SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 57
Download to read offline
Understanding the Actuaries 
Pension Funding Overview for Attorneys & HR Professionals 
October 16, 2014
Agenda 
Role of the Enrolled Actuary 3 
ASOPs 8 
Funding Requirements 19 
Government Forms and Filings 40 
Recent Legislation/Hot Topics 47
Role of the Enrolled Actuary
Actuarial Credentials Cheat Sheet 
There are several different actuarial societies and organizations from which a U.S. 
actuary may hold a credential: 
• Society of Actuaries (SOA) 
• Casualty Actuarial Society (CAS) 
• Joint Board for the Enrollment of Actuaries (JBEA) 
• American Academy of Actuaries (AAA) 
• Conference of Consulting Actuaries (CCA) 
• American Society of Pension Professionals and Actuaries (ASPPA) 
U.S. pension actuaries typically hold one of more of the following designations: 
• FSA – Fellow of the Society of Actuaries 
• ASA – Associate of the Society of Actuaries 
• MAAA – Member of the American Academy of Actuaries 
• EA – Enrolled Actuary 
• FCA – Fellow of the Conference of Consulting Actuaries 
• FSPA - Fellow, Society of Pension Actuaries 
• MSPA - Member, Society of Pension Actuaries 
4
Role of the Enrolled Actuary 
• What is an enrolled actuary? 
• Any individual who has satisfied the qualifications of the Joint Board for the Enrollment 
of Actuaries (JBEA) and has been approved by the Joint Board to perform actuarial 
services under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) of 1974 
– Actuarial services is defined by the JBEA as “performance of actuarial valuations and 
preparation of any actuarial valuation reports” 
• How can I find out whether a practitioner is an enrolled actuary in good 
standing with the Joint Board? 
• Review the roster of enrolled actuaries in active status at: 
www.irs.gov/PUP/taxpros/Active%20EA%20Roster.pdf 
5
Role of the Enrolled Actuary 
U.S. Qualified Defined Benefit Plans must meet certain criteria to 
maintain their qualified status 
An EA is needed to meet some of these criteria, for example - 
• Internal Revenue Code (IRC) section 412 – Minimum Funding Standards 
– An enrolled actuary must certify the minimum required contribution for a plan for a plan year 
• Internal Revenue Code (IRC) sections 432/436 – Actuarial Zone Certification for 
Multiemployer Plans and Funding-Based Limits on Benefits and Benefit Accruals 
Under Single-Employer Plans 
– An enrolled actuary must certify to the funded status of a plan for a plan year which will 
govern how the plan is operated for such plan year 
• An EA must sign Schedule SB/MB of Form 5500 setting out the plan's funded 
status 
6
Role of the Enrolled Actuary 
• Some other relevant IRC sections 
• 404 Deductible employer contributions to a deferred-payment plan 
• 412 Minimum funding standards 
• 413 Collectively bargained plans, etc. 
• 418 Multiemployer plan reorganization rules 
• 430 Minimum funding requirements for single-employer defined benefit 
pension plans 
• 431 Minimum funding requirements for multiemployer defined benefit 
plans 
• 432 Additional funding rules for multiemployer plans in endangered status 
or critical status 
• 436 Funding-based limits on benefits and benefit accruals under single-employer 
plans 
7
ASOPs
Actuarial Standards of Practice (ASOPs) 
• Enrolled Actuaries must ensure they follow ASOPs pertaining to 
pension plans as issued by the Actuarial Standards Board (ASB) 
• To name a few…. 
• ASOP 4 – Measuring Pension Obligations and Determining Pension Plan Costs or 
Contributions 
• ASOP 27 – Selection of Economic Assumptions for Measuring Pension Obligations 
• ASOP 35 – Selection of Demographic Assumptions and other Noneconomic 
Assumptions for Measuring Pension Obligations 
9
ASOP 4 – Measuring Pension Obligations 
The actuary may be required to make judgments or recommendations on 
the choice of actuarial assumptions, actuarial cost methods, asset 
valuation methods, and amortization methods 
• The actuary may have the responsibility and authority to select some or 
all assumptions 
or 
• The actuary may be asked to advise the individuals who have that 
responsibility and authority 
or 
• The actuary may perform actuarial calculations using assumptions or 
methods prescribed by applicable law or selected by others 
ASOP No. 4 addresses actuarial cost methods and provides guidance for 
coordinating and integrating all of these elements of an actuarial valuation 
of a plan. 
10
Actuarial Assumptions 
Actuary’s best estimate 
of occurrence of future 
events and those 
prescribed 
Reflects sponsor’s 
knowledge of special 
situations 
Reflects past 
experience 
Used to determine 
funding and accounting 
requirements 
11
Actuarial Assumptions 
• Pension obligation values incorporate assumptions about pension 
payment commencement, duration, and amount 
• They also require discount rates to convert future expected payments 
into present values 
Economic assumptions are covered under ASOP No. 27 
Noneconomic assumptions are covered under ASOP No. 35 
12
ASOP 27 - Economic Assumptions 
• The actuary should consider the following factors when identifying the 
types of economic assumptions to use for a specific measurement: 
– the purpose of the measurement 
– the characteristics of the obligation to be measured 
– materiality of the assumption to the measurement 
• Each economic assumption should be consistent with every other 
economic assumption for the measurement period 
13
ASOP 27 - Economic Assumptions 
Some examples of economic assumptions that affect the measurement of pension 
obligations are the following: 
Discount rate – rate used to calculate the present value of expected future plan 
payments, this may be a single rate or a series of rates 
Inflation rate – general economic inflation, defined as price changes over the whole 
of the economy 
Investment return – anticipated returns on the plan’s current and, if appropriate for 
the measurement, future assets 
Compensation increase – assumed year-to-year change in compensation, generally, 
a participant’s compensation will increase over the long term in accordance with 
inflation, productivity growth and merit increases 
14
ASOP 35 - Demographic Assumptions 
• The actuary should use professional judgment to estimate possible 
future outcomes based on past experience and future expectations 
• Reasonable demographic assumptions based on the particular 
characteristics of the defined benefit plan should be selected 
• A reasonable assumption is one that is expected to appropriately model 
the contingency being measured and is not anticipated to produce 
significant cumulative actuarial gains or losses over the measurement 
period 
15
ASOP 35 - Demographic Assumptions 
Some examples of demographic assumptions that affect the measurement of 
pension obligations are the following: 
Retirement rates – probability that a participant will retire at any given age once 
eligible to do so under the plan provisions 
Termination rates – probability that a participant will terminate employment at any 
given age prior to becoming eligible to retire under the plan provisions 
Mortality rates – probability that a participant will die at any given age 
Optional Form of Benefit Election rates – probability that a participant will elect a 
specific form of payment upon commencement of benefit from the plan 
Input from the plan sponsor is critical in helping to set these assumptions 
e.g., the introduction of an early retirement subsidy could influence the plan’s 
incidence of retirement 
16
Purpose of Experience Studies 
• Comparison of actual plan experience with actuarial assumptions 
• Generally performed every 3 to 5 years 
• Watch for trends (e.g. improving mortality, changes in retirement 
patterns) 
• Adjust for special events which occurred during investigation period 
(e.g. early retirement windows/reduction in force) 
• Modify assumptions as needed 
Auditors have been asking more frequently for the basis of demographic 
assumptions and specifically whether and when an experience study 
has been done 
17
Effect on Liabilities and Contributions 
Due to Changes in Major Assumptions 
Assumption Action Usual Liability Effect 
18 
Discount Rate 
Inflation Rate 
Retirement Rate Retire younger 
Turnover Rate More terminations
Funding Requirements
Introduction to Pension Funding 
Governed by laws in the Internal Revenue Code (IRC) which determine 
the annual minimum required contribution and maximum tax-deductible 
contribution 
• Pre-funding required under IRC to secure benefits and maintain a US tax-qualified 
plan status (IRC 430 and IRC 431) 
• Maximum tax-deductible limit to prevent the “pension piggy bank” (IRC 404) 
Actuarial method and certain assumptions prescribed by IRC 
20
Introduction to Pension Funding 
The Pension Protection Act of 2006 (PPA) was signed into law on 
August 17, 2006 
• Most comprehensive reform of pension laws since the enactment of 
ERISA 
• Designed to increase the minimum funding requirements and 
strengthen the pension insurance system (PBGC) 
• Effective for plan years beginning in 2008 
• Changed the landscape of funding rules 
21
Key Definitions/Terms 
Actuarial Accrued Liability (AAL): present value of a plan’s accrued benefits based on the plan’s 
funding method 
Funding Target (FT): mandated AAL for single employer plans 
Normal Cost (NC): present value of benefits expected to accrue during the plan year based on 
the plan’s funding method. 
Target Normal Cost (TNC): NC for single employer plans using mandated funding method. 
– Includes effect of expected increases in compensation and estimated expenses during the 
coming year 
Actuarial Value of Assets (AVA): 
• Market Value of Assets (MVA) unless averaging elected 
• Single Employer: Averaging up to 24 months; must fall within a corridor of 90% to 110% of MVA 
• Multiemployer: Averaging up to 5 years; must fall within a corridor of 80% to 120% of MVA 
Funding Shortfall: excess, if any, of the funding target over the value of plan assets as of the 
valuation date 
22
Key Definitions/Terms (continued) 
Yield Curve: Each month the IRS publishes its yield curve, segment rates, 
and 24-month average segment rates based on yields of high quality corporate 
bonds rated A or better 
– Segment rates are the average of spot rates for the first 5 years, next 15 years, and 
after 20 years 
– Can elect to use full yield curve (without 24 month average) 
Effective interest rate: single interest rate that produces the same funding target as 
that produced in the valuation using segment rates or full yield curve 
23
Funding Comparison 
Assumption 
& Methods 
Single Employer Multiemployer 
Interest Mandated: Segment Rate or 
Yield Curve 
Actuary’s Assumption: Long term 
expected return on plan assets 
Mortality Mandated: Generational/Static 
(can use plan specific) 
Actuary’s Assumption 
Funding Method Mandated Varies 
Asset Method Up to 24 month averaging with 
90%-110% corridor 
Up to 5 year smoothing with 80% - 
120% corridor 
Lump Sum Interest Same as funding Actuary’s Assumption 
Amortization Period 7 years 10 or 15 years depending on type 
of base (can have extensions) 
24
Key Elements of Funding Rules 
Single Employer Multiemployer 
Minimum contribution Minimum contribution 
Maximum contribution Maximum contribution 
“At-Risk” Status Reorganization Status 
AFTAP Certification Actuarial Certification 
Benefit Limitations Zone Statuses 
25
Single Employer Funding 
Minimum Required Contributions (MRC) 
• Minimum contribution is the sum of: 
– Target normal cost : funding future liabilities year by year 
– Shortfall amortization charge (seven-year amortization): funding past liabilities 
• If asset value exceeds funding target, the target normal cost will be reduced by this 
excess 
26
Single Employer Funding 
Minimum Required Contributions (MRC) – Timing 
• Quarterly Installments 
– Required if plan is less than 100% funded 
– Each required quarterly installment equals 25% of the lesser of A and B: 
A = 90% of the MRC for the current plan year 
B = 100% of the MRC for the prior plan year 
– Installments for a calendar plan year are due by April 15th, July 15th, and October 
15th of the current year and January 15th of the following year 
• Final Installment 
– Due no later than September 15th following the end of the plan year 
– Remainder of MRC not paid via quarterly installments 
27
Single Employer Funding 
Maximum Tax-Deductible Contributions 
• Amount to bring assets up to funding target, plus “cushion” 
– 50% of funding target 
– Expected increase in funding target for: 
• Salary increases in pay related plan 
• Benefit increases in non-pay related plan 
• Increases in maximum benefit and compensation limits 
28
Single Employer Funding 
At-Risk Plans 
• Plan is deemed “at-risk” if the funded status for the preceding year falls below certain 
thresholds 
• Must use the “at-risk” assumptions for valuation 
– Assume employees eligible to retire in next 10 years will retire at earliest possible 
date and elect most valuable option 
• Results in higher minimum required contribution 
– Goal is to get the plan’s funded status up more quickly 
• At-risk status of plan must be disclosed in Annual Funding Notice 
• Funding of deferred compensation plans during periods when the pension plan is 
considered “at-risk” results in adverse tax consequences to deferred compensation 
plan participants 
