2018-2019-AGRAPHICS1-Course-Outline.pdf

Architectural Graphics 1
Archi_OBE_Rev07/2020
HOLY ANGEL UNIVERSITY
SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING & ARCHITECTURE
Department of Architecture
COURSE OUTLINE: Syllabus in Architectural Visual Communication 1 – AGRAPHICS1
1st
Semester, Curriculum 2018-2019
Holy Angel University VMs
Vision: To become a role-model catalyst for countryside development and one of the most influential, best-managed Catholic
universities in the Asia-Pacific region.
Mission: To offer accessible quality education that transforms students into persons of conscience, competence, and compassion.
School of Engineering and Architecture VMs
Vision
A center of excellence in engineering and architecture education imbued with Catholic mission and identity serving as a role-
model catalyst for countryside development
Mission
The School shall provide accessible quality engineering and architecture education leading to highly competent professionals;
continually contribute to the advancement of knowledge and technology through research activities; and support countryside
development through environmental preservation and community involvement.
Institutional Student Learning Outcomes (ISLOs)
1. Show effective communication
2. Demonstrate appropriate value and sound ethical reasoning
3. Apply critical and creative thinking
4. Utilize civic and global learning
5. Use applied and collaborative learning
6. Employ aesthetic engagement

7. Show Information and Communication Technology (ICT) Literacy
Program Educational Objectives (PEOs)
Within a few years after graduation, the graduates of BS Architecture program should have:
1. Demonstrated professional competencies in accordance with the scope of the global and local practice of architecture as
evidenced by:
● the sound technical designs and systems that conform with existing laws and ethical standards theyproduced
● the recognition and certification they received for exemplary achievement
2. Shown a commitment to life-long learning and receptiveness to new ideas and knowledge through scientific research as
evidenced by:
● the graduate degrees or further studies they pursue
● the professional certifications they possess which are locally and internationally recognized
● the knowledge and skills on recent technological advances in the field they continuously acquire
3. Shown success in their chosen profession or career evidenced by:
● the key level positions they hold or promotions they get in their workplace
● the good track record they possess
● the professional visibility (e.g., publications, presentations, patents, inventions, awards, etc.)they are involvedwith
● international activities (e.g., participation in international conferences, collaborative research, employment abroad, etc.)
they are engaged with
● the entrepreneurial activities they undertake
4. Directed and focused the thrust of architecture to the needs and demands of society and its integration into the social,
economic, cultural and environmental aspects of nation building as evidenced by:
● their participation in University-based community extension initiatives as alumni
● their contribution to the needs and demands of society through innovations/ inventions towards environmental
preservation, socio-economic and socio-cultural integration for nation building
● their engagement in advocacies and volunteer works for the uplifting of the quality of life and human dignity especially the
marginalized

Relationship of the Program Educational Objectives to the Mission of the School of Engineering & Architecture:
Architecture Program
Educational Objectives (PEOs):
Within a few years after
graduation, the graduates of the
BS Architecture program should
have:
Mission
The School shall provide
accessible quality engineering
and architecture education
leading to highly competent
professionals.
The School shall continually
contribute to the
advancement of knowledge
and technology through
research activities.
The School shall support
countryside development
through environmental
preservation and community
involvement.
1. Demonstrated professional
competencies in accordance
with the scope of the global and
local practice of architecture.
✔ ✔ ✔
2. Shown a commitment to
life-long learning and
receptiveness to new ideas and
knowledge through scientific
research.
✔
3. Shown success in their
chosen profession or career.
✔ ✔
4. Directed and focused the
thrust of architecture to the
needs and demands of society
and its integration into the
social, economic, cultural and
environmental aspects of nation
building.
✔ ✔

