not want to be considered for residency. NCCCS campuses require a student to complete RDS even if they live outside of North Carolina and/or do not want to be considered for residency. • Did Not Finish: Students classified as Did Not Finish (DNF) are students who began the Interview, stopped at some point during the Interview, and never returned to finish.
  • 3. 3 6.8.18 The questions outlined in this document are the questions posed to the North Carolina State Education Assistance Authority (NCSEAA) in the February 15, 2018 NCACCP Request for Data Analysis Memorandum. 1. What are the most common questions where people stop during the Interview (and do not return to finish)? RDS analyzed the user experience for 289,142 students who received classifications of Resident, Non-Resident, and those who Did Not Finish (DNF) the RDS Online Interview between January 1, 2017 and January 1, 2018. Of the 289,142 students, 6.31% of students Did Not Finish the RDS Online Interview. RDS identified where each age group of students most commonly stopped in the Interview and therefore, did not receive a classification. Student age was divided into three ranges: under 18, 18-23, and 24 and older. These age ranges were used since the RDS Online Interview presents different questions to students depending on these age ranges when completing the Interview. The detailed breakdown for each age group is listed in Appendix B and reflects the top 10 questions on which students stopped during the Online Interview and did not return. The top ten questions were not the same for each age group; however, there were seven common stopping points across all three age groups. Three of the seven common stopping points occur before a student is presented with specific domiciliary questions related to tax, vehicle or employment information. Table # 1
  • 4. 4 6.8.18 As noted in the table above, the largest percentage of students stopped when presented with dependency status questions. Dependency status questions are similar across all age groups although students under age 18 have a few additional questions specific to their circumstances. Dependency Questions - Under Age 18 • Are you a court appointed emancipated minor? • Are you a ward of the state? • Does someone other than your parent have legal guardianship of you? • Are you married? • Are one or both of your parents living? • Do your parents provide 50% or more of your total cost of living? Total cost of living means the cost of your food, clothing, shelter, transportation, school or college tuition, and other incidental costs of living added together. Dependency Questions – Ages 18-23 • Are you now, or have you ever been, a Ward of the State? If you were a Ward of the State but have been adopted, select no. • Are you married? • Are one or both of your parents living? • Do your parents provide 50% or more of your total cost of living? Total cost of living means the cost of your food, clothing, shelter, transportation, school or college tuition, and other incidental costs of living added together. Dependency Questions – Ages 24+ • Are you married? • Are one or both of your parents living? • Do your parents provide 50% or more of your total cost of living? Total cost of living means the cost of your food, clothing, shelter, transportation, school or college tuition, and other incidental costs of living added together. Also considered were the questions where most students (by volume) ended their RDS Online Interview. It is important to note that some of the questions do not impact certain age groups. For example, any questions regarding financial self-sufficiency are never asked of students ages 24 and older who are considered to be independent. The questions in the table (2) are listed as they are presented to the student. The data is summarized into three defined sections where students end their Interview and do not return. Section 1 identifies that 48.62% of students never complete the initial questions (1-3 in table) in the Online Interview. Section 2 indicates that 25.89% (4-7 in table) stop at some point during the domiciliary specific questions for either themselves or their parents. Lastly, Section 3 indicates that 15.95% (8-10 in table) stop at some point after claiming to be financially self-sufficient.