29
Single Employer Funding 
AFTAP Certification 
• Adjusted Funding Target Attainment Percentage (AFTAP) is generally the ratio of plan 
assets to the funding target 
• IRC Section 436 places restrictions on certain benefits when a plan’s AFTAP falls below 
certain thresholds 
Condition Benefits Restricted 
AFTAP  80% Amendments that improve benefits cannot take effect 
unless plan sponsor makes a contribution to bring the 
AFTAP back up to 80% after the amendment 
80%  AFTAP  60% Accelerated benefit distributions (i.e. lump sum payments) 
are partially restricted 
AFTAP  60% Accelerated benefit distributions (i.e. lump sum payments) 
are fully restricted 
Benefit accruals are frozen 
Shutdown benefits cannot be paid 
• Each year the plan’s enrolled actuary must sign an AFTAP certification which determines 
whether any benefit restrictions apply to the plan year 
30
Multiemployer Funding 
Minimum Required Contributions 
Minimum Required Contribution = Charges - Credits 
• Charges: Credits: 
Funding Deficiency Credit Balance 
+ Normal Cost + Amortization Credits 
+ Amortization Charges + Full Funding Credits 
+ Interest to end of year + Interest to end of year 
• For plans in critical status (not endangered), excise taxes waived in event of 
funding deficiency 
• Shortfall Funding Method - Multiemployer plans generally cannot assess 
employers for additional contributions to meet minimum funding requirement. 
Adoption of shortfall method is a funding method change. 
31
Multiemployer Funding 
Maximum Tax Deductible Contributions 
Maximum Tax Deductible Contribution = 
1) Normal Cost + 10 year Amortization of Unfunded AAL. 
2) Full Funding Limit = Greater of RPA and ERISA Full Funding Limits 
3) Lesser of 1 and 2 
4) 140% RPA Unfunded Current Liability, not less than MRC 
5) Greater of 3 and 4 
32
Multiemployer Funding 
Reorganization Status 
Reorganization Status 
• Definition of reorganization: Vested Benefit Charge  Net Charge to FSA 
– Vested Benefit Charge = 10 year amortization of unfunded pays status benefits + 
25 year amortization of non-pay status benefits 
• apply assets to pay status benefits first 
• Consequences of Reorganization 
– Minimum Contribution Requirements 
– Potential reductions in vested benefits 
– Post-PPA ’06: projected insolvency determination every 5 years 
33
Multiemployer Actuarial Certification 
Under IRC 432, fund actuary is required to certify annually to a 
multiemployer plan’s zone status by the 90th day of plan year. 
• Not Critical or Endangered 
• No Waivers for MRC Green Zone 
• Endangered/Seriously Endangered 
• Funding Improvement Plan Yellow Zone 
• Critical/Seriously Critical 
• Rehabilitation Plan Red Zone 
34
Multiemployer Funding 
Actuarial Certification 
Actuarial Certification is based on projections using: 
• Liabilities from most recent valuations completed (prior 
valuation results) reflecting any significant changes that have 
occurred during the year 
• Current asset information 
• Projected Industry Activity from Trustees 
• Contribution rates and benefit accruals under current Collective 
Bargaining Agreements (CBAs)/Rehabilitation Plan/Funding 
Improvement Plan 
Funding percentages based on Unit Credit 
35
Multiemployer Funding 
Actuarial Certification 
Red Zone (Critical Status): 
I. Funded % less than 65% AND 
(MVA + contributions over next 7 years)  
(benefits and administrative expenses over next 7 years) 
OR 
II. Projected to have funding deficiency within 4 years 
(5 years if Funded % = 65%) 
OR 
III. (Normal Cost + interest on unfunded liability)  contributions AND 
PV inactive benefits  PV active benefits AND 
Projected to have funding deficiency within 5 years 
OR 
IV. (MVA + PV 5 years of contributions)  
(PV 5 years of benefits + administrative expenses) 
36
Multiemployer Funding 
Actuarial Certification 
Yellow Zone (Endangered Status): 
Not in Critical Status and 
I. Funded %  80% 
OR 
II. Expected to have funding deficiency within 7 plan years 
Seriously Endangered Status: 
Meets both conditions I. and II. for Endangered Status 
37
Multiemployer Funding 
Zone Statuses 
Red Zone (Critical Status): 
• Automatic removal of non-increasing annuity forms (lump sums) 
with exception of corrective retroactive payment 
• Adjustable Benefits – Trustees can remove benefits otherwise 
protected under 411(d) but cannot : 
– Change normal retirement age / Reduce normal retirement benefit 
– For retirees in pay status, benefits payable based on amendments in 
effect for less than 5 years may be adjusted, but only after retirees 
have received required notification of Actuarial Certification of initial 
year of Critical Status 
– Limitation on reduction to future accruals under default schedule – 
accrual rate cannot be less than smaller of: 
– Monthly normal retirement benefit equal to 1% of contributions or 
– Pre-Rehabilitation Plan accrual rate 
38
Multiemployer Funding 
Zone Statuses 
Yellow Zone (Endangered Status): 
• Can reduce future benefits 
• Can reduce/ remove unprotected benefits for those not currently in 
receipt (always an option) 
• No plan amendments increasing liabilities by: increasing benefits, 
changing accrual rates or accelerating vesting schedule 
– Amendments permitted if actuary certifies: 
i) amendment consistent with Funding Improvement Plan and 
ii) additional contributions were made to pay for cost 
39
Government Forms and Filings
Form 5500 – Actuarial Report 
The plan’s enrolled actuary must complete the Schedule SB / MB with 
attachments for a qualified defined benefit plans which summarizes 
actuarial results 
Schedule SB 
• Single employer and multiple employer plans 
Schedule MB 
• Multiemployer plans 
• Report progress of funding improvement /rehabilitation plan 
41
ERISA 104(d) Notice (Multiemployer) 
Summary of Plan Information for Employers and Unions: 
Plan must provide report to each union and contributing employer: 
Description of contribution and benefit schedules 
Information reported on the Schedule R of the Form 5500 
Endangered or Critical Status Information 
Notice of right to copy of Form 5500 
Summary plan description 
Summary of any material modifications 
42
PBGC – Annual Premium Filings 
PBGC is the insurance agency for defined benefit pension established in 1974. 
Separate trusts for single and multiemployer plans. 
Single Employer Plans Multiemployer Plans 
Year Flat Rate Variable Rate Flat Rate 
43 
Premium 
(Per Participant) 
Premium 
(% of UVB) 
Cap 
(Per Part.) 
Premium 
(Per Participant) 
2016* $64.00 2.9% $500 $12.00 
2015* $57.00 2.4% $412 $12.00 
2014 $49.00 1.4% $412 $12.00 
Select Historical Premiums 
2007 $31.00 0.9% -- $8.00 
2005 $19.00 0.9% -- $2.60 
1984 $2.60 -- -- $1.40 
1974 $1.00 -- -- $0.50 
* Subject to indexing
PBGC – Coverage 
Coverage for basic benefits at normal retirement age, most early retirement 
benefits, annuity benefits for survivors of plan participants, and disability benefits. 
Maximum monthly benefit guarantee varies by age and form of payment. Varies 
by years of service for multiemployer plans. 
Single Employer Plans Multiemployer Plans* 
Year Maximum Monthly Guaranteed Benefits 
2014 $4,843.18 $1,072.50 
Select Historical Maximum Monthly Guaranteed Benefits 
2007 $4,125.00 $487.50 
2005 $3,698.86 $487.50 
1984 $2,556.82 $487.50 
1980 $2,164.77 $487.50 
*100% of first $11/month per year of service, plus 75% of next $33/month per year of service 
with a maximum of $35.75/month. 
44
PBGC Filing Requirements – 4010 Filing 
• An FTAP that is less than 80% for any plan sponsored by the Company 
triggers an ERISA §4010 filing for the plan year 
• Exempt from filing if aggregated unfunded liability is less than $15M 
45
Notices to Participants – Annual Funding Notices 
PPA requires the administrator of a ALL defined benefit plan that is 
insured by the PBGC to provide an annual notice of plan funding to all 
participants and beneficiaries under the plan 
• Provided to active participants, current retirees, beneficiaries of 
deceased retirees, and terminated participants with a vested right 
to future benefits 
• Provided to all labor unions representing any participant or 
beneficiary 
• Provided no later than 120 days after the end of the plan year, 
which is April 30th for plans with a calendar year plan year 
• Includes information about the Plan’s assets and liabilities, how 
Plan assets are allocated among different categories of 
investments, the Company’s investment and funding policies, and 
participant rights and protections 
46
Recent Legislation/Hot Topics
Funding Relief 
Effective January 1, 2012 the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st 
Century Act (MAP-21) added collars to segment rates 
– Based on 25 year average of each of the segment rates as of September 30 of the 
preceding calendar year 
• Collar is based on the valuation year 
Valuation Year Min Max 
2012 90% 110% 
2013 85% 115% 
2014 80% 120% 
2015 75% 125% 
2016+ 70% 130% 
• Only applies to the minimum contribution, FTAP and AFTAP 
48
Funding Relief 
The Highway and Transportation Funding Act (HATFA) was signed into law 
on August 8, 2014 
– The 90 to 110% corridor under MAP-21 was extended through 2017, with the 5% 
adjustments beginning in 2018 
Plan Year 
Beginning MAP-21 HATFA 
2012 90 to 110% 
90 to 110% 
2013 85 to 115% 
2014 80 to 120% 
2015 75 to 125% 
2016 
2017 
2018 85 to 115% 
70 to 130% 
2019 80 to 120% 
2020 75 to 125% 
2021 and later 70 to 130% 
Plan sponsors are permitted to delay using the new rates to 2014 plan years to 
avoid revising valuation work and plan operations during 2013 
As with the original MAP-21 choices, employers are permitted to limit the delay 
to only section 436 benefit restrictions 
49
Funding Relief 
Funding relief and the Annual Funding Notice (AFN) 
• MAP-21 Supplement 
• Required when 
– A plan’s funded ratio without regard to MAP-21 is less than 95%, and 
– Funding shortfall is greater than $500,000, and 
– There are at least 50 participants in the plan 
• Not required for plan years beginning on or after January 1, 2015 
• Supplement shows the plan’s MRC and funded status without regard 
to MAP-21 
• DOL issued Field Assistance Bulletin (FAB) No. 2013-11 on March 8, 
2013 containing a model MAP-21 Supplement 
No guidance has been issued for HATFA yet, expectation is that supplement will be 
required beyond 2015 and model language will be updated to cover HATFA 
50
Mortality Table Update 
Mortality assumption used to determine how long plan participants are 
expected to live and collect their pension. Also used to determine the value 
of lump sum payments. 
Society of Actuaries (SOA) studies US mortality trends and develops tables 
for pension plan actuarial valuations 
SOA has been working on updated tables for uninsured pension plan 
experience since 2009 
Current IRS prescribed mortality table uses 2000 as the base year with 
projected improvements 
51
Mortality Table Update 
RP-2014 and MP-2014 Background 
Current study used participant data for years 2004 through 2008 
• Over 10.5 million life-years of exposure 
• Over 220,000 deaths 
• Results of study projected to 2014 based on observed rates of annual 
improvement 
Study also analyzed improvement in mortality over time 
• Finds that mortality is improving faster than expected based on prior 
studies 
• Finds that rates of improvement are accelerating 
e.g., people now age 50 are expected to have more improvement after 
age 60 than a person now age 60 
52
Mortality Table Update 
Impact and Timing 
New tables will generally increase pension liabilities by 6-10% 
Final tables expected to be published by the end of October 2014 
• Audit firms are likely to expect/question/push for adoption for 2014 
year-end disclosure 
• IRS unlikely to adopt new table for funding until 2016, due to drag in 
required regulatory process 
• New table will likely take effect for qualified plan administration 
(417(e) lump sums) at same time as funding 
53
PPA Sunset – Multiemployer Plans 
PPA is set to sunset at the end of 2014 
Written into the act is sunset provisions which state that plans operating 
under a rehabilitation or funding improvement plan upon expiration of PPA 
will continue to do so upon the sunset of the law. 
1 year extension has been included as part of legislation considered 
during 2014, but nothing passed. Currently unclear whether Congress will 
act before the end of 2014. 
54
NCCMP Proposal 
NCCMP “Solutions, Not Bailouts” 
• itemizes the severe funding deficiencies of multiemployer plans and the 
multiemployer PBGC fund that insures these plans 
• outlines several potential solutions including encouraging plan mergers, 
alternate plan design… 
• but most controversial the ability to reduce the benefits for those 
currently in receipt of benefits 
55
QA 
56
Presenters 
José M. Jara, JD, LLM Shirley Cheung, FSA, EA, MAAA 
Principal, National Practice Leader Multiemployer Plans Director, Retirement 
Wealth Practice Wealth Practice 
Buck Consultants, LLC, A Xerox Company Buck Consultants, LLC, A Xerox Company 
Jose.Jara@xerox.com Shirley.Cheung@xerox.com 
212.330.1114 212.330.1029 
Suzanne Hughes, ASA, EA, MAAA Melissa M. Conklin 
Director, Retirement Senior Consultant, Retirement 
Wealth Practice Wealth Practice 
Buck Consultants, LLC, A Xerox Company Buck Consultants, LLC, A Xerox Company 
Suzanne.Hughes@xerox.com Melissa.Conklin@xerox.com 
201.902.2615 201.553.6317 
57