Relationship of the Institutional Student Learning Outcomes to the Program Educational Objectives:
PEO 1 PEO 2 PEO 3 PEO 4
ISLO1: Show effective communication ✔ ✔
ISLO2: Demonstrate appropriate value and sound ethical
reasoning
✔ ✔ ✔ ✔
ISLO3: Apply critical and creative thinking ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔
ISLO4: Utilize civic and global learning ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔
ISLO5: Use applied and collaborative learning ✔ ✔
ISLO6: Employ aesthetic engagement ✔ ✔
ISLO7: Show Information and Communication Technology (ICT)
Literacy
✔ ✔
Architecture Program Outcomes (POs)
After finishing the BS Architecture program graduates should be able to:
a. create architectural solutions by applying knowledge in history, theory, planning, building technology and utilities, structural
concepts and professional practice
b. use concepts and principles from specialized fields and allied disciplines into various architecturalproblems
c. interpret and apply relevant laws, codes, charters and standards of architecture and the built environment
d. apply research methods to address architectural problems
e. use various information and communication technology (ICT) media for architectural solutions, presentation, and techniques
in design and construction
f. demonstrate entrepreneurial and business acumen relevant to architectural practice
g. participate in the management of construction works and building administration and preparation of contract documents,
technical reports and other legal documents used in architectural practice adhering to applicable laws, standards and
regulations
h. recognize the professional, social and ethical responsibilities and the service orientation of the architectural profession
i. effectively communicate orally and in writing using English or Filipino
j. perform effectively and efficiently in multi-disciplinary and multi-cultural teams in diverse fields ofpractice
k. participate in the generation of new knowledge such as pioneering concepts and ideas of site and building design beyond the
regular physical and location boundaries and contexts

l. engage in service-learning program for the promotion and preservation to local culture and tradition as well as to community
and pastoral initiatives
m. participate in various types of employment, development activities, and public discourses particularly in response to the needs
of the communities that one serves
Relationship of the Architecture Program Outcomes to the Program Educational Objectives:
Architecture Program Outcomes (POs):
At the time of graduation, BS Architecture program graduates should be able to:
PEOs
1 2 3 4
(a) create architectural solutions by applying knowledge in history, theory, planning, building
technology and utilities, structural concepts and professional practice.
✔ ✔ ✔ ✔
(b) use concepts and principles from specialized fields and allied disciplines into various
architectural problems.
✔ ✔ ✔
(c) interpret and apply relevant laws, codes, charters and standards of architecture and the built
environment.
✔ ✔
(d) apply research methods to address architectural problems. ✔ ✔
(e) use various information and communication technology (ICT) media for architectural solutions,
presentation, and techniques in design and construction.
✔
(f) demonstrate entrepreneurial and business acumen relevant to architectural practice. ✔ ✔
(g) participate in the management of construction works and building administration and
preparation of contract documents, technical reports and other legal documents used in
architectural practice adhering to applicable laws, standards and regulations.
✔ ✔
(h) recognize the professional, social and ethical responsibilities and the service orientation of the
architectural profession
✔ ✔ ✔ ✔
(i) effectively communicate orally and in writing using English or Filipino ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔
(j) perform effectively and efficiently in multi-disciplinary and multi-cultural teams in diverse fields
of practice.
✔ ✔ ✔
(k) participate in the generation of new knowledge such as pioneering concepts and ideas of site
and building design beyond the regular physical and location boundaries and contexts.
✔ ✔

(l) engage in service-learning program for the promotion and preservation to local culture and
tradition as well as to community and pastoral initiatives.
✔
(m) participate in various types of employment, development activities, and public discourses
particularly in response to the needs of the communities that one serves.
✔ ✔ ✔ ✔
Course Outcomes (COs)
1. Prepare typographic composition using architectural lettering by properly using drawing instruments and drafting
paraphernalia
2. Apply alphabet of lines and appropriate drafting techniques in producing geometric drawings
3. Prepare orthographic drawings, compile and submit portfolio of works
Course Outcomes a b c d e f g h i j k l m
CO1. Prepare typographic composition using architectural lettering by properly using
drawing instruments and drafting paraphernalia
I P
CO2. Apply alphabet of lines and appropriate drafting techniques in producing
geometric drawings I I
CO3. Prepare orthographic drawings, compile and submit portfolio of works
I

