The document discusses miRNA biogenesis, isolation, quantification, and applications. It describes how miRNAs are noncoding RNAs that regulate gene expression post-transcriptionally through imperfect base pairing. Several methods are discussed for isolating miRNAs from different sample types like plasma, urine, and cells using specific kits or a single optimized protocol. Quantitative PCR methods for miRNA quantification and their advantages are also summarized, including using stem-loop primers and S-poly(T) primers which provide accurate, specific and sensitive results. In conclusion, the choice of sample and isolation/quantification method depends on the research needs and available protocols/kits, and miRNAs have potential as novel diagnostic and therapeutic targets.
31. Conclusion:
Specific miRNA isolation kit from different clinical
samples or opting single optimized protocol for
different clinical samples.
The choice of sample for miRNA should be done in
accordance to the available kits and protocols and the
requirement of the research.
S-poly(oligodT) primer based RT reaction give the
accurate, specific, sensitive results.
miRNA play an important role in different pathological
conditions and so it is a novel molecular marker for
diagnosis and also novel therapeutic strategy.
Editor's Notes
Possible mechanisms for miRNA gene regulation. Unregulated mRNAs engage with the initiation factor eIF4F complex, which is composed of eIF4A, eIF4E and eIF4G subunitsand recruits ribosomal subunits, which form circularized structures that enhance translation (upper left). When miRISC binds to target mRNAs, a high degree of miRNA–mRNAcomplementarity facilitates Ago-catalyzed degradation of target mRNA sequences through mRNA cleavage mechanisms (lower left). Alternatively, central mismatches preventdegradation and facilitate translational repression by any of four (a–d) possible mechanisms (right): (a) miRISCs bind to target mRNAs and represses initiation at the cap recognitionstage, or at (b) the 60S ribosomal recruitment stage, (c) miRISC can prevent mRNA to circularize (d) miRISC attachment to target mRNAs also facilitates premature separation fromribosomes, which represses translation at the postinitiation stag
Choice of samples. A, Workflowfor the preparation of platelet-poorplasma (PPP) from platelet-rich plasma(PRP). Addition of prostacyclin inhibitsplatelet activation during centrifugation.B, Concerns with regards to miRNAmeasurements in the different samplesrange from a contamination withleukocytes in PRP, proteolytic activity inserum to residual platelets in plasma. PRPand serum should reflect platelet miRNAcontent; PPP platelet miRNA release;plasma samples will reflect extracellularmiRNA content but may additionally reflecteither, platelet miRNA content or release.This depends on the amount of residualplatelets in the plasma samples or plateletactivation during plasma preparation, inparticular during centrifugation.
Samples were precipitated (200 μL) with both method 1 (KCH3COOH and final precipitationwith 2.5 M LiCl plus ethanol) and method 2 (2.5 M LiCl and ethanol directly after chloroformtreatmen
Q-PCR amplifcation plot of amplicon generated usingmature miR-21 isolated from (A) TH-29 cell line, (B) plasma, and(C) urine cells with different methods.
Q-PCR amplifcation profles of miR-21 using KCH3COOHmethod. (A) The amounts of cDNA used for q-PCR with differentdilution factors as follows: 1 (1 μg); 2 (10-1 μg); 3 (10-2 μg); 4 (10-3μg); 5 (10-4 μg); 6 (negative control); 7 (water control). (B) Meltingcurve. (C) Standard plot.
Nucleic acid reagents used for and intermediate products generated in this method. A,Mature miRNA (blue). A-H, Light blue lines show the boundary of the mature miRNAsequence within the RT and qPCR reagent sequences; open arrowheads indicate directionsof polymerization. B, The stem-loop primer 5′ 6 nt annealed with mature miRNA 3′ 6 nt;RT, reverse transcriptase. C and D, First strand cDNA, after polymerization, C, and heatdenaturation, D. E, Forward primer with added 5′ nts. F, Second strand cDNA. G,Hydrolysis probe and reverse primer. H, PCR product defined by the 5′ termini of theforward and reverse primers.
Specificity of TaqMan miRNA assays between stem–loop and linearRT primers. Mature let-7a-specific assay was tested against let-7a, let-7e andpri-miR precursor let-7a-3. DCT represents the CT difference between twotargets or methods. A total of 1.5 · 108 copies of synthetic targets were addedto each RT reaction.
