A Summary Of The Clash Of Civilizations

A Summary Of The Clash Of Civilizations
Cultural differences among humankind have long existed and can be traced down to the early beginnings of human race. Even nowadays conflicts
between civilization exist without the necessity of there being confrontation between each other. In "The Clash of Civilizations?", Samuel P.
Huntington hypothesizes that the great differences between humankind will not arise from differences in ideology or economy but from differences
between cultures; hence, the battle lines of the future will be those that separate civilizations and no longer first, second or third world countries.
Huntington describes a civilization as one that is "the highest cultural grouping of people and the broadest level of cultural identity people have"
(Huntington). In his perspective, a civilization goes way beyond an ethnic group, a nationality or a religion; instead, it comprises all of this. Among the
eight major civilizations Huntington classifies are: Western, Confucian, Japanese, Islamic, Hindu, Slavic–Orthodox, Latin American and African.The
Clash of Civilizations arises from the idea that culture is paramount; thus, if conflicted it cannot be as easily resolved as conflicts within terms of
ideology or economy. The main differences between civilizations are portrayed through history, language, culture, tradition and religion; all which have
formed over thousands of years and represent each civilization uniquely. As the world continuously evolves, it becomes easier for civilizations to
interact
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

POLI 100 – F10N01 Gabrielle Bishop The Clash of Civilizations: A Summary of Samuel Huntington's controversial Political Analysis and its Critics
"Culture and cultural identities, which at the broadest level are civilizational identities, are shaping patterns of cohesion, disintegration, and conflict in
the post–Cold War World"– Samuel Huntington POLI 100 – F10N01! Gabrielle Bishop In a 1993 article published in Foreign Affairs, Harvard
Professor of Government and Political Scientist Samuel Huntington made a prediction for the 21st century that would go on to be both disputed and
supported by experts around the globe. As the Iron Curtain of ideology of the Cold War had fallen, Huntington theorized that a new "Velvet Curtain" of
...show more content...
However, not all nations have been successful in identifying with one particular culture, Huntington states, referring to Mexico, Turkey, Russia, and
Australia 25. These states, he says, could be described as "torn countries"26; countries which are torn between multiple cultural identities – the tradition
cultural identity they've held, and the new cultural identity they wish to adopt. "A torn country... has a single predominant culture which places it in
one civilization, but its leaders want to shift it to another civilization. They say, in effect, 'We are different peoples and belong in different places'"27.
In "Chapter 7: Core States, Concentric States, and Civilized Order", Huntington states that a small, powerful number of core states will be the centre of
a new structure of civilizations. France and Germany are examples of these states in the European Union. He goes on to describe "core states", the
divide between Western Europe (Protestantism & Catholicism) and Eastern Europe (Orthodox Christianity & Islam), and the lack of a core state in
Islam. In "Part 4: Clashes of Civilizations" (arguably the most important section of the book), Samuel Huntington predicts that "In the emerging world,
the relations between states and groups from different civilizations will not be close, and will often be antagonistic."28 He hypothesizes that the three

On the other hand, defenders of Huntington might argue that his thesis predicted the instability leading to the uprisings, and that his analysis of the
Muslim Arab societies provided information of some important aspects of the Arab Spring, such as causes and driving forces: search for identity;
Muslim political culture; affection and rejection towards the West; and Islam's central role.
This thesis aims to offer a more methodical examination of this debate, and thereby provides an more dispassionate objective comprehensive answer as
toto the relative relation and to the explanatory power of an important global event, the Arab spring, in regards to one of some of the most important
contemporaneous IR debates, tThe clash of Civilizations. The answer that this thesis provides...show more content...
Huntington's Clash of Civilizations
The clash of civilizations was one of the last significant works of Professor Samuel P. Huntington , after long many years of writing in the fields of
international relations and political science. Huntington wrote the Clash of civilization after he witnessed the end of the Cold War, and believed that
international relations after its end would change tremendously due to the war.
Huntington sought a new paradigm that would explain the new global map in a better way than that of current existinged theories. Huntington was not
alone in this attempt, since. otheroOther intellectuals and statesmen have sought to figure out how global politics have changed, and would change;
which new systems and powers will come to play; what would be the driving forces behind global phenomena and trends; and how will policies
change.these changes should bring forth.
There was much controversy regarding those matters, particularly around about the origins of conflict, the traditional role of nation states as the main
actors in global affairs, and the nature of relations between international actors in the era of

