1. J
S
B
U
P
J
e
t
s
a
G
P
5
M
c
r
i
e
T
I
T
S
M
o
L
S
D
M
o
L
M
p
f
D
M
b
b
b
b
f
JOSÉ F.
Senior Brid
Bachelor of S
University of
Professional
José Tejidor
experience in
the lead on
substructure
application o
Girder Desig
Plate Girder
51) and Fram
Mr. Tejidor
completing p
remaining 1
ntimately fa
engineering
Tyler and Lu
Indiana. In a
Texas Tollw
Senior Bridg
Mr. Tejidor p
of all bridge
Loop 45 desi
SH 121 Desi
Dallas, Texa
Mr. Tejidor
overpasses/u
LBJ Freewa
Mr. Tejidor
project in Da
for in-field c
DFW Conne
Mr. Tejidor
build propos
bridge struct
bridge geom
bridge design
field changes
TEJIDO
dge Projec
Science in C
f Texas at A
Engineer, S
r is a Senior
n the planni
complicate
and foundat
of computer
gn (Pstr 14)
Design/Ana
me Analysis
worked m
projects thro
0 years as
familiar with
on bridge d
ubbock Dist
ddition to En
way Authori
ge Engineer
provided con
e girders and
ign-build tol
ign-Build Pr
as, Senior B
was respon
underpasses a
ay Design-B
was respons
allas, Texas.
onstruction
ector Design
served as th
sal as well a
tures (1-45 a
metry progra
ns included i
s, out-of-tole
OR, P.E.
ct Manager
Civil Enginee
Austin
State of TX, #
r Bridge Pro
ng and desig
ed designs.
tion design,
design prog
), PGSuper,
alysis (Merl
(Frame 11, S
more than 1
oughout Texa
the TxDOT
h TxDOT's
design proje
tricts, and h
nglish, Mr. T
ity (TTA), L
r
nstruction su
d design of r
ll road projec
roject: Betw
Bridge Engin
nsible for th
and intercha
Build Projec
sible for the
Additionally
issues.
n-Build Pro
he Senior Bri
as for the de
and 1-47, and
am BGS (tra
in the projec
erance const
r / Designe
ering (Struct
#63797 (198
oject Manag
gn of bridge
His technic
retaining wa
grams that in
Bent Cap A
lin-Dash, MD
Strudl).
3 years wit
as. The first
T Austin Di
procedures
ects for TxD
as designed
Tejidor is flu
Loop 45 Des
upport and w
remedial sol
ct in Austin,
ween Dallas
neer
he bridge p
anges to quan
t, Dallas, Te
e design of o
y, he assiste
oject, Tende
idge Engine
sign and dev
d 1-45 Revi
aining and e
ct, and provi
truction issue
r
tural) (1982)
88)
ger and Lead
e structures.
cal experien
alls, and rela
nclude Road
Analysis (CA
DX), Colum
th the Texa
three years
strict Bridg
s and prefer
DOT’s Hous
bridges for
uent in Span
sign-Build P
was responsi
lutions to ou
, Texas.
North Toll
portion of th
ntify the win
exas, Senior
one of the lo
d in reviewi
er, Dallas/Fo
er in the pre
velopment o
sed). Additio
execution),
ded on-call c
es).
)
d Structural
He supervis
nce includes
ated structure
dway Design
AP 18), Co
mn Design/A
as Departm
were spent
ge Engineer.
rences. He
ston, Waco,
r the DOT’s
nish.
Project, Aus
ible for verif
ut-of-toleran
lway (DNT)
he proposal
nning BOQ.
r Bridge En
ongest bridg
ing and prov
ort Worth, T
eliminary pla
of plans, spe
onally, he as
as Quality C
construction
l Engineer w
ses bridge d
s bridge lay
es. Mr. Tejid
n System (RD
ontinuous Be
Analysis (PIE
ment of Tran
with the Bri
This exper
has also w
Dallas, Pha
of Florida,
stin, Texas,
fying and co
nce construc
) and US 75
l, and prelim
ngineer
ge structures
viding structu
Texas, Seni
anning and d
ecifications a
ssisted with
Control (QC
n support (sh
with over 32
design projec
youts, super
dor is profic
DS/BGS), P
eam Analys
ER, PCA2,
nsportation
idge Divisio
rience has m
worked in c
arr, Lufkin,
Idaho, Neb
orrecting bea
ction problem
Tender,
minary desi
s for this de
ural recomm
ior Bridge E
design for th
and estimate
the preferre
C) reviewer
hop plan revi
2 years of
cts, taking
rstructure,
ient in the
Prestressed
is (B-30),
BM-COL
(TxDOT)
on, and the
made him
consulting
Amarillo,
braska and
aring seats
ms for the
gn of the
sign-build
mendations
Engineer
he design-
es for two
ed TxDOT
for other
iew, RFIs,

2. J
N
S
M
b
L
M
b
I
M
b
T
M
t
T
c
w
T
M
T
t
c
H
2
M
s
T








José F.
