Powerpoint for DoN Presentation

942 views

Published on

Published in: Technology
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
942
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
5
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
7
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Powerpoint for DoN Presentation

  1. 1. Developing an Emerging Technologies Implementation Plan for DoN NGEN<br />Angela TaylorMay 15, 2010Web 3.0 and Emerging TrendsLIBR 287-01 – Spring 2010School of Library and Information Science – San Jose State University<br />1<br />
  2. 2. Content:<br />Background<br />Project Goals and Objectives<br /> End-Users<br /> Need Assessment<br /> Outcomes<br /> Evaluation<br /> Timetable<br /> Personnel Requirements<br /> Project Promotion<br /> Budget<br /> Resources<br />2<br />
  3. 3. 3<br />Hewlett Packard on NMCI<br />Prior to NMCI, the Department of the Navy IT infrastructure consisted of stove-piped networks independently procured and operated by individual commands throughout the country. Organizing and administering the network this way inhibited connectivity, increased costs, and rendered all information sharing and security all but impossible” (“Navy Marine Corps Intranet (NMCI): About NMCI”, 2010). <br />
  4. 4. 4<br />demoralizing<br />Navy Marine Corps Intranet<br />blocks<br />Marine Corps<br />Fail<br />NMCI<br />Navy<br />8.8 BILLION dollars<br />Non-collaborative<br />
  5. 5. 5<br />
  6. 6. 6<br />The Next Generation of Intranet<br />Navy Chief Information Officer: Robert J. Carey<br />The department embraces the use of Web 2.0 collaboration and working from anywhere we can connect to the network. Web 2.0 does not use new technologies; it is primarily different applications of current technology. Web 2.0 tools present many opportunities for collaboration and information sharing that support becoming a transparent organization, and they are becoming vital to keeping pace in today's environment. So yes, the NGEN infrastructure will support it, just like the NMCI infrastructure today supports it.<br /> <br />My hope is that commands will come onboard and fully exploit the use of Web 2.0 commensurate with necessary security requirements. I mention security because the implementation of any new tools in the DoD requires a cautious risk management approach for ethical use and to protect the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the data. (“Top 10 Questions about NGEN with Answers from the DON CIO Rob Carey”, 2009). <br />
  7. 7. 7<br />Goals and Objectives<br />
  8. 8. 8<br />Who Will Benefit?<br />Department of the Navy<br /> Military Personnel<br /> Military Personnel families<br /> Tax-payers<br />
  9. 9. 9<br />What are the needs of the emerging technologies network integration project?<br />Process:<br />Literature Review<br /> Interviews<br />* GS Employee Users<br />* Active Duty military users<br />Determinants:<br /><ul><li>Decrease fiscal costs
  10. 10. Decrease time costs
  11. 11. Boost morale of DoNpersonnel</li></ul> Increase technical acumen of DoN personnel<br />
  12. 12. 10<br />Three Main Outcomes of Network Integration of Emerging Technologies<br />all written policies and procedures will be worked on through collaborative technologies, be they wikis or Sharepoint-like software available through an organizational intranet.<br />all DoN personnel will participate in bi-annual training sessions on protecting OPSEC when using social networking. <br />the DoN will shift a to-be-determined percentage of training from live-action to virtual in order to save costs.<br />
  13. 13. 11<br />Evaluating Outcomes<br />Surveys<br />Time-cost analysis<br />Fiscal analysis<br /> <br />
  14. 14. 12<br />Timeline: Through Fiscal Year 2010<br />Priority for the implantation time table is to training personnel in effective and safe use of emerging technologies. This means that before NGEN goes live, DoN must create training modules – both synchronous and asynchronous to allow for personnel located in every world time zone to participate – before the start of Fiscal Year (FY) 2011, on October 1, 2010. <br />
  15. 15. 13<br />Timeline: Fiscal Year 2011<br />Collaborative writing requirements will be implemented on an experimental basis starting Annual year 2011, or January 1, 2011. Action research will be conducted during this time as to satisfaction and time-costs when utilizing emerging technologies for collaborative writing.<br />All personnel will be required to conduct collaborative writing projects in emerging technologies the start of FY 2012, or October 1, 2012. Finally, test platforms will continue research into the unclassified use of virtual worlds until the end of FY 2011. <br />
