SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 1
Microinjection of dopamine antagonists into the nucleus accumbens core
reduces high effort choices during decision making
Maria Shibatsuji, Sara E. Morrison, Saleem Nicola
Dominick P. Purpura Department of Neuroscience, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY 10461
1. Nicola, S.M. The flexible approach hypothesis: unification of effort and
cue- responding hypotheses for the role of nucleus accumbens dopamine
in the activation of reward- seeking behavior. J Neurosci 30, 16585-16600
(2010).
2. Salamone, J.D., Correa, M., Farrar, A. & Mingote, S.M. Effort- related
functions of nucleus accumbens dopamine and associated forebrain
circuits. Psychopharmacology 191, 461- 482 (2007).
3. Walton, M.E., et al. Comparing the role of the anterior cingulate cortex
and 6- hydroxydopamine nucleus accumbens lesions on operant effort-
based decision making. Eur J Neurosci 29, 1678-1691 (2009).
Methods References
Results & Discussion
• Our preliminary results suggest that microinjection of dopamine
antagonists into the NAc core increased rats’ choices of the low
effort / low reward arm on both tasks.
• In the one barrier task, the D1 antagonist and a high dose of the
D2 antagonist decreased high-effort/high-reward choices.
• In the two barrier task, a high dose of the D2 antagonist
decreased high-effort/high-reward choices.
• High doses of the D1 antagonist also increased omitted trials in
several rats (data not shown).
• These results suggest that D2 receptor activation in the nucleus
accumbens might be specifically important for the exertion of
effort to obtain larger rewards. D1 receptor activation, on the
other hand, might be involved more generally in goal-directed
behavior.
Acknowledgements
Studies have suggested that animals conduct cost-benefit analyses in
order to determine if an increased amount of work or risk is worth
undertaking for a higher reward. Dopamine released in the core of
nucleus accumbens (NAc) is thought to play a role in effort-based
decision making by regulating the amount of effort invested for a reward.
While it is established that NAc dopamine is needed to perform high
effort tasks, the underlying neural mechanisms of effort-based decision
making are up for debate.
One hypothesis is that the activation of dopamine receptors directly
influences effort-related decision making (Salamone et al., 2007): the
activation of dopamine receptors allows animals to overcome response
constraints that may prevent them from engaging in high effort tasks.
However, other studies suggest that the effort exerted in order to obtain
reward is not affected by NAc dopamine manipulation (e.g. Walton et al.,
2009), implying that NAc dopamine might not play a specific role in
supporting effort. Instead, we hypothesized that NAc might play a more
general role in goal-directed behavior. In order to test these hypotheses,
high vs low effort preferences were measured using a T-maze after
microinjecting with one of two dopamine antagonists or saline.
Introduction
Financial support was provided by the Summer Undergraduate Research
Program (SURP). We would like to thank David Novy, Ashley Wright, Cindy
Reyes, James Kim, Kevin Caref, and Mo-87 – Mo-94.
Time course of training and experiment
Rat completing 2 vs 1 barrier training
. Paxinos & Watson 2007
During training, rats developed a
preference for the high-effort/high-
reward arm of the T maze
Habituation
4-5 days
Discrimination
Training
7-9 days
1 barrier training
4-6 days
High barrier training
7-9 days
High barrier with
platform training
4-5 days
2 vs 1 barrier
training
4-7 days
Surgery
7 days
Recovery
5-7 days
Microinjections
14 days, every other
day
• Subjects were 8 male rats
• Rats were trained on a T-maze baited
with a large reward (3 sucrose pellets)
in one arm and a small reward (1
pellet) in the other
• Half of the rats were presented with
one barrier in the HR arm and no
barrier in the LR arm (“one-barrier
task”)
• The other half of the rats were
presented with two barriers in the HR
arm and one barrier in the LR arm
(“two-barrier task”)
• Cannula implantation surgery:
Bilateral cannulae were placed into the
NAc core (coordinates in mm relative
to bregma: AP +1.2, ML ± 2) using
standard aseptic procedures
• Prior to being placed in the T-maze,
rats were microinjected in the NAc
core with either a dopamine D1
receptor antagonist (SCH 23390;
“Schering”) or a D2 receptor
antagonist (raclopride)
Vehicle SCH0.5 SCH1 SCH2
RAC1 RAC2 RAC4
%higheffortchoices
One-barrier task: D1 or D2 receptor
blockade reduces high effort choices
Location of cannula placement
%higheffortchoices
Vehicle SCH0.5 SCH1 SCH2
RAC1 RAC2 RAC4
Two-barrier task: D2 receptor
blockade reduces high effort choices
p < 0.1, t-test
p < 0.1, t-test
p < 0.05, t-test
*