North Tarra
Senior Bridg
Mr. Tejidor s
build propos
LBJ Freewa
Mr. Tejidor s
build propos
I-35 East De
Mr. Tejidor
build propos
TxDOT Aus
Mr. Tejidor
to an interch
The project i
connectors to
width). Desig
TxDOT Hou
Mr. Tejidor
TxDOT Hou
tapering slab
construction
Harris Coun
2B and 2C H
Mr. Tejidor
specification
Texas. The b
 Mason C
 Franz Ro
 Morton R
 Keith Ha
 Beckend
 FM 529 O
 Longenb
 West Roa
Tejidor,
ant Express
ge Engineer
served as the
al for the NT
ay Design-B
served as the
al for the LB
esign-Build
served as S
al for I-35E
stin District
served as Se
hange under
involved fiv
o existing br
gn was comp
uston Distri
served as Br
uston Distric
b, offset ben
cost was $1
nty Toll Roa
Harris Coun
r served as
ns and estima
bridges inclu
Creek Overpa
oad Overpass
Road Overpa
arrow Road O
orf Road Ov
Overpass No
augh Road O
ad Overpass
P.E.
s (NTE) Des
r
e Senior Bri
TE in Dallas
Build Projec
e Senior Bri
BJ Freeway i
Project - Te
Senior Bridg
in Dallas, T
t / TTA, Art
enior Bridge
construction
ve additional
ridges (863’
pleted in 200
ict, I-610 / U
ridge Engine
ct. The proje
nts, abutmen
.2 million.
ad Authorit
nty, Texas, S
s Senior B
ates for 16 b
uded:
ass Northbou
s Northboun
ass Northbou
Overpass No
verpass Nort
orthbound an
Overpass No
s Northbound
sign-Build P
idge Enginee
s, Texas.
t, Dallas, Te
idge Enginee
in Dallas, Te
ender Dalla
ge Engineer
Texas.
terial C, Au
e Engineer re
n on the Art
l bridges, tw
EB and 12
06.
US 59 Multi-
eer for the d
ect encompas
nts, and deep
ty (HCTRA
Senior Brid
Bridge Engi
bridges for th
und and Sou
nd and South
und and Sou
orthbound an
thbound and
nd Southbou
orthbound an
d and Southb
Project – Te
er for the pre
exas, Senior
er for the pre
exas.
as, Texas, Se
for the prel
ustin, Texas,
esponsible f
terial C proj
wo frontage r
46’ WB), an
-Level Conn
design of the
ssed designi
p drilled sha
), Grand Pa
dge Enginee
ineer respon
he Grand Pa
uthbound
hbound
uthbound
nd Southbou
Southbound
und (plate gir
nd Southbou
bound (curv
ender, Dalla
eliminary pl
r Bridge En
eliminary pl
enior Bridg
liminary plan
, Senior Bri
for all design
ect for the T
road bridges
nd one overp
nector, Hou
e widening o
ing plate gir
aft foundatio
arkway (SH
er
nsible for
arkway (SH
und
d
rder superstr
und
ved steel plat
as, Texas,
lanning and
ngineer
lanning and
ge Engineer
anning and d
idge Engine
n work relat
TxDOT Aus
s (1392’ EB
pass (260’ l
uston, Texas
of a multi-le
rders and pre
ons in very
H 99), Segme
the design
99) Segmen
ructure)
te girder sup
design for th
design for th
design for th
eer
ted to a Chan
stin District
and 1557’
ength by 14
s, Bridge En
evel connect
estressed gir
weak soil.
ent E, Sectio
, plan dev
nt E in Harri
erstructure)
he design-
he design-
he design-
nge Order
and TTA.
WB), two
45’ overall
ngineer
tor for the
rders for a
Estimated
on 2A,
velopment,
is County,

3. J
T
B
M
e
i
i
w
T
M
n
d
g
d
N
&
M
t
w
P
c
T
M
T
g
t
w
T
M
e
g
s
w
a
T
M
a
w
t
m
a
José F.
