The document provides an overview of the construction insurance market and recent developments: 1) Competition in the construction insurance market remains intense, with many insurers looking to underwrite quality risks, which benefits clients. However, oil price declines have impacted the energy industry and wider economy. 2) Aon has been brokering insurance for the Riyadh Metro project in Saudi Arabia, a major public transit project. The FAST consortium leading one section of the project received $7.8 billion in coverage for construction and maintenance phases. 3) While any one claim coverage seems to offer the most protection, an aggregate limit or separating limits for each project may provide more clarity and certainty, especially as claim sizes have

1. Risk. Reinsurance. Human Resources.
Aon Risk Solutions
Global Broking Centre | Construction
In this Issue
1 Raising the game in EMEA
2 Riyadh Metro: rapid transit
2 When any one claim might
not be the best approach
3 Measuring the political
risks facing your project
3 Building differentiation:
an underwriter’s view
4 Key contacts
Construction Newsletter
Foreword
We continue to see that the global economy remains dynamic with
a very real impact on the insurance market. Oil prices have fallen
by 50% in a relatively short period of time and the previously
booming energy industry is witnessing a decline in new projects
as companies cancel or postpone development plans and take
stock of the situation.
This has had a ripple effect on the wider economy, but having said this, we do continue
to see major projects going ahead, particularly in the power and infrastructure sectors.
Contractors continue to move to where the business is – and often in difficult locations -
as they compete hard to retain their market shares.
In the insurance market, competition remains intense, with an oversupply of capacity looking
to underwrite quality risks. This is good news for clients and efforts to improve and enhance
risk management is being recognised by the insurance market. At this stage, we see no sign
of a change of direction in the insurance market.
In this newsletter, we focus on the successes of our clients and provide insights into risk
management tools that are available to both project developers and contractors as they
seek to minimise their total cost of risk. We also provide the views of one of the market’s
leading construction underwriters on how he sees the market now and into the future.
We hope you will find this newsletter to be of interest.
James MacNeal
Managing Director of Construction and Power
Raising the game in EMEA
Aon has the world’s largest construction risk advisory group in the world. The level of
understanding that we have of the risks faced by contractors as they expand globally is
market-leading. Senior members of our EMEA construction team will meet in London on
30 June along with key members of the Construction Service Group to review how we can
further improve our collective value to our clients, offering advice and solutions that will
help our clients succeed.

2. Construction Newsletter | Issue 2, 2015 2
Riyadh Metro: rapid transit
When any one claim might not be the best approach
The Saudi city of Riyadh has global ambitions and its planned Riyadh Metro forms the backbone of a
major expansion of the city’s public transport system. Aon has been at the forefront of developments
since the inception of the project back in 2012 and has since been appointed by the FAST consortium
to broker coverage of its section of the project.
The planned metro comprises 85 stations and six lines, with more than 168 kilometres of track serving
the city centre, King Khalid International Airport and the King Abdullah financial district. Construction
is due to be completed by 2018, with the project expected to create 15,000 jobs.
The scope of the project includes the construction of 64.6 kilometres of rail track, 29.8 kilometres
of viaduct, 26.6 kilometres of underground track and 8.2 kilometres of overground track. The
consortium’s contract is worth USD 7.8 billion. The consortium is led by FCC Construccion, and
includes Samsung, Alstom, Strukton, Freussinet Saudi Arabia, Typsa and Setec.
Aon has placed coverage for a 60 month construction phase and a 24 month maintenance phase,
delivering insurance for the design, construction, operation and maintenance of Package 3 of the
Riyadh metro.
In late 2012 and early 2013 Aon Spain began working with the FAST consortium in the initial bid phase,
providing invaluable insurance advice for the project team. Our team was able to walk FAST’s project
manager through the Q&A process with Riyadh Metro’s principal, helping to create clarity around the
exposures and expectations associated with the project.
Later in 2013, we went to market with FAST’s risk and found there to be significant market appetite
to take on the project, sourcing a number of binding quotations. The level of support that we were
able to secure led to FAST opting for Aon and later that year we were chosen as the broker of choice
by the consortium.
Typically the limit of liability or indemnity relates to the maximum
amount of compensation achievable for a claim. It includes costs
incurred in the defence of the claim, payable within the limit of
liability or indemnity or in addition to the compensation.
