1. Journal of Health Organization and Management
Improving hospital care: are learning organizations the answer?
Sophie Soklaridis
Article information:
To cite this document:
Sophie Soklaridis , (2014),"Improving hospital care: are learning organizations the answer?", Journal of
Health Organization and Management, Vol. 28 Iss 6 pp. 830 - 838
Permanent link to this document:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JHOM-10-2013-0229
Downloaded on: 10 November 2016, At: 19:32 (PT)
References: this document contains references to 52 other documents.
To copy this document: permissions@emeraldinsight.com
The fulltext of this document has been downloaded 596 times since 2014*
Users who downloaded this article also downloaded:
(2014),"Context and the leadership experiences and perceptions of professionals: A review of the
nursing profession", Journal of Health Organization and Management, Vol. 28 Iss 6 pp. 811-829 http://
dx.doi.org/10.1108/JHOM-07-2012-0129
(2011),"Demystifying and Improving Organizational Culture in Health Care", Advances in Health Care
Management, Vol. 10 pp. 3-23 http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/S1474-8231(2011)0000010007
Access to this document was granted through an Emerald subscription provided by emerald-srm:273599 []
For Authors
If you would like to write for this, or any other Emerald publication, then please use our Emerald for
Authors service information about how to choose which publication to write for and submission guidelines
are available for all. Please visit www.emeraldinsight.com/authors for more information.
About Emerald www.emeraldinsight.com
Emerald is a global publisher linking research and practice to the benefit of society. The company
manages a portfolio of more than 290 journals and over 2,350 books and book series volumes, as well as
providing an extensive range of online products and additional customer resources and services.
Emerald is both COUNTER 4 and TRANSFER compliant. The organization is a partner of the Committee
on Publication Ethics (COPE) and also works with Portico and the LOCKSS initiative for digital archive
preservation.
*Related content and download information correct at time of download.
DownloadedbyUniversitasGadjahMadaAt19:3210November2016(PT)
3. business of healthcare. Hospitals are knowledge-intensive organizations in that there is
a need for constant updating of the best available evidence and the latest medical
techniques. These innovations have lead to a significant increase in the cost of
providing care. For hospitals to succeed in being innovative in patient care for both
procedures and treatments and remain cognizant of the need for cost containment
efforts, they will have to be run more like businesses than community services
(McDonald and Srinivasan, 2004; Kim et al., 2006).
From a medical educational learning perspective, an example of a cost-effective
strategy is to ensure that innovation and scholarship in hospitals is informed by a
sound review of literature and/or based on a theoretical framework. Scholarship and
innovations that lacks these elements are an impediment to knowledge creation (Albert,
2004) and diminish the overall quality and efficacy of patient care. It is widely
acknowledged that learning may become the only sustainable competitive advantage
for all organizations (Vassalou, 2001), including hospitals. Hospitals have been
anecdotally described as learning organizations. However, to date, no review of the
literature of any kind has been performed on hospitals as learning organizations.
If business organizations have demonstrated that implementing learning organization
concepts has kept them ahead of change, then hospitals can benefit from a similar process.
This paper considers whether the concept of the learning organization can be used
to improve hospital care. It provides a brief overview of the literature on learning
organizations and provides case study examples to illustrate how this concept has been
adapted into practice in two different hospital settings.
The concept of a learning organization
Although some have argued that the learning organization is not a new concept and to
describe it as such does not appropriately recognized the learning that occurred in
organizations in the 1800-1950s (Gronhaug and Stone, 2012), the learning organization,
as a phenomenon, was popularized by Senge (1990, 1991, 1996).
The concept of the learning organization (Garrat, 1987) became a focus of research in
the 1990s when Sengeâs work described a new type of organization that intentionally
develops strategies to promote learning. This concept was presumed to become
important to organizations due to an increase in competition, advances in technology
and shifts towards customer preferences (Garvin, 2008). To stay competitive in this
environment, it was believed that employees needed to become more skilled at creating,
acquiring and transferring knowledge. According to Senge (1990) a company that
becomes a learning organization has a greater ability to adapt to the unpredictable,
which gives that company a competitive advantage over their competitors.
A learning organization promotes learning through two interacting forces:
individual learning and a contextual environment of learning (Hodgkinson, 2000).
