2.
• Introduc*on
of
de
stroomversnelling
• Why
was
de
Stroomversnelling
developed
• Before
de
Stroomversnelling
• How
it
evolved
• What
is
new
• What
is
currently
happening
in
rela*on
to
housing
associa*ons
&
private
house
owners
• What
is
s*ll
needed
to
accelerate
upscaling
CONTENTS
www.westonpain*ngcontractors.co.uk
3. The
introduc*on
to
A
Dutch
retrofiCng
programme
for
row
housing
stroomversnelling
huur
5.
• a
Dutch
deal
to
accelerate
deep
retrofiCng
by
4
contractors
and
6
housing
associa*ons
• part
of
Energiesprong,
an
innova*on
programme
commissioned
by
the
Dutch
Ministry
of
the
Interior
• signed
on
the
20th
of
June
2013
• to
convert
11.000
houses
to
Net
Zero
Energy
Buildings
6. GOALS
• 10
year
warranty
on
energy
performance
• retrofit
within
a
week
• costs
of
living
remain
the
same
for
occupant
• aUrac*ve
for
occupants
18. pilot 2.1 Nieuw Buinen
source:
hUps://m.youtube.com/watch?v=I3WBT2eAArI
19.
Challenge
1
-‐
a
20%
reduc*on
of
CO2
emissions
and
14%
renewable
energy
genera*on
in
2020.
An
enormous
challenge
Challenge
2
-‐
more
commercial
ini*a*ves,
a
reduc*on
of
government
and
reduc*on
of
governmental
spending.
How
to
combine
these
two
challenges?
The
ingredients
are:
leave
more
to
the
market,
coopera*on
between
companies
&
knowledge
ins*tutes
and
a
green
deal
with
partners.
WHY
www.unitedisaan.com
20.
Pilot
projects
as:
• To
proof
new
technology
concepts
• To
test
and
present
a
renova*on
concept
• For
dissemina*on
purposes
BEFORE - one off pilot dwellings
Onshuisverdienthet.nl
21.
• Step
from
building
to
area
• Focus
on
retrofiCng,
new
build
and
replacement
of
buildings
• Real
change
within
2
years.
• For
this
GEN
(Gebieden
Energie
Neutraal)
was
ini*ated.
e.g.
Valkenburg
&
Kerschoten
BEFORE – area’s
22.
• Knowledge
development
vs
realisa*on
• Development
of
different
themes
(micro,
macro,
finance,
business
models
&
area
management)
vs
integral
approach
• Lowest
housing
costs
vs
client
oriented
approach
• Proven
technology
vs
technology
of
the
future
• Top-‐down
vs
boUom-‐up
ini*a*ves
BEFORE – area’s – some dilemma’s
23.
• Short
term
results
needed
• Ten
leading
companies:
Alliander,
BAM,
Cofely
GDF
Suez,
Eneco,
Eversheds
Faasen,
KPMG,
Rabobank,
Royal
Haskoning
DHV,
TNO,
United
Energy
Works.
• Companies
wan*ng
change
within
2
years.
• Forma*on
of
GEN
(Gebieden
Energie
Neutraal).
e.g.
Valkenburg
&
Kerschoten
BEFORE – pilot projects for row housing
24.
• Short
term
results
needed
• Ten
leading
companies:
Alliander,
BAM,
Cofely
GDF
Suez,
Eneco,
Eversheds
Faasen,
KPMG,
Rabobank,
Royal
Haskoning
DHV,
TNO,
United
Energy
Works.
• Companies
wan*ng
change
within
2
years.
• Forma*on
of
GEN
(Gebieden
Energie
Neutraal).
e.g.
Valkenburg
&
Kerschoten
BEFORE – LALOG
32.
• Directed
at
upscaling
• Involving
all
stakeholders
• Flexible
• Step
change
innova*on
• Not
only
technical
innova*on
but
also
system
innova*on
e.g.
energy
performance
fee
• New
roles
&
responsibili*es
for
stakeholders
New about the
programme
Blog.gemalto.com
39. Construction period
Row houses
Percentage of total
number (%)
1946 - 1964
480,000
7
1965 – 1974
606,000
9
1975 - 1991
879,000
12.9
Total
1,965,000
29
TO
CREATE
IMPACT
• The
average
energy
consump*on
per
dwelling
in
the
Netherlands
in
1440
m3
natural
gas
and
3440
kWh
of
electricity
(Nibud,
2015).
53
GJ
per
dwelling.
• RetrofiCng
10
%
of
housing
stock
to
nZEB
in
10
years
(19,650
a
year)
will
represent
a
saving
of
1.04
PJ
of
fossil
energy
a
year.
40.
hUps://www.youtube.com/watch?
v=pAAQBmsGmDE&list=PLxqrMoxgE53ndDAFqpEb9h9tbLuB3MD7c&index=2
One off pilot
projects
www.unitedisaan.com
41.
www.unitedisaan.com
42. Thank
you
for
your
kind
aUen*on
m.a.r.oostra@pl.hanze.nl
Ques*ons?