Leaders And Managers Essay

Leaders And Managers Essay
Leaders and Managers Leaders and managers are two individual roles with multiple intertwining definitions. In order to be a leader, one must have
followers, however; does not everyone under management, follow the managers orders? Therefore, the question arises, are managers leaders? If so,
what constitutes as leadership? Obviously, in order to obtain these roles, one must have influence over their subordinates, but does the level of
influence fluctuate between a manager's role and a leaders role? What exactly are their individual roles and are they one in the same? The purpose of
this paper is to analysis these questions and to distinguish the differences and similarities between managers and leaders and the possibility of one
individual...show more content...
Influence It is obvious that managers and leaders both have an influence over subordinates and followers, but to what degree? Managers oversee an
organizations overall performance, where as a leader oversees a group of members and related work. A leader possesses the interpersonal
communication abilities needed to keep their followers informed, motivated, and headed in the right direction. Therefore, they tend to have directly
connected working relationships with their followers. Managers, on the other hand, tend to influence indirectly and their interpersonal relationships are
limited to those who obtain and relay information to and for them. Both managers and leaders have the role of motivating, but to depend greatly on the
amount of interaction they have with their subordinates and followers.
Role Sharing So it comes to stand that while the titles of manager and leader are separate, but codependent, can one individual have both roles? The
answer is yes, in some cases, and no in others. "A person can be a leader without being a manager..., and a person can be a manager without leading"
(Yukl, 2010, p. 6). To be a leader one simply has to have the ability to motivate members of their organization to perform at the highest level and with
unity and harmony (Jones & George, 2007). Leadership can be challenging at times due to environmental factors and different cultures.
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

The Role Of A Leader Essay
The role of a leader is often seen as to lead. However, there are many ways and styles that can be adopted by a leader, Until recently a manager was
seen as a leader, but there is an increasing differentiation made in the commercial world between a manager and a leader. Therefore, in this paper
there will be the aim of defining what a leader is, how they may be effective and how skills may be developed by a potential leader. Webster's
English Dictionary defines a leader as "One who, or that which, leads or conducts; a guide; a conductor. Especially: (a) One who goes first. (b) One
having authority to direct; a chief; a commander" (Dictionary.com). This gives us the insight into how leaders are seen today. In the past a leader and a
manager were one and the same thing, with the advent of scientific management and the development of the theories of Frederick Winslow Taylor the
job of the manager or leader was to gain the greatest value from the employees. In many easy, this is still the role of the leader. However, the methods
and perceptions regarding the way in which this is achieved have changed greatly. The industrial revolution that embodies scientific management saw
standardisation in the use of procedures and tools, with the one best method being dictated to the most suitable employee, who was expected to perform
the task in their machine like manner. The tasks were broken down into the smallest components which would acquire the issues give or training. John
Child

Essay on Presidential Leadership
Presidential Leadership Political leadership is the most wanted and at the same time most feared concept in U.S. political system. It is a major part of
modern presidency, and perhaps the hardest thing for a president to achieve. There are several reasons political leadership is hard for a president to
achieve. For one, founding fathers feared concentrated powers thus they established the system of checks and balances. Congress challenges almost
everything a president attempts to accomplish. Secondly, the American people do not want concentrated power, and they want to get their point across,
so they organize into interest groups. Interest groups can be very powerful, either working for or against the president, so the...show more content...
If a president has "moral authority" his power to persuade increases dramatically. For example if Nixon tried to persuade Congress to pass a
certain bill after the Watergate, chances are he would be unsuccessful. Public approval rating is one of the most important things for a president. A
president with a high enough approval rating can take up more issues and solve them than a president with a low ratings, therefore improving his
position in the office. To demonstrate importance of public approval rating one can look at the recent events surrounding Bill Clinton. While he
was the in office, the economy was booming, unemployment was under control and foreign policy seemed to be working, so naturally Clinton was
in good shape as far as his ratings were concerned. When the Monica scandal broke out and the president was in danger of being impeached, it was
his good public approval ratings that has helped him stay in the office. Congress had probably felt a little unsure of impeaching a president in such a
good standing. Had Clinton's ratings been lower he would have probably been out of office by now. Presidents ability to go public is second
requirement for effective political leadership. Is a president is successful in persuading American public than in turn he will be effective in dealing with
the Washington community. The reason behind this is that if the public is persuaded, then public can force their