More Related Content

What's hot

Fiscal management
Fiscal managementFiscal management
Fiscal managementMrsHRivera
 
Budgeting system, Line-Item, Lump sum and PPBS
Budgeting system, Line-Item, Lump sum and PPBSBudgeting system, Line-Item, Lump sum and PPBS
Budgeting system, Line-Item, Lump sum and PPBSrey castro
 
Performance Budgeting - Key Performance Indicators -- Wojciech ZIELINSKI, OECD
Performance Budgeting - Key Performance Indicators -- Wojciech ZIELINSKI, OECDPerformance Budgeting - Key Performance Indicators -- Wojciech ZIELINSKI, OECD
Performance Budgeting - Key Performance Indicators -- Wojciech ZIELINSKI, OECDOECD Governance
 
Not-for-Profit Financial Reporting: How to Convert Your Financial Statements ...
Not-for-Profit Financial Reporting: How to Convert Your Financial Statements ...Not-for-Profit Financial Reporting: How to Convert Your Financial Statements ...
Not-for-Profit Financial Reporting: How to Convert Your Financial Statements ...McKonly & Asbury, LLP
 
Budget process
Budget processBudget process
Budget processzhayou Xia
 
Financial and Operating Plan - A Tool for Strategic Municipal Investment and ...
Financial and Operating Plan - A Tool for Strategic Municipal Investment and ...Financial and Operating Plan - A Tool for Strategic Municipal Investment and ...
Financial and Operating Plan - A Tool for Strategic Municipal Investment and ...Ravikant Joshi
 
Implementing Appropriate and Timely Corrective Actions
Implementing Appropriate and Timely Corrective ActionsImplementing Appropriate and Timely Corrective Actions
Implementing Appropriate and Timely Corrective ActionsDiane Bradley
 