I.Introduction
As being stated by Samuel P. Huntington, the Clash of Civilization is a hypothesis in which the primary sources of conflicts in the post–cold war era
are more dominant to the people's cultural and religious identities. Civilization has three attributes which are the objective elements – language, history
religion, customs, and institution; the subjective elements – variable levels of self–identification; and civilization itself is dynamic – they rise and fall,
divide and merge. Dialogue between civilizations are also needed and will give significant impacts for not only both civilizations but also for the
world. This paper would like to discuss and analyze two cases about the possibility of Post–American World Order towards...show more content...
Bibliography
Alverdian, Indra. "Lesson 3 – Globalization and The Clash of Civilizations." Lecture, The Clash of Civilizations and Its International Implications,
President University, Cikarang, Bekasi, Indonesia, 2016.
Huntington, Samuel P. "The Clash of Civilizations?" Foreign Affairs, 2004, 22
–49. Accessed December 11, 2016. http://users.metu.edu.tr/utuba
/Huntington.pdf.
Longworth, Richard C. "Can China Rise Peacefully?" Chicago Council on Global Affairs. Last modified April 8, 2014. https:/
/www.thechicagocouncil.org/event/can–china–rise–peacefully.
Sultanbayeva, Gulmyra S. "Civilization Dialogues: Concord Dialectics Between West and East." Polish Political Science Yearbook 43 (2014), 7
–12.
Accessed December 12, 2016. http://www.marszalek.com.pl/yearbook/docs/43/ppsy2014001.pdf.
Zakaria, Fareed. "Chapter 4: The Challenger." In The Post–American World, 87–128. New York: W.W. Norton, 2008.

In Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of the World Order, Samuel Huntington states "The most important distinctions among peoples are no
longer ideological, political, or economic. They are cultural". This is his main argument throughout this book. New patterns of distinctions and conflict
will occur along boundaries of different cultures. However, patterns of cohesion will be found within the cultural boundaries. Huntington analyzes the
resurgence of post–cold war cultural identities. He does this in order to explain the prevailing and future world order. From Huntington's perspective,
arguments and world views which claim the existence and proliferation of a universal culture can be disregarded. Hunting argues that great divisions
among man and sources of conflict will be cultural.
Huntington's work influenced how the Western and American policymakers view the world. Clash ofCivilization was an expansion from an article he
published in Foreign Affairs journal. It incorporates a hybrid of nationalist, metahistorical, and realist elements. Huntington states that there is a
weakness present in the four paradigms existing in the political world after the Cold War. He views the situation from the view of the West versus the
rest of the world is the current system. Huntington regards this system as weak. He believes that the four paradigms are also incompatible with each
other. Huntington explains the characteristics of a civilization as the broadest cultural entity.

September 11: The Clash of Civilizations Essay
"First, differences among civilizations are not only real; they are basic. Civilizations are differentiated from each other by history, language, culture,
tradition, and, most important, religion" (Huntington 450). On Tuesday September 11, 2001 the unthinkable happened in America. The two World
Trade Centers in New York City, along with the Pentagon in Washington D.C., were struck by airplanes that were hijacked by terrorists. This terrible
tragedy killing thousands of people had a deep impact on the whole nation. Many are confused as to why the United States of America were targeted
instead of any of the other countries in the world. The main reason for the Taliban choosing to attack the United Stated of America on September 11,
2001 is...show more content...
Along with the lack of freedom of speech, people living in these areas are also very poor, making it very hard for them to get respect. "The anger of
being voiceless was often matched by the despair of poverty. [...] Poverty, disappointment, and youth form a potent mix for revolt" (Landers 395).
With all the anger and jealousy built up over the years, these people finally decided it was time to be heard.
Another reason is due to American's freedom of religion. Freedom of religion is granted to every American, stated in the Bill of Right's 1st
Amendment. There are many different ways of viewing God and man. The countries involved with the Taliban are told what to believe in rather than
having the choice to believe what they want to. There are so many ways of viewing religion between people associated with the Taliban and the
United States of America. Samuel Huntington goes into it deeper by stating, "The people of different civilizations have different views on the relations
between God and man, the individual and group, the citizen and the state, parents and children, husband and wife, as well as differing views of the
relative importance of the rights and responsibilities, liberty and authority, equality and hierarchy. These differences are the product of centuries. They
will not soon disappear" (450). Every person in the United States of America has