Effective Leadership Essay
In today's competitive world, leadership skills are crucial for both personal and professional development. Leadership is an important function of
management which helps an individual or a business to maximize efficiency and to achieve goals. Leadership has different meanings to various
authors.Most commonly, leadership is defined as influence, that is, the art of influencing people so that they will strive willingly and enthusiastically
toward the achievement of group goals. (Koontz). Leadership is the process of influencing the activities of either formal or informal group in the task
of goal setting and goal achievement. A leader is one whose magnetic personality innervates people for some cause. Not by words, but by their actions is
...show more content...
People requires good leadership skills at personal, professional and social level. Personal leadership helps us to determine our desires, strengths and
abilities. It means Knowing what we want out of life; knowing what success is for us; what are our goals and how to achieve those goals regardless
of what other people think, say, or do. Personal leadership helps us to make our present better and shape a good future. Good leadership is also
important to run a business. Usually, in companies, management stresses more on decision– making skills. They believe a timely and smart decision
will help their company to succeed. They forget that implementation of those decisions are as important as making those decision. Without a proper
implementation , there will be no results. Like there is a saying that, it's easier to said than done. Similarly, making a decision will change nothing, its
how to get things done in a timely and an effective way will help an organization to accomplish their goals. Leadership is crucial in implementing
decisions correctly and successfully. Each of us understand importance of leadership when it comes to our country. We all try to vote for the best
person in elections because it matters who is in office. President make decisions concerning our lives, country, and the world. As a nation, we place no
greater responsibility on any one individual than we do on the president. Therefore, leadership

Essay on Leaders vs Managers
Leaders Vs Managers Steven Powell MGT 380 Ms. Alysia Young July 12, 2010 There is the age old question of what is the difference between a
manager and a leader? Most people will say that you can't be a manager without being a leader. In this paper, I will discuss in detail, what is it that
leaders and managers do, can leaders and managers be one in the same, as well as, explain the difference between managers and leaders. Most
successful businesses usually consisted of a team of successful managers. Note that in order to be a manager it does not require a person to be a
leader. Managers often ask your "how" and "who" questions in an organization. Managers are about appealing to the head through planning,...show
more content...
(Tanner, 2009) A leader is also a person who guides others toward a common goal, showing the way by example, and creating an environment in
which other team members feel actively involved in the entire process. A leader is not the boss of the team but, instead, the person that is
committed to carrying out the mission of the business. A strong leader will possess several qualities such as being a good listener, focused,
organized, available, includes others, decisive and confident. ("What is," 2009) These qualities make an effectively leader as well as a manager. In
order to be a leader or managers, a person needs not be one in the same. Because simple put, some people are managers and other people are
leaders. A manager has a different agenda than a leader, for example, managers do things right, while leaders do the right thing. This means that
managers do things by the book and follow company policy, while leaders follow their own intuition, which may in turn be of more benefit to the
company. ("The Difference," 1997). A leader is more emotional than a manager is. Another major distinction, is as a manager, in order to get a
subordinate to do a job, the manager doesn't have to be a leader because he or she is given that power by virtue of position, in other words, all the
manager has to do is tell a subordinate to do something because he or she is the manager, they must be

