EECS 441 University of Michigan

2. Elevator Pitch
❑ For
❑ Who are dissatisfied with
❑ Our product is a
❑ That provides
❑ Unlike
❑ Our product
2

3. Changes to MVP1
❑ UI Improvements
❑ Recommendations
❑ Reminders
❑ Security
❑ Sorting mechanism upgrades
3

4. DEMO
4

5. 5
Feature Importance (1-5) Satisfaction (1-5)
4.75 4.13
3.88 4.00
4.5 4.62
Overall 4.38 4.25
Previous 4.29 3.33
User Testing Results

6. User Quotes
“There aren’t enough events posted.”
6
“The UI looks much better! I really liked that it
would remind me of upcoming saved events”
“I wanted to share an event with
a friend but there was no way to
do that.”

7. Hypothesis
If students had access to a singular place
where they could easily sort through and
save events, they would attend more
events and gain more satisfaction from
the events
7

8. Lessons Learned
❑ UI matters a lot!
❑ It’s much easier to build something than to get people to use it.
8