2. SECESSION AND SOVEREIGNTY
It seems essential to the modern conception of a State that its government should
exercise supreme dominion over a particular portion of the earth’s surface ... Indeed,
in modern political thought the connection between a political society and its territory
is so close that the two notions almost blend (Sidgwick, 1897, pp. 221222).
National sovereignty does not necessarily entail full control over territory
and resources.
Sovereignty is divided and powers on territory and people may occur
disjunctively
4. THE LIMITS OF THE LITERATURE
Functionalist arguments: a group has exclusive jurisdiction because such power
is functional to the establishment and correct
functioning of minimally just institutions
Competing demands of territorial jurisdiction: one must deny that there is a right to
secede from minimally just states.
Attachment arguments: territorial jurisdiction protects some fundamental interest
of the group or its members, such as the interest in self
government, collective selfdetermination, or happiness
The contraints of secession: unjustified advantage of some groups, or the
implausible right to individual secession.