Approaches and techniques in budgeting
Approaches and techniques   in budgetingApproaches and techniques   in budgeting
Approaches and techniques in budgetingG-nohj Odrareg
 
Governmental Auditing Updates
Governmental Auditing UpdatesGovernmental Auditing Updates
Governmental Auditing UpdatesDiane Bradley
 
Altus Alliance 2016 - Performance-based Budgeting with Questica
Altus Alliance 2016 - Performance-based Budgeting with QuesticaAltus Alliance 2016 - Performance-based Budgeting with Questica
Altus Alliance 2016 - Performance-based Budgeting with QuesticaSparkrock
 
Local Planning, Budgeting, Fiscal Discipline
Local Planning, Budgeting, Fiscal Discipline  Local Planning, Budgeting, Fiscal Discipline
Local Planning, Budgeting, Fiscal Discipline Ravikant Joshi
 
Budgetary procedures
Budgetary proceduresBudgetary procedures
Budgetary proceduresabelsoft's
 
Financial Planning for Local Governments
Financial Planning for Local GovernmentsFinancial Planning for Local Governments
Financial Planning for Local GovernmentsRavikant Joshi
 
There is No such Thing as Free Federal Money - Federal Expenditures and SEFAs
There is No such Thing as Free Federal Money - Federal Expenditures and SEFAsThere is No such Thing as Free Federal Money - Federal Expenditures and SEFAs
There is No such Thing as Free Federal Money - Federal Expenditures and SEFAsDiane Bradley
 
Planning and Budget Training (May 2010)
Planning and Budget Training (May 2010)Planning and Budget Training (May 2010)
Planning and Budget Training (May 2010)Patrick Reed
 
Philippine performance-informed budgeting system, Department of budget and ma...
Philippine performance-informed budgeting system, Department of budget and ma...Philippine performance-informed budgeting system, Department of budget and ma...
Philippine performance-informed budgeting system, Department of budget and ma...OECD Governance
 

What's hot (20)

Fiscal management
Fiscal managementFiscal management
Fiscal management
 
Budgeting system, Line-Item, Lump sum and PPBS
Budgeting system, Line-Item, Lump sum and PPBSBudgeting system, Line-Item, Lump sum and PPBS
Budgeting system, Line-Item, Lump sum and PPBS
 
Performance Budgeting - Key Performance Indicators -- Wojciech ZIELINSKI, OECD
Performance Budgeting - Key Performance Indicators -- Wojciech ZIELINSKI, OECDPerformance Budgeting - Key Performance Indicators -- Wojciech ZIELINSKI, OECD
Performance Budgeting - Key Performance Indicators -- Wojciech ZIELINSKI, OECD
 
Not-for-Profit Financial Reporting: How to Convert Your Financial Statements ...
Not-for-Profit Financial Reporting: How to Convert Your Financial Statements ...Not-for-Profit Financial Reporting: How to Convert Your Financial Statements ...
Not-for-Profit Financial Reporting: How to Convert Your Financial Statements ...
 
Ppbs 2011
Ppbs 2011Ppbs 2011
Ppbs 2011
 
Budget process
Budget processBudget process
Budget process
 
National budget
National budgetNational budget
National budget
 
Financial and Operating Plan - A Tool for Strategic Municipal Investment and ...
Financial and Operating Plan - A Tool for Strategic Municipal Investment and ...Financial and Operating Plan - A Tool for Strategic Municipal Investment and ...
Financial and Operating Plan - A Tool for Strategic Municipal Investment and ...
 
Budget cycle in pakistan
Budget cycle in pakistanBudget cycle in pakistan
Budget cycle in pakistan
 
Budget cycle
Budget cycleBudget cycle
Budget cycle
 
Implementing Appropriate and Timely Corrective Actions
Implementing Appropriate and Timely Corrective ActionsImplementing Appropriate and Timely Corrective Actions
Implementing Appropriate and Timely Corrective Actions
 
Approaches and techniques in budgeting
Approaches and techniques   in budgetingApproaches and techniques   in budgeting
Approaches and techniques in budgeting
 
Governmental Auditing Updates
Governmental Auditing UpdatesGovernmental Auditing Updates
Governmental Auditing Updates
 
Altus Alliance 2016 - Performance-based Budgeting with Questica
Altus Alliance 2016 - Performance-based Budgeting with QuesticaAltus Alliance 2016 - Performance-based Budgeting with Questica
Altus Alliance 2016 - Performance-based Budgeting with Questica
 
Local Planning, Budgeting, Fiscal Discipline
Local Planning, Budgeting, Fiscal Discipline  Local Planning, Budgeting, Fiscal Discipline
Local Planning, Budgeting, Fiscal Discipline
 
Budgetary procedures
Budgetary proceduresBudgetary procedures
Budgetary procedures
 
Financial Planning for Local Governments
Financial Planning for Local GovernmentsFinancial Planning for Local Governments
Financial Planning for Local Governments
 
There is No such Thing as Free Federal Money - Federal Expenditures and SEFAs
There is No such Thing as Free Federal Money - Federal Expenditures and SEFAsThere is No such Thing as Free Federal Money - Federal Expenditures and SEFAs
There is No such Thing as Free Federal Money - Federal Expenditures and SEFAs
 
Planning and Budget Training (May 2010)
Planning and Budget Training (May 2010)Planning and Budget Training (May 2010)
Planning and Budget Training (May 2010)
 
Philippine performance-informed budgeting system, Department of budget and ma...
Philippine performance-informed budgeting system, Department of budget and ma...Philippine performance-informed budgeting system, Department of budget and ma...
Philippine performance-informed budgeting system, Department of budget and ma...
 

Similar to Web presentation 10162014 understanding your actuaries

Dodd-Frank Update: Overview of Remaining Open Items
Dodd-Frank Update: Overview of Remaining Open ItemsDodd-Frank Update: Overview of Remaining Open Items
Dodd-Frank Update: Overview of Remaining Open ItemsSteve Hall
 
Fee Policy Statement Kit: Best Practices for Managing Plan Expenses - Brian B...
Fee Policy Statement Kit: Best Practices for Managing Plan Expenses - Brian B...Fee Policy Statement Kit: Best Practices for Managing Plan Expenses - Brian B...
Fee Policy Statement Kit: Best Practices for Managing Plan Expenses - Brian B...BPAS
 
SEC Adopts Enhanced Compensation and Corporate Governance Proxy Disclosure Ru...
SEC Adopts Enhanced Compensation and Corporate Governance Proxy Disclosure Ru...SEC Adopts Enhanced Compensation and Corporate Governance Proxy Disclosure Ru...
SEC Adopts Enhanced Compensation and Corporate Governance Proxy Disclosure Ru...John Newell
 
Small Business Retirement Plans
Small Business Retirement PlansSmall Business Retirement Plans
Small Business Retirement Plansmrbeckerphd
 
GASB's New Rules on Uniformity and Disclosure
GASB's New Rules on Uniformity and Disclosure GASB's New Rules on Uniformity and Disclosure
GASB's New Rules on Uniformity and Disclosure CBIZ, Inc.
 
Navigating Your 401(k) Audit
Navigating Your 401(k) AuditNavigating Your 401(k) Audit
Navigating Your 401(k) AuditSkoda Minotti
 
Navigating Your 401(k) Audit
Navigating Your 401(k) AuditNavigating Your 401(k) Audit
Navigating Your 401(k) AuditSkoda Minotti
 
Dodd-Frank Executive Compensation Update – Rounding the Final Turn?
Dodd-Frank Executive Compensation Update – Rounding the Final Turn? Dodd-Frank Executive Compensation Update – Rounding the Final Turn?
Dodd-Frank Executive Compensation Update – Rounding the Final Turn? Winston & Strawn LLP
 
Healthcare brief
Healthcare briefHealthcare brief
Healthcare briefRoger Royse
 
Revised web presentation 4 21-16 - oea
Revised web presentation 4 21-16 - oeaRevised web presentation 4 21-16 - oea
Revised web presentation 4 21-16 - oeaCarol Buckmann
 
ERISA 201: Advanced ERISA Compliance Review
ERISA 201: Advanced ERISA Compliance ReviewERISA 201: Advanced ERISA Compliance Review
ERISA 201: Advanced ERISA Compliance Reviewbenefitexpress
 
What Do The New Pension Accounting Rules Mean To Governmental DB Plans
What Do The New Pension Accounting Rules Mean To Governmental DB PlansWhat Do The New Pension Accounting Rules Mean To Governmental DB Plans
What Do The New Pension Accounting Rules Mean To Governmental DB PlansCBIZ, Inc.
 
