World War I Foreign Policy Essay

World War I Foreign Policy Essay
Foreign Policy is our government's strategy for dealing with other nations. Throughout this paper I will be talking about different examples of foreign
policy and how our nation deals with other nations.The development of foreign policy is influenced by domestic considerations, the policies or
behaviours of other states, oe plans to advance specific geopolitical designs. A foreignpolicy should protect the integrity of the country and the interests
of its citizens. The foreign policy of a country should promote its national interests of the country. Foreign policy should also promote economic
interests of the country. Foreign policy has long–lasting consequences. Some of the people making decisions on foreign policy won't live long enough
...show more content...
World War I was started when Archduke Franz Ferdinand ,heir to the Austro
–Hungarian Empire, was assassinated. Austria–Hungary declared war on
Serbia and the peace between Europe's great powers fell quickly. Germany invaded belgium in the first battle of World War I assaulting the city
Leige and captured the city in eleven days (History.com Staff). During the siege they shot civilians and executed a belgian priest. They went
through Belgium and advanced toward France. French and British forces drove the Germans back after they made it within thirty miles of Paris.
The defeat meant the end of German plans for a fast victory in France. Russian forces attacked the German held portions of East Prussia and
Poland. Russian forces were stopped by Germany and Austria in August, 1914 (History.com Staff). America stayed out of World War I with the
policy of neutrality which was favored by president Woodrow Wilson. The cause of America joining World War I and declaring war on germany was
the sinking of U.S. merchant ships. "At the Paris Peace Conference in 1919, Allied leaders would state their desire to build a post–war world that
would safeguard itself against future conflicts of such devastating scale"(History.com Staff). Some participants called World War I the War to End
All Wars. The Treaty of Versailles gave Germany heavy reparations and they were also denied entrance to the League of Nations. Germany felt
tricked into signing the treaty. Hatred of the Versailles treaty as years passed settled into a smoldering resentment in Germany which was one of the
causes of World War II two decades later. World War II involved more than thirty countries and resulted in more than fifty million military and civilian
deaths (History.com Staff). The war started when germany invaded Poland and went on for six years. What allowed Hitler to invade Poland was when
he signed a nonaggression pact with soviet leader Joseph Stalin so
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

U.S. Foreign Policy Essay
Throughout the course of history, the United States has remained consistent with its national interest by taking many different actions in foreign policy.
There have been both immediate and long term results of these actions. Foreign policy is the United States policy that defines how we deal with other
countries economically and politically. It is made by congress, the president, and the people. Some of the motivations for United States foreign policy
are national security, economics, and idealism. The United States entry intoWorld War Iin 1917 and the escalation of the Vietnam War in 1964 and the
both had great impact on the United States.
A major type of foreign policy in the 1964 was containment. The Vietnam War was fought
...show more content...
The goals of this foreign policy was to end communism containment while starting democracies. For the United States, the war ended in the withdrawal
of American troops and the failure of its foreign policy in Vietnam.
Another major foreign policy action was the entry to World War I. On August 4, 1914 there was an outbreak in Europe. A war started between the
central powers and the allied powers. The central powers consisted of Germany, Austria–Hungry, and the Ottoman Empire. They were also known as
the Triple Alliance. The Allied Powers, also know as the Triple Entente consisted of Britain, France, and Russia. An immediate cause of the war was
the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand in 1914. Some long term causes that started the war were militarism, alliances, imperialism, and
nationalism. America tried to keep themselves isolated from the war in Europe. Before the war, America had an idea of neutrality. Neutrality is when
American lives and property is not threatened. There was great ethnic diversity in the United States which led to a public union about war. The United
States also had the idea of freedom of the seas. This meant the routes for trading were open. The United States had the desire to trade with both the
central and the allied powers. The United States had a great economic interest in the war at this time. There were many different