  • 5. 5 6.8.18 Table # 2 # Student stopped (DNF) – no return at these question(s): Count Percentage Section % 1 Do you claim to be a North Carolina resident? (first question) 874 5.18% Section 1 48.62 % 2 Military involvement 534 3.17% 3 Dependency status 6,788 40.27% 4 Tax information 813 4.82% Section 2 25.89% 5 Vehicle registration 2,202 13.06% 6 Driver’s license or State ID 840 4.98% 7 Employment 511 3.03% 8 # dependents in household (financial self-sufficiency question) 423 2.51% Section 3 15.95% 9 Income (financial self-sufficiency) 1,261 7.48% 10 Unable to prove financial self-sufficiency; chose not to continue 1,004 5.96% Total: 15,250 90.46% 2. What are the demographics of people who do not complete the Interview? RDS reviewed age, gender, ethnicity, race and geographic region for students who Did Not Finish the RDS Online Interview. Of the 6.31% who Did Not Finish the Interview, the majority of students were between the ages of 18 and 23 and female. Table # 3 6.31% 4.77% 8.40% 4.65% 81.57% 86.35% 76.13% 77.66% 12.12% 8.88% 15.47% 17.69% TOTAL < 18 (41,663) 18-23 (134,929) 24+ (112,550) CLASSIFICATION AND DID NOT FINISH BY AGE ALL STUDENTS (289,142) Did Not Finish Resident Non-Resident
  • 6. 6 6.8.18 Of the age 18-23 students who Did Not Finish RDS (11,073), 47.35% (5,245) ended their Interview before they were presented with domiciliary specific questions, 20.98% (2,325) ended their Interview when asked domiciliary specific questions, and 20.92% (2,648) ended their Interview when asked about income during financial self-sufficiency. Table # 4 The second demographic considered when analyzing students who Did Not Finish the RDS Online Interview was gender. Gender showed minimal difference in terms of students who started the RDS Online Interview and did not return. Table # 5 Residents, 81.57% Non-Residents, 12.12% 2,057 (11.28%)11,073 (60.70%) 5,113 (28.03%) Did Not Finish, 6.31% DID NOT FINISH DETAIL BY AGE GROUP ALL STUDENTS (289,142) DNF (<18) DNF (18-23) DNF (24+) 39.03% 60.97% 37.95% 62.05% MALE FEMALE STUDENTS WHO DID NOT FINISH (DNF) BY GENDER (18,243 STUDENTS) Total (289,142) Did Not Finish (18,243)
  • 7. 7 6.8.18 A third demographic considered was race and ethnicity for students who did not complete RDS. This set of data is the only data in this document which is NCCCS specific. RDS does not ask a student to provide their race or ethnicity when completing a request for classification therefore, ethnicity and race data was pulled from 125,448 NCCCS admission applications. The total number of students who Did Not Finish RDS is 18,243. The total number of NCCCS admission applications started by students who Did Not Finish RDS is 5,206. If a student submitted more than one admission application, the student is included more than once in the count. The race listed as Multiple recognizes students who identified with more than one race on their admission application(s). Table # 6 Race Did Not Finish RDS % Did Not Finish White 1,996 38.34% Black or African American 1,781 34.21% Did Not Specify 1,010 19.40% Multiple 254 4.88% Asian 84 1.61% American Indian or Alaska Native 74 1.42% Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander 7 0.13% Total: 5,206 4.16% The NCCCS admission applications request ethnicity data only on Hispanic or Latino students. The question posed is “Are you Hispanic or Latino?” Students have the option to not answer, indicate “yes” or indicate “no”. No additional ethnicities are listed on the admission application for students to identify. Of the 125,448 admission applications, 10,787 applications identified with Hispanic or Latino ethnicity, 29,381 applications did not specify, and 85,280 applications identified as Not Hispanic or Latino. The total admission applications with students who identified as Hispanic or Latino (10,787) and Did Not Finish RDS was 589 which amounted to 0.47% of all admission applications cross referenced with RDS and 5.46% of those who identified as Hispanic or Latino.