For example, when individuals increase their capacity to learn, they can collectively
enhance the overall capacity of the organization to learn, as long as the organization
has a culture and climate that is receptive to their efforts and puts in place appropriate
mechanisms to enable, support and reward the use of what is learned (Marsick and
Watkins, 2003).
Although learning organizations may have different characteristics depending on
the contextual setting, there are common threads that are shared by all learning
organizations and that demonstrate their potential to enable innovations in hospitals.
A learning organization has a strong focus on individuals; concern for all stakeholders;
learning as one of its core values; an openness to experimentation and an attitude of
831
Improving
hospital care
DownloadedbyUniversitasGadjahMadaAt19:3210November2016(PT)
4. responsible risk taking; a readiness to recognize, accept and learn from errors; open
communication; knowledge sharing; and a willingness to unlearn and relearn (Ahmed
et al., 1999; Hill, 2006; Rebelo and Gomes, 2008; Senge, 2006). In addition, there is an
increased awareness among scholars who study learning organizations that most
learning on the job happens informally, in groups or through conversations (Marsick,
2006; Yedema et al., 2007). Learning organizations can range from corporations to higher
education institutes, hospitals or even a family unit (Dowd, 2000). Identification as a
learning organization is seen as a desirable status symbol (Tosey and Mathison, 2008).
The recent business management literature provides examples of how the concept
of the learning organization has been applied successfully in various organizations to
removing restraints to learning, aligning structure and culture for group learning, and
harnessing staff commitment and motivation for personal and service improvement
(Garvin, 2008; Gronhaug and Stone, 2012; Mishra and Bhaskar, 2011; Margherita and
Secundo, 2011; Samli, 2011).
The hospital as a learning organization
A scan of the literature reveals that the concept of the learning organization has been
applied to hospitals and other health care institutions (Bell et al., 2013; Birleson, 1998,
1999; Rowley, 2006). However, it is not known to what extent this concept has been
linked to hospitals and with what outcomes. Consolidating, mapping and synthesizing
the literature on hospitals as learning organizations could be used to develop a
preliminary conceptual framework. This exercise would assist in extracting common
themes from the findings into three key areas of particular importance to hospitals:
implementation of best practices, improving interprofessional care and continuous
quality improvement that could serve as potential benchmark indicators for measuring
continuous quality improvement.
Various theoretical perspectives on learning organizations exist and are
communicated separately in journals that only a portion of the population
(depending on sector) reads. For example, there is a literature on hospital learning
organizations in business management journals that health care providers might not
access, since the topic is only indirectly related to their field of education, research and/
or practice. Intentional linkages among the âsiloedâ perspectives would provide the
opportunity to bring together theories from these various sectors of research.
The findings would highlight the similarities between, differences between and
intersections of these theories and how the concept of the learning organization,
vis-Ă -vis these theories, has been utilized by hospitals and health care institutions.
An analysis that identifies the interplay and intersections among the identified theories
would provide a more holistic representation of hospitals as learning organizations.
Thus, an answer to the question, âAre learning organizations the answer to improving
hospital care?â could provide essential information to hospital administrators who are
responsible for ensuring that their hospital operates efficiently and provides appropriate
health care to patients.
Learning organizations in practice
The development of a conceptual framework could include the characteristics of
hospitals as learning organizations; the key elements of success, including the culture
of success; how the term âlearning organizationâ is used, by whom and for what
purpose; and case examples of hospitals as learning organizations. For example,
832
JHOM
28,6
DownloadedbyUniversitasGadjahMadaAt19:3210November2016(PT)
5. Birleson (1998) describes how the Maroondah Child and Adolescent Mental Health
Services took steps to becoming a learning organization. Becoming a learning
organization was deemed as a solution to the problem of continual change and
increasing consumer expectations. Through the use of a case study methodology, the
author described how the principles of learning organizations have been applied within
their hospital. An action research approach to change was used to support the process
of aligning the structure and culture of the hospital with the concept of the learning
organization. Although the findings are still preliminary, several positive outcomes
emerged as a result of implementing learning organization principles, such as: newly
implemented workload benchmarks have increased output, a patient satisfaction
study has established a baseline for quality improvement, healthcare providers
receive monthly feedback about workload activities, student placements are evaluated,
external research grant funding increased, and team meetings have been altered to
increase dialogue and sharing among team members. The author concludes that the
concept of the learning organization seems to be appropriate for improving their mental
health service.
Framing hospitals as learning organizations could help hospital administrators
address the need for a working balance that promotes a safety and patient care culture.
