The Control, Regulate, and Tax Adult Use of Marijuana Act (AUMA) presents a myriad of land use and environmental issues that will affect cultivators, distributors and other private entities and public agencies. Those issues touch on existing environmental and land use laws as well as new regulations that will be developed at the local and state levels. With regard to land use, AUMA allows local agencies to develop planning and zoning regulations. These regulations will address whether to allow such businesses, where such businesses may locate, and conditions for operating such businesses. The development of these regulations and approval of local permits, and State licensing procedures, are all subject to CEQA.
Further, there is a web of environmental regulations, both existing and soon to be developed, that must be considered and complied with by cultivators, distributors and other private entities and public agencies. Those regulations include water use and water rights, wastewater and wetlands permitting, species protection, and pesticide use, under federal, state, and local laws, including the Clean Water Act, Endangered Species Act, and California Fish and Game and Water Codes.
This webinar focuses on what municipalities can and cannot do through their land use powers to regulate nonmedical marijuana businesses, and strategies that private businesses and local governments can use in the coming months while the State crafts new regulations. The webinar also addresses the complex interplay of federal, state, and local environmental regulations that will affect this new industry.
2. 2
• Overview of Land Use Hierarchy
– General Plan
– Specific or Area Plans
– Zoning Code
– Conditional Use Permits
Land Use – Local Regulation and Strategies
Scope: Broadest
Most
Specific
Change: Hardest Easiest
3. 3
• Local agencies have broad land use authority
– AUMA does little to change that
• What local agencies cannot regulate is narrow:
– Personal possession, processing, transport,
purchasing or giving away (21 and over)
– Personal use in a private residence (21 and over)
– Transport of marijuana or marijuana products
using public roads
– Cultivation of up to 6 plants per residence
(subject to “reasonable” local regulations)
Land Use – Local Regulation and Strategies
4. 4
• What local agencies can regulate is broad
– Everything else
Land Use – Local Regulation and Strategies
6. 6
• Make sure you are regulating
everything you want to regulate
– Multiple types of cultivation
(not just indoor/outdoor)
– Manufacturing, testing, retail,
distribution, and microbusiness
– Marijuana products and
marijuana paraphernalia
Local Agency Strategies
7. 7
• Many different types of
regulations available
– Complete bans
– Limiting uses to specific
zoning districts
– Requiring conditional use permits
– Increasing types of sensitive uses
or distance from sensitive uses
from that in AUMA
– Operational restrictions
Local Agency Strategies
8. 8
• Dangers of not specifically
regulating specific types
of marijuana businesses
• Beware reliance on
“permissive zoning”
– Generally, if not specifically
permitted, it is not allowed
– But – Silence by local regulations
may lead to issuance of State
licenses anyway
Local Agency Strategies
9. 9
• Can create confusion – What’s the difference?
Local Agency Strategies
10. 10
• If your jurisdiction is going to allow uses, beware
“overconcentration” issue
– Much like ABC licenses
– Achieving a balance between prohibiting uses
and creating pockets of heavily concentrated uses
Local Agency Strategies
11. 11
• Moratoria
– Gov’t Code 65858 allows local agencies to put a
temporary halt on types of development while the
agency considered permanent regulations
Local Agency Strategies
Initial 45-day period
plus two extensions
for up to a total of
two years
Must be working
towards permanent
regulations
12. 12
Business Strategies
Know where
you want to
operate
Monitor what actions
the local agency is
taking, or may already
have taken Participate
in the process
Be aware of planning
hierarchy when planning
your project
Show up, make your voice
heard when local agencies are
considering new temporary or
permanent regulations
13. 13
• Zoning regulations are not permanent
– They can be changed at the
discretion of the local agency
Business Strategies
14. 14
• Consider a Development Agreement
(Gov’t Code 65864)
– Allows for certainty in development (vested right)
– Allows agencies to test the waters with certain
types of uses
– Avoids constitutional “nexus” standard for
conditions and allows public benefit requirements
– Drawback – must be approved by an ordinance
which is subject to referendum
Strategies for Both
15. 15
• Consider/promote alternatives between
no uses and fully allowed uses
Specific standards for
marijuana businesses
Strategic use of
overlay zoning
Strategies for Both
16. 16
• Don’t forget about CEQA!
