SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 46
Download to read offline
City Study
2021:
HOUSTON
Table of Contents
01 R E PO RT O V E R V IE W
• A bout T he C ity Studies P roject
• Sectors of Schools
• Research Question and A nalyses
• M easure of A cademic Performance
Student Subgroup Analysis
Summary of Findings
03 A PPE N DIX E S
• A cknowledgments
• T ypes of C harter Schools
• M ethods
• Days of Learning
• Full Set of Findings
02 R E S E A R C H
F IN DIN G S
• Reading & M ath
Overall Houston Results
Sector Analysis
• vs. state & comparison
within Houston
Charter Subsector Analysis
• Reading
• M ath
School-Level Performance by Sector
Research Findings Cont’d.
Black Students
• all vs. state
• vs. state by sector &
comparison within Houston
Hispanic Students
• all vs. state
• vs. state by sector &
comparison within Houston
Students in Poverty
• all vs. state
• vs. state by sector &
comparison within Houston
ELL Students
• all vs. state
• vs. state by sector &
comparison within Houston
Special Ed Students
• all vs. state
• vs. state by sector &
comparison within Houston
Male Students
• all vs. state
• vs. state by sector &
comparison within Houston
Female Students
• all vs. state
• vs. state by sector &
comparison within Houston
• Reading
• M ath
REPORT OVERVIEW
01
About The City Studies Project
Cohort 1 Cohort 2
The City Studies project examines the performance of schools in select U.S. cities,
including Houston. We study the academic progress of students as the measure of school
performance.
O
O
C
C
C
CHARTER SCHOOLS
Public schools operated independently from the
traditional school district, with autonomy in adapting
school designs and held accountable for education
results.
C harter M anagement Organizations (CMOs)
O rganizations holding the charter and overseeing the
operation of at least three charter schools.
Independent C harter Schools
O rganizations holding the charter and overseeing the
operation of a single or two charter schools.
SELECTIVE MAGNET SCHOOLS
District-run schools with focused themes and
academically selective admission.
OTHER DISTRICT-RUN SCHOOLS
Public schools not belonging to any of above two types.
C
Sectors of Schools
COMMUNITIES MA Y HA VE UP TO THREE S ECTORS OF S CHOOLS
Research Question and Analyses
IN THIS REPORT WE EXAMINE ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE IN
HOUSTON USING DATA FROM THE SCHOOL YEARS 2013-14
THROUGH 2017-18. THERE ARE THREE LEVELS OF ANALYSIS.
Ov e rall performance in
Houston schools over
three years.
• The performance of Houston
students is benchmarked against the
state average performance,
accounting for student
characteristics.
• The performance of charter school
students and the performance of
magnet school students within
Houston are then compared to that
of similar traditional public school
(district school) students within
Houston.
Pe rformance for charter
schools, magnet
schools and the rest of
Houston Public schools
over three years
Performance in the 2017-
2018 school year by
school type, race,
pov erty status, English
language learner (ELL)
sta tus, special
e ducation status a nd
ge nder.
WE MAKE TWO SETS
OF COMPARISONS.
01 02 03
Achievement scores capture what a student knows at a point
in time. They are influenced by students’ prior conditions in
addition to schools’ contributions.
Growth scores indicate how much progress a student makes
from one year to the next. Growth scores allow us to zero in
on the contributions of schools separately from other factors
that affect point-in-time scores.
ACHIEVEMENT VS. GROWTH
We analyze student growth in standard deviation units so
that the results can be assessed for statistical differences.
The full set of findings appear in the Appendix.
In the following graphs of findings, we transform growth
from standard deviation units into days of learning based on
a typical 180-day school year.
IN THIS STUDY WE MEASURE
ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE AS HOW
MUCH GROWTH STUDENTS MAKE FROM
ONE YEAR TO THE NEXT
Measure of Academic Performance
RESEARCH FINDINGS
02
-125
-100
-75
-50
-25
0
25
50
75
100
125
SY 2015-2016 SY 2016-2017 SY 2017-2018
Growth
(in
Days
of
Learning)
significantly different at p< 0.05
reading math
Research Findings > Overall Houston Results
> Reading & Math
Average One-Year Learning Gains for All Houston
Students Compared to the State Average Learning
Gains, by Year and Subject
-75
-50
-25
0
25
50
75
100
125
150
175
SY 2015-2016 SY 2016-2017 SY 2017-2018
Growth
(in
Days
of
Learning)
Learning Gains in Reading for Students in Houston
Charter Schools, Houston Magnet Schools, and
Houston District Schools Compared to the State
Average Learning Gains, by Year
significantly different at p< 0.05
charter magnet
Research Findings > Sector Analysis
> Reading
VS. STATE & COMPARISON WITHIN HOUSTON
charter magnet district
Reading
Charter vs. District
Magnet vs. District
Charter vs. Magnet
'15-'16 '16-'17 '17-'18
Tests of Differences
-75
-50
-25
0
25
50
75
100
125
150
175
SY 2015-2016 SY 2016-2017 SY 2017-2018
Growth
(in
Days
of
Learning)
Learning Gains in Math for Students in Houston
Charter Schools, Houston Magnet Schools, and
Houston District Schools Compared to the State
Average Learning Gains, by Year
significantly different at p< 0.05
charter magnet district
Research Findings > Sector Analysis
> Math
VS. STATE & COMPARISON WITHIN HOUSTON
Math
Charter vs. District
Magnet vs. District
Charter vs. Magnet
Tests of Differences
'15-'16 '16-'17 '17-'18
-75
-50
-25
0
25
50
75
100
125
150
175
CMO Charter Schools Independent Charter Schools
Growth
(in
Days
of
Learning)
Relative Learning Gains for Students in Houston CMO-
Affiliated Charter Schools and Independent Houston
Charter Schools Compared to the Average Learning
Gains for All Student in the State, by Subject
significantly different at p< 0.05
reading math
Research Findings > Charter Subsector Analysis
> vs. state & comparison within Houston
Reading
CMOs vs Independent Charter Schools
Math
CMOs vs Independent Charter Schools
sig
Tests of Differences
-400 -300 -200 -100 0 100 200 300 400 500
Growth (in Daysof Learning)
Charter
District
Magnet
Research Findings > School-Level Performance by Sector
> Reading
-400 -300 -200 -100 0 100 200 300 400 500
Growth (in Daysof Learning)
Charter
District
Magnet
Research Findings > School-Level Performance by Sector
>Math
-100
-75
-50
-25
0
25
50
75
100
125
150
Houston Black Students
Growth
(in
Days
of
Learning)
Learning Gains for All Houston Black Students
Compared to the Average Learning Gains of Black
Students Statewide, by Subject
significantly different at p< 0.05
reading math
Research Findings > Student Subgroup Analysis
> Black Students
ALL VS. STATE
-100
-75
-50
-25
0
25
50
75
100
125
150
Houston Charter
Black Students
Houston Magnet
Black Students
Houston District
Black Students
Growth
(in
Days
of
Learning)
Learning Gains for Black Students in Houston Charter
Schools, Black Students in Houston Magnet Schools,
and Black Students in Houston District Schools
Compared to the Average Learning Gains of Black
Students Statewide, by Subject
significantly different at p< 0.05
reading math
Research Findings > Student Subgroup Analysis
> Black Students
VS. STATE BY SECTOR & COMPARISON WITHIN HOUSTON
Reading
Charter Black vs. District Black
Magnet Black vs. District Black
Math
Charter Black vs. District Black
Magnet Black vs. District Black
Tests of Differences
sig
-100
-75
-50
-25
0
25
50
75
100
125
150
Houston Hispanic Students
Growth
(in
Days
of
Learning)
Learning Gains for All Houston Hispanic Students
Compared to the Average Learning Gains of Hispanic
Students Statewide, by Subject
significantly different at p< 0.05
reading math
Research Findings > Student Subgroup Analysis
> Hispanic Students
ALL VS. STATE
-100
-75
-50
-25
0
25
50
75
100
125
150
Houston Charter
Hispanic Students
Houston Magnet
Hispanic Students
Houston District
Hispanic Students
Growth
(in
Days
of
Learning)
Learning Gains for Hispanic Students in Houston Charter
Schools, Hispanic Students in Houston Magnet Schools, and
Hispanic Students in Houston District Schools Compared to
the Average Learning Gains of Hispanic Students
Statewide, by Subject
significantly different at p< 0.05
reading math
Research Findings > Student Subgroup Analysis
> Hispanic Students
VS. STATE BY SECTOR & COMPARISON WITHIN HOUSTON
Reading
Charter Hispanic vs. District Hispanic
Magnet Hispanic vs. District Hispanic
Math
Charter Hispanic vs. District Hispanic
Magnet Hispanic vs. District Hispanic
Tests of Differences
sig
-100
-75
-50
-25
0
25
50
75
100
125
150
Houston Students in Poverty
Growth
(in
Days
of
Learning)
Learning Gains for All Houston Students in Poverty
Compared to the Average Learning Gains of Students
in Poverty Statewide, by Subject
significantly different at p< 0.05
reading math
Research Findings > Student Subgroup Analysis
> Students in Poverty
ALL VS. STATE
-100
-75
-50
-25
0
25
50
75
100
125
150
Houston Charter
Students in Poverty
Houston Magnet
Students in Poverty
Houston District
Students in Poverty
Growth
(in
Days
of
Learning)
Learning Gains for Houston Charter School Students
in Poverty, Houston Magnet School Students in
Poverty, and Houston District School Students in