Employee Categories_Benefit Plan Design
Employee Categories_Benefit Plan DesignEmployee Categories_Benefit Plan Design
Employee Categories_Benefit Plan DesignBass, Berry & Sims
 
Executive Compensation Checklist for New and Experienced Board Members (Credi...
Executive Compensation Checklist for New and Experienced Board Members (Credi...Executive Compensation Checklist for New and Experienced Board Members (Credi...
Executive Compensation Checklist for New and Experienced Board Members (Credi...NAFCU Services Corporation
 
New UK Reporting Regulations in force October 2013: What is a strategic report?
New UK Reporting Regulations in force October 2013: What is a strategic report? New UK Reporting Regulations in force October 2013: What is a strategic report?
New UK Reporting Regulations in force October 2013: What is a strategic report? Ardea International
 

Similar to Web presentation 10162014 understanding your actuaries (20)

Dodd-Frank Update: Overview of Remaining Open Items
Dodd-Frank Update: Overview of Remaining Open ItemsDodd-Frank Update: Overview of Remaining Open Items
Dodd-Frank Update: Overview of Remaining Open Items
 
Fee Policy Statement Kit: Best Practices for Managing Plan Expenses - Brian B...
Fee Policy Statement Kit: Best Practices for Managing Plan Expenses - Brian B...Fee Policy Statement Kit: Best Practices for Managing Plan Expenses - Brian B...
Fee Policy Statement Kit: Best Practices for Managing Plan Expenses - Brian B...
 
SEC Adopts Enhanced Compensation and Corporate Governance Proxy Disclosure Ru...
SEC Adopts Enhanced Compensation and Corporate Governance Proxy Disclosure Ru...SEC Adopts Enhanced Compensation and Corporate Governance Proxy Disclosure Ru...
SEC Adopts Enhanced Compensation and Corporate Governance Proxy Disclosure Ru...
 
Small Business Retirement Plans
Small Business Retirement PlansSmall Business Retirement Plans
Small Business Retirement Plans
 
GASB's New Rules on Uniformity and Disclosure
GASB's New Rules on Uniformity and Disclosure GASB's New Rules on Uniformity and Disclosure
GASB's New Rules on Uniformity and Disclosure
 
Navigating Your 401(k) Audit
Navigating Your 401(k) AuditNavigating Your 401(k) Audit
Navigating Your 401(k) Audit
 
Navigating Your 401(k) Audit
Navigating Your 401(k) AuditNavigating Your 401(k) Audit
Navigating Your 401(k) Audit
 
4 6pres Vrs
4 6pres Vrs4 6pres Vrs
4 6pres Vrs
 
Dodd-Frank Executive Compensation Update – Rounding the Final Turn?
Dodd-Frank Executive Compensation Update – Rounding the Final Turn? Dodd-Frank Executive Compensation Update – Rounding the Final Turn?
Dodd-Frank Executive Compensation Update – Rounding the Final Turn?
 
Webinar: Comprehensive End-Stage Renal Disease Care (CEC) Model – Finance and...
Webinar: Comprehensive End-Stage Renal Disease Care (CEC) Model – Finance and...Webinar: Comprehensive End-Stage Renal Disease Care (CEC) Model – Finance and...
Webinar: Comprehensive End-Stage Renal Disease Care (CEC) Model – Finance and...
 
Healthcare brief
Healthcare briefHealthcare brief
Healthcare brief
 
Revised web presentation 4 21-16 - oea
Revised web presentation 4 21-16 - oeaRevised web presentation 4 21-16 - oea
Revised web presentation 4 21-16 - oea
 
ERISA 201: Advanced ERISA Compliance Review
ERISA 201: Advanced ERISA Compliance ReviewERISA 201: Advanced ERISA Compliance Review
ERISA 201: Advanced ERISA Compliance Review
 
Open Door Forums: ACO Investment Model Question & Answer Session for 2015-201...
Open Door Forums: ACO Investment Model Question & Answer Session for 2015-201...Open Door Forums: ACO Investment Model Question & Answer Session for 2015-201...
Open Door Forums: ACO Investment Model Question & Answer Session for 2015-201...
 
What Do The New Pension Accounting Rules Mean To Governmental DB Plans
What Do The New Pension Accounting Rules Mean To Governmental DB PlansWhat Do The New Pension Accounting Rules Mean To Governmental DB Plans
What Do The New Pension Accounting Rules Mean To Governmental DB Plans
 
Employee Categories_Benefit Plan Design
Employee Categories_Benefit Plan DesignEmployee Categories_Benefit Plan Design
Employee Categories_Benefit Plan Design
 
Roadmap to ifrs
Roadmap to ifrsRoadmap to ifrs
Roadmap to ifrs
 
Lectures.pptx
Lectures.pptxLectures.pptx
Lectures.pptx
 
Executive Compensation Checklist for New and Experienced Board Members (Credi...
Executive Compensation Checklist for New and Experienced Board Members (Credi...Executive Compensation Checklist for New and Experienced Board Members (Credi...
Executive Compensation Checklist for New and Experienced Board Members (Credi...
 
New UK Reporting Regulations in force October 2013: What is a strategic report?
New UK Reporting Regulations in force October 2013: What is a strategic report? New UK Reporting Regulations in force October 2013: What is a strategic report?
New UK Reporting Regulations in force October 2013: What is a strategic report?
 

More from Carol Buckmann

Web presentation may 2019 (costin)
Web presentation may 2019 (costin)Web presentation may 2019 (costin)
Web presentation may 2019 (costin)Carol Buckmann
 
Fin well sponsor presentation may 2019-web nyc
Fin well   sponsor presentation may 2019-web nycFin well   sponsor presentation may 2019-web nyc
Fin well sponsor presentation may 2019-web nycCarol Buckmann
 
032119 -als--best practices prsn
032119 -als--best practices prsn032119 -als--best practices prsn
032119 -als--best practices prsnCarol Buckmann
 
Operating in compliance. understanding irs and dol audit hot button issues an...
Operating in compliance. understanding irs and dol audit hot button issues an...Operating in compliance. understanding irs and dol audit hot button issues an...
Operating in compliance. understanding irs and dol audit hot button issues an...Carol Buckmann
 
Operating in compliance. understanding irs and dol audit hot button issues an...
Operating in compliance. understanding irs and dol audit hot button issues an...Operating in compliance. understanding irs and dol audit hot button issues an...
Operating in compliance. understanding irs and dol audit hot button issues an...Carol Buckmann
 
Pw c web 06.21.2018 final
Pw c web 06.21.2018 finalPw c web 06.21.2018 final
Pw c web 06.21.2018 finalCarol Buckmann
 
Conduent pw c_web (06-21-18) nsformatted (formatted)rev 6-20
Conduent pw c_web (06-21-18) nsformatted (formatted)rev 6-20Conduent pw c_web (06-21-18) nsformatted (formatted)rev 6-20
Conduent pw c_web (06-21-18) nsformatted (formatted)rev 6-20Carol Buckmann
 
Web 05172018 Health Plan Hot Spots
Web 05172018  Health Plan Hot SpotsWeb 05172018  Health Plan Hot Spots
Web 05172018 Health Plan Hot SpotsCarol Buckmann
 
Retirement Plans Under Attack-What Are Plan Sponsors Doing Now?
Retirement Plans Under Attack-What Are Plan Sponsors Doing Now?Retirement Plans Under Attack-What Are Plan Sponsors Doing Now?
Retirement Plans Under Attack-What Are Plan Sponsors Doing Now?Carol Buckmann
 
Protecting Fiduciaries: ERISA Insurance, Bonding, and More
Protecting Fiduciaries: ERISA Insurance, Bonding, and MoreProtecting Fiduciaries: ERISA Insurance, Bonding, and More
Protecting Fiduciaries: ERISA Insurance, Bonding, and MoreCarol Buckmann
 
Web ny chapter tax reform legislation presentation
Web ny chapter   tax reform legislation presentationWeb ny chapter   tax reform legislation presentation
Web ny chapter tax reform legislation presentationCarol Buckmann
 
Nyc WEB-What's Keeping Plan Sponsors Up at Night
Nyc WEB-What's Keeping Plan Sponsors Up at NightNyc WEB-What's Keeping Plan Sponsors Up at Night
Nyc WEB-What's Keeping Plan Sponsors Up at NightCarol Buckmann
 
Pwc nyc web 06.22.2017
Pwc   nyc web 06.22.2017Pwc   nyc web 06.22.2017
Pwc nyc web 06.22.2017Carol Buckmann
 
Conduent pw c_web june 2017 (revised deck 6-21-17(mary m)
Conduent pw c_web june 2017 (revised deck 6-21-17(mary m)Conduent pw c_web june 2017 (revised deck 6-21-17(mary m)
Conduent pw c_web june 2017 (revised deck 6-21-17(mary m)Carol Buckmann
 
Withdrawal liability the great imposition on contributing employers - ... -...
Withdrawal liability   the great imposition on contributing employers - ... -...Withdrawal liability   the great imposition on contributing employers - ... -...
Withdrawal liability the great imposition on contributing employers - ... -...Carol Buckmann
 
Webny presentation april 20, 2017
Webny presentation    april 20, 2017Webny presentation    april 20, 2017
Webny presentation april 20, 2017Carol Buckmann
 
Ny web presentation 1(1)
Ny web presentation 1(1)Ny web presentation 1(1)
Ny web presentation 1(1)Carol Buckmann
 
Richard Schwartz Interview
Richard Schwartz InterviewRichard Schwartz Interview
Richard Schwartz InterviewCarol Buckmann
 

More from Carol Buckmann (20)

Pw c web june 2019
Pw c web june 2019Pw c web june 2019
Pw c web june 2019
 
Web presentation may 2019 (costin)
Web presentation may 2019 (costin)Web presentation may 2019 (costin)
Web presentation may 2019 (costin)
 
Fin well sponsor presentation may 2019-web nyc
Fin well   sponsor presentation may 2019-web nycFin well   sponsor presentation may 2019-web nyc
Fin well sponsor presentation may 2019-web nyc
 
Webny 04182019 final
Webny 04182019   finalWebny 04182019   final
Webny 04182019 final
 
032119 -als--best practices prsn
032119 -als--best practices prsn032119 -als--best practices prsn
032119 -als--best practices prsn
 
Operating in compliance. understanding irs and dol audit hot button issues an...
Operating in compliance. understanding irs and dol audit hot button issues an...Operating in compliance. understanding irs and dol audit hot button issues an...
Operating in compliance. understanding irs and dol audit hot button issues an...
 
