Printer Version - Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System http://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/press/monetary/20150917a.htm[9/21/2015 2:49:59 PM] Print Press Release Release Date: September 17, 2015 For immediate release Information received since the Federal Open Market Committee met in July suggests that economic activity is expanding at a moderate pace. Household spending and business fixed investment have been increasing moderately, and the housing sector has improved further; however, net exports have been soft. The labor market continued to improve, with solid job gains and declining unemployment. On balance, labor market indicators show that underutilization of labor resources has diminished since early this year. Inflation has continued to run below the Committee's longer-run objective, partly reflecting declines in energy prices and in prices of non-energy imports. Market-based measures of inflation compensation moved lower; survey- based measures of longer-term inflation expectations have remained stable. Consistent with its statutory mandate, the Committee seeks to foster maximum employment and price stability. Recent global economic and financial developments may restrain economic activity somewhat and are likely to put further downward pressure on inflation in the near term. Nonetheless, the Committee expects that, with appropriate policy accommodation, economic activity will expand at a moderate pace, with labor market indicators continuing to move toward levels the Committee judges consistent with its dual mandate. The Committee continues to see the risks to the outlook for economic activity and the labor market as nearly balanced but is monitoring developments abroad. Inflation is anticipated to remain near its recent low level in the near term but the Committee expects inflation to rise gradually toward 2 percent over the medium term as the labor market improves further and the transitory effects of declines in energy and import prices dissipate. The Committee continues to monitor inflation developments closely. To support continued progress toward maximum employment and price stability, the Committee today reaffirmed its view that the current 0 to 1/4 percent target range for the federal funds rate remains appropriate. In determining how long to maintain this target range, the Committee will assess progress-- both realized and expected--toward its objectives of maximum employment and 2 percent inflation. This assessment will take into account a wide range of information, including measures of labor market conditions, indicators of inflation pressures and inflation expectations, and readings on financial and international developments. The Committee anticipates that it will be appropriate to raise the target range for the federal funds rate when it has seen some further improvement in the labor market and is reasonably confident that inflation will move back to its 2 percent objective over the medium ter.

1. Printer Version - Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
System
http://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/press/monetary/2015
0917a.htm[9/21/2015 2:49:59 PM]
Print
Press Release
Release Date: September 17, 2015
For immediate release
Information received since the Federal Open Market Committee
met in July suggests that economic activity
is expanding at a moderate pace. Household spending and
business fixed investment have been increasing
moderately, and the housing sector has improved further;
however, net exports have been soft. The labor
market continued to improve, with solid job gains and declining
unemployment. On balance, labor market
indicators show that underutilization of labor resources has
diminished since early this year. Inflation has
continued to run below the Committee's longer-run objective,
partly reflecting declines in energy prices and
in prices of non-energy imports. Market-based measures of
inflation compensation moved lower; survey-
based measures of longer-term inflation expectations have
remained stable.
Consistent with its statutory mandate, the Committee seeks to

2. foster maximum employment and price
stability. Recent global economic and financial developments
may restrain economic activity somewhat and
are likely to put further downward pressure on inflation in the
near term. Nonetheless, the Committee
expects that, with appropriate policy accommodation, economic
activity will expand at a moderate pace,
with labor market indicators continuing to move toward levels
the Committee judges consistent with its
dual mandate. The Committee continues to see the risks to the
outlook for economic activity and the labor
market as nearly balanced but is monitoring developments
abroad. Inflation is anticipated to remain near
its recent low level in the near term but the Committee expects
inflation to rise gradually toward 2 percent
over the medium term as the labor market improves further and
the transitory effects of declines in energy
and import prices dissipate. The Committee continues to
monitor inflation developments closely.
To support continued progress toward maximum employment
and price stability, the Committee today
reaffirmed its view that the current 0 to 1/4 percent target range
for the federal funds rate remains
appropriate. In determining how long to maintain this target
range, the Committee will assess progress--
both realized and expected--toward its objectives of maximum
employment and 2 percent inflation. This
assessment will take into account a wide range of information,
including measures of labor market
conditions, indicators of inflation pressures and inflation
expectations, and readings on financial and
international developments. The Committee anticipates that it
will be appropriate to raise the target range
for the federal funds rate when it has seen some further
improvement in the labor market and is

