SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 33
Capability Maturity Model
What is CMM?
 CMM: Capability Maturity Model
 Developed by the Software Engineering
Institute of the Carnegie Mellon
University
 Framework that describes the key
elements of an effective software
process.
 Describes an evolutionary improvement
path for software organizations from an
ad hoc, immature process to a mature,
disciplined one.
 Provides guidance on how to gain
control of processes for developing and
maintaining software and how to evolve
toward a culture of software engineering
and management excellence.
What is CMM?
Process Maturity Concepts
 Software Process
 set of activities, methods, practices, and
transformations that people use to develop and
maintain software and the associated products
(e.g., project plans, design documents, code, test
cases, user manuals)
 Software Process Capability
 describes the range of expected results that can
be achieved by following a software process
 means of predicting the most likely outcomes to
be expected from the next software project the
organization undertakes
Process Maturity Concepts
 Software Process Performance
 actual results achieved by following a software
process
 Software Process Maturity
 extent to which a specific process is explicitly
defined, managed, measured, controlled and
effective
 implies potential growth in capability
 indicates richness of process and consistency with
which it is applied in projects throughout the
organization
What are the CMM Levels?
(The five levels of software process maturity)
Maturity level indicates level of process
capability:
 Initial
 Repeatable
 Defined
 Managed
 Optimizing
Level 1: Initial
 Initial : The software process is characterized
as ad hoc, and occasionally even chaotic. Few
processes are defined, and success depends
on individual effort.
 At this level, frequently have difficulty making
commitments that the staff can meet with an orderly
process
 Products developed are often over budget and
schedule
 Wide variations in cost, schedule, functionality and
quality targets
 Capability is a characteristic of the individuals, not
of the organization
Level 2: Repeatable
 Basic process management processes are
established to track cost, schedule, and
functionality. The necessary process
discipline is in place to repeat earlier
successes on projects with similar
applications.
 Realistic project commitments based on results
observed on previous projects
 Software project standards are defined and
faithfully followed
 Processes may differ between projects
 Process is disciplined
 earlier successes can be repeated
Level 3: Defined
 The software process for both
management and engineering activities
is documented, standardized, and
integrated into a standard software
process for the organization. All projects
use an approved, tailored version of the
organization’s standard software
process for developing an maintaining
software.
Level 4: Managed
 Detailed measures of the software process
and product quality are collected. Both the
software process and products are
quantitatively understood and controlled.
 Narrowing the variation in process performance to
fall within acceptable quantitative bounds
 When known limits are exceeded, corrective
action can be taken
 Quantifiable and predictable
predict trends in process and product quality
Level 5: Optimizing
 Continuous process improvement is enabled
by quantitative feedback from the process
and from piloting innovative ideas and
technologies.
 Goal is to prevent the occurrence of defects
 Causal analysis
 Data on process effectiveness used for cost
benefit analysis of new technologies and
proposed process changes
Internal Structure to Maturity
Levels
 Except for level 1, each level is decomposed
into key process areas (KPA)
 Each KPA identifies a cluster of related
activities that, when performed collectively,
achieve a set of goals considered important
for enhancing software capability.
 commitment
 ability
 activity
 measurement
 verification
Level 2 KPAs
 Requirements Management
 Establish common understanding of customer
requirements between the customer and the
software project
 Requirements is basis for planning and managing
the software project
 Not working backwards from a given release date!
 Software Project Planning
 Establish reasonable plans for performing the
software engineering activities and for managing
the software project
Level 2 KPAs
 Software Project Tracking and Oversight
 Establish adequate visibility into actual progress
 Take effective actions when project’s performance
