4. PAAS – an investment in silver
ü 2nd largest primary silver producer in the world
ü Portfolio of high-quality assets in the Americas
ü Large reserves: proven and probable of 286 Moz silver (1)
ü Growing, low-cost production profile
ü Significant exploration potential
ü Experienced mine builder and operator
ü Strong balance sheet
Our strategy is focused on extracting value from our portfolio of assets,
improving operating margins and deploying proven expertise to pursue
profitable growth.
4 May 24, 2017(1) Please refer to the Appendix for more detailed information on the Company’s reserves.
9. Progress on cost reductions
9 May 24, 2017
$12.03
$6.29
$22.26
$10.17
$0
$5
$10
$15
$20
$25
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Cash Costs AISCSOS
Consolidated Cash Costs per payable ounce of silver, net of by-products (“Cash Costs”)1
Consolidated All-in Sustaining Costs per Silver Ounce Sold (“AISCSOS”)1
(1) Cash Costs and AISCSOS are non-GAAP financial measures; see “Alternative Performance (non-GAAP) Measures” section of the Management’s Discussion
& Analysis for the period ended December 31, 2016 for a more detailed discussion of this and other non-GAAP measures and their calculation.
Main drivers of 2016 cost
reduction:
• Improved productivity ~45%
• FX gains ~30%
• Higher by-product prices ~15%
• Generally lower input costs and
export credits ~10%
11. Q1 2017 unaudited financial results
Consolidated Financial Highlights Q1 2017 Q1 2016
Revenue ($ millions) 198.7 158.3
Net earnings ($ millions)
per share
20.0
0.13
1.9
0.01
AISCSOS ($/ounce) (1) 12.63 13.12
Operating cash flow before changes in non-cash
operating working capital ($ millions)(2)
per share
40.8
0.27
28.4
0.19
11
(1) AISCSOS is a non-GAAP measure; see the “Alternative Performance (non-GAAP) Measures” section of Pan American’s Management’s Discussion & Analysis for the period
ended March 31, 2017 for a more detailed discussion of this and other non-GAAP measures and their calculation.
(2) Operating cash flow before changes in non-cash operating working capital is a non-GAAP measure calculated as net cash generated from operating activities less changes
in non-cash operating working capital, per share amounts are calculated using the basic weighted average shares outstanding for the period.
May 24, 2017
13. Financial strength
USD Millions
Cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments 205.4
Working capital (1) 423.0
Total debt (2) 43.8
Total available liquidity (3) 469.2
At March 31, 2017
13 May 24, 2017
(1) Working capital is a non-GAAP measure calculated as current assets less current liabilities. The Company and certain investors use this
information to evaluate whether the Company is able to meet its current obligations using its current assets.
(2) Total debt is a non-GAAP measure, and is inclusive of $7.6 million in capital leases.
(3) Total available liquidity is a non-GAAP measure, and includes cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments, and the undrawn portion of the
Company’s secured line of credit.
14. Q1 2017 operating results
Consolidated Q1 2017 Q1 2016
Silver production (million ounces) 6.2 6.4
Gold production (thousand ounces) 37.7 41.2
Zinc production (thousand tonnes) 12.8 12.8
Lead production (thousand tonnes) 5.3 4.8
Copper production (thousand tonnes) 3.2 3.9
Cash Costs(1) ($/ounce) 6.18 8.03
14 May 24, 2017
(1) Cash Costs per payable ounce of silver, net of by-product credits. Average by-product metal prices for Q1 2017 were: Au $1,219/oz, Zn $2,780/tonne,
Pb $2,278/tonne, and Cu $5,831/tonne. Average by-product metal prices for Q1 2016 were: Au $1,183/oz, Zn $1,679/tonne, Pb $1,744/tonne, and Cu
$4,672/tonne. Cash Costs is a non-GAAP measure; see the “Alternative Performance (non-GAAP) Measures" section of Pan American’s Management’s
Discussion & Analysis for the period ended March 31, 2017 for a more detailed discussion of this and other non-GAAP measures and their calculation.