TxDOT Hou
Bridge Engi
Mr. Tejidor
engineers wo
nvolved the
nverted-T b
was $1.5 mil
TxDOT Aus
Mr. Tejidor s
new bridge o
design of ho
girders to sp
drilled shafts
North Texas
& Southbou
Mr. Tejidor
the NTTA P
widths. The
PGL being
completed in
TxDOT Aus
Mr. Tejidor
TxDOT Aus
geometric la
transition, ho
was $750,00
TxDOT Aus
Mr. Tejidor
east frontage
girders, allow
substructure
water off the
and web wal
TxDOT Aus
Mr. Tejidor
and I beam u
worn out dec
the structura
modifying th
analyzed the
Tejidor,
uston Distri
ineer
served as B
orking on th
design of th
ents, steel b
llion.
stin District
served as Se
over Inks La
orizontally cu
pan the mai
s, and founda
s Tollway A
und Main L
served as Se
PGBT toll fa
bridges inco
referenced t
n 2007.
stin District
served as S
stin District
ayout. The p
orizontal and
0.
stin District
served as Se
e road for the
wing the ski
and founda
e bridge and
lls and found
stin District
served as Se
unit reconstr
ck and old H
al adequacy
he bents so
existing dec
P.E.
ict, I-610 / U
Bridge Engin
he Authorize
he prestresse
box straddle
t, SH 29 Ink
enior Bridge
ake for the T
urved appro
n river chan
ation design
Authority (N
anes Over M
enior Bridge
acility. The b
orporated aes
to a vertica
t, RM 165 O
enior Bridge
t. The proje
proposed br
d vertical cur
t, IH 35 Fro
enior Bridge
e TxDOT Au
pping of eve
ation costs. T
into a hazar
dation design
t, IH 35 Ove
enior Bridge
ruction for th
HS-15 I-beam
of the inter
prestressed
ck and beam
US 59 Autho
neer respon
d Vehicle L
ed girders an
bent, abutm
ks Lake Brid
Engineer re
TxDOT Aus
oach spans u
nnel, aesthe
n. Estimated
NTTA) / Pre
Miller Road
e Engineer r
bridges were
sthetic colum
al and horiz
Over Blanco
e Engineer r
ect consiste
ridge alignm
rves, and req
ntage Road
e Engineer r
ustin Distric
ery other be
The project
rdous materi
n. Estimated
er Blanco R
e Engineer in
he TxDOT A
m units with
rior and abu
girders cou
ms to assure t
orized Vehic
sible for the
Lane Bridge
nd plate girde
ments, and fo
dge, Texas,
esponsible fo
stin District
using prestre
tic hollow c
construction
esident Geor
d Dallas, Tex
esponsible f
e three-span
mns and ben
zontal curve
o River, Blan
responsible
ed of design
ment had a
quired web w
d Bridge, Ge
responsible f
ct. The proje
nt on the ad
also require
ial trap, the
d construction
River, San M
n charge of
Austin Distri
h a new dec
utment bents
ld be placed
that a specifi
cle Lane Br
e design, an
for the TxD
ers of the sup
oundation de
Senior Brid
or the design
. The projec
essed beams,
columns sup
n cost was $6
rge Bush Tu
xas, Senior
for the desig
n, type IV be
nts. Complex
baseline b
nco, Texas,
for the desi
ning a conv
severe skew
walls in the
eorgetown,
for the desig
ct consisted
djacent IH 35
ed designing
design of ve
n cost was $
Marcos, Texa
design and p
ict. The proj
ck supported
s for the inc
d on them. D
ic crane coul
ridge, Houst
nd for assig
DOT Houston
perstructure
esign. Estima
dge Enginee
n and develo
ct consisted
, design of w
pported by
6.2 million.
urnpike (PG
Bridge Eng
gn of two rep
eam structur
x geometry w
etween the
Senior Brid
ign and plan
ventional br
w of 55 de
river. Estim
Texas, Seni
gn of a long
of using typ
5 main lane
g a drainage
ery tall bent
$1.5 million.
as, Senior B
plan product
ect consisted
d on prestres
crease in de
During cons
ld operate on
ton, Texas,
gning design
n District. T
in a horizon
ated constru
er
opment of PS
of layout re
weathering s
a floating f
GBT), North
gineer
placement b
res with tap
was augmen
bridges. De
dge Enginee
n developme
ridge for a
egrees, supe
mated constru
ior Bridge E
river crossi
pe VI mod p
bridge, thus
e system to
ts requiring t
Bridge Engin
tion for a br
d of replacin
ssed girders,
sign load (D
struction, M
n the superst
n work, to
he project
ntal curve,
uction cost
S&E for a
efinement,
steel plate
footing on
hbound
bridges for
ering slab
nted by the
esign was
er
ent for the
a complex
erelevation
uction cost
Engineer
ng for the
prestressed
s reducing
carry the
tie beams,
neer
ridge deck
ng a badly
verifying
D.L.), and
Mr. Tejidor
tructure.

4. J
T
S
M
9
f
i
c
h
E
N
M
c
i
T
M
w
c
l
w
T
M
s
o
d
T
S
M
s
c
h
b
T
M
f
s
h
w
d
José F.