The current prevailing âculture of blameâ in health care has been suggested as a major
source of an unacceptably high number of medical errors (Khatri et al., 2009). Hospitals
can moved away from a âculture of blameâ by using change management principles
aligned with the concept of the learning organization. For example, Childrenâs Hospital
and Clinics in Minnesota instituted a new policy of âblameless reportingâ as one
strategy for building a supportive learning environment (Garvin, 2008). Hospital
administrators identified a problem- when something went wrong with patient care, the
last person who was involved in that care was blamed. They used a patient safety
approach that re-focused medical errors on the breakdown of systems rather than
mistakes made by staff. The policy replaced threatening terms with less emotionally
laden terms. For example, the term âincident reportâ was replaced by âsafety learning
reportâ. These reports encourage staff to tell the story of what happened and to suggest
improvements. The reports were confidential and could be submitted by staff on paper,
by phone or online. Their preliminary findings showed that healthcare providers began
identifying and reporting risks without fear of blame and the number of preventable
deaths and illness decreased. They concluded that as a result of these changes, their
hospital has become a safer place to both work and receive care.
The experiences of these hospitals could serve as a model to develop a learning
organization framework in other hospitals and healthcare organizations. These
examples illustrate how organizational culture plays a critical role in the health care
services and delivery process. Developing concrete measures for applying the concept
of the learning organization to advance the implementation of best practices,
interprofessional care and quality improvement in hospital settings will improve
patient care and healthcare provider satisfaction (see Figure 1). As illustrated by
the examples above, hospital administrators adapted core values of a learning
organization, such as knowledge sharing, risk taking, learning as a core value, the
need to learn and unlearn, and learning from errors into their organizations. The core
values, in both cases, were applied for the purposes of quality improvement and
interprofessional care. Both studies revealed outcomes that indicate increased dialogue
among interprofessional healthcare teams, improved patient satisfaction, and decrease
the number of preventable illness and deaths thereby increasing safety for both
833
Improving
hospital care
DownloadedbyUniversitasGadjahMadaAt19:3210November2016(PT)
6. patients and providers. These hospital administrators were able to implement
the concept of learning organizations to generate measurable data to show
improved hospital care.
Conclusion
Hospitals are structured to provide opportunities for clinical care and education for
patients, along with clinical education and training of future and current health care
providers (Aston et al., 2012) within an environment in which research and innovation
are core activities. Hospital administrators are expected to encourage and support
knowledge translation and exchange activities, such as translating new knowledge into
cost-effective best practices, developing new frameworks for delivering optimal care
and innovating interventions and medications to improve treatments and health
outcomes (Oborn et al., 2013; Sox, 2011). This viewpoint paper considered whether the
concept of learning organizations can provide a framework for measuring these
activities to improve hospital care.
A brief overview of the concept of learning organizations and how it can be
applied to improve services was described and explained. Two case studies of hospitals
that have implemented core characteristics of a learning organization to their settings
were provided. The outcomes of both case studies suggest that applying learning
organization principles into practice improves hospital care.
Inevitably, there are many tensions within the working environment of a hospital.
With regard to consumers, given that even a very small error could have irreversible
effects on patientsâ morbidity and mortality, as well as on the hospital and the
community, it can be argued that a quality orientation is more important in health care
than in any other sector (Carman, 2000). Although attempts have been made to account
for and measure the quality of services in hospitals (e.g. public scorecards), there is no
The Hospital as a Learning Organization
Examples of outcomes:
* Implementing workload benchmarks
* Establishing a baseline for quality improvement
* Monthly feedback for HCP
* Evaluation of student placement
* Altering team meetings to increase dialogue
* Moving away from a âculture of blameâ
OUTCOMES
Improving
interprofessional care
Implementation
of best practices
Continuous
quality improvement
CORE CHARACTERISTICS
PROCESS
Applying the core characteristics
Knowledge
sharing
Learning as
a core value
Learning and
unlearning
Learning
from errors
Attitude
of risk taking
Figure 1.