  • 8. 8 6.8.18 The final demographic considered for students who Did Not Finish the RDS Online Interview was geographic location. Students not finishing RDS varied across the State. For this analysis, the zip code the student provided to RDS was organized by North Carolina county. There were five counties with 10% or higher non-completion rates. These counties were Gates, Yancey, Swain, Pamlico, and Columbus. All but one of these counties had less than 250 total students and less than 35 students not finishing RDS. Columbus County was an exception to this rule with 117 students not finishing RDS Online Interview out of 1,143 total students. A detailed listing of each North Carolina zip code and related classifications is included in Appendix A. 3. Based on the research from questions 1 and 2, what actions will be taken to simplify the questions or help people answer the questions? The primary stopping point evident in this data analysis is students leaving the RDS Online Interview when presented with the dependency status questions. The dependency questions are different based on age, but this stopping point was number one across all age groups. Recent feedback in student focus groups also identified this area as a point of confusion. RDS will consider ways to allow students to better identify their unique situation and continue in the Interview in a more directed manner. The second primary stopping point evident in this data analysis is students leaving the RDS Online Interview when presented with vehicle registration questions. RDS will research further why students are leaving this section of questions and consider possibilities for reducing this percentage. The Higher Education Collaborative Advisory Committee (HECAC) recently made a policy decision to allow students who are married or have a dependent, regardless of age, to be considered as independents when completing RDS. Across all age groups, 15.95% of students left their Interview at some point when completing financial self-sufficiency questions. RDS will implementing this functionality in early summer.
  • 9. 9 6.8.18 4. Of those who are classified as in-state residents, what are the most common data points? RDS identified, by age group, where students who received a Resident classification most commonly completed the Online Interview as Resident. The questions were reviewed by age group since the RDS Online Interview presents different questions to students depending on their age when they complete the Interview. Once the most common data points within each age group were identified, these data points were compared across all three age groups. Twelve common points emerged across all three age groups of the 289,142 total students. The common data points in the chart are listed as they are presented to the student. Table # 7 # Top Common Data Points for Residents Count Percentage Cumulative Percentage 1 Student identified self or parent as military 7,198 3.05% 2 Resident after vehicle registration (parent and independent) 187,719 79.63% 82.68% 3 Resident after driver’s license or State ID (parent and independent) 3,320 1.41% 84.09% 4 Resident after voter registration (parent and independent) 20,718 8.78% 92.87% 5 Resident after employment (parent and independent) 3,122 1.32% 94.19% 6 Resident after high school (parent and independent) 5,347 2.27% 96.46% 7 Resident after tax (for student as a dependent) 408 0.17% 96.63% 8 Resident after vehicle registration (for student as a dependent) 384 0.16% 96.79% 9 Resident after driver’s license or State ID (for student as a dependent) 923 0.39% 97.19% 10 Resident after voter registration (for student as a dependent) 268 0.11% 97.29% 11 Resident after employment (for student as a dependent) 64 .03% 97.32% 12 Resident after student identified family as receiving social service benefits (parent and independent) 5,722 2.43% 99.76% Total: 235,293 There was minimal difference across the age groups in terms of residency classification. A total of 261 students under age 18 identified as wards of the state. This was the only difference across all three age groups.
  • 10. 10 6.8.18 5. Of those who are classified as out-of-state residents, what are the most common data points? The same methodology for the Residency classification analysis was followed for the Non-Resident analysis. RDS identified by age group the points where students who received a Non-Resident classification most commonly completed the Online Interview. Once the most common data points within each age group were identified, these data points were compared across all three age groups. There were 10 common data points which emerged across all three age groups. The common data points in the chart are listed as they are presented to the student. Table # 8 # Top Completion Points for Non-Residents Count Percentage Total % Complete 1 Non-Resident after selecting no to claiming residency (first question) 1,050 3.00% 3.00% 2 Non-Resident after not meeting the Active Duty Military benefit 669 1.91% 45.58% 3 Non-Resident due to ineligible non-US citizen status 2,997 8.55% 4 Non-Resident after being unable to prove financial self-sufficiency and choosing to end the Online Interview 2,810 8.02% 5 Non-Resident after not providing information on parent (such as a unique identifier) 3,228 9.21% 6 Non-Resident due to duration 4,627 13.21% 7 Non-Resident after confirming filed NC taxes as a Non-Resident 1,641 4.68% 8 Non-Resident after completing social services questions 9,270 26.46% 49.88%9 Non-Resident after identifying they had no additional parent 5,343 15.25% 10 Non-Resident after completing veteran questions 2,864 8.17% Total: 34,499 98.46% Unlike students with Resident classifications, students with Non-Resident classifications showed slight differences across age groups and sectors. Students under age 18 and age 24 and older tended to complete the full Interview before receiving a Non-Resident classification while students ages 18-23 received Non-Resident classifications at the end of the Interview but also when not meeting the financial self-sufficiency threshold (70% of federal poverty guidelines). Students age 24 and older had a larger percentage of students not meeting the 12-month duration requirement (19.84%) compared to students under age 18 (5.92%) and students ages 18-23 (8.06%).