TxDOT Aus
Senior Bridg
Mr. Tejidor
971 over Op
for this proje
ncluded ero
case the eros
highly erodi
Estimated co
NTTA, FM
Mr. Tejidor
constructabil
ncorporation
TxDOT Aus
Mr. Tejidor
widening of
consisted of
loading. It a
with tie beam
TxDOT Aus
Mr. Tejidor
structures ov
on a horizon
design in var
TxDOT Aus
Senior Bridg
Mr. Tejidor
separate sect
consisted of
hide it from
beam design
TxDOT Aus
Mr. Tejidor
frontage tur
superstructur
horizontal cu
with web wa
during a seve
Tejidor,
stin District
ge Engineer
served as S
ossum Creek
ect because t
sion abatem
sion abateme
ble location
onstruction c
2818 and R
r served as
lity issues.
n into the pla
stin District
served as S
f a plate gir
f retrofitting
lso included
ms and web w
stin District
served as S
ver Brushy C
ntal curve wi
riable soil co
stin District
ge Engineer
served as S
tions of the
designing u
the front of
in variable
stin District
served as Se
rnout bridge
re that had
urve and extr
alls and fou
ere flood. Es
P.E.
t, FM 971 O
r
Senior Bridg
k in William
the road was
ent measure
ent did not w
n. The proje
cost was $30
Ramp C, Dal
QC Revie
Mr. Tejidor
an set.
t, FM 969 O
enior Bridge
rder bridge
the existing
d deck repla
walls, abutm
t, Parmer L
Senior Bridg
Creek for the
ith a superel
onditions.
t, Parmer L
r
Senior Bridg
Parmer Lan
unreinforced
f the wall to
soil conditio
t, Loop 360
enior Bridge
e for the
variable ske
reme cross s
undation desi
stimated con
Over Opossu
e Engineer r
mson County
s to be close
es around one
work and the
ct turned ou
0,000.
llas, Texas,
ewer respon
r issued cor
Over Colorad
e Engineer r
that has cov
g plate girde
acement, wid
ment widenin
ane (FM 73
ge Engineer
e TxDOT Au
levation tran
ane (FM 73
ge Engineer
ne (FM 734
masonry w
reduce the p
ons.
at RM 2222
e Engineer re
TxDOT Au
ews of mod
slope of .09 f
ign, and a s
nstruction co
um Creek, W
responsible
y for the TxD
d and box b
e abutment,
e bridge had
ut to be bat
QC Review
nsible for th
rrective com
do River, B
responsible
ver plates f
ers with add
dening of th
ng, and found
34) Bridges,
responsible
ustin Distric
nsition, abutm
34) Noise W
responsible
4) highway
walls between
picket fence
2, Austin, T
esponsible fo
ustin Distric
derate (32 d
ft/ft. Also in
slab hold-do
st was $170
Williamson
for the desi
DOT Austin
beams provid
designing th
d to be length
t-friendly an
wer
he review
mments and
Bastrop, Tex
for the desi
for the TxD
ditional cov
he bridge wi
dation desig
Austin, Tex
e for the des
ct. Project in
ment and in
Wall, Austin,
e for the de
for the TxD
n pilasters. E
look. Also
exas, Senior
or the design
ct. The pro
degrees) to s
ncluded was
own system
,000.
County, Te
ign and plan
District. Bo
de quick con
hat abutment
hened, and f
nd now has
of two brid
monitored
xas, Senior B
ign and plan
DOT Austin
ver plates to
th Type IV
gn in the rive
xas, Senior
sign of two
ncluded desig
nterior bent d
Texas,
esign of a n
DOT Austin
Every other
included wa
r Bridge En
n and plan d
oject consi
severe (63 d
abutment an
to prevent t
exas,
n developme
ox beams we
nstruction. T
t as an interi
foundation d
a substantia
dges for de
the details
Bridge Engi
n developme
District. Th
bring it up
beams, inte
er.
Bridge Eng
separate lo
gning a supe
design and f
oise wall al
District. Th
pilaster was
as footing an
ngineer
development
sted of des
degrees), a
nd interior be
the slab from
ent of FM
ere chosen
The project
ior bent in
design in a
al colony.
esign and
to ensure
ineer
ent for the
he project
p to HS20
erior bents
gineer
ong bridge
erstructure
foundation
long three
he project
s offset to
nd support
t of a right
signing a
20-degree
ent design
m floating

5. J
T
S
M
T
d
f
T
M
c
r
r
T
S
M
T
d
t
f
T
S
M
s
1
a
f
r
t
T
m
T
S
M
w
w
e
d
T
M
T
d
r
José F.
TxDOT Aus
Senior Bridg
Mr. Tejidor
TxDOT Aus
designing a
foundation d
TxDOT Aus
Mr. Tejidor s
crane destroy
replace the
reviewing be
TxDOT Aus
Senior Bridg
Mr. Tejidor
TxDOT Aus
designing a n
the ballast to
for research.
TxDOT Aus
Senior Bridg
Mr. Tejidor
specification
1930’s concr
and vehicula
for the pier e
replacement
time Project
The widened
million.
