SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 6
Download to read offline
DETERMINATION OF PRE-HOMOGENIZATION FACTOR
03.09.2012
REPORT
Scope
Determination of pre-homogenization factor of limestone homogenization pile
and calculation of layers of limestone and clay piles
Methodology
• Methodology used consists in taking sufficient samples during pile
construction and chemically analyzing all the samples and calculating the
LSF standard deviation. Applying the same logic, we collected sufficient
samples during pile reclaiming to the raw mill silos and chemically analyzed
samples and determined the LSF standard deviation.
• By dividing the LSF standard deviation before pile creation and LSF standard
deviation during consumption we determine the pre-homogenization
factor.
• For determination of the number of layers per pile, we measured for
relatively long periods (up to 3 hours), the time that the stacker needs to
travel from one extreme to the other extreme of the pile. We performed
this exercise for different stacker speeds and calculated the number of
layers for various crusher capacities.
Description of the work
Determination of pre-homogenization factor for limestone pile – preparatory work
- On 23 August 2012, during construction of pile A, since the beginning of the
pile, we took spot samples each hour from 09:00 to 21:00.
- The samples were taken from the belt conveyor right after the crusher by
crash stopping it (pulling rope switch). We attempted to take as a
representative sample as possible by taking the whole cross section of the
belt conveyor for about 30cm length. Then the spot samples were taken to
laboratory for chemical analysis.
1 | P a g e
DETERMINATION OF PRE-HOMOGENIZATION FACTOR
03.09.2012
- On 24 August 2012 we continued sample taking until the pile was filled up.
- On 27 August 2012 we took spot samples when raw mill was operating and
the samples were taken directly from the limestone feeder chute. The
samples were taken every 2 hours and later sent to laboratory for chemical
analysis.
- Sample taking from limestone weight feeder continued for 2 more days
until the pile was consumed and changed to new pile.
Determination of number of layers for limestone and clay piles
Limestone pile
- On 17 August 2012 we measured the time that needs the stacker to create
one layer, while the stacker speed was 30% and then while stacker speed
was 40%. Then we calculated how many layers the stacker can create until
the pile is filled up. We measured the time during construction of pile A.
- On 21 August 2012 we performed the same exercise on LIMESTONE
STORAGE for pile B
For PILE A:
While stacker speed is 30 % it takes 8’30” to create one layer and for
stacker speed 40 % it takes 6’30” to create one layer.
- While knowing that:
Q= 20 000ton; q=650 t/h;
For stacker speed 30% we have the results that stacker create 210 layers.
For stacker speed 40% we have the results that stacker create 270 layers.
For PILE B:
While stacker speed is 30 % it takes 7’8” to create one layer and for stacker
speed 40 % it takes 5’8” to create one layer.
- While knowing that:
Q= 20 000ton; q=650 t/h;
2 | P a g e
DETERMINATION OF PRE-HOMOGENIZATION FACTOR
03.09.2012
For stacker speed 30% we have the results that stacker create 240 layers.
For stacker speed 40% we have the results that stacker create 300 layers.
Capacity Stacker speed (%)
t/h 30 40
Pile A (650) 210 270
Pile B (650) 240 300
Flysch pile
- On 29 August 2012 we measured the time that needs the stacker to create
one layer. We measured for a period of 3 hours.
- After calculation we have the results that stacker needs 3’26” to create one
layer.
While knowing that:
Q= 4000ton; q=217 t/h; t=3’26”
For stacker speed 50%we have the results that stacker create 322 layers.
- On 30 August 2012 we measure the time that needs stacker to create one
layer, while the stacker speed is 55 % and 60 %.And the results are for
stacker speed 55 % it takes 3’07” to create one layer and for stacker speed
60 % it takes 2’52” to create one layer.
- We measured the time that needs stacker to create one layer for different
speeds. In the table below we have the calculation about the numbers of
layers for a pile for different capacity, different times and different stacker
speeds.
3 | P a g e
DETERMINATION OF PRE-HOMOGENIZATION FACTOR
03.09.2012
Capacity
t/h
Stacker speed (%)
50 55 60
210 333 366 398
215 325 357 328
217 322 354 385
220 318 350 380
CALCULATIONS
Determination of LSF standard deviation for limestone pile by using chemical
data of the samples.
According to lab analysis, the average chemical data of the samples before pile
construction are as below (average values and standard deviation):
Moisture SiO2 Al2O3 Fe2O3 CaO MgO K2O Na2O SO3 LSF SM AM
AVE
0.76 1.73 1.11 0.52 53.85 0.44 0.08 0.01 0.44 2614.33 1.14 1.94
STDEV
0.18 0.35 0.14 0.07 0.34 0.00 0.02 0.00 1.51 623.79 0.15 0.07
Meanwhile, the chemical data of the sample during consumption are as follows
(average values and standard deviation):
Moisture SiO2 Al2O3 Fe2O3 CaO MgO K2O Na2O SO3 LSF SM AM
AVE 0.86 1.49 0.89 0.42 54.43 0.43 0.02 0.01 0.31 1526.65 1.14 2.10
STDEV 0.60 0.28 0.18 0.08 0.54 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.01 560.23 0.01 0.05
By dividing the standard deviation before and after the pile creation we get the
pre-homogenization factor (HFactor):
4 | P a g e
DETERMINATION OF PRE-HOMOGENIZATION FACTOR
03.09.2012
Hfactor=STDEV before pile construction/STDEV during
consumption=623.79/560.23=1.11
CONCLUSIONS
1. The most important factors that influenced the low homogenization factor are:
a) Preparation of the representative sample. Lack of an appropriate crusher
just for raw materials means the amount of sample and pre-mixing of the
sample to take a representative sample left a lot of room for error.
b) The amount of sample should be increased in order to be sufficiently
representative.
c) The point where we took samples during the consumption should be the
same with the point we took samples before construction of the piles (it
mean to take samples by stopping the belt conveyer before reaching the
limestone silo).
2. The number of layers on pile on limestone storage it’s too low to achieve
appropriate homogenization.
3. For not too high capacity (lower than 210t/h) the actual stacker speed (50 %)
achieves sufficient number of layers at the clay pile.
4. Target of layers in both piles A and B can be achieved if:
a) We increase stacker speed where applicable
b) We decrease the capacity of the crusher within acceptable values.
SUGGESTIONS
• We suggest repeating the test by taking into consideration the findings in
the conclusions above.
• To perform the test for flysch pile as well to have a picture of the pre-
homogenization achieved.
• To increase stacker speed min 55% for Flysch
5 | P a g e
DETERMINATION OF PRE-HOMOGENIZATION FACTOR
03.09.2012
• To iIncrease stacker speed min 50% for Limestone
Prepared by
Doris BULKU
Bachelor of Geo-Mining Engineering
6 | P a g e