  • 11. 11 6.8.18 6. Based on the research in questions 4 and 5, what questions can be eliminated from the Interview? Since going live in December 2016, steps have been taken at both a policy and operational level to make the Online Interview as user friendly as possible while staying within the guidelines of residency law. To date, RDS has completed 22 releases to simplify and improve the RDS Online Interview experience. Some of the enhancements include: • Establishing policy to permit students over the age of 24 to be considered independent for completing the Online Interview (May, 12, 2017) • Removing the questions allowing students to identify with the “Five Year” residency rule and providing them with an immediate classification (July 17, 2017) • Removing detailed questions within the voting, vehicle, and marriage information sections. (May 4, 2017 and August 22, 2017) • Add the ability for student to go directly from RDS back to their open CFNC admission application(s). (August 2, 2017) • Adding back buttons to various screens within the dependency section allowing a student to determine which responses best address his or her personal situation (March 6, 2018) • Added the Student Help Line on each page of the Online Interview (April 26, 2018) • Modifying questions for clarity and adding or modifying help text (multiple releases) Upcoming enhancements to be made include: • The Higher Education Collaborative Advisory Committee (HECAC) recently made a policy decision to allow students who are married or have a dependent, regardless of age, to be considered as independents when completing RDS. RDS will modify the Online Interview to remove the financial self- sufficiency questions for students in this demographic. This enhancement will be implemented in early summer. • Modifying the student status page(s) to notify a student of why they received a non-resident determination. • Providing students a historical record of their residency requests with RDS. For the remainder of 2018, RDS will continue to enhance the Online Interview based upon feedback from students, campuses and counselors, processing trends, and additional data analysis. HECAC will revisit this analysis in early 2019 to evaluate the impact of the interim modifications with all undergraduate campuses having participated for a full year.
  • 12. 12 6.8.18 Appendix A Appendix A represents all students who started RDS between January 1, 2017 and January 1, 2018. This includes students who may be applying to a NCCCS campus, UNC campus, or NCICU campus (for financial aid) within or without of their county. County Resident Non-Resident Did Not Finish Total UsersCount % Count % Count % Alamance 4,432 74.93% 1,069 18.07% 414 7.00% 5,915 Alexander 505 82.79% 63 10.33% 42 6.89% 610 Alleghany 114 77.03% 25 16.89% 9 6.08% 148 Anson 338 75.45% 83 18.53% 27 6.03% 448 Ashe 319 80.56% 56 14.14% 21 5.30% 396 Avery 229 80.63% 40 14.08% 15 5.28% 284 Beaufort 831 76.45% 181 16.65% 75 6.90% 1,087 Bertie 355 72.75% 107 21.93% 26 5.33% 