TxDOT Aus
Senior Bridg
Mr. Tejidor
widening of
widening the
extending th
design in ero
TxDOT Aus
Mr. Tejidor
TxDOT Aus
developing m
roadway and
Tejidor,
stin District
ge Engineer
served as S
stin District.
new deck, d
design.
stin District
served as Se
ying one spa
one that ca
ent shoring d
stin District
ge Engineer
served as S
stin District.
new prestres
o keep the ra
stin District
ge Engineer
r served as
ns and estim
rete arch stru
ar traffic at a
extensions, a
with a conv
Manager/C
d structure m
stin District
ge Engineer
served as S
f a continuou
e superstruc
he interior be
odible materi
stin District
served as S
stin District
metric plans
d the other fo
P.E.
t, Dessau Ro
r
Senior Bridg
. The projec
designing ne
t, Corn Hill
enior Bridge
an for the Tx
ame crashing
details, and a
t, Steck Ave
r
Senior Bridg
The project
ssed girder a
ailroad funct
t, SH 29 Ove
r
s Senior B
mates for this
ucture. The
all times dur
abutment ret
ventional sla
onstruction
maintained i
t, SH 29 Ove
r
enior Bridge
us I-beam u
cture with pr
ents for the w
ial. Estimate
t, IH 35: Ro
enior Bridge
t. The proj
s from exist
our were very
oad Over G
ge Engineer
ct encompas
ew floor bea
Underpass
Engineer re
xDOT Austi
g down on
assisting the
enue Under
ge Engineer
t consisted o
and coordina
tioning. The
er the South
Bridge Engi
s bridge wid
project cons
ring construc
taining wall
ab and prestr
Inspector du
its historic a
er San Gab
e Engineer r
unit bridge f
restressed g
widened por
ed cost of con
und Rock t
e Engineer r
ect consiste
ting English
y tall structu
Gilleland Cre
r in charge
ssed devising
ams, designi
at IH 35, Ja
esponsible fo
in District. T
IH 35, des
Contractor t
Mopac Rai
responsible
of removing
ating with th
e damaged b
h Fork of th
ineer respon
dening for th
sisted of lay
ction. It also
design on a
ressed girder
uring which
aesthetic qua
riel River, G
responsible
for the TxDO
irders, rehab
rtion, abutm
nstruction: $
o Georgetow
responsible
ed of widen
h units. Two
ures over riv
eek, Pfluger
of relocatin
g a method
ing new abu
arrell, Texa
or repair to th
The project i
signing the
to reduce de
ilroad, Aust
for the repa
the damage
e railroad co
beam was do
he San Gabr
nsible for
he TxDOT A
out developm
o required th
a sheer cliff,
r system. M
he personal
alities. Estim
Georgetown
for the desi
OT Austin D
bilitating th
ment break-ba
$1.1 million.
wn, Texas,
for the desi
ning six ma
o bridges we
vers.
rville, Texas
ng a historic
d to disassem
utments for t
as, Senior B
his bridge du
involved des
repair of th
elays.
tin, Texas,
air of this ra
ed prestresse
ompany on a
onated to the
riel River, G
the design
Austin Distr
ment, allow
he design of
f, and compl
Mr. Tejidor al
lly post-tens
mated constr
n, Texas,
ign and plan
District. The
e shoes und
ack and wid
.
Senior Brid
ign and plan
ain lane br
ere on a ho
s,
c truss bridg
mble the tru
the new loc
ridge Engin
ue to a truck
signing a ne
he damaged
ailroad bridg
ed concrete g
a method to
e University
Georgetown
, plan dev
rict. The brid
ing pedestri
f post-tension
lete deck rem
lso served a
sioned the p
ruction cost
n developme
e project co
der the I bea
dening and f
dge Enginee
n developme
ridges. This
orizontal cur
ge for the
uss bridge,
ation, and
neer
k-mounted
ew span to
columns,
ge for the
girder and
hold back
y of Texas
n, Texas,
velopment,
dge was a
an access,
ned wings
moval and
as the full-
ier wings.
was $1.1
ent for the
onsisted of
am spans,
foundation
er
ent for the
included
rve over a

6. J
T
M
t
s
s
T
M
b
a
T
M
1
f
o
f
T
L
M
b
t
E
T
T
t
c
T
M
c
d
w
s
d
T
D
e
T
T
l
s
José F.