The Clash Of Civilizations By Samuel Huntington
This essay addresses the question of how, if at all, does the trend of intra–state conflicts among groups that have far outnumbered state vs. state
conflicts, and if that trend in internal conflict within states over the last 20 years supports Samuel Huntington's major hypothesis in his essay "The
Clash of Civilizations." Huntington's main thesis was that "the fundamental source of conflict in this new world will not be primarily ideological or
economic. The great divisions among humankind and the dominating source of conflict will be cultural." This article was written in 1993. We will
run the clock forward 23 years to the present in the year 2016. The first indications after reading his essay was that the author would seem to be
semi–clairvoyant and provided a fairly accurate assessment from an analytical perspective. He was, in my estimation, about 75 percent correct in his
predictions and assessments, and his overall thesis can be supported through a careful documentation of available facts, both then in 1993, and today.
Huntington gives an exposition of three phases of conflict starting in May and October of 1648, when the treaties were signed in the Westphalian cities
of Munster and Osnabruck ending the Thirty Years' War in the Holy Roman Empire, and the Eighty Years' War that was between the Dutch Republic
and Spain. These treaties culminated in what we call the "Peace of Westphalia." Nation state boundaries started to become more prevalent and used in
a more

Clash Of Civilizations Essay examples
The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order by Samuel P. Huntington is an extremely well written and insightful book. Samuel P.
Huntington is the Albert J. Weatherhead III University Professor at Harvard University, director of the John M. Olin Institute for Strategic Studies, the
chairman of the Harvard Academy for International and Area Studies, and the president of the AmericanPolitical Science Association. During the Carter
administration, Huntington was the director of security planning for the National Security Council. He is also the founder and coeditor of the highly
regarded international affairs publication, Foreign Policy.
In 1993 Samuel P. Huntington wrote an article for the respected journalForeign Affairs...show more content...
He emphasizes that although the West is still strong and growing in many areas, other civilizations are growing at a faster rate. Asian civilizations are
booming both economically and in their military strength and the Muslim culture is spreading demographically, while the West is becoming
increasingly preoccupied with its own internal problems such as crime, government deficits, drug abuse, and a declining work ethic. Huntington uses
graphs and charts very effectively in this section of his book to visually depict the decline of the West's population, territory, and economic influence.
Also in this section, the concept of modernization vs. Westernization is discussed. Many cultures desire to become modern, but without the negative
trappings of Western civilization such as the perceived lack of morals and weak work ethic of Westerners, and the primarily Western concept of the
separation between church and state. Modernization was once equated with Westernization but, according to Huntington, this is now not always the
case. His examples include the Japanese and Islamic cultures. In Japan there has been a return to traditional Asian culture due to the prevailing belief
that their economic prosperity is directly linked to their traditional culture and that the problems of the U.S. are linked to our Western culture. Islamic
leaders have expressed similar attitudes as well, and Huntington goes into great detail

