Local Therapies for UvealLocal Therapies for Uveal
Melanoma Liver MetastasesMelanoma Liver Metastases
Interventional Radiology and
Image-guided Medicine
Emory University Hospital, Emory University Hospital Midtown,
Emory St. Joseph’s Hospital, Children’s at Egleston, Grady
Memorial Hospital
WINSHIP CANCER INSTITUTE
Darren Kies, MD
Assistant Professor of Radiology
Division of Interventional Radiology &
Image-Guided Medicine
Director of Interventional Radiology
Services at Emory University Hospital
No Disclosures
Objectives
• Understand the concept of liver directed therapy
• Understand the difference between percutaneous
ablation and catheter directed liver therapy
• Discuss the role of percutaneous ablation in uveal
melanoma
• Discuss the role of catheter-directed liver therapy in
uveal melanoma
What is Liver Directed
Therapy?
• Oncologic treatment targeted
solely at liver metastases
– Minimally invasive
– Tolerable side effects
– Fast recovery
– Relatively low risk
Why is Liver Directed Therapy
Helpful?
• Liver is a vital organ
• Liver metastases will ultimately
lead to liver failure
• Systemic therapies are limited in
uveal melanoma
• Controlling liver metastases can
improve survival in certain
cancers, particularly uveal
melanoma
Who Should Get Liver
Directed Therapy?
• Patients with liver dominant metastatic disease
– Primary tumor is known to respond to liver directed
therapy
– Primary is removed or is under control
– Low burden or no metastatic disease outside the liver
– Liver involvement < 70% with metastatic disease
CurativeCurative PalliativePalliative
Percutaneous Ablation
• Minimally invasive method of killing focal tumors in the
liver with either heat or cold
– Size matters
– Location matters
– Extent of disease matters – limited role in uveal
melanoma
• Heat vs. Cold
– Operator experience is key
• Success Rate
– Local control: 85-95%
Case Example
Catheter Directed Therapy
Catheter Directed Therapy
• Transarterial Chemoembolization (TACE)
– Chemotherapy + embolic particles
– Chemotherapy in the embolic particle
• Transarterial Radioembolization (TARE) – Yttrium 90
(Y90) – Selective Internal Radiation Therapy (SIRT)
– Resin Microspheres
– Glass Microspheres
• Immunoembolization
– GM-CSF Embolization
TACE
• First performed in the early 1980’s
• Targeted intra-arterial delivery of
chemotherapy followed by an embolic
agent
• Drugs: No standard
– BCNU
– Cisplatin
– Mitomycin C
• Embolic agent
– Prevents drug washout
– Induce ischemic necrosis
+ Lipiodol
PVAGelfoam
hydrogel
PVA Embospheres
TACE Outcomes
Semin Intervent Radiol. 2013 Mar; 30(1): 39–48.
Radioembolization/Y90
Case Example
Case Example
Case Example
• Retrospective study
• 13 patients treated with resin-based yttirum-90
• PR or SD in 77%
• OS 7 months
• Retrospective study
• 32 patients treated with resin-
based yttirum-90
• OS 10 month
• PFS Liver 4.7 months
• Less tumor burden = better
survival
Immunoembolization
• Infusion of immunologic stimulant into liver followed by
embolization
• Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-
CSF)
– Protein secreted by immune cells that stimulates
immune activity
• Immunoembolization w/ GM-CSF vs. Bland Embolization
• OS: 21.5 vs. 17.2 months
– Pt with greater tumor burden had better response
• Pro-inflammatory cytokine production was greater with
IE
Conclusions
• Much more work is needed
• Liver-directed therapy may improve survival
• Liver-directed therapy may be the only reasonable
treatment option for selected patients
How Do I Access Liver
Directed Therapy?
• Talk to your oncologist
– NCI Designated Cancer Centers
– Tumor Board with Multiple Specialists
• Seek out an Interventional Oncologist
– http://doctor-finder.sirweb.org

Local Therapies for Uveal Melanoma Liver Metastases

  • 1.