Conventional wisdom would suggest that any one claim coverage
for exposures would offer the most complete coverage. In practice
it is extremely rare for multiple claims to be paid for the full liability
or indemnity during a given year. In fact, there are situations where
the definition of what constitutes a claim actually inhibits how much
can be recovered.
The potential weakness of any one claim coverage is in the definition
of what a claim is and/or the series clause that will seek to link similar
claims arising from the original mistake.
Insurers in the construction sector recognise that when projects are
undertaken a single aggregate limit does not always provide the
comfort required, and that alternative options need to be considered.
Single project liability or indemnity coverage can often deliver the
protection required, but it will only be an aggregate solution, one
that is at a higher cost than an annual practice policy.
A reinstatement of the annual practice policy’s limit can be an option,
but the method by which it is reinstated is critical, and clarity as to what
is an unrelated claim is complex. A simple solution is to purchase a
separate aggregate limit — where contractually required — for each
project within the annual arrangement.
The size of professional liability and indemnity claims has increased over
the years, whereas the frequency of such claims has remained fairly
constant. As such, frequency of severity should drive considerations and
encourage a shift away from low any one claim amounts towards higher
aggregate limits.
With professional liability and indemnity insurance proving plentiful in
the current market, there is a strong argument that any one claim
coverage is in fact not in the best interests of client. GBP 5 million of any
one claim coverage does in fact provides less certainty than GBP 10
million of aggregate coverage – and interestingly the cost of these two
alternatives are approximately the same.
Riyadh Metro: in figures
Riyadh: 8 million population by 2020
Riyadh Metro: 168 kilometres of track
Riyadh Metro: 85 stations
Package 3: USD 7.8 billion price tag
Driverless metro system: USD 1.5
billion price tag

3. Construction Newsletter | Issue 2, 2015 3
Measuring the political risks facing your project
Building differentiation: an underwriter’s view
In March, Aon London launched its 2015 Political Risk Map. The map
addresses the evolution of political risk in emerging economies, with
the fall in oil prices and associated instability in oil exporting countries
topping the list of risks facing global investors.
There is however grounds for cautious optimism in certain parts of
the world – particularly in Latin America – with the 2015 map seeing
a reduction in risk rating for the Dominican Republic, Ecuador
and Panama, as well as Georgia, Laos, Philippines, Swaziland
and Zimbabwe.
The strength of the dollar - largely as a result of falling oil prices – has
seen many emerging markets drained of foreign currency, increasing
non-payment risk. This problem is particularly acute in the CIS, where
currencies have been affected by the collapsing rouble. Non-payment
risks are further exacerbated by the sudden collapse in revenues
flowing to commodity exporters more generally.
Project cancellations and even nationalisation risks are likely to follow
in the wake of sudden budgetary constraints, as the harsh light of
economic reality forces exporting nations to re-assess spending
decisions taken during the boom years.
More obviously, there is a huge increased in political violence risk
associated with conflicts in Iraq, Libya, Ukraine, West Africa and
Yemen, and there is potential for those conflicts to spread further,
particularly if ISIS moves into power vacuums in other conflict areas,
notably in Libya.
Experience in construction-specific risk
Aon’s political risk team currently has five live insurance claims, three
of which relate to the construction sector. They consist of two non-
payment claims and one for the loss of a construction plant following
the outbreak of civil war.
The team is experienced in arranging coverage for investors and
contractors, including risks such as non-payment, confiscation,
political violence and non-honouring of arbitration awards. Our map
is part of a range of analytics tools that enable clients to establish and
monitor their political risk exposures.
Jon Wiegand, Head of Engineering and Construction in London for
Swiss Re Corporate Solutions, talks us through the state of the London
construction market, the importance of risk selection to insurers and
how carriers can differentiate their offering in the current market.
The construction insurance market continues to be affected by the
extended hang-over associated with the global economic downturn
of 2008. Construction projects fell away precipitously for several years
after the crash and whilst the sector has shown some improvement in
recent years, the sector is still yet to fully recover.
This recovery has more recently been stifled by weak energy prices,
stalled growth and global austerity – all of which are having a
continued impact on international construction projects.
At the same time, the strong returns achieved by insurers in recent
years have attracted considerable amounts of new capital into the
sector, much of it from institutional investors on the hunt for returns.
