1. Deposition of very thin films by
thermal evaporation using a heated
substrate
by
Conor Browne
Supervised by
Dr. Ger O’ Connor
2. Project Aims
• Deposit a range of Aluminium thin films of specific thickness onto a
dielectric (Glass) substrate.
• Characterise these samples using Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM),
White Light Interferometry (WLI) and Spectral Reflectivity (SR).
• Develop a high temperature substrate capability within the thermal
evaporator apparatus.
• Compare and contrast heated and non-heated samples using the
results gathered from the AFM, WLI and SR.
Applications:
Mirrors Space blankets Spaceship insulation
Slide 2
4. K975x Thermal Evaporator set-up Standard method:
• Place mass of Aluminium in the crucible,
place glass slide into the slide holder.
• Begin the vacuum process.
• Increase the current to turn Al into a vapour.
• Upon reaching desired thickness turn down
current.
• Purge the chamber.
0
3
6
9
12
15
18
21
24
27
30
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
DepositedAl
thickness(nm)
Time (s)
Average Deposition Rates
12 Amps
Averaged
11 Amps
Averaged
10 Amps
Averaged
9 Amps
Averaged
Slide 4
Experimental procedure
5. Glass slide heater
Heater method:
• Ramp up the current to 35A over
100s (3-4A every 10s).
• Heat slide for 300s at this current.
• Ramp current down over 100s.
• Begin deposition process.
Improvements made to the standard method:
• Use of a constant mass of Aluminium.
• Steady increase in current supply (One Amp
increase every 10 seconds).
• Cleaning glass slides with Isoclene before
use.
• Handled slides with latex gloves.
• Evaporating off any residual Aluminium that
built up on the crucible.
Thin film sample of
thickness 25.6 ±3.25 nm
Slide 5
Experimental procedure
9. Conclusion
• Roughness and grain size have all been improved upon heating
of the substrate. Reflectivity has decreased due to the grain size.
• Reduction of 41.6% in the roughness of heated samples when
compared to non-heated samples from the results of the AFM.
• WLI measurements of both sets of samples verified a reduction in
the roughness of the heated samples.
• The grain sizes of the heated samples were found to be roughly
3.5 times larger than the grain sizes observed in non-heated
samples from the results of the AFM grain size analysis.
Slide 9
10. Acknowledgements
Thank you for your time.
I would like to thank:
Dr. Ger O’ Connor
James Nallen
Conor Mc Brierty
Clare Mc Daniel
Pinaki Das Gupta
Slide 10