Sacco And Vanzetti Case Analysis

Sacco And Vanzetti Case Analysis
Two innocent Italian men, speaking out against an all white Jury, were blamed for the murder of two white men which resulted in death by the electric
chair. Although no hard evidence was held against them, these men were charged because the trial occurred during a time when the Red Scare had
made a huge influence on the way people viewed non–americans. These two men were named Sacco and Vanzettiand they were believed to be
anarchists due to their ethnicity which brought about an unjust trial which, in return, sparked a fire within the United States. The Sacco and Vanzetti
case brought to the surface the problems dealing with discrimination against immigrants because their trial was believed to be unjust; therefore, we now
have laws abolishing the injustice and discrimination towards immigrants.
Sacco and Vanzetti were two Italian immigrants who were believed to be anarchists all because they were immigrants. These two men were disciples of
a militant anarchist named Luigi Galleani whose intended target was Attorney General A. Mitchell Palmer. Galleanists, disciples of Galleani, sent thirty
mail bombs all across the United States. The intended targets for these mail bombs were high profile public figures such as judges and attorney
general's (Jazz Age...show more content...
This was surfaced because their trial was believed to be unjust; therefore, we created laws that eliminate discrimination towards immigrants. Sacco and
Vanzetti were believed to be anarchists all because they did not favor the government. This led to the men becoming victims of a murder trial which
resulted in their deaths. This trial caused protests and bombs to occur across America because the people believed that Sacco and Vanzetti were indeed,
innocent. This case was brought up 50 years later and the trial ended up being named unjust and that Sacco and Vanzetti were wrongfully
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

Sacco & Vanzetti: The Men, the Murders, and the Judgment of Mankind by Bruce Watson takes a look at history and tries to give us all of the details
of what happened in this case. Nicola Sacco and Bartolomeo were Italian immigrants that stood trial and were executed for robbery and murder, despite
the fact that many did not believe they were guilty.
They were most famously known as the "good shoemaker and poor fish peddler," which made it hard for Americans to believe that they could of done
it. Bruce Watson tried to clarify and bring light to what happened back when the fateful two were arrested.
Someone tried to send bombs to important officials in various offices throughout the United States, through the Postal Service. It was because of

Sacco And Vanzetti Case
The roaring twenties were a fun decade for america a rebirth after world war one and celebration of a growing and thriving country. It was not all
celebration however, there was a dark and prejudiced side of America during this time which was especially dark for the infamous pair Nicola Sacco
and Bartolomeo Vanzetti. After a string of burglaries and then a double homicide took place involving two Italian men near Sacco and Vanzetti around
Charlestown Massachusetts stakes were high for the recover the criminals. Unfortunately after 20 days of searching the pair came in contact with a car
linked to the crime and fitting the description as two Italian men they were arrested on May 5th 1920 (Stark) . Both men were not only foreign
immigrants but...show more content...
Lots of newspaper printed their antiradical opinion and dirtied Sacco and Vanzetti's names and published about how they dodged the military
draft, and how they both were carrying guns during the time of their arrest. The Department of Justice even released propaganda to excite and
unify the public against radicals (Russell). Already the case was being judged in advance by the people who did not even know the evidence. Judge
Thayer told the jurors to have confidence and most interpreted that as to not be afraid and have the courage to convict the men (2). The trial lasted
35 days and as Sacco and Vanzetti were tried they were put in shackles and questioned in a steel cage in the courtroom (a somewhat common practice
in Massachusetts), however this being treated as criminals gave a bad first impression and worsened the juror preconceived bias' against them
(Streissguth). Though the American opinion was somewhat sway during the trial, most including the jurors joined the bandwagon of hating foreign
radicals which further stacked the odds against the innocent pair. For this particular case there around 180 witnesses to testify but there was an acute
disagreement for almost every key witnesses' testimony (Stark). For example while one witness saw Sacco caning fish across town, another witness
saw him at a restaurant with Vanzetti while another saw him at the scene of the crime (Sacco and Vanzetti Trial). There was confusion about how they
got away as well, though the prosecution determined they did not drive a getaway car witnesses testified see Vanzetti driving away. Several witnesses
could not identify Vanzetti when he was only 10 feet away from them but one woman gave a thorough and perfect description after seeing him for one
second out of a two story window (2). Another woman