Overview of hospital as
learning organization
834
JHOM
28,6
DownloadedbyUniversitasGadjahMadaAt19:3210November2016(PT)
7. general agreement on how this should be measured (Mahmood and Mohammadreza,
2011). With regard to interprofessional care, the entrenched hierarchical structure
of hospitals often poses challenges for health care providers and learners alike to
communicate across professional boundaries and collaborate for learning (Baker et al.,
2011; Valentine et al., 2011). Unfortunately, this disinclination to communicate
and collaborate can adversely affect patient care and outcomes. It is known that
counterproductive hierarchical communication patterns derived from status
differences are partly responsible for many medical errors (Pian-Smith et al., 2009;
Ricci et al., 2012; Wu, 2000). While team functioning is pivotal to the quality of patient
care, there is limited guidance on how to identify and evaluate the dimensions and
behavioural aspects of team functioning that characterize high-performing
interprofessional health care teams (Sutton et al., 2011; Upenieks et al., 2010; West
and Lyubovnikova, 2013).
With regard to continuous quality improvement, health care providers and
administrators do not necessarily have easily accessible information on optimal care
provision, improved health outcomes and the identification of patient safety issues and
their solutions. Despite the volumes of research evidence available that may support
quality improvement, relatively little is disseminated and applied in clinical settings
(Cabana et al., 1999; Grol and Grimshaw, 1999; Lavis, 2009; Lemire et al., 2013; Tetzlaff
et al., 2009; Wallace et al., 2012).
Hospital care related to patient safety, interprofessional care and continuous quality
improvement were some of the challenges raised by hospital administrators. Medical
education informed by a sound review of literature and/or based on a theoretical
framework has been proposed as a means of meeting these challenges. The learning
organization has contributed to something new to our understanding of hospital care
by providing a mechanism for recognizing and appropriately managing medical errors,
facilitating teamwork among healthcare providers and designing measures to improve
the quality of patient care are long-term investments.
With the increased demand for accountability for quality care, fiscal responsibility and
positive patient outcomes, exploring hospitals as learning organizations is timely and
highly relevant to senior hospital administrators responsible for integrating best practices,
interprofessional care and quality improvement as a primary means of achieving these
outcomes. Applying the characteristics of a learning organization to hospitals could serve
as a first and necessary step in assisting hospital administrators to improve hospital care.
References
Ahmed, P., Loh, A. and Zairi, M. (1999), âCultures for continuous improvement and learningâ,
Total Quality Management, Vol. 10 No. 4/5, pp. 426-434.
Albert, M. (2004), âUnderstanding the debate on medical education research: a sociological
perspectiveâ, Academic Medicine, Vol. 79 No. 10, pp. 948-954.
Aston, S., Rheault, W., Arenson, C., Tappert, S.K., Stoecker, J., Orzoff, J., Galitski, H. and
Mackintosh, S. (2012), âInterprofessional education: a review and analysis of programs
from three academic health centresâ, Academic Medicine, Vol. 87 No. 8, pp. 949-955.
Baker, L., Egan-Lee, E., Martimianakis, M.A. and Reeves, S. (2011), âRelationship of power:
implications for interprofessional educationâ, Journal of Interprofressional Care, Vol. 25
No. 2, pp. 98-104.
Bell, R., Robinson, A. and See, C. (2013), âDo written mandatory accreditation standards for
residential care positively model learning organizations? Textual and critical discourse
analysisâ, International Journal of Nursing, Vol. 50 No. 11, pp. 1446-1458.
835
Improving
hospital care
DownloadedbyUniversitasGadjahMadaAt19:3210November2016(PT)
8. Birleson, P. (1998), âBuilding a learning organization in a child and adolescent mental health
serviceâ, Australian Review, Vol. 21 No. 3, pp. 223-240.
Birleson, P. (1999), âTurning child and adolescent mental-health service into learning
organizationsâ, Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry, Vol. 4 No. 2, pp. 265-274.
Cabana, M., Rand, C.S., Powe, R.R., Wu, A.W., Wilson, M.H., Abboud, P.A. and Rubin, H.R. (1999),
âWhy donât physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvementâ,
The Journal of the American Medical Association, Vol. 282 No. 15, pp. 1458-1465.
Carman, J.M. (2000), âPatient perception of service quality: combining the dimensionsâ, Journal of
Service Marketing, Vol. 14 No. 4, pp. 337-352.
Dowd, S.B. (2000), âOrganization learning and the learning organization in health careâ, Hospital
Material Management Quarterly, Vol. 12 No. 3, pp. 1-3.
Garrat, B. (1987), The Learning Organization, Fontana/Collins, London.
Garvin, D.A. (2008), âIs yours a learning organization?â, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 86 No. 3,
pp. 109-116.