More than two decades have passed since Samuel Huntington published his influential article, "the Clash of Civilizations?" (1993). The article
presented a new paradigm for describing global politics in the post–Cold War world. Huntington's framework divided the world into several major
civilizations, and argued that civilization's cultural identity and religions will become the most important driving forces. Civilizations and states'
behaviors, and mostly participation in conflicts, will no longer be driven from ideological or economic forces as they were during in the time of the
cold war era. Moreover, he argued that for the first time the world has become multipolar and multi–civilizational. This (the argument?) shapes
geopolitics at the...show more content...
Initially Rrevolutions were initially seen as a "new version" of the nineteenth century Europe's Spring of Nations or the more contemporary
anti–communist revolutions of 1989 in Eastern Europe . After years of conflict between values of the Western and Islamic civilizations, the same
conflict that Huntington and his critics discuss, some argued, the Muslim Arab world ultimately chose to adopt Western values: human rights, freedom,
and democracy. Thus, they experts who believed that the Arab spring symbolized a chance for democracy and change in the Arab world argued, that
Islam is not in a clash with the West and its values, but rather exists in many clashes within (within what? Within Islam?). the Arab worlditself. Islam
has no role in mobilizing the protestors. Muslim Arab people's will no longer accept their suppressing corrupted illiberal regimes. They Instead, they
chose instead in Western democracy, and so the Muslim–Western dispute is bound to come to an end. Therefore, Huntington's clash of civilizations is
refuted, and it appears that there is no such a clash. (Gropp, 2013; Keck, 2013; Kamali,

вЂњClash of CivilizationsвЂќ Essay examples
Realism is the contrast of the Idealist conception that society can change on the foundation of an idea. The "Clash of Civilizations" by Samuel
Huntington is a brilliant illustration that exhibits the power of ideas that has vastly influenced both foreign policies of countries, but also the discipline
of International Relations. Samuel Huntington's "the clash of civilizations," is based on the hypothesis: "In the post–Cold War world the most
important distinctions among people are not ideological, political, or economic. They are cultural". (Huntington, 1996, p. 21) Huntington recognizes
the significance of the realist approach that the nation states will stay as the most influential actors in international relationships, but he refutes...show
more content...
Huntington depends on Bernard Lewis to demonstrate Islam's history of violence and resentment or Jihadist terrorism (Milani & Gibbons, 2001). He
concludes that "Islam's borders are bloody, and so are its innards" (Huntington 1996, p. 258). Huntington overstates the most pessimistic characteristics
of the connection between Islam and the West that have shaped persistent bitterness in the perception of Muslims and Westerners (Mellon, 2001).
Further, he impugns Muslim states for undue militarization and blames them for Jihadist terrorism, overlooking the crucial fact that the West, the
United States in particular, had initiated the militarization by significantly financing and providing arms to them in the first place (Kepel, 2003).
Although some Muslim countries have subsidized acts of terrorism, I believe that they are not the sole culprits; and there is a great majority of Muslim
countries that have never been involved in terrorism (Testas, 2004). Thus, Huntington's argument that the Islamic nations are central actors in the
Jihadist terrorism doesn't seem to have solid ground and appears that the "clash of civilization" idea, has been built on unsound arguments and sloppy
classification of solid civilizations. Moreover, according to Milani & Gibbons (2001), it would be unfair to generalize about all Islamic countries as
Huntington does in "the clash of civilizations" since they are very diverse in their culture, political structures and economic development. On the

I.Introduction
As being stated by Samuel P. Huntington, the Clash of Civilization is a hypothesis in which the primary sources of conflicts in the post–cold war era
are more dominant to the people's cultural and religious identities. Civilization has three attributes which are the objective elements – language, history
religion, customs, and institution; the subjective elements – variable levels of self–identification; and civilization itself is dynamic – they rise and fall,
divide and merge. Dialogue between civilizations are also needed and will give significant impacts for not only both civilizations but also for the
world. This paper would like to discuss and analyze two cases about the possibility of Post–American World Order towards the potential Dialogue
between Civilizations or the Clash of Civilizations theory; and the contribution of Dialogue between Civilizations towards the management of negative
impact in this globalization era.
II.The Possibility of a Post–American World Order Will Strengthen the Potential for Dialogue Between Civilizations or Increase the Relevancy with
The Clash of Civilizations Hypothesis
The Post–American World Order, a term...show more content...
Huntington instead of strengthen the potential Dialogue between Civilizations. This can be seen by the case above that the U.S. – or mostly known as
the Western Civilizations – is frightened and worried about the rise of China – or known as the Chinese Civilizations. This case will create the clash
between the West and Chinese Civilizations. The clash of civilizations that will be occurred by both the West and Chinese civilizations will be in a
form of the macro–level clash of civilizations where the states from different civilizations compete for economic power, struggle over the control, and
competitively promote their particular political and religious

