Presentation from OIS@ASCRS 2016 Moderator: Elizabeth Yeu, MD Participants: David Chang, MD Eric Donnenfeld, MD Sherman Reeves, MD, MPH Denise Visco, MD Video Presentation: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GTiBOslQYlI&list=PL1dmdBNnPTZJBhQxPOp0vdNg3s3wtN2yw&index=37

1. SPOTLIGHT ON THE PREMIUM CHANNEL:
PANEL DISCUSSION
Elizabeth Yeu, MD
Moderated By:
David Chang, MD
Participants:
Eric Donnenfeld, MD
Sherman Reeves, MD, MPH Denise Visco, MD

3. –3rd year of this survey

5. LACS
1. Viable reimbursement streams
• 77% do not have confidence in viable
reimbursement stream
2. Refractive advantages
3. Availability of clinical data
• 36% believe not enough data
4. Patient flow and access
• 22-29% concerned about patient flow and access
5. Future confidence does not seem to be a
significant barrier
• 94% believe they will use LACS by 10 years into
future

6. Toric IOL
1. Acceptable levels of rotational error
•29% believe > 10 rotation does not affect outcome
2. Tx selection for moderate astigmatism
•49% would not implantToric IOL in 1.25 D cyl
3. Diagnostic information selection
•No single tool used in >40%
4. Calculations of SIA and posterior corneal
astigmatism (PCA)
•Only 29% account for PCA

7. Presbyopia
CorrectionTechnology
•Cost to patient is far and away the greatest
barrier to further conversion

8. Presbyopia
CorrectionTechnology
•Perceived loss of visual quality is a significant
barrier
• 41% of surgeons believes that contrast sensitivity significantly
worsens after implantation of a multifocal IOL
•Toric & PCIOLs: Management of post-op
refractive error
• Only 50% perform femto or manual LRIs