Code Descriptor Description
I Introductory Course Students get introduced to concepts / principles
P Practice Course Students practice the competencies w/ supervision
D Demonstrative Course Students practice the competencies across
different settings w/ minimal supervision
I. Course Description: The study of visual communication, typography, alphabet of lines and their applications and the use and
care of instruments, geometric construction, use of scale, mensuration and dimensioning. Emphasis is given to the study of the
theory of projection with analysis of the relationship between points, lines and planes in space. Includes exercises on surface
development and graphic presentation
II. Course Credit: 3 Units (1 Hour Lecture & 6 Hours Studio)
III. Prerequisite: NONE
IV. Textbook : American Institute of Architects, (2008). Architectural graphic standards 12th
Edition, New Jersey: John
Wiley
Bertoline, G.R. (2002). Fundamentals of Graphics Communication 3rd Edition. Boston: McGraw-Hill
Ching, F.D.K. (2015). Architectural Graphics (6th ed). New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Wakita, O.A., Backhoum, N.R., Linde, R.M. (2017). The Professional Practice of Architectural Working
Drawings (5th
ed.). New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Weidhaas, E.R. (1989). Architectural Drafting and Design (6th ed). Boston, London, Sydney, Toronto:
Allyn and Bacon
Yee, R. (2013). Architectural Drawing: A Visual Compendium of Types and Methods (4th ed). New
Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
V. Requirements: Drawing Plates
Progress Works
Research Works
Major/ Minor Graphic Plates
Written Exam

Learning Outline
Week
(Hours
)
CO Code
Link
Learning
output
At the end of
the lesson,
the student
will be able
to:
Student output Topics /
Course
Content
Core values
(Sub values)
Methodology Evaluation/
Learning
Assessment
1 □ CO1 □ Recognize the
intended
course
outcomes for
Architectural
Visual
Communication
1
□ Identify the
uses of
different
drafting
materials/equip
ment
□ Distinguish the
proper caring of
drafting
materials
□ Analyze the
differences
and rational
behind
□ Creative Orientatio Christ-centeredness □ Facilitate
lecture
through
in-class /
online class
discussion
□ Synchronous
E-Learning
using Canvas
Network
□ Use of
Synchronous
E-learning
tools such as
Video-confere
ncing, instant
messaging,
chat and
audio-confere
ncing.
 Class
(7hrs) □ CO2 Exercise/s n to (Prayerfulness) Diagnostic
Graphics Assessment
□ Sharing of 1& Community &
Personal Course Societal ● Assessment
Insights Outcome Responsibility of the quality
s (Solidarity, of personal
Commitment, insights and
Involvement, individual
Drawing Volunteerism) reactions
Instrumen through
ts use Excellence online and /
and care (Competence, or personal
Accuracy, Being consultation
Logical) when
feasible.
Integrity
(Conscientiousness,
Accountability)

different tools
and materials/
medium in
drafting
□ Illustrate and
associate
drafting/
mechanical
drawings
with the
different
media of the
students
□ Use of
Asynchronou
s E-learning
methods
2 □ CO1 □ Define and
understand
the meaning
and uses of
lines in
drafting/
mechanical
drawings
□ Define the
properties of
architectural
lettering and
numerals
□ Display
effective
drafting skills
by using a
scaled and a
generally
accepted
□ Working
Drawings
Lettering □ Christ-centeredn
ess
(Prayerfulness)
□ Community &
Societal
Responsibility
□ (Solidarity,
Commitment,
Involvement,
Volunteerism)
□ Excellence
Competence,
Accuracy, Being
Logical)
□ Integrity
□ Facilitate □ Assessment
(7 hrs) □ CO2 and lecture of drafting
Numerals through quality
in-class / through the
Types of online class use of
Lines, discussion specific
Line grading
weights & □ Synchronous Rubric (as
Dimensio E-Learning reflected on
ning using Canvas Canvas
Network Network)
□ Use of □ Assessment
Synchronous of the quality
E-learning of personal
tools such as insights and
Video-confere individual
ncing, instant reactions
messaging, through
chat and online and /
or personal

drafting
techniques
□ Apply and
practice good
and accepted
standard of
dimensioning
(Conscientiousn
ess,
Accountability)
audio-confere
ncing.
consultation
when
feasible.
□ Video
presentation
of
Pre-recorded
lecture /
discussions
and other
related videos
(e.g.
YouTube)
□ Use of
Asynchronou
s E-learning
methods
3 □ CO1 □ Draw and □ Working
Drawings
Drafting □ Christ-centeredn
ess
(Prayerfulness)
□ Community &
Societal
Responsibility
□ (Solidarity,
Commitment,
Involvement,
Volunteerism)
□ Excellence
(7 hrs) □ CO2 associate Geometry, lecture of drafting
geometry Mensuratio through quality
with n & Scaling in-class / through the
mensuration online class use of
and scale discussion specific
grading
□ Distinguish □ Synchronous Rubric (as
the different E-Learning reflected on
properties of using Canvas Canvas
lines, their Network Network)
weight and
correspondin □ Use of □ Assessment
g pens/ Synchronous of the quality