Domestic and Foreign Policies Essay
Domestic and Foreign Policies Throughout our history, many policies have been made to deal with domestic or foreign issues or conflicts. One
example of domestic policies were the reforms FDR created called the New Deal. An example of a foreign policy was that of containment used after
WW2. In the 1930's our country and many others around the world went through a financial depression. The Depression was mostly attributed to the
stock market crash in 1929. President Hoover who served before FDR tried numerous things to try and help cure the depression. But by the time FDR
was elected in, the depression was still very much present. FDR was open to many different ideas to try and fix the economy....show more content...
FDR was undoubtedly one of the best leaders our country has seen, but it wasn't so easy for him. Two of the programs Roosevelt instituted were
declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court. The National Recovery Administration enabled codes that called for, or encouraged businesses to
agree upon fair prices. One business complained that these codes were too much like laws. Therefore, the NRA gave legislative power to the president
that he shouldn't have had. The supreme court declared the administration unconstitutional. A similar case was brought to the supreme court. It said
that the codes that went along with the Agricultural Adjustment Act that had required a tax were also unconstitutional. In response to the supreme
court rulings FDR tried to raise the number of judges that sit in the supreme court from 9 to 15. He wanted to appoint justices that shared the same
views as his on. The congress didn't approve of the plan. Directly following world war two the United States and the Soviet Union emerged as the two
super powers of the world. Although the two countries were allies during the war, after the war they were common enemies. The U.S. strongly apposed
the political advances the Soviet Union was making. Directly after World War 2, The Soviet Union was quickly supporting communist revolutions
within the nations of Eastern

America's Foreign Policy Essay
To begin America's foreign policy has changed quite a lot. The first policy we had was the Monroe Doctrine which was established in 1823. The
policy provided precedent and support for U.S. expansion on the American continent. This meant Europe could not interfere in Western
Hemisphere affairs and could not be involved in the expansion. Soon after that we were changing our policies again which lead us to Wilson's 14
points. Basically after we had entered WW1 we wanted to establish peace so we drew up specific recommendations for a comprehensive peace
settlement. As you can see already we are becoming more involved and our policies are allowing us to become a whole and make peace. Then once
again we were getting involved and our policies had to changed again we created the United Nations in 1945. It consisted of the following...show more
content...
The United Nations helps established peace and committing to maintain international peace and security. We at this point we're trying to develop
friendly relations to among nations. We were very involved around the world making sure everything and everybody was at peace. As time went on
we tried to allow the US to expand and get others to join our side. We created the Truman Doctrine. Which was asking for assistance from Greece and
Turkey to forestall communist domination of the two nations. This then changed our policy to allow the United States to support free people who are
resisting communist efforts to help resolve them. We had thought that if we were being involved it was going to better us. But that all changed and
so did our policies on 9/11. We were attacked and so we converted military operations, new security legislation, efforts to block the financing of
terrorism. We soon became involved in a different way we focused more on equality and adding people. We now pay close attention to what everyone
is doing to help keep us safe. Which leads us to the next

Us Foreign Policy Essay
Why is US foreign policy pulled to extreme of either doing too much or nothing at all?
The inability of U.S. foreign policy to stay effective is because America has committed itself to supporting alliances that have not proven to be mutually
beneficial. Foreign assistance, which is supposed to improve the well–being of recipient countries, goes directly to small coalitions. The United States,
with the fear of losing its position on the global stage, has committed itself to the conundrum of regime change which often produces little result.
Countries receiving foreign aid and military assistance have no incentives to build an effective bureaucracy or judicial system because these systems
can represent threats to incumbents based upon local...show more content...
On the other hand, U.S. foreign policy was pulled to do nothing good to social improvements. The ultimate goal for U.S. foreign policy is to promote
democracy in recipient countries. However, this goal has failed several times. For example, America was too deeply trapped into the commitment to see
the real problems of South Vietnam. According to Hilton Root, the South Vietnam government's deepest vulnerability was its failure to win the
confidence of the peasantry. Like Chiang Kai–shek's loss of China, both the Diem and Thieu regimes failed to gain popular support from the rural
population. Without clearly seeing the needs of the rural population, America's effort to support South Vietnam and import democracy to this country
failed with the collapse of the South Vietnamese government. Furthermore, social conditions of South Vietnam were not mature enough for accepting
democratic style social reforms. According to Hilton Root, there was no cultural heritage in Vietnam that can link the individual rights to the cultural
legacy of the nationhood. Unlike the French and American social systems, which rest secure on social contract, the Vietnamese had no social contract
and Vietnamese social identity stemmed from loyalty to family or village rather than to the nationhood. The lack of both social