488 Bladen 697 69.84% 210 21.04% 91 9.12% 998 Brunswick 1,715 71.85% 501 20.99% 170 7.12% 2,387 Buncombe 3,889 75.96% 907 17.71% 324 6.33% 5,120 Burke 1,268 79.10% 202 12.60% 133 8.30% 1,603 Cabarrus 5,428 76.96% 1,217 17.26% 408 5.78% 7,053 Caldwell 1,102 79.00% 189 13.55% 104 7.46% 1,395 Camden 167 78.40% 31 14.55% 15 7.04% 213 Carteret 859 77.60% 184 16.62% 64 5.78% 1,107 Caswell 211 72.26% 60 20.55% 21 7.19% 292 Catawba 2,643 79.92% 443 13.40% 221 6.68% 3,307 Chatham 793 77.44% 160 15.63% 71 6.93% 1,024 Cherokee 318 75.89% 77 18.38% 24 5.73% 419 Chowan 215 71.67% 62 20.67% 23 7.67% 300 Clay 111 80.43% 23 16.67% 4 2.90% 138 Cleveland 1,696 79.40% 307 14.37% 133 6.23% 2,136 Columbus 815 71.30% 211 18.46% 117 10.24% 1,143 Craven 1,870 72.23% 558 21.55% 161 6.22% 2,589 Cumberland 7,206 67.79% 2,808 26.42% 616 5.79% 10,630 Currituck 291 75.39% 60 15.54% 35 9.07% 386 Dare 501 76.37% 118 17.99% 37 5.64% 656 Davidson 3,149 75.77% 728 17.52% 279 6.71% 4,156 Davie 973 80.21% 147 12.12% 93 7.67% 1,213 Duplin 925 72.66% 255 20.03% 93 7.31% 1,273 Durham 6,342 72.14% 1,894 21.54% 555 6.31% 8,791 Edgecombe 944 73.63% 259 20.20% 79 6.16% 1,282 Forsyth 10,717 74.77% 2,610 18.21% 1,005 7.01% 14,333 Franklin 986 80.23% 151 12.29% 92 7.49% 1,229
  • 13. 13 6.8.18 County Resident Non-Resident Did Not Finish Total UsersCount % Count % Count % Gaston 3,732 77.25% 775 16.04% 324 6.71% 4,831 Gates 131 69.68% 34 18.09% 23 12.23% 188 Graham 123 81.46% 13 8.61% 15 9.93% 151 Granville 1,756 78.85% 329 14.77% 142 6.38% 2,227 Greene 249 71.35% 71 20.34% 29 8.31% 349 Guilford 15,225 72.31% 4,484 21.30% 1,343 6.38% 21,054 Halifax 907 75.46% 206 17.14% 89 7.40% 1,202 Harnett 1,233 75.69% 282 17.31% 114 7.00% 1,629 Haywood 808 78.91% 155 15.14% 61 5.96% 1,024 Henderson 1,330 75.87% 292 16.66% 131 7.47% 1,753 Hertford 509 71.99% 160 22.63% 38 5.37% 707 Hoke 851 67.06% 350 27.58% 68 5.36% 1,269 Hyde 47 77.05% 9 14.75% 5 8.20% 61 Iredell 3,151 79.43% 552 13.91% 264 6.65% 3,967 Jackson 462 72.87% 125 19.72% 47 7.41% 634 Johnston 2,325 77.04% 484 16.04% 209 6.93% 3,018 Jones 151 71.23% 51 24.06% 10 4.72% 212 Lee 1,329 72.70% 363 19.86% 136 7.44% 1,828 Lenoir 1,042 76.06% 217 15.84% 111 8.10% 1,370 Lincoln 1,298 80.72% 205 12.75% 105 6.53% 1,608 Macon 330 73.01% 90 19.91% 32 7.08% 452 Madison 231 84.31% 25 9.12% 18 6.57% 274 Martin 416 78.20% 93 17.48% 23 4.32% 532 McDowell 660 78.95% 117 14.00% 59 7.06% 836 Mecklenburg 26,378 71.63% 7,970 21.64% 2,474 6.72% 36,824 Mitchell 192 81.36% 30 12.71% 14 5.93% 236 Montgomery 481 74.00% 115 17.69% 54 8.31% 650 Moore 1,761 72.89% 520 21.52% 135 5.59% 2,416 Nash 1,703 76.71% 358 16.13% 158 7.12% 2,220 New Hanover 5,620 71.18% 1,728 21.89% 546 6.92% 7,895 Northampton 289 73.54% 70 17.81% 34 8.65% 393 Onslow 3,455 65.58% 1,472 27.94% 341 6.47% 5,268 Orange 3,250 76.33% 760 17.85% 248 5.82% 4,258 Pamlico 145 73.23% 32 16.16% 21 10.61% 198 Pasquotank 688 72.34% 204 21.45% 59 6.20% 951 Pender 1,342 75.90% 312 17.65% 114 6.45% 1,768 Perquimans 175 71.43% 49 20.00% 21 8.57% 245 Person 461 78.14% 100 16.95% 29 4.92% 590 Pitt 3,606 73.86% 966 19.79% 310 6.35% 4,882
