15. Standard interfaces
Facial masks
advantages:
– sufficient ventilation also
during mouth breathing
– sufficient ventilation in patients
with limited co-operation
disadvantages:
– coughing is difficult
– skin lesions (bridge of the nose)
16. Nasal masks
advantages:
– better comfort
– good seal
– coughing is possible
– communication is possible
disadvantages:
– effective in nose breathing only
– good co-operation is necessary
Standard interfaces
17. Nasal prong/nasal pillow systems
for patients with
claustrophobia
for patients with allergies
against straps
for low to moderate
pressures only
(< 20 cmH2O)
Standard interfaces
18. total-face masks
• Safe interface for acute respiratory
insufficiency with high pressures
• well tolerated by the patients
Standard interfaces
19. helmet
• well tolerated by the patient
• no direct contact to the skin of
the face
• large dead space
• may influence the triggering of
the patient; use with CPAP
• very noisy
Standard interfaces
20. mouthpieces
• simple and cheap
• short-interval alternative
interface for long-term
ventilated patients
Custom-made masks
• for long-term ventilation
• if standard masks are not
tolerated
Standard interfaces
21. Physiologic evaluation of three
different interfaces
cohort: 26 stable patients with hypercapnic COPD or interstitial lung disease.
intervention: three 30 minute tests in two ventilatory modes with
facial mask / nasal mask / nasal prongs
Conclusions: NIPPV was effective with all interfaces.
patients„ tolerance: nasal mask > facial mask or nasal prongs
pCO2 reduction: facial mask or nasal prongs > nasal mask
Navalesi P et al. Crit Care Med 2000;28:2139-2140
32. Rationale for
Non-invasive Ventilation (NIV)
to improve respiratory function and symptoms
• blood gases
• dyspnea
• respiratory rate
to avoid intubation and related complications
• ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP)
- i.e. tube associated pneumonia
• local complications related to tube (early & late)
• complications related to catheterization
• tracheostomy and weaning failure
to improve outcome
• to reduce length of ICU and hospital stay
• mortality
39. MORTALITY OF PATIENTS WITH COPD
REQUIRING INVASIVE MECHANICAL
VENTILATION FOR ACUTE RESPIRATORY
FAILURE
study year In-hospital Mortality, %
Knaus 1989 42
Stauffer et al 1993 33
Rieves et al 1993 43
Seneff et al 1995 32
Brochard et al 1995 29
Corrado et al 1998 27
Hill et al 1998 49
41. Lightowler JV. et al. BMJ 2003; 326:185-
• NIV prevents intubation
(NNT = 5)
• NIV reduces mortality
(NNT = 8)
NNT = number needed to treat
42. META-ANALYSIS (N=8)
• NIV resulted in
– decreased mortality (RR 0.41; 95% CI 0.26,
0.64),
– decreased need for ETI (RR 0.42; 95%CI
0.31, 0.59)
• Greater improvements within 1 hour in
– pH (WMD 0.03; 95%CI 0.02, 0.04),
– PaCO2 (WMD -0.40 kPa; 95%CI -0.78, -
0.03),
– RR (WMD –3.08 bpm; 95%CI –4.26, -1.89).
• Complications associated with treatment (RR
0.32; 95%CI 0.18, 0.56) and length of hospital
stay were also reduced with NPPV (WMD –
3.24 days; 95%CI –4.42, -2.06)
Lightowler, Elliott, Wedzicha & Ram BMJ 2003; 326:185
43. Lightowler JV. et al. BMJ 2003; 326:185-
189
Conclusions
NIV should be the first line intervention in addition to
usual medical care to manage respiratory failure
secondary to an acute exacerbation of chronic
obstructive pulmonary disease in all suitable
patients.
NIV should be tried early in the course of respiratory
failure and before severe acidosis,
to reduce mortality, avoid endotracheal intubation,
and decrease treatment failure.
first
line
pH:
7.20–7,35
Improves
outcome
NIV:
44. Confalonieri, et al. AJRCCM 1999; 160: 1585-1591
• 56 Pats with Pneumonia
• 23 COPD - 33 non-COPD
• Prospektive RCT:
- PSV + Standard-treatment
- O2 + Standard-treatment
45. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1999;160:1585-15
*
PaCO2 [mmHg]
Intubation [%]
ICU – length of stay [d]
2-Mo-moratliy [%]
NIV Standard
73
0
<1
11
68
55
8
63
32
38
3
43
34
47
5
33
NIV Standard
*p < 0.05
COPD (n = 23) Non-COPD (n = 33)
* *
*
* *
46. NIV in weaning: Early extubation
NIV in the weaning of patients with respiratory
failure due to COPD
47. NIV in weaning: Early extubation
24-36 hrs of PSV
50 patients
2 hr T-piece trial
failed
Randomized
NIV to 25 br/min, ABGs
6 by 2-4 cmH20/day
SBT 2 x/day
IPSV to 25 br/min, ABGs
“gradually” 6
CPAP or T piece, 2 x/day
Nava et al. Ann Intern Med 1998;128:721-8
NIV in the weaning of patients with respiratory failure due to
COPD
48. Invasive MV
NIV
Weaning success with NIV
NIV in the weaning of patients with ARF due to COPD
Nava et al. Ann Intern Med. 1998;128:721-8
NIV in weaning: Early extubation
49. NIV to wean from respirator in stable COPD
Nava et al. Ann Intern Med 1998;128:721-8
Invasive Non-invasive
MV days 17 10*
ICU days 24 15*
60d wean success 68% 88% *
60 d survival 72% 92% *
Pneumonia 25% 0% *
wean failure: death from MV and reintubation in 72h
52. Moretti M. et al. Thorax 2000;55:819-82
N= 137
Patients with
NIV success*
*NIV > 24 Std.