3. reasonably confident that inflation will move back to its 2
percent objective over the medium term.
The Committee is maintaining its existing policy of reinvesting
principal payments from its holdings of
agency debt and agency mortgage-backed securities in agency
mortgage-backed securities and of rolling
over maturing Treasury securities at auction. This policy, by
keeping the Committee's holdings of longer-
term securities at sizable levels, should help maintain
accommodative financial conditions.
When the Committee decides to begin to remove policy
accommodation, it will take a balanced approach
consistent with its longer-run goals of maximum employment
and inflation of 2 percent. The Committee
currently anticipates that, even after employment and inflation
are near mandate-consistent levels,
economic conditions may, for some time, warrant keeping the
target federal funds rate below levels the
Committee views as normal in the longer run.
http://www.federalreserve.gov/feeds/press_all.xml
javascript:printable('/resources/print_news.css');
javascript:printable('/resources/print_news.css');
Printer Version - Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
System
http://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/press/monetary/2015
0917a.htm[9/21/2015 2:49:59 PM]
Voting for the FOMC monetary policy action were: Janet L.
Yellen, Chair; William C. Dudley, Vice Chairman;
Lael Brainard; Charles L. Evans; Stanley Fischer; Dennis P.

4. Lockhart; Jerome H. Powell; Daniel K. Tarullo;
and John C. Williams. Voting against the action was Jeffrey M.
Lacker, who preferred to raise the target
range for the federal funds rate by 25 basis points at this
meeting.
2015 Monetary Policy Releases
http://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/press/monetary/2015
monetary.htmfederalreserve.govPrinter Version - Board of
Governors of the Federal Reserve System
find both the point-slope form and the slope-intercept form of
the line with the given slope which passes through the given
point.
m = -1 , P(3, -1)
Advance release of table 1 of the Summary of Economic
Projections to be released with the FOMC minutes
Percent
Variable
Median
1
Central tendency
2
Range
3
2015 2016 2017 2018 Longer

5. run
2015 2016 2017 2018 Longer
run
2015 2016 2017 2018 Longer
run
Change in real GDP 2.1 2.3 2.2 2.0 2.0 2.0 – 2.3 2.2 – 2.6 2.0 –
2.4 1.8 – 2.2 1.8 – 2.2 1.9 – 2.5 2.1 – 2.8 1.9 – 2.6 1.6 – 2.4 1.8
– 2.7
June projection 1.9 2.5 2.3 n.a. 2.0 1.8 – 2.0 2.4 – 2.7 2.1 – 2.5
n.a. 2.0 – 2.3 1.7 – 2.3 2.3 – 3.0 2.0 – 2.5 n.a. 1.8 – 2.5
Unemployment rate 5.0 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.9 5.0 – 5.1 4.7 – 4.9 4.7 –
4.9 4.7 – 5.0 4.9 – 5.2 4.9 – 5.2 4.5 – 5.0 4.5 – 5.0 4.6 – 5.3 4.7
– 5.8
June projection 5.3 5.1 5.0 n.a. 5.0 5.2 – 5.3 4.9 – 5.1 4.9 – 5.1
n.a. 5.0 – 5.2 5.0 – 5.3 4.6 – 5.2 4.8 – 5.5 n.a. 5.0 – 5.8
PCE inflation 0.4 1.7 1.9 2.0 2.0 0.3 – 0.5 1.5 – 1.8 1.8 – 2.0
2.0 2.0 0.3 – 1.0 1.5 – 2.4 1.7 – 2.2 1.8 – 2.1 2.0
June projection 0.7 1.8 2.0 n.a. 2.0 0.6 – 0.8 1.6 – 1.9 1.9 – 2.0
n.a. 2.0 0.6 – 1.0 1.5 – 2.4 1.7 – 2.2 n.a. 2.0
Core PCE inflation
4
1.4 1.7 1.9 2.0 1.3 – 1.4 1.5 – 1.8 1.8 – 2.0 1.9 – 2.0 1.2 – 1.7
1.5 – 2.4 1.7 – 2.2 1.8 – 2.1