More Related Content

What's hot (20)

geopolymer concrete
geopolymer concretegeopolymer concrete
geopolymer concrete
 
Hydration of cement
Hydration of cementHydration of cement
Hydration of cement
 
Quality Control- Timber & Structural Steel
Quality Control- Timber & Structural SteelQuality Control- Timber & Structural Steel
Quality Control- Timber & Structural Steel
 
Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT)
Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT)Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT)
Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT)
 
Cement Industry and Audit Presentation
Cement Industry and Audit PresentationCement Industry and Audit Presentation
Cement Industry and Audit Presentation
 
Cement manufacturing process
Cement manufacturing processCement manufacturing process
Cement manufacturing process
 
Geo Polymer Concrete
Geo Polymer ConcreteGeo Polymer Concrete
Geo Polymer Concrete
 
Cement- presentation
Cement- presentationCement- presentation
Cement- presentation
 
Surface & tin defects
Surface & tin defectsSurface & tin defects
Surface & tin defects
 
Composite material(properties and applications)
Composite material(properties and applications)Composite material(properties and applications)
Composite material(properties and applications)
 
Plastic waste
Plastic wastePlastic waste
Plastic waste
 
civil datas for estimate
civil datas for estimatecivil datas for estimate
civil datas for estimate
 
Manufacturing and Quality Control of Cement.
Manufacturing and Quality Control of Cement.Manufacturing and Quality Control of Cement.
Manufacturing and Quality Control of Cement.
 