deviates significantly from planned
 Software Subcontract Management
 Manage projects outsourced to subcontractors
 Software Quality Assurance
 Provide management with appropriate visibility
into
process being used by the software projects
work products
Level 2 KPAs
 Software Configuration Management
 Establish and maintain the integrity of work
products
 Product baseline
 Baseline authority
Level 3 KPAs
 Organization Process Focus
 Establish organizational responsibility for software
process activities that improve the organization’s
overall software process capability
 Organization Process Definition
 Develop and maintain a usable set of software
process assets
stable foundation that can be institutionalized
basis for defining meaningful data for quantitative
process management
Level 3 KPAs
 Training Program
 Develop skills and knowledge so that individual
can perform their roles effectively and efficiently
 Organizational responsibility
 Needs identified by project
 Integrated Software Management
 Integrated engineering and management activities
 Engineering and management processes are
tailored from the organizational standard
processes
 Tailoring based on business environment and
project needs
Level 3 KPAs
 Software Product Engineering
 technical activities of the project are well defined
(SDLC)
 correct, consistent work products
 Intergroup Coordination
 Software engineering groups participate actively
with other groups
 Peer Reviews
 early defect detection and removal
 better understanding of the products
 implemented with inspections, walkthroughs, etc
Level 4 KPAs
 Quantitative Process Management
 control process performance quantitatively
 actual results from following a software process
 focus on identifying and correcting special causes
of variation with respect to a baseline process
 Software Quality Management
 quantitative understanding of software quality
products
process
Level 5 KPAs
 Process Change Management
 continuous process improvement to improve
quality, increase productivity, decrease cycle time
 Technology Change Management
 identify and transfer beneficial new technologies
tools
methods
processes
 Defect Prevention
 causal analysis of defects to prevent recurrence
What are the benefits ?
 Helps forge a shared vision of what software
process improvement means for the
organization
 Defines set of priorities for addressing
software problems
 Supports measurement of process by
providing framework for performing reliable
and consistent appraisals
 Provides framework for consistency of
processes and product
Why measure software and
software process?
Obtain data that helps us to better control
 schedule
 cost
 quality of software products
Consistent measurement provide
data for:
 Quantitatively expressing requirements,
goals, and acceptance criteria
 Monitoring progress and anticipating
problems
 Quantifying tradeoffs used in allocating
resources
 Predicting schedule, cost and quality
Measurements
 Historical
 Plan
 Actual
 Projections
SEI Core Measures
Unit of Measure Characteristics Addressed
Physical source lines of code
Logical source lines of code
Size, reuse, rework
Staff hours Effort, cost, resource allocations
Calendar dates for process
milestones
Calendar dates for deliverables
Schedule, progress
Problems and defects Quality, improvement trends,
rework, readiness for delivery
Examples of measurements for
size of work products
 Estimated number of requirements
 Actual number of requirements
 Estimated source lines of code (SLOC)
 Actual SLOC
 Estimated number of test cases
 Actual number of test cases
Example of measurements of
effort
 Estimated man-hours to design/code a
given module
 Actual man-hours expended for
designing/coding the module
 Estimated number of hours to run builds
for a given release
 Actual number of hours spent running
builds for the release
Examples of measurements of
quality of the work product
 Number of issues raised at
requirements inspection
 Number of requirements issues open
 Number of requirements issues closed
 Number of issues raised during code
inspection
 Number of defects opened during unit
testing
Examples of measurements of
quality of the work product
 Number of defects opened during
system testing
 Number of defects opened during UAT
 Number of defects still open
 Number of defects closed
 Defect age
Examples of measurements of
quality of the work product
 Total number of build failures
 Total number of defects fixed for a given
release
 Total number of defects verified and
accepted
 Total number of defects verified and
rejected

