BIO 229 Anatomy and Physiology Name: _________________________________________ Date: _______________ 1. Explain how anatomy and physiology are related. 2. What is the largest organ we have and how does it protect us from disease? 3. List and describe the major characteristics of life. 4. What are five components of our metabolism? 5. Why is pressure and important requirement for living organisms? 6. Describe the parts of a homeostatic mechanism and explain how they function together, use an example. 7. List three organ systems in the human body, include the components, and tell what their functions are. 8. Describe the anatomical position. 9. Start with the DNA sequence below and show me the mRNA strand. ATG GCG CGC ACG AGC TAG 10. Use the mRNA strand and show me the corresponding tRNA strand 11. Use the tRNA strand and the chart below to tell me the final amino acid sequence from the tRNA strand 12. Where is DNA found in a cell? 13. Where in the cell is protein made? BIO 229 Anatomy and Physiology N ame: _________________________________________ Date: _______________ 1. Explain how anatomy and physiology are related. 2. What is the largest organ we have and how does it protect us from disease? 3. List and describe the major characteristics of life. 4. What are five components of our metabolism? 5. Why is pressure and important requirement for living organisms? 6. Describe the parts of a homeostatic mechanism and explain how they function together, use an example. 7. List three organ systems in the human body, include the components, and tell what their functions are. 8. D escribe the anatomical position. 9. S tart with the DNA sequence below and show me the mRNA strand. ATG GCG CGC ACG AGC TAG 10. Use the mRNA strand and show me the corresponding tRNA strand BIO 229 Anatomy and Physiology Name: _________________________________________ Date: _______________ 1. Explain how anatomy and physiology are related. 2. What is the largest organ we have and how does it protect us from disease? 3. List and describe the major characteristics of life. 4. What are five components of our metabolism? 5. Why is pressure and important requirement for living organisms? 6. Describe the parts of a homeostatic mechanism and explain how they function together, use an example. 7. List three organ systems in the human body, include the components, and tell what their functions are. 8. Describe the anatomical position. 9. Start with the DNA sequence below and show me the mRNA strand. ATG GCG CGC ACG AGC TAG 10. Use the mRNA strand and show me the corresponding tRNA strand 1 Women and family Aakil Patel PHL 106 Eduardo O Frajman Short Paper #4 Women and family Unlike the early contractual models that were developed of “equal men” where women were not allowed to claim equal treatment in the public sphe ...

1. BIO 229 Anatomy and Physiology
Name: _________________________________________
Date: _______________
1. Explain how anatomy and physiology are related.
2. What is the largest organ we have and how does it protect us
from disease?
3. List and describe the major characteristics of life.
4. What are five components of our metabolism?
5. Why is pressure and important requirement for living
organisms?
6. Describe the parts of a homeostatic mechanism and explain
how they function together, use an example.
7. List three organ systems in the human body, include the
components, and tell what their functions are.
8. Describe the anatomical position.
9. Start with the DNA sequence below and show me the mRNA
strand.
ATG GCG CGC ACG AGC TAG
10. Use the mRNA strand and show me the corresponding tRNA
strand

2. 11. Use the tRNA strand and the chart below to tell me the final
amino acid sequence from the tRNA strand
12. Where is DNA found in a cell?
13. Where in the cell is protein made?
BIO 229 Anatomy and Physiology
N
ame: _________________________________________
Date: _______________
1.
Explain how anatomy and physiology are related.
2.
What is the largest organ we have and how does it protect us
from disease?
3.

3. List and describe the major
characteristics
of life.
4.
What are five components of our metabolism?
5.
Why is pressure and important requirement for living
organisms?
6.
Describe the parts of a homeostatic mechanism and explain how
they function together, use an
example.
7.
List three organ systems in the human body, include the
components, and tell what
their functions
are.
8.
D

4. escribe the anatomical position.
9.
S
tart with the
DNA sequence below and show me the mRNA strand.
ATG GCG CGC ACG AGC TAG
10.
Use the mRNA strand and show me the corresponding tRNA
strand
BIO 229 Anatomy and Physiology
Name: _________________________________________ Date:
_______________
1. Explain how anatomy and physiology are related.
2. What is the largest organ we have and how does it protect us
from disease?
3. List and describe the major characteristics of life.
4. What are five components of our metabolism?