media (Competence,
Accuracy, Being
Logical)
□ Integrity
(Conscientiousn
ess,
Accountability)
needed for a tools such as insights and
certain task Video-confere individual
messaging, through
□ Display chat and online and /
effective audio-confere or personal
drafting skills ncing. consultation
by using a when
scaled and a □ Video feasible.
generally presentation
accepted of
drafting Pre-recorded
technique lecture /
discussions
and other
related videos
(e.g.
YouTube)
□ Use of
Asynchronou
s E-learning
methods
4-5
(14 hrs)
□ CO1
□ CO2
□ CO3
□ Know the
importance
and
application of
orthographic
drawing
□ Know the
importance
□ Working
Drawings
Orthograp
hic
Projection
Products
□ Christ-centeredn
ess
(Prayerfulness)
□ Community &
Societal
Responsibility
□ Facilitate
lecture
through
in-class /
online class
discussion
□ Assessment
of drafting
quality
through the
use of
specific
grading
Rubric (as

and
application of
auxiliary
views
□ Analyze and
compare the
different
views of an
object
□ Produce
good drafting
habits in
connection
to the
accepted
standards
□ Display
effective
drafting
language
skills by
using a
precise
orthographic
drawing&
auxiliary
views of an
object
(Solidarity,
Commitment,
Involvement,
Volunteerism)
□ Excellence
(Competence,
Accuracy, Being
Logical)
□ Integrity
(Conscientiousn
ess,
Accountability)
□ Synchronous reflected on
E-Learning Canvas
using Canvas Network)
Network
□ Assessment
□ Use of of the quality
Synchronous of personal
E-learning insights and
tools such as individual
Video-confere reactions
ncing, instant through
messaging, online and /
chat and or personal
audio-confere consultation
ncing. when
feasible.
□ Video
presentation
of
Pre-recorded
lecture /
discussions
and other
related videos
(e.g.
YouTube)
□ Use of
Asynchronou
s E-learning
methods
6 PRELIM EXAMINATION - (Online summative assessment via performance deliverable)

(7 hrs)
7-8 □ CO1 □ Analyze and
compare the
difference
between
oblique
cavalier and
isometric
drawings and
their
application
□ Associate the
elements of
axonometric
drawings
with the other
drafting
techniques
□ Display
effective
drafting
language
skills by
using oblique
cavalier and
isometric
drawings and
interpreting
irregular/
complicated
problems
□ Apply and
practice
isometric
□ Working
Drawings
Axonometric □ Christ-centeredn
ess
(Prayerfulness)
□ Community &
Societal
Responsibility
(Solidarity,
Commitment,
Involvement,
Volunteerism)
□ Excellence
(Competence,
Accuracy, Being
Logical)
□ Integrity
(Conscientiousn
ess,
Accountability)
(14 hrs) □ CO2 Projection lecture of drafting
□ CO3 through quality
online class use of
discussion specific
grading
□ Synchronous Rubric (as
E-Learning reflected on
using Canvas Canvas
Network Network)
□ Use of □ Assessment
Synchronous of the quality
tools such as insights and
Video-confere individual
messaging, through
chat and online and /
audio-confere or personal
ncing. consultation
when
□ Video feasible.
presentation
of
Pre-recorded
lecture /
discussions
and other
related videos
(e.g.
YouTube)

drawings as
a good
alternative in
three-dimens
ional
presentation
in
consideration
of accuracy
and speed
□ Display
effective
skills in
scaling and
mensuration
in building
three-dimens
ional
blocks/model
based on the
given
orthographic
drawings
□ Display
effective
communicati
on skills,
solidarity,
involvement
and conflict
resolution
and
management
in individual
□ Use of
Asynchronou
s E-learning
methods