Purpose Of Foreign Policy
At first glance, the basic values of US foreign policy seem confusing and very difficult to figure out. The main purpose of Foreign Policy is to solve
international problems and prevent military action as much as possible. At first its purpose was to protect their commercial interests because our
military was week. After WWI, United States were helping the countries who were not financially able to take care of themselves. They were saving
money and selling their products that later when WW2 occurs, they can be ready. The 20th century was marked by two world wars in which the United
States, along with Allied powers, defeated its enemies and increased its international reputation. The United States followed an independent course, and

Advantages And Objectives Of Foreign Policy
INTRODUCTION Foreign policy can be said as the government's strategy in dealing with other nations. Other definition that could be derived on
foreign policy is, foreign policy is the strategies or steps selected by the government to achieve certain goals and missions. Foreign policy is another
strategic ways of being optimistic and proactive about finding ways for problems faced by nations or even to avoid certain unwanted circumstances and
calamities.
Goals of Foreign Policy
Welfare
One of the goals of foreign policy is to ensure the smoothness of the management of the welfare of the people in the country. The concept of welfare of
state is not only that the government have to provide needs for those who cannot provide themselves...show more content...
Free trade is the opposite of those two strategies which are the autarky and the mercantilism as they both are restricted trading. Free trade is a form
of economic integration. In free trade area, all tariffs and the restriction are thrown or denied. Free trade usually offers lower prices and the
producer usually tries to make the product with cheaper price as possible as it could be. In other way of understanding, free trade is the act of buy
and sell without the interference of government. Not only that, since trade between countries occur freely, customers have chance to buy goods
from other countries. The choices they have also increases and varies. Not only that, customer can also compare the prices of things they want to
buy between countries. In example, a person from Malaysia wants to buy a leather coat. So he find out that the coat he wants is available in
Australia and England. Therefore, he now can compare the prices and choose the one with a more reasonable price. This seems to be small if be
viewed on one person buying things but if we see it in a view point of a company buying products in loads such as a chocolate factory in Malaysia
that is looking for the best cocoa to make their chocolates found that cocoa is cheaper in Nigeria than any other states, therefore the company can find
their cocoa supplies from

John F Kennedy Foreign Policy Essay
Once every four years American citizens who are at least 18 years or older to vote for Presidents of the United State. The candidate who receives the
most Electoral College vote wins. A president cannot serve more than two terms or eight years. President John F. Kennedy was elected as the 35th
president of the United States in 1961 ("John F. Kennedy"). According to the White House biography, "John F. Kennedy", Based upon his civil right,
health care, and foreign John F. Kennedy was a successful president.
Importantly, President John F. Kennedy policy on foreign helped make a great president. According to Bureau of Public Affair, "Kennedy's foreign
Policy", Kennedy's formed alliance with Latin America to help poor women and man that suffer from hunger and poverty. The United State hoped that
Latin America will make the countries stronger. Next, Kennedy's began American involvement withVietnam. He's getting involved because he received
conflict advice from Vietnam. South Vietnam had a war about the Geneva Accord into Communist North Vietnam but not south. Kennedy's goal is to
containing communism so he supported South Vietnam and expand the military. And then American war in Vietnam was over because North Vietnam
captured the capital city of Saigon. Now one of Kennedy's important foreign policy...show more content...
John F. Kennedy provided health insurance for poor people based on "John F. Kennedy on health care". Also, Kennedy's attempt to create retirement
base Medicare. He's providing health insurance for elderly by let them use social security benefits. Beside health care Kennedy's had Addison disease
which can cause him to gain more weight or some illness. But there's a new drug called cortisone that can help with Addison disease. Kennedy's used
the drug and it's like a "miracle drug" which can change your whole life. Cortisone made Kennedy's have normal weight from that time