Poverty Compared to the Average Learning Gains of
Students in Poverty Statewide, by Subject
significantly different at p< 0.05
reading math
Research Findings > Student Subgroup Analysis
> Students in Poverty
VS. STATE BY SECTOR & COMPARISON WITHIN HOUSTON
Reading
Charter Poverty vs. District Poverty
Magnet Poverty vs. District Poverty
Math
Charter Poverty vs. District Poverty
Magnet Poverty vs. District Poverty
Tests of Differences
sig
-125
-100
-75
-50
-25
0
25
50
75
100
125
Houston ELL Students
Growth
(in
Days
of
Learning)
Learning Gains for All ELL Students in Houston
Compared to the Average Learning Gains of ELL
Students Statewide, by Subject
significantly different at p< 0.05
reading math
Research Findings > Student Subgroup Analysis
> ELL Students
ALL VS. STATE
-125
-100
-75
-50
-25
0
25
50
75
100
125
Houston Charter
ELL Students
Houston Magnet
ELL Students
Houston District
ELL Students
Growth
(in
Days
of
Learning)
Learning Gains for ELL Students in Houston Charter
Schools, ELL Students in Houston Magnet Schools,
and ELL Students in Houston District Schools
Compared to the Average Learning Gains of ELL
Students Statewide, by Subject
significantly different at p< 0.05
reading math
Research Findings > Student Subgroup Analysis
> ELL Students
VS. STATE BY SECTOR & COMPARISON WITHIN HOUSTON
Reading
Charter ELL vs. District ELL
Magnet ELL vs. District ELL
Math
Charter ELL vs. District ELL
Magnet ELL vs. District ELL
Tests of Differences
sig
-125
-100
-75
-50
-25
0
25
50
75
100
125
Houston Special Ed Students
Growth
(in
Days
of
Learning)
Learning Gains for All Houston Students in Special
Education Compared to the Average Learning Gains of
Students in Special Education Statewide, by Subject
significantly different at p< 0.05
reading math
Research Findings > Student Subgroup Analysis
> Special Ed Students
ALL VS. STATE
-125
-100
-75
-50
-25
0
25
50
75
100
125
Houston Charter
Students in Special Ed.
Houston Magnet
Students in Special Ed.
Houston District
Students in Special Ed.
Growth
(in
Days
of
Learning)
Learning Gains for Houston Charter School Students
in Special Ed., Houston Magnet School Students in
Special Ed., and Houston District School Students in
Special Ed. Compared to the Average Learning Gains
of Students in Special Ed. Statewide, by Subject
significantly different at p< 0.05
reading math
Research Findings > Student Subgroup Analysis
> Special Ed Students
VS. STATE BY SECTOR & COMPARISON WITHIN HOUSTON
Reading
Charter Sped vs. District Sped
Magnet Sped vs. District Sped
Math
Charter Sped vs. District Sped
Magnet Sped vs. District Sped
Tests of Differences
sig
-100
-75
-50
-25
0
25
50
75
100
125
150
Houston Male Students
Growth
(in
Days
of
Learning)
Learning Gains for All Houston Male Students
Compared to the Average Learning Gains of Male
Students Statewide, by Subject
significantly different at p< 0.05
reading math
Research Findings > Student Subgroup Analysis
> Male Students
ALL VS. STATE
-100
-75
-50
-25
0
25
50
75
100
125
150
Houston Charter
Male Students
Houston Magnet
Male Students
Houston District
Male Students
Growth
(in
Days
of
Learning)
Learning Gains for Male Students in Houston Charter
Schools, Male Students in Houston Magnet Schools,
and Male Students in Houston District Schools
Compared to the Average Learning Gains of Male
Students Statewide, by Subject
significantly different at p< 0.05
reading math
Research Findings > Student Subgroup Analysis
> Male Students
VS. STATE BY SECTOR & COMPARISON WITHIN HOUSTON
Reading
Charter Male vs. District Male
Magnet Male vs. District Male
Math
Charter Male vs. District Male
Magnet Male vs. District Male
Tests of Differences
sig
Reading
Charter Male vs. District Male
Magnet Male vs. District Male
Math
Charter Male vs. District Male
Magnet Male vs. District Male
Tests of Differences
sig
-100
-75
-50
-25
0
25
50
75
100
125
150
Houston Female Students
Growth
(in
Days
of
Learning)
Learning Gains for All Houston Female Students
Compared to the Average Learning Gains of Female
Students Statewide, by Subject
significantly different at p< 0.05
reading math
Research Findings > Student Subgroup Analysis
> Female Students
ALL VS. STATE
-100
-75
-50
-25
0
25
50
75
100
125
150
Houston Charter
Female Students
Houston Magnet
Female Students
Houston District
Female Students
Growth
(in
Days
of
Learning)
Learning Gains for Female Students in Houston Charter
Schools, Female Students in Houston Magnet Schools, and
Female Students in Houston District Schools Compared to
the Average Learning Gains of Female Students Statewide,
by Subject
significantly different at p< 0.05
reading math
Research Findings > Student Subgroup Analysis
> Female Students
VS. STATE BY SECTOR & COMPARISON WITHIN HOUSTON
Reading
Charter Female vs. District Female
Magnet Female vs. District Female
Math
Charter Female vs. District Female
Magnet Female vs. District Female
Tests of Differences
sig
Summary of Findings
The summary of the findings from the analysis of Houston schools is presented here.
APPENDIXES
03
Acknowledgments
Texas Education
Agency, Texas Schools
Project, and Texas
Higher Education
Advisory Board provided
supports in the acquisition
of student-level data.
The Houston
Independent School
District assisted CREDO
with identifying selective
magnet schools in
Houston.
Good Reason Houston
assisted CREDO with
verifying the list of public
schools in Houston.
Disclaimer: The conclusions of this research do not necessarily reflect the opinions or official position of the Texas
Education Agency, the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board, the Texas Workforce Commission or the State of
Texas.
Types of Charter Schools
• With more schools and students than a single charter
school, CMOs have some operational advantages in their
ability to spread administrative fixed costs, thus
providing the possibility of greater efficiency. In
addition, CMOs may be able to support additional
programs and more robust staffing.
• Whether CMOs lead to better student outcomes is a
matter of interest across the country.
OUR ANALYSES OF Houston CHARTER
SCHOOLS INCLUDE A BREAKOUT OF
CMOS AND INDEPENDENT CHARTERS.
There are two types
of charter schools.
CHA RTER MA NA GEMENT ORGA NIZA TIONS (CMOS)
O rga ni zati ons hol ding the c ha rte r and o verseei ng t he
o p e ra tio n o f a t l e ast t hree charter scho ols .
INDEP ENDENT CHA RTER SCHOOLS
O rga ni zati on ho ldi ng the cha rte r and o verseei ng t he
o pe rati on o f a single charte r schoo l . It may run t he scho ol
d irectl y o r co nt ract wit h a n orga nizati on which p rov ides
s e rvices t o o ne o r t wo c ha rt er schoo ls.
Methods
The annual academic growth of students in Houston from
2014-15 to 2017-18, overall and by sector, is benchmarked to
the state average growth, accounting for student
characteristics.
We also explore how one-year growth of Houston students
for the period ending in Spring 2018 differs by school type,
race, poverty status, English language learner status, special
education status, and gender.
Days of Learning
While these tools create precise and reliable answers,
they are presented in technical terms that are not
user-friendly to a general audience. To translate the
technical results into terms that are accessible to non-
technical audiences, CREDO developed Days of
Learning.
CREDO USES ADVANCED
TECHNOLOGY AND
SOPHISTICATED STATISTICAL
TOOLS TO MEASURE STUDENTS,
SCHOOLS AND THE EDUCATION
LANDSCAPE.
Think about the students in your state’s public schools. For many of their years
of schooling, they take achievement tests to measure what they know at the end of
the school year. We can identify the average score for each test each year.
Imagine a student who scores exactly at the average in one year, say 4th
grade, and then in the following year, scores exactly at the average again on the 5th-
grade test. The amount of year-to-year learning for that student show us what the
average learning is for all the students who took both tests.
We do that calculation for every grade the state tests: 4th to 5th, 5th to 6th,
and so on.
CREDO uses those annual measures of average learning to represent a typical
year of learning, and equates that to a typical 180-day school year. We say that the
student in our example has gained 180 days of learning.
If a stude nt makes more progress than the average stude nt, we take the
amount of extra achievement and translate it into 180-days of learning plus “X” extra
days. We are creating a measure of student learning as if the student went to school
for 180 days plus X days. The size of “X” depends on how much more the student
learns than the average student — if it’s a lot more, then “X” will be a large number,
and if it’s a small amount more, “X” will be a small number.
The same is true for students who do not learn as much as the average
student. Instead of adding to the 180-days-of-learning average, we subtract from
that base to reflect the smaller-than-average advances that those students realize. In
these cases, the difference leads to numbers such a “165 days of learning” or “152
days of learning”. Against the average standard of 180 days, these smaller days show
that students learned as if they had only attended school for 180 days minus X days