The Clash of Civilizations Essay examples
Ernest Hemingway stated that, "In modern war ... you will die like a dog for no good reason"! Even though that is true, experts have gone further by
trying to find the "roots" and explain why conflicts emerge in the first place. Two experts, Samuel P. Huntington and John R. Bowen, present two
different approaches towards the cause of conflicts in 21st century. Although there is a difference between their approaches, both of them share the
common believe that a conflict may occur when one puts pressure on the other; but the reason why this pressure takes place, varies among the two
theories. In his article, "The Clash of Civilizations", Huntington points out that in the 21st century, conflicts will not occur based on ideology of a state
or...show more content...
When it comes to this case, according to Huntington, the Western are accused by the Eastern for double standard, "one standard to their kin–countries
and a different standard to others" (373). The second key point that Huntington makes, is that the over–pressure of a Western towards the non–Western
creates allies between different cultures on the Eastern civilization. As he stated, "the divine line is not always sharp", hence civilizations may go
through a cultural meltdown and states may overpass their traditional and religion values. But this overlap creates even deeper division in the foreign
affairs where there are only two sides: The Western and the Rest. This was clearly evident with Arabian countries in the post Gulf War period, when
they switched sides and adapted a Western policy against Sadam, who preferred an Anti–Western policy. Moreover, the obstacles that are created by the
Western towards the non–Western, brings the non–Western civilization to a cross–road, where they either join the Western civilization, or create
alliances among other non–Western, thus "competing with the West by developing their own economic, military and political power" (376). For
example, even though Japan is consider as an Eastern civilization, with a geographic position near the Communist country – China, and feared from the
Communist pressure – influence that may occurred within Japan, managed to "establish a unique position for itself as an associate member of the

Examples Of The Clash Of Civilizations
"The clash of civilizations thesis is useful for analyzing current world conflicts."
Our group are not going to say this thesis are all correct, but some parts in the thesis are still useful and quite correct for analyzing current world
conflicts, especially the relationship between Western and non–Western civilizations.
The Clash of Civilizations is a pessimistic view of the conflict by the growing globalization between international politics (Huntington, 1993). Clash of
Civilizations is proposed by the American conservative political scientist Huntington. He believes that the end of Cold War will not lead to the
elimination of the international conflicts, but in another pattern of international conflict to replace. The cause of the conflicts are not ideological
differences or economic interests, but rather caused by cultural differences. Nation states still remain the main unit of involving in the international
affairs. However, the international conflicts will mainly occur between countries of differentculture groups. The clash of civilizations will become the
core of global politics.
To understand Huntington's view, one should first understand the definition of "civilizations" that proposed by him. He has defined civilizations as
"cultural entity", which...show more content...
The conflicts along the fault are more serious because the civilizations are basic and inviolable. Different countries in the same civilization are easier
to cooperate and the trust is higher. We take the War in Donbass as an example again. This is an armed conflict in the Donbass region of Ukraine. It
occurred along the fault line between Western and Orthodox civilizations. The cultural division ofEurope between Western Christianity, Orthodox
Christianity has reemerged after the ideological division of Europe has disappeared. After all, the War in Donbass