or group
work/project
9- □ CO1 □ Apply
orthographic/
axonometric
projection,
line values,
lettering and
dimensioning
through the
creation of
floor plans,
roof plans,
elevations
and sections
□ Progress Architectural □ Christ-centeredn
ess
(Prayerfulness)
□ Community &
Societal
Responsibility
(Solidarity,
Commitment,
Involvement,
Volunteerism)
□ Excellence
(Competence,
Accuracy, Being
Logical)
□ Integrity
(Conscientiousn
ess,
Accountability)
(7 hrs) □ CO2 Work Drawings lecture of drafting
□ CO3 (Floor Plan through quality
and Roof in-class / through the
Plan) online class use of
discussion specific
grading
□ Individual Rubric (as
Consultation reflected on
through Canvas
in-class / Network)
online class.
□ Assessment
□ Synchronous of the quality
E-Learning of personal
using Canvas insights and
Network individual
reactions
□ Use of through
Synchronous online and /
E-learning or personal
tools such as consultation
Video-confere when
ncing, instant feasible.
messaging,
chat and
audio-confere
ncing.
□ Use of
Asynchronou

s E-learning
methods
10-11 □ CO1 □ Apply
orthographic/
axonometric
projection,
line values,
lettering and
dimensioning
through the
creation of
floor plans,
roof plans,
elevations
and sections
□ Progress Architectural □ Christ-centeredn
ess
(Prayerfulness)
□ Community &
Societal
Responsibility
(Solidarity,
Commitment,
Involvement,
Volunteerism)
□ Excellence
(Competence,
Accuracy, Being
Logical)
□ Integrity
(Conscientiousn
ess,
Accountability)
(14 hrs) □ CO2 Work Drawings lecture of drafting
□ CO3 (Elevations through quality
and Sections) in-class / through the
online class use of
discussion specific
grading
through Canvas
in-class / Network)
online class.
□ Assessment
Network individual
reactions
□ Use of through
Video-confere when
messaging,
chat and
audio-confere
ncing.

□ Use of
Asynchronou
s E-learning
methods
12
(7 hrs)
MIDTERM EXAMINATION - Online summative assessment via deliverable (Option 1) or
FTF mid-term examination with strict physical distancing (Option 2)
13-15 □ CO1 □ Apply □ Progress Work Drafting of □ Christ-centeredn
ess
(Prayerfulness)
□ Community &
Societal
Responsibility
(Solidarity,
Commitment,
Involvement,
Volunteerism)
□ Excellence
(Competence,
Accuracy, Being
Logical)
□ Integrity
(Conscientiousn
ess,
Accountability)
(14 hrs) □ CO2 orthographic/ Floor Plan lecture of drafting
□ CO3 axonometric on Site, through quality
projection, Elevations, in-class / through the
line values, Sections online class use of
lettering and and Roof discussion specific
dimensioning Plan for grading
through the the □ Individual Rubric (as
creation of ArDesign1 Consultation reflected on
floor plans, Major Plate through Canvas
roof plans, in-class / Network)
elevations online class.
and sections □ Assessment
□ Realize using Canvas insights and
relation of Network individual
Graphics 1 to reactions
design and □ Use of through
other Synchronous online and /
architectural E-learning or personal
subjects tools such as consultation
Video-confere when

messaging,
chat and
audio-confere
ncing.
□ Use of
Asynchronou
s E-learning
methods
16-17 □ CO3 □ Apply
orthographic/
axonometric
projection,
line values,
lettering and
dimensioning
through the
creation of
floor plans,
roof plans,
elevations
and sections
□ Major Plate Capstone □ Christ-centeredn
ess
(Prayerfulness)
□ Community &
Societal
Responsibility
(Solidarity,
Commitment,
Involvement,
Volunteerism)
□ Excellence
(Competence,
Accuracy, Being
Logical)
□ Integrity
(Conscientiousn
ess,
Accountability)
(14 hrs) Project lecture of drafting
through quality
online class use of
discussion specific
grading
through Canvas
in-class / Network)
online class.
□ Assessment
Network individual
reactions
□ Use of through

Video-confere
ncing, instant
messaging,
chat and
audio-confere
ncing.
□ Use of
Asynchronou
s E-learning
methods
when
feasible.
18
(7 hrs)
FINAL EXAMINATION - Online summative assessment via deliverable (Option 1) or
FTF mid-term examination with strict physical distancing (Option 2)