Operating in compliance. understanding irs and dol audit hot button issues an...
Operating in compliance. understanding irs and dol audit hot button issues an...Operating in compliance. understanding irs and dol audit hot button issues an...
Operating in compliance. understanding irs and dol audit hot button issues an...
 
Pw c web 06.21.2018 final
Pw c web 06.21.2018 finalPw c web 06.21.2018 final
Pw c web 06.21.2018 final
 
Conduent pw c_web (06-21-18) nsformatted (formatted)rev 6-20
Conduent pw c_web (06-21-18) nsformatted (formatted)rev 6-20Conduent pw c_web (06-21-18) nsformatted (formatted)rev 6-20
Conduent pw c_web (06-21-18) nsformatted (formatted)rev 6-20
 
Web 05172018 Health Plan Hot Spots
Web 05172018  Health Plan Hot SpotsWeb 05172018  Health Plan Hot Spots
Web 05172018 Health Plan Hot Spots
 
Retirement Plans Under Attack-What Are Plan Sponsors Doing Now?
Retirement Plans Under Attack-What Are Plan Sponsors Doing Now?Retirement Plans Under Attack-What Are Plan Sponsors Doing Now?
Retirement Plans Under Attack-What Are Plan Sponsors Doing Now?
 
Protecting Fiduciaries: ERISA Insurance, Bonding, and More
Protecting Fiduciaries: ERISA Insurance, Bonding, and MoreProtecting Fiduciaries: ERISA Insurance, Bonding, and More
Protecting Fiduciaries: ERISA Insurance, Bonding, and More
 
Web ny chapter tax reform legislation presentation
Web ny chapter   tax reform legislation presentationWeb ny chapter   tax reform legislation presentation
Web ny chapter tax reform legislation presentation
 
Nyc WEB-What's Keeping Plan Sponsors Up at Night
Nyc WEB-What's Keeping Plan Sponsors Up at NightNyc WEB-What's Keeping Plan Sponsors Up at Night
Nyc WEB-What's Keeping Plan Sponsors Up at Night
 
Pwc nyc web 06.22.2017
Pwc   nyc web 06.22.2017Pwc   nyc web 06.22.2017
Pwc nyc web 06.22.2017
 
Conduent pw c_web june 2017 (revised deck 6-21-17(mary m)
Conduent pw c_web june 2017 (revised deck 6-21-17(mary m)Conduent pw c_web june 2017 (revised deck 6-21-17(mary m)
Conduent pw c_web june 2017 (revised deck 6-21-17(mary m)
 
Withdrawal liability the great imposition on contributing employers - ... -...
Withdrawal liability   the great imposition on contributing employers - ... -...Withdrawal liability   the great imposition on contributing employers - ... -...
Withdrawal liability the great imposition on contributing employers - ... -...
 
Webny presentation april 20, 2017
Webny presentation    april 20, 2017Webny presentation    april 20, 2017
Webny presentation april 20, 2017
 
Ny web presentation 1(1)
Ny web presentation 1(1)Ny web presentation 1(1)
Ny web presentation 1(1)
 
Richard Schwartz Interview
Richard Schwartz InterviewRichard Schwartz Interview
Richard Schwartz Interview
 

