5. Batch
Continuous
Job ShopBatchRepetitive/
AssemblyContinuousDescriptionCustomized
goods or
servicesSemi-
standardized
goods or
servicesStandardized
goods or
servicesHighly standardized
Goods or servicesAdvantagesAble to handle a
wide variety
of workFlexibility; easy
to add or change products or servicesLow unit
cost, high volume, efficientVery efficient, very
high volumeDisadvantagesSlow, high cost
per unit,
complex
planning and
schedulingModerate cost
per unit,
moderate
scheduling
complexityLow flexibility,
high cost of downtimeVery rigid, lack of
57. 2. With respect to grading, The instructor really looks for 2
things: citations and substance. I encourage you to include cites
and information from scholarly and/or peer-reviewed sources in
addition to the course text (Stevenson, W. (2018). Operations
management (13th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Irwin.
ISBN-13:9781259667473)
Otherwise, my potential for points is reduced. It indicates you
have read the course materials and searched far and wide for
theories, statistics, and facts to address the issue at hand. I
encourage you to paraphrase these sources. Convert the content
into your own words rather than using direct quotes. This
improves the synthesis of information, and it makes the writing
more closely resemble your own style.
In addition to scholarly citations, a substantive assignment is
one that not only answers the question but advances the
discussion. Please, do more than is expected.
· The writer must apply APA style guidelines.
· Support your submission with:
1. Course material concepts, principles, and theories from the
textbook and Use it in the references (Stevenson, W. (2018).
Operations management (13th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw -
Hill Irwin. ISBN-13:9781259667473)
2. At least Three scholarly, peer-reviewed journal articles such
as:
2.1 Rezagholi, M. (2019). Demands for multidimensional
information on the work environment: A methodological
framework for regular studies. Work, 63(1), 9–20.
2.2 Korkulu, S., & Bona, K. (2019). Ergonomics as a social
component of sustainable lot-sizing: A review. Periodica
Polytechnica: Social and Management Sciences, 27(1), 1–8.
2.3 Beke, E., Horvath, R., & Takacs-Gyorgy, K. (2020).
Industry 4.0 and Current Competencies. Our Economy (Nase
Gospodarstvo), 66(4), 63–70. https://doi.org/10.2478/ngoe-
58. 2020-0024
· Be 2 pages in length, does not include the title page, abstract,
conclusion and required reference page, which are never a part
of the minimum content requirements.
Processes, Facilities, and Work Systems
Business processes are important to communicate an
organization’s best practices as they leverage themselves
against competitors. Some benefits of business processes are
that in the long run gains may be realized in cost reduction,
meeting customers’ expectations, and streamlining business
operations. Business process management then focuses on a
workflow that may hinder good performance.
Address the following requirements:
1. Identify a business process for which there is not yet a
workflow diagram, explain the situation, and devise a workflow
to address the problem
2. Defend your workflow and identify any areas of concern that
may hinder successful implementation and a proposed remedy to
that concern.
Thank you for your support
MGT
-
5
30
:
Operation Management
59. (
Processes, Facilities, and Work Systems
)
Module 0
7
Regulations
:
·
GRADING EXPECTATIONS
:
1.
I recommend that you use the grading rubric to shape your work
product (
Attached
).
2.
With respect to
grading, The instructor really looks for 2 things:
citations
60. and substance
. I
encourage you to include cites and information from
scholarly and/or peer
-
reviewed sources in
addition to the course text
(
Stevenson
, W. (2018). Operations management (13th ed.). New
York, NY: McGraw
-
Hill Irwin. ISBN
-
13:9781259667473)
Otherwise
, my
potential for points is reduced. It
indicates you have read the course materials
and searched far and wide for theories, statistics, and facts
to address the issue at hand.
I encourage
you to paraphrase these sources. Convert the content into your
own wor
ds rather than using direct
quotes
. This improves the synthesis of information, and it makes the
writing more closely resemble
your own style.
61. In addition to
scholarly citations, a substantive assignment is one that not only
answers the
question but adv
ances the discussion. Please, do more than is expected.
·
The writer must apply
APA style guidelines
.
·
Support your submission with:
1.
Course material concepts, principles, and theories from the
textbook and
Use
it in the
references
(Stevenson, W. (2018). Operations management (13th ed.). New
York, NY:
McGraw
-
Hill Irwin. ISBN
62. -
13:9781259667473)
2.
At least
Three
scholarly, peer
-
reviewed journal articles such as:
2.1
Rezagholi, M. (2019). Demands for multidimensional
information on the
work
environment: A methodological framework for regular studies.
Work, 63(1), 9
–
20.
2.2
Korkulu, S., & Bona, K. (2019). Ergonomics as a social
component of sustainable lot
-
sizing: A review. Periodica Polytechnica: Social and
Management Sciences, 27(1), 1
–
8.