The 1920's was a time when many immigrants from Europe came to the United States for new opportunities. It estimated around 13 million immigrants
entered the United States. Out of those 13 million immigrants, most came from Southern and Eastern Europe. The effect of World War I left many
Americans despised the idea of new people coming to their country. This was called the Red Scare, were many Americans believed that these
immigrants were bringing ideas towards anarchism and cause a revolution. The dislikement and discrimination towards immigrants affected them and
can be seen in Nicola Sacco's and Bartolomeo Vanzetti's case
The men tied to this case were Nicola Sacco and Bartolomeo Vanzetti.Sacco and Vanzettihad both immigrated from Italy...show more content...
The victims were Frederick Parmenter and Alessandro Berardelli, a paymaster and his security guard. The two men were working on a shoe factory
called Slater and Morrill, and were handling two boxes containing about $15,000. Two men later entered the factory and shot and killed Parmenter and
Berardelli and fled with the money. According to the article "The Case of Sacco and Vanzetti" by Felix Frankfurter, witnesses claimed "As the murder
was being committed, a car containing several other men drew up to the spot–and were driven away at high speed across some nearby railroad tracks."
The car involved in the crime was shortly found in woods near the town of Cochesett. At the time, the investigators believed that the crime was
related to a gang and were notified by witnesses that the men appeared to be Italian. Police found similar car tracks in Ruth Johnson's garage were
there was a car in repair and believed that anyone who fetches the car is a suspect. The police had also advised the Johnson's to call them if anyone
tries to claim the car. A couple of days later a man by the name of Mike Boda went to go claim the car, but fled before the police arrived. The
Johnson's noted that there were two other men who accompanied Boda, but left towards the direction where the town of Brockton was located, which
happened to be a different direction from where Boda had gone and

Nicola Sacco And Bartolomeo Vanzetti Analysis
Hi Siera, I agree with your examination of the paintings of Philip Evergood and Ben Shahn depicting the struggle of workers in the 1930's. In the
1930's work was scarce and those that were employed faced poor working conditions and low pay. Evergood's American Tragedy, depicted the protest
that occurred outside the Republic Steel mill in Chicago in 1937. This protest turned violent when police opened fire into the unarmed crowd killing
ten and injuring one hundred. Shahn's The Passion of Sacco and Vanzetti shows the bodies of two Italian immigrants, Nicola Sacco and Bartolomeo
Vanzetti. These men were convicted of robbery andmurder of a paymaster and guard in Massachusetts in 1920. The men were convicted based on their
ethnicity with

Scapegoats: Nicola Sacco And Bartolomeo Vanzetti
Scapegoats are a recurring theme throughout stories and literature in all different cultures. The concept of scapegoats first appears in the Book of
Leviticus, where a goat is left in a desert far away from society taking the sins of the community with it. In more recent works, a scapegoat is
someone who has been blamed for wrongdoings or mistakes. In society and in literature, people in power scapegoat those with less power as a way to
blame problems on one specific person or group. Usually, the person being blamed is not at fault for what they're being accused of, however, the
person or group scapegoating has chosen them because they are an easy target. The use of scapegoats has been around since the beginning of humanity
and although it...show more content...
A notable incident of scapegoating from the U.S. is the Sacco and Vanzetti trials in the 1920s. In 1920, two men were killed in Boston and the
suspects were described as Italian men. Nicola Sacco and Bartolomeo Vanzetti, both Italian anarchists, were accused of the murders and sentenced
to death. Although there was little evidence against these two men, during the time period there was a stigma surrounding Italians in Boston, and
also a negative view of anarchists. Soon before the men were to be killed, another man and his gang confessed to the killings, however, the judge
dismissed these confessions and kept the verdict. This case drew worldwide recognition and sparked protests throughout cities across the world.
The two men were eventually killed on August 23, 1927. However, before the killing, Vanzetti spoke to the judge of the trial, and the speech was
later published into a short story titled, "This is Our Triumph." Vanzetti spoke, "We have proved that there could not have been another judge on
the face of this earth more prejudiced and more cruel than you(the presiding judge) have been against us... Before you see us you already know
that we were radicals, that we were underdogs, that we were the enemy of this institution" (Landau). This court decision scapegoated Sacco and
Vanzetti because they were easy targets and people disliked their political views. However, Vanzetti revealed the flaws in the system, saying that he
was targeted because he had radical views and even before the evidence was shown, he was an underdog. After Vanzetti gave this speech people
began to realize he was completely innocent, but the city of Boston used him as a scapegoat for the murders because he was easy to blame. This
reveals the flaws, both in the criminal justice system and the prejudice many societies have against a group of