4 Cracks in Concrete.pptx
4 Cracks in Concrete.pptx4 Cracks in Concrete.pptx
4 Cracks in Concrete.pptx
 
CEMENT
CEMENTCEMENT
CEMENT
 
What is the Difference Between FE 500 & FE 500D TMT Bar?
What is the Difference Between FE 500 & FE 500D TMT Bar?What is the Difference Between FE 500 & FE 500D TMT Bar?
What is the Difference Between FE 500 & FE 500D TMT Bar?
 
Cement
CementCement
Cement
 
Cement
CementCement
Cement
 
Fineness air permeability final (1)
Fineness air permeability final (1)Fineness air permeability final (1)
Fineness air permeability final (1)
 
Concrete structure
Concrete structureConcrete structure
Concrete structure
 

Viewers also liked

اكتب سيرتك الذاتية باحتراف
اكتب سيرتك الذاتية باحترافاكتب سيرتك الذاتية باحتراف
اكتب سيرتك الذاتية باحترافAhmed sayed
 
السيرة الذاتية صفاء عميد معهد الحاسبات الالية فقط 2014
السيرة الذاتية صفاء عميد معهد الحاسبات الالية  فقط 2014السيرة الذاتية صفاء عميد معهد الحاسبات الالية  فقط 2014
السيرة الذاتية صفاء عميد معهد الحاسبات الالية فقط 2014Safaa Sayed
 
السيرة الذاتية c.v
السيرة الذاتية c.v السيرة الذاتية c.v
السيرة الذاتية c.v RAmy Bakheet
 
Resume rukhsana
Resume rukhsanaResume rukhsana
Resume rukhsanarukhs26
 
TEDx Manchester: AI & The Future of Work
TEDx Manchester: AI & The Future of WorkTEDx Manchester: AI & The Future of Work
TEDx Manchester: AI & The Future of WorkVolker Hirsch
 

Viewers also liked (14)

SamarDiab CV
SamarDiab CVSamarDiab CV
SamarDiab CV
 
shaban2015 cv arbic
shaban2015 cv arbicshaban2015 cv arbic
shaban2015 cv arbic
 
اكتب سيرتك الذاتية باحتراف
اكتب سيرتك الذاتية باحترافاكتب سيرتك الذاتية باحتراف
اكتب سيرتك الذاتية باحتراف
 
CV new 2016
CV new 2016CV new 2016
CV new 2016
 
Arabic c.v
Arabic c.vArabic c.v
Arabic c.v
 
السيرة الذاتية صفاء عميد معهد الحاسبات الالية فقط 2014
السيرة الذاتية صفاء عميد معهد الحاسبات الالية  فقط 2014السيرة الذاتية صفاء عميد معهد الحاسبات الالية  فقط 2014
السيرة الذاتية صفاء عميد معهد الحاسبات الالية فقط 2014
 
السيرة الذاتية c.v
السيرة الذاتية c.v السيرة الذاتية c.v
السيرة الذاتية c.v
 
Nada CV
Nada CVNada CV
Nada CV
 
Marwa Darwesh CV
Marwa Darwesh CVMarwa Darwesh CV
Marwa Darwesh CV
 
Resume rukhsana
Resume rukhsanaResume rukhsana
Resume rukhsana
 
sadia CV linkedin
sadia CV linkedinsadia CV linkedin
sadia CV linkedin
 
Resume of Ayeesha Azad (PDF)
Resume of Ayeesha Azad (PDF)Resume of Ayeesha Azad (PDF)
Resume of Ayeesha Azad (PDF)
 