TxDOT Aus
Mr. Tejidor
the TxDOT
spans on a
supported on
TxDOT Aus
Mr. Tejidor
beam bridge
aesthetic inte
TxDOT Aus
Mr. Tejidor
183 and Purp
friendly ramp
on the bottom
foundation d
TxDOT Am
Lubbock, T
Mr. Tejidor
bridge over I
the abutment
E-80 live loa
TxDOT Hou
This project
the TxDOT H
construction
TxDOT Luf
Mr. Tejidor
consisted of
deemed sens
without getti
spans were c
design were
TxDOT Tyl
Design of a
employed Ty
TxDOT Tyl
Tejidor perfo
lengths, bea
superstructur
Tejidor,
stin District
served as Se
Austin Distr
horizontal
n footings wi
stin District
served as Se
e for the Tx
erior bent wi
stin District
served as Se
ple Sage Dri
ps supported
m flanges o
design.
marillo Distr
exas, Bridg
served as B
I-27 for the T
t, abutment
ading. Estim
uston Distri
consisted of
Houston Dis
phasing, roa
fkin District
served as S
constructing
sitive by the
ing in the w
constructed f
all based on
er District,
bridge repla
ype B beam
er District.
formed all re
am layout,
re design, an
P.E.
t, US 290-Ra
enior Bridge
rict. The pro
curve, inve
ith drilled sh
t, North Lam
enior Bridge
xDOT Austin
ith bridge lig
t, US 183, A
enior Bridge
ive for the T
d on straddle
of Type IV b
rict, I-27 Atl
e Engineer
Bridge Engin
TxDOT Am
design, inte
ated constru
ict, IH 10 R
f four bridge
strict. Mr. Te
adway taper,
t, CR 256 at
Senior Bridg
g the new bri
U.S. Army
water was de
from the top
n the maximu
US 259 at U
acement con
ms to keep m
Finished br
equired desi
bent locati
nd foundation
amp E-2, A
e Engineer r
oject consist
erted-T sing
haft foundati
mar Crossov
e Engineer re
n District. T
ghting suppo
Austin, Texa
e Engineer r
TxDOT Aust
e and cantile
beams, a fen
lanta, Topek
neer respon
marillo Distric
erior bent de
uction cost w
econstructio
es, two twin
ejidor served
, superelevat
t Carrizo Ba
ge Engineer
idge from th
Corp of Eng
evised. The
p of the prev
um crane siz
UPRR, Kilg
nsisting of th
minimum cl
ridge is 83’
gn including
ions and be
n design.
ustin, Texas
responsible f
ted of design
gle-column b
ions.
ver, Austin,
esponsible f
The project
ort, and aesth
s, Senior Br
responsible f
tin District. T
evered bents,
nce enclosur
ka and Sant
sible for the
ct. The proje
esign, supers
was $350,000
on, Houston
n 2500’ U-be
d as Senior B
tion transitio
ayou, Kingt
responsible
he top down
gineers (USA
first span w
vious span. L
ze needed to
gore, Texas,
hree phases t
learance ove
wide with
g coding an
earing seats
s, Senior Br
for the desig
ning conven
bents and a
, Texas, Sen
for the desig
included de
hetic column
ridge Engin
for the desig
The project i
, the design
re on the wa
ta Fe (AT&
e design an
ect consisted
structure des
0.
n, Texas, Se
eam type an
Bridge Engi
on, and horiz
town, Texas
for the des
for the TxD
ACE) so a m
was built fro
Lengths of s
drive piles o
Senior Brid
to accommo
er the railro
sidewalks.
nd running th
s (elevation
ridge Engin
gn of an exit
ntional slab a
an inverted
nior Bridge
gn and plan d
esign of ske
ns and found
neer
gn of a pede
included the
of the walkw
alkway, sing
&SF) Railroa
d plan prep
d of designin
sign, and fou
enior Bridge
d two twin 5
ineer respon
zontal and ve
s, Senior Br
sign of a bri
DOT Lufkin D
method of co
om the appr
span, beam
off the newly
dge Enginee
odate existin
oad tracks a
As Senior B
he framing
ns), abutme
neer
t ramp on U
and prestres
-T straddle
Engineer
developmen
ewed-end bo
dation design
estrian overp
e design of w
way over the
gle column b
ad Spur,
paration for
ng an approa
undation des
e Engineer
570’ U-beam
sible for des
ertical curva
ridge Engine
idge replace
District. The
onstructing t
roach, and su
type and su
y constructe
er
ng traffic. N
after widenin
Bridge Engi
program to
nt and ben
US 290 for
sed girder
bent, all
nt of a box
ox beams,
n.
pass at US
wheelchair
e highway
bents, and
a railroad
ach slab at
sign using
m type for
sign of the
ature.
eer
ement that
e lake was
the bridge
ubsequent
ubstructure
d span.
ew bridge
ng for the
ineer, Mr.
get beam
nt design,

7. J
B
L
M
a
l
b
C
M
b
t
c
a
e
c
b
f
b
n
W
M
t
t
p
T
d
t
a
T
H
M
5
w
t
d
S
M
m
P
M
p
a
José F.