– Development of new zoning and regulations
are subject to CEQA
– Specific project approvals are subject to CEQA
CEQA
17. 17
• Marijuana businesses will create unique impacts
for consideration in CEQA documents
– Water use
– Odor
– Hazardous Substances
– Energy Use
– Traffic/Parking
– Public Safety
CEQA
18. 18
• Nonmedical marijuana “unregulated” without any
environmental protections
– 40 years of environmental laws currently apply
• Requires state agencies to develop environmental
regulations and coordinate/consult with each other
• Requires compliance with environmental laws as a
condition of licensure
• Tax revenues will help address environmental
impacts
Proposition 64
19. 19
• Water supply
– Water diversion
• Water quality
– Polluted runoff from pesticides,
erosion, other chemicals and wastes
• Soil
– Improper use and storage of petroleum
products and chemicals
• Species and habitat
– Land development, tree removal,
water diversion, water pollution
• Carbon footprint
– Electricity usage
Environmental Impacts
20. 20
If marijuana cultivation is not prohibited in your area:
County grading permits
Erosion control plans
Existing Law: Local Requirements
21. 21
State Water Resources Control Board Division of Water Rights
– Water right to legally divert water
– Riparian, appropriative, and prescriptive rights
– Application for water right permits/licenses
– Permits from other agencies may also be required before
allowed to divert water
Prop 64: Applicants for cultivation license must identify
source(s) of water that will be used and certify legal right
to use water under state law (Business and Professions Code § 26056(c))
Existing Law: Water Supply
22. 22
• State Water Resources Control Board
• Regional Water Quality Control Boards
– NPDES permits (e.g. storm water)
– Waste discharge requirements (WDRs)
– Conditional waiver of WDRs / water quality
certification
Existing Law: Water Quality
23. 23
• 2 current permits regulate discharges from
cultivation
– Region 1 (North Coast): conditional waiver; both
medical and recreational
– Region 5 (Central Valley): WDRs; medical only
– Tiered framework based on threat to water quality
– Best management practices
• U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
– 404 permit to dredge/fill wetlands
Existing Law: Water Quality
24. 24
• U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
– Endangered Species Act
• Consultation + Incidental Take Permit
and Habitat Conservation Plan
• California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW)
– California Endangered Species Act
• Consultation + Incidental Take Permit
– Pollution prohibitions
– Lake or Streambed Alteration Agreement
• California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection
(CalFIRE)
– Timberland conversion permit
Existing Law: Species and Habitat
25. 25
• Federal Insecticide Fungicide and Rodenticide Act
(FIFRA)
• Federal Food Drug and Cosmetic Act
• California Law - No pesticides allowed unless:
Existing Laws: Pesticides
AND
Either
(a) exempt from
registration requirements;
OR
(b) registered for a use that
is broad enough to include
use on marijuana
Exempt from residue
tolerance requirements
26. 26
Additional Laws on the Horizon
Water Code § 13276 - Water Boards may adopt permits that address:
– Site development and maintenance, erosion control, and drainage features
– Stream crossing installation and maintenance
– Riparian and wetland protection and management
– Soil disposal
– Water storage and use
– Irrigation runoff
– Fertilizers and soil
– Pesticides and herbicides
– Petroleum products and other chemicals
– Cultivation-related waste
– Refuse and human waste
– Cleanup, restoration, and mitigation
27. 27
Additional Laws on the Horizon
• Department of Fish and Wildlife
– May develop regulations for interim
flows associated with marijuana cultivation
• Department of Food and Agriculture
– Required to include conditions in each cultivation
license requested by CDFW and SWRCB
– May develop regulations that address environmental
impacts of cultivation
• Department of Pesticide Regulation
– Consult with Department of Food and Agriculture to develop
standards for pesticide use in cultivation
– Consult with SWRCB to develop regulations that require that
application of pesticides or other pest control meet standards of
Food and Agricultural Code
28. 28
Other Issues
• Many levels of coordination
among many state agencies
• Intersection with medical
marijuana
• Enforcement
• New administration
Minimum of 19 types of licenses (may be more)
Licenses are issued for 1 year and renewed annually.