17. Capital allocation priorities
17 May 24, 2017
$361
$491
$542
$423
$330
$227 $218
$0
$100
$200
$300
$400
$500
$600
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Millions US$
Cash & STI
Financial debt
Cumulative return to shareholders
$387 M in total cumulative cash returned to
shareholders (dividends and share buy-backs)
since 2010 in addition to investing $410 M in
project and expansion capital.
Pan American’s approach to capital management prioritizes investment in projects that generate a
high-rate of return, maintaining a strong balance sheet and returning cash to shareholders.
18. 0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
7.0
8.0
9.0
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Silver Grade (g/tonnes)
Million Tonnes
Probable (Mt)
Proven (Mt)
Silver Grade
(g/t)
La Colorada reserves increase >200%
18 May 24, 2017
30.4 Moz Ag
38.3 Moz Ag
44.1 Moz Ag
64.8 Moz Ag
81.4 Moz Ag
86 Moz Ag
91.2 Moz Ag
For La Colorada’s complete mineral reserve details, please see Appendix.
98.1 Moz Ag
20. La Colorada expansion (1)
20 May 24, 2017
Highlights
• 69% increase expected in average annual
silver production to 7.7 Moz by 2018
• 137% and 185% increase expected in zinc
and lead production, respectively, by 2018
Project Scope
• New 618-metre deep mine shaft – fully
commissioned in Q3 2016
• New sulphide processing plant – began
operating Q3 2016
• Underground development to open new
production areas – advancing on schedule for
completion in 2017
• New 115kV power line - targeted for
completion in 2017
(1) For additional information, please refer to the Company’s technical report entitled “Technical Report – Preliminary Economic Analysis for the Expansion of the La Colorada Mine, Zacatecas, Mexico”,
with an effective date of Dec. 31, 2013 available at www.SEDAR.com. The results of this preliminary economic assessment are preliminary in nature, in that it includes inferred mineral resources that are
considered too geologically speculative to have the economic considerations applied to them that would enable them to be categorized as mineral reserves, and there is no certainty that the assessment
will be realized. Mineral resources that are not mineral reserves have no demonstrated economic viability.
Original investment of $163.8M, including sustaining
capital. Project expected to be ~5% under budget
21. Organic growth – Dolores expansion
21 May 24, 2017
Underground
reserves
Tonnes
(Mt)
Ag g/t
Ag contained
(Moz)
Au g/t
Au contained
(koz)
Proven 1.1 81 2.8 1.28 44.3
Probable 3.0 58 5.6 1.73 167.2
Proven + Probable 4.1 64 8.4 1.61 211.5
Notes:
1 Mineral reserves were estimated using a price of $18.50 per ounce of silver and $1,300 per ounce of gold.
2 Mineral resource and reserve estimates for Dolores were prepared under the supervision of, or were reviewed by, Christopher Emerson, FAusIMM, and Martin G. Wafforn, P.Eng., as Qualified
Persons as that term is defined in NI 43-101.
22. Dolores expansion (1)
22 May 24, 2017
Highlights
• Increases average production for the first 5
years to:
5.3 Moz for silver (+39% vs 2016)
151 koz for gold (+47% vs 2016)
Project Scope
• New 5,600 tpd pulp agglomeration plant -
scheduled for start-up in mid 2017
• New underground mine - scheduled to
reach 1,500 tpd by end of 2017
• New 115 kV power line - energized in
September 2016
(1) For additional information, please refer to the Company’s technical report entitled “Technical Report for the Dolores Property, Chihuahua, Mexico”, with an effective date of Dec. 31, 2016
available at www.SEDAR.com.