Grol, R. and Grimshaw, J. (1999), âEvidence-based implementation of evidence-based medicineâ,
Joint Commission Journal on Quality Improvement, Vol. 25 No. 10, pp. 503-513.
Gronhaug, K. and Stone, R. (2012), âThe learning organizationâ, Competitiveness Review:
An International Business Journal, Vol. 22 No. 3, pp. 261-275.
Hill, R. (2006), âA measure of the learning organizationâ, Industrial & Commercial Training,
Vol. 28 No. 1, pp. 19-25.
Hodgkinson, M. (2000), âManagerial perceptions of barriers to becoming a learning organizationâ,
The Learning Organization, Vol. 7 No. 3, pp. 156-167.
Joiner, K., Castellanos, N. and Wartman, S.A. (2011), âResource allocation in academic health
centres: creating common metricsâ, Academic Medicine, Vol. 86 No. 9, pp. 1084-1092.
Khatri, N., Brown, G.D. and Hicks, L.L. (2009), âFrom a blame culture to a just culture in health
careâ, Health Care Management Review, Vol. 34 No. 4, pp. 312-322.
Kim, C.S., Spahlinger, D.A., Kin, J.M. and Billi, J.E. (2006), âLean health care: what can hospitals
lean from a world-class automaker?â, Journal of Hospital Medicine, Vol. 1 No. 3, pp. 191-199.
Lavis, J.N. (2009), âHow can we support the use of systematic reviews in policy making?â, PLOS
Medicine, Vol. 6 No. 11, pp. 35-48.
Lemire, M., Demers-Payette, O. and Jefferson-Falardeau, J. (2013), âDissemination of performance
information and continuous improvement: a narrative systematic reviewâ, Journal of
Health Organization and Management, Vol. 27 No. 4, pp. 449-478.
McDonald, R.E. and Srinivasan, N. (2004), âTechnological innovations in hospitals: what kind
of competitive advantage does adoption lead to?â, International Journal of Technology
Management, Vol. 28 No. 1, pp. 103-117.
Mahmood, N.M. and Mohammadreza, A. (2011), âHospital services quality assessment: hospitals
of Kerman university of medical sciences, as a tangible example of a developing countryâ,
International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance, Vol. 24 No. 1, pp. 57-66.
Margherita, A. and Secundo, G. (2011), âThe stakeholder university as learning model of the
exended enterpriseâ, Journal of Management Development, Vol. 30 No. 2, pp. 175-186.
Marsick, V.J. (2006), Work-Related Learning in the Workplace in Informal Strategic Learning in the
Workplace, Springer, Dordrecht.
Marsick, V.J. and Watkins, K.E. (2003), âDemonstrating the value of an organizationâs learning
culture: the dimensions of learning organization questionnaireâ, Advances in Developing
Human Resources, Vol. 5 No. 2, pp. 132-151.
836
JHOM
28,6
DownloadedbyUniversitasGadjahMadaAt19:3210November2016(PT)
9. Mishra, B. and Bhaskar, A.U. (2011), âKnowledge management in two learning organizationsâ,
Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 15 No. 2, pp. 344-359.
Nonaka, I. and Takeuchi, H. (1995), The Knowledge Creating Company, Oxford University Press,
New York, NY.
Oborn, E., Barrett, M. and Racko, G. (2013), âKnowledge translation in healthcare: incorporating
theories of learning and knowledge from the management literatureâ, Journal of Health
Organization and Management, Vol. 27 No. 4, pp. 412-431.
Pian-Smith, M.C., Simon, R., Minehart, R.D., Podraza, M., Rudolph, J., Walzer, I. and Rasmer, D.
(2009), âTeaching residents the two-challenge rule: a simulation-based approach to improve
education and patient safetyâ, Simulation in Healthcare: Journal of the Society for
Simulation in Healthcare, Vol. 4 No. 2, pp. 84-91.
Prokesch, S.E. (1997), âUnleashing the power of learning. an interview with British petroleumâs
John Browneâ, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 75 No. 5, pp. 146-168.
Rebelo, T.M. and Gomes, A.D. (2008), âOrganizational learning and the learning organization:
reviewing evolution for prospecting the futureâ, The Learning Organization, Vol. 15 No. 4,
pp. 294-308.
