Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Clad agm forest research_nadeem

1,086 views

Published on

  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

Clad agm forest research_nadeem

  1. 1. Flanders Moss: The Effects of BogRestoration on Drainage Water Chemistry Nadeem Shah Forest Hydrology Centre for Forestry and Climate Change
  2. 2. Rationale Peatland Conservation • The importance of peatland conservation and restoration is now well recognised. • However the impact of restoration on soil and water has not been fully investigated. • What are the effects of peatland restoration on drainage water chemistry? • What are the effects on freshwater ecology? • What can be done to prevent or minimise impacts?2 09/03/2011
  3. 3. Freshwater Ecology Freshwater Pearl Mussel • Found only in clean rivers and streams; now threatened with extinction throughout its holarctic range. • In Scotland viable populations still remain and are the focus of conservation action. • Environmental factors? Most likely causes • oxygen deficiency caused by chronic eutrophication - Nutrient and sediment pollution from agriculture - Clearfelling in the uplands - Sewage discharges - Aquaculture discharges3 09/03/2011
  4. 4. Phosphate risk? • In Ireland there was a series of significant FWPM kills. • The main cause was considered to be raised phosphate levels within run-off from peatland forestry following clearfelling (algal blooms) which led to a moratorium on clearfelling in catchments identified as sensitive for FWPM. • Cummins and Farrell (2003) found that phosphate concentrations increased following clearfelling on peatlands. • Most other studies assessing the impact of clearfelling on drainage water have provided little evidence of raised phosphate levels after felling. • However these studies have been on mineral soils which have a higher phosphate sorption capacity than peat.4 09/03/2011
  5. 5. Carbon Increased DOC in surface waters • atmospheric CO2 concentration • climate warming • continued N deposition • decreased sulfate deposition (DOC more soluble as acidity and ionic strength increase.) • hydrological changes due to increased precipitation, droughts, and land use change • Another FR study at Flanders Moss looking at effects of restoration on greenhouse gas flux.5 09/03/2011
  6. 6. Aims Flanders Moss • Investigate the effects of bog restoration, through clearfelling, on drainage water chemistry. • Quantify changes in nutrients (particularly phosphate) and DOC following restoration. • Recommendations to improve best practice. • Guidance for restoration.6 09/03/2011
  7. 7. Location Figure 1 Flanders Moss location7 09/03/2011
  8. 8. Background Background • Flanders Moss - raised bog and part of Achray Forest on the floodplain of the River Forth. • Organic rich peaty gley soil -Sphagnum/Eriophorum peat up to 8.5 m deep (average 4.6 m). • The land has been drained since the 1920’s, initially to improve grouse shooting. • Drained and ploughed in 1964/65 for a silvicultural experiment. • Planted with Lodgepole Pine and Sitka Spruce; phosphate fertilizer application around each tree in 19658 09/03/2011
  9. 9. Experimental Set-up• Three sampling points; one control catchment.• Two drains and a natural stream (Blackrat burn)• Fortnightly water sampling began in 2008• Major inorganic anions and cations DOC, conductivity, pH, colour, suspended solids and occasional ICP. Figure 2 Aerial photograph of Flanders Moss showing sampling points.9 09/03/2011
  10. 10. Water level recorder • Installed automatic pressure and temperature sensor - depth and temperature reading every 15 minutes. • Rating the channels • Convert chemical concentrations to fluxes. Figure 3 Water level recorder and stilling well at Flanders Moss Site 310 09/03/2011
  11. 11. Data collection • Clearfelling delayed due to on-site problems • One area was clearfelled in winter 09/10 • Preliminary data11 09/03/2011
  12. 12. Preliminary results Figure 4 P(PO4) and N(NO3) in Flanders Moss drainage water; vertical lines indicate clearfelling period at Site 1 • Phosphate concentration increases following felling • Delayed response – (brash dries out and phosphate is leached.) • Is there more P to come? Will regrowth of vegetation prevent further leaching– recycling of P12 09/03/2011
  13. 13. Preliminary Results Figure 5 Colour and DOC in Flanders Moss drainage water; vertical lines indicate clearfelling period at Site 1 • Colour and DOC increase following felling period • Is there more DOC to come in Spring/Summer 2010?13 09/03/2011
  14. 14. Preliminary Results Figure 6 pH and suspended solids in Flanders Moss drainage water; vertical lines indicate clearfelling period at Site 1 • pH increase at Site 1 following felling – proximity to road?14 09/03/2011
  15. 15. Notes Points to note • Clearfelling led to an increase in Phosphate and DOC in drainage waters. • Too early to draw any conclusions on the environmental impacts. • Monitoring of clearfelled site is ongoing and further clearfelling is planned. • Implications for management and restoration - depending on proportion of catchment felled, catchment size, receiving waters and local ecology15 09/03/2011
  16. 16. Thank you Thank you16 09/03/2011

×