Overall infrastructure, energy and quality of life in Finland. International comparison of the Finnish business environment. Invest in Finland's marketing materials.

1. International Comparison

2. Infrasturucture
2

3. Quality of overall infrastructure
How would you assess general infrastructure (e.g., transport, telephony, and energy) in the country? (1 =
extremely underdeveloped; 7 = extensive and efficient by international standards), 2010-2011, weighted
average
Source: The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012, World Economic Forum (WEF)
http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GCR_Report_2011-12.pdf
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
China
The USA
Germany
Sweden
Finland

4. Energy infrastructure
Energy infrastructure is adequate and efficient (1=worst; 10=best), 2012
Source: IMD World Competitiveness Yearbook, 2012
http://www.imd.org/research/publications/wcy/World-Competitiveness-Yearbook-Results/#
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
China
The USA
Germany
Sweden
Finland

5. Enterprises having access to the Internet
Source: Eurostat 2012
http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/cache/ITY_OFFPUB/KS-SF-11-065/EN/KS-SF-11-065-EN.PDFEnterprise size: 10 employed persons or more
Percentage of enterprises having access to the internet, 2011
91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100
EU27
Germany
Sweden
Finland

6. Quality of life
Quality of life is high (1=worst; 10=best), 2012
Source: IMD World Competitiveness Yearbook, 2012
http://www.imd.org/research/publications/wcy/World-Competitiveness-Yearbook-Results/#
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
China
The USA
Germany
Sweden
Finland