Joseph Sheffu - Ethics and Governance for Professionals.pptx
1. Ethics & Governance for
Professional Accountants
Paper presented by CPA Joseph Sheffu
NBAA Seminar on Accounting &
Auditing Issues
3rd – 6th Feb.2021
Malaika Beach Resort & Hotel - Mwanza
2. Agenda
Accounting and the Society
Public Interest Framework
Ethics – Overview of Code of Ethics for Professional
Accountants
Governance Principles
IFAC’s Good Practice Guidance on our role
titled “Evaluating and Improving Governance
in Organisations, 2009”
4. Accounting and the Society
What Is the Accountancy Profession For?
We support market systems and economy
Technocrats and trusted advisors
Society needs information and advice that supports
important decisions that affect organisations, people
and their lives, and society as a whole
With the privileges and benefits that accompany CPA
status come a variety of obligations, foremost of which
is the obligation to put the good of society ahead of
personal interests.
5. Accounting and the Society
What Is the Accountancy Profession For?
Provide, analyse, interpret information to management for
formulation of strategy, planning, decision-making and control
Measuring performance, record financial transactions and
communicate to stakeholders
Managing risks, providing internal control and business
assurance
Creating value through effective use of resources (financial
and non financial) through (a) understanding of drivers of value
to stakeholders and (b) organisational innovation
6. Accounting and the Society
What Is the Accountancy Profession For?
An understanding of ethics and governance is essential
to CPAs.
If CPA are to effectively support management in
discharging their stewardship functions then they should
demonstrate a deeper better understanding of ethics
and corporate governance frameworks and mechanisms
and be proficient in regulatory regimes, compliance
requirements to ensure lawful, ethical and effective
corporate behavior and operations.
7. Accounting and the Society
What Is the Accountancy Profession For?
Should have knowledge to identify and resolve
professional and ethical issues
Should beware of pressures that can them in their
working life
Should know what one must do to promote the
confidence and trust of society and hence fulfils the role
as a positive social force
8. Public Interest Obligation
The accounting profession is the clearest and most
important case of a profession whose role is paramount for
the economic function; whose commitment to the public
interest is an explicit responsibility; and whose
“professionalism” is embedded and articulated in its Code of
Ethics.
The effects of ethical behavior in accounting are far
reaching in the economy.
For sustainability of our profession depends on a our Ethical
conduct. Be seen and be perceived as ethical. Making
judgments that embody ethical fundamental principles
9. IFAC’s Public Interest Framework (3 criteria)
Must be mindful of the wider economic, political, and
cultural implications of our work.
Serving the public interest should be evaluated against 3
criteria. Enabling us to assess whether or not (and the
degree to which) any policy, action, process or condition is
in the public interest.
1. Consideration of costs and benefits for society as a
whole
2. Adherence to democratic principles and processes
3. Respect for cultural and ethical diversity
10. IFAC’s Public Interest Framework (3 criteria)
All 3 criteria must be met for us to conclude public
interest is served.
However, the three criteria may not always be met to the
same degree, in which case determining what is in the
public interest involves a balance, or trade-off, between
the three.
11. What is “Interest” - are all things valued by
society.
Providing sound financial and business reporting to
stakeholders - all parties in the marketplace directly and
indirectly impacted by that reporting;
Facilitating the comparability of financial reporting and
auditing across different jurisdictions;
Reducing economic uncertainty in the marketplace and
throughout the financial infrastructure (e.g., banking,
insurance, investment firms, etc.);
Requiring that CPAs apply high standards of ethical behavior
and professional judgment
12. What is “Interest” - are all things valued by
society.
Specifying appropriate educational requirements and
qualifications for CPAs (NBAA emanated from public interest);
CPAs to enable governments and public sector organizations to
provide their constituencies with sound fiscal information and
decision-making; and
Providing CPAs in business with the knowledge, judgment, and
the means to contribute to sound corporate governance and
performance management for the organizations they serve.