N= 31
Patients with late
NIV-failure after
primary NIV-success*
23%
Acute exacerbation of COPD
after 48 hours
Mortality IMV 53%, continuing NIV 92%
(NIV group pH 7.1 IMV 7.29)
Late failure predicted by low ADL scores,
pH and co-morbidity at admission
53. Moretti M. et al. Thorax 2000;55:819-8
Late NIV failure:
• lower pH at admission
• higher complication rates
• ICU-Mortality
• 92% when NIV was continued
• 53% when intubation was performe
54. Invasive MV instead of NIV
- in terms of clinical issues
Invasive MV
Lavage
bei Hypersecretion
Unloading
respir. muscles
Improvement of
neurophysiologic
situation
Aim: Extubation after 2-3 day
- with/without consecutive NIV
Massive hypersecretion Massive Load
on respir. muscles
Neurophysiologic
disaster
60. Flandreau G et al. Management and long-term outcome of patients with chronic
neuromuscular disease admitted to the intensive care unit for acute respiratory failure:
a single-center retrospective study. Respir Care 2011; 56: 953 – 960
Special indication for NIV in acute hypercapnia
Neuromuscular disease
73. Targets of ventilation in
cardiogenic pulmonary oedema
• improvement of oxygenation
• improvement of respiratory acidosis
• reduction of work of breathing
• improvement of cardiac performance
• reduction of patient’s distress
81. Conclusions
Multiple organ failure and pneumonia were the main factors associated with
NIV failure and death in morbidly obese patients in hypoxic ARF. On the
opposite, NIV was constantly successful and could be safely pushed further in
case of severe hypercapnic acute respiratory decompensation of OHS.
82. Potential goals of noninvasive ventilation (NIV) in severe acute asthma.
Dean R Hess Respir Care 2013;58:950-972
(c) 2012 by Daedalus Enterprises,Inc.
83. Bronchoscope inserted through the swivel adaptor of a face mask for noninvasive ventilation.
Dean R Hess Respir Care 2013;58:950-972
(c) 2012 by Daedalus Enterprises,Inc.
85. AIMS
Goals of monitoring
Types of monitoring
Setting for monitoring
Goals of monitoring
Types of monitoring
Setting for monitoring
86. Why we need Monitoring during MV?
To Assess the effectiveness of MV in
-Unloading respiratory muscles
-Correcting gas exchange abnormalities
-Improving alveolar ventilation
To Identify complications during MV
-correlated with MV
-correlated with ARF
To predict patient’s outcome in terms of
-Survival
-Dependence on MV
-Autonomy in performing ADLs
87. Is Monitoring less important during
NIV? Airways not protected
Presence of leaks
Lack of sedation
Use outside ICU
88. Which goals of Monitoring during NIV?
To Assess the effectiveness of NIV in
-Unloading respiratory muscles
-Correcting gas exchange abnormalities
-Improving alveolar ventilation
-Patient-ventilatory synchrony
To Identify complications during NIV
-correlated with NIV
-correlated with ARF
To predict patient’s outcome in terms of
- NIV failure (i.e. Need of ETI)
-Survival
-Dependence on MV
-Autonomy in performing ADLs
To Assess the effectiveness of NIV in
-Unloading respiratory muscles
-Correcting gas exchange abnormalities
-Improving alveolar ventilation
-Patient-ventilatory synchrony
To Identify complications during NIV
-correlated with NIV
-correlated with ARF
To predict patient’s outcome in terms of
- NIV failure (i.e. Need of ETI)
-Survival
-Dependence on MV
-Autonomy in performing ADLs
104. 46 pts with ARF under NIV (Range PaCO2: 33-91 mmHg) -TCM4: trunk
PtCO2 sensor
Under-estimation of PaCO2 in pts
with greater hypercapnia (PaCO>60
mmHg)
105. TREND OF TC-PCO2
Kocher S et al, J Clin Monitor Comput 2004
Domingo Ch et al, Arch Bronchoneumol 2006
106. Arterial blood gas-analysis
Gold standard
Oxygenation status (PaO2/FiO2
ratio)
Ventilatory status (PaCO2)
Metabolic status (pH/HCO3)
Co-oximetry (COHb)
Weak points:
-Invasive
procedure
-Spot data
Prognostic
value
-Baseline
-After 1-2 hrs
-Late failure
107. Antonelli M. et al. Crit Care Med 2007;35(1):18-25
PaO2/FiO2 during NIV in
ARDS
108. pH at baseline in COPD exacerbations
Nava S. et al., Intensive Care Med 2006; 32(3):361-70.