63. 2.3
B
eke, E., Horvath, R., & Takacs
-
Gyorgy, K. (2020). Industry 4.0 and Current
Competencies. Our Economy (Nase Gospodarstvo), 66(4), 63
–
70.
https://doi.org/10.2478/ngoe
-
2020
-
0024
·
Be
2
pages
in length,
does not include the title
page, abstract, conclusion and
required
reference page,
which are never a part of the minimum content requirements.
MGT-530: Operation Management (Processes, Facilities, and
Work Systems)
Module 07
64. Regulations:
NS :
1. I recommend that you use the grading rubric to shape your
work product (Attached).
2. With respect to grading, The instructor really looks for 2
things: citations and substance. I
encourage you to include cites and information from scholarly
and/or peer-reviewed sources in
addition to the course text (Stevenson, W. (2018). Operations
management (13th ed.). New
York, NY: McGraw-Hill Irwin. ISBN-13:9781259667473)
Otherwise, my potential for points is reduced. It indicates you
have read the course materials
and searched far and wide for theories, statistics, and facts to
address the issue at hand. I encourage
you to paraphrase these sources. Convert the content into your
own words rather than using direct
quotes. This improves the synthesis of information, and it
makes the writing more closely resemble
your own style.
In addition to scholarly citations, a substantive assignment is
one that not only answers the
question but advances the discussion. Please, do more than is
expected.
The writer must apply APA style guidelines.
1. Course material concepts, principles, and theories from the
textbook and Use it in the
references (Stevenson, W. (2018). Operations management (13th
ed.). New York, NY:
McGraw-Hill Irwin. ISBN-13:9781259667473)
2. At least Three scholarly, peer-reviewed journal articles such
65. as:
2.1 Rezagholi, M. (2019). Demands for multidimensional
information on the work
environment: A methodological framework for regular studies.
Work, 63(1), 9–20.
2.2 Korkulu, S., & Bona, K. (2019). Ergonomics as a social
component of sustainable lot-
sizing: A review. Periodica Polytechnica: Social and
Management Sciences, 27(1), 1–8.
2.3 Beke, E., Horvath, R., & Takacs-Gyorgy, K. (2020).
Industry 4.0 and Current
Competencies. Our Economy (Nase Gospodarstvo), 66(4), 63–
70.
https://doi.org/10.2478/ngoe-2020-0024
conclusion and required
reference page, which are never a part of the minimum content
requirements.
SEU Discussion Board Rubric
Meets
Expectation
Approaches
Expectation
Below
Expectation
Limited
Evidence
66. No
Evidence
Content, Research, and Analysis
2 Points 1.5 Points 1 Point .5 Points 0 Points
Content Meets Expectation
- Demonstrates
excellent
knowledge of
concepts, skills,
and theories
relevant to topic.
Approaches
Expectation -
Demonstrates fair
knowledge of
concepts, skills,
and theories.
Below Expectation
- Demonstrates
significantly flawed
knowledge of
concepts, skills,
and theories.
Limited Evidence -
Demonstrates poor
or absent
knowledge of
concepts, skills,
and theories.
No Evidence - Did
67. not participate.
2 Points 1.5 Points 1 Point .5 Points 0 Points
Support Meets Expectation
- Statements are
well supported;
posts extend
discussion.
Approaches
Expectation -
Statements are
partially
supported; posts
may extend
discussion.
Below Expectation
- Support is
deficient; posts do
not extend
discussion.
Limited Evidence -
Statements are not
supported
No Evidence - Did
not participate.
2 Points 1.5 Points 1 Point .5 Points 0 Points
Writing
Quality
Meets Expectation
68. - Writing is well
organized, clear,
concise, and
focused; no errors.
Approaches
Expectation - Some
significant but not
major errors or
omissions in
writing
organization,
focus, and clarity.
Below Expectation
- Numerous
significant errors
or omissions in
writing
organization,
focus, and clarity.
Limited Evidence -
Numerous errors
or omissions—at
least some
major—in writing
organization,
focus, and clarity.
No Evidence - Did
not participate.
2 Points 1.5 Points 1 Point .5 Points 0 Points
Timelines
s
69. Meets Expectation
- Initial post made
before deadline.
Approaches
Expectation - Initial
post made 1 day
late.
Below Expectation
- Initial post 2 days
late.
Limited Evidence -
Initial post 3 days
late.
No Evidence - Did
not participate.
2 Points 1.5 Points 1 Point .5 Points 0 Points
Quantity Meets Expectation
- Initial post and
two other posts of
substance.
Approaches
Expectation - Initial
post and one other
post of substance.
Below Expectation
- Initial post only.
70. Limited Evidence -
One post of
substance to
colleagues.
No Evidence - Did
not participate.
Total Points Possible: 10