during the school year.
01
02
03
04
05
06
3rd
Grade
4th
Grade
= 180
days
More than 180
days
Less than 180
days
Student
A
Student
A
Overall Houston Results
S i g ni fi c ant a t p < 0 .0 5 *
S i g ni fi c ant a t p < 0 .0 1 **
R E A D ING M A T H
St a n d a rd
D e v i a t i on
D a y s o f
L e a rn i n g
St a n d a rd
D e v i a t i on
D a y s o f
L e a rn i n g
H o u s t o n O v e r a l l 2 0 1 5 - 1 6 0.00 -1 -0.02* -13*
H o u s t o n O v e r a l l 2 0 1 6 - 1 7 0.04** 25** 0.10** 56**
H o u s t o n O v e r a l l 2 0 1 7 - 1 8 0.00 -2 0.05** 28**
Houston School Sectors Compared
to State Average
S i g ni fi c ant a t p < 0 .0 5 *
S i g ni fi c ant a t p < 0 .0 1 **
R E A D ING M A T H
St a n d a rd
D e v i a t i on
D a y s o f
L e a rn i n g
St a n d a rd
D e v i a t i on
D a y s o f
L e a rn i n g
C h a r t e r S c h o o l s 2 0 1 5 - 1 6 0.07** 41** 0.05* 26*
C h a r t e r S c h o o l s 2 0 1 6 - 1 7 0.09** 55** 0.14** 80**
C h a r t e r S c h o o l s 2 0 1 7 - 1 8 0.07** 43** 0.15** 88**
M a g n e t S c h o o l s 2 0 1 5 - 1 6 0.14** 79** 0.03 18
M a g n e t S c h o o l s 2 0 1 6 - 1 7 0.22** 131** 0.12 72
M a g n e t S c h o o l s 2 0 1 7 - 1 8 0.12** 70** 0.03 14
O t h e r D i s t r i c t S c h o o l s 2 0 1 5 - 1 6 -0.01* -9* -0.03** -19**
O t h e r D i s t r i c t S c h o o l s 2 0 1 6 - 1 7 0.03** 18** 0.09** 53**
O t h e r D i s t r i c t S c h o o l s 2 0 1 7 - 1 8 -0.02* -11* 0.04** 20**
Comparison of School Sectors within Houston
S i g ni fi c ant a t p < 0 .0 5 *
S i g ni fi c ant a t p < 0 .0 1 **
R E A D ING M A T H
St a n d a rd
D e v i a t i on
D a y s o f
L e a rn i n g
St a n d a rd
D e v i a t i on
D a y s o f
L e a rn i n g
C h a r t e r S c h o o l s v s . O t h e r D i s t r i c t S c h o o l s 2 0 1 5 - 1 6 0.08** 49** 0.08** 44**
C h a r t e r S c h o o l s v s . O t h e r D i s t r i c t S c h o o l s 2 0 1 6 - 1 7 0.06** 36** 0.05* 27*
C h a r t e r S c h o o l s v s . O t h e r D i s t r i c t S c h o o l s 2 0 1 7 - 1 8 0.09** 53** 0.12** 67**
M a g n e t S c h o o l s v s . O t h e r D i s t r i c t S c h o o l s 2 0 1 5 - 1 6 0.15** 87** 0.06 37
M a g n e t S c h o o l s v s . O t h e r D i s t r i c t S c h o o l s 2 0 1 6 - 1 7 0.19** 112** 0.03 19
M a g n e t S c h o o l s v s . O t h e r D i s t r i c t S c h o o l s 2 0 1 7 - 1 8 0.14** 80** -0.01 -6
Charter Subsector Analysis
S i g ni fi c ant a t p < 0 .0 5 *
S i g ni fi c ant a t p < 0 .0 1 **
R E A D ING M A T H
St a n d a rd
D e v i a t i on
D a y s o f
L e a rn i n g
St a n d a rd
D e v i a t i on
D a y s o f
L e a rn i n g
H o u s t o n C M O s v s . S t a t e A v e r a g e 0.07** 41** 0.13** 77**
H o u s t o n I n d e p e n d e n t C h a r t e r s v s . S t a t e A v e r a g e 0.08** 48** 0.22** 128**
H o u s t o n C M O s v s . H o u s t o n I n d e p e n d e n t C h a r t e r s -0.01 -7 -0.09 -51
Student Subgroup Analysis> Black Students
S i g ni fi c ant a t p < 0 .0 5 *
S i g ni fi c ant a t p < 0 .0 1 **
R E A D ING M A T H
St a n d a rd
D e v i a t i on
D a y s o f
L e a rn i n g
St a n d a rd
D e v i a t i on
D a y s o f
L e a rn i n g
Compared with Statewide Average of Black Students
H o u s t o n B l a c k S t u d e n t s O v e r a l l -0.01 -6 0.03* 17*
H o u s t o n C h a r t e r S c h o o l B l a c k S t u d e n t s 0.06** 36** 0.10** 59**
H o u s t o n M a g n e t S c h o o l B l a c k S t u d e n t s 0.15** 90** 0.07 42
H o u s t o n O t h e r D i s t r i c t S c h o o l B l a c k S t u d e n t s -0.02** -14** 0.02 11
Compared with Black Students in Other District Schools
in Houston
H o u s t o n C h a r t e r S c h o o l B l a c k S t u d e n t s 0.09** 50** 0.08** 47**
H o u s t o n M a g n e t S c h o o l B l a c k S t u d e n t s 0.18** 104** 0.05 31
Student Subgroup Analysis> Hispanic Students
S i g ni fi c ant a t p < 0 .0 5 *
S i g ni fi c ant a t p < 0 .0 1 **
R E A D ING M A T H
St a n d a rd
D e v i a t i on
D a y s o f
L e a rn i n g
St a n d a rd
D e v i a t i on
D a y s o f
L e a rn i n g
Compared with Statewide Average of Hispanic Students
H o u s t o n H i s p a n i c S t u d e n t s O v e r a l l -0.01 -6 0.05** 27**
H o u s t o n C h a r t e r S c h o o l H i s p a n i c S t u d e n t s 0.08** 49** 0.17** 99**
H o u s t o n M a g n e t S c h o o l H i s p a n i c S t u d e n t s 0.09* 53* -0.01 -5
H o u s t o n O t h e r D i s t r i c t S c h o o l H i s p a n i c S t u d e n t s -0.03** -17** 0.03* 15*
Compared with Hispanic Students in Other District Schools
in Houston
H o u s t o n C h a r t e r S c h o o l H i s p a n i c S t u d e n t s 0.11** 66** 0.14** 83**
H o u s t o n M a g n e t S c h o o l H i s p a n i c S t u d e n t s 0.12** 70** -0.03 -21
Student Subgroup Analysis> Students in Poverty
S i g ni fi c ant a t p < 0 .0 5 *
S i g ni fi c ant a t p < 0 .0 1 **
R E A D ING M A T H
St a n d a rd
D e v i a t i on
D a y s o f
L e a rn i n g
St a n d a rd
D e v i a t i on
D a y s o f
L e a rn i n g
Compared with Statewide Average of Students in Poverty
H o u s t o n S t u d e n t s i n P o v e r t y O v e r a l l 0.00 -1 0.05** 30**
H o u s t o n C h a r t e r S c h o o l S t u d e n t s i n P o v e r t y 0.09** 52** 0.16** 95**
H o u s t o n M a g n e t S c h o o l S t u d e n t s i n P o v e r t y 0.11** 64** 0.02 14
H o u s t o n O t h e r D i s t r i c t S c h o o l S t u d e n t s i n P o v e r t y -0.02* -11* 0.04** 20**
Compared with Students in Poverty in Other District
Schools in Houston
H o u s t o n C h a r t e r S c h o o l S t u d e n t s i n P o v e r t y 0.11** 62** 0.13** 74**
H o u s t o n M a g n e t S c h o o l S t u d e n t s i n P o v e r t y 0.13** 74** -0.01 -7
Student Subgroup Analysis> ELL Students
S i g ni fi c ant a t p < 0 .0 5 *
S i g ni fi c ant a t p < 0 .0 1 **
R E A D ING M A T H
St a n d a rd
D e v i a t i on
D a y s o f
L e a rn i n g
St a n d a rd
D e v i a t i on
D a y s o f
L e a rn i n g
Compared with Statewide Average of ELL Students
H o u s t o n E L L S t u d e n t s O v e r a l l -0.06** -38** 0.01 7
H o u s t o n C h a r t e r S c h o o l E L L S t u d e n t s 0.03 20 0.11** 64**
H o u s t o n M a g n e t S c h o o l E L L S t u d e n t s -0.10 -61 -0.12* -70*
H o u s t o n O t h e r D i s t r i c t S c h o o l E L L S t u d e n t s -0.08** -47** 0.00 -2
Compared with ELL Students in Other District Schools
in Houston
H o u s t o n C h a r t e r S c h o o l E L L S t u d e n t s 0.11** 66** 0.11** 66**
H o u s t o n M a g n e t S c h o o l E L L S t u d e n t s -0.02 -15 -0.12* -68*
Student Subgroup Analysis> Special Ed Students
S i g ni fi c ant a t p < 0 .0 5 *
S i g ni fi c ant a t p < 0 .0 1 **
R E A D ING M A T H
St a n d a rd
D e v i a t i on
D a y s o f
L e a rn i n g
St a n d a rd
D e v i a t i on
D a y s o f
L e a rn i n g
Compared with Statewide Average of Special Ed Students
H o u s t o n S p e c i a l E d S t u d e n t s O v e r a l l 0.00 0 0.04* 21*
H o u s t o n C h a r t e r S c h o o l S p e c i a l E d S t u d e n t s 0.11** 63** 0.12** 72**
H o u s t o n M a g n e t S c h o o l S p e c i a l E d S t u d e n t s 0.08 47 -0.14 -80
H o u s t o n O t h e r D i s t r i c t S c h o o l S p e c i a l E d S t u d e n t s -0.01 -7 0.03* 18*
Compared with Special Ed Students in Other District
Schools in Houston
H o u s t o n C h a r t e r S c h o o l S p e c i a l E d S t u d e n t s 0.12** 70** 0.09** 54**
H o u s t o n M a g n e t S c h o o l S p e c i a l E d S t u d e n t s 0.09 53 -0.17 -98
Student Subgroup Analysis> Male Students
S i g ni fi c ant a t p < 0 .0 5 *
S i g ni fi c ant a t p < 0 .0 1 **
R E A D ING M A T H
St a n d a rd
D e v i a t i on
D a y s o f
L e a rn i n g
St a n d a rd
D e v i a t i on
D a y s o f
L e a rn i n g
Compared with Statewide Average of Male Students
H o u s t o n M a l e S t u d e n t s O v e r a l l 0.00 0 0.05** 27**
H o u s t o n C h a r t e r S c h o o l M a l e S t u d e n t s 0.08** 46** 0.15** 86**
H o u s t o n M a g n e t S c h o o l M a l e S t u d e n t s 0.09* 51* 0.02 11
H o u s t o n O t h e r D i s t r i c t S c h o o l M a l e S t u d e n t s -0.01 -8 0.03** 20**
Compared with Male Students in Other District Schools
in Houston
H o u s t o n C h a r t e r S c h o o l M a l e S t u d e n t s 0.09** 54** 0.11** 66**
H o u s t o n M a g n e t S c h o o l M a l e S t u d e n t s 0.10* 59* -0.02 -9
Student Subgroup Analysis> Female Students
S i g ni fi c ant a t p < 0 .0 5 *
S i g ni fi c ant a t p < 0 .0 1 **
R E A D ING M A T H
St a n d a rd
D e v i a t i on
D a y s o f
L e a rn i n g
St a n d a rd
D e v i a t i on
D a y s o f
L e a rn i n g
Compared with Statewide Average of Female Students
H o u s t o n F e m a l e S t u d e n t s O v e r a l l -0.01 -4 0.05** 29**
H o u s t o n C h a r t e r S c h o o l F e m a l e S t u d e n t s 0.07** 40** 0.15** 90**
H o u s t o n M a g n e t S c h o o l F e m a l e S t u d e n t s 0.15** 87** 0.03 17
H o u s t o n O t h e r D i s t r i c t S c h o o l F e m a l e S t u d e n t s -0.02** -13** 0.04** 21**
Compared with Female Students in Other District Schools
in Houston
H o u s t o n C h a r t e r S c h o o l F e m a l e S t u d e n t s 0.09** 52** 0.12** 69**
H o u s t o n M a g n e t S c h o o l F e m a l e S t u d e n t s 0.17** 99** -0.01 -5
THANK YOU