Ricci, M., Panos, A.L., Lincoln, J., Salerno, T.A. and Warshauer, L. (2012), âIs aviation a good
model to study human errors in health care?â, American Journal of Surgery, Vol. 203 No. 6,
p. 798.
Rowley, S.D. (2006), âThe journey of a teaching hospital to become a learning organizationâ,
Australian Health Review, Vol. 30 No. 2, pp. 232-240.
Samli, A.C. (2011), âDeveloping learning organizationsâ, in Samli, A.C. (Ed.), From Imagination
to Innovation: New Product Development for Quality of Life, Springer, New York, NY,
pp. 17-23.
Senge, P. (1990), The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization,
Century Business, London.
Senge, P. (1991), âThe learning organization made plainâ, Training and Development, Vol. 45
No. 10, pp. 37-44.
Senge, P. (1996), âLeading learning organizationsâ, Training and Development, Vol. 50 No. 12,
pp. 36-37.
Senge, P. (2006), The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization, 2nd ed.,
Century, London.
Sox, H.C. (2011), âCommentary: academic health centres and comparative effectiveness research:
opportunities and challengesâ, Academic Medicine, Vol. 86 No. 6, pp. 664-666.
Sutton, G., Liao, J., Jimmieson, N.L. and Restubog, S.L. (2011), âMeasuring multidisciplinary team
effectiveness in a ward-based healthcare setting: development of the team functioning
assessment toolâ, Journal for Healthcare Quality, Vol. 33 No. 3, pp. 10-24.
Tetzlaff, J., Tricco, A. and Moher, D. (2009), âKnowledge synthesisâ, in Straus, S., Tetroe, J. and
Graham, I. (Eds), Knowledge Translation in Health Care, Wiley-Blackwell, BMJ Books,
Oxford, pp. 29-50.
Tosey, P. and Mathison, J. (2008), âDo organizations learn? Some implications for HRD of
batesonâs levels of learningâ, Human Resource Development Review, Vol. 7 No. 1, pp. 13-31.
Upenieks, V.V., Lee, E.A., Flanagan, M.E. and Doebbeling, B.N. (2010), âHealthcare team vitality
instrument (HTVI): developing a tool assessing healthcare team functioningâ, Journal of
Advanced Nursing, Vol. 66 No. 1, pp. 168-176.
Valentine, M.A., Nembhard, I.M. and Edmondson, A.C. (2011), Measuring Teamwork in Health
Care Settings: A Review of Survey Instruments, Harvard Business School, Boston, MA.
837
Improving
hospital care
DownloadedbyUniversitasGadjahMadaAt19:3210November2016(PT)
10. Vassalou, L. (2001), âThe learning organization in health-care services: theory and practiceâ,
Journal of European Industrial Training, Vol. 25 No. 7, pp. 354-365.
Wallace, J., Nwosu, B. and Clarke, M. (2012), âBarriers to the uptake of evidence from systematic
reviews and meta-analyses: a systematic review of decision makersâ perceptionsâ, BMJ
Open, Vol. 2 No. 5, pp. 1-14
West, M.A. and Lyubovnikova, J. (2013), âIllusions of team working in health careâ, Journal of
Health Organization and Management, Vol. 27 No. 1, pp. 134-142.
Wu, A.W. (2000), âMedical error: the second victimâ, British Medical Journal, Vol. 320 No. 7237,
p. 726.
Yedema, A.P., Boendermaker, P.M. and Pols, J. (2007), âHoe (in)formeel leren assistenten in
opleiding tot specialist hun taken en werkzaamheden uit te voeren? Eerste verkenningen
(in what account do residents learn to perform their tasks and activities (in)formal?
First exploration)â, Tijdschrift Voor Medisch Onderwijs, Vol. 26 No. 4, pp. 158-166.
Further reading
Conner, M.L. and Clawson, J.G. (2004), Creating a Learning Culture: Strategy, Technology, and
Practice, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Senge, P., Kleiner, A., Roberts, C., Ross, R., Roth, G. and Smith, B. (1999), The Dance of Change:
The Challenges of Sustaining the Learning Organization, Doubleday, New York, NY.
Corresponding author
Dr Sophie Soklaridis can be contacted at: sophie.soklaridis@camh.ca
To purchase reprints of this article please e-mail: reprints@emeraldinsight.com
Or visit our web site for further details: www.emeraldinsight.com/reprints
838
JHOM
28,6
DownloadedbyUniversitasGadjahMadaAt19:3210November2016(PT)