  • 14. 14 6.8.18 County Resident Non-Resident Did Not Finish Total UsersCount % Count % Count % Polk 289 78.53% 59 16.03% 20 5.43% 368 Randolph 2,959 76.36% 618 15.95% 298 7.69% 3,875 Richmond 690 74.19% 157 16.88% 83 8.92% 930 Robeson 2,247 70.73% 665 20.93% 265 8.34% 3,177 Rockingham 1,434 74.49% 338 17.56% 153 7.95% 1,925 Rowan 2,982 76.07% 709 18.09% 229 5.84% 3,920 Rutherford 983 81.44% 155 12.84% 69 5.72% 1,207 Sampson 1,068 77.28% 235 17.00% 79 5.72% 1,382 Scotland 513 70.66% 168 23.14% 45 6.20% 726 Stanly 1,553 78.83% 302 15.33% 115 5.84% 1,970 Stokes 964 79.87% 143 11.85% 100 8.29% 1,207 Surry 1,209 80.60% 200 13.33% 91 6.07% 1,500 Swain 211 68.73% 62 20.20% 34 11.07% 307 Transylvania 369 82.00% 64 14.22% 17 3.78% 450 Tyrrell 56 80.00% 10 14.29% 4 5.71% 70 Union 5,012 81.92% 771 12.60% 334 5.46% 6,118 Vance 778 71.77% 215 19.83% 91 8.39% 1,084 Wake 22,657 79.07% 4,393 15.33% 1,604 5.60% 28,654 Warren 189 68.98% 73 26.64% 12 4.38% 274 Washington 192 71.91% 58 21.72% 17 6.37% 267 Watauga 653 71.84% 187 20.57% 69 7.59% 909 Wayne 2,054 75.18% 529 19.36% 149 5.45% 2,732 Wilkes 891 76.68% 177 15.23% 94 8.09% 1,162 Wilson 1,504 75.81% 349 17.59% 131 6.60% 1,984 Yadkin 642 79.75% 99 12.30% 64 7.95% 805 Yancey 234 78.26% 31 10.37% 34 11.37% 299
  • 15. 15 6.8.18 Appendix B The top ten stopping points where students left RDS and did not return to finish is listed by age group. These stopping points were not the same for each age group. Age Group: Under 18 The top ten stopping points cover 95.14% of the students in this age bracket. Stopping points are organized in the order in which they are asked in the Interview. The financial self-sufficiency module runs parallel to the parent and independent path questions. Once the student passes financial self-sufficiency (if needed), the student is then asked self-identifying questions as an independent and parent information is not requested. # Age Group: <18 Student stopped (DNF) – no return at these questions: Count Percentage 1 Do you claim to be a North Carolina resident? (first question) 104 5.05% 2 Confirming their address 22 1.07% 3 Military involvement 76 3.69% 4 Dependency status (independent or dependent) 1,117 54.25 5 Legal guardians (after identifying they have a legal guardian) 126 6.12% 6 Tax information 147 7.14% 7 Vehicle registration 212 10.30% 8 Driver’s license or State ID 83 4.03% 9 Employment 40 1.94% 10 Unable to prove financial self-sufficiency; chose not to continue 32 1.55% Total: 1,959 95.14% Age Group: 18-23 The top ten stopping points cover 92.26% of the students in this age bracket. Stopping points are organized in the order in which they are asked in the Interview. The financial self-sufficiency module run parallel to the parent and independent path questions. Once the student passed financial self-sufficiency (if needed), the student is then asked self-identifying questions as an independent. Parent information is not needed. # Age