Bardin Road
Lead Struct
Mr. Tejidor s
airport taxiw
loading, buil
backfilled an
Creek Bend
Mr. Tejidor
bridge over W
the bridge. T
curve and ha
abutment. Th
emergency v
could suppor
beams. Mr.
frame the ex
bent/abutmen
new abutmen
William Can
Mr. Tejidor
the existing l
the large flo
prone area. T
The new brid
detour or con
the framing
abutment and
TxDOT Hou
Houston, Te
Mr. Tejidor s
5B40 and 5B
with a 26 de
to carry an a
design of a p
Sims Bayou
Mr. Tejidor
manholes for
Plate Girder
Mr. Tejidor s
plate girder
and monitore
Tejidor,
d Tunnel at
tural Engine
served as the
way tunnel/b
ldings, and a
nd overlaid w
d Bridge Ext
served as S
Williams Cr
This required
ad a sag vert
he design ha
vehicles. On
rt the increas
Tejidor perf
xisting and p
nt substructu
nt.
nnon Road
served as Se
low-water cr
od plain tha
The propose
dge was buil
nstruction ph
program to
d bent design
uston Distri
exas, Senior
served as Se
B34 boxes f
egree skew, a
additional loa
platform to c
Wastewate
served as L
r the Sims B
r Bridges, C
served as QC
bridges desi
ed details to
P.E.
t Arlington
eer
e Lead Struc
bridge. Proj
air-quality n
with the soil
tension On P
enior Bridge
reek to impro
d the lengthe
tical curve. T
ad to be phas
ne design fe
sed loads fro
formed all r
proposed sup
ure, designin
Over Onion
enior Bridge
rossing over
at had forced
d multi-span
lt adjacent to
hasing. Mr.
get beam l
n, superstruc
ict, US 90A
r Bridge Eng
enior Bridge
for the TxDO
and 96’-8” o
ad due to a 6
arry an adva
er Lines Rer
Lead Structur
Bayou Waste
Columbus, O
C Reviewer
igned for th
ensure incor
Municipal A
ctural Engine
ject features
needs. The t
and paveme
Pleasant Va
e Engineer i
ove the hydr
ening of the
The lengthen
sed to accom
ature was c
om the much
required des
perstructure
ng the new
n Creek, Au
e Engineer r
r Onion Cree
d the City to
n bridge wou
o the low-w
Tejidor perf
lengths, beam
cture design,
Burling-No
gineer
Engineer re
OT Houston
overall width
6’x 6’ concr
ance warning
routing Proj
ral Engineer
water Rerou
Ohio, QC R
for this proj
e City of Co
rporation int
Airport, Cit
eer for the de
s included
tunnel was c
ent of the run
alley Road,
in charge of
raulic openin
e existing bri
ning resulted
mmodate exis
onverting th
h longer span
ign includin
to acquire b
abutment, a
ustin, Texas
responsible i
ek on William
o buy homes
uld be much
ater crossing
formed all r
m layout, b
, and founda
orthern San
esponsible fo
n District. Th
h designed u
rete platform
g sign with h
ject, Housto
r for the des
uting Project
Reviewer
ject, which i
olumbus, Oh
to the plan s
ty of Arling
esign of a tw
multi-phase
constructed
nway.
Austin, Tex
f the design
ng and allow
idge by 110
d in an end
sting traffic,
he existing a
ns supported
ng running t
bearing seat
and foundat
s, Senior Bri
in charge of
m Cannon D
s in the area
h higher than
g enabling it
required desi
bent location
ation design.
nta Fe (BNSF
or the design
he overall le
using three p
m at the ends
handrail and
on, Texas, L
sign of nine
t.
involved rev
hio. Mr. Tej
et.
gton, Texas,
wo-span 110
ed airport d
using a brid
xas, Senior B
for the exte
w more flood
0’. The bridg
span being
including u
abutment to
d on Type IV
the framing/
ts (elevation
tion design
idge Engine
f the design
Drive. The ne
a and move
n the existin
t to be const
ign includin
ns and beari
.
F) Railroad
n of this box
ength of this
phases. Two
s. In addition
d control box
Lead Struct
e half-foot-d
viewing and
jidor issued
00’-wide cut
development
dge structure
Bridge Eng
ension of th
d waters to f
ge was in a h
acutely skew
uninterrupted
o an interior
V prestressed
/geometry pr
ns), designing
for the new
eer
for a replac
ew bridge ha
them out of
ng low-water
tructed witho
ng coding an
ing seats (el
d Overpass,
x beam struc
s structure w
o bents were
n, the projec
x.
tural Engine
diameter, 50-
analyzing tw
corrective c
and cover
, airplane
e that was
gineer
he existing
flow under
horizontal
wed at the
d access to
r bent that
d concrete
rogram to
g the new
w bent and
cement for
ad to span
f the flood
r crossing.
out a road
nd running
levations),
ture using
was 1135’,
e designed
t included
eer
-foot-deep
wo curved
comments

8. J
H
T
c
o
a
(
T
T
r
p
b
d
C
T
T
J
T
r
(
I
M
t
c
F
M
o
s
3
M
K
2
c
A
M
m
m
U
M
u
José F.