More Related Content

Similar to CMM.ppt

09 fse qualitymanagement
09 fse qualitymanagement09 fse qualitymanagement
09 fse qualitymanagement
Mohesh Chandran
 
Quality Management in Software Engineering SE24
Quality Management in Software Engineering SE24Quality Management in Software Engineering SE24
Quality Management in Software Engineering SE24
koolkampus
 
16103271 software-testing-ppt
16103271 software-testing-ppt16103271 software-testing-ppt
16103271 software-testing-ppt
atish90
 
Ch 4 components of the sqa system
Ch 4 components of the sqa systemCh 4 components of the sqa system
Ch 4 components of the sqa system
Kittitouch Suteeca
 
9.process improvement chapter 9
9.process improvement chapter 99.process improvement chapter 9
9.process improvement chapter 9
Warui Maina
 
Quality Management
Quality ManagementQuality Management
Quality Management
Buchiri
 

Similar to CMM.ppt (20)

Software_Verification_and_Validation.ppt
Software_Verification_and_Validation.pptSoftware_Verification_and_Validation.ppt
Software_Verification_and_Validation.ppt
 
Capability Maturity Model (CMM).pptx
Capability Maturity Model (CMM).pptxCapability Maturity Model (CMM).pptx
Capability Maturity Model (CMM).pptx
 
Capability Maturity Model (CMM) in Software Engineering
Capability Maturity Model (CMM) in Software EngineeringCapability Maturity Model (CMM) in Software Engineering
Capability Maturity Model (CMM) in Software Engineering
 
09 fse qualitymanagement
09 fse qualitymanagement09 fse qualitymanagement
09 fse qualitymanagement
 
Software Engineering
Software EngineeringSoftware Engineering
Software Engineering
 
Software Engineering
Software EngineeringSoftware Engineering
Software Engineering
 
M017548895
M017548895M017548895
M017548895
 
Planning And Monitoring The Process
Planning And Monitoring The ProcessPlanning And Monitoring The Process
Planning And Monitoring The Process
 
Slides chapters 26-27
Slides chapters 26-27Slides chapters 26-27
Slides chapters 26-27
 
IEEE 12207
IEEE 12207IEEE 12207
IEEE 12207
 
Quality Management in Software Engineering SE24
Quality Management in Software Engineering SE24Quality Management in Software Engineering SE24
Quality Management in Software Engineering SE24
 
16103271 software-testing-ppt
16103271 software-testing-ppt16103271 software-testing-ppt
16103271 software-testing-ppt
 
Lecture10
Lecture10Lecture10
Lecture10
 
Importance of software quality metrics
Importance of software quality metricsImportance of software quality metrics
Importance of software quality metrics
 
Software Engineering Practices and Issues.pptx
Software Engineering Practices and Issues.pptxSoftware Engineering Practices and Issues.pptx
Software Engineering Practices and Issues.pptx
 
Ch 4 components of the sqa system
Ch 4 components of the sqa systemCh 4 components of the sqa system
Ch 4 components of the sqa system
 
Cmm
CmmCmm
Cmm
 
9.process improvement chapter 9
9.process improvement chapter 99.process improvement chapter 9
9.process improvement chapter 9
 
Quality Management
Quality ManagementQuality Management
Quality Management
 
Ch27
Ch27Ch27
Ch27
 

Recently uploaded

Standard vs Custom Battery Packs - Decoding the Power Play
Standard vs Custom Battery Packs - Decoding the Power PlayStandard vs Custom Battery Packs - Decoding the Power Play
Standard vs Custom Battery Packs - Decoding the Power Play
Epec Engineered Technologies
 
Integrated Test Rig For HTFE-25 - Neometrix
Integrated Test Rig For HTFE-25 - NeometrixIntegrated Test Rig For HTFE-25 - Neometrix
Integrated Test Rig For HTFE-25 - Neometrix
Neometrix_Engineering_Pvt_Ltd
 
Cara Menggugurkan Sperma Yang Masuk Rahim Biyar Tidak Hamil
Cara Menggugurkan Sperma Yang Masuk Rahim Biyar Tidak HamilCara Menggugurkan Sperma Yang Masuk Rahim Biyar Tidak Hamil
Cara Menggugurkan Sperma Yang Masuk Rahim Biyar Tidak Hamil
Cara Menggugurkan Kandungan 087776558899
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Computer Networks Basics of Network Devices
Computer Networks  Basics of Network DevicesComputer Networks  Basics of Network Devices
Computer Networks Basics of Network Devices
 
Online electricity billing project report..pdf
Online electricity billing project report..pdfOnline electricity billing project report..pdf
Online electricity billing project report..pdf
 
Unit 4_Part 1 CSE2001 Exception Handling and Function Template and Class Temp...
Unit 4_Part 1 CSE2001 Exception Handling and Function Template and Class Temp...Unit 4_Part 1 CSE2001 Exception Handling and Function Template and Class Temp...
Unit 4_Part 1 CSE2001 Exception Handling and Function Template and Class Temp...
 
