EC Portfolio Workshop Introduction
•Download as PPTX, PDF•
0 likes•453 views
Introduction slides by Lee Allison, AZGS, at the EarthCube Portfolio Workshop
Recommended
Recommended
More Related Content
What's hot
What's hot (6)
Similar to EC Portfolio Workshop Introduction
Similar to EC Portfolio Workshop Introduction (20)
More from EarthCube
More from EarthCube (20)
Recently uploaded
Recently uploaded (20)
EC Portfolio Workshop Introduction
- 1. EARTHCUBE COMMUNITY EarthCube Portfolio Workshop Boulder CO February 12-14, 2014
- 2. WORKSHOP GOALS Seek guidance on a community-based plan to further cyberinfrastructure in the geosciences Assess needs, visions, opportunities, and challenges of the EarthCube builders for system architecture Identify ways the EarthCube Commons can support this community
- 3. EARTHCUBE TEST ENTERPRISE GOVERNANCE An agile approach to design a system that catalyzes the field and works for the community How do we link your tools, standards, and skills to create EarthCube?
- 4. Organizational timeline – Year 1 Stakeholders (Assembly) – governance ideas, testing Integrate stakeholder concepts crowdsource Synthesize and recommend to NSF Demo phase Governance charter Governance timeline – Year 2 Establish Organizational Demo Facilitate convergence on system design, data standards Evaluate results: basis for long term organization NSF solicitation?
- 5. WHAT IS EARTHCUBE “GOVERNANCE?” Resistance is futile! Not imposition of unwanted command and control
- 6. EarthCube governance is a blank canvas We are looking to you to paint the future
- 8. Providing a „backbone‟ to help build community Governance is finding solutions to specific problems, fostering trust, reconciling interests, and coordinating communities.
- 9. INITIAL COMMUNITY FUNCTIONS 1. Identify and Implement Vision, Mission, and Goals 2. Engage and Coordinate Across Community 3. Create and Implement By-Laws and Charter 4. Facilitate Agreement on and Maintain Viable Architecture and Concept of Operations that Enable Realization of Goals and Objectives of EarthCube Vision
- 10. STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT (YEAR 1): EARTHCUBE ASSEMBLY Industry & FOSS: Instrumentation, Software, and Technology Developers EarthCube Awards Research Science Communities End-User Communities & Workshop Participants Data Facilities & Users IT/CS/ Information Scientists Professional Societies Assembly Advisory Council
- 11. STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT (YEAR 1): EARTHCUBE ASSEMBLY Industry & FOSS: Instrumentation, Software, and Technology Developers EarthCube Awards Research Science Communities End-User Communities & Workshop Participants Assembly Advisory Council Data Facilities & Users IT/CS/ Information Scientists Professional Societies . . .
- 12. STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT (YEAR 1): CROWDSOURCING
- 14. EARTHCUBE.ORG The “Informational Site” Portal Earthcube.org The “Workspace” The Workspace
- 15. Big Data Digital Government Big Earth Data Initiative Open Data Access CIF21
- 17. A CALL FOR YOUR INVOLVEMENT • Upcoming community workshops: Jan – March 2014 • All Hands Meeting, June 24-26, 2014, Washington, DC • Crowdsourcing: • Strategic Pathways exercises • Input & feedback on community models • Social Media – Twitter, Facebook • www.earthcube.org
Editor's Notes
- Agile – several advisory committee & a development evaluation team – allow us to quickly change course if things aren’t working or we’re not getting the results we want.
- Governance functions based on published governance research and community input. Specific sources include: Over 75 published research on governanceEarthCube Working Group and Concept Team draft roadmapsCommunity input during Governance Steering Committee virtual webinars – more than 30 webinarsJune charrette, July 2012 EarthCube Principle Investigator workshop, EarthCube sessions at the ESIP Federation Mid-Year Meeting in Madison, WI, July 17-20. #4 refers to the governance and organizational architecture and not any specific CI
- What about agencies, intl, other science communities?
- What about agencies, intl, other science communities?
- Need feedback from broad cross-section of geoscientists on their ideas on EarthCube governance, and test how they would react to different externalities (NSF funding, support from university/employer, etc.) through game theory.