More Related Content

What's hot

Pla Methdology 3 19 2010
Pla Methdology 3 19 2010Pla Methdology 3 19 2010
Pla Methdology 3 19 2010WSU Cougars
 
2015 ConnCAN NAEP Analysis
2015 ConnCAN NAEP Analysis2015 ConnCAN NAEP Analysis
2015 ConnCAN NAEP AnalysisConnCAN
 
Introduction to Young Lives 2016-17 School Surveys
Introduction to Young Lives 2016-17 School SurveysIntroduction to Young Lives 2016-17 School Surveys
Introduction to Young Lives 2016-17 School SurveysYoung Lives Oxford
 
ConnCAN_sbac_analysis_09-03-2015
ConnCAN_sbac_analysis_09-03-2015ConnCAN_sbac_analysis_09-03-2015
ConnCAN_sbac_analysis_09-03-2015ConnCAN
 
Private schools in India - more learning, more inequality?
Private schools in India - more learning, more inequality?Private schools in India - more learning, more inequality?
Private schools in India - more learning, more inequality?Young Lives Oxford
 
2 discussion issues on timss and pisa.
2 discussion issues on timss and pisa.2 discussion issues on timss and pisa.
2 discussion issues on timss and pisa.Sarjan Paul Vosko
 
College Readiness for All final
College Readiness for All finalCollege Readiness for All final
College Readiness for All finalSabrina Matthews
 
Vietnam education for the 21st century
Vietnam   education for the 21st centuryVietnam   education for the 21st century
Vietnam education for the 21st centuryYoung Lives Oxford
 

What's hot (20)

Indianapolis, IN 2019 - City Study
Indianapolis, IN 2019 - City StudyIndianapolis, IN 2019 - City Study
Indianapolis, IN 2019 - City Study
 
St. Louis, MO 2019 - City Study
St. Louis, MO 2019 - City StudySt. Louis, MO 2019 - City Study
St. Louis, MO 2019 - City Study
 
New Orleans, LA 2019 - City Study
New Orleans, LA 2019 - City StudyNew Orleans, LA 2019 - City Study
New Orleans, LA 2019 - City Study
 
Memphis, TN 2019 - City Study
Memphis, TN 2019 - City StudyMemphis, TN 2019 - City Study
Memphis, TN 2019 - City Study
 
Baton Rouge LA 2019 - City Study
Baton Rouge LA 2019 - City StudyBaton Rouge LA 2019 - City Study
Baton Rouge LA 2019 - City Study
 
Washington DC 2019 - City Study
Washington DC 2019 - City StudyWashington DC 2019 - City Study
Washington DC 2019 - City Study
 
Pla Methdology 3 19 2010
Pla Methdology 3 19 2010Pla Methdology 3 19 2010
Pla Methdology 3 19 2010
 
School_Quality_Guide_2014_EMS_X125
School_Quality_Guide_2014_EMS_X125School_Quality_Guide_2014_EMS_X125
School_Quality_Guide_2014_EMS_X125
 
School Grades Webinar
School Grades Webinar School Grades Webinar
School Grades Webinar
 
NAEP release
NAEP releaseNAEP release
NAEP release
 
2016 Building a Grad Nation webinar slides
2016 Building a Grad Nation webinar slides2016 Building a Grad Nation webinar slides
2016 Building a Grad Nation webinar slides
 
Rfw ppt 4.12.18 comp
Rfw ppt 4.12.18 compRfw ppt 4.12.18 comp
Rfw ppt 4.12.18 comp
 
2015 ConnCAN NAEP Analysis
2015 ConnCAN NAEP Analysis2015 ConnCAN NAEP Analysis
2015 ConnCAN NAEP Analysis
 
Introduction to Young Lives 2016-17 School Surveys
Introduction to Young Lives 2016-17 School SurveysIntroduction to Young Lives 2016-17 School Surveys
Introduction to Young Lives 2016-17 School Surveys
 
ConnCAN_sbac_analysis_09-03-2015
ConnCAN_sbac_analysis_09-03-2015ConnCAN_sbac_analysis_09-03-2015
ConnCAN_sbac_analysis_09-03-2015
 
Private schools in India - more learning, more inequality?
Private schools in India - more learning, more inequality?Private schools in India - more learning, more inequality?
Private schools in India - more learning, more inequality?
 
SociologyExchange.co.uk Shared Resource
SociologyExchange.co.uk Shared ResourceSociologyExchange.co.uk Shared Resource
SociologyExchange.co.uk Shared Resource
 
2 discussion issues on timss and pisa.
2 discussion issues on timss and pisa.2 discussion issues on timss and pisa.
2 discussion issues on timss and pisa.
 
College Readiness for All final
College Readiness for All finalCollege Readiness for All final
College Readiness for All final
 
Vietnam education for the 21st century
Vietnam   education for the 21st centuryVietnam   education for the 21st century
Vietnam education for the 21st century
 

Similar to Houston slide deck

Las Vegas Chamber of Commerce Education Briefing Series
Las Vegas Chamber of Commerce Education Briefing SeriesLas Vegas Chamber of Commerce Education Briefing Series
Las Vegas Chamber of Commerce Education Briefing SeriesLas Vegas Chamber of Commerce
 
Franklin Public Schools: MCAS Presentation 2017
Franklin Public Schools: MCAS Presentation 2017Franklin Public Schools: MCAS Presentation 2017
Franklin Public Schools: MCAS Presentation 2017Franklin Matters
 
Pipeline math
Pipeline mathPipeline math
Pipeline mathharrindl
 
Pipelinebasicskillsmath2
Pipelinebasicskillsmath2Pipelinebasicskillsmath2
Pipelinebasicskillsmath2harrindl
 

Similar to Houston slide deck (20)

2022 Houston Chart School City Study
2022 Houston Chart School City Study2022 Houston Chart School City Study
2022 Houston Chart School City Study
 
2022 Austin Chart School City Study
2022 Austin Chart School City Study2022 Austin Chart School City Study
2022 Austin Chart School City Study
 
New Orleans
New OrleansNew Orleans
New Orleans
 
San Antonio, TX - 2022 Charter School Study by CREDO
San Antonio, TX - 2022 Charter School Study by CREDOSan Antonio, TX - 2022 Charter School Study by CREDO
San Antonio, TX - 2022 Charter School Study by CREDO
 
St_Louis_slide_deck_FINAL.pdf
St_Louis_slide_deck_FINAL.pdfSt_Louis_slide_deck_FINAL.pdf
St_Louis_slide_deck_FINAL.pdf
 
2022 Fort Worth Charter School City Study
2022 Fort Worth Charter School City Study2022 Fort Worth Charter School City Study
2022 Fort Worth Charter School City Study
 
batonrouge_slide_deck_FINAL_20220429.pdf
batonrouge_slide_deck_FINAL_20220429.pdfbatonrouge_slide_deck_FINAL_20220429.pdf
batonrouge_slide_deck_FINAL_20220429.pdf
 
Camden, NJ
Camden, NJCamden, NJ
Camden, NJ
 
Kansas_City_slide_deck_FINAL.pdf
Kansas_City_slide_deck_FINAL.pdfKansas_City_slide_deck_FINAL.pdf
Kansas_City_slide_deck_FINAL.pdf
 
Indianapolis_slide_deck_FINAL_20220601.pdf
Indianapolis_slide_deck_FINAL_20220601.pdfIndianapolis_slide_deck_FINAL_20220601.pdf
Indianapolis_slide_deck_FINAL_20220601.pdf
 
Washington DC. City Study 2022
Washington DC. City Study 2022Washington DC. City Study 2022
Washington DC. City Study 2022
 
memphis_slide_deck_FINAL_20220429.pdf
memphis_slide_deck_FINAL_20220429.pdfmemphis_slide_deck_FINAL_20220429.pdf
memphis_slide_deck_FINAL_20220429.pdf
 
DC_slide_deck_FINAL (1).pdf
DC_slide_deck_FINAL (1).pdfDC_slide_deck_FINAL (1).pdf
DC_slide_deck_FINAL (1).pdf
 
Denver, CO 2022 - City Study
Denver, CO 2022 - City StudyDenver, CO 2022 - City Study
Denver, CO 2022 - City Study
 
2022 Newark Chart School City Study
2022 Newark Chart School City Study2022 Newark Chart School City Study
2022 Newark Chart School City Study
 
Las Vegas Chamber of Commerce Education Briefing Series
Las Vegas Chamber of Commerce Education Briefing SeriesLas Vegas Chamber of Commerce Education Briefing Series
Las Vegas Chamber of Commerce Education Briefing Series
 
Franklin Public Schools: MCAS Presentation 2017
Franklin Public Schools: MCAS Presentation 2017Franklin Public Schools: MCAS Presentation 2017
Franklin Public Schools: MCAS Presentation 2017
 
MCAS 2019 Presentation
MCAS 2019 PresentationMCAS 2019 Presentation
MCAS 2019 Presentation
 
Pipeline math
Pipeline mathPipeline math
Pipeline math
 
Pipelinebasicskillsmath2
Pipelinebasicskillsmath2Pipelinebasicskillsmath2
Pipelinebasicskillsmath2
 

Recently uploaded

Meghan Sutherland In Media Res Media Component
Meghan Sutherland In Media Res Media ComponentMeghan Sutherland In Media Res Media Component
Meghan Sutherland In Media Res Media ComponentInMediaRes1
 