Sacco And Bartolomeo Vanzetti Essay
The Sacco and Vanzetti Murder Trial
The murder trial of the Italians known as Nicola Sacco and Bartolomeo Vanzetti was one of the most controversial events during the 1920's. The
execution of the Italians by electric chair was wrongfully convicted given that there wasn't enough evidence to prove that Sacco and Vanzettiwere
responsible for the armed robbery. In fact, many commentators say that they were executed mainly for their political views and not for their "so
called" actions. In my opinion, the trial was never properly handled and they should have never been executed or at least not given a real chance to
defend themselves.
On april 15, 1920 an armed robbery took place in South Braintree, Massachusetts. Two businessmen were moving a $15,000 payroll to different
location when an automobile with two men inside showed up, shot them both and drove away. This is where it all starts, Nicola Sacco and Bartolomeo
Vanzetti are blamed for acrime they were never a part of. I believe the police department assumed they were guilty for two major reasons. 1) Mr.
Sacco owned a gun of the same type that was used in the crime scene back in...show more content...
Regardless of knowing very little english, they were big time anarchist who disliked the government and the idea of World War I. They even fled to
Mexico to avoid military conscription. When they later returned to the United States, Nicola became a shoe maker in a factory and Vanzetti became
a fish vendor. When they were arrested, police officers had even more reason to suspect that they were criminals who liked to get away with their
crimes. At this time, Sacco and Vanzetti were interrogated and pressured to confess a crime they had nothing to do with. The big disadvantage of
knowing very little english put them in a bad position and they were about to face one of the biggest murder trials of the

Sacco And Vanzetti Case Study
The case of Sacco and Vanzetti sparked a national outcry for justice as well as a national debate over American values. Two Italian immigrants, shoe
operative Nicola Sacco and fish peddler Bartolomeo Vanzetti, were falsely accused robbing Braintree's Slater and Morrill Shoe Company and
murdering two of the factory's workers (After the Fact 256). At the time of the Braintree holdup, the police were investigating a similar crime in
Bridgewater. In both cases a gang was involved, and the suspects escaped in a car. Eyewitnesses believed the criminals to be Italians. So, whenSacco
and Vanzettiappeared at a parking garage near Braintree and drove off in a car police suspected was getaway vehicle in both crimes, Sacco and
Vanzetti were arrested...show more content...
Felix Frankfurter, one of the most prominent and respected critics of the trial, described the document denying Sacco and Vanzetti's appeal to the
Supreme Court as "a farrago of misquotations, misrepresentations, suppressions, and mutilations". The Boston Herald even criticized Judge Thayer for
acting more like an advocate than an arbiter (After the Fact 280). The multifaceted conflict between prosecution and defense is why the Sacco and
Vanzetti case drew national attention––people were not only fighting over guilt or innocence but what it meant to be American. This case forced
people to question the principles of freedom and equality that define the United States and how these principles apply to Sacco and

Sacco Vs Vanzetti
Upon his death sentence, Bartolomeo Vanzetti said, "I wish to tell you that I am an innocent man. I never committed any crime but sometimes some
sin. I wish to forgive some people for what they are now doing to me." On August 23, 1927, two innocent men were executed by electrocution in
Boston. Those two men were Sacco and Vanzetti, who were treated unjustly for prejudiced reasons. Both men supported anarchist groups that promoted
warfare against the government. Sacco and Vanzetti received an unfair trial because of their radical political views, tainted witnesses in court, and
denial of a new trial.
Nicola Sacco was born in Torremaggiore, Italy, in 1891. Sacco was sixteen when he moved to the United States. When he immigrated, he worked
whatever...show more content...
While the police were looking for evidence to use against Sacco they found a cap and claimed that it was his. He denied owning the cap, and so they
had him try it on infront of the jury. He repeatedly said the cap did not fit (Linder). As the court was trying to find evidence against Vincetti they could
not come up with anything stable. So, in front of the court he said this, "Eugene Debs say that not even a dog –– something like that –– not even a dog
that kill the chickens would have been found guilty by American jury with the evidence that Commonwealth have produced against us. I say that not
even a leprous dog would have his appeal refused two times by the Supreme Court of Massachusetts –– not even a leprous dog" ("Sacco and Vanzetti
Case"). Although some say the trial was fair there are still a lot of people who believe it was not. Three months after the executions of Sacco and
Vanzetti the state of Massachusetts passed a law stating, "in any case in which a defendant has been convicted of murder in the first degree, the
Supreme Judicial Court must review both the law and the evidence" ("Sacco & Vanzetti: Justice"). Also, in 1977 Massachusetts Governor Michael
Dukakis issued a proclamation claiming that Sacco and Vanzetti had been treated unjustly. Furthermore the case is still debated a lot today because it is
a perfect example of domination over the