More Related Content

What's hot

Zhong Nottingham Jan 2012 [FINAL]
Zhong Nottingham Jan 2012 [FINAL]Zhong Nottingham Jan 2012 [FINAL]
Zhong Nottingham Jan 2012 [FINAL]
Weihao Zhong
 
1 s2.0-s0166432814002770-main
1 s2.0-s0166432814002770-main1 s2.0-s0166432814002770-main
1 s2.0-s0166432814002770-main
Piter Pen
 
EG BSA Poster
EG BSA PosterEG BSA Poster
EG BSA Poster
Emma Gill
 
Roughan et al. (2015) Meloxicam prevents COX-2 mediated post-surgical inflamm...
Roughan et al. (2015) Meloxicam prevents COX-2 mediated post-surgical inflamm...Roughan et al. (2015) Meloxicam prevents COX-2 mediated post-surgical inflamm...
Roughan et al. (2015) Meloxicam prevents COX-2 mediated post-surgical inflamm...
Johnny Roughan
 
PCB Amperometry_NBTS 2012
PCB Amperometry_NBTS 2012PCB Amperometry_NBTS 2012
PCB Amperometry_NBTS 2012
Jenna Fielding
 

What's hot (17)

Ponce, Quintana et al 2011
Ponce, Quintana et al 2011Ponce, Quintana et al 2011
Ponce, Quintana et al 2011
 
Zhong Nottingham Jan 2012 [FINAL]
Zhong Nottingham Jan 2012 [FINAL]Zhong Nottingham Jan 2012 [FINAL]
Zhong Nottingham Jan 2012 [FINAL]
 
CV_JLGC_2015
CV_JLGC_2015CV_JLGC_2015
CV_JLGC_2015
 
Dissertation Presentation
Dissertation PresentationDissertation Presentation
Dissertation Presentation
 
1 s2.0-s0166432814002770-main
1 s2.0-s0166432814002770-main1 s2.0-s0166432814002770-main
1 s2.0-s0166432814002770-main
 
dose response relation
dose response relationdose response relation
dose response relation
 
EG BSA Poster
EG BSA PosterEG BSA Poster
EG BSA Poster
 
Roughan et al. (2015) Meloxicam prevents COX-2 mediated post-surgical inflamm...
Roughan et al. (2015) Meloxicam prevents COX-2 mediated post-surgical inflamm...Roughan et al. (2015) Meloxicam prevents COX-2 mediated post-surgical inflamm...
Roughan et al. (2015) Meloxicam prevents COX-2 mediated post-surgical inflamm...
 