KSHARA STURA .pptx---KSHARA KARMA THERAPY (CAUSTIC THERAPY)————IMP.OF KSHARA ...
KSHARA STURA .pptx---KSHARA KARMA THERAPY (CAUSTIC THERAPY)————IMP.OF KSHARA ...KSHARA STURA .pptx---KSHARA KARMA THERAPY (CAUSTIC THERAPY)————IMP.OF KSHARA ...
KSHARA STURA .pptx---KSHARA KARMA THERAPY (CAUSTIC THERAPY)————IMP.OF KSHARA ...M56BOOKSTORE PRODUCT/SERVICE
 
Organic Name Reactions for the students and aspirants of Chemistry12th.pptx
Organic Name Reactions  for the students and aspirants of Chemistry12th.pptxOrganic Name Reactions  for the students and aspirants of Chemistry12th.pptx
Organic Name Reactions for the students and aspirants of Chemistry12th.pptxVS Mahajan Coaching Centre
 
POINT- BIOCHEMISTRY SEM 2 ENZYMES UNIT 5.pptx
POINT- BIOCHEMISTRY SEM 2 ENZYMES UNIT 5.pptxPOINT- BIOCHEMISTRY SEM 2 ENZYMES UNIT 5.pptx
POINT- BIOCHEMISTRY SEM 2 ENZYMES UNIT 5.pptxSayali Powar
 
ECONOMIC CONTEXT - PAPER 1 Q3: NEWSPAPERS.pptx
ECONOMIC CONTEXT - PAPER 1 Q3: NEWSPAPERS.pptxECONOMIC CONTEXT - PAPER 1 Q3: NEWSPAPERS.pptx
ECONOMIC CONTEXT - PAPER 1 Q3: NEWSPAPERS.pptxiammrhaywood
 
DATA STRUCTURE AND ALGORITHM for beginners
DATA STRUCTURE AND ALGORITHM for beginnersDATA STRUCTURE AND ALGORITHM for beginners
DATA STRUCTURE AND ALGORITHM for beginnersSabitha Banu
 
Enzyme, Pharmaceutical Aids, Miscellaneous Last Part of Chapter no 5th.pdf
Enzyme, Pharmaceutical Aids, Miscellaneous Last Part of Chapter no 5th.pdfEnzyme, Pharmaceutical Aids, Miscellaneous Last Part of Chapter no 5th.pdf
Enzyme, Pharmaceutical Aids, Miscellaneous Last Part of Chapter no 5th.pdfSumit Tiwari
 
Interactive Powerpoint_How to Master effective communication
Interactive Powerpoint_How to Master effective communicationInteractive Powerpoint_How to Master effective communication
Interactive Powerpoint_How to Master effective communicationnomboosow
 
MARGINALIZATION (Different learners in Marginalized Group
MARGINALIZATION (Different learners in Marginalized GroupMARGINALIZATION (Different learners in Marginalized Group
MARGINALIZATION (Different learners in Marginalized GroupJonathanParaisoCruz
 
Full Stack Web Development Course for Beginners
Full Stack Web Development Course  for BeginnersFull Stack Web Development Course  for Beginners
Full Stack Web Development Course for BeginnersSabitha Banu
 
Types of Journalistic Writing Grade 8.pptx
Types of Journalistic Writing Grade 8.pptxTypes of Journalistic Writing Grade 8.pptx
Types of Journalistic Writing Grade 8.pptxEyham Joco
 
Software Engineering Methodologies (overview)
Software Engineering Methodologies (overview)Software Engineering Methodologies (overview)
Software Engineering Methodologies (overview)eniolaolutunde
 
Painted Grey Ware.pptx, PGW Culture of India
Painted Grey Ware.pptx, PGW Culture of IndiaPainted Grey Ware.pptx, PGW Culture of India
Painted Grey Ware.pptx, PGW Culture of IndiaVirag Sontakke
 
Biting mechanism of poisonous snakes.pdf
Biting mechanism of poisonous snakes.pdfBiting mechanism of poisonous snakes.pdf
Biting mechanism of poisonous snakes.pdfadityarao40181
 
Capitol Tech U Doctoral Presentation - April 2024.pptx
Capitol Tech U Doctoral Presentation - April 2024.pptxCapitol Tech U Doctoral Presentation - April 2024.pptx
Capitol Tech U Doctoral Presentation - April 2024.pptxCapitolTechU
 
How to Make a Pirate ship Primary Education.pptx
How to Make a Pirate ship Primary Education.pptxHow to Make a Pirate ship Primary Education.pptx
How to Make a Pirate ship Primary Education.pptxmanuelaromero2013
 
18-04-UA_REPORT_MEDIALITERAСY_INDEX-DM_23-1-final-eng.pdf
18-04-UA_REPORT_MEDIALITERAСY_INDEX-DM_23-1-final-eng.pdf18-04-UA_REPORT_MEDIALITERAСY_INDEX-DM_23-1-final-eng.pdf
18-04-UA_REPORT_MEDIALITERAСY_INDEX-DM_23-1-final-eng.pdfssuser54595a
 
भारत-रोम व्यापार.pptx, Indo-Roman Trade,
भारत-रोम व्यापार.pptx, Indo-Roman Trade,भारत-रोम व्यापार.pptx, Indo-Roman Trade,
भारत-रोम व्यापार.pptx, Indo-Roman Trade,Virag Sontakke
 
Introduction to ArtificiaI Intelligence in Higher Education
Introduction to ArtificiaI Intelligence in Higher EducationIntroduction to ArtificiaI Intelligence in Higher Education
Introduction to ArtificiaI Intelligence in Higher Educationpboyjonauth
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Meghan Sutherland In Media Res Media Component
Meghan Sutherland In Media Res Media ComponentMeghan Sutherland In Media Res Media Component
Meghan Sutherland In Media Res Media Component
 
KSHARA STURA .pptx---KSHARA KARMA THERAPY (CAUSTIC THERAPY)————IMP.OF KSHARA ...
KSHARA STURA .pptx---KSHARA KARMA THERAPY (CAUSTIC THERAPY)————IMP.OF KSHARA ...KSHARA STURA .pptx---KSHARA KARMA THERAPY (CAUSTIC THERAPY)————IMP.OF KSHARA ...
KSHARA STURA .pptx---KSHARA KARMA THERAPY (CAUSTIC THERAPY)————IMP.OF KSHARA ...
 
Organic Name Reactions for the students and aspirants of Chemistry12th.pptx
Organic Name Reactions  for the students and aspirants of Chemistry12th.pptxOrganic Name Reactions  for the students and aspirants of Chemistry12th.pptx
Organic Name Reactions for the students and aspirants of Chemistry12th.pptx
 
POINT- BIOCHEMISTRY SEM 2 ENZYMES UNIT 5.pptx
POINT- BIOCHEMISTRY SEM 2 ENZYMES UNIT 5.pptxPOINT- BIOCHEMISTRY SEM 2 ENZYMES UNIT 5.pptx
POINT- BIOCHEMISTRY SEM 2 ENZYMES UNIT 5.pptx
 
ECONOMIC CONTEXT - PAPER 1 Q3: NEWSPAPERS.pptx
ECONOMIC CONTEXT - PAPER 1 Q3: NEWSPAPERS.pptxECONOMIC CONTEXT - PAPER 1 Q3: NEWSPAPERS.pptx
ECONOMIC CONTEXT - PAPER 1 Q3: NEWSPAPERS.pptx
 
DATA STRUCTURE AND ALGORITHM for beginners
DATA STRUCTURE AND ALGORITHM for beginnersDATA STRUCTURE AND ALGORITHM for beginners
DATA STRUCTURE AND ALGORITHM for beginners
 
Enzyme, Pharmaceutical Aids, Miscellaneous Last Part of Chapter no 5th.pdf
Enzyme, Pharmaceutical Aids, Miscellaneous Last Part of Chapter no 5th.pdfEnzyme, Pharmaceutical Aids, Miscellaneous Last Part of Chapter no 5th.pdf
Enzyme, Pharmaceutical Aids, Miscellaneous Last Part of Chapter no 5th.pdf
 
Interactive Powerpoint_How to Master effective communication
Interactive Powerpoint_How to Master effective communicationInteractive Powerpoint_How to Master effective communication
Interactive Powerpoint_How to Master effective communication
 
MARGINALIZATION (Different learners in Marginalized Group
MARGINALIZATION (Different learners in Marginalized GroupMARGINALIZATION (Different learners in Marginalized Group
MARGINALIZATION (Different learners in Marginalized Group
 
Full Stack Web Development Course for Beginners
Full Stack Web Development Course  for BeginnersFull Stack Web Development Course  for Beginners
Full Stack Web Development Course for Beginners
 
Types of Journalistic Writing Grade 8.pptx
Types of Journalistic Writing Grade 8.pptxTypes of Journalistic Writing Grade 8.pptx
Types of Journalistic Writing Grade 8.pptx
 
Software Engineering Methodologies (overview)
Software Engineering Methodologies (overview)Software Engineering Methodologies (overview)
Software Engineering Methodologies (overview)
 
Painted Grey Ware.pptx, PGW Culture of India
Painted Grey Ware.pptx, PGW Culture of IndiaPainted Grey Ware.pptx, PGW Culture of India
Painted Grey Ware.pptx, PGW Culture of India
 
Biting mechanism of poisonous snakes.pdf
Biting mechanism of poisonous snakes.pdfBiting mechanism of poisonous snakes.pdf
Biting mechanism of poisonous snakes.pdf
 
Capitol Tech U Doctoral Presentation - April 2024.pptx
Capitol Tech U Doctoral Presentation - April 2024.pptxCapitol Tech U Doctoral Presentation - April 2024.pptx
Capitol Tech U Doctoral Presentation - April 2024.pptx
 
ESSENTIAL of (CS/IT/IS) class 06 (database)
ESSENTIAL of (CS/IT/IS) class 06 (database)ESSENTIAL of (CS/IT/IS) class 06 (database)
ESSENTIAL of (CS/IT/IS) class 06 (database)
 
How to Make a Pirate ship Primary Education.pptx
How to Make a Pirate ship Primary Education.pptxHow to Make a Pirate ship Primary Education.pptx
How to Make a Pirate ship Primary Education.pptx
 