  16. 16. 14<br />Timeline: Fiscal Year 2012<br />A formal evaluation as to effectiveness and OPSEC of virtual worlds in R&D and mission training will be done in FY 2012. <br />
  17. 17. 15<br />Timeline: Fiscal Year 2013<br />Full implementation of virtual worlds for R&D and mission training is projected for implementation across all classification levels in FY 2013.<br />
  18. 18. 16<br />Personnel Requirements<br />Existing active duty and GS personnel will be reorganized as follows:<br /><ul><li>Team of 40 for research, writing, graphic design, editing, and IT support of the training module about social networks and OPSEC.
  19. 19. Staff of 100 to evaluate the collaborative writing experiment and subsequent implementation
  20. 20. Staff of 15 will be needed to contact commands and coordinate participation in the experimental phase of this project
  21. 21. DoNwill contract out work for action research to create survey studies, time-cost structuring, and overall experimental analysis</li></ul> Staff requirements for the virtual worlds R&D and mission training proposal is as yet undetermined. The DoN will continue allowing test groups to conduct command research at an unclassified level until the end of FY 2011. True personnel requirements will be determined during the formal evaluation FY 2012<br />
  22. 22. 17<br />Marketing and Promotion<br />Memorandums<br />
  23. 23. 18<br />Budget<br />Outlay:<br /><ul><li>Personnel already on staff payroll… NO additional personnel costs
  24. 24. 4.2 million dollars: social networking Sweeper to protect OPSEC</li></ul>28 million (roughly 2 million in output for of the Navy and Marine Corps R&D commands participating in the experimental phase) for R&D<br /> 15 million for contracted Public Relations work<br />Savings:<br /> 1 billion saved on personnel training, travel, and R&D. <br />
  25. 25. 19<br />References<br />Carreno, J., Galdorisi, G., Hszieh, S., Siordia, A. (2009). Adopting emerging technologies to enhance organization performance. 14th ICCRTS: C2 and Agility. Retrieved March 18, 2010 from http://www.dtic.mil/cgibin/GetTRDoc?AD=ADA502991&Location=<br /> U2&doc=GetTRDoc.pdf.<br />Carreno, J., Galdorisi, G., Siordia, A. (2008). Levereging emerging technoloiges to maintain corporate situation awareness.13th ICCRTS. Retrieved March 18, 2010 from http://www.dtic.mil/cgi-bin/GetTRDoc?AD=ADA486733&Location<br />=U2&doc=GetTRDoc.pdf<br />Graham, I. (2010). Social media policy balances web 2.0 with security. Retrieved March <br /> 20, 2010 from http://www.defense.gov/news/newsarticle.aspx?id=58135.<br />Gibson, A., Courtney, N., Ward, A.S., Wilcox, D., Holtman, C. (2009). Social by Social: <br /> A Practical Guide to Using New Technologies to Deliver Social Impact. Retrieved March 18, 2010 from http://www.socialbysocial.com/book/social-by-social.<br />Government Accountability Office. (1998, June). Defense computers: Year 2000 computer <br /> problems put Navy operations at risk. (Publication No. GAO/AIMD 98-150). Retrieved March 20, 2010 from http://www.gao.gov/archive/1998/ai98150.pdf.<br />King, D. (2008). Designing the Digital Experience: How to Use Experience Design Tools and Techniques to Build Websites Customers Love. Medford, New Jersey: Information Today, Inc.<br />Lawlor, M.. (2009, August). Advancing on the Virtual Frontier. Signal, 63(12), 57-60.<br />
  26. 26. 20<br />References Continued<br />Navy Marine Corps Intranet (NMCI): About NMCI. (2010). Retrieved March 18, 2010 http://h10134.www1.hp.com/sites/nmci/about/.<br />Office of the Deputy Secretary of Defense. (2010 February 25). DTM 09-026 – Responsible and Effective Sue of Internet-Based Capabilities [Memorandum]. Retrieved March 18, 2010 from http://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/corres/pdf/DTM-09-026.pdf.<br />Overview of Navy Units. (1999). Retrieved March 18, 2010 from http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/navy/unit/overview.htm.<br />Tapscott, D., & Williams, A.D. (2006). Wikinomics: How Mass Collaboration Changes Everything. Mountain View, CA: Portfolio Hardcover. <br />Top 10 Questions about NGEN with Answers from the DON CIO Rob Carey. (2009). Retrieved March 20, 2010 from http://www.chips.navy.mil/<br /> Archives/09_Jan/web_pages/ Rob_Carey.html<br />Werner, A. (2008). The Potential Transformative Impact of Web 2.0 Technology on the Intelligence Community. (Master’s Thesis). Retireved March 18, 2010 from http://www.dtic.mil/cgi-bin/GetTRDoc?AD=<br />ADA494141&Location=U2&doc=GetTRDoc.pdf.<br /> <br />

×