Final Course Output
Learning Outcome Required Output/s Due
Date
Identify the uses of different drafting materials/equipment, distinguish proper caring and
analyze the differences and rational behind different tools and materials/ medium in drafting
Distinguish the different properties of lines, their weight and corresponding pens/ media
needed for a certain task
Display effective drafting skills by using a scaled and a generally accepted drafting
techniques
Practice good lettering labeling design and drafting projects and apply and practice good
and accepted standard of dimensioning
Apply the basic drafting and design standards of site, floor and roof plans, elevations, and
sections with the application of orthographic and axonometric projections.
Display effective drafting language skills in engineering plans/drawings
Major Plate: Residential
Bungalow (verify)
Week
18

Rubric for Assessment
Criteria Needs Improvement
(10-13pts)
Satisfactory
(14-15pts)
Good
(16-17pts)
Excellent
(18-20pts)
Dimension (20pts) No or incomplete
dimension text.
Extension lines are
touching the drawing. No
Dimension text are not
placed above dimension
line and in between
extension lines.
Dimension text are
placed above dimension
line and in between
extension lines.
Dimension text are
placed above
dimension line and in
between extension
arrowheads placed
between dimension and
extension lines
Extension lines are
touching the drawing. No
arrowheads placed
extension lines
Extension lines are
touching the drawing.
Arrowheads are barely
visible and centered in
extension lines
lines. Extension lines
are not touching the
drawing. Arrowheads
are visible and centered
in between dimension
and extension lines
Line values (20pts) Assigned line weights
and line types in the
drawings and dimensions
are mostly incorrect
Assigned line weights
drawings and
dimensions are partially
correct
drawings and
dimensions are almost
all correct
drawings and
dimensions are all
correct
Lettering (20pts) Letters and numbers are
not neatly done, not even
following the prescribed
fonts to be used
Letters and numbers are
barely done in a neat
way following vertical
gothic normal font,
century gothic font or
any related fonts
Letters and numbers are
almost neatly done
following vertical gothic
normal font, century
gothic font or any related
fonts
Letters and numbers
are neatly done
following vertical gothic
normal font, century
gothic font or any
related fonts
3D Thinking (20pts) Ability to structure
information based on
drawings is lacking
Ability to structure
drawings is manifesting
from the student but still
needs to be improved
drawings is evident
drawings is very much
evident
Scale and measurement
drawing proportionality,
Neatness of drawing and
workmanship (20pts)
Did not measure and
draw scale, many
measurements are not
proportionally accurate.
All drawings are not
neatly done
Measured and drawn
proportionally
consistently. Slightly
neat in appearance
Stands out clearly, neat
in appearance and is
accurate. However,
Minor errors in
appearance do not
detract from overall
quality
Successfully measured
and drawn all of the
time. Extremely neat in
appearance with
unmatched attention to
details.

References:
1. Bertoline, G.R. (2002). Fundamentals of Graphics Communication(3rd ed). Boston: McGraw-Hill
2. Ching, F.D.K. (2015). Architectural Graphics (6th ed). New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
3. Weidhaas, E.R. (1989). Architectural Drafting and Design (6th ed). Boston, London, Sydney, Toronto: Allyn and Bacon
4. Wakita, O.A., Backhoum, N.R., Linde, R.M. (2017). The Professional Practice of Architectural Working Drawings (5th ed).
New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
5. Yee, R. (2013). Architectural Drawing: A Visual Compendium of Types and Methods (4th ed). New Jersey: John
Wiley & Sons, Inc.
6. American Institute of Architects, (2008). Architectural graphic standards (12th ed). New Jersey: JohnWiley
Online References:
1. Alvin Drafting. (21, June 2016). Drafting Tools 101 - How to Read Architect and Engineer Scales. Retrieved from
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQY7fUmtjPw
2. Alvin Drafting. (21, June 2016). Drafting Tools 101 - Model Making Tools for Drafting. Retrieved from
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_eXd_I7KHXo
3. Daniel M. Herbert (1988) Study Drawings in Architectural Design: Their Properties as a Graphic Medium, Journal of
Architectural Education, 41:2, (26-38), https://doi.org/10.1080/10464883.1988.10758473
4. Educational Video Library. (11, March 2018). Drafting Tips - Basic Drafting Techniques - Penn State University. Retrieved
from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Axj3essEW1Y
Expectations from Students
Students are held responsible for meeting the standards of performance established for each course. Their performance and
compliance with other course requirements are the bases for passing or failing in each course, subject to the rules of the University.
The students are expected to take all examinations on the date scheduled, read the assigned topics prior to class, submit and comply
with all the requirements of the subject as scheduled, attend each class on time and participate actively in the discussions.
Furthermore, assignments such as reports, reaction papers and the like shall be submitted on the set deadline as scheduled by the
faculty. Extension of submission is approved for students with valid reasons like death in the family, hospitalization and other
unforeseen events. Hence, certificates are needed for official documentation. Students assigned by the University in
extracurricular activities (Choral, Dance Troupe and Athletes) are excused from attending the class, however, said students are not
excused from classroom activities that coincide the said University activities. Special quiz is given to students with valid reasons