Type 5, 5A, 5B cultivation may not be issued until after 1/1/23 (2061(d))
A temporary license can also be granted for a period of 12 months until January 1, 2019
26053-Can only hold one type of license for each activity (except testing) but must have separate licenses for each of the premises (26055(c))
26054-A licensee cannot also be licensed as a retailer of alcoholic beverages/license will not be issued to a business located within 600 feet of school, day care center, youth center, unless a licensing authority or local jurisdiction specifies a different radius.
26054.1 –licensee must show continuous California residency from and before 1/1/15
26054.2-priority to applicants who can show operation in compliance with CUA before 9/1/16. Local jurisdiction may be asked to identify potential applicants operating in compliance with CUA
26057- License may be denied if applicant, officers, directors or owners has been sanctioned by a licensing authority or city and county for unauthorized commercial marijuana activities or commercial medical cannabis activities, has had a license revoked in the last three years or has been sanctioned by the Department of F&G.
Exponential growth of cultivated land, if left unregulated, results in significant environmental impacts
“Unregulated” is a misnomer. Already 40 years of existing environmental laws that all apply. Prop 64 sets the stage for a new layer of environmental laws. Can’t just look at what is coming down the road.
Stage agencies: DFA, SWRCB, DFW, Cal FIRE
Several new sections B&P Code indicate that compliance with environmental laws is a condition of obtaining and maintaining a license. § 26051(a)(6) and § 26057: Licensing authority may deny application for licensure if fail to comply with an requirement to protect natural resources, including but not limited to protections for instream flow and water quality or if could result in violations of any environmental protection laws.
Licensed cultivators must comply with license conditions § 26060 and applicable law § 26066
Diversion – cultivation requires significant quantities of water. Illegal diversions reduce stream flows, harm fisheries, other wildlife and other beneficial uses dependent on the water, can interfere with senior water right holders downstream
Polluted runoff – Causes water quality degradation. Discharges of sediment from moving earth like grading, excavating, building roads, overapplication of fertilizers, herbicides, other toxic substances etc., spills from petroleum products associated with pumps and cultivation equipment. Pesticides are easily mobilized by storm water, making it especially important to keep them away from water bodies.
Species/habitat – no secret that developing and clearing land destroys wildlife and wildlife habitat. Also, reduced stream flows and polluted waters from fertilizers and other chemiclas may resultin fish kills.
Carbon footprint – indoor cultivation is very energy-intensive. Because of it previously being deemed illegal, growers were using inefficient off-grid gasoline and diesel generators. Connecting to the grid will help because utilities have energy conservation programs and use a mix of renewable energy sources. But still, a large percentage of energy mix is still based upon burning fossil fuels.
Threshold question: Does your city, county, and zone allow for cannabis cultivation? As Ed discussed, each city and county has planning and zoning rules which regulate land use. Nearly all counties require a grading permit to control erosion and sedimentation, prevent damage to watercourses, etc. Most county grading permits require an erosion control plan
If you plan to divert or take water from any surface water body (i.e. lake, river, stream, or creek) the California Water Code requires that you have a water right.
A water right is legal permission to use a reasonable amount of water for a beneficial purpose.
If not riparian or pre-1914 appropriative, must apply for water right permit
Use of water without a water right is a trespass against the State and can lead to fines of up to $500 per day.
New water right permits are granted only where there is a reasonable likelihood that water is available in the given watershed.