Critical Analysis Of The Clash Of Civilization
In The Clash of Civilization, Samuel P. Huntington argues that globalization has united cultures that were normally very withdrawn. It has increased
contact between these cultures, which then led to an increase in misunderstanding, resentment, and eventually conflict. Huntington also hypothesizes
that the leading factor of conflict in the 21st century will be the differences between cultures. This will eventually result in the change of dominance
within civilizations to different civilizations. Lastly, he also predicts that the West, Arab nations, such as Saudi Arabia, and China will also have and an
increase in cultural conflict with one another.
Huntington then goes on to hypothesize that the ultimate source of conflict in this world will not only be ideological or economical but the division
between human kind will mostly take place because of the cultural conflict. He says that "The clash of civilizations will dominate global politics. The
fault lines between civilizations will be the battle lines of the future."(82). In order to have a better and concise understanding of Huntington's "Clash of
Civilizations?" it is necessary to understand the strengths of his argument. The strengths in his argument are well portrayed through his division of the
world in eight different civilizations and also through his explanation of why there is conflict between cultures. Also, he portrays that cultural issues
tend to be more complicated to resolve than political dilemmas. These

Many people believe the beginning of these clashes of civilizations started with the crusades. This is because it was one of the earliest set of contacts
between the Muslim and Christian worlds. The crusades routed when the Christian leaders wanted to take the Holy Land which was Jerusalem. The
conflict here was the Muslim empires had held this land to be there's since the 600s. These Crusades lasted from 1095–1291 starting with the only
successful crusade where the Christians took Jerusalem from Muslin armies in 1099. After the fourth crusade, there was the Sack of Constantinople
that made 15,000 homeless, and damage to the city. With this much destruction and fighting and not coming to a final resolution, it's easy to see how a
conflict...show more content...
The last aspect to point out in more recent times compared to the crusades and colonialism is the cold war, and how that has and will continue to
impact the opposing views of western and Islamic societies. According to Samuel Huntington, the cold war the world was separated into the First,
Second and Third Worlds, and he sees divisions are no longer relevant and it being "...far more meaningful now to group countries not in terms of their
political or economic systems or in terms of their level of economic development but rather in terms of their culture and civilization." Distinguishing
people in the correct way can help further people understanding of the cultural and educate people enough to not fall into such prejudices and
stereotypes. Huntington believed that there will be more conflict between the two societies in time to come. One way he expresses this is by the
post–cold war conflict in the Persian Gulf, and Caucasus and Bosnia, now although these were not full–scale war between the civilizations, it still
involved many "...elements of civilizational rallying, which seemed to become more important as the conflict continued and which may provide a
foretaste of the future." With that, it is notable to see all the differences that has risen recently between China and the United States in such areas

Samuel Huntington's controversial article "The Clash of Civilizations?" was first published in Foreign Affairs in 1993 and was subsequently turned
into a book in 1996 titled The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order. As this paper will show Huntington's work can be seen as a
product of the post–Cold War context it was written in. Huntington's article takes a new perspective on the new world order and outlines a different
way a thinking about how future world conflicts will unfold. Since the initial journal article was published in 1993 there has been a great deal of
response from academics and also from Huntington himself. A majority of the responses come in the form of critiques, with the authors offering their
own insight into how the post–Cold War World will operate. Although the validity of Huntington's arguments have been questioned, it did create a
great deal of controversy in the academic world. As Huntington explained in the preface of his 1996 book, the original article published in Foreign
Affairs created more discussion in three years than any other article published in the journal since the 1940s.
Huntington's initial article argued that in the post–Cold War era the fundamental source of conflict would not be ideological or economic, but cultural.
He continues by arguing that nation states will continue to be the most powerful actors in global affairs, but the conflicts of global politics that are to
occur in the future will happen between

