2. 2
Ø The purpose for this analysis was to identify a
metric as a tool to understand the progress of glove
box removal at the PFP site, specifically RMA/RMC
Lines.
Ø Initial analysis revealed re-occurring or
systemic situations which stopped work, and or
caused a work shift to be missed.
Ø Further analysis categorized these situations to
provide a specific breakdown for cost and
duration impacts to the project.
3. } Cost & Duration Impacts
◦ RMA/RMC teams, as a whole operation, are
preforming at an efficiency rate of 68%.
◦ This equates to adding an average of 33.5 shifts a
month or 2 ½ weeks to the overall project scope.
◦ Missing shifts at such a level, at cost of $33,771 per
shift, equates to a cost of $1,144,580 to the overall
project after each month.
◦ After 7 months the aggregate running total is
$8,012,059
◦ (This figure does not take overtime or its effects into account)
3
4. 4
MR
CONSUMPTION
Funding
Source
MR
Funding
FY
12
ARRA
$1,686,227
BASE
$2,393,015
Total
Reserved
$4,079,242
Total
Cost
Realized
by
Contractor
$3,756,972
Total
FY12
MR
Remaining
$322,270
Categories
of
Cause
Aggregate
Cost/
Cause
TOTAL
Shi4s
Missed/Cause
Project
Management
$
4,170,661
123.5
Externali?es
$
2,845,168
84.25
New
Contamina?on
$
911,804
27
Training
$
84,426
2.5
Over?me
$
5,268,204
104
Total
Cost
$
13,195,843
237.25
5. 5
Remaining
MR
Per
Month
Remaining
FY12
MR
Ini?al
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
$
4,079,242
$
3,471,373
$
3,083,011
$
2,525,798
$
2,255,633
$
1,158,091
$
955,468
$
322,270
$4,079,242
$3,471,373
$3,083,011
$2,525,798
$2,255,633
$1,158,091
$955,468
$0
$250,000
$500,000
$750,000
$1,000,000
$1,250,000
$1,500,000
$1,750,000
$2,000,000
$2,250,000
$2,500,000
$2,750,000
$3,000,000
$3,250,000
$3,500,000
$3,750,000
$4,000,000
$4,250,000
Ini?al
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Remaining
MR
6. 6
Efficeincy
RaMng
(No
OT)
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Avg
RMA/RMC
Teams
228A/B
78.9%
75.0%
77.8%
59.3%
51.6%
84.2%
81.6%
72.6%
230A/228C
81.6%
77.8%
91.7%
74.1%
54.8%
97.4%
72.4%
78.5%
230B
76.3%
75.0%
86.1%
70.4%
61.3%
57.9%
52.6%
68.5%
235B
52.6%
69.4%
5.6%
29.6%
16.1%
42.1%
81.6%
42.4%
235A-‐2
78.9%
30.6%
80.6%
74.1%
64.5%
68.4%
57.9%
65.0%
235A-‐3
78.9%
94.4%
52.8%
85.2%
64.5%
92.1%
71.1%
77.0%
Avg
74.6%
70.4%
65.7%
65.4%
52.2%
73.7%
69.5%
67.4%
40.0%
45.0%
50.0%
55.0%
60.0%
65.0%
70.0%
75.0%
80.0%
85.0%
90.0%
95.0%
100.0%
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aggregate
RMA/RMC
Efficiency
Trend
Avg
11. } Project Management issues and external
factors are causing the bulk of reoccurring
issues
} If left unmitigated the project will deplete its
management reserve by the end of August FY
12.
11