110. How to assess RR on spont
breathing?
Clinical
evaluation
Impedenzometry
Capnography
Pnemotacograph
111. Schettino G. et al., Crit Care Med 2008;36(2):441-7
Reasons for NIV failure
Cardiovascular
monitoring
(ECG, NIBP, PR)
112. Helpful in
Understanding the causes of nocturnal desaturations
Re-Setting the ventilator
Janssens JP et al. Thorax 2011;66(5):438-45
Sleep monitoring
124. Berg KM et al., Respir Care 2012;57:1548-54
Respiratory pattern and NIV
Failure
INTUBATION
aRSBI= RR/exp- TV during NIV
Exp TV = pt TV
HOW COULD WE MONITOR exp-TV and RR DURING NIV?
129. How to Reduce Air Leaks During NIV
Proper interface type and
size
Proper securing system
Mask-support ring
Comfort flaps
Tube adapter
Hydrogel or foam seals
Chin strap
Lips seal or mouth taping
Nava S et al. Respiratory Care 2009; 54: 71-82
Mask occlusion pressure = Pmask-fit – Paw
130.
131. How to Reduce the Risk of Skin
Damage During NIV
Proper harness and tightening
Skin and mask hygiene
ava S et al. Respiratory Care 2009;54:71-82
Nasal-forehead spacer
• To reduce the pressure on the bridge of the
nose
Forehead and skin pads
• To obtain the most comfortable position
Cushioning system between mask prong and
forehead
Remove patient’s dentures when making
impression for moulded mask
In home care, replace the mask according
to the patient’s daily use
136. • Not always appear
where expected!!!
Pressure ulcer
137. Predictors of failure: NIV for hypercapnic
respiratory failure
Advanced age
Higher acuity of illness (APACHE score)
Uncooperative
Poor neurological score
Unable to coordinate breathing with ventilator
Large air leaks
Edentulous
Tachypnoea (>35/min)
Acidaemia (pH <7.18)
Failure to improve pH, heart and respiratory rates or
Glasgow Coma Score within the first 2 hours
Soo Hoo et al. Crit Care Med 1994; 22: 1253–61
Ambrosino et al. Thorax 1995; 50: 755–7
Confalonieri et al. Eur Respir J 2005; 25: 348–55
142. • Eight ICUs
• n=354:
• Success: 246
• Failure: 108
Other predictors of
failure:
Higher SAPS
Lower PaO2/FIO2 and
failure to improve
Low pH
Older age
Septic shock, MOF
143. Common reasons for NIV failure
Environmental/caregiver team
factors
• Lack of skilled, experienced caregiver
team
• Poor patient selection
• Lack of adequate monitoring
Selection guidelines for NIV in the acute setting
Appropriate diagnosis with potential reversibility (COPD,
congestive heart failure, …..)
Establish need for ventilatory assistance:
• Moderate to severe respiratory distress
and
• Tachypnoea (>24/min for COPD, >30/min for CHF)
• Accessory muscle use or abdominal paradox motion
• Blood gas derangement: pH <7.35, PaCO2 >45, or
PaO2/FiO2 <300
144. Contraindications of NIV
Respiratory or cardiac arrest
Too unstable patient:
• Shock
• Myocardial infarction
requiring intervention
• Uncontrolled ischemia or
arrhythmias
• Uncontrolled upper GI bleed
• Non-evacuated pneumothorax
Unable to protect airway*
• Excessive secretions
• Poor cough
• Impaired swallowing
*Relative contraindications?
Aspiration risk*
• Distended bowel; obstruction
or ileus
• Frequent vomiting
Uncooperative or agitated*
Unable to fit mask
Recent upper airway or
oesophageal surgery
Multiple organ system failure
(>2)
145. Common reasons for NIV failure
Patient-related factors
• Intolerance
• Mask problems:
• Discomfort
• Poor fit
• Skin ulceration
• Claustrophobia
• Agitation
• Excessive secretions, inability to protect
airway
• Progression of underlying disease
147. Common reasons for NIV failure
Technical factors
• Inadequate equipment
• Failure to ventilate
• Failure to oxygenate
• Patient–ventilatorasynchrony
• Air leaks
148. Successful NIV: Important
factors
More likely with a good team
• A skilled, experienced staff helps to optimize outcomes
The underlying disease is an important
determinant
• Selecting appropriate patients and monitoring them
closely
Severity at presentation
Change in physiology after a short period of NIV
• If failure to ventilate or oxygenate, rapidly assess for
reversible contributing factors
• Be prepared to intubate without undue delay if rapid
reversal cannot be achieved (particularly in hypoxemic
patients)
A systematic approach to troubleshooting can help