PCB Amperometry_NBTS 2012
PCB Amperometry_NBTS 2012PCB Amperometry_NBTS 2012
PCB Amperometry_NBTS 2012
 
nihms29708
nihms29708nihms29708
nihms29708
 
PCE Poster 2016
PCE Poster 2016PCE Poster 2016
PCE Poster 2016
 
nihms-277379
nihms-277379nihms-277379
nihms-277379
 
Treadmill training in children, by Dr. Asir John Samuel (PT)
Treadmill training in children, by Dr. Asir John Samuel (PT)Treadmill training in children, by Dr. Asir John Samuel (PT)
Treadmill training in children, by Dr. Asir John Samuel (PT)
 
Rescorla, 2006 - Spontaneous recovery from overexpectation
Rescorla, 2006 - Spontaneous recovery from overexpectationRescorla, 2006 - Spontaneous recovery from overexpectation
Rescorla, 2006 - Spontaneous recovery from overexpectation
 
C053013018
C053013018C053013018
C053013018
 
Dose response relationship
Dose response relationshipDose response relationship
Dose response relationship
 
FAAH poster
FAAH poster FAAH poster
FAAH poster
 

Similar to SURP2014_MS

Cason Written Comps
Cason Written CompsCason Written Comps
Cason Written Comps
Jacob Cason
 
Nucleus accumbens Hue and Nick
Nucleus accumbens   Hue and NickNucleus accumbens   Hue and Nick
Nucleus accumbens Hue and Nick
John Crane
 
Neuroeconomic Class
Neuroeconomic ClassNeuroeconomic Class
Neuroeconomic Class
tkvaran
 
Psychological Science21(12) 1770 –1776© The Author(s) 2010.docx
Psychological Science21(12) 1770 –1776© The Author(s) 2010.docxPsychological Science21(12) 1770 –1776© The Author(s) 2010.docx
Psychological Science21(12) 1770 –1776© The Author(s) 2010.docx
woodruffeloisa
 
C. elegans Lab Report FINAL!!!!
C. elegans Lab Report FINAL!!!!C. elegans Lab Report FINAL!!!!
C. elegans Lab Report FINAL!!!!
Kian Bagheri
 
curepsp poster
curepsp postercurepsp poster
curepsp poster
Titus John
 
Neoclomipramine Rat Model Validation
Neoclomipramine Rat Model ValidationNeoclomipramine Rat Model Validation
Neoclomipramine Rat Model Validation
Kirstin Craig
 
Exploring Compensatory Plasticity via Dopamine Depletion on Rats and the Effe...
Exploring Compensatory Plasticity via Dopamine Depletion on Rats and the Effe...Exploring Compensatory Plasticity via Dopamine Depletion on Rats and the Effe...
Exploring Compensatory Plasticity via Dopamine Depletion on Rats and the Effe...
Joshua Rochotte
 
Gorillas’ use of the escape response in object choice memory tests
Gorillas’ use of the escape response in object choice memory testsGorillas’ use of the escape response in object choice memory tests
Gorillas’ use of the escape response in object choice memory tests
Francys Subiaul
 
New microsoft office word document
New microsoft office word documentNew microsoft office word document
New microsoft office word document
harsha979797
 
Interaction between anxiolytic effects of magnesium oxide nanoparticles and e...
Interaction between anxiolytic effects of magnesium oxide nanoparticles and e...Interaction between anxiolytic effects of magnesium oxide nanoparticles and e...
Interaction between anxiolytic effects of magnesium oxide nanoparticles and e...
Nanomedicine Journal (NMJ)
 
POSTER BIOL 499 (Uyen)
POSTER BIOL 499 (Uyen)POSTER BIOL 499 (Uyen)
POSTER BIOL 499 (Uyen)
Uyen Hoang
 
#36417 Topic Discussion 3Number of Pages 1 (Double Spaced).docx
#36417 Topic Discussion 3Number of Pages 1 (Double Spaced).docx#36417 Topic Discussion 3Number of Pages 1 (Double Spaced).docx
#36417 Topic Discussion 3Number of Pages 1 (Double Spaced).docx
AASTHA76
 

Similar to SURP2014_MS (20)

Cason Written Comps
Cason Written CompsCason Written Comps
Cason Written Comps
 
ASEA: Redox Cell Signaling Endurance Study.pdf
ASEA: Redox Cell Signaling Endurance Study.pdfASEA: Redox Cell Signaling Endurance Study.pdf
ASEA: Redox Cell Signaling Endurance Study.pdf
 