18-04-UA_REPORT_MEDIALITERAСY_INDEX-DM_23-1-final-eng.pdf
18-04-UA_REPORT_MEDIALITERAСY_INDEX-DM_23-1-final-eng.pdf18-04-UA_REPORT_MEDIALITERAСY_INDEX-DM_23-1-final-eng.pdf
18-04-UA_REPORT_MEDIALITERAСY_INDEX-DM_23-1-final-eng.pdf
 
भारत-रोम व्यापार.pptx, Indo-Roman Trade,
भारत-रोम व्यापार.pptx, Indo-Roman Trade,भारत-रोम व्यापार.pptx, Indo-Roman Trade,
भारत-रोम व्यापार.pptx, Indo-Roman Trade,
 
Introduction to ArtificiaI Intelligence in Higher Education
Introduction to ArtificiaI Intelligence in Higher EducationIntroduction to ArtificiaI Intelligence in Higher Education
Introduction to ArtificiaI Intelligence in Higher Education
 

Houston slide deck

  • 2. Table of Contents 01 R E PO RT O V E R V IE W • A bout T he C ity Studies P roject • Sectors of Schools • Research Question and A nalyses • M easure of A cademic Performance Student Subgroup Analysis Summary of Findings 03 A PPE N DIX E S • A cknowledgments • T ypes of C harter Schools • M ethods • Days of Learning • Full Set of Findings 02 R E S E A R C H F IN DIN G S • Reading & M ath Overall Houston Results Sector Analysis • vs. state & comparison within Houston Charter Subsector Analysis • Reading • M ath School-Level Performance by Sector Research Findings Cont’d. Black Students • all vs. state • vs. state by sector & comparison within Houston Hispanic Students • all vs. state • vs. state by sector & comparison within Houston Students in Poverty • all vs. state • vs. state by sector & comparison within Houston ELL Students • all vs. state • vs. state by sector & comparison within Houston Special Ed Students • all vs. state • vs. state by sector & comparison within Houston Male Students • all vs. state • vs. state by sector & comparison within Houston Female Students • all vs. state • vs. state by sector & comparison within Houston • Reading • M ath
  • 4. About The City Studies Project Cohort 1 Cohort 2 The City Studies project examines the performance of schools in select U.S. cities, including Houston. We study the academic progress of students as the measure of school performance.
  • 5. O O C C C CHARTER SCHOOLS Public schools operated independently from the traditional school district, with autonomy in adapting school designs and held accountable for education results. C harter M anagement Organizations (CMOs) O rganizations holding the charter and overseeing the operation of at least three charter schools. Independent C harter Schools O rganizations holding the charter and overseeing the operation of a single or two charter schools. SELECTIVE MAGNET SCHOOLS District-run schools with focused themes and academically selective admission. OTHER DISTRICT-RUN SCHOOLS Public schools not belonging to any of above two types. C Sectors of Schools COMMUNITIES MA Y HA VE UP TO THREE S ECTORS OF S CHOOLS
  • 6. Research Question and Analyses IN THIS REPORT WE EXAMINE ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE IN HOUSTON USING DATA FROM THE SCHOOL YEARS 2013-14 THROUGH 2017-18. THERE ARE THREE LEVELS OF ANALYSIS. Ov e rall performance in Houston schools over three years. • The performance of Houston students is benchmarked against the state average performance, accounting for student characteristics. • The performance of charter school students and the performance of magnet school students within Houston are then compared to that of similar traditional public school (district school) students within Houston. Pe rformance for charter schools, magnet schools and the rest of Houston Public schools over three years Performance in the 2017- 2018 school year by school type, race, pov erty status, English language learner (ELL) sta tus, special e ducation status a nd ge nder. WE MAKE TWO SETS OF COMPARISONS. 01 02 03
  • 7. Achievement scores capture what a student knows at a point in time. They are influenced by students’ prior conditions in addition to schools’ contributions. Growth scores indicate how much progress a student makes from one year to the next. Growth scores allow us to zero in on the contributions of schools separately from other factors that affect point-in-time scores. ACHIEVEMENT VS. GROWTH We analyze student growth in standard deviation units so that the results can be assessed for statistical differences. The full set of findings appear in the Appendix. In the following graphs of findings, we transform growth from standard deviation units into days of learning based on a typical 180-day school year. IN THIS STUDY WE MEASURE ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE AS HOW MUCH GROWTH STUDENTS MAKE FROM ONE YEAR TO THE NEXT Measure of Academic Performance
  • 9. -125 -100 -75 -50 -25 0 25 50 75 100 125 SY 2015-2016 SY 2016-2017 SY 2017-2018 Growth (in Days of Learning) significantly different at p< 0.05 reading math Research Findings > Overall Houston Results > Reading & Math Average One-Year Learning Gains for All Houston Students Compared to the State Average Learning Gains, by Year and Subject
  • 10. -75 -50 -25 0 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 SY 2015-2016 SY 2016-2017 SY 2017-2018 Growth (in Days of Learning) Learning Gains in Reading for Students in Houston Charter Schools, Houston Magnet Schools, and Houston District Schools Compared to the State Average Learning Gains, by Year significantly different at p< 0.05 charter magnet Research Findings > Sector Analysis > Reading VS. STATE & COMPARISON WITHIN HOUSTON charter magnet district Reading Charter vs. District Magnet vs. District Charter vs. Magnet '15-'16 '16-'17 '17-'18 Tests of Differences
  • 11. -75 -50 -25 0 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 SY 2015-2016 SY 2016-2017 SY 2017-2018 Growth (in Days of Learning) Learning Gains in Math for Students in Houston Charter Schools, Houston Magnet Schools, and Houston District Schools Compared to the State Average Learning Gains, by Year significantly different at p< 0.05 charter magnet district Research Findings > Sector Analysis > Math VS. STATE & COMPARISON WITHIN HOUSTON Math Charter vs. District Magnet vs. District Charter vs. Magnet Tests of Differences '15-'16 '16-'17 '17-'18
  • 12. -75 -50 -25 0 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 CMO Charter Schools Independent Charter Schools Growth (in Days of Learning) Relative Learning Gains for Students in Houston CMO- Affiliated Charter Schools and Independent Houston Charter Schools Compared to the Average Learning Gains for All Student in the State, by Subject significantly different at p< 0.05 reading math Research Findings > Charter Subsector Analysis > vs. state & comparison within Houston Reading CMOs vs Independent Charter Schools Math CMOs vs Independent Charter Schools sig Tests of Differences
  • 13. -400 -300 -200 -100 0 100 200 300 400 500 Growth (in Daysof Learning) Charter District Magnet Research Findings > School-Level Performance by Sector > Reading
  • 14. -400 -300 -200 -100 0 100 200 300 400 500 Growth (in Daysof Learning) Charter District Magnet Research Findings > School-Level Performance by Sector >Math
  • 15. -100 -75 -50 -25 0 25 50 75 100 125 150 Houston Black Students Growth (in Days of Learning) Learning Gains for All Houston Black Students Compared to the Average Learning Gains of Black Students Statewide, by Subject significantly different at p< 0.05 reading math Research Findings > Student Subgroup Analysis > Black Students ALL VS. STATE
  • 16. -100 -75 -50 -25 0 25 50 75 100 125 150 Houston Charter Black Students Houston Magnet Black Students Houston District Black Students Growth (in Days of Learning) Learning Gains for Black Students in Houston Charter Schools, Black Students in Houston Magnet Schools, and Black Students in Houston District Schools Compared to the Average Learning Gains of Black Students Statewide, by Subject significantly different at p< 0.05 reading math Research Findings > Student Subgroup Analysis > Black Students VS. STATE BY SECTOR & COMPARISON WITHIN HOUSTON Reading Charter Black vs. District Black Magnet Black vs. District Black Math Charter Black vs. District Black Magnet Black vs. District Black Tests of Differences sig
  • 17. -100 -75 -50 -25 0 25 50 75 100 125 150 Houston Hispanic Students Growth (in Days of Learning) Learning Gains for All Houston Hispanic Students Compared to the Average Learning Gains of Hispanic Students Statewide, by Subject significantly different at p< 0.05 reading math Research Findings > Student Subgroup Analysis > Hispanic Students ALL VS. STATE
  • 18. -100 -75 -50 -25 0 25 50 75 100 125 150 Houston Charter Hispanic Students Houston Magnet Hispanic Students Houston District Hispanic Students Growth (in Days of Learning) Learning Gains for Hispanic Students in Houston Charter Schools, Hispanic Students in Houston Magnet Schools, and Hispanic Students in Houston District Schools Compared to the Average Learning Gains of Hispanic Students Statewide, by Subject significantly different at p< 0.05 reading math Research Findings > Student Subgroup Analysis > Hispanic Students VS. STATE BY SECTOR & COMPARISON WITHIN HOUSTON Reading Charter Hispanic vs. District Hispanic Magnet Hispanic vs. District Hispanic Math Charter Hispanic vs. District Hispanic Magnet Hispanic vs. District Hispanic Tests of Differences sig
  • 19. -100 -75 -50 -25 0 25 50 75 100 125 150 Houston Students in Poverty Growth (in Days of Learning) Learning Gains for All Houston Students in Poverty Compared to the Average Learning Gains of Students in Poverty Statewide, by Subject significantly different at p< 0.05 reading math Research Findings > Student Subgroup Analysis > Students in Poverty ALL VS. STATE