Estimated capital investment ~$132.4 M (incl. power line)
Project on time and on budget
24. Exploration and production growth
24 May 24, 2017
• 2017 exploration budget of US$21M, up 45% from 2016
• Solid performance on replacing 2016 production with new silver reserves
• La Colorada continues to deliver both new reserves and extension to mine life
• High potential at Peru operations; near site and greenfield exploration
• La Negra (Kootenay Silver Inc.), Joaquin and COSE bring advanced silver exploration
projects into the pipeline with excellent regional exploration potential
• 100% owner of Navidad, one of the largest undeveloped silver deposits in the
world:
Navidad Silver Resources (1) Contained Ag
(Moz)
Tonnes
(Mt)
Ag (g/t)
Measured (contained Moz) 67.8 15.4 137
Indicated (contained Moz) 564.5 139.8 126
Inferred (contained Moz) 119.4 45.9 81
(1) Estimated using a price of $12.52/oz of silver
26. Adding high-grade deposits to realize further
value at Manantial Espejo
26 May 24, 2017
• Pan American acquired 100% of Coeur
Mining’s Joaquin project (1)
• Pan American to acquire 100% of
Patagonia Gold’s Cap-Oeste Sur Este
project (COSE) (2)
• Synergies with Pan American’s Manantial
Espejo operation
• Processing capacity available at Manantial
Espejo plant
• Projects are within trucking distance
• Potential for further exploration success
Joaquin is located about 145
km and COSE 180 km from
our Manantial Espejo mine
(1) For more information see press release dated Jan. 17, 2017
(2) Transaction expected to close May 31, 2017; for more information see press release dated April 25, 2017
27. Strategic initiatives that surfaced value
Maverix (1)
• Pan American realized value for assets hidden within its portfolio through sale to Maverix
Metals Inc. (royalties, precious metals streams)
• Provides additional leverage to gold and silver prices
• Maverix successful in attracting new growth prospects, such as recent acquisition of
additional royalties from Gold Fields Netherlands Services BV
• Maverix has a market cap of approx. CAD $211M and is up 96% since the acquisition of
Pan American assets closed(2)
• As at March 31, 2017, Pan American held approximately 37% of Maverix (41% fully-diluted)
Milpo Shalipayco Joint Venture
• Pan American sold 75% of its shares in Compania Minera Shalipayco SAC to Votorantim
Metais – Cajamarquilla SA for US$15M cash and 1% Net Smelter Return (sold to Maverix)
• Pan American receives free carry of its remaining 25% interest to commercial production in
this large zinc development project located in Peru
27 May 24, 2017
(1) See press releases dated July 11, 2016 and Dec. 27, 2016, available at www.sedar.com
(2) Based on Maverix (MMX) opening price on TSX-V on July 12, 2016 of CAD $0.70/share compared to closing price on May 19, 2017 of CAD $1.37/share
28. Why invest in PAAS now
28 May 24, 2017
1. Strong leverage to silver prices – a commodity with demand for
industrial uses and as a “safe-haven” investment
2. Low-cost silver producer with growing production over the next 3 years
3. Advanced exploration project pipeline – La Negra, Joaquin
4. Increasing free cash flow potential following completion of expansions at
La Colorada and Dolores
5. Optionality of Navidad, one of the world’s largest silver deposits
30. Company overview
• Listings: NASDAQ (PAAS) and TSX (PAAS)
• Market cap: US$2.6 B(1)
• Shares outstanding: approx. 153.1 M
• Average daily volume shares traded: 2.0 M(1)
• Dividends since 2010 - Current yield 0.6%(2)
30 May 24, 2017
51%
47%
2%
Ownership (3)
Reported Institutional
Retail and unidentified institutions
Insiders
All data as of close May 19, 2017
(1) Based on Nasdaq exchange
(2) Based on closing share price at May 19, 2017 and dividend declared May 9, 2017, annualized
(3) Source: IPREO
32. Q1 2017 operating results by mine
32
Mine Ag Production
(Moz)
Au Production
(koz)
$ Cash Costs (1)
La Colorada 1.63 0.87 3.01
Dolores 0.96 24.39 (1.67)
Alamo Dorado 0.35 1.33 21.29
Huaron 0.90 0.25 0.77
Morococha (2) 0.64 0.60 (3.18)
San Vicente (2) 0.93 0.12 12.47
Manantial Espejo 0.79 10.13 20.38
TOTAL (3) 6.20 37.70 6.18
(1) Cash costs per ounce of silver, net of by-product credits. Cash cost is a non-GAAP measure. Cash costs does not have a standardized meaning
prescribed by IFRS as an indicator of performance. The Company’s method of calculating cash costs may differ from the methods used by
other entities and, accordingly, the Company’s cash costs may not be comparable to similarly titled measures used by other entities; see the
“Alternative Performance (Non-GAAP) Measures” section of the Company’s Management’s Discussion & Analysis for the period ended March
31, 2017, for a more detailed description of this measure and its calculation.