Clash Of Civilizations Analysis
In 1992, at the end of the Cold War, political scientist Francis Fukuyama argued that with Western Liberal Democracy's victory in the battle of
ideologies, there was no more history to be made. Indeed, in such a monumental moment in human history, it may have been easy for scholars to
believe that the human experience is done developing. Samuel Huntington responded to Fukuyama in his 1993 essay "Clash of Civilizations,"
arguing that history is far from over. Rather, world politics is simply entering a new phase, in which global conflict is centered on civilizational lines,
rather than ideological or political lines. When we look back on his essay, we see that his hypothesis has manifested in several key events in world
politics regarding our case studies and current events around the world.
Huntington credited the Cold War with bringing global stability. Because the world was split into Capitalist and Communist, countries of different
cultures and background united under one cause: defeat the other side. In addition, the concept of "Mutually assured destruction" protected us from the
prospect of destructive, nuclear war between countries on the Capitalist side and countries on the Communist side. However, after the Cold War ended,
people needed to find new lines to identify themselves with: cultural lines. In Clash of Civilizations, Huntington outlines 3 ways in which civilizations
will clash: core state conflicts, fault line conflicts, and "The West Versus the Rest."

Analysis of The Clash of Civilizations by Samuel P. Huntington
The article "The Clash of Civilizations?" by Samuel P. Huntington is an intriguing view on how modern day civilizations have grown to become
cultural and economic entities trying to make new identities for themselves. A civilization is defined as the broadest cultural grouping of people. It
contains a group of people with common languages, history, religion, and customs. Huntington states in his hypothesis "the great division among
humankind and the dominating source of conflict will be culture." Huntington sees the Western civilization, consisting of mainly the United States and
most of Europe, as a dominate civilization. He expresses the opinion that due to the...show more content...
Huntington's regards to the reality of ethnic and religious identities is as follows, "civilization identity will be increasingly important in the future, and
the world in large will be measured by the interactions among seven or eight major civilizations." He follows up by elaborating on how these
interactions become the turning point in civilization interaction. The interactions between civilizations have become increasingly relevant due to the
increasing populations of the world. This in turn has caused an awakening in cultural awareness. Economic developments as well as social changes
throughout the world also modify well defined identities. The most prevalent interactions among civilizations can be observed in the recent 9/11
attacks on the United States. Huntington closes his article by stating that "the West will increasingly have to accommodate these non–Western modern
civilizations whose power approaches that of the West but whose values and interests differ significantly of those of the West." In light of the present
post 9/11 world, Huntington views of the Arab Islamic civilization have come into full view. Support for his thesis has become relevant and there has
ultimately become a clash of civilizations.
Reference
Samuel P. Huntington "The Clash of Civilizations," The Changing Security Environment and American National Interests,

In Amartya Sen's book, Identity and Violence, he discusses an article that was written by Samuel Huntington, called Clash of civilizations. The article
Clash of Civilizations is Huntington's take on how violence will be caused post Cold War. . He argues that the cause of violence after the ColdWar will
be due to differences within cultural and religious identities. However, this article was written in 1993, and surely times have changed from then.
There's been quite a few articles written critiquing Huntington's, Clash of Civilization since it was written. Of those critiques, I will be using Edward
Said's article "The Clash of Ignorance," and of course Sen's discussion of the Clash of Civilizations in Identity and Violence. Sen jumps...show more
content...
I remember interrupting a man who, after a lecture I had given at a West Bank university in 1994, rose from the audience and started to attack my
ideas as "Western," as opposed to the strict Islamic ones he espoused. "Why are you wearing a suit and tie?" was the first retort that came to mind.
"They're Western too." He sat down with an embarrassed smile on his face..." He also goes on to say that the Clash of Civilization that the
comparison of the West and Islam needs to stop and we must find more parallels between the two groups to resolve some issues. When I first read
Clash of Civilization I agreed with everything Huntington said. After I read the critiques and saw a new perspective on the article I felt very
different about it. Once I had read the critiques and had a better grasp on the Clash of Civilizations I saw the article as something that only scratched
the surface of all the issues that would develop post cold war. I can understand why the article was so popular at the time of when it first came out
because then it was accurate and easy to read. However, as time goes on politics, culture, and society in general is becoming increasingly more
complex and the Clash of Civilization has failed to keep up with it. The article is overly

A Summary Of The Clash Of Civilizations

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

Similar to A Summary Of The Clash Of Civilizations

Similar to A Summary Of The Clash Of Civilizations (7)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

A Summary Of The Clash Of Civilizations