Komal_CV new
Komal_CV newKomal_CV new
Komal_CV new
 
TEDx Manchester: AI & The Future of Work
TEDx Manchester: AI & The Future of WorkTEDx Manchester: AI & The Future of Work
TEDx Manchester: AI & The Future of Work
 

Similar to Pre-homogenization factor

Drilling efficiency optimization at hassai site
Drilling efficiency optimization at hassai siteDrilling efficiency optimization at hassai site
Drilling efficiency optimization at hassai siteAhmad Elsir
 
IRJET-Testing of Fluidized Bed Combustor for Foundry Sand Reclamation
IRJET-Testing of Fluidized Bed Combustor for Foundry Sand ReclamationIRJET-Testing of Fluidized Bed Combustor for Foundry Sand Reclamation
IRJET-Testing of Fluidized Bed Combustor for Foundry Sand ReclamationIRJET Journal
 
BORED pile and pile cap design.ppt
BORED pile and pile cap design.pptBORED pile and pile cap design.ppt
BORED pile and pile cap design.pptkarsapersada
 
Compressive Strength of Hydraulic Cement Mortar | Jameel Academy
Compressive Strength of Hydraulic Cement Mortar | Jameel AcademyCompressive Strength of Hydraulic Cement Mortar | Jameel Academy
Compressive Strength of Hydraulic Cement Mortar | Jameel AcademyJameel Academy
 
Time dependent behaviour of a class f fly ash-based geopolymer concrete
Time dependent behaviour of a class f fly ash-based geopolymer concreteTime dependent behaviour of a class f fly ash-based geopolymer concrete
Time dependent behaviour of a class f fly ash-based geopolymer concreteeSAT Publishing House
 
Increased Pulverizer Performance with Loesche’s High Efficiency Dynamic Class...
Increased Pulverizer Performance with Loesche’s High Efficiency Dynamic Class...Increased Pulverizer Performance with Loesche’s High Efficiency Dynamic Class...
Increased Pulverizer Performance with Loesche’s High Efficiency Dynamic Class...LOESCHE
 
Self compacting concrete Mix
Self compacting concrete MixSelf compacting concrete Mix
Self compacting concrete MixHafizullah Sadat
 
Final project ppt
Final project pptFinal project ppt
Final project pptAkhil Vas
 
Deswik-IPCC2013 Presentation-Scenario based analysis of IPCC trade-offs
Deswik-IPCC2013 Presentation-Scenario based analysis of IPCC trade-offsDeswik-IPCC2013 Presentation-Scenario based analysis of IPCC trade-offs
Deswik-IPCC2013 Presentation-Scenario based analysis of IPCC trade-offsDeswik
 
Precast Six lane flyover project
Precast Six lane flyover projectPrecast Six lane flyover project
Precast Six lane flyover projectKriShna Sharma
 
EXPERIMENTAL BEHAVIOUR OF SELF COMPACTING CONCRETE USING GGBS WITH PARTIAL RE...
EXPERIMENTAL BEHAVIOUR OF SELF COMPACTING CONCRETE USING GGBS WITH PARTIAL RE...EXPERIMENTAL BEHAVIOUR OF SELF COMPACTING CONCRETE USING GGBS WITH PARTIAL RE...
EXPERIMENTAL BEHAVIOUR OF SELF COMPACTING CONCRETE USING GGBS WITH PARTIAL RE...Ijripublishers Ijri
 
IRJET- Roughness Coefficient of Alkali Activated Mineral based Concrete C...
IRJET-  	  Roughness Coefficient of Alkali Activated Mineral based Concrete C...IRJET-  	  Roughness Coefficient of Alkali Activated Mineral based Concrete C...
IRJET- Roughness Coefficient of Alkali Activated Mineral based Concrete C...IRJET Journal
 
Coal quality sampling &; preparation as per indian standard
Coal quality  sampling &; preparation as per indian standardCoal quality  sampling &; preparation as per indian standard
Coal quality sampling &; preparation as per indian standardprakash deshmukh
 
