Join HRG audit expert Vanessa Brumfield as she reviews new and continued areas to focus on in 2021 when it comes to coding and documentation audits. Vanessa will also go over recommended strategies to prioritize these areas in this 30 minute complimentary HRG webinar.
Why resumed?
Improper payment measurements cannot be paused for an extended period w/o missing statutorily required due dates
Not sending documentation request for RY 2020, claims submitted 7/1/18 through 6/30/19
2020 data – collected from providers and suppliers that voluntarily submitted and from information they had
RY 2021 & 2022 adjusted data collection
Sample size reduction to account for provider/supplier difficulties during the pandemic
Claim Type
Part A, excluding hospital IPPS highest rate of improper payments for insufficient documentation and medical necessity with Part A(Hospital IPPs) showing the highest rate for incorrect coding.
Provider Type
Effective August 11, 2020, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) resumed Comprehensive Error Rate Testing (CERT) program activities that were temporarily suspended in response to the public health emergency (PHE) for the 2019-Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. Specifically, the CERT program resumed sending documentation request letters to and conducting phone calls with providers or suppliers to request medical documentation for claims in Reporting Year (RY) 2021 (claims submitted 7/1/2019 through 6/30/2020) and RY 2022 (claims submitted 7/1/2020 through 6/30/2021).
Verification of Documentation Sufficiency The RC determines whether the submitted documentation is appropriate and sufficient to complete the MR by evaluating if: ■ The documentation received supports the service billed ■ The documentation supports the requested sampling unit ■ The documentation supports the DOS ■ The documentation includes signed physician orders ■ The documentation includes approved certifications/re-certifications required by state policy The original MRR lists the specific supporting documentation that providers should send for each claim category. b. Verification of Service Provision in Accordance with State Policy The policy review includes review of the applicable state-specific Medicaid or CHIP policy related to the service on the claim. The procedure or service documented in the medical record is reviewed to determine if the service was covered under the state’s policy, if there were any applicable limitations (e.g., units, quantities), and if the provider’s service fell within those limitations. Source documentation for the review will include documented state policies, including non-covered benefit limitations, provider manuals, and the CFR. c. Confirmation of Medical Necessity of Service The medical necessity review includes review of the record to determine if the service provided was consistent with the symptoms or diagnosis under treatment. In addition, the review may also involve a contextual claim review of other services provided to determine the pattern and feasibility of the sampled service. This may include an entire MR to determine if the sampled service was medically necessary. Source documentation includes documented state policies, including medical necessity documentation guidelines the state used, provider manuals, and the CFR. d. Determination that the Service Rendered Matches the Service Codes Billed and Paid The coding validation involves confirming the diagnosis recorded by the provider and its relevance to the billed procedure code. The coding review includes reading the medical record documentation and applying applicable ICD-10 coding guidelines to ensure the code the provider Payment Error Rate Measurement Manual 48 billed and the payer paid is the most appropriate code and level of code for the service rendered and that the provider did not assign multiple codes when only one code is appropriate (unbundling). The RC does not perform coding reviews for long-term care payments since claims for these services are not paid based on ICD-10 codes. For the RC to determine whether it received appropriate and sufficient documentation, it evaluates if: ■ The medical record documentation is consistent with the code billed by the provider ■ The procedure codes are unbundled ■ The billed code is consistent with the provider’s diagnosis
The diagnosis code is appropriate (if relevant to the payment) ■ The diagnosis is included in the DRG (if relevant to the payment) ■ Another procedure code would be more appropriate e. Verification of Appropriate Physician Certification For long-term care, inpatient hospital services, and home health care, the review verifies the documentation contained a signed physician certification, if required by state policy.
Phase one audits will focus on making an early assessment of whether services such as evaluation and management, opioid use order, end-stage renal disease, and psychotherapy (Work Plan number W-00-21-35801) meet Medicare requirements.
Phase two audits will include additional audits of Medicare Part B telehealth services related to distant and originating site locations, virtual check-in services, electronic visits, remote patient monitoring, use of telehealth technology, and annual wellness visits to determine whether Medicare requirements are met.