Assessment of Options for land use in a post-2020 world
•Download as PPTX, PDF•
1 like•1,746 views
This presentation was given at a session of the Global Landscapes Forum in Lima, Peru, alongside the UNFCCC COP20. The session, titled "Assessment of options for land use in a post-2020 world", took stock of recent publications on the subject and the current status of land use, land-use change and forestry (LULUCF), REDD+ and land-related CDM discussions in the UNFCCC. A presentation showed potential options for how the land sector might be included in a post-2020 ADP agreement, highlighting the relative strengths and weaknesses of those options. This set of options was discussed at a smaller workshop the week before, attended by LULUCF and REDD+ negotiators.
Recommended
Recommended
More Related Content
Viewers also liked
Viewers also liked (20)
Similar to Assessment of Options for land use in a post-2020 world
Similar to Assessment of Options for land use in a post-2020 world (20)
More from CIFOR-ICRAF
More from CIFOR-ICRAF (20)
Recently uploaded
Recently uploaded (20)
Assessment of Options for land use in a post-2020 world
- 1. Assessment of Options for land use in a post-2020 world Moderator: Patrick Wylie, IUCN Speakers: Jason Funk, Union of Concerned Scientists Maria Sanz-Sanchez, FAO Peter Iverson, Denmark Josefina Brana-Varela, WWF Paulo Canaveira, EU
- 2. Summary list of principles 1. Convention Articles 2 and 4 2. Continuous Improvement 3. Use of IPCC Principles and Inventory Guidance 4. Once In, Always In 5. Pathway to Complete Coverage 6. Focus on Measurable Effects of Policies and Measures 7. Promote Social and Environmental Governance 8. Technical Facilitation of Reporting and Assessment
- 3. Additional Principles Discussed • Transparency • Flexibility • Incentives; • Step-wise approach • Simplicity • Multi-functionality
- 4. Potential accounting frameworks 1. All participating Parties operating under a single, common set of accounting rules. 2. Parties choose from one of a few differentiated modalities, all of which have common elements 3. Parties choose one of the existing modalities (LULUCF, REDD+, CDM) 4. No overarching framework; Parties account using self-defined approaches.
- 5. Option 1: Single set of rules for all Brazil Kenya Germany Accounting framework USA New Zealand Indonesia Uganda DRC This figure is for illustrative purposes only, and is not meant to suggest specific commitments from particular countries or to prejudge the outcome of negotiations.
- 6. Option 2: Differentiated modalities Common elements USA New Zealand Modality Modality Modality Brazil Kenya Germany Indonesia Uganda DRC This figure is for illustrative purposes only, and is not meant to suggest specific commitments from particular countries or to prejudge the outcome of negotiations.
- 7. Option 3: Apply existing approaches Brazil Kenya Germany USA LULUCF REDD+ CDM New Zealand Indonesia Uganda DRC This figure is for illustrative purposes only, and is not meant to suggest specific commitments from particular countries or to prejudge the outcome of negotiations.
- 8. Option 4: No overall guidance Brazil Kenya Germany USA New Zealand Indonesia Uganda DRC This figure is for illustrative purposes only, and is not meant to suggest specific commitments from particular countries or to prejudge the outcome of negotiations.