KHRI- Webinar( 23-05-2020)-Analysis of Pile Foundations under Earthquake Case...
KHRI- Webinar( 23-05-2020)-Analysis of Pile Foundations under Earthquake Case...KHRI- Webinar( 23-05-2020)-Analysis of Pile Foundations under Earthquake Case...
KHRI- Webinar( 23-05-2020)-Analysis of Pile Foundations under Earthquake Case...SandipPaul46
 
koyesha hydropower.pptx
koyesha hydropower.pptxkoyesha hydropower.pptx
koyesha hydropower.pptxYonatanFikadu
 

Similar to Pre-homogenization factor (20)

Drilling efficiency optimization at hassai site
Drilling efficiency optimization at hassai siteDrilling efficiency optimization at hassai site
Drilling efficiency optimization at hassai site
 
IRJET-Testing of Fluidized Bed Combustor for Foundry Sand Reclamation
IRJET-Testing of Fluidized Bed Combustor for Foundry Sand ReclamationIRJET-Testing of Fluidized Bed Combustor for Foundry Sand Reclamation
IRJET-Testing of Fluidized Bed Combustor for Foundry Sand Reclamation
 
BORED pile and pile cap design.ppt
BORED pile and pile cap design.pptBORED pile and pile cap design.ppt
BORED pile and pile cap design.ppt
 
Compressive Strength of Hydraulic Cement Mortar | Jameel Academy
Compressive Strength of Hydraulic Cement Mortar | Jameel AcademyCompressive Strength of Hydraulic Cement Mortar | Jameel Academy
Compressive Strength of Hydraulic Cement Mortar | Jameel Academy
 
Shovel and Dumper Combinatio by Auqib Javed.pptx
Shovel and Dumper Combinatio by Auqib Javed.pptxShovel and Dumper Combinatio by Auqib Javed.pptx
Shovel and Dumper Combinatio by Auqib Javed.pptx
 
Time dependent behaviour of a class f fly ash-based geopolymer concrete
Time dependent behaviour of a class f fly ash-based geopolymer concreteTime dependent behaviour of a class f fly ash-based geopolymer concrete
Time dependent behaviour of a class f fly ash-based geopolymer concrete
 
Chap 5 (1)
Chap 5 (1)Chap 5 (1)
Chap 5 (1)
 
Increased Pulverizer Performance with Loesche’s High Efficiency Dynamic Class...
Increased Pulverizer Performance with Loesche’s High Efficiency Dynamic Class...Increased Pulverizer Performance with Loesche’s High Efficiency Dynamic Class...
Increased Pulverizer Performance with Loesche’s High Efficiency Dynamic Class...
 
Self compacting concrete Mix
Self compacting concrete MixSelf compacting concrete Mix
Self compacting concrete Mix
 
Final project ppt
Final project pptFinal project ppt
Final project ppt
 
Deswik-IPCC2013 Presentation-Scenario based analysis of IPCC trade-offs
Deswik-IPCC2013 Presentation-Scenario based analysis of IPCC trade-offsDeswik-IPCC2013 Presentation-Scenario based analysis of IPCC trade-offs
Deswik-IPCC2013 Presentation-Scenario based analysis of IPCC trade-offs
 
Precast Six lane flyover project
Precast Six lane flyover projectPrecast Six lane flyover project
Precast Six lane flyover project
 
EXPERIMENTAL BEHAVIOUR OF SELF COMPACTING CONCRETE USING GGBS WITH PARTIAL RE...
EXPERIMENTAL BEHAVIOUR OF SELF COMPACTING CONCRETE USING GGBS WITH PARTIAL RE...EXPERIMENTAL BEHAVIOUR OF SELF COMPACTING CONCRETE USING GGBS WITH PARTIAL RE...
EXPERIMENTAL BEHAVIOUR OF SELF COMPACTING CONCRETE USING GGBS WITH PARTIAL RE...
 