5. 5. Why is pressure and important requirement for living
organisms?
6. Describe the parts of a homeostatic mechanism and explain
how they function together, use an
example.
7. List three organ systems in the human body, include the
components, and tell what their functions
are.
8. Describe the anatomical position.
9. Start with the DNA sequence below and show me the mRNA
strand.
ATG GCG CGC ACG AGC TAG
10. Use the mRNA strand and show me the corresponding tRNA
strand
1
Women and family
Aakil Patel

6. PHL 106
Eduardo O Frajman
Short Paper #4
Women and family
Unlike the early contractual models that were developed of
“equal men” where women were not allowed to claim equal
treatment in the public sphere or at home. Even though thew
were later allowed to work in the factories they still did not get
a right to claim equal opportunities compared their male
counterparts. Also, their children were literally exempted from
what was deemed to be distinctively individual in contractual
terms. I argue that women are exemplary human being s and
they deserve an equal share of what the society has on
opportunities.
For instance, the ideology that women being seen as “primarily
mothers and under, and mothering as a primarily biological
function” is not just in different context to society and
resources available to raise a child will vary and the role can be
opted to be taken by the society or with an individual. The
stereotype widely perceived of women being closer to nature

7. than men thus is a trap to natures function believing more or
those processes women can also go through. Therefore,
understanding that animals and humans have a different kind
mothering will be prudent on which roles the society dictates to
women. Therefore, recognizing a comparable distinction
between human mothering and mothering of other species would
be fitting to dictate on the contractual arguments
When women are given equal opportunities in raising family, it
will shape culture and language and also enhance morality in
our society. According to Held, 1993 states that “Human
mothering teaches consideration for others based on moral
concern; it does not merely follow
and bring the child to follow instinctive tendency. Human
mothering creates autonomous
persons; it does not merely propagate a species” [page????]
from this perspective mothering cannot be completely “natural”
compared to other human activities but it involves different
environment to shape up individuals in a given society.
Also, having men partake the role of mothering is essential
as it builds bridges between the misconceptions to create a
clarity that one might have before on what is moral to society
on gender roles. Naturing of children is more preferable than
mothering which may be considered as an activity mostly done
by women. Humans are self-contained, self-interested creatures.
Human beings are inherently logical, and reason entails
selecting the most efficient means of achieving our objectives.
Contractual partnerships also assist us in achieving our
objectives. As a result, humans can form contractual
partnerships.
Work Cited
Distinguished Professor of Philosophy Virginia Held, & Held,
V. (1993). Feminist morality: Transforming culture, society,
and politics. University of Chicago Press.
Did you read this book? Or did you use our textbook?
This paper lacks focus and direction. It does not explain Held’s

8. argument clearly and does not use the text to support your
claims.
The paper should not be n opportunity for you to just tell me
your opinion aboit women. It needs to be about the specific
argument you are discussing.
Grade 2/5
MOTHERING AND MORAL THEORY 1
Mothering and moral theory
Aakil Patel
PHL 106
Eduardo O Frajman
Short Paper #4
Mothering and moral theory
The connection between the mother and her child is further
explored in the mother's and moral philosophy. The degree to
which it is not mutual and thus not binding is one of the first
facets of the partnership. On the one hand, the ties between
children and mothers are affectionate and caring. On the other
hand, they are related and dependent. Most mothers have had
very little ability to bear and take care of children throughout
history, which is still so today for most mothers. The
relationship can be voluntary for the mothering parent, but it
cannot be voluntary for the child, and it can only become
somewhat more voluntary gradually (Held, 1993).
Society can place mutual responsibilities on parents to care for
their children when they are young and on children to care for

9. their parents when they are aged. However, if there is some
aspect of a bargain in the relationship between mother and
child, it is very different from the bargain allegedly typical of
the marketplace (Hanshaw, 2018).. If a parent thinks, "I will
take care of you now, so you will take care of me when I am
old," it must be founded on immense confidence and a relative
absence of compliance, unlike contracts of political and
economic bargains.
Another aspect of the mothering person-child arrangement that
can be problematic is its outlook on our understandings of
equality. It proves without a shadow of a doubt that equality
does not mean equal legal rights. Both feminists are committed
to equality and civil rights where fair values are at stake.
However, under certain circumstances, topics other than rights
take precedence and are more critical. Moreover, the equality at
stake in the child-mother partnership is the fair representation
of people, not a civil or legislative definition of equal
protection. Parents and children are not seen equally in terms of
whether they can make choices, do or have the same things. A
family with multiple small children, an adult or two, and an
elderly parent does not usually make decisions by majority vote.
Any member of the family, therefore, is entitled to proper
respect and consideration.
According to Held, 1993 what is significant about the
relationship between the infant and the mother is that clearly,
we do not comply with our duties by simply leaving individuals
alone. He is going to hunger if he leaves a child alone. She will
quickly hurt herself if she leaves a two-year-old alone. It is
more effectively seen that the whole practice of not interfering
with others is inappropriate to honor others. It assumes that
people should support themselves and have what they need
through their programs and efforts. This will cause us to see
how unsatisfactory these prevailing political viewpoints exclude
interference from fulfilling our obligations. We ought to