Dynamic range and sensitivity of the S-Poly(T) method used in miRNA quantification. A: Correlation of total RNA input to thethreshold cycle (Ct) value. Five miRNAs including hsa-miR-92a, hsa-miR-210, hsa-miR-16, hsa-miR-21 and hsa-miR-223 were assayed by the S-Poly(T)method with a series of 10-fold diluted total RNAs prepared from HEK293 cells. The amount of total RNA in each qPCR reaction was ranged from10 ng to 0.01 pg. The amplification efficiency was 96% (miR-92a), 95% (miR-210), 91% (miR-16), 90% (miR-90), and 101% (miR-223), respectively, andthe correlation coefficients (R2) for each miRNAs was .0.99. B: Amplification plot of hsa-miR-92a over seven orders of magnitude. NTC: no-templatecontrol; -RT: no-reverse transcriptase control. All PCR reactions were performed in triplicate.
*: miR-21, miR-16 and miR-210 were assayed with SYBR Green I, while miR-140-5p was assayed with universal (S-Poly(T)) or specific (stem-loop) Taqman probe.doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0048536.t001
A: Eight hsa-let-7 miRNAs (let-7a, let-7b, let-7c, let-7d,let-7e, let-7f, let-7g, let-7i) were individually over-expressed in HEK293 cells by a lentiviral vector. The expression levels of the eight hsa-let-7 miRNAswere compared between the control (transduced with blank lentiviral vector) and the hsa-let-7 miRNAs-overexpressing HEK293 cells. The expressionlevel of each hsa-let-7 miRNA in the hsa-let-7 miRNAs-overexpressing HEK293 cells (OE-7a,OE-7i) was shown as the fold change compared with thatin the control (Con). B: sequence alignment of eight hsa-let-7 miRNAs. Non-conserved nucleotides are shaded. C: discrimination of mature miRNAfrom pri- and/or pre- miRNA by the S-Poly(T) and Poly(A) methods. The total RNA overexpressing hsa-let-7b and hsa-let-7c were reverse transcribed tocDNA by the S-Poly(T) and Poly(A) methods, respectively. The PCR products were run on 4% agarose gel in sodium borate (SB) buffer. The arrowsindicate the amplification products of pri- and mature miRNAs.doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0048536.g004
MiRNAs profiling between hypoxic and normoxic HPASMC. A, B: The accuracy for quantification of miR-199a-3p (A) and miR-210(B) was evaluated in a high-throughput RT reaction. The number of pooled RT primers in a single RT reaction ranged from 1,360. C: Scatter plot ofrelative expression level of 721 miRNAs determined by S-Poly(T) qPCR. The relative expression of miRNA was calculated as 2‘-DCt and presented inthe logarithmic scale. The data on the line across both X and Y axes represented the constitutively expressed miRNAs. D, E: Significantly up-regulatedand down-regulated miRNAs. The expression of miRNAs was shown as fold change between hypoxia and normoxia. F: Scatter plot of the relativeexpression level of 246 miRNAs detected by LNA-based miRNA microarray. The relative expression of miRNA was calculated as Hy3/Hy5 ratio and thedata on the line across both X and Y axes represented the constitutively expressed miRNAs. G: Heat map showing the expression of miRNAs that aredifferentially expressed in hypoxic HPASMC compared with normoxic HPASMC. Red color denotes induction and blue color denotes suppression. H:Significantly up-regulated miRNAs verified by real-time PCR. The expression of miRNAs was shown as fold change between hypoxia and normoxia.Each bar represents mean 6 SD. Statistical s
A: Pooled total RNAs from 40 healthy human serum samples were used to assayhuman 1,080 miRNAs in the miRBase 16.0. A scatter plot of 518 human serum miRNAs with Ct ,35 assayed by S-Poly(T) method was shown. Arrowsindicate the most abundant miRNAs. B: Box-whisker plots of the three most abundant miRNAs, namely miR-648, miR-4298 and miR-16 in each healthyserum sample (n = 40). The boxes indicate the 75th and 25th percentiles. The whiskers denote the lowest and highest values. The lines inside theboxes indicate the median values.doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0048536.g006