NPDES and waste discharge requirements apply to small and large operations
SB 837 is a trailer bill that includes cleanup language for bills that established the Medical Cannabis Regulation and Safety Act. Requires the State Water Board, in consultation with CDFW and CDFA to ensure that individual and cumulative effects of water diversion and discharge associated with cannabis cultivation do not affect instream flows needed for fish spawning, migration and rearing, and flows needed to maintain natural flow variability (B&P 19332(d)). See also Water Code 13149 – requires State Water Board to adopt principles and guidelines for diversion and use of water for cannabis cultivation in areas where cultivation may have potential to substantially affect instream flows. May include requirements that apply to groundwater extractions.
Note that Region 5 views marijuana as an agricultural activity and therefore exempt from CGP.
NPDES and waste discharge requirements apply to small and large operations
SB 837 is a trailer bill that includes cleanup language for bills that established the Medical Cannabis Regulation and Safety Act. Requires the State Water Board, in consultation with CDFW and CDFA to ensure that individual and cumulative effects of water diversion and discharge associated with cannabis cultivation do not affect instream flows needed for fish spawning, migration and rearing, and flows needed to maintain natural flow variability (B&P 19332(d)). See also Water Code 13149 – requires State Water Board to adopt principles and guidelines for diversion and use of water for cannabis cultivation in areas where cultivation may have potential to substantially affect instream flows. May include requirements that apply to groundwater extractions.
Note that Region 5 views marijuana as an agricultural activity and therefore exempt from CGP.
Fish and Game Code §§ 5650, 5652 Pollution prohibitions
Fish and Game Code 1602 requires an entity to notify CDFW prior to commencing any activity that may substantially divert or obstruct the natural flow of any river, stream or lake; substantially change or use any material from the bed, channel or bank of any river, stream or lake; or deposit or dispose of debris, waste or other materials where it may pass into any river, stream or lake. A Lake or Streambed Alteration Agreement is required if CDFW deems potential substantial adverse effects. LSA includes measures necessary to protect existing fish and wildlife resources.
Pesticide use in the U.S. is governed by the Federal Insecticide Fungicide and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA), which establishes a goal of preventing “unreasonable adverse effects from pesticide use. FIFRA is implemented in coordination with FDCA, which establishes tolerance limits for allowable pesticide residues on specific corps, unless the agency determines the pesticide is excempt from a tolerance limit.
Agricultural products in interstate commerce containing pesticide residues must be covered by pesticide tolerances.
At the present time, there are no pesticides or herbicides registered specifically for use directly on cannabis and the use of pesticides on cannabis plants has not been reviewed for safety, human health effects, or
environmental impacts. Under California law, the only pesticide products not illegal to use on cannabis are those that contain an active ingredient that is exempt from residue tolerance requirements and either exempt from registration requirements as a minimum risk pesticide under FIFRA section 25(b) and California Code of Regulations, title 3, section 6147 or registered and labeled for a broad enough use to include use on marijuana
In addition to the need to comply with existing laws:
Next iteration of Region 5 WDR
Statewide WDR?
Other Regional Board WDRs?
Conditions to ensure that water diversion and discharge associated with cultivation do not affect instream flows needed for fish spawning, migration, and rearing, and the flows needed to maintain natural flow variability, and to otherwise protect fish, wildlife, habitat, water quality (B&P 26060)
DFA may promulgate regs to implement B&P 26067(c) – unique identification program for marijuana
At present, there are no pesticides or herbicides registered for use directly on cannabis – use of pesticides on cannabis has not been reviewed for safety, human health effects, or enviro impacts. Under California law, the only pesticide products not illegal to use on cannabis are those that contain an active ingredient that is exempt from residue tolerance requirements and either registered and labeled for a broad enough use to include use on cannabis or exempt from registration requirements as a minimum risk pesticide under FIFRA section 25(b) and 3 CCR 6147
Progressive enforcement: from informal to very formal depending on extent of violations, history of noncompliance and other factors.