6. June projection 1.3 1.8 2.0 n.a. 1.3 – 1.4 1.6 – 1.9 1.9 – 2.0 n.a.
1.2 – 1.6 1.5 – 2.4 1.7 – 2.2 n.a.
Memo: Projected
appropriate policy path
Federal funds rate 0.4 1.4 2.6 3.4 3.5 0.1 – 0.6 1.1 – 2.1 2.1 –
3.4 3.0 – 3.6 3.3 – 3.8 -0.1 – 0.9 -0.1 – 2.9 1.0 – 3.9 2.9 – 3.9
3.0 – 4.0
June projection 0.6 1.6 2.9 n.a. 3.8 0.4 – 0.9 1.4 – 2.4 2.4 – 3.8
n.a. 3.5 – 3.8 0.1 – 0.9 0.4 – 2.9 2.0 – 3.9 n.a. 3.3 – 4.3
Note: Projections of change in real gross domestic product
(GDP) and projections for both measures of inflation are
percent changes from the fourth quarter of the previous
year to the fourth quarter of the year indicated. PCE inflation
and core PCE inflation are the percentage rates of change in,
respectively, the price index for personal consumption
expenditures (PCE) and the price index for PCE excluding food
and energy. Projections for the unemployment rate are for the
average civilian unemployment rate in the fourth
quarter of the year indicated. Each participant’s projections are
based on his or her assessment of appropriate monetary policy.
Longer-run projections represent each participant’s
assessment of the rate to which each variable would be expected
to converge under appropriate monetary policy and in the
absence of further shocks to the economy. The projections
for the federal funds rate are the value (rounded to the nearest
1/8 percentage point) of the midpoint of the projected
appropriate target range for the federal funds rate or the
projected
appropriate target level for the federal funds rate at the end of
the specified calendar year or over the longer run. The June

7. projections were made in conjunction with the meeting of
the Federal Open Market Committee on June 16–17, 2015.
1. For each period, the median is the middle projection when the
projections are arranged from lowest to highest. When the
number of projections is even, the median is the
average of the two middle projections.
2. The central tendency excludes the three highest and three
lowest projections for each variable in each year.
3. The range for a variable in a given year includes all
participants’ projections, from lowest to highest, for that
variable in that year.
4. Longer-run projections for core PCE inflation are not
collected.
Economic projections of Federal Reserve Board members and
Federal Reserve Bank presidents under
their individual assessments of projected appropriate monetary
policy, September 2015
Embargoed for release at 2:00 p.m., EDT, September 17, 2015
Figure 1. Medians, central tendencies, and ranges of economic
projections, 2015–18 and over the longer run
Change in real GDP
Percent
0
1

8. 2
3
4
-
+
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Longer
run
Central tendency of projections
Range of projections
Median of projections
Actual
Unemployment rate
Percent
5
6
7
8
9

9. 10
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Longer
run
PCE inflation
Percent
1
2
3
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Longer
run
Note: Definitions of variables are in the general note to the
projections table. The data for the actual values of
the variables are annual.
Figure 2. Overview of FOMC participants’ assessments of
appropriate monetary policy
13
3
1
Appropriate timing of policy firming
Number of participants

10. 1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
2015 2016 2017
Percent
Appropriate pace of policy firming: Midpoint of target range or
target level for the federal funds rate

11. -
+
0.5
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
2015 2016 2017 2018 Longer run
Note: In the upper panel, the height of each bar denotes the
number of FOMC participants who judge that, under
appropriate monetary policy, the first increase in the target
range for the federal funds rate from its current range of 0 to
1/4 percent will occur in the specified calendar year. In June
2015, the numbers of FOMC participants who judged that