1960's Foreign Policy Essay
The second video I watched and that I'm writing my second report on is U.S Foreign Policy during the 1960's. Foreign Policy is defined as
"Programs and policy that determine America's relation with other nations and foreign entities." Trade agreements like NAFTA, National Security,
and embassies all relate to U.S Foreign Policies. Policies that makes or breaks an alliance is Material/Strategic relations, in other words if two
countries have a lot of the same thing like soldiers or bombs those two countries might want to become allies.
Domestic Policies show how policies strike home for example when the US joined the Vietnam War it was not only fought over seas but it was also
fought here in America between citizens and government.
Another big part was International Status this shows the international ranking of why would you want to be another countries friend. In the 1960's the
top two biggest and baddest countries was the United States and the Soviet Union, this being said you'd think that they would be allies, but in fact they
hated each other. This is because the USSR was communist and the US was capitalist this...show more content...
The USSR is evidence of this because in 1966 they joined the North Vietnamese because they were communist as well and they both hated America.
A major role in 1960's Foreign Policies was propaganda. Propaganda was used most used in the 60's than any other decade, mainly because in order to
do anything you need the support of the citizens. In order to get support from the citizens was to lie a little bit, United States made propaganda about
the Soviet union as did the Soviet Union used propaganda about the United States. Governments used propaganda to plant a seed of hate in the citizens,
because if the citizens can hate the same country that the government does then the government can do whatever they may

National Security in Foreign Policy
Foreign policy definition: a set of political goals that aims to outline how a particular state will interact with others
Beach (2012): Foreign policy actions can be undertaken using a variety of different instruments, ranging from adopting declarations, making speeches,
negotiating treaties, giving other states economic aid, engaging in diplomatic activity such as summits, and the use of military force
No matter which instruments are used, the primary objective of states in outlining their foreign policies is to maximise their national security.
States can go about maximising national security through different means such as by military force, economic prosperity and/or the general welfare of
its people.
Difficult to analyse to what extent national security is a primary objective of states – theories of IR will help explain states' motives and how they go
about maximising state security, if it is their prime objective at all.
This essay will analyse the concept of national security through realism (focused on military power), liberalism (focused on cooperation through liberal
internationalism) and constructivism (focused on wider definitions of security, such as health and the environment).
A.Realism
1.Core principles of realist view of national security
For realists, the concept of national security is an effective balancing of external threats.
The realist tradition of IR theory is said to have stemmed from the work of Thomas Hobbes, where he

Essay about President Bush And Us Foreign Policy
The United States election in 2000 raised a debate between democrat and republican and in the end the American people chose a new leader Mr.
George w. Bush. President Bush clearly defined foreign policy objectives and goals. I have seen and hear our dear President Bush foreign policy after
September 11. Following this, Bush has established its top priorities in foreign policy. He claims that an acts in the government to improve the
international community through negotiation and cooperation. Likewise President Bush remark "It is to inspire and be inspired by other nations to
work together toward a peaceful and prosperous future" (BBC News). Bush, as well as our society, feels the president should be strong– especially in
international...show more content...
Bush, as well as our society, feels the president should be strong– especially in international politics and policies. When the United States was attacked
September 11, 2001, the people looked to the president to lead, and in essence, seek revenge. On both of these levels of domestic considerations, we
will never know to exactly what extent they influence the president's choice of action, but they help us in understanding some of the foreign policy
decisions. Going beyond the individual to the expectations of the position, the role consideration plays an influential domestic part in the response to an
external event and ultimately foreign policymaking. Furthermore to do this, Bush's administration has outlined some specific objectives. Allies are
crucial to conduct foreign operations, so the Bush has joined several international organizations that allow it to serve at the forefront of international
policy. Some of the more famous ones are the United Nations, which is the biggest organization and has many sub–level organizations, the World Trade
Organization, the World Health Organization, the International Monetary Fund, and the World Bank Group (Directory of Economic, Commodity and
Developmental Organizations). Knowing that United States is involved in these international organizations President Bush refuses to listen to UN
(United Nation) and

An Example Of Foreign Policy In The United States
Foreign policy is how one nation deals with many other nations. The book talks about Ronald Regan trying to create foreign policy and then here
you have congress like a bunch of ants floating on a log down river each ant thinking there in charge. Foreign policy from the way "How Congress
Works'" says is set up by the president and not really. Having congress get involved makes foreign policy way more complicated then needed. Harry
Truman was one man who was asked a question. A random person wanted to know who created foreign policy? His answer was that he did. Now this
leads to a important example of foreign policy. This leads toJohn F. Kennedy and we all know what major foreign policy deal he had to deal with. It
was the Cuban missile crisis.