13. Some societal challenges CPAs face
Public higher expectations of our role, can be unfair
Flawed/outdated laws and regulations e.g. Public Finance &
Tax statutes that have “gaps”
Political interference and lack of appreciation of our role
Ineffective Board/Oversight Boards
Human Capital deficiency, e.g. Parliamentarians, no CPAs
Bureaucracy in public services delivery;
Corruption, state capture
Lack of whistleblower protection
14. Have strong influence, powerful role,
can be abused
CPA are part of the chain of Command
Direct involved in the preparation of strategic plans,
budgets, procurement plans, forecasts and projections
Being part of the Approval Process for major finance
activities
Being part of the Authorised Signatories signing Cheques
even where one is not an approver of the spending
15. Have strong influence, powerful role,
can be abused
Enabler/Disabler of Fraud; by our action or inaction
Direct involved in preparation of financial reports aimed
for other users. Messengers of good or bad news
Forefront in the design, implementation of defense
systems
Cut across all operations. Called upon to help support answer
queries by Board, oversight
16. Ethical Dilemmas, Examples
Temptations to manipulate financial results – drivers:
Incentive, valuation gains, dividends, competition –
market leadership, avoid back consequences e.g. breach
of debt covenants
CEO/CFO instructing subordinate employee (revenue
accountant) to record revenue transaction in an incorrect
manner e.g. ignoring cut-off to boost revenues for the
current year end. Management receives a bonus for the
boosted revenue and the subordinate receives
recognition in an upcoming performance review.
17. Ethical Dilemmas, Examples
Breach of laws and regulations e.g. Tax laws, involuntary due to
cash flows, voluntary due to other incentives
Our business tends to have net VAT input position each month
meaning we always have to pay VAT to TRA. Our debtors mostly
Government institutions do not pay us timely whereas we have
to pay net VAT input within 17 days of end of month regardless
of whether our debtors have paid us. Failure to remit VAT
timely would result in punitive financial penalty. Pretty unfair
since TRA is part of the Government who owes us money.
CFO dilemma is whether to quantify the penalty and accrue as
liability and later settle with TRA or ignore until found out by
TRA? Should the Board be made aware of the actions?
18. IESBA’s New Code of Ethics for Professional
Accountants (June 2019)
19. IESBA’s New Code of Ethics for Professional
Accountants (June 2019)
Authorised Spending
20. Overarching Requirements (ORs) /
5+1 Fundamental Principles (FP)
THE
CONCEPTUAL
FRAMEWORK
Integrity
Objectivity Confidentiality
Professional
Behavior
Independence
Prof.
Competence
& Due Care
21. Enhanced Conceptual Framework
Dedicated provisions
that apply to all
CPAs, in all
circumstances when
dealing with Ethics
& Independence
(E/I)
Establishing
exhaustive list of all
E/I circumstances is
impractical
Evaluate
Threats
Address
Threats
Identify
Threat
• Exercise
professional
judgement
• Remain alert for
new information
and changes in
facts and
circumstances
• Use the reasonable
and informed third
party test
25. Key Enhancements to Conceptual Framework
Identified threats that are not at acceptable level must be
addressed in one of the 3 ways:
Eliminate the circumstances creating threats
Apply safeguards; or
Decline or end engagement/activity
Emphasis that if threats cannot be addressed, CPA must decline
or stop
New requirements to “step back” in forming overall conclusion
26. Other substantive revisions – CPA-IBs
Preparing and presentation of information
More comprehensive provisions addressing CPA-IBs’
responsibilities when preparing or presenting information
Prohibition on exercising discretion when preparing or
presenting information with intent to mislead or inappropriate
influence contractual or regulatory outcomes
Enhanced guidance to assist CPA-IB in disassociating from
misleading information
27. Other substantive revisions – CPA-IBs
Pressure to Breach Fundamental Principles
Prohibition on allowing pressure
from others to result in a breach of
Fundamental principles
Prohibition on placing pressure on
others that would lead them to
breach Fundamental Principles
Guidance to assist in navigating
situations involving pressure
Give examples of ‘Pressure’ Red
Flags
28. Other substantive revisions – CPA-IBs & CPA-PPs
Inducements, Incl. Gift & Hospitality
Clarifications about appropriate
boundaries for offering and
accepting of inducements
Prohibition on offering or accepting
inducements with intent to
improperly influence behavior
Application of conceptual framework
when no actual or perceived
improper intent
29. Other substantive revisions – Independence
Long Association
Strengthen general provisions addressing long association
A strengthened Partner rotation regime for PIE audits,
including:
Extant Revised
7 years time-on: all KAPs No change
2 years cooling-off: all KAPs
5 years cooling-off: EP
3 years cooling-off: EQCR
2 years cooling-off: KAPs
30. Other substantive revisions
Applicability of CPA-IB provisions to CPA-PPs
New requirement and clearer guidance for CPA-PPs that
relevant CPA-IB provisions in Part 2 are applicable to them
when they perform professional activities pursuant to their
relationship with the Firm, whether as:
Whether as contractor, employees or owners of the firm
Illustrations of situations in which provision in part 2 apply to a
CPA-PP.