Web presentation 10162014 understanding your actuaries

  • 1. Understanding the Actuaries Pension Funding Overview for Attorneys & HR Professionals October 16, 2014
  • 2. Agenda Role of the Enrolled Actuary 3 ASOPs 8 Funding Requirements 19 Government Forms and Filings 40 Recent Legislation/Hot Topics 47
  • 3. Role of the Enrolled Actuary
  • 4. Actuarial Credentials Cheat Sheet There are several different actuarial societies and organizations from which a U.S. actuary may hold a credential: • Society of Actuaries (SOA) • Casualty Actuarial Society (CAS) • Joint Board for the Enrollment of Actuaries (JBEA) • American Academy of Actuaries (AAA) • Conference of Consulting Actuaries (CCA) • American Society of Pension Professionals and Actuaries (ASPPA) U.S. pension actuaries typically hold one of more of the following designations: • FSA – Fellow of the Society of Actuaries • ASA – Associate of the Society of Actuaries • MAAA – Member of the American Academy of Actuaries • EA – Enrolled Actuary • FCA – Fellow of the Conference of Consulting Actuaries • FSPA - Fellow, Society of Pension Actuaries • MSPA - Member, Society of Pension Actuaries 4
  • 5. Role of the Enrolled Actuary • What is an enrolled actuary? • Any individual who has satisfied the qualifications of the Joint Board for the Enrollment of Actuaries (JBEA) and has been approved by the Joint Board to perform actuarial services under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) of 1974 – Actuarial services is defined by the JBEA as “performance of actuarial valuations and preparation of any actuarial valuation reports” • How can I find out whether a practitioner is an enrolled actuary in good standing with the Joint Board? • Review the roster of enrolled actuaries in active status at: www.irs.gov/PUP/taxpros/Active%20EA%20Roster.pdf 5
  • 6. Role of the Enrolled Actuary U.S. Qualified Defined Benefit Plans must meet certain criteria to maintain their qualified status An EA is needed to meet some of these criteria, for example - • Internal Revenue Code (IRC) section 412 – Minimum Funding Standards – An enrolled actuary must certify the minimum required contribution for a plan for a plan year • Internal Revenue Code (IRC) sections 432/436 – Actuarial Zone Certification for Multiemployer Plans and Funding-Based Limits on Benefits and Benefit Accruals Under Single-Employer Plans – An enrolled actuary must certify to the funded status of a plan for a plan year which will govern how the plan is operated for such plan year • An EA must sign Schedule SB/MB of Form 5500 setting out the plan's funded status 6
  • 7. Role of the Enrolled Actuary • Some other relevant IRC sections • 404 Deductible employer contributions to a deferred-payment plan • 412 Minimum funding standards • 413 Collectively bargained plans, etc. • 418 Multiemployer plan reorganization rules • 430 Minimum funding requirements for single-employer defined benefit pension plans • 431 Minimum funding requirements for multiemployer defined benefit plans • 432 Additional funding rules for multiemployer plans in endangered status or critical status • 436 Funding-based limits on benefits and benefit accruals under single-employer plans 7
  • 9. Actuarial Standards of Practice (ASOPs) • Enrolled Actuaries must ensure they follow ASOPs pertaining to pension plans as issued by the Actuarial Standards Board (ASB) • To name a few…. • ASOP 4 – Measuring Pension Obligations and Determining Pension Plan Costs or Contributions • ASOP 27 – Selection of Economic Assumptions for Measuring Pension Obligations • ASOP 35 – Selection of Demographic Assumptions and other Noneconomic Assumptions for Measuring Pension Obligations 9
  • 10. ASOP 4 – Measuring Pension Obligations The actuary may be required to make judgments or recommendations on the choice of actuarial assumptions, actuarial cost methods, asset valuation methods, and amortization methods • The actuary may have the responsibility and authority to select some or all assumptions or • The actuary may be asked to advise the individuals who have that responsibility and authority or • The actuary may perform actuarial calculations using assumptions or methods prescribed by applicable law or selected by others ASOP No. 4 addresses actuarial cost methods and provides guidance for coordinating and integrating all of these elements of an actuarial valuation of a plan. 10
  • 11. Actuarial Assumptions Actuary’s best estimate of occurrence of future events and those prescribed Reflects sponsor’s knowledge of special situations Reflects past experience Used to determine funding and accounting requirements 11
  • 12. Actuarial Assumptions • Pension obligation values incorporate assumptions about pension payment commencement, duration, and amount • They also require discount rates to convert future expected payments into present values Economic assumptions are covered under ASOP No. 27 Noneconomic assumptions are covered under ASOP No. 35 12
  • 13. ASOP 27 - Economic Assumptions • The actuary should consider the following factors when identifying the types of economic assumptions to use for a specific measurement: – the purpose of the measurement – the characteristics of the obligation to be measured – materiality of the assumption to the measurement • Each economic assumption should be consistent with every other economic assumption for the measurement period 13
  • 14. ASOP 27 - Economic Assumptions Some examples of economic assumptions that affect the measurement of pension obligations are the following: Discount rate – rate used to calculate the present value of expected future plan payments, this may be a single rate or a series of rates Inflation rate – general economic inflation, defined as price changes over the whole of the economy Investment return – anticipated returns on the plan’s current and, if appropriate for the measurement, future assets Compensation increase – assumed year-to-year change in compensation, generally, a participant’s compensation will increase over the long term in accordance with inflation, productivity growth and merit increases 14
  • 15. ASOP 35 - Demographic Assumptions • The actuary should use professional judgment to estimate possible future outcomes based on past experience and future expectations • Reasonable demographic assumptions based on the particular characteristics of the defined benefit plan should be selected • A reasonable assumption is one that is expected to appropriately model the contingency being measured and is not anticipated to produce significant cumulative actuarial gains or losses over the measurement period 15
  • 16. ASOP 35 - Demographic Assumptions Some examples of demographic assumptions that affect the measurement of pension obligations are the following: Retirement rates – probability that a participant will retire at any given age once eligible to do so under the plan provisions Termination rates – probability that a participant will terminate employment at any given age prior to becoming eligible to retire under the plan provisions Mortality rates – probability that a participant will die at any given age Optional Form of Benefit Election rates – probability that a participant will elect a specific form of payment upon commencement of benefit from the plan Input from the plan sponsor is critical in helping to set these assumptions e.g., the introduction of an early retirement subsidy could influence the plan’s incidence of retirement 16
  • 17. Purpose of Experience Studies • Comparison of actual plan experience with actuarial assumptions • Generally performed every 3 to 5 years • Watch for trends (e.g. improving mortality, changes in retirement patterns) • Adjust for special events which occurred during investigation period (e.g. early retirement windows/reduction in force) • Modify assumptions as needed Auditors have been asking more frequently for the basis of demographic assumptions and specifically whether and when an experience study has been done 17
  • 18. Effect on Liabilities and Contributions Due to Changes in Major Assumptions Assumption Action Usual Liability Effect 18 Discount Rate Inflation Rate Retirement Rate Retire younger Turnover Rate More terminations
  • 20. Introduction to Pension Funding Governed by laws in the Internal Revenue Code (IRC) which determine the annual minimum required contribution and maximum tax-deductible contribution • Pre-funding required under IRC to secure benefits and maintain a US tax-qualified plan status (IRC 430 and IRC 431) • Maximum tax-deductible limit to prevent the “pension piggy bank” (IRC 404) Actuarial method and certain assumptions prescribed by IRC 20
  • 21. Introduction to Pension Funding The Pension Protection Act of 2006 (PPA) was signed into law on August 17, 2006 • Most comprehensive reform of pension laws since the enactment of ERISA • Designed to increase the minimum funding requirements and strengthen the pension insurance system (PBGC) • Effective for plan years beginning in 2008 • Changed the landscape of funding rules 21
  • 22. Key Definitions/Terms Actuarial Accrued Liability (AAL): present value of a plan’s accrued benefits based on the plan’s funding method Funding Target (FT): mandated AAL for single employer plans Normal Cost (NC): present value of benefits expected to accrue during the plan year based on the plan’s funding method. Target Normal Cost (TNC): NC for single employer plans using mandated funding method. – Includes effect of expected increases in compensation and estimated expenses during the coming year Actuarial Value of Assets (AVA): • Market Value of Assets (MVA) unless averaging elected • Single Employer: Averaging up to 24 months; must fall within a corridor of 90% to 110% of MVA • Multiemployer: Averaging up to 5 years; must fall within a corridor of 80% to 120% of MVA Funding Shortfall: excess, if any, of the funding target over the value of plan assets as of the valuation date 22
  • 23. Key Definitions/Terms (continued) Yield Curve: Each month the IRS publishes its yield curve, segment rates, and 24-month average segment rates based on yields of high quality corporate bonds rated A or better – Segment rates are the average of spot rates for the first 5 years, next 15 years, and after 20 years – Can elect to use full yield curve (without 24 month average) Effective interest rate: single interest rate that produces the same funding target as that produced in the valuation using segment rates or full yield curve 23
  • 24. Funding Comparison Assumption & Methods Single Employer Multiemployer Interest Mandated: Segment Rate or Yield Curve Actuary’s Assumption: Long term expected return on plan assets Mortality Mandated: Generational/Static (can use plan specific) Actuary’s Assumption Funding Method Mandated Varies Asset Method Up to 24 month averaging with 90%-110% corridor Up to 5 year smoothing with 80% - 120% corridor Lump Sum Interest Same as funding Actuary’s Assumption Amortization Period 7 years 10 or 15 years depending on type of base (can have extensions) 24
  • 25. Key Elements of Funding Rules Single Employer Multiemployer Minimum contribution Minimum contribution Maximum contribution Maximum contribution “At-Risk” Status Reorganization Status AFTAP Certification Actuarial Certification Benefit Limitations Zone Statuses 25
  • 26. Single Employer Funding Minimum Required Contributions (MRC) • Minimum contribution is the sum of: – Target normal cost : funding future liabilities year by year – Shortfall amortization charge (seven-year amortization): funding past liabilities • If asset value exceeds funding target, the target normal cost will be reduced by this excess 26
  • 27. Single Employer Funding Minimum Required Contributions (MRC) – Timing • Quarterly Installments – Required if plan is less than 100% funded – Each required quarterly installment equals 25% of the lesser of A and B: A = 90% of the MRC for the current plan year B = 100% of the MRC for the prior plan year – Installments for a calendar plan year are due by April 15th, July 15th, and October 15th of the current year and January 15th of the following year • Final Installment – Due no later than September 15th following the end of the plan year – Remainder of MRC not paid via quarterly installments 27
  • 28. Single Employer Funding Maximum Tax-Deductible Contributions • Amount to bring assets up to funding target, plus “cushion” – 50% of funding target – Expected increase in funding target for: • Salary increases in pay related plan • Benefit increases in non-pay related plan • Increases in maximum benefit and compensation limits 28
  • 29. Single Employer Funding At-Risk Plans • Plan is deemed “at-risk” if the funded status for the preceding year falls below certain thresholds • Must use the “at-risk” assumptions for valuation – Assume employees eligible to retire in next 10 years will retire at earliest possible date and elect most valuable option • Results in higher minimum required contribution – Goal is to get the plan’s funded status up more quickly • At-risk status of plan must be disclosed in Annual Funding Notice • Funding of deferred compensation plans during periods when the pension plan is considered “at-risk” results in adverse tax consequences to deferred compensation plan participants 29