(2) Represents the Company’s partial ownership interest.
(3) Totals may not add up due to rounding.
May 24, 2017
33. Q1 2017 capital expenditures
33 May 24, 2017
Mine US$M
La Colorada 2.2
Dolores 8.4
Huaron 2.6
Morococha 2.3
San Vicente 1.6
Manantial Espejo 1.1
Total Sustaining Capital 18.2
La Colorada Expansion Project 1.8
Dolores Expansion Project 13.1
Total Non-Sustaining Capital 14.9
Total Capital Expenditures 33.1
35. 2017 Guidance by mine
Mine
Silver Production
(million ounces)
Gold Production
(thousand ounces)
Cash Costs
($/ounce)(1)
La Colorada 6.4 - 6.9 3.3 - 3.5 3.35 - 3.95
Dolores 4.0 - 4.5 109.1 - 115.0 1.25 - 2.25
Alamo Dorado 0.3 1.4 - 1.5 18.00 - 20.00
Huaron 3.7 - 3.8 0.3 - 0.4 5.95 - 6.95
Morococha (92.3%)(2) 2.5 - 2.6 2.9 - 3.1 3.15 - 4.15
San Vicente (95%)(2) 4.4 - 4.5 0.5 - 0.6 10.90 - 11.90
Manantial Espejo 3.3 - 3.4 37.5 - 41.0 15.35 - 16.25
Total(3) 24.5 - 26.0 155.0 - 165.0 6.45 - 7.45
35 May 24, 2017
(1) Cash Costs is a non-GAAP measure; see the “Alternative Performance (Non-GAAP) Measures” section of the Company’s Management’s
Discussion & Analysis for the period ended March 31, 2017, for a more detailed description of this measure and its calculation.
(2) Reflects Pan American’s ownership in the operation.
(3) Totals may not add up due to rounding.
36. Three-year outlook
Consolidated 2017 Guidance 2018 Outlook 2019 Outlook
Silver production (million ounces) 24.5 – 26.0 26.0 - 28.0 26.5 – 29.5
Gold production (thousand ounces) 155 - 165 170 - 185 175 - 200
Zinc production (thousand tonnes) 56.5 - 58.5 59.0 - 63.0 55.0 - 65.0
Lead production (thousand tonnes) 19.0 - 20.0 23.0 - 26.0 23.0 - 27.0
Copper production (thousand tonnes) 8.75 - 9.25 6.00 - 8.00 4.00 - 4.20
Cash Costs(1)($/ounce) 6.45 - 7.45 5.60 - 7.10 5.20 – 6.80
Sustaining capital ($ millions) 82 - 88 75 - 85 75 - 90
Project Capital ($ millions) (2) 58 - 62 - -
AISCSOS(1) ($/ounce) 11.50 - 12.90 10.00 - 12.20 9.30 - 11.60
36 May 24, 2017
(1) Cash Costs and AISCSOS are non-GAAP measures; see the “Alternative Performance (non-GAAP) Measures" section of Pan American’s
Management’s Discussion and Analysis for the period ended March 31, 2017 for more information.
(2) Project Capital relates to the current mine expansions at La Colorada and Dolores; 2017 is expected to be the final year of spending on
project capital related to these expansions.