Thermal Engineering -unit - III & IV.ppt
Thermal Engineering -unit - III & IV.pptThermal Engineering -unit - III & IV.ppt
Thermal Engineering -unit - III & IV.ppt
 
Generative AI or GenAI technology based PPT
Generative AI or GenAI technology based PPTGenerative AI or GenAI technology based PPT
Generative AI or GenAI technology based PPT
 
Standard vs Custom Battery Packs - Decoding the Power Play
Standard vs Custom Battery Packs - Decoding the Power PlayStandard vs Custom Battery Packs - Decoding the Power Play
Standard vs Custom Battery Packs - Decoding the Power Play
 
S1S2 B.Arch MGU - HOA1&2 Module 3 -Temple Architecture of Kerala.pptx
S1S2 B.Arch MGU - HOA1&2 Module 3 -Temple Architecture of Kerala.pptxS1S2 B.Arch MGU - HOA1&2 Module 3 -Temple Architecture of Kerala.pptx
S1S2 B.Arch MGU - HOA1&2 Module 3 -Temple Architecture of Kerala.pptx
 
Employee leave management system project.
Employee leave management system project.Employee leave management system project.
Employee leave management system project.
 
Integrated Test Rig For HTFE-25 - Neometrix
Integrated Test Rig For HTFE-25 - NeometrixIntegrated Test Rig For HTFE-25 - Neometrix
Integrated Test Rig For HTFE-25 - Neometrix
 
A CASE STUDY ON CERAMIC INDUSTRY OF BANGLADESH.pptx
A CASE STUDY ON CERAMIC INDUSTRY OF BANGLADESH.pptxA CASE STUDY ON CERAMIC INDUSTRY OF BANGLADESH.pptx
A CASE STUDY ON CERAMIC INDUSTRY OF BANGLADESH.pptx
 
A Study of Urban Area Plan for Pabna Municipality
A Study of Urban Area Plan for Pabna MunicipalityA Study of Urban Area Plan for Pabna Municipality
A Study of Urban Area Plan for Pabna Municipality
 
COST-EFFETIVE and Energy Efficient BUILDINGS ptx
COST-EFFETIVE  and Energy Efficient BUILDINGS ptxCOST-EFFETIVE  and Energy Efficient BUILDINGS ptx
COST-EFFETIVE and Energy Efficient BUILDINGS ptx
 
FEA Based Level 3 Assessment of Deformed Tanks with Fluid Induced Loads
FEA Based Level 3 Assessment of Deformed Tanks with Fluid Induced LoadsFEA Based Level 3 Assessment of Deformed Tanks with Fluid Induced Loads
FEA Based Level 3 Assessment of Deformed Tanks with Fluid Induced Loads
 
Thermal Engineering-R & A / C - unit - V
Thermal Engineering-R & A / C - unit - VThermal Engineering-R & A / C - unit - V
Thermal Engineering-R & A / C - unit - V
 
School management system project Report.pdf
School management system project Report.pdfSchool management system project Report.pdf
School management system project Report.pdf
 
Theory of Time 2024 (Universal Theory for Everything)
Theory of Time 2024 (Universal Theory for Everything)Theory of Time 2024 (Universal Theory for Everything)
Theory of Time 2024 (Universal Theory for Everything)
 
Double Revolving field theory-how the rotor develops torque
Double Revolving field theory-how the rotor develops torqueDouble Revolving field theory-how the rotor develops torque
Double Revolving field theory-how the rotor develops torque
 