6491 samplingflyash
6491 samplingflyash6491 samplingflyash
6491 samplingflyash
 
1Malaysia Cabin
1Malaysia Cabin1Malaysia Cabin
1Malaysia Cabin
 
IRJET- Roughness Coefficient of Alkali Activated Mineral based Concrete C...
IRJET-  	  Roughness Coefficient of Alkali Activated Mineral based Concrete C...IRJET-  	  Roughness Coefficient of Alkali Activated Mineral based Concrete C...
IRJET- Roughness Coefficient of Alkali Activated Mineral based Concrete C...
 
Coal quality sampling &; preparation as per indian standard
Coal quality  sampling &; preparation as per indian standardCoal quality  sampling &; preparation as per indian standard
Coal quality sampling &; preparation as per indian standard
 
KHRI- Webinar( 23-05-2020)-Analysis of Pile Foundations under Earthquake Case...
KHRI- Webinar( 23-05-2020)-Analysis of Pile Foundations under Earthquake Case...KHRI- Webinar( 23-05-2020)-Analysis of Pile Foundations under Earthquake Case...
KHRI- Webinar( 23-05-2020)-Analysis of Pile Foundations under Earthquake Case...
 
Project 1
Project 1Project 1
Project 1
 
koyesha hydropower.pptx
koyesha hydropower.pptxkoyesha hydropower.pptx
koyesha hydropower.pptx
 

