We all know the labor market is tight! What are you doing to attract and retain top talent? This case study shows the impact of a wage realignment at one of our customers and the positive effect it is having on their turnover, attendance and overall cost savings. I would love the opportunity to discuss how we can create a customized contingent labor solution for you and your organization. What we do is different! Click on the link below to view the entire case study.
More than Just Lines on a Map: Best Practices for U.S Bike Routes
1. wage realignment impact (1)
1. Interpretation:
• Average attrition has improved from 6.36% Q2 to 3.75% Q3.
• Involuntary terminations represent 61% of all terminations, an increase from Q2. While a balance closer
to 50/50% involuntary to voluntary mix is desirable, this increase is caused by a substantial reduction in
talent walking off or abandoning their jobs, a positive change.
Wage Realignment Impact
Q-3 Attrition Average = 3.75%
1
2. Average weekly
occurrence (incl. SDO)
per shift:
1st: 2.31
2nd: 3.85
3rd: 3.15
Total Call Outs per
shift
1st: 7
2nd: 15
3rd: 8
Interpretation:
• Scheduled Day Off is an approved absence and these have been included because they may affect production.
• Total call out reduction of 16% - from 36 Q2 to 30 Q3; 34 occurrences (28%) by talent no longer employed.
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
7/3 7/107/177/247/31 8/7 8/148/218/28 9/4 9/119/189/25
2nd Shift
SDO
NCNS
LA
CO
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
7/3 7/107/177/247/31 8/7 8/148/218/28 9/4 9/119/189/25
1st Shift
SDO
NCNS
LA
CO
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
7/3 7/107/177/247/31 8/7 8/148/218/28 9/4 9/119/189/25
3rd Shift
SDO
NCNS
LA
CO
Wage Realignment Impact
Q-3 Attendance Average = 99.2%
2
3. Total cost of turnover determined using 4 cost buckets and the average
weekly turnover by position for the quarter
1. Training Cost: Dollar value calculated for both talent and mentor/trainer hours with
0% productivity
2. Fill Time Cost: Dollar value calculated for time needed to fill position based on
overtime used to cover production gap
3. Onboarding Cost: Dollar value assigned to client-incurred onboarding cost
4. Waste Cost: Dollar value will also be assigned to waste – Q1 2017
Bagger: turnover reduction
(3.79 to 2.08 talent)
$ 25,813.88
Core operator: turnover
reduction
(.28 to .15 talent)
$ 9,872.93
Q-3 Total Cost Savings $ 35,686.81
Wage Realignment Impact
Cost savings analysis
3
Editor's Notes
Cost of turnover
Bagger: $1161
Bill rate calculated using Q3 active average bill rate for this position
Mentor cost estimated using average wage for this position ($10.99) +$1 * 130%
Core operator: $5842
Bill rate calculated using Q3 active average bill rate for this position
Mentor cost estimated using average wage for this position ($13.27) +$1 * 130%
Mechanically inclined to pick up core operator; physical aspect;