Group: 18-23 Student stopped (DNF) – no return at these questions: Count Percentage 1 Do you claim to be a North Carolina resident? (first question) 372 3.36% 2 Military involvement 222 2.00% 3 Dependency status (independent or dependent) 4,651 41.99% 4 Tax information 423 3.82% 5 Vehicle registration 1,344 12.13% 6 Driver’s license or State ID 357 3.22% 7 Employment 201 1.81% 8 # dependents in household (financial self-sufficiency question) 419 3.78% 9 Income (financial self-sufficiency) 1,258 11.36% 10 Unable to prove financial self-sufficiency; chose not to continue 972 8.78% Total: 10,219 92.26%
  • 16. 16 6.8.18 Age Group: 24+ The top ten stopping points cover 95.33% of the students in this age bracket. Stopping points are organized in the order in which they are asked in the Interview. Students aged 24 or older and not presented with financial self-sufficiency questions. # Age Group: 24+ Student stopped (DNF) – no return at these questions: Count Percentage 1 Do you claim to be a North Carolina resident? (first question) 398 10.69% 2 Confirming their address 60 1.61% 3 Military involvement 236 6.34% 4 Dependency status (independent or dependent) 1,020 27.40% 5 Tax information 243 6.53% 6 Vehicle registration 646 17.36% 7 Driver’s license or State ID 400 10.75% 8 Employment 270 7.25% 9 Voter registration 167 4.49% 10 Non-US citizen (if indicated as such in their profile) 108 2.90% Total: 3,548 95.33%
  • 17. 17 6.8.18 Appendix C Appendix C lists the RDS implementation schedule by date and campus. Date Campus December 5, 2016 All NC Independent and Private Colleges and Universities February 20, 2017 Appalachian State University Fayetteville State University North Carolina A&T State University North Carolina Central University North Carolina State University UNC Asheville UNC Chapel Hill UNC Charlotte UNC Pembroke UNC Wilmington Western Carolina University Randolph CC February 22, 2017 UNC Greensboro UNC School of Arts February 23, 2017 Winston-Salem State University February 27, 2017 Elizabeth City State University March 2, 2017 East Carolina University March 13, 2017 Alamance CC Central Piedmont CC Forsyth Technical CC Guilford Technical CC May 7, 2017 Bladen CC Cape Fear CC College of the Albemarle Davidson County CC Durham Technical CC McDowell Technical CC Roanoke-Chowan CC Rowan-Cabarrus CC Sampson CC Stanly CC June 26, 2017 Cleveland CC Fayetteville Technical CC Halifax CC Martin CC Mayland CC Mitchell CC Montgomery CC Pamlico CC Piedmont CC Southeastern CC Tri-County CC
  • 18. 18 6.8.18 Date Campus September 6, 2017 Caldwell CC and Technical Institute Central Carolina CC Coastal Carolina CC Haywood CC Isothermal CC Johnston CC Nash CC Pitt CC Richmond CC Wayne CC Wilson CC September 18, 2017 Brunswick CC Edgecombe CC James Sprunt CC Robeson CC Rockingham CC Surry CC Vance-Granville CC Wake Tech CC Western Piedmont CC Wilkes CC October 2, 2017 AB Technical CC Beaufort CC Blue Ridge CC Carteret CC Catawba CC Craven CC Gaston CC Lenoir CC Sandhills CC South Piedmont CC