2. Learning outcomes
Know the brief history behind
VISION 2020: the right to
sight
Understand the concept and
priorities of VISION 2020
Assess the actions taken to
date and their impact
4. Main causes of blindness 1995
Cataract and refractive
errors: 25 million
Trachoma, onchocerciasis,
vit. A deficiency: 10 million
Glaucoma, diabetic
retinopathy: 5 million >75%
Other: 5 million
5. Aim of programme for preventing
avoidable blindness
80
60
40
20
Millionsblind
Without VISION 2020
With VISION 2020
20202000 2010
100 million
12. VISION 2020 model for district level
Control strategies
Infrastructure
&
technology
Eye care team
1 million people
13. Global blindness data in 2010
80
60
40
20
Millionsblind
Without VISION 2020
With VISION 2020
20202000 2010
39 million blind
14. What has happened to global
blindness since VISION 2020 began?
45 million blind
2002/2004
39 million blind
2010
15. Impact of cataract surgery
on poverty
30
20
10
0
Dollarsperday
Before surgery 1 year after surgery
Control
Operated
16. Impact of cataract surgery on
quality of life
Control
Operated
100
80
60
40
20
0
Qualityoflifescore
Before surgery 1 year after surgery
17. Summary
We have effective models
for service delivery in some
locations
Challenge now is scale up
Next, plan for ‘harder’ countries
and for chronic diseases
In this presentation we are going to look at how programmes have been implemented in order to address the growing burden of visual impairment. By the end of the presentation you should be able to:
Know the brief history behind VISION 2020: the right to sight
Understand the concept, and priorities, of VISION 2020
Assess the actions taken to date and their impact
In the mid 1990s it was projected that the magnitude of global blindness would increase from 38 million in 1990 to 76 million by 2020. This projection was based on existing service levels and on anticipated population growth and ageing across the world. It highlighted that immediate action was required. Data in 2002 estimated the global blindness had increased to 45 million with 269 million with low vision.
In 1995, the main causes of blindness were found to be cataract and refractive error, which occur across all populations and for which there are clear methods of treatment.
The other important causes of blindness were trachoma, onchocerciasis and vitamin A deficiency in children. These conditions are focal, occurring only in certain groups within populations, and they require a targeted approach. There is no treatment for end stage blindness from these conditions, and so interventions are focused on prevention:
Ivermectin distribution in endemic zones for onchocerciasis
Azythromycin distribution for trachoma
Vitamin A supplementation and immmunisation for measles for childhood blindness.
Glaucoma, diabetic retinopathy and other causes such as age-related macular degeneration (ARMD) were felt to be difficult diseases to identify and manage.
It was therefore decided that the focus should be on the main causes of blindness where strengthening prevention efforts would address over 75% of avoidable blindness.
The aim of implementing a programme for preventing avoidable blindness was to change the trend and bring about a decline in global blindness.
Efforts would be focussed on strengthening services for cataract and refractive error…
Jenny Matthews/Sightsavers CC BY-NC 2.0 flic.kr/p/9oPfvP
…and on prevention activities for trachoma, onchocerciasis, vitamin A deficiency and childhood blindness. This would mean, over a 20 year period, 100 million people would be treated or prevented from going blind.
Image: Anthony Solomon CC BY-NC 2.0 flic.kr/p/9wV6Hw
This idea led to the launch in 1999, of a global initiative to eliminate avoidable blindness – known as VISION 2020: the right to sight. To co-ordinate the initiative, a unique partnership was set up between the World Health Organization and the International Agency for Prevention of Blindness, IAPB. The IAPB is a global consortium of non-governmental organisations working in eye care.
This partnership has worked towards setting goals and targets which countries can use to address blindness at a local level.
The three essential elements for VISION 2020 were:
1. To develop appropriate control strategies and targets for service delivery for: cataract, trachoma, onchocerciasis and childhood blindness
Image: Ferdinand Ama CC BY-NC 2.0 flic.kr/p/9FY2wv
2. To develop human resources
Image: AusAID CC BY 2.0 flic.kr/p/hgbv47
3. To develop infrastructure and appropriate technology
Image: Heiko Philippin CC BY 2.0 flic.kr/p/hDfexQ
The suggested model for development was based on a population of 1 million people. It was expected that if these three essential elements (the eye team, working with good infrastructure and equipment and a disease focused action) were put together and managed well, the result would be the elimination of avoidable blindness.
National prevention of blindness programmes were developed and acted upon locally.
What has happened to global blindness since VISION 2020 began? Recent data from 2010 shows a downward trend. The most important observation is that despite the growth in the global population, the number of blind people is decreasing. Evidence indicates that surgical rates are going up and that prevention is being strengthened.
When we compare data from 2002/2004 with data from 2010 we can see there has been a global decrease in the number of blind people, from 45 to 39 million, and a reduction in the prevalence of visual impairment, from 5% to 4.2%.
Encouragingly, this has been achieved despite a world population increase of half a billion to 6.7 billion, and a rise of 18% in the number of people aged over 50.
The impact of sight restoration on poverty is felt both by individuals and their communities. A study of patient groups showed that one year after cataract surgery, people whose sight had been restored had become economically active and were able to bring in contributions almost at the same level as other similar members within their community.
The impact of restoring sight to the blind can be measured using a quality of life score. The patient group study found that the quality of life score of blind people was a quarter that of the seeing persons in the same community. One year after cataract surgery their quality of life score was equal to others in the community.