like death in the family, hospitalization and other unforeseen events. Hence, certificates are needed for official documentation.
Likewise, special major examination is given to students with the same reasons above. Attendance shall be checked every meeting.
Students shall be expected to be punctual in their classes. And observance of classroom decorum is hereby required as prescribed
by student’s handbook.
Academic Integrity
It is the mission of the University to train its students in the highest levels of professionalism and integrity. In support of this, academic
integrity is highly valued and violations are considered serious offenses. Examples of violations of academic integrity include, but are
not limited to, the following:
1.Plagiarism – using ideas, data or language of another without specific or proper acknowledgment. Example: Copying text from the
Web site without quoting or properly citing the page URL, using crib sheet during examination. For a clear description of what
constitutes plagiarism as well as strategies for avoiding it, students may refer to the Writing Tutorial Services web site at Indiana
University using the following link: http://www.indiana.edu/~wts/pamhlets.shtml. For citation styles, students may refer to
http://www.uwsp.edu/psych/apa4b.htm.
2. Cheating – using or attempting to use unauthorized assistance, materials, or study aids during examination or other academic
work. Examples: using a cheat sheet in a quiz or exam, altering a grade exam and resubmitting it for a better grade.
3. Fabrication – submitting contrived or improperly altered information in any academic requirements. Examples: making up data for
a research project, changing data to bias its interpretation, citing nonexistent articles, contriving sources.
(Reference: Code of Academic Integrity and Charter of the Student Disciplinary System of the University of Pennsylvania at
http://www.vpul.upenn.edu/osl/acadint.html).
Policy on Absences
1. Students should not incur absences of more than 20% of the required total number of class and laboratory periods in a given
semester.
The maximum absences allowed per semester are:
For subjects held 1x a week, a maximum of 3 absences;
For subjects held 2x a week, a maximum of 7 absences; and
For subjects held 3x a week, a maximum of 10 absences.
2. A student who incurs more than the allowed number of absences in any subject shall be given a mark of “FA” as his final
rating for the semester, regardless of his performance in the class.
3. Attendance is counted from the first official day of regular classes regardless of the date of enrolment.

Other Policies
• Major written exams shall be facilitated departmentally.
• Progress will be checked every meeting. In cases when there is interruption of classes, the checking will be done on another
day (within the same week) set by the course facilitator.
Grading System (Campus ++):
Class Standing: 50%
Esquisses
Progress Works
Minor Plates
Assignments
Research Works
Major Exams: 50%
Major Graphic Plates
Major Written Exam
Passing Raw Score: 70
Passing Percentage: 75%
Date
Prepared:
Date
Effectivity:
Prepared By: Checked By: References Certified By: Approved By:
July
2020
August 2020
Ar. Noemie D. Ng
Faculty,
Architecture Department
Ar. Franz Allan
Rodriguez
Chairperson, Architecture
Department
Ms. Marivic M. Pantig
OIC- Director, University
Library
Dr. Filipina I. de Guzman
Dean, School of Engineering
and Architecture
07/20
07/20

2018-2019-AGRAPHICS1-Course-Outline.pdf

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

Similar to 2018-2019-AGRAPHICS1-Course-Outline.pdf

Similar to 2018-2019-AGRAPHICS1-Course-Outline.pdf (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

2018-2019-AGRAPHICS1-Course-Outline.pdf