  • 20. -100 -75 -50 -25 0 25 50 75 100 125 150 Houston Charter Students in Poverty Houston Magnet Students in Poverty Houston District Students in Poverty Growth (in Days of Learning) Learning Gains for Houston Charter School Students in Poverty, Houston Magnet School Students in Poverty, and Houston District School Students in Poverty Compared to the Average Learning Gains of Students in Poverty Statewide, by Subject significantly different at p< 0.05 reading math Research Findings > Student Subgroup Analysis > Students in Poverty VS. STATE BY SECTOR & COMPARISON WITHIN HOUSTON Reading Charter Poverty vs. District Poverty Magnet Poverty vs. District Poverty Math Charter Poverty vs. District Poverty Magnet Poverty vs. District Poverty Tests of Differences sig
  • 21. -125 -100 -75 -50 -25 0 25 50 75 100 125 Houston ELL Students Growth (in Days of Learning) Learning Gains for All ELL Students in Houston Compared to the Average Learning Gains of ELL Students Statewide, by Subject significantly different at p< 0.05 reading math Research Findings > Student Subgroup Analysis > ELL Students ALL VS. STATE
  • 22. -125 -100 -75 -50 -25 0 25 50 75 100 125 Houston Charter ELL Students Houston Magnet ELL Students Houston District ELL Students Growth (in Days of Learning) Learning Gains for ELL Students in Houston Charter Schools, ELL Students in Houston Magnet Schools, and ELL Students in Houston District Schools Compared to the Average Learning Gains of ELL Students Statewide, by Subject significantly different at p< 0.05 reading math Research Findings > Student Subgroup Analysis > ELL Students VS. STATE BY SECTOR & COMPARISON WITHIN HOUSTON Reading Charter ELL vs. District ELL Magnet ELL vs. District ELL Math Charter ELL vs. District ELL Magnet ELL vs. District ELL Tests of Differences sig
  • 23. -125 -100 -75 -50 -25 0 25 50 75 100 125 Houston Special Ed Students Growth (in Days of Learning) Learning Gains for All Houston Students in Special Education Compared to the Average Learning Gains of Students in Special Education Statewide, by Subject significantly different at p< 0.05 reading math Research Findings > Student Subgroup Analysis > Special Ed Students ALL VS. STATE
  • 24. -125 -100 -75 -50 -25 0 25 50 75 100 125 Houston Charter Students in Special Ed. Houston Magnet Students in Special Ed. Houston District Students in Special Ed. Growth (in Days of Learning) Learning Gains for Houston Charter School Students in Special Ed., Houston Magnet School Students in Special Ed., and Houston District School Students in Special Ed. Compared to the Average Learning Gains of Students in Special Ed. Statewide, by Subject significantly different at p< 0.05 reading math Research Findings > Student Subgroup Analysis > Special Ed Students VS. STATE BY SECTOR & COMPARISON WITHIN HOUSTON Reading Charter Sped vs. District Sped Magnet Sped vs. District Sped Math Charter Sped vs. District Sped Magnet Sped vs. District Sped Tests of Differences sig
  • 25. -100 -75 -50 -25 0 25 50 75 100 125 150 Houston Male Students Growth (in Days of Learning) Learning Gains for All Houston Male Students Compared to the Average Learning Gains of Male Students Statewide, by Subject significantly different at p< 0.05 reading math Research Findings > Student Subgroup Analysis > Male Students ALL VS. STATE
  • 26. -100 -75 -50 -25 0 25 50 75 100 125 150 Houston Charter Male Students Houston Magnet Male Students Houston District Male Students Growth (in Days of Learning) Learning Gains for Male Students in Houston Charter Schools, Male Students in Houston Magnet Schools, and Male Students in Houston District Schools Compared to the Average Learning Gains of Male Students Statewide, by Subject significantly different at p< 0.05 reading math Research Findings > Student Subgroup Analysis > Male Students VS. STATE BY SECTOR & COMPARISON WITHIN HOUSTON Reading Charter Male vs. District Male Magnet Male vs. District Male Math Charter Male vs. District Male Magnet Male vs. District Male Tests of Differences sig Reading Charter Male vs. District Male Magnet Male vs. District Male Math Charter Male vs. District Male Magnet Male vs. District Male Tests of Differences sig
  • 27. -100 -75 -50 -25 0 25 50 75 100 125 150 Houston Female Students Growth (in Days of Learning) Learning Gains for All Houston Female Students Compared to the Average Learning Gains of Female Students Statewide, by Subject significantly different at p< 0.05 reading math Research Findings > Student Subgroup Analysis > Female Students ALL VS. STATE
  • 28. -100 -75 -50 -25 0 25 50 75 100 125 150 Houston Charter Female Students Houston Magnet Female Students Houston District Female Students Growth (in Days of Learning) Learning Gains for Female Students in Houston Charter Schools, Female Students in Houston Magnet Schools, and Female Students in Houston District Schools Compared to the Average Learning Gains of Female Students Statewide, by Subject significantly different at p< 0.05 reading math Research Findings > Student Subgroup Analysis > Female Students VS. STATE BY SECTOR & COMPARISON WITHIN HOUSTON Reading Charter Female vs. District Female Magnet Female vs. District Female Math Charter Female vs. District Female Magnet Female vs. District Female Tests of Differences sig
  • 29. Summary of Findings The summary of the findings from the analysis of Houston schools is presented here.
  • 31. Acknowledgments Texas Education Agency, Texas Schools Project, and Texas Higher Education Advisory Board provided supports in the acquisition of student-level data. The Houston Independent School District assisted CREDO with identifying selective magnet schools in Houston. Good Reason Houston assisted CREDO with verifying the list of public schools in Houston. Disclaimer: The conclusions of this research do not necessarily reflect the opinions or official position of the Texas Education Agency, the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board, the Texas Workforce Commission or the State of Texas.
  • 32. Types of Charter Schools • With more schools and students than a single charter school, CMOs have some operational advantages in their ability to spread administrative fixed costs, thus providing the possibility of greater efficiency. In addition, CMOs may be able to support additional programs and more robust staffing. • Whether CMOs lead to better student outcomes is a matter of interest across the country. OUR ANALYSES OF Houston CHARTER SCHOOLS INCLUDE A BREAKOUT OF CMOS AND INDEPENDENT CHARTERS. There are two types of charter schools. CHA RTER MA NA GEMENT ORGA NIZA TIONS (CMOS) O rga ni zati ons hol ding the c ha rte r and o verseei ng t he o p e ra tio n o f a t l e ast t hree charter scho ols . INDEP ENDENT CHA RTER SCHOOLS O rga ni zati on ho ldi ng the cha rte r and o verseei ng t he o pe rati on o f a single charte r schoo l . It may run t he scho ol d irectl y o r co nt ract wit h a n orga nizati on which p rov ides s e rvices t o o ne o r t wo c ha rt er schoo ls.
  • 33. Methods The annual academic growth of students in Houston from 2014-15 to 2017-18, overall and by sector, is benchmarked to the state average growth, accounting for student characteristics. We also explore how one-year growth of Houston students for the period ending in Spring 2018 differs by school type, race, poverty status, English language learner status, special education status, and gender.
  • 34. Days of Learning While these tools create precise and reliable answers, they are presented in technical terms that are not user-friendly to a general audience. To translate the technical results into terms that are accessible to non- technical audiences, CREDO developed Days of Learning. CREDO USES ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY AND SOPHISTICATED STATISTICAL TOOLS TO MEASURE STUDENTS, SCHOOLS AND THE EDUCATION LANDSCAPE. Think about the students in your state’s public schools. For many of their years of schooling, they take achievement tests to measure what they know at the end of the school year. We can identify the average score for each test each year. Imagine a student who scores exactly at the average in one year, say 4th grade, and then in the following year, scores exactly at the average again on the 5th- grade test. The amount of year-to-year learning for that student show us what the average learning is for all the students who took both tests. We do that calculation for every grade the state tests: 4th to 5th, 5th to 6th, and so on. CREDO uses those annual measures of average learning to represent a typical year of learning, and equates that to a typical 180-day school year. We say that the student in our example has gained 180 days of learning. If a stude nt makes more progress than the average stude nt, we take the amount of extra achievement and translate it into 180-days of learning plus “X” extra days. We are creating a measure of student learning as if the student went to school for 180 days plus X days. The size of “X” depends on how much more the student learns than the average student — if it’s a lot more, then “X” will be a large number, and if it’s a small amount more, “X” will be a small number. The same is true for students who do not learn as much as the average student. Instead of adding to the 180-days-of-learning average, we subtract from that base to reflect the smaller-than-average advances that those students realize. In these cases, the difference leads to numbers such a “165 days of learning” or “152 days of learning”. Against the average standard of 180 days, these smaller days show that students learned as if they had only attended school for 180 days minus X days during the school year. 01 02 03 04 05 06 3rd Grade 4th Grade = 180 days More than 180 days Less than 180 days Student A Student A