Harkey Roa
This project
concrete pile
on both side
and running
(elevations),
Tuckerton R
This bridge r
raised curb o
performed al
beam layout
design, and f
Cedar Break
This project
Type VI Mo
J beam at the
T girders. A
running the
(elevations),
I-95 Braided
Mr. Tejidor
thoroughfare
curved girde
Florida Tur
Mr. Tejidor
over Bird R
superstructur
30th Avenue
Mr. Tejidor
Kearny, Neb
210-meter st
cast, prestres
Avenue M/N
Mr. Tejidor s
meters total
materials we
US 95 Over
Mr. Tejidor
utilizing LRF
Tejidor,
ad and McL
consisted o
e foundations
es. As Senio
the framing
abutment an
Road Bridge
replacement
on other sid
ll required d
t, bent locat
foundation d
ks Bridge, W
involved a 1
od to accom
e request of
As Senior Br
framing pr
abutment an
d Connector
served as
e bridge in M
rs, interior b
rnpike, Miam
served as th
Road, Kenda
re widening,
e Project, K
served as t
braska utilizi
tructure (lon
ssed bulb-T g
N, Kearny, N
served as Br
length, whic
ere pre-cast, p
Bellgrove C
served as
FD design. A
P.E.
Lean Road B
of three span
s, abutments
or Bridge En
g program t
nd bent desig
es, Harris C
t project con
de, and 18”
design inclu
tions and be
design.
Williamson
1350.25’-lon
mmodate a 3
the Contract
idge Engine
rogram to g
nd bent desig
r, Miami, F
the Bridge
Miami, Flor
bent widenin
mi, Florida,
he Bridge En
ll and Mille
, widening o
Kearny, Neb
the Bridge E
ing Load an
ngest span w
girders.
Nebraska, B
ridge Engine
ch were desi
prestressed b
Creek, Bellg
Bridge Eng
Also include
Bridges, Pea
n slab beam
s designed as
ngineer, Mr.
to get beam
gn, superstru
County, Tex
nsisted of thr
concrete pil
ding coding
earing seats
County, Te
ng structure,
0” water lin
tor and addit
eer, Mr. Teji
get beam le
gn, superstru
Florida, Brid
Engineer re
rida. The pro
ng, and abutm
, Bridge En
ngineer respo
er Road in
of the inverte
braska, Brid
Engineer res
nd Resistance
was 44 meter
Bridge Engi
eer for this p
igned utilizin
bulb-T girde
grove, Idaho
gineer for th
d was LRFD
arland, Texa
bridges wit
s interior ben
Tejidor per
lengths, be
ucture design
xas, Senior B
ree-span Sla
le foundatio
g and runnin
(elevations
exas, Senior
which was o
ne. The Typ
tional design
idor perform
engths, beam
ucture design
dge Enginee
esponsible f
oject involv
ment widenin
gineer
onsible for v
Miami, Flor
ed-T caps, an
dge Enginee
sponsible fo
e Factor De
rs). The brid
ineer
project, whic
ng LRFD. T
ers.
o, Bridge En
his project,
D design of t
as, Senior B
th 18 and 1
nts for futur
rformed all
eam layout,
n, and found
Bridge Engi
ab Beam Bri
ons. As Seni
ng the frami
s), abutment
r Bridge Eng
originally de
pe VI Mod
n funded by
med all requ
m layout, b
n, and found
er
for the desi
ved widening
ng.
verifying an
rida. The pr
nd the abutm
er
or the design
sign (LRFD
dges were ne
ch included 1
The longest s
ngineer
which invo
the bridge de
Bridge Engin
5 degree sk
re bridge ext
required des
bent locatio
dation design
ineer
idges, a side
ior Bridge E
ng program
t and bent d
gineer
esigned with
was replace
the Contrac
uired design
bent location
dation design
ign of the w
g the supers
nd designing
roject consi
ment widenin
n of the 30
D). The proje
ew construct
10 spans of n
span was 44
olved twin
eck overhang
neer
kew, respecti
tension, and
sign includin
ons and bea
n.
ewalk on one
Engineer, M
m to get beam
design, supe
h Type IV be
ed after letti
ctor. J beams
including co
ns and bear
n.
widening of
structure wit
the bridge w
sted of desi
ng.
0th Avenue
ect involved
tion and incl
new constru
4 meters. Co
17.924-mete
g.
ively, 18”
sidewalks
ng coding
aring seats
e side and
Mr. Tejidor
m lengths,
erstructure
eams, then
ng with a
s are bulb-
oding and
ring seats
f a major
th parallel
widenings
igning the
Bridge in
d a 5-span,
luded pre-
uction, 420
nstruction
er bridges