Ben Shahn's The Passion Of Sacco And Vanzetti
Ben Shahn's painting The Passion of Sacco and Vanzetti highlights the discrimination immigrant groups, as outsiders, face in many aspects of the
American experience, particularly that before the justice system. Shahn effectively argues that the American systems, as a result of prejudice and
hostility towards immigrants, can be incredibly unjust and abusive. He does so through his specific use of colors, the symbolism of the figures he
chose to use, and the framing of his painting. The Passion of Sacco and Vanzetti is made with tempera and gouache on canvas mounted on
composition board. It was painted by social realist Ben Shahn in the years of 1931 and 1932 as a criticism of the infamous American Sacco and
Vanzetti case...show more content...
Apparently, it took the judge, who stands at the window of the courthouse, hypocritically holding up his right hand in a sign of honesty, three hours to
deem guilty the accused. "Honorable they may have been, but when facing what they view as a crisis, those in power will generally do what they
deem necessary to protect an established order in which they occupy positions of privilege" (33). It can be seen in the faces of the men that though
they are in honorable positions of power, their ideas about justice and fairness were quickly distorted. Shahn painted the men with bored–looking and
cold faces. Even the smaller details of the painting hold great importance. Frame of the painting and the scale of the figures implies something: the
person viewing the scene depicted in the painting is doing so intimately, from a close range, as if invited to the funeral: the viewer is a bystander like
the three men who convicted Sacco and Vanzetti. For example, even now "the response of many majority Americans has been to support measures that
place large portions of the immigrant populations under suspicion and state surveillance" (35). Shahn is trying to say that everyone, America as a
whole and Americans, watched on as Sacco and Vanzetti were killed and did nothing. Like no one helped

"I wish to tell you I am innocent and never connected with any crime... I wish to forgive some people for what they are now doing to me." These
were the last words of Vanzetti just before his death. Two innocent men executed because of their background information, the location they were in
during a crime and the prejudice trials they had to face trying to prove their innocence. Nicola Sacco was born on June 11, 1888, in Torremaggiore,
Italy while Bartolomeo Vanzetti was born on April 22, 1891, in Villafelletto, Italy (www.workerslibery.org). These two men were both anarchist and
Italian immigrants with no criminal backgrounds. Sacco was a shoe edger and Vanzetti was a construction worker, but during his free time he
peddled eels and clams. They both immigrated to the United States in 1908. Although Vanzetti had a tough childhood and never found a woman,
Sacco was married and had two children. He had a son named Dante and second child, which was a girl, born during his time in jail. On April 15,
1920, two men murdered a pay master and a security guard and stole more than 15,000 dollars from them(bostonlocaltv.org). Several eye witnesses
described the two murders as Italian
Immigrants, while some even claimed that they thought they saw Sacco and Vanzetti. Their car was found in the woods so police put the murders
vehicle in an auto repair shop as a trap to see who would claim the car. Sacco and Vanzetti fell into the trap even though they were not suspects. On
May 5,

Compare And Contrast Sacco And Vanzetti
Sacco and Vanzetti Following the end of World War I, evolution began to take its toll on the nation as a whole. There were different types of
entertainment that began to emerge, at this time. Many different ways of being entertained started to become more prevalent than ever. America has
now established new cultural dominance (Currell 35). With entertainment and many other industries booming with business and success, there was a
tremendous increase in gang activities and gang relations. Along with the increase of gang relations and activities, multiple political ideologies, such as
communism, anarchism, fascism, and socialism was getting even bigger than ever. A specific alliance was the alliance of Nicola Sacco and
Bartolomeo Vanzetti. Neither Sacco nor Vanzetti knew
...show more content...
As the Great Depression neared its end, there was a countless number of different genres of entertainment that came with it. Fiction, poetry, and
drama set the precedent of the entertainment industry. The genres: Fiction, poetry, and drama came with manifold talented young and old artists,
poets, and writers. It was believed by multiple people that these genres would inevitably lead to civilization restoration. (Currell 44). Music and
performances also contributed to the thriving of the entertainment industry. This genre gradually started to become more prevalent than the other
genres. Many forms of music, such as Jazz and Blues, brought about many great artists, during this era. Perry Bradford, a famous Blues singer, sold
over 10,000 copies of his album, "Crazy Blues", in his first week of its release date. In just over 7 months, he was able to promote and sell over 1
million copies of his album. (Currell 75). Within an instance, these new, talented musicians began to form a network of influence for new musical
expressions (Currell 76). Likewise, film and radio began to take its toll on the entertainment business, as well. The Roaring Twenties became the decade