AIRCANVAS[1].pdf mini project for btech students
AIRCANVAS[1].pdf mini project for btech studentsAIRCANVAS[1].pdf mini project for btech students
AIRCANVAS[1].pdf mini project for btech students
 
Cara Menggugurkan Sperma Yang Masuk Rahim Biyar Tidak Hamil
Cara Menggugurkan Sperma Yang Masuk Rahim Biyar Tidak HamilCara Menggugurkan Sperma Yang Masuk Rahim Biyar Tidak Hamil
Cara Menggugurkan Sperma Yang Masuk Rahim Biyar Tidak Hamil
 
NO1 Top No1 Amil Baba In Azad Kashmir, Kashmir Black Magic Specialist Expert ...
NO1 Top No1 Amil Baba In Azad Kashmir, Kashmir Black Magic Specialist Expert ...NO1 Top No1 Amil Baba In Azad Kashmir, Kashmir Black Magic Specialist Expert ...
NO1 Top No1 Amil Baba In Azad Kashmir, Kashmir Black Magic Specialist Expert ...
 

CMM.ppt

  • 2. What is CMM?  CMM: Capability Maturity Model  Developed by the Software Engineering Institute of the Carnegie Mellon University  Framework that describes the key elements of an effective software process.
  • 3.  Describes an evolutionary improvement path for software organizations from an ad hoc, immature process to a mature, disciplined one.  Provides guidance on how to gain control of processes for developing and maintaining software and how to evolve toward a culture of software engineering and management excellence. What is CMM?
  • 4. Process Maturity Concepts  Software Process  set of activities, methods, practices, and transformations that people use to develop and maintain software and the associated products (e.g., project plans, design documents, code, test cases, user manuals)  Software Process Capability  describes the range of expected results that can be achieved by following a software process  means of predicting the most likely outcomes to be expected from the next software project the organization undertakes
  • 5. Process Maturity Concepts  Software Process Performance  actual results achieved by following a software process  Software Process Maturity  extent to which a specific process is explicitly defined, managed, measured, controlled and effective  implies potential growth in capability  indicates richness of process and consistency with which it is applied in projects throughout the organization
  • 6. What are the CMM Levels? (The five levels of software process maturity) Maturity level indicates level of process capability:  Initial  Repeatable  Defined  Managed  Optimizing
  • 7.
  • 8. Level 1: Initial  Initial : The software process is characterized as ad hoc, and occasionally even chaotic. Few processes are defined, and success depends on individual effort.  At this level, frequently have difficulty making commitments that the staff can meet with an orderly process  Products developed are often over budget and schedule  Wide variations in cost, schedule, functionality and quality targets  Capability is a characteristic of the individuals, not of the organization
  • 9. Level 2: Repeatable  Basic process management processes are established to track cost, schedule, and functionality. The necessary process discipline is in place to repeat earlier successes on projects with similar applications.  Realistic project commitments based on results observed on previous projects  Software project standards are defined and faithfully followed  Processes may differ between projects  Process is disciplined  earlier successes can be repeated
  • 10. Level 3: Defined  The software process for both management and engineering activities is documented, standardized, and integrated into a standard software process for the organization. All projects use an approved, tailored version of the organization’s standard software process for developing an maintaining software.
  • 11. Level 4: Managed  Detailed measures of the software process and product quality are collected. Both the software process and products are quantitatively understood and controlled.  Narrowing the variation in process performance to fall within acceptable quantitative bounds  When known limits are exceeded, corrective action can be taken  Quantifiable and predictable predict trends in process and product quality
  • 12. Level 5: Optimizing  Continuous process improvement is enabled by quantitative feedback from the process and from piloting innovative ideas and technologies.  Goal is to prevent the occurrence of defects  Causal analysis  Data on process effectiveness used for cost benefit analysis of new technologies and proposed process changes
  • 13. Internal Structure to Maturity Levels  Except for level 1, each level is decomposed into key process areas (KPA)  Each KPA identifies a cluster of related activities that, when performed collectively, achieve a set of goals considered important for enhancing software capability.  commitment  ability  activity  measurement  verification
  • 14.
  • 15.