31. Other substantive revisions
Professional judgement and professional Scepticism
New guidance:
For all CPAs to emphasize the
importance of obtaining an
understanding of the facts and
circumstances when exercising
professional judgement
For CPA-PP - that explains how
compliance with the FPs supports
the exercise of professional
skepticism
32. Examples of threats -CPAIB & CPAPP
CPAIB CPAPP
Conflict of Interest X X
Preparation and presentation of Information X
Acting with Sufficient Expertise X
Financial Interests, Compensation, Incentives linkedX X
Inducements, Gifts & Hospitality X X
Responding to NOCLAR X
Pressure to Breach Fundamental Principles X
33. Examples of threats -Unique to CPAPP
Second Opinion X
Fees and Other Type of Remunerations X
Custody of Client's Assets X
Actual & Threatened Litigation X
Business Relationship X
Family and Personal Relationship X
Recent Services with Audit Client X
Serving as Director X
Employments with Client X
Temporary Assignments X
Long Association of Personnel with audit client X
34. Examples of threats - CPAPP
NON AUDIT SERVICES – largely prohibited – with
exceptions
Accounting & Booking X
Administrative Support X
Valuation services X
Tax services X
Internal Audit X
IT Services X
Litigation support X
Legal services X
Recruitment services X
Corporate Finance X
36. Understanding the Accountant’s Role
in Corporate Governance
Accountants are the Promoters, Enforcers and
Gatekeepers of Good Corporate Governance
and Financial Reporting
IFAC had developed a Good Practice Guidance
on our role titled “Evaluating and Improving
Governance in Organisations, 2009”
37. Understanding the Accountant’s Role
in Corporate Governance
Different organisation take different culture and
approach to corporate governance
Various Corporate Governance frameworks have been
developed locally and internationally
Good corporate governance is generally linked to good
corporate performance
38. Governance: Conformity Vs. Performance
Most organisation have governance structures in place
At its basic, they focus on Conformity with Laws and
Regulations
However, intention is to also focus in enabling
organisation to improve performance
Good Corporate Governance is creating a balance
between Conformity and Performance
Successful organisation adhere to good corporate
governance principles, periodical evaluate, benchmark
against frameworks, best practices evolve with changes
in environment
39. Governance Framework - Definitions
Governance: set of responsibilities and practices
exercised by the board and executive management
(Governing body) with goals to (i) provide strategic
direction (ii) ensuring objectives are met (iii) manage
risks (iv) responsible utilisation of resources
Conformity: compliance with laws, regulations, best
practices, codes and provide assurance to stakeholders in
general
Performance: policies and procedures that (a) focus on
opportunities and risks, strategy, value creation, and
resource utilisation, and (b) guide an organisation’s
decision-making.
40. Governance Framework
Principle-based guidance
framework composed of
two dimensions i.e. the
Performance &
Conformance which
together they represent
the entire value
creation, resource
utilisation, and
accountability framework
of an organisation
Both historical and
forward looking
41. Governance Framework:
Conformance
Concerning with Compliance with laws and regulations
Concerning risk management – strategic, tactical and
operational policies
Focusing on achieving goals – effectively and efficiently
Systems for financial and non financial reporting works
Management fiduciary responsibilities met
Fraud, criminal preventions
42. Governance Framework:
Performance
Organisation is a business – must make profits,
create/add value/wealth, return to stakeholders
Establish robust decision-making process, incl.
determination of risk appetite. Oversight strategy
implementation
Alignment of business operations, models, resource
utilisation with strategic direction and organisation’s
risk appetite
Reacting to changing dynamics
43. 12 Key Principles (IFAC guidance)
1. The creation and optimization of sustainable stakeholder value
should be the objective of governance.
2. Good governance should appropriately balance the interests of
stakeholders.
3. The performance and conformance dimensions of governance are
both important to optimize stakeholder value.