Sacco And Vanzetti Analysis
Sometimes words cannot exactly explain what we want to convey, so we need a visual to support it. A similar thing was observed in the article of
Alan M. Dershowitz, he cleverly makes use of Ben Shah's painting in the article to grab the attention of folks. The author writes about a murder case
of a paymaster and a guard of the South Braintree by Sacco and Vanzetti, both were Italian immigrant anarchists. Surprisingly, the truth was not
revealed that whether Sacco and Vanzetti were the killers and this case is still unsolved. I agree with the author that the trials could not get to the fair
results. I believe that the painting is an ironic symbol of the justice. It silently expresses a lot what the text can't. I think the painting adds words...show
more content...
A hidden symbol for the injustice, very cleverly used by Ben Shahn, was lilies. In an online webpage, Ben Shahn says, "As a well–known symbol of the
crucified Christ, the lilies also suggest that Sacco and Vanzetti are martyrs, punished for sins they did not commit" (Shahn, Ben. The Passion of Sacco
and Vanzetti 1931–32. New York. http://collection.whitney.org/object/1022 Accessed October 2016). It is clear from this line that the two sentenced
people were innocent and were the victims of the power of high–class gentlemen. Former are stated as martyrs because they were not the murderers
instead they had been murdered by the unfair trials held by wealthy

Sacco And Vanzetti Case Essay
The 1920's was a busy time for America. The Roaring Twenties, The Golden Twenties, The Red Scare, and many more eras happened. The Roaring
Twenties was "the era in American history between the end of WW1 and the commencement of the Great Depression" (Alchin). During this time, the
United States prospered– there were new automobiles, fashion styles, and music styles. The Golden Twenties was very similar to the Roaring
Twenties. During the Golden Twenties, there were social and economic reforms, artistic expressions, Berlin's Recovery, and the Women's Liberation
Movement (What). While the Roaring and Golden Twenties was a good outlook for America, the Red Scare was not. The Red Scare "was the name
given to the period of anti–radical hysteria...show more content...
(Log) Many do not believe that Sacco and Vanzettihad a fair trial. The Sacco and Vanzetti trial has a bunch of controversy behind it. The Sacco and
Vanzetti Case has always been treated as one, but in reality, the two should have had an opportunity to serve the trial together and if the two feel
as if justice was not served, then they should have been able to have separate trials. Before being executed, Vanzetti left the courtroom with "In all
my life I have never stole, never killed never spilled blood.... We were tried during a time ... when there was hysteria of resentment and hate against
the people of our principles, against the foreigner.... I am suffering because I am a radical and indeed I am a radical; I have suffered because I was
an Italian and indeed I am an Italian.... If you could execute me two times, and if I could be reborn two other times, I would live again to do what I
have done already" (Danzer 414). This quote shows that Vanzetti is innocent. "Moore did his best to turn Sacco and Vanzetti into archetypal working
men with whom he hoped large segments of the blue–collar community might identify. He even tried to arouse international interest in the case,
especially in Italy. The tactics showed early signs of working. Groups such as the New England Civil Liberties Union soon joined the fight, sending to
its supporters a letter declaring that the evidence against Sacco and Vanzetti was "unsubstantial" and that they were being prosecuted merely because
they were "foreigners and are active and influential radicals." (User) This quote shows how the defense attorney blames the prosecution on their race.
In one article it says "Moore alleged that Proctor testified that he found "Bullet 3" consistent with having been fired from Sacco's Colt despite having
confided earlier to District Attorney Katzmann that he did not believe "Bullet 3" came from the defendant's gun. Judge Thayer