37. Pan American Silver Proven and Probable
Reserves at December 31, 2016 (1) (2)
Property Location Category Tonnes
(Mt)
Ag
g/t
Contained
Ag (Moz)
Au
g/t
Contained
Au (000’s oz)
Cu
%
Pb
%
Zn
%
Huaron Peru Proven 5.7 169 30.8 N/A 0.37 1.46 3.02
Probable 3.8 167 20.6 N/A 0.38 1.62 3.10
Morococha (92.3%) (3) Peru Proven 2.6 173 14.6 N/A 0.58 1.18 3.78
Probable 2.2 181 12.8 N/A 0.44 1.64 4.21
La Colorada Mexico Proven 3.7 432 51.3 0.33 39.1 1.72 3.08
Probable 4.0 362 46.8 0.32 41.2 1.24 2.06
Dolores Mexico Proven 41.6 27 36.1 0.77 1,034.9
Probable 22.5 25 17.9 0.65 472.4
La Bolsa Mexico Proven 9.5 10 3.1 0.67 203.0
Probable 6.2 7 1.4 0.57 113.1
Manantial Espejo Argentina Proven 2.2 111 8.0 1.17 84.4
Probable 0.5 244 3.8 3.32 52.2
San Vicente (95%) (3) Bolivia Proven 2.0 464 29.4 N/A 0.46 0.39 3.00
Probable 0.5 531 9.2 N/A 0.56 0.45 2.52
Total (4) Proven +
Probable
107.0 83 285.8 0.70 2,040.3 0.43 1.36 3.06
37 May 24, 2017
(1) Prices used to estimate mineral reserves for 2016 were $18.50 per ounce of silver, $1,300 per ounce of gold, $2,200 per tonne of zinc, $2,000 per tonne of
lead, and $5,000 per tonne of copper, except at Manantial Espejo where $17.00 per ounce of silver and $1,200 per ounce of gold were used for planned
2017 production, reverting to $18.50 per ounce of silver and $1,300 per ounce of gold thereafter. Metal prices used for La Bolsa were $14.00 per ounce of
silver and $825 per ounce of gold.
(2) Mineral reserve estimates were prepared under the supervision of, or were reviewed by, Christopher Emerson, FAusIMM, Vice President Business
Development and Geology and Martin G. Wafforn, P.Eng., Senior Vice President Technical Services and Process Optimization, each of whom are Qualified
Persons as that term is defined in National Instrument 43-101 (“NI 43-101).
(3) This information represents the portion of mineral reserves attributable to Pan American based on its ownership interest in the operating entity as indicated.
(4) Totals may not add up due to rounding.
38. 38
All Pan American Silver Measured and Indicated Resources (1)(2)
Property Location Category Tonnes (Mt) Ag g/t Au g/t Zn% Pb% Cu%
Huaron Peru Measured 2.2 165 2.93 1.57 0.27
Indicated 1.7 164 2.99 1.56 0.33
Morococha (92.3%)(3) Peru Measured 0.4 161 3.31 1.09 0.25
Indicated 1.1 127 3.26 0.93 0.56
La Colorada Mexico Measured 0.5 206 0.31 0.85 0.45
Indicated 2.0 200 0.18 0.63 0.39
Dolores Mexico Measured 1.9 13 0.22
Indicated 3.2 24 0.43
La Bolsa Mexico Measured 1.4 11 0.90
Indicated 4.5 9 0.50
Manantial Espejo Argentina Measured 0.1 125 1.65
Indicated 0.4 207 2.04
San Vicente (95%)(3) Bolivia Measured 0.8 202 2.45 0.14 0.30
Indicated 0.1 194 2.30 0.17 0.33
Navidad Argentina Measured 15.4 137 1.44 0.10
Indicated 139.8 126 0.79 0.04
Pico Machay Argentina Measured 4.7 0.91
Indicated 5.9 0.67
Calcatreu Argentina Measured
Indicated 8.0 26 2.63
Total (4) Measured +
Indicated
194.0 118 1.11 2.32 0.86 0.06
Notes:
(1) Prices used to estimate mineral resources for 2016 were $18.50 per ounce of silver, $1,300 per ounce of gold, $2,200 per tonne of zinc, $2,000 per tonne of lead, and
$5,000 per tonne of copper, except at Dolores and Manantial Espejo, where $25.00 per ounce of silver and $1,400 per ounce of gold were used. Metal prices used for La
Bolsa were $14.00 per ounce of silver and $825 per ounce of gold. Metal prices for Navidad were $12.52 per ounce of silver and $1,100 per tonne of lead. Metal prices
used for Calcatreu were $12.50 per ounce of silver and $650 per ounce of gold.