US Foreign Policy Essay
US Foreign policy is what the United States of America does in foreign
countries. This may include setting new rules or even controlling the countries' governments.
What the US does in other countries usually ends up creating a conflict or an uprising in the
region. US foreign policy makes the world very unstable and it causes disagreements between
countries. The Israel Lobby has a great deal of negative influence on US foreign policy. The
US is also very keen to destroy Wahabbist ideas and to exploit countries' resources.
The Israel Lobby causes a lot of instability and unbalanced power
between countries in the Middle East. The Israel Lobby is the term used to describe the group...show more content...
AIPAC pressured congresswomen Betty
McCollum when she decided not to agree on a law passed to support Israel. They used press
and the media to make her accept this law so they could get what they wanted for Israel. Israel
is stopping nationalism in the Middle East so it can get control of the oil reserves. The US
supports this fully since they're going to take their share of the oil. This is another example of
how the Israel Lobby influences what the US does in other countries. The Israel Lobby has a

a lot influence on the US and the US foreign policy in the Middle East is based on Israel's
interest. These interests are achieved by violence and wars and this is how the US foreign
policy creates conflict in the Middle East.
The US has the goal to eliminate Wahhabist ideas which cause the
Wahhabists to fight even more for their religion and ideas, causing conflict in the area.
Wahhabism is a conservative form ofIslam which is practiced in Saudi Arabia. Wahhabists
believe in the unity of God and they follow the Sharia law. The Wahhabist ideology was
spread to Afghanistan and Pakistan where this group of people called the Talibans started to
follow the Wahhabist ideas. The US considered the Talibans to be terrorists and they wanted
to destroy them. US tried many things to stop the

Foreign Policy Essay
Policemen of the World Thesis and Outline
Janene Bull
Professor Joel A. Goldstein
Contemporary US History
2/22/2015
The evolution of U.S. Foreign policy following the Civil War is continually evolving. During the Civil War years, America had an economy that was
based on agriculture. Farmers were growing cotton, tobacco and sugarcane. Slaves from Africa worked on these enormous plantations. . At the time,
America was in an election year with Lincoln as the candidate of the Republican Party claiming he was going to abolish slavery. When Lincoln won
the election he did just that, immediately there after 7 states declared their independence from the US, they were then known as Confederate States.
After a few years 4 more states...show more content...
References www.historyboss.com www.foreignpolicy.com www.huffingtonpost.com Results:100% Unique Content continually evolving. During the
Civil War years, America had
Good
on agriculture. Farmers were growing cotton, tobacco and
Good
and sugarcane. Slaves from Africa worked on these enormous
Good
enormous plantations. . At the time, America was in an election
Good
abolish slavery. When Lincoln won the election he did just
Good

did just that, immediately there after 7 states declared
Good
independence from the US, they were then known as Confederate States.
Good
Confederate States. After a few years 4 more states also joined
Good
international relations. During the past 5 years there have been
Good
the Civil War. For example, Issues Regarding Guantanamo
Good
Amendment of 1901), and the attempt to Stop the Soviet Expansion
Good
policing roll, and has acted as an enforcer of global rules.
Good
global rules. When there is a threat to world peace the
Good
world peace the U.S will respond. Three instances where America
Good
Industrial Revolution, the Treaty of Paris and, The Cold War.
Good
Military Justice, and the four Geneva Conventions. The driving
Good
Geneva Conventions. The driving forces involved in stopping

Good
How the Plagiarism Check Tool Works:
The article you

Free Essay: Foreign Policy
ESSAY: FOREIGN POLICY
Introduction
Washington and Monroe believed the United States should not become involved in European affairs, but is that possible to follow today? In my
opinion, I believe that European affairs can be avoided for the most part, but with major wars, it can't be avoided. When there is a major battle in Europe
, there is a danger to the United States. If we don't work to stop the European threat before it gets to our country, we can be facing major devastation,
destruction, and death. One not–so–recent example of this is World War II. If the United States hadn't joined the Second World War, then Germany
would've eventually invaded our country and would've been harder to stop than it already was. Because of the Japanese attacks on Pearl Harbor,
December 7th 1941, we joined on the side of the British against the Japanese, Germans, and Italians, or the Axis powers. With minor terrorist attacks
and other minor European crimes, we can stay out of their business and for the most part remain neutral in the conflicts on European nations. We need
to protect ourselves and our allies if we wish to keep our freedoms that other countries don't have. It's up to our president to decide what we need to
interfere with, and what we need to stay out of.
I....show more content...
If we as a nation remain neutral in major conflicts in Europe, than we will be endangering ourselves, and our children to come. One example of
why we must become involved with some European affairs is the terror attacks in Paris in November of 2015. It was the bloodiest attack in Europe
for years. French president Hollande called it an "act of war" by the terrorist group ISIS. On the night of November 13, 130 people were massacred
by bombings and shootings. If that escalated to a full war with the ISIS, then the United States would be in danger of the same terror attacks on major
cities like New York, Los Angeles, Chicago, or Washington D.