Motivation and Leadership Essay
Motivation and Leadership are intrinsically linked in the fact that one allows an easement in the process of the other. Without the ability to use the
mutual relationship of leadership to influence the motivators of followers, leaders stagnate and are limited by their own inability to accomplish all
that must be for real change to occur. In less Rostonian terms (that is, based on Rost (1993)), without a motivated group of followers leaders are
stranded and not achieving to a level of excellence. This paper will discuss some areas of importance for motivation in leadership as well as an
application to leadership theory and a discussion on personal motivators. Motivation is the reason or purpose behind action, or what causes one to act in
...show more content...
Osland, et al. (2007) provide a good introduction to three basic motivational content theories. The first theory is Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs that
proposes man is motivated by a lack in the one or more of the five common needs. The needs that Maslow identifies are physiological, safety, social
belonging, self–esteem, and self–actualization. Maslow believed that one fills needs from the most basic (like food and water) to the highest level
(self–actualization). Maslow's ideas are easy to relate to and attempt to provide an all–inclusive approach to the concept of motivation; however, there
is little evidence to support the idea that man cannot have self–actualization without the other more basic needs first satisfied. The second content
theory Osland, et al. discuss is McCelland's learned needs. McCelland states that man is motivated by one of three things: achievement, power, or
affiliation – or a mixture of the three. Each of these needs can possess a negative or positive connotation or implementation, but it is argued that
people motivated by affiliation make better leaders. The third theory presented is McGregor's Theory X and Theory Y. McGregor asserts that Theory
X people or employees are inherently lazy and must be controlled and forced to act, whereas Theory Y people are self–controlled, motivated, and
ambitious. Steers, et al. (1996) identify an additional theory of motivation, which builds on Maslow's

Essay about Great Leaders
Determination, courage, and confidence are all characteristics needed to be a good leader. The principal player in a music group is considered to
be a leader. Even bands need leaders, if we didn't have leaders where would we be today? John Quincy Adams once said, "If your actions inspire
others to dream more, learn more, do more and become more, you are a leader." A good leader is liked by the people, has power, and produces
followers. When there is an unwillingness to make things happen, to take the initiative and accept responsibility; this is when a leader emerges.
Leaders develop through drive, creativity, and devotion.
Great leaders from the past were George Washington,Adolf Hitler, Martin Luther King, and Winston Churchill. A...show more content...
Another great leader was George Washington. He was the first president of theUnited States. Washington led the Continental Army to victory in the
American Revolutionary War against Great Britain. During the nation's most critical time, George Washington saved it from the threat of collapse.
Winston Churchill was one of the greatest politicians of the United Kingdom. In 1940 he became prime minister of the country. Churchill also fought
in the British army for a short period of time. Martin Luther King, Jr., worked for racial equality and civil rights in the United States of America. He
participated in peaceful demonstrations that protested the unfair treatment of African Americans.
To have great leadership, there needs to be a leader–follower relationship. The relationship can't be effective without inspiration, involvement, and
support from both participants. To develop this alliance, the leader must give extra effort to reach out to followers. The only way a leader can be
successful is if the follower trusts the leader. The most important characteristic of a leader is to set a good example for their followers.
I once had to lead a group of individuals during a science project. The project had to be an invention that the students had to come up with. Our
science teacher split our class into random groups. The students I was placed with were lazy. They

Essay on Effective Team Leadership
Effective Team Leadership
The area of team leadership attracts a lot of attention in the modern world because of the need to assemble and deploy diverse teams for the
completion of projects. The future of many corporations relies more and more on the kind of team leadership they have for their projects. This paper
explores a number of facets that constitute effective team leadership.
There are certain essential elements that constitute the definition of leadership. It may refer to the totality of an organization's top direction–giving
functionaries, or the actions applied in providing direction that enables the organization or team to move forward towards a goal. In reality, there are
very diverse definitions of leadership depending on...show more content...
This vision attracts would–be followers to join in the effort to alleviate the challenge. Thirdly, it is characteristic of leadership to possess the skills
required to harness the resources that a group brings together and to apply those resources in alleviating the challenge in order to deliver the vision.
Without leadership, a team lacks direction and cohesion. Leadership is there to solve challenges associated with teamwork and to insure the
attainment of the main objective of the team effort. Leadership reduces the risks associated with a project. This happens because the person or team
providing direction for the project do not get involved in detailed implementation freeing them to see the big picture from which they identify and
reduce or eliminate risks. Leadership increasingly means the difference between a successful project and a failed one despite the availability of
resources. This is because of the role leadership plays in the effective allocation of resources to achieve the projects objectives.
On organization is the legacy of its past leaders. This means that all decisions a leader made while in charge live on through the systems he established,
the opportunities he seized, and the mistakes he made. In team leadership, the outcome of the team effort depends on the skill the leader possesses
empowering