(2) Mineral resource estimates were prepared under the supervision of, or were reviewed by, Christopher Emerson, FAusIMM, Vice President Business Development and
Geology and Martin G. Wafforn, P.Eng., Senior Vice President Technical Services and Process Optimization, each of whom are Qualified Persons as that term is defined in
National Instrument 43-101 (“NI 43-101).
(3) This information represents the portion of mineral resources attributable to Pan American based on its ownership interest in the operating entity as indicated.
(4) Totals may not add up due to rounding.
39. All Pan American Silver Inferred Resources(1)(2)
39
Property Location Category Tonnes (Mt) Ag g/t Au g/t Zn% Pb% Cu%
Huaron Peru Inferred 6.2 164 2.81 1.56 0.34
Morococha (92.3%)(3) Peru Inferred 3.9 214 3.58 1.30 0.29
La Colorada Mexico Inferred 1.8 313 0.35 4.58 2.65
Dolores Mexico Inferred 1.7 37 1.01
La Bolsa Mexico Inferred 13.7 8 0.51
Manantial Espejo Argentina Inferred 0.5 211 2.60
San Vicente (95%)(3) Bolivia Inferred 2.8 330 2.42 0.33 0.28
Navidad Argentina Inferred 45.9 81 0.57 0.02
Pico Machay Argentina Inferred 23.9 0.58
Calcatreu Argentina Inferred 3.4 17 2.06
Total (4) Inferred 103.7 92 0.70 2.83 0.77 0.08
Notes:
(1) Prices used to estimate mineral resources for 2016 were $18.50 per ounce of silver, $1,300 per ounce of gold, $2,000 per tonne of lead, $2,200 per tonne of zinc, and
$5,000 per tonne of copper, except at Dolores and Manantial Espejo, where $25.00 per ounce of silver and $1,400 per ounce of gold were used. Metal prices used for La
Bolsa were $14.00 per ounce of silver and $825 per ounce of gold. Metal prices for Navidad were $12.52 per ounce of silver and $1,100 per tonne of lead. Metal prices
used for Calcatreu were $12.50 per ounce of silver and $650 per ounce of gold.
(2) Mineral resource estimates were prepared under the supervision of, or were reviewed by, Christopher Emerson, FAusIMM, Vice President Business Development and
Geology and Martin G. Wafforn, P.Eng., Senior Vice President Technical Services and Process Optimization, each of whom are Qualified Persons as that term is defined in
National Instrument 43-101 (“NI 43-101).
(3) This information represents the portion of mineral resources attributable to Pan American based on its ownership interest in the operating entity as indicated.
(4) Totals may not add up due to rounding.
40. Views on the silver market (1)
• Global silver production declined in 2016 for the first time since 2002
• Industrial demand represents just under half of the total demand for silver
• Growing demand through the use of technology, electronics and renewable sources of power
• Demand for photovoltaic applications rose 34% in 2016 vs 2015 due to increase in global solar
panel installations. Photovoltaics industry now represents 14% of silver’s industrial demand, up
from only 1% a decade ago.
• Real interest rates in the U.S. likely to remain low in 2017, despite expected monetary tightening
• US GDP growth constrained by high government debt, limiting government’s scope for new round of
fiscal stimulus
• Inflationary pressures are starting to build
40 May 24, 2017
(1) Sources include: Bloomberg Metals Focus December, 2016 and GFMS, Thomson Reuters / The Silver Institute 2017
Factors support continued demand for silver for both industrial applications and
as a safe-haven asset.