  • 16. Level 2 KPAs  Requirements Management  Establish common understanding of customer requirements between the customer and the software project  Requirements is basis for planning and managing the software project  Not working backwards from a given release date!  Software Project Planning  Establish reasonable plans for performing the software engineering activities and for managing the software project
  • 17. Level 2 KPAs  Software Project Tracking and Oversight  Establish adequate visibility into actual progress  Take effective actions when project’s performance deviates significantly from planned  Software Subcontract Management  Manage projects outsourced to subcontractors  Software Quality Assurance  Provide management with appropriate visibility into process being used by the software projects work products
  • 18. Level 2 KPAs  Software Configuration Management  Establish and maintain the integrity of work products  Product baseline  Baseline authority
  • 19. Level 3 KPAs  Organization Process Focus  Establish organizational responsibility for software process activities that improve the organization’s overall software process capability  Organization Process Definition  Develop and maintain a usable set of software process assets stable foundation that can be institutionalized basis for defining meaningful data for quantitative process management
  • 20. Level 3 KPAs  Training Program  Develop skills and knowledge so that individual can perform their roles effectively and efficiently  Organizational responsibility  Needs identified by project  Integrated Software Management  Integrated engineering and management activities  Engineering and management processes are tailored from the organizational standard processes  Tailoring based on business environment and project needs
  • 21. Level 3 KPAs  Software Product Engineering  technical activities of the project are well defined (SDLC)  correct, consistent work products  Intergroup Coordination  Software engineering groups participate actively with other groups  Peer Reviews  early defect detection and removal  better understanding of the products  implemented with inspections, walkthroughs, etc
  • 22. Level 4 KPAs  Quantitative Process Management  control process performance quantitatively  actual results from following a software process  focus on identifying and correcting special causes of variation with respect to a baseline process  Software Quality Management  quantitative understanding of software quality products process
  • 23. Level 5 KPAs  Process Change Management  continuous process improvement to improve quality, increase productivity, decrease cycle time  Technology Change Management  identify and transfer beneficial new technologies tools methods processes  Defect Prevention  causal analysis of defects to prevent recurrence
  • 24. What are the benefits ?  Helps forge a shared vision of what software process improvement means for the organization  Defines set of priorities for addressing software problems  Supports measurement of process by providing framework for performing reliable and consistent appraisals  Provides framework for consistency of processes and product
  • 25. Why measure software and software process? Obtain data that helps us to better control  schedule  cost  quality of software products
  • 26. Consistent measurement provide data for:  Quantitatively expressing requirements, goals, and acceptance criteria  Monitoring progress and anticipating problems  Quantifying tradeoffs used in allocating resources  Predicting schedule, cost and quality
  • 28. SEI Core Measures Unit of Measure Characteristics Addressed Physical source lines of code Logical source lines of code Size, reuse, rework Staff hours Effort, cost, resource allocations Calendar dates for process milestones Calendar dates for deliverables Schedule, progress Problems and defects Quality, improvement trends, rework, readiness for delivery
  • 29. Examples of measurements for size of work products  Estimated number of requirements  Actual number of requirements  Estimated source lines of code (SLOC)  Actual SLOC  Estimated number of test cases  Actual number of test cases
  • 30. Example of measurements of effort  Estimated man-hours to design/code a given module  Actual man-hours expended for designing/coding the module  Estimated number of hours to run builds for a given release  Actual number of hours spent running builds for the release
  • 31. Examples of measurements of quality of the work product  Number of issues raised at requirements inspection  Number of requirements issues open  Number of requirements issues closed  Number of issues raised during code inspection  Number of defects opened during unit testing
  • 32. Examples of measurements of quality of the work product  Number of defects opened during system testing  Number of defects opened during UAT  Number of defects still open  Number of defects closed  Defect age
  • 33. Examples of measurements of quality of the work product  Total number of build failures  Total number of defects fixed for a given release  Total number of defects verified and accepted  Total number of defects verified and rejected