    Local Therapies forUvealLocal Therapies for Uveal Melanoma Liver MetastasesMelanoma Liver Metastases Interventional Radiology and Image-guided Medicine Emory University Hospital, Emory University Hospital Midtown, Emory St. Joseph’s Hospital, Children’s at Egleston, Grady Memorial Hospital WINSHIP CANCER INSTITUTE Darren Kies, MD Assistant Professor of Radiology Division of Interventional Radiology & Image-Guided Medicine Director of Interventional Radiology Services at Emory University Hospital
  • 2.
  • 3.
    Objectives • Understand theconcept of liver directed therapy • Understand the difference between percutaneous ablation and catheter directed liver therapy • Discuss the role of percutaneous ablation in uveal melanoma • Discuss the role of catheter-directed liver therapy in uveal melanoma
  • 4.
    What is LiverDirected Therapy? • Oncologic treatment targeted solely at liver metastases – Minimally invasive – Tolerable side effects – Fast recovery – Relatively low risk
  • 5.
    Why is LiverDirected Therapy Helpful? • Liver is a vital organ • Liver metastases will ultimately lead to liver failure • Systemic therapies are limited in uveal melanoma • Controlling liver metastases can improve survival in certain cancers, particularly uveal melanoma
  • 6.
    Who Should GetLiver Directed Therapy? • Patients with liver dominant metastatic disease – Primary tumor is known to respond to liver directed therapy – Primary is removed or is under control – Low burden or no metastatic disease outside the liver – Liver involvement < 70% with metastatic disease
  • 7.
  • 8.
    Percutaneous Ablation • Minimallyinvasive method of killing focal tumors in the liver with either heat or cold – Size matters – Location matters – Extent of disease matters – limited role in uveal melanoma • Heat vs. Cold – Operator experience is key • Success Rate – Local control: 85-95%
  • 9.
  • 12.
  • 13.
    Catheter Directed Therapy •Transarterial Chemoembolization (TACE) – Chemotherapy + embolic particles – Chemotherapy in the embolic particle • Transarterial Radioembolization (TARE) – Yttrium 90 (Y90) – Selective Internal Radiation Therapy (SIRT) – Resin Microspheres – Glass Microspheres • Immunoembolization – GM-CSF Embolization
  • 14.
    TACE • First performedin the early 1980’s • Targeted intra-arterial delivery of chemotherapy followed by an embolic agent • Drugs: No standard – BCNU – Cisplatin – Mitomycin C • Embolic agent – Prevents drug washout – Induce ischemic necrosis + Lipiodol PVAGelfoam hydrogel PVA Embospheres
  • 15.
    TACE Outcomes Semin InterventRadiol. 2013 Mar; 30(1): 39–48.
  • 16.
  • 17.
  • 18.
  • 19.
  • 20.
    • Retrospective study •13 patients treated with resin-based yttirum-90 • PR or SD in 77% • OS 7 months • Retrospective study • 32 patients treated with resin- based yttirum-90 • OS 10 month • PFS Liver 4.7 months • Less tumor burden = better survival
  • 21.
    Immunoembolization • Infusion ofimmunologic stimulant into liver followed by embolization • Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM- CSF) – Protein secreted by immune cells that stimulates immune activity
  • 22.
    • Immunoembolization w/GM-CSF vs. Bland Embolization • OS: 21.5 vs. 17.2 months – Pt with greater tumor burden had better response • Pro-inflammatory cytokine production was greater with IE
  • 23.
    Conclusions • Much morework is needed • Liver-directed therapy may improve survival • Liver-directed therapy may be the only reasonable treatment option for selected patients
  • 24.
    How Do IAccess Liver Directed Therapy? • Talk to your oncologist – NCI Designated Cancer Centers – Tumor Board with Multiple Specialists • Seek out an Interventional Oncologist – http://doctor-finder.sirweb.org