  • 35. Overall Houston Results S i g ni fi c ant a t p < 0 .0 5 * S i g ni fi c ant a t p < 0 .0 1 ** R E A D ING M A T H St a n d a rd D e v i a t i on D a y s o f L e a rn i n g St a n d a rd D e v i a t i on D a y s o f L e a rn i n g H o u s t o n O v e r a l l 2 0 1 5 - 1 6 0.00 -1 -0.02* -13* H o u s t o n O v e r a l l 2 0 1 6 - 1 7 0.04** 25** 0.10** 56** H o u s t o n O v e r a l l 2 0 1 7 - 1 8 0.00 -2 0.05** 28**
  • 36. Houston School Sectors Compared to State Average S i g ni fi c ant a t p < 0 .0 5 * S i g ni fi c ant a t p < 0 .0 1 ** R E A D ING M A T H St a n d a rd D e v i a t i on D a y s o f L e a rn i n g St a n d a rd D e v i a t i on D a y s o f L e a rn i n g C h a r t e r S c h o o l s 2 0 1 5 - 1 6 0.07** 41** 0.05* 26* C h a r t e r S c h o o l s 2 0 1 6 - 1 7 0.09** 55** 0.14** 80** C h a r t e r S c h o o l s 2 0 1 7 - 1 8 0.07** 43** 0.15** 88** M a g n e t S c h o o l s 2 0 1 5 - 1 6 0.14** 79** 0.03 18 M a g n e t S c h o o l s 2 0 1 6 - 1 7 0.22** 131** 0.12 72 M a g n e t S c h o o l s 2 0 1 7 - 1 8 0.12** 70** 0.03 14 O t h e r D i s t r i c t S c h o o l s 2 0 1 5 - 1 6 -0.01* -9* -0.03** -19** O t h e r D i s t r i c t S c h o o l s 2 0 1 6 - 1 7 0.03** 18** 0.09** 53** O t h e r D i s t r i c t S c h o o l s 2 0 1 7 - 1 8 -0.02* -11* 0.04** 20**
  • 37. Comparison of School Sectors within Houston S i g ni fi c ant a t p < 0 .0 5 * S i g ni fi c ant a t p < 0 .0 1 ** R E A D ING M A T H St a n d a rd D e v i a t i on D a y s o f L e a rn i n g St a n d a rd D e v i a t i on D a y s o f L e a rn i n g C h a r t e r S c h o o l s v s . O t h e r D i s t r i c t S c h o o l s 2 0 1 5 - 1 6 0.08** 49** 0.08** 44** C h a r t e r S c h o o l s v s . O t h e r D i s t r i c t S c h o o l s 2 0 1 6 - 1 7 0.06** 36** 0.05* 27* C h a r t e r S c h o o l s v s . O t h e r D i s t r i c t S c h o o l s 2 0 1 7 - 1 8 0.09** 53** 0.12** 67** M a g n e t S c h o o l s v s . O t h e r D i s t r i c t S c h o o l s 2 0 1 5 - 1 6 0.15** 87** 0.06 37 M a g n e t S c h o o l s v s . O t h e r D i s t r i c t S c h o o l s 2 0 1 6 - 1 7 0.19** 112** 0.03 19 M a g n e t S c h o o l s v s . O t h e r D i s t r i c t S c h o o l s 2 0 1 7 - 1 8 0.14** 80** -0.01 -6
  • 38. Charter Subsector Analysis S i g ni fi c ant a t p < 0 .0 5 * S i g ni fi c ant a t p < 0 .0 1 ** R E A D ING M A T H St a n d a rd D e v i a t i on D a y s o f L e a rn i n g St a n d a rd D e v i a t i on D a y s o f L e a rn i n g H o u s t o n C M O s v s . S t a t e A v e r a g e 0.07** 41** 0.13** 77** H o u s t o n I n d e p e n d e n t C h a r t e r s v s . S t a t e A v e r a g e 0.08** 48** 0.22** 128** H o u s t o n C M O s v s . H o u s t o n I n d e p e n d e n t C h a r t e r s -0.01 -7 -0.09 -51
  • 39. Student Subgroup Analysis> Black Students S i g ni fi c ant a t p < 0 .0 5 * S i g ni fi c ant a t p < 0 .0 1 ** R E A D ING M A T H St a n d a rd D e v i a t i on D a y s o f L e a rn i n g St a n d a rd D e v i a t i on D a y s o f L e a rn i n g Compared with Statewide Average of Black Students H o u s t o n B l a c k S t u d e n t s O v e r a l l -0.01 -6 0.03* 17* H o u s t o n C h a r t e r S c h o o l B l a c k S t u d e n t s 0.06** 36** 0.10** 59** H o u s t o n M a g n e t S c h o o l B l a c k S t u d e n t s 0.15** 90** 0.07 42 H o u s t o n O t h e r D i s t r i c t S c h o o l B l a c k S t u d e n t s -0.02** -14** 0.02 11 Compared with Black Students in Other District Schools in Houston H o u s t o n C h a r t e r S c h o o l B l a c k S t u d e n t s 0.09** 50** 0.08** 47** H o u s t o n M a g n e t S c h o o l B l a c k S t u d e n t s 0.18** 104** 0.05 31
  • 40. Student Subgroup Analysis> Hispanic Students S i g ni fi c ant a t p < 0 .0 5 * S i g ni fi c ant a t p < 0 .0 1 ** R E A D ING M A T H St a n d a rd D e v i a t i on D a y s o f L e a rn i n g St a n d a rd D e v i a t i on D a y s o f L e a rn i n g Compared with Statewide Average of Hispanic Students H o u s t o n H i s p a n i c S t u d e n t s O v e r a l l -0.01 -6 0.05** 27** H o u s t o n C h a r t e r S c h o o l H i s p a n i c S t u d e n t s 0.08** 49** 0.17** 99** H o u s t o n M a g n e t S c h o o l H i s p a n i c S t u d e n t s 0.09* 53* -0.01 -5 H o u s t o n O t h e r D i s t r i c t S c h o o l H i s p a n i c S t u d e n t s -0.03** -17** 0.03* 15* Compared with Hispanic Students in Other District Schools in Houston H o u s t o n C h a r t e r S c h o o l H i s p a n i c S t u d e n t s 0.11** 66** 0.14** 83** H o u s t o n M a g n e t S c h o o l H i s p a n i c S t u d e n t s 0.12** 70** -0.03 -21
  • 41. Student Subgroup Analysis> Students in Poverty S i g ni fi c ant a t p < 0 .0 5 * S i g ni fi c ant a t p < 0 .0 1 ** R E A D ING M A T H St a n d a rd D e v i a t i on D a y s o f L e a rn i n g St a n d a rd D e v i a t i on D a y s o f L e a rn i n g Compared with Statewide Average of Students in Poverty H o u s t o n S t u d e n t s i n P o v e r t y O v e r a l l 0.00 -1 0.05** 30** H o u s t o n C h a r t e r S c h o o l S t u d e n t s i n P o v e r t y 0.09** 52** 0.16** 95** H o u s t o n M a g n e t S c h o o l S t u d e n t s i n P o v e r t y 0.11** 64** 0.02 14 H o u s t o n O t h e r D i s t r i c t S c h o o l S t u d e n t s i n P o v e r t y -0.02* -11* 0.04** 20** Compared with Students in Poverty in Other District Schools in Houston H o u s t o n C h a r t e r S c h o o l S t u d e n t s i n P o v e r t y 0.11** 62** 0.13** 74** H o u s t o n M a g n e t S c h o o l S t u d e n t s i n P o v e r t y 0.13** 74** -0.01 -7
  • 42. Student Subgroup Analysis> ELL Students S i g ni fi c ant a t p < 0 .0 5 * S i g ni fi c ant a t p < 0 .0 1 ** R E A D ING M A T H St a n d a rd D e v i a t i on D a y s o f L e a rn i n g St a n d a rd D e v i a t i on D a y s o f L e a rn i n g Compared with Statewide Average of ELL Students H o u s t o n E L L S t u d e n t s O v e r a l l -0.06** -38** 0.01 7 H o u s t o n C h a r t e r S c h o o l E L L S t u d e n t s 0.03 20 0.11** 64** H o u s t o n M a g n e t S c h o o l E L L S t u d e n t s -0.10 -61 -0.12* -70* H o u s t o n O t h e r D i s t r i c t S c h o o l E L L S t u d e n t s -0.08** -47** 0.00 -2 Compared with ELL Students in Other District Schools in Houston H o u s t o n C h a r t e r S c h o o l E L L S t u d e n t s 0.11** 66** 0.11** 66** H o u s t o n M a g n e t S c h o o l E L L S t u d e n t s -0.02 -15 -0.12* -68*
  • 43. Student Subgroup Analysis> Special Ed Students S i g ni fi c ant a t p < 0 .0 5 * S i g ni fi c ant a t p < 0 .0 1 ** R E A D ING M A T H St a n d a rd D e v i a t i on D a y s o f L e a rn i n g St a n d a rd D e v i a t i on D a y s o f L e a rn i n g Compared with Statewide Average of Special Ed Students H o u s t o n S p e c i a l E d S t u d e n t s O v e r a l l 0.00 0 0.04* 21* H o u s t o n C h a r t e r S c h o o l S p e c i a l E d S t u d e n t s 0.11** 63** 0.12** 72** H o u s t o n M a g n e t S c h o o l S p e c i a l E d S t u d e n t s 0.08 47 -0.14 -80 H o u s t o n O t h e r D i s t r i c t S c h o o l S p e c i a l E d S t u d e n t s -0.01 -7 0.03* 18* Compared with Special Ed Students in Other District Schools in Houston H o u s t o n C h a r t e r S c h o o l S p e c i a l E d S t u d e n t s 0.12** 70** 0.09** 54** H o u s t o n M a g n e t S c h o o l S p e c i a l E d S t u d e n t s 0.09 53 -0.17 -98
  • 44. Student Subgroup Analysis> Male Students S i g ni fi c ant a t p < 0 .0 5 * S i g ni fi c ant a t p < 0 .0 1 ** R E A D ING M A T H St a n d a rd D e v i a t i on D a y s o f L e a rn i n g St a n d a rd D e v i a t i on D a y s o f L e a rn i n g Compared with Statewide Average of Male Students H o u s t o n M a l e S t u d e n t s O v e r a l l 0.00 0 0.05** 27** H o u s t o n C h a r t e r S c h o o l M a l e S t u d e n t s 0.08** 46** 0.15** 86** H o u s t o n M a g n e t S c h o o l M a l e S t u d e n t s 0.09* 51* 0.02 11 H o u s t o n O t h e r D i s t r i c t S c h o o l M a l e S t u d e n t s -0.01 -8 0.03** 20** Compared with Male Students in Other District Schools in Houston H o u s t o n C h a r t e r S c h o o l M a l e S t u d e n t s 0.09** 54** 0.11** 66** H o u s t o n M a g n e t S c h o o l M a l e S t u d e n t s 0.10* 59* -0.02 -9
  • 45. Student Subgroup Analysis> Female Students S i g ni fi c ant a t p < 0 .0 5 * S i g ni fi c ant a t p < 0 .0 1 ** R E A D ING M A T H St a n d a rd D e v i a t i on D a y s o f L e a rn i n g St a n d a rd D e v i a t i on D a y s o f L e a rn i n g Compared with Statewide Average of Female Students H o u s t o n F e m a l e S t u d e n t s O v e r a l l -0.01 -4 0.05** 29** H o u s t o n C h a r t e r S c h o o l F e m a l e S t u d e n t s 0.07** 40** 0.15** 90** H o u s t o n M a g n e t S c h o o l F e m a l e S t u d e n t s 0.15** 87** 0.03 17 H o u s t o n O t h e r D i s t r i c t S c h o o l F e m a l e S t u d e n t s -0.02** -13** 0.04** 21** Compared with Female Students in Other District Schools in Houston H o u s t o n C h a r t e r S c h o o l F e m a l e S t u d e n t s 0.09** 52** 0.12** 69** H o u s t o n M a g n e t S c h o o l F e m a l e S t u d e n t s 0.17** 99** -0.01 -5