12. the first increase in the target federal funds rate would occur in
2015, 2016, and 2017 were, respectively, 15, 2, and 0.
In the lower panel, each shaded circle indicates the value
(rounded to the nearest 1/8 percentage point) of an individual
participant’s judgment of the midpoint of the appropriate target
range for the federal funds rate or the appropriate
target level for the federal funds rate at the end of the specified
calendar year or over the longer run.
Note on Modifications to Summary of Economic Projections
Materials
As announced in the minutes of the Committee’s July meeting,
the Summary of
Economic Projections (SEP) materials for this meeting
incorporate two modifications:
-hand panel shows the median SEP
responses for each of the
economic variables. In addition, the table now provides
information on
participants’ projections of the appropriate level of the federal
funds rate as a
memo item.
r each
variable are shown by
red lines.
The inclusion of medians in the SEP materials is intended to

13. provide an additional
useful summary statistic of Committee participants’
perspectives; however, the medians
do not represent a collective view or Committee forecast.
Explanation of Economic Projections Charts
The charts show actual values and projections for three
economic variables, based on
FOMC participants’ individual assessments of appropriate
monetary policy:
Domestic Product (GDP)—as measured
from the fourth
quarter of the previous year to the fourth quarter of the year
indicated, with
values plotted at the end of each year.
—the average civilian unemployment rate
in the fourth
quarter of each year, with values plotted at the end of each year.
—as measured by the change in the personal
consumption
expenditures (PCE) price index from the fourth quarter of the
previous year to
the fourth quarter of the year indicated, with values plotted at
the end of each
year.

14. Information for these variables is shown for each year from
2010 to 2018, and for the
longer run.
The solid black line, labeled “Actual,” shows the historical
values for each variable.
The lightly shaded areas represent the ranges of the projections
of policymakers. The
bottom of the range for each variable is the lowest of all of the
projections for that year or
period. Likewise, the top of the range is the highest of all of
the projections for that year
or period.
The dark shaded areas represent the central tendency, which is a
narrower version of the
range that excludes the three highest and three lowest
projections for each variable in each
year or period.
The solid red line depicts the median projection in each period
for each variable. The
median value in each period is the middle projection when the
projections are arranged
from lowest to highest. When the number of projections is
even, the median is the average
of the two middle projections.
The longer-run projections, which are shown on the far right
side of the charts, are the
rates of growth, unemployment, and inflation to which a
policymaker expects the economy
to converge over time—maybe in five or six years—in the
absence of further shocks and
under appropriate monetary policy. Because appropriate

15. monetary policy, by definition, is
aimed at achieving the Federal Reserve’s dual mandate of
maximum employment and price
stability in the longer run, policymakers’ longer-run projections
for economic growth and
unemployment may be interpreted, respectively, as estimates of
the economy’s normal or
trend rate of growth and its normal unemployment rate over the
longer run. The longer-
run projection shown for inflation is the rate of inflation judged
to be most consistent with
the Federal Reserve’s dual mandate.
Explanation of Policy Path Charts
These charts are based on policymakers’ assessments of
appropriate monetary policy,
which, by definition, is the future path of policy that each
participant deems most
likely to foster outcomes for economic activity and inflation
that best satisfy his or her
interpretation of the Federal Reserve’s dual objectives of
maximum employment and
stable prices.
e height of each bar denotes the number
of FOMC
participants who judge that, under appropriate monetary policy,
the first
increase in the target range for the federal funds rate from its
current range of 0
to ¼ percent will occur in the specified calendar year.

16. (rounded to the
nearest ⅛ percentage point) of an individual participant’s
judgment of the
midpoint of the appropriate target range for the federal funds
rate or the
appropriate target level for the federal funds rate at the end of
the specified
calendar year or over the longer run.
These assessments of the timing of the first increase of the
target range for the federal
funds rate and for the path of policy are the ones that
policymakers view as
compatible with their individual economic projections.