4. Good governance should be fully integrated into the organization.
5. The governing body should be properly constituted and
structured to achieve an appropriate balance between performance
and conformance.
44. 12 Key Principles (IFAC guidance)
6. The governing body should establish a set of fundamental
values by which the organization operates.
7. The governing body should understand the organization’s
business model, its operating environment, and how sustainable
stakeholder value is created and optimized.
8. The governing body should provide strategic direction and
oversight in both the performance and conformance dimensions.
9. Effective and efficient enterprise risk management should
form an integral part of an organization’s governance system.
10. Resource utilization should align with strategic direction.
45. 12 Key Principles (IFAC guidance)
11. The governing body should periodically measure and
evaluate the organization’s strategic direction and
business operations, and follow up with appropriate actions
to ensure appropriate progress and continued alignment with
objectives.
12. The governing body should ensure that reasonable
demands from stakeholders for information are met, and
that the information provided is relevant, understandable,
and reliable.
46. Conclusion
Most Corporate failures globally are attributed to
Corporate Governance failure including unethical
conduct
CPAs should always be conscious of their unique public
interest obligations
CPAs should understand that they serves two masters –
the profession Vs. what is expected by their employers
CPAs have to be conscious of their individual actions or
inaction and implication to the profession as a whole
47. Conclusion
All should regularly update and enhance their
knowledge of emerging Ethics and Corporate Governance
developments
The International Code of Ethics for Professional
Accountants, including International Independence
Standards, establishes the standard of behavior
expected of a CPA. That is our public interest
responsibility.
We should regularly evaluate our organisations for
effectiveness in these aspects
Editor's Notes
CPAs are less involved in traditional accounting functions and are more involved with leadership and management.
CPAs providing key support to senior management and are directly involved in many important decisions.
Sustainability of our profession, our business first and foremost depends on a our Ethical conduct. Society, economies look at us, we must not only be seen to be ethical, and must also be perceived as ethical, by the social we serve. Being ethical means simply to make judgments that embody ethical fundamental principles and reflect public interest goals. Being perceived as ethical means, in effect, that behavior is seen as above reproach and trustworthy.
The 1st criterion requires us to assess the public interest in terms of negative and positive outcomes (costs and benefits) for society as a whole, recognizing that the accountancy profession through its actions has an impact on people, organizations, capital markets, and governments. The 2nd criterion requires us to assess a decision or action taken in the public interest as a democratic process―something which must contain certain qualities of governance, public participation, and public accountability. The 3rd criterion requires us to assess the extent to which any public interest issue or policy can be applied appropriately and interpreted consistently from one society or jurisdiction to the next. In general, we argue that the public interest is not served unless all three criteria are met, at least to some degree. However, it must also be recognized that the three criteria may not always be met to the same degree, in which case determining what is in the public interest involves a balance, or trade-off, between the three.
The 1st criterion requires us to assess the public interest in terms of negative and positive outcomes (costs and benefits) for society as a whole, recognizing that the accountancy profession through its actions has an impact on people, organizations, capital markets, and governments. The 2nd criterion requires us to assess a decision or action taken in the public interest as a democratic process―something which must contain certain qualities of governance, public participation, and public accountability. The 3rd criterion requires us to assess the extent to which any public interest issue or policy can be applied appropriately and interpreted consistently from one society or jurisdiction to the next. In general, we argue that the public interest is not served unless all three criteria are met, at least to some degree. However, it must also be recognized that the three criteria may not always be met to the same degree, in which case determining what is in the public interest involves a balance, or trade-off, between the three.
Public higher expectations: Junk of all trades. When a company fail; major corruption scandal at a company; procurement failure; our roles is called into question
Often times we encounter situations where we wished laws and regulations would have addressed but they are not. E.g. gaps in Tax laws allowing tax avoidance
Tax laws or regulatory laws not recognising IFRS, or accounting principles e.g. leasing as Fixed Asset and
Protracted, long overdue court ruling making difficult to determine accruals or provisions
Board/oversight Boards not doing their first defence role, leaving it all to the accountant or their auditors
Politicians who cares less of accounting principles – IFRS, want to bend rules to suit political motives
Client lacking sound accounting/IFRS knowledge, keeping unqualified staff
Corruption undermines transparency, may lead to material misstatements