1. Group 4
Amit Prakash (CGT21002)
Dipanjan Sengupta (CGT21005)
Indranil Ghosh (CGT21006)
Mohd. Zinhar Uddin (CGT21010)
Bhargav Sri Dhavala (CGT21027)
2. Individual KRA’s &
respective KPIs are
organized in line with
Functional Manager
and Administrative
Manager.
Defining the
employee’s goal with
organizational goal.
•Enables the
appraisee to identify
the training needs
•Assigning
challenging but doable
goals.
3. WEAKNESS
.
STRENGTHS
• Recent inclusion of 360 degree feedback.
• KRAs aligned with organization’s objective.
• Transparent talent review process.
• Appeal system
• Incentive pay aligned with overall
company’s performance.
• Training program in line with individual’s
competency.
• No self rating system
• Bias present in form of Recency effect, Halo effect
and Mirror Effect
• Rating is done mostly in form of Central Tendency.
• Pointer scale only available from 2-6 (1 is generally
not given).
• Rating mostly depends on Leader Manager
Exchange Theory
