6. PATHOPHYSIOLOGY
• VOLUME LOAD – COMPENSATORY
MECHANISMS
– LV END DIASTOLIC VOLUME INCREASES TO
ACCOMMODATE REGURGITANT VOLUME
– ALONG WITH INCREASE IN CHAMBER
COMPLIANCE
– HENCE, THERE IS NO INCREASE IN DIASTOLIC
FILLING PRESSURE
7. Cont..
– INCREASE IN EDV INCREASE TOTAL STROKE
VOLUME
– HENCE, FORWARD STROKE VOLUME MAINTAINED
WITHIN NORMAL RANGE
– ALSO, ADAPTATION TO VOLUME OVERLOAD IS BY
NEW SARCOMERES CAUSING “ECCENTRIC LV
HYPERTROPHY”
10. Cont..
• THUS “AR – CHRONIC” IS A CONDITION OF
COMBINED
– VOLUME OVERLOAD
– PRESSURE OVERLOAD
• HENCE THERE IS BOTH –
– ECCENTRIC HYPERTROPHY
– CONCENTRIC HYPERTROPHY
11. POINTS TO NOTE -
• DUE TO COMPENSATORY PROCESSES-
– PATIENT MAY REMAIN ASYMPTOMATIC FOR
DECADES
– AFTER LOAD REDUCTION THERAPY HAS
POTENTIAL TO REDUCE DEGREE OF
REGURGITATION VIA –
• REDUCES AFTERLOAD AND COMPENSATORY
DILATATION AND HYPERTROPHY
12. Cont..
• In some patients compensatory process
cannot be maintained for long
• Results in LV systolic dysfunction
• Symptoms of dyspnoea and fatigue often
develops at this transition point.
• Process is mostly insiduos
13. IMPORTANT TO NOTE
LV SYSTOLIC
DYSFUNCTION
AFTERLOAD
MISMATCH
REVERSIBLE
AVR CAUSES
COMPLETE
REVERSAL
IMPAIRED
MYOCARDIAL
CONTRACTILITY
IRREVERSIBLE
14. NATURAL HISTORY
• It can be divided into -
– Patients with normal LV systolic function
– Patients with LV systolic dysfunction
15. With normal LV Systolic function
• These patients remain asymptomatic for
decades.
• Charecterised by very gradual rate of
deterioration to symtoms.
• Likelihood of developing symptoms – 4.3%/yr
• Average mortality rate – 0.2%/yr
16. Cont ..
• Most important aspect of evaluation – detailed
history.
• However, 25% pt may decompensate without
significant history.
• Implies the importance of noninvasive evaluation.
• Factors associated with high risk –
– Age
– Lved - >50mm – 19% , 40-50mm – 6%, <40mm -nil
– LVes
17. With LV systolic dysfunction
• Much more aggressive natural history.
• Become candidate for operation because of
symptoms, within a few years.
• If asymp symptomatic , require operation
within 2-3 years.
18. Clinical presentation
• Absence of complications, asymptomatic for
decades
• May have some episodes of orthostatic dizziness
• May be aware of increased vigor of contraction of
lv while lying down or audible heart tones.
• May have anginal pain –
– Low aortic diastolic pressure and inc myocardial
demands
– Atherosclerosis
– Luetic
19. Cont ..
• CHF – Most common symptom
• LV failure precedes RV failure.
• Decreased exercise tolerance, dyspnoea.
• Orthopnea , PND
• Dyspnoea may be releived with eventual RV
failure without TR.
• Palpitations – usually not due to arrythmia
20. Cont ..
• Complications which may worsen porgnosis –
– Infectious endocarditis
– Ostial narrowing
– Co-existing CAD
– Atrial or ventricular arrythmias
21. Physical Findings
• DBP low.
• Kortokoff sounds may be heard even when the
cuff pressure reaches zero
• Wide pulse pressure.
• Sinus tachycardia.
• Apical impulse is displaced to left and below its
usual location
• Murmur – soft, blowing, holodiastolic,
decresendo
22. Cont ..
• Duration of murmur related to severity.
• Systolic ejection murmur may be present.
• Carotid thrill is present in considerable
number of patients.
• Austin Flint Murmur – late diastolic rumbling
murmur
34. INVESTIGATIONS
• ECG –
– LEFT VENTRICULAR PREPONDERANCE
– SMALL Q, TALL R, ISOELECTRIC ST SEG. AND
UPRIGHT T – DIASTOLIC OVERLOAD
– ST DEPRESSION, T INVERSION – SYSTOLIC
OVERLOAD
– AR SEC. TO INFLAMTORY PROCESS – BLOCKS,
LONG PR ETC
37. ECHO
• IN ABSENCE OF MITRAL DISEASE – BROAD
BAND OF (3-4MM) DIASTOLIC FLUTTER (20-
70HZ) OR VIBRATION OF ANTERIOR MITRAL
LEAFLET.
• MITRAL VALVE CLOSURE PRIOR TO QRS.
• DIALATED AORTIC ROOT
• LVED, LVES DIMENSIONS, EF
• DOPPLER TECHNIQUE
38.
39.
40.
41. CARDIAC CATH
• HAEMODYNAMIC MEASUREMENTS
• WITH SEVERE DECOMPENSATION – LT
VENTRICULAR END DIASTOLIC AND AORTIC
DIASTOLIC PRESSURES EQUALISE
• LEFT VENTRICULOGRAPHY –
– INC EDV
– ECCENTRIC LVH
– REDUCED CONTRACTILE FUNCTION
– ABNORMAL END SYSTOLIC VOLUME AND END
SYSTOLIC PRESSURE RELATIONSHIP
42. CONT..
• MORE ACCURATE METHOD – CALCULATE
REGURGITANT FRACTION
• REGURG FRACTION = TOTAL CO FROM LEFT
VENTRICULOGRAM – FORWARD CO BY FICK
TECHNIQUE
– MILD TO MOD- <0.50
• SEVERE - >0.50
43. THERAPY
• MOST IMPORTANT DETERMINANT –
– PREOP LV SYSTOLIC FUNCTION
– OTHERS –
– FRACTIONAL SHORTENING
– END SYSTOLIC DIMENSIONS
44. ROLE OF VASODILATOR THERAPY
• REDUCE REGURGITANT VOLUME HENCE –
– REDUCE LVed, WALL STRESS, AFTERLOAD
• MAINLY DRUGS USED ARE –
– SNP
– HYDRALAZINE
– NIFEDIPINE
• RATIONALE – BENEFICIAL HAEMODYNAMICS SHOULD
TRANSLATE TO PROLONGATED COMPENSATED PHASE
• MAY RESULT ONLY AS “COSMETIC EFFECT”
• EVEN SLIGHTLY DEPRESSED LV FUNCTION NECESSITATE AVR
• REMEMBER, ITS NOT AN ALTERNATIVE TO AVR
45. INDICATION FOR AVR
• AVR, ONLY IF THE DEGREE IS SEVERE
• LV DYSFUNCTION – AVR
• CO EXISTING CONDITION – AVR
• ONSET OF TRUE CARDIAC SYMPTOMS EVEN
MILD – AVR
• A DEC IN EF DURING EXERCISE IS A VERY NON
SPECIFIC FINDING.