United States Foreign Policy
The United States foreign or defense policy rests on the US relations with other actors outside the US. This is unlike the other areas of government
policy that greatly deal with internal issues. As described by Patterson (2013) "the cornerstone of foreign policy is the national interest" (p. 435). The
policy that defines the way in which the US interacts with foreign nations. It defines what is best for the nations with respect to protecting its ways and
its physical security. It even sets standards of interaction and dealings for its nationals, both citizens and organizations with foreign nations. One of the
identified foreign policies pursued by the United State government is the national interest to maintain a strong position in the global

Us Foreign Policy In The 21st Century Essay
During the course of this paper we will examine whether or not U.S. foreign policy in the 21st century has either, fundamentally changed, or if the
U.S. is using the same policies it has been using for centuries. First we will discover that much is new in the realm of U.S. foreign policy and lastly
we will explore the aspect of globalization. Next we will examine the new approaches the U.S. has used in the 21st century to address the new issues
on foreign policy and how they have greatly changed, from President Bush's focuses on the use of unilateralism and primacy to President Obama's
separation from Bush's policies and embracing the use of multilateralism and 'smart' power. Finally, while we examine a few resolute aspects of the
current global stage we can then come to the conclusion that while much is new on the world stage in the 21st century, some aspects of the current
foreign policies have remained the same, and will probably stay that way in the future.
New Actors in the Global Arena
The number of actors who contribute to foreign policy making is increasing in the global arena and for US foreign policy. The newest actor to be
considered is the people. Public opinion plays a key role in influencing foreign policy. In this day and age, almost everyone in the world has access to
technology which...show more content...
Foreign policy in big government nations is based on the considering of national security, geopolitics, government administrative and bureaucratic
infighting, and defense of allied nations. Foreign policy in a free nation is based on personal values, personal beliefs, personal self–interest, peaceful
settlement of disputes, and a significant degree of insularity and isolation from the big government nations of the

Regionalization Introduction An international region can be defined as a number of states linked by a geographic relationship and by a degree of
interdependence. The activities of the neighboring states have a significant impact on determining foreign policy. Regionalization is helping reshape
the world in a profound way since many countries today are seeking stronger economic ties with their regional neighbors. Regional subsystems are
characterized by clusters of states coexisting in geographical closeness as interrelated units that sustain significant security, economic, and political
relations. Regionalization can be conceived as the growth of societal integration within a given region, including the undirected processes of social and
economic interaction among the units. Similarly, the term regionalism refers to the proneness of the governments and peoples of two or more states to
establish voluntary associations and to pool together resources in order to create common functional and institutional arrangements. Furthermore,
regionalism can be best described as a process occurring in a given geographical region by which different types of actors (states, regional institutions,
societal organizations and other nonstate actors) come to share certain fundamental values and norms. Regionalization and regionalism find expression
in the economic and security domains, including convergent motivations toward both political/security and economic forms of integration. India

The Purpose Of Foreign Policy
In his 1992 book Writing Security, David Campbell writes that foreign policy is subjective and includes a description of dangers posed by others.
Those that create foreign policy choose aspects of reality and describe them as threats to the state and society. He says that the purpose of national
security strategy is primarily to define and support the state and national identity, which is created by marking borders between "us" and "the other".
Interpreting specific factors and groups in terms of threat reinforces citizens' feelings of identity, belonging, and solidarity.
In Campbell's view, U.S. Vietnam veterans were made "other", by politicians and society. The image that showed them as drug abusers enabled them to
be identified as potential

World War I Foreign Policy Essay

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Featured

Featured (20)

World War I Foreign Policy Essay