Sacco And Vanzetti And The Red Scare
At the beginning of 1920, America had just witnessed the rise of communism as a result of the first world war. Many affected nations were in
shambles and their citizens looked for refuge within the United States. This tide of immigration carried with it citizens from around the globe who
brought with them their families, their culture, and their approach to foreign policy. America recognized this immigration as a threat and labeled many
immigrants "communists". This event was called the "Red Scare" and much controversy arose as a result. One of the most well–known controversies
of this time was the trial of Sacco and Vanzetti. Sacco and Vanzetti created a split within the nation of minorities and immigrants versus the frightened
and prejudiced homegrown Americans ("Sacco and Vanzetti: Were Nicola Sacco and Bartolomeo Vanzetti Treated Fairly by the American Justice
System?"). As a result, Nicola Sacco and Bartolomeo Vanzetti fell victim to an unfair trial based upon the stigma associated with immigrants at that
time, their unpopular political views, and a biased judge.
On April 15, 1920, the Slater and Morrill Shoe Company in Braintree, Massachusetts, fell victim to an armed robbery. According to Louis Stark's
article "Are Sacco and Vanzetti Really Guilty," "...two men shot and killed a paymaster and his guard carrying $15,700"(Stark 1). According to
witnesses these men were middle–aged Italian immigrants and possessed 32–caliber automatic handguns(1). As eye–witnesses were

Fraud: The Case Of Sacco And Vanzetti
The case of Sacco and Vanzetti, two italian anarchists took place in 1920. They were "falsely" convicted of robbing a paymaster and killing the guard.
They bonded over their ideal of anarchism and used violence to fight against violent and unjust governments. Their case caused extreme tension
between immigrants and American people. Thousands of people around the world were devastated by this case and began to speak up. Although their
innocence was supported by many people, Sacco and Vanzettiwere executed off of deceptive evidence. This increased the amount of hatred Italian
immigrants had against Americans.
Sacco and Vanzetti were both involved in normal workplace. Nicola Sacco was a 32–year–old shoemaker and Bartolomeo Vanzetti was 29–year–old

Sacco And Vanzetti Analysis
The 1920s proved to be hysterical in Braintree, Massachusetts. Nicola Sacco and Bartolomeo Vanzetti were Italian immigrants during a time period that
showed great animosity to foreigners. In the presence of two crimes, one a robbery and assault, the other a holdup and murder, Sacco and Vanzetti were
ultimately executed with minimal evidence to support the allegations against them. In the presence of prejudice, acts of injustice to another are
inevitable. A witness arraigned Vanzetti of committing acrime based on the overgeneralization that all foreigners run the same. The judge adjudicating
the trials disclosed to a friend of a noted humorist about his intentions to have Sacco and Vanzettiexecuted based solely on the fact that they were
...show more content...
Thayer made it known he had a prejudice against the defendants. Both during the trial and throughout the appeal process, Thayer made multiple
inappropriate comments regarding Sacco and Vanzetti. Judge Thayer showed a strong discrimination against foreigners and radicals. Russell Aiuto
addresses Thayer's unsuitable behavior in "Sacco and Vanzetti". Frederick Katzmann, representing the prosecution, made an inappropriate
cross–examination and was fully supported by judge Thayer. Thayer attempted to manipulate thejury by emphasizing their patriotism and loyalty.
Robert Benchly, a noted humorist was told by a friend of Thayer's intentions. " ' A bunch of parlor radicals are trying to get those Italian bastards
off. I'll see them hanged and i'd like to see a few dozen of the radicals, too' ''(Aiuto 6). A group of radicals are trying to have Sacco and Vanzetti be
pleaded innocent. Thayer would like to see the two men hung as well as every other radical. A judge is a primary figure in the criminal justice
system. If an influence such as a judge is corrupt, then the trial is no longer fair and defendant's rights are taken. in this circumstance the end result is
fatal. The simple presence of prejudice induced judge Thayer's actions which proved to be unjust to both Sacco and

The Murder Of Anarchists By Sacco And Vanzetti
In 1919, shortly after the First World War when the Anarchists and Socialists had loudly shouted that they did not support America's fighting the war,
there was a wave of attempted bombings across the USA by Anarchists against local, state and federal officials. Then, in Massachusetts, two pay
officers delivering a payroll to a company were ambushed, murdered in broad daylight, and the money was stolen. Sacco and Vanzetti were known
Anarchists who were vocally unhappy with the USA and happened to look just like these two. As the two said before their execution, they would have
been happy to have been martyred for the cause of ANarchism, but they were most upset because they were being killed for being common robbers,
something Anarchists did

Sacco And Vanzetti Case Analysis

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Featured

Featured (20)

Sacco And Vanzetti Case Analysis