  • 30. Single Employer Funding AFTAP Certification • Adjusted Funding Target Attainment Percentage (AFTAP) is generally the ratio of plan assets to the funding target • IRC Section 436 places restrictions on certain benefits when a plan’s AFTAP falls below certain thresholds Condition Benefits Restricted AFTAP 80% Amendments that improve benefits cannot take effect unless plan sponsor makes a contribution to bring the AFTAP back up to 80% after the amendment 80% AFTAP 60% Accelerated benefit distributions (i.e. lump sum payments) are partially restricted AFTAP 60% Accelerated benefit distributions (i.e. lump sum payments) are fully restricted Benefit accruals are frozen Shutdown benefits cannot be paid • Each year the plan’s enrolled actuary must sign an AFTAP certification which determines whether any benefit restrictions apply to the plan year 30
  • 31. Multiemployer Funding Minimum Required Contributions Minimum Required Contribution = Charges - Credits • Charges: Credits: Funding Deficiency Credit Balance + Normal Cost + Amortization Credits + Amortization Charges + Full Funding Credits + Interest to end of year + Interest to end of year • For plans in critical status (not endangered), excise taxes waived in event of funding deficiency • Shortfall Funding Method - Multiemployer plans generally cannot assess employers for additional contributions to meet minimum funding requirement. Adoption of shortfall method is a funding method change. 31
  • 32. Multiemployer Funding Maximum Tax Deductible Contributions Maximum Tax Deductible Contribution = 1) Normal Cost + 10 year Amortization of Unfunded AAL. 2) Full Funding Limit = Greater of RPA and ERISA Full Funding Limits 3) Lesser of 1 and 2 4) 140% RPA Unfunded Current Liability, not less than MRC 5) Greater of 3 and 4 32
  • 33. Multiemployer Funding Reorganization Status Reorganization Status • Definition of reorganization: Vested Benefit Charge Net Charge to FSA – Vested Benefit Charge = 10 year amortization of unfunded pays status benefits + 25 year amortization of non-pay status benefits • apply assets to pay status benefits first • Consequences of Reorganization – Minimum Contribution Requirements – Potential reductions in vested benefits – Post-PPA ’06: projected insolvency determination every 5 years 33
  • 34. Multiemployer Actuarial Certification Under IRC 432, fund actuary is required to certify annually to a multiemployer plan’s zone status by the 90th day of plan year. • Not Critical or Endangered • No Waivers for MRC Green Zone • Endangered/Seriously Endangered • Funding Improvement Plan Yellow Zone • Critical/Seriously Critical • Rehabilitation Plan Red Zone 34
  • 35. Multiemployer Funding Actuarial Certification Actuarial Certification is based on projections using: • Liabilities from most recent valuations completed (prior valuation results) reflecting any significant changes that have occurred during the year • Current asset information • Projected Industry Activity from Trustees • Contribution rates and benefit accruals under current Collective Bargaining Agreements (CBAs)/Rehabilitation Plan/Funding Improvement Plan Funding percentages based on Unit Credit 35
  • 36. Multiemployer Funding Actuarial Certification Red Zone (Critical Status): I. Funded % less than 65% AND (MVA + contributions over next 7 years) (benefits and administrative expenses over next 7 years) OR II. Projected to have funding deficiency within 4 years (5 years if Funded % = 65%) OR III. (Normal Cost + interest on unfunded liability) contributions AND PV inactive benefits PV active benefits AND Projected to have funding deficiency within 5 years OR IV. (MVA + PV 5 years of contributions) (PV 5 years of benefits + administrative expenses) 36
  • 37. Multiemployer Funding Actuarial Certification Yellow Zone (Endangered Status): Not in Critical Status and I. Funded % 80% OR II. Expected to have funding deficiency within 7 plan years Seriously Endangered Status: Meets both conditions I. and II. for Endangered Status 37
  • 38. Multiemployer Funding Zone Statuses Red Zone (Critical Status): • Automatic removal of non-increasing annuity forms (lump sums) with exception of corrective retroactive payment • Adjustable Benefits – Trustees can remove benefits otherwise protected under 411(d) but cannot : – Change normal retirement age / Reduce normal retirement benefit – For retirees in pay status, benefits payable based on amendments in effect for less than 5 years may be adjusted, but only after retirees have received required notification of Actuarial Certification of initial year of Critical Status – Limitation on reduction to future accruals under default schedule – accrual rate cannot be less than smaller of: – Monthly normal retirement benefit equal to 1% of contributions or – Pre-Rehabilitation Plan accrual rate 38
  • 39. Multiemployer Funding Zone Statuses Yellow Zone (Endangered Status): • Can reduce future benefits • Can reduce/ remove unprotected benefits for those not currently in receipt (always an option) • No plan amendments increasing liabilities by: increasing benefits, changing accrual rates or accelerating vesting schedule – Amendments permitted if actuary certifies: i) amendment consistent with Funding Improvement Plan and ii) additional contributions were made to pay for cost 39
  • 41. Form 5500 – Actuarial Report The plan’s enrolled actuary must complete the Schedule SB / MB with attachments for a qualified defined benefit plans which summarizes actuarial results Schedule SB • Single employer and multiple employer plans Schedule MB • Multiemployer plans • Report progress of funding improvement /rehabilitation plan 41
  • 42. ERISA 104(d) Notice (Multiemployer) Summary of Plan Information for Employers and Unions: Plan must provide report to each union and contributing employer: Description of contribution and benefit schedules Information reported on the Schedule R of the Form 5500 Endangered or Critical Status Information Notice of right to copy of Form 5500 Summary plan description Summary of any material modifications 42
  • 43. PBGC – Annual Premium Filings PBGC is the insurance agency for defined benefit pension established in 1974. Separate trusts for single and multiemployer plans. Single Employer Plans Multiemployer Plans Year Flat Rate Variable Rate Flat Rate 43 Premium (Per Participant) Premium (% of UVB) Cap (Per Part.) Premium (Per Participant) 2016* $64.00 2.9% $500 $12.00 2015* $57.00 2.4% $412 $12.00 2014 $49.00 1.4% $412 $12.00 Select Historical Premiums 2007 $31.00 0.9% -- $8.00 2005 $19.00 0.9% -- $2.60 1984 $2.60 -- -- $1.40 1974 $1.00 -- -- $0.50 * Subject to indexing
  • 44. PBGC – Coverage Coverage for basic benefits at normal retirement age, most early retirement benefits, annuity benefits for survivors of plan participants, and disability benefits. Maximum monthly benefit guarantee varies by age and form of payment. Varies by years of service for multiemployer plans. Single Employer Plans Multiemployer Plans* Year Maximum Monthly Guaranteed Benefits 2014 $4,843.18 $1,072.50 Select Historical Maximum Monthly Guaranteed Benefits 2007 $4,125.00 $487.50 2005 $3,698.86 $487.50 1984 $2,556.82 $487.50 1980 $2,164.77 $487.50 *100% of first $11/month per year of service, plus 75% of next $33/month per year of service with a maximum of $35.75/month. 44
  • 45. PBGC Filing Requirements – 4010 Filing • An FTAP that is less than 80% for any plan sponsored by the Company triggers an ERISA §4010 filing for the plan year • Exempt from filing if aggregated unfunded liability is less than $15M 45
  • 46. Notices to Participants – Annual Funding Notices PPA requires the administrator of a ALL defined benefit plan that is insured by the PBGC to provide an annual notice of plan funding to all participants and beneficiaries under the plan • Provided to active participants, current retirees, beneficiaries of deceased retirees, and terminated participants with a vested right to future benefits • Provided to all labor unions representing any participant or beneficiary • Provided no later than 120 days after the end of the plan year, which is April 30th for plans with a calendar year plan year • Includes information about the Plan’s assets and liabilities, how Plan assets are allocated among different categories of investments, the Company’s investment and funding policies, and participant rights and protections 46
  • 48. Funding Relief Effective January 1, 2012 the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21) added collars to segment rates – Based on 25 year average of each of the segment rates as of September 30 of the preceding calendar year • Collar is based on the valuation year Valuation Year Min Max 2012 90% 110% 2013 85% 115% 2014 80% 120% 2015 75% 125% 2016+ 70% 130% • Only applies to the minimum contribution, FTAP and AFTAP 48
  • 49. Funding Relief The Highway and Transportation Funding Act (HATFA) was signed into law on August 8, 2014 – The 90 to 110% corridor under MAP-21 was extended through 2017, with the 5% adjustments beginning in 2018 Plan Year Beginning MAP-21 HATFA 2012 90 to 110% 90 to 110% 2013 85 to 115% 2014 80 to 120% 2015 75 to 125% 2016 2017 2018 85 to 115% 70 to 130% 2019 80 to 120% 2020 75 to 125% 2021 and later 70 to 130% Plan sponsors are permitted to delay using the new rates to 2014 plan years to avoid revising valuation work and plan operations during 2013 As with the original MAP-21 choices, employers are permitted to limit the delay to only section 436 benefit restrictions 49
  • 50. Funding Relief Funding relief and the Annual Funding Notice (AFN) • MAP-21 Supplement • Required when – A plan’s funded ratio without regard to MAP-21 is less than 95%, and – Funding shortfall is greater than $500,000, and – There are at least 50 participants in the plan • Not required for plan years beginning on or after January 1, 2015 • Supplement shows the plan’s MRC and funded status without regard to MAP-21 • DOL issued Field Assistance Bulletin (FAB) No. 2013-11 on March 8, 2013 containing a model MAP-21 Supplement No guidance has been issued for HATFA yet, expectation is that supplement will be required beyond 2015 and model language will be updated to cover HATFA 50
  • 51. Mortality Table Update Mortality assumption used to determine how long plan participants are expected to live and collect their pension. Also used to determine the value of lump sum payments. Society of Actuaries (SOA) studies US mortality trends and develops tables for pension plan actuarial valuations SOA has been working on updated tables for uninsured pension plan experience since 2009 Current IRS prescribed mortality table uses 2000 as the base year with projected improvements 51
  • 52. Mortality Table Update RP-2014 and MP-2014 Background Current study used participant data for years 2004 through 2008 • Over 10.5 million life-years of exposure • Over 220,000 deaths • Results of study projected to 2014 based on observed rates of annual improvement Study also analyzed improvement in mortality over time • Finds that mortality is improving faster than expected based on prior studies • Finds that rates of improvement are accelerating e.g., people now age 50 are expected to have more improvement after age 60 than a person now age 60 52
  • 53. Mortality Table Update Impact and Timing New tables will generally increase pension liabilities by 6-10% Final tables expected to be published by the end of October 2014 • Audit firms are likely to expect/question/push for adoption for 2014 year-end disclosure • IRS unlikely to adopt new table for funding until 2016, due to drag in required regulatory process • New table will likely take effect for qualified plan administration (417(e) lump sums) at same time as funding 53
  • 54. PPA Sunset – Multiemployer Plans PPA is set to sunset at the end of 2014 Written into the act is sunset provisions which state that plans operating under a rehabilitation or funding improvement plan upon expiration of PPA will continue to do so upon the sunset of the law. 1 year extension has been included as part of legislation considered during 2014, but nothing passed. Currently unclear whether Congress will act before the end of 2014. 54
  • 55. NCCMP Proposal NCCMP “Solutions, Not Bailouts” • itemizes the severe funding deficiencies of multiemployer plans and the multiemployer PBGC fund that insures these plans • outlines several potential solutions including encouraging plan mergers, alternate plan design… • but most controversial the ability to reduce the benefits for those currently in receipt of benefits 55
  • 56. QA 56
  • 57. Presenters José M. Jara, JD, LLM Shirley Cheung, FSA, EA, MAAA Principal, National Practice Leader Multiemployer Plans Director, Retirement Wealth Practice Wealth Practice Buck Consultants, LLC, A Xerox Company Buck Consultants, LLC, A Xerox Company Jose.Jara@xerox.com Shirley.Cheung@xerox.com 212.330.1114 212.330.1029 Suzanne Hughes, ASA, EA, MAAA Melissa M. Conklin Director, Retirement Senior Consultant, Retirement Wealth Practice Wealth Practice Buck Consultants, LLC, A Xerox Company Buck Consultants, LLC, A Xerox Company Suzanne.Hughes@xerox.com Melissa.Conklin@xerox.com 201.902.2615 201.553.6317 57