Ranking of memories
Ranking of memoriesRanking of memories
Ranking of memories
 
Nucleus accumbens Hue and Nick
Nucleus accumbens   Hue and NickNucleus accumbens   Hue and Nick
Nucleus accumbens Hue and Nick
 
Neuroeconomic Class
Neuroeconomic ClassNeuroeconomic Class
Neuroeconomic Class
 
fnsys-09-00015
fnsys-09-00015fnsys-09-00015
fnsys-09-00015
 
fnsys-09-00015
fnsys-09-00015fnsys-09-00015
fnsys-09-00015
 
Psychological Science21(12) 1770 –1776© The Author(s) 2010.docx
Psychological Science21(12) 1770 –1776© The Author(s) 2010.docxPsychological Science21(12) 1770 –1776© The Author(s) 2010.docx
Psychological Science21(12) 1770 –1776© The Author(s) 2010.docx
 
C. elegans Lab Report FINAL!!!!
C. elegans Lab Report FINAL!!!!C. elegans Lab Report FINAL!!!!
C. elegans Lab Report FINAL!!!!
 
SynapticPlasticity
SynapticPlasticitySynapticPlasticity
SynapticPlasticity
 
Ncm2019
Ncm2019Ncm2019
Ncm2019
 
curepsp poster
curepsp postercurepsp poster
curepsp poster
 
Neoclomipramine Rat Model Validation
Neoclomipramine Rat Model ValidationNeoclomipramine Rat Model Validation
Neoclomipramine Rat Model Validation
 
Exploring Compensatory Plasticity via Dopamine Depletion on Rats and the Effe...
Exploring Compensatory Plasticity via Dopamine Depletion on Rats and the Effe...Exploring Compensatory Plasticity via Dopamine Depletion on Rats and the Effe...
Exploring Compensatory Plasticity via Dopamine Depletion on Rats and the Effe...
 
Gorillas’ use of the escape response in object choice memory tests
Gorillas’ use of the escape response in object choice memory testsGorillas’ use of the escape response in object choice memory tests
Gorillas’ use of the escape response in object choice memory tests
 
New microsoft office word document
New microsoft office word documentNew microsoft office word document
New microsoft office word document
 
Interaction between anxiolytic effects of magnesium oxide nanoparticles and e...
Interaction between anxiolytic effects of magnesium oxide nanoparticles and e...Interaction between anxiolytic effects of magnesium oxide nanoparticles and e...
Interaction between anxiolytic effects of magnesium oxide nanoparticles and e...
 
Science and performance
Science and performanceScience and performance
Science and performance
 
POSTER BIOL 499 (Uyen)
POSTER BIOL 499 (Uyen)POSTER BIOL 499 (Uyen)
POSTER BIOL 499 (Uyen)
 
#36417 Topic Discussion 3Number of Pages 1 (Double Spaced).docx
#36417 Topic Discussion 3Number of Pages 1 (Double Spaced).docx#36417 Topic Discussion 3Number of Pages 1 (Double Spaced).docx
#36417 Topic Discussion 3Number of Pages 1 (Double Spaced).docx
 

