Presentation made by [Edmund Klimek, Charles Forrest and Jay Forrest] at the IFLA Library Buildings & Equipment Satellite Meeting, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, August 10-11 2016
2. CONTEXT
- The U.S. University Library Model
- A History of Partnership
- Needs & Motivations
PLANNING
& SERVICES
- LSC Operations & Facilities
- Planned Services: Ingest & Operations
- Discovery & Electronic Collections
OUTLINE
DESIGN
- Responsiveness to Site
- Process-Driven
- Campus Impact & Future Growth
3. FUTUREPAST
THE UNIVERSITY LIBRARY MODEL
USER-
FOCUSED
MATERIAL-
FOCUSED
PRESERVATION
OF CULTURAL
ARTIFACTS
LIBRARIANS AS
FACILITATORS OF
KNOWLEDGE
INSTITUTIONAL
RESEARCH
& METRICS
RESOURCES
TO VERIFY
AUTHENTICITY
COLLABORATION
OPPORTUNITIES
Storage facility
& preservational
archive
Democratization
of cultural artifacts
& knowledge
Hub at
intersection of
organized knowledge
& interactive
resources
4. 1836
Private University
15,000
Undergraduate: 8,000
Graduate and Professional: 7,000
Business, Law, Medicine,
Nursing, Public Health, Theology
28,000
13,000 University faculty and staff
15,000 Emory Healthcare
Emory Healthcare Hospital and Clinic
1885
Public Institute (STEM focused)
25,000
Undergraduate: 15,100
Graduate: 9,900
Engineering, Architecture, Computing,
Sciences, Liberal Arts, Business
18,000
ESTABLISHED
PUBLIC/PRIVATE
ENROLLMENT
SCHOOLS
FACULTY & STAFF
OTHER
GEORGIA TECHEMORY UNIVERSITY
UNIVERSITY PROFILES
5. $4.6 billion (FY 16)
Emory University: $1.9 billion
Emory Healthcare: $2.7 billion (estimate)
$6.7 billion
$572.4 million
(FY 15)
$1.5 billion (FY 16)
$1.9 billion
$648.2 million
(FY 15)
ANNUAL
OPERATING
BUDGET
ENDOWMENT
TOTAL RESEARCH
FUNDING AWARDS /
TOTAL SPONSORED
FUNDING
GEORGIA TECHEMORY UNIVERSITY
BY THE NUMBERS: FINANCIALS
6. 4 million
1926 Candler Library
1955 Candler renovated
1969 Woodruff Library
1998 Woodruff renovated
2.5 million
Price Gilbert 1953
Crosland Tower 1965
College of Architecture Library
Andrew Carnegie 1906 (now admin. space)
TOTAL VOLUMES
MAIN LIBRARY
GEORGIA TECHEMORY UNIVERSITY
BY THE NUMBERS: LIBRARIES
7. AREAS OF
COMMON INTEREST
- NEUROSCIENCES
- BIOMEDICINE
- CONDITIONED SPACE
FOR LONG-TERM RETENTION
OF LIBRARY PHYSICAL
COLLECTIONS
PRIVATE VS.
PUBLIC LIBERAL ARTS,
MEDICINE & LAW
VS. ENGINEERING
& SCIENCES
STUDENTS
FACULTY
FUNDING
SOURCES
A PROFILE
IN PARTNERING
8. ESTABLISHED PARTNERSHIPS
BETWEEN GEORGIA TECH & EMORY
BME
Biomedical
Engineering
Biomedical
Imaging
Technology
Center
Biomedical
Nanotechnology
Regenerative
Medicine
TI:GER Program
(partnership w/
Law School)
Predictive
Health Institute
Atlanta
Clinical &
Translational
Science Institute
High speed
computing
WHY A SHARED REPOSITORY?
CONVERGENT THEMES
9. 17%
overlap between collections
COMMON INTEREST
in the sciences
LIBRARY COLLABORATIONS
- GALILEO, ASERL, ARCHE, GOLD, GETSM and GETS
- Discussions between the library leaders 2010-2012
(looking at 2CUL as a model)
LIBRARY COLLECTIONS & COLLABORATIONS
10. EMORY
CRITICAL NEED:
SPACE FOR COLLECTIONS
- Collections growing
at 5000 LF per year
- Continued growth of
special collections
GA. TECH
CRITICAL NEED:
BETTER FACILITIES
- Campus library complex
in need of renewal
- Redefining 21st Century
Research Library
WHY A SHARED REPOSITORY? DIVERGENT MOTIVATIONS
11. PLANNING
LIBRARY SERVICE CENTER
STEERING COMMITTEE
- ULs & others
- MOUs
- Design oversight
- Policies for collections
& future services
OPERATIONS
LIBRARY SERVICE CENTER
STEERING COMMITTEE
- ULs & others
- Policies
- Services
- Budget
- Reporting
EMTECH CORPORATION 501(c)(3)
GOVERNANCE & FUNDING
12. SERVICE
OPERATIONS MODEL
- Georgia Tech employees
- Service level agreements
- Operating level
agreements
- Billable services
CAPITAL
EXPENDITURES
- 50/50 for capital
expenditures
EMTECH
- Holds ground lease
- Owns building
GOVERNANCE & FUNDING
14. LIBRARY SERVICE CENTER PROGRAM
Working Groups
Construction
Collections
prep
Systems &
inventory
control
Prospective
collections
Services
PROJECT ORGANIZATION
16. Build & jointly operate a Harvard-style high-density offsite
facility for paper and microfilm retrospective collections
Provide state-of-the-art long-term storage
Expand materials offerings to each institution
Reduce redundancy by establishing joint collections
Free up valuable central campus space
Improve faculty & student access & service through technology
KEY PROJECT OBJECTIVES
17. LIBRARY SERVICE CENTER
One location One collection Optimal
storage
Robust
service
Future
growth
VISION & HIGH-LEVEL OBJECTIVES
19. LSC SERVICES & POLICIES
DETERMINED JOINTLY
SAME SERVICE LEVEL
FOR EACH INSTITUTION
PLANNED INGEST OF
MATERIALS PER INSTITUTION
SCHEDULE
- SLAs, OLAs, MOUs
- Materials housed together
- Workflows designed for efficiency
- Emory: 100 LF/week
- Georgia Tech: 10 LF/week
- One-time projects to be negotiated as needed
- Open M-F
- Schedule determined by Ga. Tech. calendar
WORKING GROUPS: OUTCOMES