Business Leadership Essay
In corporate America the term used to describe a person in a position of power is "Manager". A leader can be a manager, but a manager is not
necessarily a leader. Leaders motivate, challenge, and influence others to achieve goals. Great leaders have the necessary skills and attributes
which allow them to connect with the team and organization. Being a leader is not the same as managing an organization. Leader's posses the
interpersonal skills needed to influence others to achieve a goal willingly. Leading is a major part of a manager's job. Leaders do not need to be a
manager to lead people, but managers must know how to lead as well as manage. Each person in a company brings his or her own experiences, values,
and beliefs to the...show more content...
Bova (2008) states that the following four characteristics are found in good leaders: they believe in open communication, they do not stick with the
status quo, they are selective in what they measure, and they have passion for values and culture. Each characteristic is essential to a healthy
organizational culture. When an employee feels he or she has open communication with a leader, they are more inclined to share if problems arise
whether or not work related. Non–work related issues may eventually take a toll on an employee's performance at work. However, with open
communication, an employee feels comfortable in apprising the leader of a situation so that future problems are avoided. Not all managers are
leaders and not all leaders are managers. The biggest difference between management and leadership is people skills. In determining if a person is
a leader or a manager, Bova (2008) lists some differences with which many a person would agree. One difference is that a manager directs people.
Managers essentially tell employees to get the job done. Many people work on autopilot until their work shift ends. However, people will follow a
leader. Leaders inspire others to want to strive for their best and to go beyond their normal duties. Another difference between managers and leaders is
that managers tend to control or micromanage their department. Such management style causes employees to be unhappy and possibly rebel. Under
these types of

Collaborative Leadership Essays
Collaborative Leadership Leadership can take many different forms, depending on the person and the situation in which it is needed. Collaborative
leadership is a leadership style in which a leader brings together a large group of people, with a variety of backgrounds, to make a productive decision
and act upon it. According to Chrislip and Larson (1994):
...they are the ones who have the credibility to get the right people together to create visions, solve problems, and reach agreements about
implementable actions. They are not the leaders who tell us what to do. Instead, they are the ones who help us work together constructively. (p. xx)
This paper is intended to explain where collaborative leadership is used, what characteristics it...show more content...
The discussion is an open–process, meaning that the decision making is done amongst the group members, not just the leader. Unlike an
authoritative leader, the leader of this group allows the members to be a part of his or her final say. By doing this, it helps to keep everyone on the
same page and moving forward in the same direction. Most every community organization functions best when collaborative leadership is in place, but
with any leadership style, there are advantages and disadvantages of using it. One of the first advantages of using collaborative leadership is the
buy–in among members of the group. When a leader makes use of collaboration, it gives the members a sense of ownership and value, which in turn
builds commitment to the organization. With this loyalty, the leader can then assume a greater willingness from the members to be involved in the
implementation of their final plan. Another advantage of using this leadership style is the high levels of trust building within the group. Being that this
is an open process, members are encouraged to speak and think freely without judgment from other members or the leader. In the words of Chrislip and
Larson (1994):
"It is a shift in the practice of democracy from hostility to civility, from advocacy to engagement, from confrontation to conversation, from debate to
dialogue, and from separation to community." (p. 4)
When members feel that their voices are heard, it can also help to

Leaders And Managers Essay

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

Similar to Leaders And Managers Essay

Similar to Leaders And Managers Essay (9)

More from Buy College Papers Lorman

More from Buy College Papers Lorman (7)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Leaders And Managers Essay