SURP2014_MS

  • 1. Microinjection of dopamine antagonists into the nucleus accumbens core reduces high effort choices during decision making Maria Shibatsuji, Sara E. Morrison, Saleem Nicola Dominick P. Purpura Department of Neuroscience, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY 10461 1. Nicola, S.M. The flexible approach hypothesis: unification of effort and cue- responding hypotheses for the role of nucleus accumbens dopamine in the activation of reward- seeking behavior. J Neurosci 30, 16585-16600 (2010). 2. Salamone, J.D., Correa, M., Farrar, A. & Mingote, S.M. Effort- related functions of nucleus accumbens dopamine and associated forebrain circuits. Psychopharmacology 191, 461- 482 (2007). 3. Walton, M.E., et al. Comparing the role of the anterior cingulate cortex and 6- hydroxydopamine nucleus accumbens lesions on operant effort- based decision making. Eur J Neurosci 29, 1678-1691 (2009). Methods References Results & Discussion • Our preliminary results suggest that microinjection of dopamine antagonists into the NAc core increased rats’ choices of the low effort / low reward arm on both tasks. • In the one barrier task, the D1 antagonist and a high dose of the D2 antagonist decreased high-effort/high-reward choices. • In the two barrier task, a high dose of the D2 antagonist decreased high-effort/high-reward choices. • High doses of the D1 antagonist also increased omitted trials in several rats (data not shown). • These results suggest that D2 receptor activation in the nucleus accumbens might be specifically important for the exertion of effort to obtain larger rewards. D1 receptor activation, on the other hand, might be involved more generally in goal-directed behavior. Acknowledgements Studies have suggested that animals conduct cost-benefit analyses in order to determine if an increased amount of work or risk is worth undertaking for a higher reward. Dopamine released in the core of nucleus accumbens (NAc) is thought to play a role in effort-based decision making by regulating the amount of effort invested for a reward. While it is established that NAc dopamine is needed to perform high effort tasks, the underlying neural mechanisms of effort-based decision making are up for debate. One hypothesis is that the activation of dopamine receptors directly influences effort-related decision making (Salamone et al., 2007): the activation of dopamine receptors allows animals to overcome response constraints that may prevent them from engaging in high effort tasks. However, other studies suggest that the effort exerted in order to obtain reward is not affected by NAc dopamine manipulation (e.g. Walton et al., 2009), implying that NAc dopamine might not play a specific role in supporting effort. Instead, we hypothesized that NAc might play a more general role in goal-directed behavior. In order to test these hypotheses, high vs low effort preferences were measured using a T-maze after microinjecting with one of two dopamine antagonists or saline. Introduction Financial support was provided by the Summer Undergraduate Research Program (SURP). We would like to thank David Novy, Ashley Wright, Cindy Reyes, James Kim, Kevin Caref, and Mo-87 – Mo-94. Time course of training and experiment Rat completing 2 vs 1 barrier training . Paxinos & Watson 2007 During training, rats developed a preference for the high-effort/high- reward arm of the T maze Habituation 4-5 days Discrimination Training 7-9 days 1 barrier training 4-6 days High barrier training 7-9 days High barrier with platform training 4-5 days 2 vs 1 barrier training 4-7 days Surgery 7 days Recovery 5-7 days Microinjections 14 days, every other day • Subjects were 8 male rats • Rats were trained on a T-maze baited with a large reward (3 sucrose pellets) in one arm and a small reward (1 pellet) in the other • Half of the rats were presented with one barrier in the HR arm and no barrier in the LR arm (“one-barrier task”) • The other half of the rats were presented with two barriers in the HR arm and one barrier in the LR arm (“two-barrier task”) • Cannula implantation surgery: Bilateral cannulae were placed into the NAc core (coordinates in mm relative to bregma: AP +1.2, ML ± 2) using standard aseptic procedures • Prior to being placed in the T-maze, rats were microinjected in the NAc core with either a dopamine D1 receptor antagonist (SCH 23390; “Schering”) or a D2 receptor antagonist (raclopride) Vehicle SCH0.5 SCH1 SCH2 RAC1 RAC2 RAC4 %higheffortchoices One-barrier task: D1 or D2 receptor blockade reduces high effort choices Location of cannula placement %higheffortchoices Vehicle SCH0.5 SCH1 SCH2 RAC1 RAC2 RAC4 Two-barrier task: D2 receptor blockade reduces high effort choices p < 0.1, t-test p < 0.1, t-test p < 0.05, t-test *