This additional capital and the pursuit of diversification have meant
that the number of insurers offering construction capacity in London
alone has trebled over the last 10 years, creating fierce competition in
the market.
Regional capacity has also grown significantly as insurers look to build
closer relationships with clients in order to win and retain construction
business. London continues to maintain its strong position by offering
differentiated products such as bespoke policy wordings and a
continued appetite for construction projects ranging from millions to
billions in insured values and from technically simple to complex
multinational projects.
Risk selection
The current soft market
conditions are encouraging
insurers to focus even more
closely on the active risk
selection approach followed
by the top tier insurers,
providing increased appetite,
broader coverage and more
competitive prices for the best
managed and presented risks.
Few are pursuing the portfolio
approach which is more suited
to hard market conditions.
Risk selection tends to be made on the basis of the quality of the
underwriting submission in addition to the client’s willingness to
retain risk and thereby demonstrate the strength of their risk
management. The clients attracting the best terms and conditions for
their projects are typically those who engage closely with insurers –
through technical project presentations and insurer risk surveys.
For those clients able to satisfy the highest risk selection criteria,
they can expect to benefit from competitive terms and greater
participation of higher quality insurers which will in turn result
from more efficient policy administration and claims handling.
Insurers also place great value on clients looking to build and
maintain long term partnerships across multiple lines of business
including engineering.
Jon Wiegand
Head of Engineering and
Construction, London
Swiss Re Corporate Solutions

4. The value of the broker cannot be underestimated and they should
add value throughout all stages of the placement – from submission
to closing. The current level of fierce market competition also extends
to brokers as they fight for client’s business. Clients need to be
diligent in their broker selection process to ensure that they benefit
not only from the best coverage and security available, but also from
an accurate policy wording that will reduce the chances of
misinterpretation of cover and help clients and insurers avoid costly
litigation which is in all parties best interest.
Insurer differentiation
When it comes to how insurers differentiate their offerings, the quality
of their security remains a critical factor. Clients also need to consider
the longevity of their insurers – if they are looking to benefit from long
term partnerships with insurers, they need to consider whether their
insurers will still be participating in the construction market in three or
four years’ time.
Best in class insurers need to not only demonstrate a client-focused
claims handling philosophy, which will be responsive and effective
should the worst happen, but also offer product innovation and the
ability to support clients across multiple lines of business.
These insurers will stand by their clients throughout the project
lifecycle and be able to tailor the insurance policy to the dynamic
nature of construction projects. Insurers should also look to
contribute to the success of the project such as the provision of an
insurer risk management program, which can help provide the project
with a qualified external perspective regarding lessons learned from
other projects throughout the world.
Simon Simpson
UK Construction
+44 (0)20 7086 2003
simon.simpson@aon.co.uk
Warren Beardall
PPP
+44 (0)20 7086 4328
warren.beardall@aon.co.uk
Mark Holt
Surety
+44 (0)20 7086 0576
mark.holt@aon.co.uk
Michael Earp
Professional Indemnity
+44 (0)20 7086 4414
michael.earp@aon.co.uk
James MacNeal
Construction, Power
+44 (0)20 7086 4353
james.macneall@aon.co.uk
Bob Humphreys
International Construction
+44 (0)20 7086 0653
robert.humphreys@aon.co.uk
Peter Rudd
International Construction
+44 (0)20 7086 4332
peter.rudd@aon.co.uk
Charles Keville
Technical Director, PRI
+44 (0)20 7086 3098
charles.r.keville@aon.co.uk
Key contacts
About Aon
Aon plc (NYSE:AON) is a leading global provider of risk management, insurance brokerage and reinsurance brokerage, and
human resources solutions and outsourcing services. Through its more than 69,000 colleagues worldwide, Aon unites to
empower results for clients in over 120 countries via innovative risk and people solutions. For further information on our
capabilities and to learn how we empower results for clients, please visit: http://aon.mediaroom.com.
© Aon plc 2015. All rights reserved.
The information contained herein and the statements expressed are of a general nature and are not intended to address the circumstances of any particular
individual or entity. Although we endeavor to provide accurate and timely information and use sources we consider reliable, there can be no guarantee that
such information is accurate as of the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future.
No one should act on such information without appropriate professional advice after a thorough examination of the particular situation.
Aon UK Limited is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority.
FP GBCC0001