10. recognize that the fundamental right to the food, shelter, and
medical services required for life and growth for our fellow
citizens and fellow people in the world and that there are few
reasons for not doing this when the means exist to respect those
rights. These privileges should not be allowed to go hungry
unimpeded (Friedman, 2019).
I don’t understand what this paper is talking about. Do you? I
don’t think you do. I think you are copying from other people’s
articles without explaining or connecting the ideas.
Grade 0/5
Work Cited
Distinguished Professor of Philosophy Virginia Held, & Held,
V. (1993). Feminist morality: Transforming culture, society,
and politics. University of Chicago Press.
Friedman, M. (2019). 14. Feminism and Modern Friendship:
Dislocating the Community (pp. 285-302). Cornell
University Press.
Hanshaw, H. (2018). Rawls and Feminism. CLA Journal, (6),
182-195.
A good life versus the good life—the simple prepositional
substitution results in vastly different images. The first, of a
stoic, self-sacrificing soul who lives in service to others. The
second, of a large bank account, a beach, and an unbuttoned
Hawaiian shirt. Perhaps, however, these ideas are not really so
disparate. In fact, perhaps they are intimately related. This is
the basic idea in John Stuart Mill’s “Utilitarianism.” In it, Mill
argues that a moral life is a life dedicated to minimizing pain
and maximizing pleasure. In modern parlance, a good life is a
life lived in pursuit of the good life.
Mill begins his argument by recognizing that the debate

11. over the foundation of morality has raged for generations (Mill
924). He criticizes both the inductive school (those that believe
morals are evident a priori) and the intuitive school (those that
believe morals are based on experience and observation) for
failing to identify the governing principle behind their moral
laws. Mill writes, “Yet to support their pretensions there ought
to be some one fundamental principle or law at the root of all
morality…” (Mill 925). As expected, Mill offers to fill the void.
His answer? Utilitarian theory. Mill describes it this way: “The
creed which accepts as the foundation of morals ‘utility’ or the
‘greatest happiness principle’ holds that actions are right in
proportion as they tend to produce happiness; wrong as they
tend to produce the reverse of happiness” (Mill 927).
Utilitarianism leads Mill to some interesting conclusions.
By definition, things that cause pain are evil, and things that
produce happiness, good. Thus, a good life is one that seeks to
reduce the former and increase the latter. These “positive evils”
include indigence, disease, unkindness, poverty, and premature
loss of objects of affection (Mill 931). Lest these enemies seem
too daunting, Mill boldly asserts, “…no one whose opinion
deserves a moment’s consideration can doubt that most of the
great positive evils of the world are in themselves
removable…”—and this by human effort. (Mill 931).
At this point even Mill’s most faithful disciple is forced to
come up for air. Disease, conquerable? Cancer and heart disease
alone devastate millions as a matter of course, while a virus
currently has much of the world masked-up and locked down.
But while Mill may be forgiven for being a touch
overoptimistic, a greater blunder exists in the same statement.
Mill unequivocally states that no one whose opinion is worth
anything would argue against the assertion that poverty “may be
completely extinguished by the wisdom of society…” (Mill
930). This would include Jesus, who said, “You will always
have the poor among you” (John 12:8). The same Jesus,
incidentally, that Mill credits with perfectly summarizing the
ethics of his theory (Mill 932). The contradiction is awkward to

12. say the least.
Jesus cannot be piecemealed. A person who claims to have
all authority in heaven and on earth and who demands unilateral
obedience (Matthew 28:18-20) should not be given a platform
on human ethics—unless of course, the claims are true. So it is
with Jesus. If Mill really wants to establish the truth of his
theory, he must begin with the person who is the truth (John
14:6). His decision to not take serious Christ and his Word is a
decision to invent theories that lead to foolishness.
Notice how Mill never answers a very obvious question;
that is, why does disease, poverty, indigence, death and
anything else that robs man of pleasure exist in the first place?
To solve a problem, the problem must first be understood.
The greatest problem for mankind is that God is good and
man is not. When God created Adam in the Garden, he gave him
dominion over creation (Gen 1:28). Unfortunately, Adam sinned
by breaking God’s command to not eat of the tree of the
knowledge of good and evil. God, by definition of his goodness,
is perfectly just. The just punishment for Adam’s sin included
binding the whole of creation to decay and ultimately, death
(Rom. 5:12; 8:21). The reason for physical corruption of any
kind, whether death or disease, is God’s judgment on mankind
for sin, and mankind is powerless to reverse it.
It gets worse: Adam was not the only one to sin. Every
human being since is a sinner by nature, and volitionally acts on
that nature. As Paul writes, “There is no one who does good, no
not one” (Rom 3:12). Men and women hate God, hate his law,
and willfully break it at every opportunity. God is the only true
source of joy, happiness, and peace, and thus the rejection of
him is a fundamental rejection of these things. There is no good
life when cut off from the only one who is truly good. Thus, the
world is filled with hate, theft, murder, mockery, envy, and yes,
unhappiness. Changing the world to conform to Mill’s grand
ideas would require changing human nature, and the outlook is
not good; the leopard still cannot change his spots (Jeremiah
13:23).

13. Works Cited
Mill, John Stuart. “Utilitarianism.” Classics of Political and
Moral Philosophy edited by Stephen M. Cahn, New York, NY:
Oxford University Press, 2012, pp. 924-957.
Holy Bible, New International Version. Zondervan Publishing
House, 1984.