Pre-homogenization factor

  • 1. DETERMINATION OF PRE-HOMOGENIZATION FACTOR 03.09.2012 REPORT Scope Determination of pre-homogenization factor of limestone homogenization pile and calculation of layers of limestone and clay piles Methodology • Methodology used consists in taking sufficient samples during pile construction and chemically analyzing all the samples and calculating the LSF standard deviation. Applying the same logic, we collected sufficient samples during pile reclaiming to the raw mill silos and chemically analyzed samples and determined the LSF standard deviation. • By dividing the LSF standard deviation before pile creation and LSF standard deviation during consumption we determine the pre-homogenization factor. • For determination of the number of layers per pile, we measured for relatively long periods (up to 3 hours), the time that the stacker needs to travel from one extreme to the other extreme of the pile. We performed this exercise for different stacker speeds and calculated the number of layers for various crusher capacities. Description of the work Determination of pre-homogenization factor for limestone pile – preparatory work - On 23 August 2012, during construction of pile A, since the beginning of the pile, we took spot samples each hour from 09:00 to 21:00. - The samples were taken from the belt conveyor right after the crusher by crash stopping it (pulling rope switch). We attempted to take as a representative sample as possible by taking the whole cross section of the belt conveyor for about 30cm length. Then the spot samples were taken to laboratory for chemical analysis. 1 | P a g e
  • 2. DETERMINATION OF PRE-HOMOGENIZATION FACTOR 03.09.2012 - On 24 August 2012 we continued sample taking until the pile was filled up. - On 27 August 2012 we took spot samples when raw mill was operating and the samples were taken directly from the limestone feeder chute. The samples were taken every 2 hours and later sent to laboratory for chemical analysis. - Sample taking from limestone weight feeder continued for 2 more days until the pile was consumed and changed to new pile. Determination of number of layers for limestone and clay piles Limestone pile - On 17 August 2012 we measured the time that needs the stacker to create one layer, while the stacker speed was 30% and then while stacker speed was 40%. Then we calculated how many layers the stacker can create until the pile is filled up. We measured the time during construction of pile A. - On 21 August 2012 we performed the same exercise on LIMESTONE STORAGE for pile B For PILE A: While stacker speed is 30 % it takes 8’30” to create one layer and for stacker speed 40 % it takes 6’30” to create one layer. - While knowing that: Q= 20 000ton; q=650 t/h; For stacker speed 30% we have the results that stacker create 210 layers. For stacker speed 40% we have the results that stacker create 270 layers. For PILE B: While stacker speed is 30 % it takes 7’8” to create one layer and for stacker speed 40 % it takes 5’8” to create one layer. - While knowing that: Q= 20 000ton; q=650 t/h; 2 | P a g e
  • 3. DETERMINATION OF PRE-HOMOGENIZATION FACTOR 03.09.2012 For stacker speed 30% we have the results that stacker create 240 layers. For stacker speed 40% we have the results that stacker create 300 layers. Capacity Stacker speed (%) t/h 30 40 Pile A (650) 210 270 Pile B (650) 240 300 Flysch pile - On 29 August 2012 we measured the time that needs the stacker to create one layer. We measured for a period of 3 hours. - After calculation we have the results that stacker needs 3’26” to create one layer. While knowing that: Q= 4000ton; q=217 t/h; t=3’26” For stacker speed 50%we have the results that stacker create 322 layers. - On 30 August 2012 we measure the time that needs stacker to create one layer, while the stacker speed is 55 % and 60 %.And the results are for stacker speed 55 % it takes 3’07” to create one layer and for stacker speed 60 % it takes 2’52” to create one layer. - We measured the time that needs stacker to create one layer for different speeds. In the table below we have the calculation about the numbers of layers for a pile for different capacity, different times and different stacker speeds. 3 | P a g e
  • 4. DETERMINATION OF PRE-HOMOGENIZATION FACTOR 03.09.2012 Capacity t/h Stacker speed (%) 50 55 60 210 333 366 398 215 325 357 328 217 322 354 385 220 318 350 380 CALCULATIONS Determination of LSF standard deviation for limestone pile by using chemical data of the samples. According to lab analysis, the average chemical data of the samples before pile construction are as below (average values and standard deviation): Moisture SiO2 Al2O3 Fe2O3 CaO MgO K2O Na2O SO3 LSF SM AM AVE 0.76 1.73 1.11 0.52 53.85 0.44 0.08 0.01 0.44 2614.33 1.14 1.94 STDEV 0.18 0.35 0.14 0.07 0.34 0.00 0.02 0.00 1.51 623.79 0.15 0.07 Meanwhile, the chemical data of the sample during consumption are as follows (average values and standard deviation): Moisture SiO2 Al2O3 Fe2O3 CaO MgO K2O Na2O SO3 LSF SM AM AVE 0.86 1.49 0.89 0.42 54.43 0.43 0.02 0.01 0.31 1526.65 1.14 2.10 STDEV 0.60 0.28 0.18 0.08 0.54 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.01 560.23 0.01 0.05 By dividing the standard deviation before and after the pile creation we get the pre-homogenization factor (HFactor): 4 | P a g e
  • 5. DETERMINATION OF PRE-HOMOGENIZATION FACTOR 03.09.2012 Hfactor=STDEV before pile construction/STDEV during consumption=623.79/560.23=1.11 CONCLUSIONS 1. The most important factors that influenced the low homogenization factor are: a) Preparation of the representative sample. Lack of an appropriate crusher just for raw materials means the amount of sample and pre-mixing of the sample to take a representative sample left a lot of room for error. b) The amount of sample should be increased in order to be sufficiently representative. c) The point where we took samples during the consumption should be the same with the point we took samples before construction of the piles (it mean to take samples by stopping the belt conveyer before reaching the limestone silo). 2. The number of layers on pile on limestone storage it’s too low to achieve appropriate homogenization. 3. For not too high capacity (lower than 210t/h) the actual stacker speed (50 %) achieves sufficient number of layers at the clay pile. 4. Target of layers in both piles A and B can be achieved if: a) We increase stacker speed where applicable b) We decrease the capacity of the crusher within acceptable values. SUGGESTIONS • We suggest repeating the test by taking into consideration the findings in the conclusions above. • To perform the test for flysch pile as well to have a picture of the pre- homogenization achieved. • To increase stacker speed min 55% for Flysch 5 | P a g e
  • 6. DETERMINATION OF PRE-HOMOGENIZATION FACTOR 03.09.2012 • To iIncrease stacker speed min 50% for Limestone Prepared by Doris BULKU Bachelor of Geo-Mining Engineering 6 | P a g e